<<

Gut 1998;42:845–849 845 Impact of corticotropin-releasing on gastrointestinal motility and adrenocorticotropic Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.42.6.845 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from hormone in normal controls and patients with irritable bowel syndrome

S Fukudo, T Nomura, M Hongo

Abstract tinal motility.56 These phenomena in are Background—Corticotropin-releasing hor- mimicked by intracerebroventricular6–9 or mone (CRH) plays a key role in modulating intravenous9 administration of corticotropin intestinal motility in stressed animals. releasing hormone (CRH) and are blocked by 6–9 Aims—To evaluate the eVect of CRH on the CRH antagonist, á helical CRH9–41. intestinal motility in humans and to Stress induces anxiogenic behaviour in rats and determine whether patients with irritable intracerebroventricular administration of CRH bowel syndrome (IBS) have an exagger- mimics the behavioural changes under stress.10 ated response to CRH. Furthermore, intravenous administration of 11 Subjects—Ten IBS patients diagnosed by CRH decreases slow wave sleep in humans. Rome criteria and 10 healthy controls. These findings led us to hypothesise that Methods—CRH (2 µg/kg) was intrave- CRH plays a major role in the stress response nously administered during duodenal and of humans, both normal subjects and IBS colonic manometry and plasma adreno- patients. The purpose of this study was to corticotropic hormone (ACTH) was determine whether intravenous administration measured by radioimmunoassay. of CRH aVects human gastrointestinal motility Results—CRH induced motility of the and whether CRH discriminates physiological descending colon in both groups (p<0.001) responses in normal control subjects from and induced greater motility indexes in those in IBS patients. IBS patients than in controls (p<0.05). CRH produced duodenal phase III motor Methods

activity in 80% of the subjects and duode- SUBJECTS http://gut.bmj.com/ nal dysmotility in 40% of IBS patients. Ten normal healthy volunteers and 10 IBS Abdominal symptoms evoked by CRH in patients were studied. Both groups consisted of IBS patients lasted significantly longer five men and five women. Ages (controls: 20.7 than those in controls (p<0.05). CRH (0.5) years versus IBS: 23.8 (3.6) years) and induced significant increases in plasma body mass indexes (controls: 21.8 (0.6) versus ACTH levels in both groups (p<0.001) and IBS: 21.0 (1.1)) were almost matched. Control produced significantly higher plasma subjects were paid volunteers who had no symp- on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. ACTH levels in IBS patients than in toms or history of major diseases. IBS patients 12 controls (p<0.001). were diagnosed by the Rome criteria ; they also Conclusion—Human intestinal motility is had recurrent abdominal pain with alternating probably modulated by exogenous CRH. diarrhoea and constipation for more than two The brain-gut in IBS patients may have an years, with temporal exacerbation of these exaggerated response to CRH. symptoms by psychosocial stress. No patient (Gut 1998;42:845–849) had a history of abdominal surgery or evidence Department of of organic disease by diagnostic studies includ- Psychosomatic Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome; corticotropin ing blood tests, urinalysis, stool analyses, plain x Medicine releasing factor; adrenocorticotropic hormone; colonic ray film of the abdomen, barium enema, colon- S Fukudo motility; duodenal motility oscopy, and the lactose tolerance test. Because of T Nomura the unstable bowel habit, our patients were not Department of Stress can alter gastrointestinal function but classified into two subgroups of diarrhoea or Comprehensive the mechamism of the stress induced intestinal constipation. This notion is supported by an Medicine, Tohoku response is still obscure.1 The detail of the earlier study in which these symptoms of IBS fell University School of brain-gut interaction is one of the most impor- into the same principle component in multivari- Medicine, Sendai, tant factors of stress induced intestinal re- ate analysis.13 Informed consent was obtained Japan M Hongo sponse and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is from all subjects and this study was approved by presumed to be a disorder of the brain-gut the Tohoku University Ethics Committee. 2 Correspondence to: link. We have reported that psychological Dr S Fukudo, Department of stress induces colonic segmental contractions CANNULATION AND RECORDING ASSEMBLIES Psychosomatic Medicine, Tohoku University School of and irregular contractile activity (phase II) of Intestinal motility was recorded by previously 4 Medicine, 1–1 Seiryo-machi, the duodenal reported methods. In brief, an assembly Aoba-Ku, Sendai 980–8574, (MMC) in humans and that these responses consisting of three transducers (Sentron, Am- Japan. are exaggerated in IBS patients.34 Wrap sterdam, Netherlands) was inserted into the Accepted for publication restraint stress in rats is also reported to facili- descending colon using colonoscopy at 08.30. 19 January 1998 tate colonic motility and to inhibit small intes- On the evening before colonoscopy, the 846 Fukudo, Nomura, Hongo

