Appendix a Scoping Agreement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Scoping Agreement 1900 Fort Myer Drive Multimodal Traffic Impact Analysis August 8, 2019 APPENDIX A SCOPING AGREEMENT SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM 1900 N. Fort Myer Drive Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions Contact Information Consultant Name: Mike Pinkoske, PTP & John Schick Tele: 703.917.0739 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Developer/Owner Robert Bushkoff Name: Dittmar Company Tele: 703-862-5956 E-mail: [email protected] Project Information Project Name: 1900 N. Fort Myer Drive – Holiday Inn The existing Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge is bounded by N. Nash Street to the west, Lee Highway to the north, N. Fort Myer Drive to the east, and Turnberry Tower to the south in Arlington County, Virginia. The Property Project Location: consists of two (2) tax parcels, identified as Arlington County RPC #16-022-003 and #16-022-004. The site location is shown on Figure 1. As proposed, the existing 307 room hotel would be razed and redeveloped with a new building consisting of approximately 351 hotel rooms, 543 residential units, an approximately 7,200 S.F. of ground-level hotel restaurant, and 5,700 S.F. of civic space. The subject property would be served by on-site structured parking. Access to the residential parking garage would be provided via one (1) curb cut on N. Nash Project Description: Street. Access to the hotel would be provided via two (2) curb cuts on N. Fort Myer Drive; the north curb cut would serve the drop-off/pick-up loop and the south curb cut would serve the hotel parking garage. The hotel loop connects to the parking garage internal to the site. Loading and trash would be serviced by a shared loading area with access served via a curb cut on N. Nash Street. A copy of the sketch plan, showing the proposed access scheme, is shown on Figure 2. Proposed Use: Residential Commercial Mixed Use X Other Proposed Use / See Table 1 for Trip Generation Table ITE Land Uses Trip Generation Retail – 820, Residential – 220, 1900 Fort Myer Drive - Existing Hotel – 310 A-1 SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM 1900 N. Fort Myer Drive Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions 307 Room Hotel 1900 Fort Myer Drive - Proposed Note: The proposed redevelopment 351 Room Hotel would not exceed the VDOT 542 Residential Dwelling Units Chapter 870 thresholds of 5,000 7,200 S.F. Hotel Restaurant new daily trips (see Table 1). 5,700 S.F. Civic Space (12,900 S.F. assumed as retail for trip generation to be conservative) Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions Study Period Existing Year: 2018 Build-out Year: 2023 Design Year: N/A Study Area Boundaries North: Lee Highway (US 29) South: Key Boulevard (Attach map) East: N. Lynn Street West: N. Nash Street See Figure 1 Development would be consistent with the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) for Consistency With high density residential development. Development is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Rosslyn Sector Plan, adopted July 2015. Published VDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Data: N. Nash Street –2017: 2,500 N. Fort Myer Dr. – 2017: 14,000 Available Traffic Data 2016: 2,500 2016: 13,000 (Historical, forecasts) 2015: 2,500 2015: 13,000 2014: 2,500 2014: 13,000 2013: 2,500 2013: 14,000 Road Name: Trip Distribution North: South: East: West: George Washington Memorial 10% See Figure 1 Parkway Road Name: North: South: East: West: Lee Highway/Interstate 66 20% 25% *Existing driveway counts will Road Name: North: South: East: West: be reviewed to verify the hotel Fort Myer Drive/Lynn Street 30% distributions and/or modified accordingly. Road Name: North: South: East: West: Key Bridge 15% Annual Vehicle Trip Based on a review of VDOT AADT AM Growth Rate: data in the site vicinity, a rate of Peak Period for Study 0.5 - percent will be used, (circle all that apply) PM See Table 2 compounded annually. 