Self-Justification in John Cassian's Ascetic Prefaces

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Self-Justification in John Cassian's Ascetic Prefaces GOODRICH/SELF-JUSTIFICATION IN CASSIAN 411 Underpinning the Text: Self-Justification in John Cassian’s Ascetic Prefaces RICHARD J. GOODRICH John Cassian has long been recognized as a master of ascetic theory. It is only in recent years, however, that his abilities as a Latin stylist have begun to be acknowledged. This paper examines how Cassian used the prefaces of his ascetic treatises to win a hearing for his version of the monastic life. His works were intended to influence a highly literate, aristocratic audience, and the strategies he employed to gain admission into this circle of readers offer a valuable insight into the methods of a late antique writer. Sometime around 419 c.e., John Cassian wrote the twelve books of his De institutis coenobiorum et de octo principalium vitiorum remediis (Institutes) for an audience of Gallic bishops and ascetics. This work and the one that followed, the tripartite Collationes patrum (Conferences), purported to contain the distillate of Cassian’s lengthy tutelage at the hands of the Egyptian desert fathers.1 To modern readers familiar with the impact that Cassian’s work had on Western monasticism, it may seem self-evident that Cassian’s light from the East (ex oriente lux) was worth I would like to thank the following individuals for their help and critiques: Gillian Clark, Jill Harries, Conrad Leyser, and the two anonymous reviewers for JECS. Needless to say, any shortcomings that remain in this article are to be attributed to my own obstinancy, rather than a failure of their generous counsel. 1. We lack adequate evidence for the length of Cassian’s stay among the Egyptian desert fathers. The consensus view is 15 years, based on references in Coll. (Columba Stewart, Cassian the Monk [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998], 8). Karl Suso Frank, “John Cassian on John Cassian,” SP 33 (1997): 431, argues for a much shorter stay while Marilyn Dunn, The Emergence of Monasticism: From the Desert Fathers to the Early Middle Ages (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 74, asserts that Cassian had virtually no contact with the Egyptian monks. Journal of Early Christian Studies 13:4, 411–436 © 2005 The Johns Hopkins University Press 412 JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES the attention of his Gallic audience.2 But would this have been the view of his first readers? What right did John Cassian have to prescribe practices for a group that had apparently been getting on well enough without his advice?3 Who gave this foreigner4 the right to delimit authentic asceti- cism, to be the arbiter of Gallic monastic practices? In fact, John Cassian, even with his wealth of experience, faced the same problem as any new writer, ancient or modern: he had to find an audience for his works. The monastic movement was well underway before John Cassian arrived in Gaul. Other authors, such as Sulpicius Severus, Rufinus, Jerome, and Paulinus of Nola, had already articulated versions of the ascetic life which were readily available in Gaul; local aristocrats such as Honoratus of Lérins were forming their own monas- teries. There was no shortage of ascetic advice available: in order to win a hearing for his works, John Cassian would have to justify first his right to write them. Nowhere is this theme of self-justification more evident than in the prefaces of each of his compositions. Cassian bent his formidable rhetori- cal abilities to winning a favorable hearing for his works. While Cassian has been rightly celebrated as a master of ascetic theory, his artistry as both literary stylist and sophisticated rhetorician has been largely over- looked.5 In part this may be due to a historiographical bias that prefers to see Cassian as a humble, self-effacing monk rather than as a sophisticated writer who shaped his texts to foster the illusion of humility and simplic- 2. On the significance of Eastern practices for Western monks, see F. Prinz, Frühes Mönchtum im Frankenreich (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1965), 94–101, 471. 3. For Cassian as just one of a number of sources available for fifth-century Gallic monks, see Philip Rousseau, “Cassian: Monastery and World,” in The Certainty of Doubt: Tributes to Peter Munz, ed. Miles Fairburn and W. H. Oliver (Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press, 1995), 70. 4. The question of Cassian’s birthplace remains open. Supporters of Cassian as a native of the Roman province of Scythia Minor include Owen Chadwick, John Cassian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950), 190–98; Pierre Courcelle, Late Latin Writers and Their Greek Sources (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969), 227 n. 5; Theodor Damian, “Some Critical Considerations and New Arguments Reviewing the Problem of St. John Cassian’s Birthplace,” Patristic and Byzantine Review 9 (1990): 149–70; and Stewart, Cassian, 6. A conflicting view sees Cassian as a native son of Roman Gaul, a position held by M. Cappuyn, “Cassien,” Dictionnaire d’histoire et de géographie ecclésiastiques 11 (1949): 1321; Frank, “John Cassian,” 422. 