Table 1 Influence of CRH on patterns of gastrointestinal motility, abdominal symptoms, chest. A Teflon cannula was inserted into an and duodenal pH arm vein for blood sampling and saline was infused at a speed of 0.5 ml/min. Two pressure Controls Patients with IBS (n=10) (n=10) p Value catheters, the pH sensor, and pick up, were Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.42.6.845 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from connected to an analogue to digital converter Latency of evoked motility (min) Colon 3.0 (0.6) 2.8 (0.8) NS (PC-Polygram, Synectics). The analogue sig- 3.1 (0.5) 3.0 (0.9) nals were sampled at 8 Hz, digitised, entered Occurrence of phase III during first 15 min of into a computer (PC-9801 ES, NEC, Tokyo, Baseline (n) 2 1 NS CRH 8* 8* NS Japan) via fibreoptic cable, and stored on mag- Clustered contractions or other dysmotility netic hard disk for later analysis. after CRH (n) 0 4§ 0.05† Abdominal pain or discomfort during Baseline (n) 0 0 NS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN CRH (n) 2 6 NS The subjects lay on a bed at 11.00 after the Duration of abdominal pain or discomfort (min) 1.3 (1.0) 20.8 (11.5) 0.05‡ above procedures were completed. Respiration, Area below pH 7.0 duodenal pressure, colonic pressure, and duo- Baseline (n) −0.84 (0.17) −0.85 (0.13) NS denal pH were monitored for 240 minutes. The CRH (n) −0.95 (0.24) −0.68 (0.12) NS subjects were instructed to inform the investiga- Data are presented as mean (SE) or number of cases (n). tors of the beginning and the end of abdominal *p<0.05 significant variation by McNemar’s test; †p<0.05 significant diVerence by Fisher’s exact symptoms. These symptoms were notable on test; ‡p<0.05 significant diVerence by the Mann-Whitney U test. §Three cases with clustered contractions and a case with retrograde phase III-like contractions. the motility data record. The experiment consisted of the three periods: the initial 60 subjects ingested a solution composed of 125 minutes for adaptation; the following 60 ml of magnesium citrate (13.6%) and 2.5 mg minutes for baseline; and the last 120 minutes of sodium picosulphate to lessen the faecal for eVect of CRH. Saline (20 ml) was injected at eZuent. Based on an earlier report,14 this bowel 12.00. Human CRH ( Institute, Osaka, preparation was unlikely to aVect the colonic Japan) was dissolved in 20 ml of saline immedi- motility. Another assembly with three trans- ately before the experiment and 2 µg/kg was ducers and a pH sensor (Monocrystant Anti- injected intravenously within one minute at mony, Synectics, Stockholm, Sweden) was 13.00. This is the dose which alters gastrointes- inserted transnasally into the third portion of tinal function in animals9 and increases plasma the duodenum. The position of catheters with- adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secre- out major drift were certified by fluoroscopy tion to stress levels with detectable plasma CRH 15 with x ray before and after the study. These in humans. Furthermore, blood pressure is 16 catheters consisted of three sensors 5 cm apart. known to be unchanged at this dose. Blood (5 The pressure at the following points (distance ml) was drawn from the cannula placed in the

from the mouth or anus) was measured: vein at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after http://gut.bmj.com/ duodenal bulb (60 cm), proximal second CRH injection. Blood was collected into two portion of the duodenum (65 cm), distal tubes: one with EDTA (1 mg/ml) as the first second portion of the duodenum (70 cm), reagent for ACTH assay, and the other without descending colon (60 cm), proximal sigmoid reagent for assay. Plasma and serum colon (55 cm), and mid sigmoid colon (50 cm). were obtained by centrifugation of the samples The sensors were tip transducers made from a at 3000 rpm for five minutes, frozen, and stored at −45°C for later analysis.