2 A-2 SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM 1900 N. Fort Myer Drive Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions 1. N. Nash Street/Lee Highway 7. N. Nash Street/North Site Driveway (WB) 2. N. Fort Myer Drive/Lee 8. N. Nash Street/South Site Driveway Highway (WB) 3. N. Lynn Street/Lee Highway 9. N. Fort Myer Drive/Site Driveway (WB) 4. N. Nash Street/Lee Highway 10. N. Fort Myer Drive/19th Street N. Study Intersections (EB) 5. N. Fort Myer Drive/Lee 11. N. Nash Street/Key Boulevard See Figure 1 Highway (EB) 6. N. Lynn Street/Lee Highway (EB) **Based on a review of peak hour traffic counts in the area, traffic count data will be collected between 6am-10am and 4pm-7pm at all site driveways and off-site study intersection on a typical weekday when public schools are in session. Internal allowance: Yes X No Pass-by allowance: X Yes No Reduction: Reduction: 60% (Retail Only) X Synchro 9.2 HCS (v.2000/+) Trip Adjustment Factors aaSIDRA CORSIM Other Synchro version 9.2 software will be used for intersection analysis. Synchro 9.0 Software Methodology files will be provided to the County with the submission. Improvement(s) Lynn Street Esplanade & Custis Trail Improvements. Assumed There are four (4) approved but unbuilt/unoccupied pipeline developments that will be included in this analysis, as confirmed with County staff: 1. 1401 Wilson Boulevard & 1400 Key Boulevard - 40,000 SF Grocery; 288 DU Residential Background Traffic 2. Central Place - 570,549 SF Office; 11,054 SF Retail Studies Considered 3. 1812 North Moore Street - 569,739 Office; 11,020 Retail 4. 1411 Key Boulevard - 67 Condominiums, 6 Townhomes A map denoting the locations of the above-mentioned pipeline developments is included as Figure 3. X 4.1 Site Plan Submission Form Based Code Use Permit Plan Submission Preliminary/Sketch Plan X Queuing analysis Actuation/Coordination Weaving analysis Additional Issues to be Merge analysis X Bike/Ped Accommodations X Intersection(LOS) Addressed X TDM Measures 3 A-3 A-4 O:\PROJECTS\7001 - 7500\7487 HOLIDAY INN ROSSLYN AT KEY BRIDGE\GRAPHICS\7487 - GRAPHICS.DWG GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY 15% 10% KEY BRIDGE FRANCIS SCOTT 1 LEE HIGHWAY 2 29 INTERSTATE 4 66 25% 4 5 6 7 STREET LYNN N SITE 8 9 STREET N NASH 10 20% N MOORE STREET 11 N KENT STREET 12 KEY BOULEVARD N FORT MYER N QUINN STREET DRIVE 25% WILSON BOULEVARD 5% 17TH STREET N CLARENDON BOULEVARD Figure 1 Site Location, Study Intersections, and Site Trip Distributions NORTH 1900 North Fort Myer Drive Arlington County, Virginia A-5 O:\PROJECTS\7001 - 7500\7487 HOLIDAY INN ROSSLYN AT KEY BRIDGE\GRAPHICS\7487 GRAPHICS.DWG Figure 2 Sketch Site Plan NORTH 1900 North Fort Myer Drive Arlington County, Virginia A-6 O:\PROJECTS\7001 - 7500\7487 HOLIDAY INN ROSSLYN AT KEY BRIDGE\GRAPHICS\7487 - GRAPHICS.DWG GEORGE WASHINGTON 1. 1401 WILSON BOULEVARD MEMORIAL PARKWAY 2. CENTRAL PLACE 3. 1812 NORTH MOORE STREET KEY BRIDGE 4. 1411 KEY BOULEVARD FRANCIS SCOTT LEE HIGHWAY 29 INTERSTATE 66 N LYNN STREET LYNN N SITE STREET N NASH 4 N MOORESTREET 3 N KENT STREET KEY BOULEVARD 2 N FORT MYER N QUINN STREET 1 DRIVE WILSON BOULEVARD 17TH STREET N CLARENDON BOULEVARD Figure 3 Pipeline Development Locations NORTH 1900 North Fort Myer Drive Arlington County, Virginia A-7 Table 1 1900 Fort Myer Drive Trip Generation Analysis ITE Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Land Use Code Size Units In Out Total In Out Total ADT Existing Use Hotel ‐ Center City Core 310 307 Rooms 50 57 107 63 60 123 1,685 Proposed Use Multifamily Residential (High‐Rise) ‐ Center City Core 220 543 DU 45 74 119 73 52 125 1,173 Hotel ‐ Center City Core 310 351 Rooms 58 65 123 71 69 140 1,927 Retail (Shopping Center) ‐ Dense Multi‐Use Urban 2 820 12,900 SF 17 14 31 32 31 63 630 Subtotal 120 153 273 176 152 328 3,730 Difference (Existing vs Proposed) 70 96 166 113 92 205 2,045 Notes: 1. Trip Generation based on ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 2. Trip generation calculated using retail use to be conservative. Likely uses include a hotel restaurant (7,200 SF) and community civic space (5,700 SF). A-8 Table 2 1900 N. Fort Myer Drive ‐ Holiday Inn Roadway Growth Rate1 Street Name Street Name Year Nash Street N. Fort Myer Drive Volume Difference % change Volume Difference % change 2013 2500 14000 0 0.0% ‐1000 ‐7.1% 2014 2500 13000 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2015 2500 13000 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2016 2500 13000 0 0.0% 1000 7.7% 2017 2500 14000 % change per year 0.0% % change per year 0.1% 1. AADT volumes obtained from VDOT [lastest 5‐year data available] A-9 1900 Fort Myer Drive Multimodal Traffic Impact Analysis August 8, 2019 APPENDIX B PARKING OCCUPANCY TABULATION Lee Highway - 29 A BCD N. Fort Myer Drive N. Nash Street 19th Street North E Key Boulevard F GH I N. Oak Street N. Nash Street B-1 Parking Occupancy Count Surveyor: Agan # 7487 Hours: 6-10am and 4-7pm Date: 11-Apr Weather: clear Lots Lot A Lot B Lot C Lot D Lot E Lot F Lot G Lot H Lot I Lot J Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars AM Total Cars 6:00 AM 3864242010 30 7:00 AM 11055353012 35 8:00 AM 21155463021 39 9:00 AM 41065653122 44 10:00 AM 101265683022 54 4:00 PM 4954253030 35 5:00 PM 5855372020 37 6:00 PM 9955492030 46 7:00 PM 11955692040 51 Total Spcs.