5. Albrecht Dihle, Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire: From Augustus to Justinian (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), 420, notes that Cassian was an “elegant stylist” but offers no evidence to substantiate this appraisal. GOODRICH/SELF-JUSTIFICATION IN CASSIAN 413 ity.6 We would do well to remember Gennadius’ assessment of Cassian’s merits as a writer: “he wrote, with experience as his teacher, in poised speech (and to speak more openly) choosing his words with sensitivity and enlivening his language with vigour, concerning the matters necessary to the profession of all monks.”7 Gennadius recognized both Cassian’s experience and the compositional care that shaped his presentation for a Gallic audience. Cassian’s golden artistry is the subject of this paper. Through an exami- nation of the prefaces to Cassian’s ascetic treatises, I shall demonstrate the rhetorical strategies he employed to win an audience for his works. As we shall see, his early prefaces dwell on the authorizing weight of the bishops who had commissioned them. The later prefaces differ markedly: here Cassian emphasizes how his works are spreading through the prov- ince of Narbonensis Secunda and how many exemplary ascetics have adopted and ordered their lives by Cassian’s precepts. Finally, I will compare the strategies Cassian employed in the prefaces of his ascetic treatises with those found in the theological polemic, On the Incarnation, a text directed toward an extra-Gallic, pan-Christian audience. As we shall see, in attempting to cultivate an audience, Cassian demonstrated that the humble monk was also a highly educated Roman writer. In addition to offering a shift in our appraisal of Cassian, this analysis will also serve to demonstrate the strategies a late antique Christian writer might employ in order to gain the attention and following of a local audience. INSTITUTES At the heart of each of Cassian’s prefaces is a fundamental, recurrent question: What authorizes him to compose this work? The answer he gives evolves as he gains a readership and is able to portray himself as a more confident writer. Our survey begins with the preface to the Insti- tutes. In the opening lines of his literary debut, we find a very straightfor- ward answer to the question of authority: I write because the great bishop 6. This view is slowly changing. See, for instance Rousseau, Cassian, passim; Conrad Leyser, “Lectio divina, oratio pura: Rhetoric and the Techniques of Asceti- cism in the Conferences of John Cassian,” in Modelli di santità e modelli di comportamento, ed. Giulia Barone et. al. (Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier, 1994), 79– 105. 7. Gennad. Vir. 62 (TU 14:82.10–13): Scripsit, experientia magistrante, librato sermone et, ut apertius dicam, sensu verba inveniens, et actione linguam movens, res omnium monachorum professioni necessarias. 414 JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES Castor has (despite my incredible deficiencies) ordered me to do so. Inextricably linked to this is the notion that since Castor has commanded the production of the work, and Cassian is only obeying his instruction, Castor bears responsibility for what is produced. These four themes—the magnificence of the patron, the patron’s demand for the work, the unwor- thiness of the author, and the patron’s final responsibility for the work— are woven throughout this preface. Indeed, the first three themes feature prominently in the encomium that introduces the Institutes: The history of the Old Testament tells how the most wise Solomon, after having received from heaven wisdom and prudence beyond measure and a breadth of heart as uncountable as the grains of sand at the seashore—so that, by the testimony of the Lord it is said that no one similar to him had ever existed in the past or will arise after him—wanting to erect a magnificent temple to the Lord, asked for help from the foreigner, the king of Tyre. This king sent Hyram, the son of a widow, to Solomon. Whatever magnificent thing the divine wisdom suggested to Hyram, either for the Temple or the sacred vases, he undertook and it was completed through his work and direction. And so if that ruler, so much higher than all of the kingdoms of the earth, that nobler and more excellent offspring of the Israelite people, that wisdom inspired by God which surpassed the knowledge and institutes of all the Easterners and Egyptians, did not disdain the counsel of a poor and foreign man, quite rightly do you, taught by these examples, most blessed Pope Castor . judge it appropriate to summon me, an indigent man and in every way a pauper, to a share in such a great work. Veteris instrumenti narrat historia sapientissimum Salomonem post acceptam diuinitus sapientiam prudentiamque multam nimis et latitudinem cordis quasi harenam maris innumerabilem, ita ut Domini testimonio nullus ei similis retro actis temporibus exstitisse, neque post eum surrecturus esse dicatur, illud magnificum Domino templum exstruere cupientem, alienigenae regis Tyri auxilium poposcisse.