semiconductor. The measuring range of the on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. sensors was from −50 mm Hg to 1000 mm Hg, with −3 dB (0–180 Hz) of the frequency prop- DATA ANALYSIS A colonic motility index was calculated by erty. The pH sensor was located in the third measuring the area under the pressure records portion of the duodenum (75 cm). A pneumo- for each 15 minute period using a computer- gram was taken from a pick up belt around the ised planimeter (Gastrosoft).17 Motility index was calculated as follows: motility index = 100 (%) × area under the curve (mm Hg/sec)/(15 × 60 sec). Duodenal motility was analysed by duration of three phases: phase I, period of quiescence; phase II, period of irregular contractile activity; and phase III, period of regular contractile activity with at least three minutes of uninterrupted phasic pressures at the maximum frequency of 11–13 per minute of MMC.18 The timing of CRH injection was in phase I or II at the end of the baseline. Patterns of duodenal dysmotility were defined and analysed as follows. Clustered contractions were groups of phasic waves, occurring at a rate of 10–12 per minute and lasting overall five minutes or longer; individual waves had ampli- Figure 1 Manometric recordings of a normal control subject. R, respiration; D1, duodenal tudes of at least 15 mm Hg, often with some bulb/antrum; D2, proximal second portion of the duodenum; D3, distal second portion of the tonic elevation of the basal pressure.19 Individual duodenum; DC, descending colon; SC1, proximal sigmoid colon; SC2, mid sigmoid colon; clusters were preceded and followed by at least pH, duodenal pH. Note the fine colonic contractions after intravenous CRH. Even though 19 CRH was injected during duodenal phase I immediately after phase III at the end of 30 seconds of quiescence. Retrograde phase baseline, administration of CRH evoked duodenal phase III. III-like contractions were regular contractile EVects of CRH on gastrointestinal motility in IBS 847

200

* Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.42.6.845 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from

100 Plasma ACTH (pg/ml)

0 –30 0 30 60 90 120 Time (min) Figure 2 Manometric findings of a patient with IBS. Abbreviations as for fig 1. µ Administration of CRH stimulated the colon, particularly the descending colon, and evoked CRH (2 g/kg iv) Normal (n = 10) duodenal phase III which was followed by phase II contractions. This patient complained of abdominal pain during the period expressed by a solid bar. IBS (n = 10)

activity at a frequency of 11–13 per minute with Figure 4 EVects of CRH on plasma ACTH. *p<0.05 the retrograde propagation.20 Duodenal pH was versus controls by ScheVe F test and Mann-Whitney U estimated by area under pH 7.0 (pH z sec) test. divided by duration of periods (15 × 60 sec). were prominent in IBS patients (fig 2). Phase Frequency and duration of abdominal pain or III motor activity of the duodenum was signifi- discomfort were calculated from the event cantly evoked by the CRH injection during the marks. The stored samples were defrosted and first 15 minutes in both groups (p<0.05; table levels of plasma ACTH and serum cortisol were 1). After CRH administration, IBS patients measured by radioimmunoassay. The minimal had a significantly higher incidence of duode- detectable value and interassay variability were nal dysmotility and longer duration of abdomi- as follows: ACTH, minimum 4 pg/ml, variability nal symptoms than controls (p<0.05; table 1). 3.89%; cortisol, minimum 0.64 mg/dl, variabil- Duodenal pH was not changed by CRH. ity 2.64%. CHANGES IN MOTILITY INDEXES OF THE COLON STATISTICAL ANALYSIS At baseline, there was no significant diVerence in Data were expressed as mean (SE) unless indi- motility indexes of the descending colon be- http://gut.bmj.com/ cated otherwise. Means of two groups were tween controls (87.2 (29.3)) and IBS patients compared by one way or two way analysis of (101.3 (22.2)). CRH induced a significant variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was car- increase in motility indexes of both groups (con- ried out using ScheVe’s F test, t tests, and non- trols: 274.0 (72.6), IBS patients: 663.5 (251.6), parametric tests. Cross table analysis was used p<0.001) and produced significantly higher for qualitative data. A p value less than 0.05 motility indexes in IBS patients in controls was regarded as significant. (p<0.05), especially in the later time periods (60–120 minutes) after administration of CRH on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Results (for example, during 45–60 minutes, controls: PATTERNS OF GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY AND 118.1 (38.4) versus IBS patients: 430.4 (174.3), DUODENAL pH p<0.05, fig 3). Motility indexes of two sites in At baseline, there was no prominent diVerence the sigmoid colon showed the same pattern but in patterns in colonic or duodenal motility the values were smaller than those of descending between controls and IBS patients. CRH colon (data not shown). There was no signifi- induced segmental contractions in the de- cant correlation between duration of abdominal scending and sigmoid colon within the first 15 pain and colonic motility indexes. minutes in controls (fig 1) and these responses