Recommended publications
  • Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia
    ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 06-27 District of Columbia CASE NO.06-27 57A2 Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 3: Courthouse Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 4: Crystal City Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 5: Dunn-Loring-Merrifield Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 6: Eisenhower Avenue and King Street Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 7: Farragut West Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 8: Friendship Heights Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 9: Gallery Place-Chinatown Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 57A2 Figure 10: Grosvenor-Strathmore Station Area Sites ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 11: New Carrollton Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 12: Silver Spring Station Area Sites 57A2 MJ Station Entrance/Exit • Office c::J Residential ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 13: U Street/African American Civil War Memoriai/Cardozo Station Area Sites 57A2 3. Data Collection At each site, data about the travel characteristics of individuals who work, live, shop or use the sites were collected through a series of questionnaires conducted through self-administered survey forms and oral intercept interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Analyzed the Vehicle Monitoring Data for This Event
    WMSC Commissioner Brief: W-0034 – Fatality at Farragut West Station December 9, February201 2019 Prepared for Washington Metrorail Safety Commission meeting on August 4, 2020 Safety event summary: A customer jumped from the Farragut West platform to the track bed as outbound Blue Line Train 406 entered the station on Track 2 on December 9, 2019 at approximately 12:53 p.m. Upon report of the collision, Metro Transit Police and D.C. Fire EMS were called and third rail power was de- energized on Track 2 at 12:55 p.m. Power was de-energized to Track 1 at 1:07 p.m. Service resumed after 3 p.m. Probable Cause: The customer intentionally placed themselves in front of oncoming train. Corrective Actions: None planned in specific response to this event. Train 3166 broken TWC antenna repaired. Staff recommendation: Adopt final report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Safety & Environmental Management FINAL REPORT OF INVESTIGATION A&I E19675 SMS 20191209#84904 Date of Event: 12/09/2019 Type of Event: Collision (Fatality) Incident Time: 12:54 hrs. Location: Farragut West Station, Track 2 Time and How received by SAFE: 12/09/2019 - 12:55 hrs. - SAFE on-call phone WMSC Notification: 12/09/2019 - 13:09 hrs. WMSC on-call phone Responding Safety officers: WMATA SAFE: Yes, SAFE 203 WMSC: No Other: N/A Rail Vehicle: (L) 3166.3167 x 3114.3115 x 3156.3157 Injuries: Fatal Injury Damage: Car 3166 Broken TWC Antenna Emergency Responders: Metro Transit Police Department (MTPD), Office of Car Maintenance (CMNT), Office of Rail Transportation (RTRA), DC Fire and EMS (DCFD), Safety and Environmental Management (SAFE), Track and Structure (TRST).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Financial Report FY2017 -- Fourth Quarter April -- June 2017
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Fiscal Year 2017 Financials Quarterly Financial Report FY2017 ---Fourth Quarter April ---June 2017 Page 1 of 62 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FY2017 --- Q4 April --- June 2017 _________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section Page Key Financial Performance Indicators 3 Operating and Capital Budget Summaries 8 Operating Financials by Mode 26 Parking Facility Usage 30 Capital Expenditures 32 Jurisdictional Balances on Account 41 Grants Activity 43 Contract Activity 45 Page 2 of 62 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FY2017 --- Q4 April --- June 2017 _________________________________________________________________ Key Financial Performance Indicators Page 3 of 62 Page 4 