DOCSLIB.ORG

Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Annual Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Annual Summary Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Annual Summary Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport AIRCRAFT NOISE AND OPERATIONS REPORT 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY Table of Contents and Summary of Reports Aircraft Noise Report Page 1 This report details the locations of all complaints for the reporting period. Comparisons include state, county and areas within each county. Total Complaints & Operations Comparison Page 2 This report compares the total calls for the reporting period to the previous years. It also compares the total annual calls with the total number of annual operations for each year. Complaints by Category Page 3 Complaints received for the reporting period are further detailed by fourteen types of complaints, concerns or questions. A complainant may have more than one complaint, concern or question per occurrence. Frequent Complainants Page 4 This report shows the number of complaints made by the most frequent/repeat complainants for the reporting period. Complaint Locations Page 5 This report shows the locations of the complainants on a map and the total number of complaints and complainants for the reporting period. Total Runway Usage - All Aircraft Page 6 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of departures and arrivals on each runway for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Large Jets Page 7 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of large jet departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Small Jets and Props Page 8 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of small jet and prop departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for the reporting period. Airline Operations Report Page 9 This report provides a breakdown of the operations by airline for the reporting period. Community Noise Monitoring Program Report Page 10 This report details the noise monitoring locations and results for the reporting period. Notes Page Page 11 The notes page provides additional information and/or definitions to better understand one or more of the reports listed above. A particular report may show a note number at the bottom of the page for reference. 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY AIRCRAFT NOISE REPORT KENTUCKY CALLS 73 KENTUCKY CALLS CONT'D OHIO CALLS 87 Boone County 54 Kenton County 15 Hamilton County 85 Burlington 9 Covington 2 Anderson Township 1 Dartmouth Woods 4 Crescent Springs 2 Cincinnati 2 Dilcrest 5 Elsmere 1 Cleves 2 Florence 8 Erlanger 1 Colerain Township 1 Hebron 3 Fort Mitchell 1 Delhi Township 9 Oakbrook 10 Taylor Mill 2 Green Township 10 Parlor Grove 3 Villa Hills 6 Miami Township 1 Petersburg 1 Mount Lookout 28 Treetops 3 INDIANA CALLS 22 Mount Washington 11 Union 3 Dearborn County 22 North Bend 1 Walton 5 Aurora 3 North College Hill 1 Campbell County 4 Hidden Valley Lakes 9 Sayler Park 13 Fort Thomas 1 Lawrenceburg 4 Springfield Township 4 Wilder 3 Moores Hill 6 Westwood 1 Butler County 1 Mason 1 Warren County 1 Loveland 1 County Comparison Butler Warren 0% Dearborn 1% 12% Boone 30% Campbell 2% Hamilton Kenton 47% 8% Page 1 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY TOTAL COMPLAINTS & OPERATIONS YEAR TOTAL CALLS OPERATIONS 1991* 3,393 297,425 1992 5,709 305,544 1993 3,256 312,204 1994 2,734 339,839 1995 2,500 365,114 1996 1,717 401,367 1997 2,118 417,391 1998** 3,444 442,276 1999 1,601 476,128 2000 1,384 461,454 2001 1,626 376,744 2002 978 486,501 2003 933 490,284 2004 1,550 517,520 2005 767 496,366 2006 1,187 345,754 2007 432 328,069 2008 232 284,487 2009 344 220,323 2010 486 174,982 2011 398 159,060 2012 414 141,372 2013 449 135,492 2014 182 131,695 TOTAL 37,834 8,107,391 * Total Calls included September - December, 1991 ** 1,845 Calls were made by one caller Total Calls Versus Operations Total Calls Operations YEARS Note: Graph shown is not using the same numeric scale for Total Calls and Total Operations but is designed to show correlation between Total Calls and Total Operations. Note 5 Page 2 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY COMPLAINTS BY CATEGORY Number of Complaints Percentage Category Description and/or Questions Comparison Aircraft Noise 170 28.81% Low Flying Aircraft 98 16.61% Frequent Over Flights 61 10.34% New Aircraft Activity 41 6.95% House Vibration 49 8.31% Engine Pollution 7 1.19% Aircraft Off Track 32 5.42% Distrubed Rest/Sleep 118 20.00% Engine Test/Run-Up 4 0.68% Safety Concerns 0 0.00% Mitigation Questions 5 0.85% Techical Questions 0 0.00% Relocating to Area 4 0.68% Other 1 0.17% TOTAL 590 