NEUROENDOCRINE DATA Normal (n = 10) Basal levels of plasma ACTH were almost 1000 IBS (n = 10) identical in both groups (controls: 20.4 (2.5) pg/ml versus IBS patients: 23.3 (2.7) pg/ml). CRH induced a significant increase in plasma ACTH in both groups (p<0.001) and pro- * * duced significantly higher plasma ACTH in 500 * * IBS patients than in controls (p<0.01), espe- cially at 60 minutes after administration (controls: 93.1 (9.2) pg/ml versus IBS patients:

Motility index (mm Hg%) 174.5 (35.1) pg/ml, p<0.05; fig 4). Serum cortisol showed a significant increase 0 –60 –30 0 30 60 90 120 after CRH and responses were identical in both Time (min) groups (from baseline to peak value at 60 min- CRH (2 µg/kg iv) utes, controls: 13.6 (1.2) mg/dl to 28.9 (1.3) Figure 3 Changes in motility indexes of the descending colon induced by CRH. *p<0.05 mg/dl; IBS patients: 13.6 (1.6) mg/dl to 30.2 versus controls by Mann-Whitney U test. (1.8) mg/dl; p<0.001). 848 Fukudo, Nomura, Hongo

Discussion transmission is probably mediated through the This is the first study confirming that exog- sacral parasympathetic pathways.8 Replicating enous CRH can produce considerable changes previous reports,34 there is no significant

in phasic contractions in human colon and diVerence in basal colonic motility between Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.42.6.845 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from . CRH is a peptide containing 41 IBS patients and healthy control subjects in amino acids,21 distributed in the whole brain this study. In contrast, provocation tests such as with dense localisation in the paraventricular loading psychological stress or injection of nucleus of the ,22 and now neostigmine are reported to induce colonic considered to be a major mediator of the stress dysmotility in IBS patients.34 These observa- response.10 Stress releases CRH from the tions and our current data suggest that the paraventricular nucleus and CRH stimulates colon of IBS patients is hypersensitive to pituitary ACTH secretion.23 Growing evidence acetylcholine and CRH which are presumably from animal experiments indicates that endog- released by stress. Duodenal contraction was enous CRH plays a role in mediating stress also induced by intravenous CRH in humans induced alteration of gastrointestinal motor for a short duration. A significantly greater function.6–9 Intracerebroventricular adminis- incidence of phase III within 15 minutes after tration of CRH mimics the eVects of various CRH injection than that within 15 minutes of stressors in inhibiting small intestinal transit the start of baseline suggested that this is not and stimulating colonic motor function incidental. Exogenous CRH induces a faster through autonomic pathways in rats.6–9 Stress rhythm of the MMC period in the proximal induced alterations in gastrointestinal motility in dogs28 and increases post-prandial in animals are abolished by intracerebroven- motor activities in humans,29 suggesting its tricular administration of the CRH antagonist, stimulatory action on motility of the small 6–9 á helical CRH9–41. Our data provide strong intestine in certain species. Prolonged ambula- support for the hypothesis of a role of CRH in tory recording of duodenal motility showed alterations of human gastrointestinal motility. that most IBS patients show increased inci- The precise site of action of intravenous dence of clustered contractions under alert CRH on human gastrointestinal motility is conditions.18 In our study, administration of unknown. Because intravenous administration CRH in IBS patients induced duodenal of ACTH or â endorphin does not mimic CRH dysmotility with abdominal pain. These obser- eVects on gut motility,5 increased plasma vations suggest that not only the colon but also ACTH is not likely be involved in intestinal the small intestine is sensitive to the centrally responses to CRH. There are three forms of derived stimuli in IBS patients. 24 CRH receptors: CRH1, CRH2á, and CRH2â. We found an increased ACTH response to