of 62 REVENUE AND RIDERSHIP 4th Quarter FY2017 REVENUE (in Millions) FY2016 Actual FY2017 Budget FY2017 Actual $85M 81 81 $80M 80 79 79 78 78 78 78 76 $75M 75 72 72 72 72 70 70 $70M 70 69 69 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 65 65 65 65 $65M 64 63 63 60 $60M 60 59 59 $55M $50M Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Cumulative Revenue Variance $0M (17.0) -$50M (27.0) (36.6) (45.6) (55.9) (64.6) (69.8) -$100M (76.9) (86.9) (103.0) (109.5) -$150M (116.3) RIDERSHIP (trips in Thousands) Q4 Q4-FY2016 Q4-FY2017 Variance FY17 Actual Actual Budget Prior Year Budget Metrorail 48,768 47,336 54,466 -3% -13% Metrobus 32,142 30,514 35,118 -5% -13% MetroAccess 595 607 618 2% -2% System Total 81,504 78,457 90,202 -4% -13%
    [Show full text]
  • 38B Map and Timetable
    How to use this timetable Effective 12-18-16 ➤ Use the map to find the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will travel. Along the top of the schedule, Ballston-Farragut Square Line find the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to find the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. Serves these locations- ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the Brinda servicio a estas ubicaciones time shown for the bus stop before it as the time to wait at the stop. l Ballston-MU station ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed l Clarendon station in ALL CAPS on the schedule. l Court House station Rosslyn station Cómo Usar este Horario l ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las l Georgetown paradas más cercanas a donde se l Farragut North station subirá y bajará del autobús. l Farragut West station ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel Study
    FARRAGUT NORTH AND FARRAGUT WEST PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY TUNNEL STUDY Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (BPPD) August 23, 2004 Prepared By: Parsons KGP Design Studio Basile Baumann Prost & Associates Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION and DESCRIPTION of PROJECT 5 II. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION OPTIONS 6 A. Connections at Farragut West 6 B. Connections at Farragut North 7 C. Pedestrian Tunnel Options 7 1. Option 1 – Pedestrian Tunnel 8 2. Option 2 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Moving Walkway 8 3. Option 3 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Commercial Space 8 III. CODES and DATA 9 IV. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS and DECISION PROCESS 9 A. Initial Scope and Alternatives 9 1. Alternative 1: Pedestrian Tunnel to Existing Mezzanines in North and West 10 2. Alternative 2: Pedestrian Tunnel to South End of Farragut North and Existing Mezzanine at Farragut West 10 B. Entrances To the Tunnel 11 C. Farragut North – South Entrance to Platform Options, Alternative 2 and All Options 11 D. Farragut West – Station Entrance and Platform Elevators, All Alternatives and Options 12 E. Decision Process 12 V. STRUCTURAL FEATURES 13 A. Modification of Farragut North Station 13 B. Modification of Farragut West Station 15 C. Relocation of Vent Shaft at 17th Street 15 D. Tunnel Construction Method 16 E. Emergency Egress of Passageway 16 VI. MECHANICAL FEATURES A. General Mechanical Issues Common to All Options 17 1. Passageway Air Conditioning 17 2. Vent Shaft Relocation 18 3. Station Mechanical Room Modifications 18 4. Fire Protection 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Metro 2017 − 2026 Cip
    METRO METRO METRO 2017 − 2026 CIP Metro Funding Project Description The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA/Metro) is a unique federal-state-local partnership formed to provide mass transit service to the Washington Metropolitan region. WMATA's Adopted FY 2017 - FY 2022 Capital Budget consists of $6.0 billion of critical system projects necessary to maintain the Metrobus, Metrorail, and Metroaccess systems over the next six years. The program focuses heavily on replacement / rehab of the system's aging rail infrastructure with minimal enhancement investments. Also included is the funding of an additional 220 7000-series railcars and associated rail power system upgrades. These additional railcars will be used to retire all 192 of the original 5000-series railcars, one of the most unreliable series in the current fleet. The remaining 28 railcars will be used for minimal capacity expansion along the red line. Funding for the WMATA capital program is from