100.00% Complaints by Category 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 Number of ComplaintsNumber of 40 20 0 Categories The total number of complaints will not equal the total number of calls for the year. A caller may have more than one complaint or question per call. Page 3 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY FREQUENT COMPLAINANTS PERCENT OF NUMBER OF CALLER STATE CITY OR AREA RUNWAY TOTAL COMPLAINTS COMPLAINTS Lunken, Ovrflts, 1 OH Mount Lookout 27 15% 27 Arrivals 36L Arrivals 2 KY Oakbrook 10 5% 18C Departures Lunken, Ovrflts, 3 OH Mount Washington 10 5% 27 Arrivals 09 Arrivals 4 IN Hidden Valley Lakes 95% 27 Departures 09 Arrivals 5 IN Moores Hill 63% 27 Departures 27 Arrivals 6 KY Villa Hills 42% 09 Departures 18R Arrivals 7 OH Sayler Park 42% 36C Departures 18C Arrivals 8 OH Delhi Township 42% 36C Departures 09 Arrivals 9 KY Burlington 42% 27 Departures 36C Arrivals 10 KY Walton 42% 18C Departures 36R Arrivals 11 KY Dilcrest 42% 18L Departures TOTALS 86 47% TOTALS Total 2014 Complaints 182 Total 2014 Complainants 93 Page 4 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY COMPLAINT LOCATIONS TOTALS Total 2014 Complaints 182 Total 2014 Complainants 93 Note 1 Page 5 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY TOTAL RUNWAY USAGE - ALL AIRCRAFT 514 1% 15,856 24% 19,167 5 29% 0% 3,095 18R 5% 18C 5,342 8% 18L 8,735 39,716 09 27 32 6,131 13% 60% 0% 9% 36L 5 0% 36C 36R 3,038 5% 102 14,792 0% 22% 6,072 10% 9,093 14% TOTALS: 65,670 Arrivals 66,025 Departures ARRIVALS DEPARTURES Notes 2 & 5 Page 6 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY NIGHTTIME USAGE BY LARGE JETS 1 0% 291 3% 6 0 0% 0% 713 18R 8% 18C 31 1% 18L 6,669 8,019 09 27 12 3,928 59% 90% 0% 35% 36L 0 0% 36C 36R 107 1% 0 12 0% 0% 344 3% 72 0% Nighttime hours are between 10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m. ARRIVALS TOTALS: 11,311 Arrivals 8,894 Departures DEPARTURES Notes 2, 3, & 5 Page 7 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY NIGHTTIME USAGE BY SMALL JETS & PROPS 74 1% 422 7% 33 0 1% 0% 1,171 18R 30% 18C 18 0% 18L 1,850 2,088 09 27 4 1,046 32% 54% 0% 18% 36L 0 0% 36C 36R 71 2% 0 546 0% 14% 424 8% 1,859 33% Nighttime hours are between 10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m. ARRIVALS TOTALS 5,708 Arrivals 3,898 Departures DEPARTURES Notes 2, 3, & 5 Page 8 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY AIRLINE OPERATIONS REPORT ANNUAL ARRIVALS & PERCENTAGE AIRLINE DEPARTURES COMPARSION Delta Connection Carriers* 46,061 34.98% DHL 21,787 16.54% Delta Air Lines 14,327 10.88% United Airlines and Regional Affiliates 12,882 9.78% US Airways and Regional Affiliates 11,241 8.54% American Airlines and Regional Affilliates 10,915 8.29% Other ** 5,741 4.36% AmeriFlight Inc. 2,387 1.81% Frontier Airlines 1,913 1.45% Air Canada and Regional Affiliates 1,080 0.82% Federal Express a/k/a FedEx 1,049 0.80% Allegiant Air 842 0.64% Ultimate Air Shuttle 724 0.55% Castle Aviation, Inc. 514 0.39% Netjets Aviation, Inc. 232 0.18% TOTAL 131,695 100.00% Frontier Airlines Air Canada and Regional AmeriFlight Inc. Affiliates Delta Connection Carriers* DHL Other ** Federal Express a/k/a FedEx Delta Air Lines American Airlines and Allegiant Air United Airlines and Regional Affiliates Regional Affilliates Ultimate Air Shuttle US Airways and Regional Affiliates Netjets Aviation, Inc. US Airways and Regional Castle Aviation, Inc. Affiliates American Airlines and Regional Affilliates Other ** United Airlines and Regional Affiliates AmeriFlight Inc. Frontier Airlines Air Canada and Regional Affiliates Federal Express a/k/a FedEx Delta Connection Carriers* Allegiant Air Delta Air Lines Ultimate Air Shuttle DHL Castle Aviation, Inc. Netjets Aviation, Inc. * Other Delta Connection Carriers include Chautauqua, Compass, Express Jet, GoJet, Sky West, Shuttle America, Endeavor and Delta Private Jets. ** Other airlines include charters, general aviation, corporate, smaller cargo operations and military. Note 5 Page 9 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY COMMUNITY NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM Map Community & Aircraft Only NMT Location Monitoring Period Code Aircraft DNL DNL A Sisters of Charity, Delhi Township, Ohio March 18 - 20, 2014 n/a 53.5 A Sisters of Charity, Delhi Township, Ohio June 17 - 19, 2014 n/a 52.3 A Sisters of Charity, Delhi Township, Ohio September 9 - 11, 2014 n/a 54.0 A Sisters of Charity, Delhi Township, Ohio December 2 - 4, 2014 n/a 54.8 A * The notation n/a means that the DNL calculation was not included in the report. Page 10 2014 ANNUAL SUMMARY NOTES PAGE Note 1 On the Caller Locations map, some caller location boxes may overlap depending on the proximity of different callers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June
    Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport AIRCRAFT NOISE AND OPERATIONS REPORT 2014 BI-ANNUAL SUMMARY JANUARY - JUNE Table of Contents and Summary of Reports Aircraft Noise Report Page 1 This report details the locations of all complaints for the reporting period. Comparisons include state, county and areas within each county. Quarterly & Annual Comparison of Complaints Page 2 This report shows the trends of total complaints comparing the previous five years by quarter to the current year. Complaints by Category Page 3 Complaints received for the reporting period are further detailed by fourteen types of complaints, concerns or questions. A complainant may have more than one complaint, concern or question per occurrence. Complaint Locations and Frequent Complainants Page 4 This report shows the locations of the complainants on a map and the number of complaints made by the most frequent/repeat complainants for the reporting period. Total Runway Usage - All Aircraft Page 5 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of departures and arrivals on each runway for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Large Jets Page 6 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of large jet departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Small Jets and Props Page 7 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of small jet and prop departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • FY18 Airport Statements
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL OF REPORT THE AIRPORT For the fiscal years ended ENTERPRISE FUND June 30, 2018 & 2017 An enterprise fund of the City of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS International Airport NORTH CAROLINA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 As of June 30, 2018: MAYOR: Vi Alexander Lyles MAYOR PRO TEM: Julie Eiselt CITY COUNCIL Dimple Ajmera LaWana Mayfield Tariq Bokhari James Mitchell Jr. Edmund H Driggs Matt Newton Larken Egleston Greg Phipps Justin Harlow Braxton Winston II CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE Marcus D. Jones, City Manager Robert D. Campbell, Acting Chief Financial Officer & Finance Director CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Brent Cagle, Airport Chief Executive Officer Michael Hill, Airport Chief Financial Officer An enterprise fund of the City of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC Charlotte Douglas International Airport … For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 … 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 INTRODUCTORY SECTION 8 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 23 CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING 25 FINANCIAL SECTION 26 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR 27 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 28 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 28 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 29 OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 39 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 40 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION 43 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION 44 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 46 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 73 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'
    [Show full text]
  • $350,000,000 the INDIANAPOLIS LOCAL, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND BANK Goldman, Sachs & Co. Jpmorgan
    NEW ISSUE RATINGS: See "RATINGS" herein Book-Entry-Only In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana ("Bond Counsel"), under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2008 Bonds (hereinafter defined) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect on the date of issuance of the 2008 Bonds (the "Code"), except for interest on any 2008 Bond for any period during which such 2008 Bond is owned by a person who is a "substantial user" of the Airport System (hereinafter defined) or a "related person" as defined in Section 147(a) of the Code. Such exclusion is conditioned on continuing compliance with the Tax Covenants (hereinafter defined). The interest on the 2008 Bonds is a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes. In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2008 Bonds is exempt from income taxation in the State of Indiana. See "TAX MATTERS" and APPENDIX C—"FORM OF APPROVING OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL" herein. $350,000,000 THE INDIANAPOLIS LOCAL, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND BANK VARIABLE RATE BONDS, SERIES 2008C (INDIANAPOLIS AIRPORT AUTHORITY PROJECT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover The Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank (the "Bond Bank") will issue its Variable Rate Bonds, Series 2008C (Indianapolis Airport Authority Project), in seven separate sub-series, as shown on the inside cover (collectively, the "2008 Bonds"), pursuant to the Trust Indenture, dated as of June 1,2008 (the "Indenture"), between the Bond Bank and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Airlines U.S Service Trends