The mRNA for CRH1 and CRH2á is predomi- CRH in IBS patients. Psychosocial stress

nantly expressed in the brain, whereas the induces onset and/or exaggeration of gastroin- http://gut.bmj.com/

mRNA for CRH2â is expressed in both the testinal symptoms in the majority of IBS brain and the periphery.24 There are functional patients.2–4 The responses of the hypothalamo- CRH receptors in the smooth muscle of the pituitary-adrenal axis during chronic stress in colon but the precise subtype of the receptors is rats are characterised by increased hypotha- unknown.25 As there is a specific unidirectional lamic CRH mRNA and immunoreactive CRH, brain to blood transport system for CRH,26 decreased pituitary CRH receptors, higher non-specific penetration of intravenous CRH pituitary content of ACTH, normal or slightly into the brain is unlikely to occur.23 A more elevated plasma ACTH, and hypersecretion of on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. plausible possibility is that intravenous CRH the ACTH responses to a novel stress.30 31 aVects gut motility through brain CRH recep- Another study showed that pretreatment with tors at circumventricular organs that are short inescapable stress induced exaggerated relatively unprotected by the blood-brain ACTH secretion to a novel stress, whereas cor- barrier.27 This hypothesis is supported by the tisol secretion did not diVer between previously report that CRH given intracerebroventricu- stressed and control rats.32 These results from larly and intravenously was essentially equipo- stressed animals resemble our human data. tent in modulating intestinal motility.9 In vitro Stress experience may account for a sensitised eVects of CRH on contractions of colonic ACTH response in the pituitary gland and a smooth muscle cells are not excitatory but desensitised adrenocortex of IBS patients. 25 inhibitory. In contrast, in vivo eVects of Furthermore, á2 adrenergic antagonists poten- intracerebroventricular CRH on colonic motil- tiate exogenous CRH induced ACTH secre- ity is always excitatory.5–9 Therefore, altered tion in rats.33 A blunted gastrointestinal motility in our results is response to desipramine in IBS patients, which

probably not mediated by peripheral receptors, suggests impaired á2 adrenergic function, was but by central CRH receptors in the circum- also reported.34 Therefore, exogenous CRH ventricular organs. Administration of a specific induced ACTH hypersecretion in IBS patients

antagonist would determine the precise sites may be due to á2 blockade in the brain. It is also and eVects of intravenous CRH on gut motility. possible that decreased levels of CRH binding Colonic motor function, of the descending protein, which inhibits the ACTH releasing colon in particular, was stimulated by CRH in properties of CRH, may play a role in ACTH our study. This finding is compatible with the hypersecretion in IBS patients.35 This results of animal experiments.7–9 The mech- possibility should be explored in the future. anism by which intracerebroventricular CRH Anxiety and depression are common psycho- influences colonic motility involves peripheral logical features in IBS patients.2 Intracerebro- 68 cholinergic neurotransmission. This neuro- ventricular administration of CRH or an á2 EVects of CRH on gastrointestinal motility in IBS 849

