<<

61

FLINT AND . By WILLIAM HILL. F.G.S.

(Presidential Address, delivered February Srd, 19/1.)

CONTE:'l"TS. PAGE

I. !)lTRODUCTION. 61 2. T\'PES OF AND CHERT (CRHACEOUS) 64- 3. VARIETIES OF FLINT FROM FORMATIONS OTHER THAN THE CHALK 69 4. VARIETIES OF CHERT •••" 71 of the Upper and Lower Greensand. 71 Chert of the Portland Beds. 73 Carboniferous Chert • 76 Chalcedony in Flint . 80 Chert of the Culm Measures 82 5. IMMATURE FLINT AND CHERT 83 6, GENERAL SUMMARY 85 7 CLASSIFICATION OF SILICIOUS 93

1. INTRODUCTION. VE RYONE familiar with the Chalk of is E also familiar with the nodules of a different substance which are scattered through it. Break one, the fracture will be conchoidal, and it will be found that within a white rind of greater or less thickness is a hard, black, translucent material, possibly with some cloudy patches, which we recognise as flint. How and when the term flint became applied to these nodules in the Chalk is a matter of some obscurity. We know that Early Man recognised the value of flint for offensive, defensive and domestic purposes, and until quite recent years it played no unimportant part in the economies of mankind. The word probably came to us from the Saxon "flinta." It is used six times by the translators of the Authorised Version of the Old and New Testament, though it seems to be applied to rocks of exceptional hardness, and not to be confined to what we know as flint. Virgil, Pliny, and Lucretius use the word silex in connec­ tion with striking fire. According to Murray the word occurs in the Epinal Glossary about A.D. 700, page 8°5; it is there referred to as Petra-focaria, flint. In another Glossary, A.D. 1050, it is again described as Petra-focaria, "jryslan"· "jlyllte," and thenceforward the word occurs frequently in con­ nection with fire and fire-arms, and is certainly used to describe PROC. GEOL. Assoc., VOL. XXIl, PART 2, 19I1.] 6 62 WILLIAM HILL ON the material which occurs as nodules in the Chalk. So closely indeed is chalk and flint connected in our minds that it is hardly possible to think of one without recalling the other, and if a geologist were asked where were to be found he would almost certainly refer the enquirer to the Chalk, therefore we may safely take one of these silicious nodules as the type of true flint. They are, as we all know, segregations of silica, probably derived from organisms which lived in the sea, but the chemical processes which have involved the disappearance of the silica of sponge spicules, the tests of Radiolarians, or of the frustules of Diatoms from the chalky deposit, and its re-appear­ ance in the form of flint nodules, though not perhaps so great a mystery

2. TYPES OF FLINT AND CHERT (CRETACEOUS).

Bearing these remarks in mind, let us see for ourselves what differences there are between a typical example of flint and chert. As an example of flint I take a pure black translucent speci­ men from the zone of Micraster cor-anguinun; near Hitchin. I assume you must all know what flint is like, and that I need do no more than recapitulate its salient features when a thin slice of it is viewed under the microscope. It will be seen almost clear and colourless, or with a faint brownish tinge which Prof. Sollas t regards as " probably due to the carbonaceous pigment, the last residuum of the living protoplasm once present in the chalk." In this translucent medium the forms of

*' "The Formation of Chert and its tt.;icro-structure in some Jurassic Strata!' Proc; Geol, Assoc., vol. xviii (1203-4), p, 71. of "Age of the Earth, ' p. 142. FLINT AND CHEI~T. spheres, shell frngments, or other small calcareous organisms contained in the chalk may often be seen faintly but faithfully outlined, though details of their structure may be obscure. Sponge spicules are not abundant in such flint, though traces of them occur in most specimens. Viewed with a high power, say ~-in. objective, it will be seen that the flint has not the homo­ geneous appearance of quartz and glass, and one seems to realise, in a confusion of faint and shadowy lines, that the material is built up of minute particles fused or cemented together into a coherent mass. To those familiar with the minute structure of the chalk there would appear grounds for thinking that the flint was a pseudomorph of the original deposit, silica replacing the chalk particle by particle, a viP-IV supported by the remarks of Professor Rupert jones," Professor Judd t in his read before the Association on the" Unmaking of Flints," and also by Professor Sollas.] With crossed nicols the silica of the flint is seen to be in a minutely crypto-crystalline condition, the optical action of the light giving rise to a multitude of bluish specks, which, though separate, yet closely approximating to each other, give the whole a greyish-blue appearance. But this even structure is not alto­ gether unbroken, for at points which correspond with well-shown foraminifera, or with that occupied by a shell fragment or a sponge spicule, larger and more strongly refractive crystals map out, as it were, the area once occupied by the organism. The apparent separation of the minute crystals seems due to two facts; the first is that the axes of the crystals do not all lie in the same plane-some are presented to the eye at the extinction angle, and will appear and disappear as the stage is slowly rotated j secondly, that flint is an intimate admixture of opaline and crystalline silica, the opaline silica, which is negative to polarised light, filling minute interspaces between the silicious crystals.§ It is, however, rare to find a nodule consisting throughout of pure black flint; in almost everyone there are breaks in the homogeneity of the material, breaks which are usually referred to as "cloudy patches." Many flints, too, are greyish, others are bluish-grey, and are duller and less glassy than black flint; some have a peculiar opaline appearance, others may be entirely white. These modifications are largely due to the imperfect

* H On Quartz and Other Forms of Silica," T. Rupert Jones, Proc, Geol. A soc t \-01. iv ( 1874-6 1, p. 439· t Proc, Geol. Assoc.. vol. x (1887.8), p. 2I9. t H Age of the Earth," p. 150; and