    Alabama Summary of scheduled passenger air service 6 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • BHM (Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International) -2% departures / -4% seats • DHN (Dothan Regional) -1% departures / -1% seats • HSV (Huntsville International-Carl T Jones Field) -11% departures / -6% seats • MGM (Montgomery Regional) -16% departures / -8% seats • MOB (Mobile Regional) -5% departures / +5% seats • MSL (Northwest Alabama Regional *EAS) +101% departures / -52% seats Overall: departures down -5% and seats down -4% Regional airlines provide 76% of Alabama passenger air service 11 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to • ExpressJet, PSA, Mesa, SkyWest, Endeavor, Air Wisconsin, Envoy, Trans States, GoJet, Republic, Piedmont State Economic Impact of Small Community Air Service in 2015: $3.6 billion & 41,000 jobs (InterVISTAS Consulting LLC) Source: RAA Analysis of Oliver Wyman PlaneStats OAG schedule data November 2017 Alaska Summary of scheduled passenger air service 213 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • DIO (Little Diomede Heliport) lost all air service in 2013 • KKU (Ekuk Airport) lost all air service in 2015 Overall: departures down -9% and seats down -1% Regional airlines: • provide exclusive air service to 94% of Alaska’s airports • provide 89% of Alaska passenger air service (departures) • carried 34% of Alaska passengers in 2016 4 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to Alaska • Corvus Airlines dba Ravn Alaska, Horizon, Compass, SkyWest Corvus Airlines, Inc. dba Ravn
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Us Master Pilot Scablist the Unionist's Edition
    THIS IS THE US MASTER PILOT SCABLIST THE UNIONIST’S EDITION A SCAB is A Person Who is Doing What You’d be Doing if You Weren’t on Strike. A SCAB takes your job, a Job he could not get under normal circumstances. He can only advance himself by taking advantage of labor disputes and walking over the backs of workers trying to maintain decent wages and working conditions. He helps management to destroy his and your profession, often ending up under conditions he/she wouldn't even have scabbed for. No matter. A SCAB doesn't think long term, nor does he think of anything other then himself. His smile shows fangs that drip with your blood, for he willingly destroys families, lives, careers, opportunities and professions at the drop of a hat. He takes from a striker what he knows he could never earn by his own merit: a decent Job. He steals that which others earned at the bargaining table through blood, sweat and tears, and throws it away in an instant - ruining lives, jobs and careers. ONCE A SCAB, ALWAYS A SCAB - NEVER FORGET! Below are brief notes about legal strikes by organized pilots. 1. Century Airlines 1932: Pilots struck to resist wage reduction by E.L Cord, the patron saint of Frank Lorenzo. 2. TWA 1946: Pilots struck over pay on faster 4 engine aircraft, limited by the provisions of Decision 83. 3. National Airlines 1948: Strike over aircraft safety and repeated violations of the labor contract. 4. Western Airlines 1958: Qualifications of the Flight Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Houston
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT NEW ISSUES – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Fitch: “A+” S&P: “A” SEE “RATINGS” HEREIN In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i) (A) interest on the Series 2012A Bonds (as defined below) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes except for any period a Series 2012A Bond is held by a person who, within the meaning of section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, is a “substantial user” or a “related person” to a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or refinanced with the proceeds of the Series 2012A Bonds, as described under “TAX MATTERS” herein, and (B) interest on the Series 2012A Bonds is an item of tax preference that is includable in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of determining the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, and (ii) (A) interest on the Series 2012B Bonds (as defined below) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and (B) interest on the Series 2012B Bonds is not an item of tax preference that is includable in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of determining the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. See “TAX MATTERS” herein for a discussion of the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, including a description of alternative minimum tax consequences for corporations holding Series 2012B Bonds. $503,720,000 CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS Airport System consisting of $286,585,000 $217,135,000 SUBORDINATE Lien REvenue SUBORDINATE Lien REvenue Refunding Bonds, Refunding Bonds, Series
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Airways Reconnects Arkansas
    BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | WASHINGTON, D.C. Southern Airways reconnects Arkansas Harrison/ Branson Memphis Hot Springs Dallas/ El Dorado Ft.Worth ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT HARRISON, ARKANSAS UNDER 49 U.S.C. § 41731 ET SEQ. BY ORDER 2020-7-9 | DOT-OST-1997-2935 Proposal to Provide Subsidized Correspondence with regard Essential Air Service to this document should be By Order 2020-7-9, the Department addressed to: requested proposals from carriers R. Stan Little interested in providing Essential Air CHAIRMAN & CEO Service to Harrison, Arkansas. 101 North Riverside Drive; Suite 211 Pursuant to that Order, Southern Pompano Beach, Florida 33062 Airways Express LLC (“Southern”) (901) 672-7820 cordially submits this proposal. [email protected] America’s Most Reliable Commuter Airline Southern Airways Express hereby offers a proposal to continue as the air service provider at the Boone County Airport. The proposal is for a period of two or four years. The Southern Story In less than eight years, Southern Airways for acquisition. On February 29, 2016, Southern Express has become one of the largest acquired Sun Air Express. Throughout that year, commuter airlines in America and a leader in Southern worked closely with those incumbent the field of Essential Air Service. Of the nearly EAS communities to facilitate rebranding and 200 daily flights operated by Southern, almost to renew the contracts for another bid cycle. half are contracted through the Essential Air In the process, Southern gained additional EAS Service program. Much of Southern’s success contracts in the region and also in the State of can be attributed to targeted expansion to gain Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Charlotte
    NEW ISSUE Ratings: FULL BOOK-ENTRY Moody’s: “Aa3” Fitch: “AA-” (See “MISCELLANEOUS-Ratings” herein) In the opinion of Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law (1) assuming compliance by the City with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (a) interest on the 2017A Bonds and the 2017C Bonds (i) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and (ii) is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, (b) interest on the 2017B Bonds (i) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except for interest on a 2017B Bond for any period during which such 2017B Bond is held by a person who is a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or refinanced by the 2017B Bonds or a “related person” within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Code, and (ii) is an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, and (2) interest on the 2017 Bonds is exempt from State of North Carolina income taxation. See “TAX TREATMENT” herein. $302,780,000 CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Douglas International Airport $167,385,000 $16,345,000 $119,050,000 Airport Revenue Bonds Airport Revenue Bonds Airport Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2017A (NON-AMT) Series 2017B (AMT) Series 2017C (NON-AMT) Dated: Date of Issuance Due: As shown on inside cover This Official Statement has been prepared by the City of Charlotte, North Carolina (the City“ ”) to provide information on the Bonds offered hereby (the “2017 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • 25760000 INDIANAPOLIS AIRPORT AUTHORITY Siebert Brandford Shank & Co