antagonist induces noradrenaline release in the 12 Thompson WG, Creed F, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disease and functional abdominal pain. Gastroenterol locus caeruleus with concomitant production of Int 1992;5:75–91. anxiogenic behaviour in rats.22 Patients with 13 Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Nyren O, et al. Irritable bowel syn- drome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap depression have CRH hypersecretion in the and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology 1995;109: Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.42.6.845 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from brain, especially the paraventricular nucleus.36 671–80. 14 Lemann M, Flourie B, Picon L, et al. Motor activity Neuronal circuits relay visceral information to recorded in the unprepared colon of healthy humans. Gut these nuclei. Distension of the distal colon 1995;37:649–53. 37 15 Suda T, Tomori N, Yajima F, et al. Immunoreactive increases the firing rate of the locus caeruleus. corticotropin-releasing factor in human plasma. J Clin As the majority of IBS patients have a decreased Invest 1985;76:2026–9. 38 16 Hermus ARMM, Pieters GFFM, Willemsen JJ, et al. Hypo- visceral threshold to colonic distension, in- tensive eVects of ovine and human corticotrophin-releasing creased visceral information to the locus caeru- factors in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1987;31:531–4. leus may cause more activation of CRH 17 Bazzocchi G, Ellis J, Villanueva-Meyer J, et al. Postprandial 39 colonic transit and motor activity in chronic constipation. neurones in the paraventricular nucleus. Gastroenterology 1990;98:686–93. Exogenous CRH decreases the visceral thresh- 18 Kellow JE, Gill RC, Wingate DL. Prolonged ambulant 40 recordings of small bowel motility demonstrate abnormal- old to rectal distension in humans and this ity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology mechanism probably relates to CRH induced 1990;98:1208–18. 19 Kellow JE, Phillips SF. Altered small bowel motility in irri- abdominal symptoms in IBS patients as well as table bowel syndrome is correlated with symptoms. Gastro- motility change. Furthermore, intravenous ad- enterology 1987;92:1885–93. 20 Stanghellini V, Camilleri M, Malagelada J-R. Chronic ministration of CRH decreases slow wave sleep idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: clinical and intes- in humans11 and the proportion of rapid eye tinal manometric findings. Gut 1987;28:5–12. 21 Vale W, Spiess J, Rivier C, et al. Characterization of a movement (REM) sleep is notably increased in 41-residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates IBS patients.41 We previously reported the stress secretion of corticotropin and â endorphin. Science 1981;213:1394–7. induced increase in electroencephalographic 22 Petrusz P, Merchenthaler I. The corticotropin-releasing fac- beta power in IBS patients.4 These findings tor system. In: NemeroV CB, ed. Neuroendocrinology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1992:129–83. support our hypothesis that CRH is increased 23 Owens MJ, NemeroV CB. Physiology and pharmacology of in the brain of IBS patients. corticotropin-releasing factor. Pharmacol Rev 1991;43: 425–73. In conclusion, intravenous administration of 24 Lovenberg TW, Chalmers DT, Liu C, et al. CFR2á and CRH partially mimicked the stress response of CRF2â receptor mRNAs are diVerentially distributed between the central nervous system and peripheral tis- the gastrointestinal motility and neuroendo- sues. Life Sci 1997;60:857–64. crine response in humans. These responses 25 Iwakiri Y, Chijiiwa Y, Motomura Y, et al. Presence of func- tional receptors for corticotropin-releasing hormone in were exaggerated in IBS patients. Our present caecal circular smooth muscle cells of guinea pig. Life Sci study suggests that CRH plays an important 1997;60:857–64. 26 Martins JM, Kastin AJ, Banks WA. Unidirectional specific role in modulating brain-gut functions under and modulated brain to blood transport of corticotropin- stress in humans, and that this releasing hormone. Neuroendocrinology 1996;63:338–48. 27 Perrin MH, Donaldson CJ, Chen R, et al. Cloning and func- relates to the pathophysiology of IBS. tional expression of a rat brain corticotropin-releasing fac-