a combination of state, federal, regional and local sources. For Arlington, the total adopted six-year funding commitment is approximately $186 million, consisting of $106 million of annual subsidy payments, and $80 million of planned debt issuance by WMATA. Over ten-years, Arlington has programmed $280 million, with increased funding in the out-years primarily for service expansion projects. This fully funds Arlington's baseline funding of WMATA, and funds $55 million of planned debt issuance based on historical capital program execution rates. A combination of general obligation bonds, state grants and regional gas tax are used to fund Arlington's share of WMATA subsidy. A new multi-year capital funding agreement is currently being drafted among WMATA contributing jurisdictions to cover fiscal years 2018 -2023 and is anticipated to begin in the fall of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballston-Farragut Square Line fi Nd the Stop at Or Nearest the Point Where You Will Get on the Bus
    How to use this timetable English-Español ➤ Use the map to fi nd the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will travel. Along the top of the schedule, Ballston-Farragut Square Line fi nd the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to fi nd the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the time shown for the bus stop before it as the time to wait at the stop. ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed Serves these locations- in ALL CAPS on the schedule. Brinda servicio a estas ubicaciones Cómo Usar este Horario Ballston-MU station Clarendon station ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las Court House station paradas más cercanas a donde se Rosslyn station subirá y bajará del autobús. Georgetown ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, Farragut North station sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. Farragut West station A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 a Partir Del Domingo, 23 De Agosto De 2020
    Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 A partir del domingo, 23 de agosto de 2020 59 For route and schedule information 14th Street Limited Line 59 Call 202-637-7000 14th Street Limited Line www.wmata.com TAKOMA STATION CARROLL ST GEORGIAAVE BUTTERNUT ST ASPEN ST ST 4TH 13TH PL 13TH Legend — Metrorail Station 14TH ST 14TH — Terminal Stands — Serves Only FORT STEVENS DR Selected Stops MISSOURI AVE COLORADO AVE JEFFERSON ST GALLATIN ST IOWA AVE BUCHANAN ST UPSHUR ST 14TH ST 14TH SPRING RD PARK RD MONROE ST IRVING ST COLUMBIA HEIGHTS STATION CHAPIN ST BELMONT ST U ST P ST RHODE ISLAND AVE 14TH ST 14TH McPHERSON K ST SQUARE STATION T I ST S METRO CENTER 13TH STATION F ST FEDERAL ST 12TH TRIANGLE 10TH ST Page 1 of 4 STATION CONSTITUTION AVE WMATA ©2018 For information regarding this map contact <R•A•D•S>. Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 59 A partir del domingo, 23 de agosto de 2020 14th Street Limited Line Southbound To Federal Triangle Monday thru Friday — De Lunes a viernes (except holidays - excepto los días festivos) 14th 14th 10th St. & & & Irving I Pennsylvania 14th Sts. Sts. Ave. St. 14th NW 14th NW NW 14th & & (Columbia & (McPherson (FEDERAL & Colorado Buchanan U Takoma Heights) Square) TRIANGLE) Route Aspen Sts. Ave. Sts. Sts. Number NW NW NW NW AM Service — Servicio matutino 59 6:21 6:27 6:34 6:37 6:45 6:50 6:57 7:03 59 6:36 6:42 6:49 6:52 7:00 7:05 7:12 7:18 59 6:51 6:57 7:04 7:07 7:15 7:20 7:27 7:33 59 7:06 7:12 7:19 7:22 7:30 7:35 7:42 7:48 59 7:11 7:18 7:26 7:31 7:45 7:51 8:01 8:07 59 7:26 7:33 7:41 7:46 8:00 8:06 8:16 8:22 59 7:37
    [Show full text]
  • Hours of Operations and Directions to the Court of Federal Claims in the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building 717 Madison Place, NW Washington, DC 20005