    NEW ISSUE RATINGS: See “CREDIT RATINGS” Book-Entry-Only In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, and Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana (together, “Co‑Bond Counsel”), under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2010 Bonds (hereinafter defined) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect on the date of issuance of the 2010 Bonds (the “Code”), except for interest on any 2010 Bond for any period during which such 2010 Bond is owned by a person who is a “substantial user” of the Airport System (hereinafter defined) or a “related person” as defined in Section 147(a) of the Code. Such exclusion is conditioned on continuing compliance with the Tax Covenants (hereinafter defined). Interest on the 2010 Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations and is not taken into account in determining adjusted current earnings for the purpose of computing the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations. In addition, in the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2010 Bonds is exempt from income taxation in the State of Indiana. $25,760,000 INDIANAPOLIS AIRPORT AUTHORITY AIRPORT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2010A (Non-AMT) Dated: Date of delivery Due: January 1, as shown on the inside cover page The Indianapolis Airport Authority (the “Authority”) will issue its Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A (the “2010 Bonds”), pursuant to the Ordinance, as defined and described herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Comp Plan
    TRANSPORTATION INTRODUCTION The Transportation Element reflects the changing context of Boone County's transportation network. The text of this element is broken down into three sections: 1. Regional Transportation System (Boone County as an integral part of the Cincinnati metropolitan region), 2. Boone County Transportation Plan, and 3. Transportation/Land Use Connection. 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The Region - The first Transportation Goal emphasizes that the transportation network of the county is a significant component of a regional, metropolitan transportation system. As shown in Figure 11.1, this Greater Cincinnati metropolitan region includes eight counties in three states: Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. The responsibility for transportation planning within this region rests with the Ohio- Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI). OKI's Regional Transportation Plan provides a good history and overview of the transportation network for this region: Transportation facilities have always been important to this region's growth and prosperity. In the late 1700's, the Ohio River supported Cincinnati's emergence as the gateway to the West, a point of convergence for people and goods. In the 1800's, the Miami and Erie Canal and the railroad system established the Cincinnati area as a Figure 11.1 - Greater Cincinnati metropolitan area commercial and transportation center. Today, the region's transportation network includes five interstate highways, an international airport, and a web of arterial highways. As one of the most heavily multi-modal networks in the country, the region's transportation system is invaluable both to the health of the region's economy and the mobility of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradley International Airport Revenue Bonds
    NEW ISSUE In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law (i) assuming continuing compliance with certain covenants and the accuracy of certain representations, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except interest on any Series 2001A Bond for any period during which it is held by a “substantial user” or a “related person,” as those terms are used in Section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and (ii) interest on the Bonds is excluded from the Connecticut income tax on individuals, trusts and estates and from amounts on which the net Connecticut minimum tax is based in the case of individuals, trusts and estates required to pay the federal alternative minimum tax. Interest on the Bonds is included in gross income for purposes of the Connecticut corporation business tax. The Series 2001A Bonds are “private activity bonds” the interest on which is an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. The Series 2001B Bonds are not “private activity bonds” and therefore the interest on those Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. Interest on the Bonds may be subject to certain federal taxes imposed only on certain corporations. For a more complete discussion of the tax aspects, see “TAX MATTERS” herein. $213,180,000 STATE OF CONNECTICUT Bradley International Airport Revenue Bonds COMPRISED OF $194,000,000 $19,180,000 General Airport Revenue Bonds General Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001A (AMT) Series 2001B (Non-AMT) Dated: March 1, 2001 Due: October 1, as shown on the inside cover This Official Statement describes Bradley International Airport (the “Airport”) and other matters relating to the Series 2001A Bonds and Series 2001B Bonds (collectively, the “Bonds”) identified above.
    [Show full text]