tor (CRF) receptor. Endocrinology 1993;133:3058–61. http://gut.bmj.com/ Part of this work has been presented at the 95th annual meeting 28 Bueno L, Fargeas MJ, Gue M, et al.EVects of corticotropin- of the American Gastroenterological Association, 1994, New releasing factor on plasma motilin and levels Orleans, Louisiana, USA (Gastroenterology 1994;106:A501). and gastrointestinal motility in dogs. Gastroenterology 1986; This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific 91:884–9. Research No. 2–603–6263–06770047 and No. 2–603–6231– 29 Mayer EA, Sytnik B, Reddy SN, et al. Corticotropin- 05770042 from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture releasing factor (CRF) increases post-prandial duodenal of Japan. The authors thank the following doctors for their motor activity in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1992;4: comments and technical support: M Satake, M Kanazawa, T 53–60. Sugawara, Y Endo, T Shoji, K Karahashi, T Imai, Y Tanno, and 30 Tizabi Y, Aguilera G. Desensitization of the hypothalamic- A Utsumi. pituitary-adrenal axis following prolonged administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone or . Neu- on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 1 Malagelada J-R. The gastroduodenal response to stress in roendocrinology 1992;56:611–18. man in health and functional dyspepsia. In: Tache Y, Win- 31 Young EA, Akil H. Corticotropin-releasing factor stimula- gate D, eds. Brain-gut interactions. Boca Raton, Florida: tion of adrenocorticotropin and â-endorphin release: CRC Press, 1991:297–305. eVects of acute and chronic stress. Endocrinology 1985;117: 2 Drossman DA, Richter JE, Talley NJ, et al. The functional gas- 23–30. trointestinal disorders. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1994. 32 van Dijken, de Goeji DCE, Sutanto W, et al. Short inescap- 3 Fukudo S, Suzuki J. Colonic motility, autonomic function, able stress produces long-lasting changes in the brain- and gastrointestinal under psychological stress pituitary-adrenal axis of adult male rats. Neuroendocrinology on irritable bowel syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 1987;151: 1993;58:57–64. 373–85. 33 Kovacs K, Makara GB. Factors from the paraventricular 4 Fukudo S, Nomura T, Muranaka M, et al. Brain-gut nucleus mediate inhibitory eVect of alpha-2-adrenergic response to stress and cholinergic stimulation in irritable drugs on ACTH secretion. Neuroendocrinology 1993;57: bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;16:133–41. 346–50. 5 Williams CL, Villar RG, Peterson JM, et al. Stress-induced 34 Dinan TG, Barry S, Ahkion S, et al. Assessment of central changes in intestinal transit in the rat: a model for irritable noradrenergic functioning in irritable bowel syndrome bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1988;94:611–21. using a neuroendocrine challenge test. J Psychosom Res 6 Lenz HJ, Raedler A, Greten H, et al. Stress-induced 1990;34:575–80. gastrointestinal secretory and motor responses in rats are 35 Behan DP, De Souza EB, Lowry PJ, et al. Corticotropin- mediated by endogenous cortocotropin-releasing factor. releasing factor (CRF) binding protein: a novel regulator of Gastroenterology 1988;95:1510–17. CRF and related . Front Neuroendocrinol 1995;16: 7 Gue M, Junien JL, Bueno L. Conditioned emotional 362–82. response in rats enhances colonic motility through the cen- 36 NemeroV CB. New vistas in neuropeptide research in tral release of corticotropin-releasing factor. Gastroenterol- neuropsychiatry: focus on corticotropin-releasing factor. ogy 1991;100:964–70. Neuropsychopharmacology 1992;6:69–75. 8 Monnikes H, Schmidt BG, Tache Y. Psychological stress- 37 Elam M, Thoren P, Srensson TH. Locus ceruleus neurons induced accelerated colonic transit in rats involves and sympathetic nerves: activation by visceral aVerents. hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor. Gastroenterol- Brain Res 1986;375:117–25. ogy 1993;104:716–23. 38 Mayer EA Raybould HE. Role of visceral aVerent 9 Williams CL, Peterson JM, Villar RG, et al. Corticotropin- mechanisms in functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology releasing factor directly mediates colonic responses to 1990;99:1688–704. stress. Am J Physiol 1987;253:G582–6. 39 Tache Y, Monnikes H, Bonaz B, et al. Role of CRF in stress- 10 Dunn AJ, Berridge CW. Physiological and behavioral related alterations of gastric and colonic motor function. responses to corticotropin-releasing factor administration: AnnNYAcadSci1993;697:233–43. is CRF a mediator of anxiety or stress responses? Brain Res 40 Lembo T, Plourde V, Shui Z, et al.EVects of the Rev 1990;15:71–100. corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) on rectal aVerent 11 Holsboer F, von Bardeleben U, Steiger A. EVects of nerves in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1996;8:9–18. intravenous corticotropin-releasing hormone upon sleep- 41 Kumar D, Thompson PD, Wingate DL, et al. Abnormal related growth hormone surge and sleep EEG in men. REM sleep in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol- Neuroendocrinology 1988;48:32–8. ogy 1992;103:12–17.