    Hours of Operations and Directions to the Court of Federal Claims in the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building 717 Madison Place, NW Washington, DC 20005 Hours: The Clerk's office is open from 8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. Location: The National Courts Building is located on Madison Place between Pennsylvania Avenue and H Street, Northwest, on the east side of Lafayette Square across from the White House, in downtown Washington, DC. The Treasury Department, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and St. John’s Church and Parish House are nearby. Landmarks: The Dolley Madison House, the former Cosmos Club, and the Tayloe House. They are adjacent to the National Court Building and are actually part of the courthouse complex. Metrorail: Take metro’s Blue Line (Franconia-Springfield) or the Orange Line (Vienna-Fairfax) to the McPherson Square Station. Follow the exit signs toward the White House. At the street level take Vermont Avenue (go left at the top of the escalator) in the direction of H Street. Crossing H Street, Vermont Avenue becomes Madison Place. The National Courts Building’s main entrance is mid-block on the east side of the street. By Car: From the North I-95 and the Baltimore-Washington Parkway connect with I-495/95 (Capital Beltway). Follow Baltimore-Washington Parkway, which becomes New York Avenue, into the downtown area. MD97 (Georgia Avenue) to 16th Street also provides a direct connection to the downtown area. From the South I-95 connects directly with I-395 (Shirley Highway) for easy Click access to the 14th Street corridor downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • FTA WMATA Safety Oversight Inspection Reports June 2018
    Inspection Form FOIA Exemption: All (b)(6) Form FTA-IR-1 United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Agency/Department Information YYYY MM DD Inspection Date Report Number 20180601-WMATA-WP-1 2018 06 01 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Rail Agency Rail Agency Name TRPM Sub- Department Authority Department Name Email Office Phone Mobile Phone Rail Agency Department Contact Information Inspection Location B-Line, Track 1, between Union Station (B03) and Metro Center (A01) Inspection Summary Inspection Activity # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Activity Code TP-JSB-OBS TP-WI-OBS Inspection Units 1 1 Inspection Subunits 1 1 Defects (Number) 0 11 Recommended Finding No No Remedial Action Required1 No Yes Recommended Reinspection No Yes Activity Summaries Inspection Activity # 1 Inspection Subject Job Safety Briefing Activity Code TP JSB OBS Job Briefing Accompanied Out Brief 1000- Outside Employee WMATA RWIC Yes Yes Time No Inspector? Conducted 1400 Shift Name/Title Related Reports N/A Related CAPS / Findings N/A Ref Rule or SOP Standard Other / Title Checklist Reference Related Rules, SOPs, RWPM R-17-02 Standards, or Other MSRPH R-17-03 Main RTA FTA Yard Station OCC At-grade Tunnel Elevated N/A Track Facility Office Inspection Location Track Type X X Track Chain Marker From To Line(s) B-Line N/A Number and/or Station(s) Union Station (B03) Union Station (B03) Head Car Number Number of Cars Vehicles Equipment N/A N/A N/A 1 The rail transit agency must provide FTA with the necessary evidence (e.g. maintenance work order system records, photos, documentation, records, data, or other evidence) to close out the Remedial Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Program Progress Report
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANS IT AUTHORITY Capital Improvement Program Progress Report Published Fiscal Year 2020 Quarter 4 September 25, 2020 OVERVIEW Metro’s Capital Improvement Program Metro’s FY2020-FY2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) totals $9.45 billion with funding from the federal government, state and local contributions, and other sources. Metro's FY2020 capital budget, as amended by the Board of Directors on June 27, 2019, is $1.76 billion. The six-year CIP is focused on safety, state of good repair, and system preservation requirements identified in the Capital Needs Forecast (CNF). The plan also includes targeted investments to drive operating efficiency and improvements that will support service reliability, sustainability, and customer experience. Metro’s capital program is grouped into six major Investment Categories: Railcar, Rail Systems, Track & Structures Rehabilitation, Stations & Passenger Facilities, Bus & Paratransit, and Business Support. Reporting Requirements The Capital Funding Agreement (CFA) and each of the Dedicated Funding (DF) agreements require Metro to report quarterly on progress in use of funding for capital investments. This Capital Improvement Progress report provides information consistent with the requirements of those agreements. This report includes a narrative summary of capital investment highlights through the most recent quarter and financial tables detailing capital expenditures, jurisdictional contributions, fund sources aligned to capital projects, changes to the current year
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]