Recommended publications
  • The Hermeneutics of John Cassian in Conference 14
    Logos: A Journal of Eastern Christian Studies Vol. 59 (2018) Nos. 1–4, pp. 263–275 The Monastic Life as Exegesis: The Hermeneutics of John Cassian in Conference 14 Thomas Deutsch Today, faith in the revelation of scripture is not a prerequi- site for becoming a successful scripture scholar. Although many contemporary scholars consider unbelief a prerequisite for analyzing and interpreting scriptures unbiasedly,1 the monk John Cassian (d. circa 435 C.E.) would see such lack of faith as detrimental to the entire process of understanding the scrip- tures. This divergence of opinion results in part because these contemporary scholars and Cassian view the end of scriptural interpretation differently. While a contemporary agnostic scholar strives in his or her exegetical work primarily for eru- dition, originality, and positive peer reception, Cassian wants to unlock the meaning of scriptures for the sake of living a life of unceasing prayer and encounter with God. 1 D.Z. Phillips describes the hermeneutical situation today in terms of a false dichotomy between a hermeneutics of recollection, which presupposes belief on the part of the interpreter in the religious texts being analyzed, and a her- meneutics of suspicion, which sees the unbelief of the interpreter as his or her greatest tool for accessing the meaning of the religious text, since the re- ligious worldview of the text hides or warps the truth of the text. As a middle position between these two extremes, Phillips offers the hermeneutic of con- templation, which allows the interpreter to accept the religious worldview of sacred texts for the purpose of interpretation without actually believing in the worldview presupposed by the text.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Tim W. Watson June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele R. Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Harold A. Drake Dr. Thomas N. Sizgorich Copyright by Tim W. Watson 2010 The Dissertation of Tim W. Watson is approved: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In accordance with that filial piety so central to the epistolary persona of Q. Aurelius Symmachus, I would like to thank first and foremost my parents, Lee and Virginia Watson, without whom there would be quite literally nothing, followed closely by my grandmother, Virginia Galbraith, whose support both emotionally and financially has been invaluable. Within the academy, my greatest debt is naturally to my advisor, Michele Salzman, a doctissima patrona of infinite patience and firm guidance, to whom I came with the mind of a child and departed with the intellect of an adult. Hal Drake I owe for his kind words, his critical eye, and his welcome humor. In Tom Sizgorich I found a friend and colleague whose friendship did not diminish even after he assumed his additional role as mentor. Outside the field, I owe a special debt to Dale Kent, who ushered me through my beginning quarter of graduate school with great encouragement and first stirred my fascination with patronage. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to the two organizations who have funded the years of my study, the Department of History at the University of California, Riverside and the Department of Classics at the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • Taught by God: Teaching and Spiritual Formation by Karen-Marie Yust and E
    For published version: See Interpreation 61 (3): 350. Taught by God: Teaching and Spiritual Formation by Karen-Marie Yust and E. Byron Anderson, Chalice Press, St. Louis, 2006. Pp. 186. $21.99. ISBN 0827236492. Religious educators need a vibrant spiritual life. This seems obvious but it is easy to overlook. When we think about education, we immediately think about our own schooling where we were required to regurgitate information. We do not think about deeper dimensions of formation and what this demands of the teacher. But “can we teach Christians to pray,” authors Karen-Marie Yust and E. Byron Anderson stress again and again, “if we ourselves do not know a life of prayer?” (p. 19). Taught by God is designed to address this oversight. It retrieves a rich variety of paths to Christian wisdom. In fact, a more accurate subtitle is “Spiritual Resources for Religious Educators.” Organized around a four-part exploration of teacher identity, teaching context, models, and evaluation, the book essentially reviews a series of classical texts (Luther, Kierkegaard, Julian of Norwich, John Cassian, Jane de Chantal, Francis de Sales, Anthony, John Bunyan, John Climacus, Thomas à Kempis, Benedict, Catherine of Siena, Diadochos, Ignatius, Henri Nouwen, and Simon Weil) as well as contemporary educational theorists, such as Parker Palmer and Mary Belenky. The summaries of primary texts and secondary source commentary on them makes for dry reading, a problem “easily rectified,” Yust and Anderson say, “through further reading” of the classics (p. 5). Reading this book alongside sample works would enhance its value. Unfortunately the advice of many of these figures stands at real odds with the lives of the book’s likely readers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology of Monastic and Aristocratic Community in Late Román Gaul
    roUS. Revista de ideas y formas políticas de la Antigüedad Clásica 6, 1994, pp. 203-220. THE IDEOLOGY OF MONASTIC AND ARISTOCRATIC COMMUNITY IN LATE ROMÁN GAUL Ralph W. Mathisen University of South Carolina The fifth century was a time of great change in the Mediterranean world. The classical, pagan world was being replaced by a new Christian one. And, in the west, there was a new barbarían presence to be dealt with as well. The élite classes around the empire dealt with these changes in different ways. In Gaul, aristocratic society carne under siege during the fifth century. The barbarían settlement in particular caused a crísis for Gallic aristocrats. The barbaríans competed with Gauls for social status, economic influence, and political office. Another problem for the Gauls was that there just were not very many of them. They were scattered far and wide, each focused on his own local interests. If Gallic aristocrats were to survive as a class, they were going to 203 have to devise ways to maintain aristocratic solidarity'. This study will argüe that, unlike other áreas of the empire, where aristocrats often contributed to their own decline by their competition with each other, Gallic aristocrats made common cause^. Few in number they may have been, but they compensated by finding novel means of creating unity from diversity and a new sense of aristocratic community. The Christian church played a significant part in the way that Gallo-Roman aristocrats redefined their roles. One does not normally think of Christianity as advocating an elitist ideal during this period, but the Gauls managed to find aspects of Christian beliefs and practices that were consistent with their own ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • ―Go, Sell Your Possessions, and Give to the Poor . . . , Follow Me‖: the Significance of the Ideal of Radical Poverty in John Cassian (Ca
    ―Go, Sell Your Possessions, and Give to the Poor . , Follow Me‖: The Significance of the Ideal of Radical Poverty in John Cassian (ca. 360–ca. 435) by Hyun Kee Na A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emmanuel College and the Historical Department of the Toronto School of Theology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael‘s College © Copyright by Hyun Kee Na 2016 ―Go, Sell Your Possessions, and Give to the Poor . , Follow Me‖: The Significance of the Ideal of Radical Poverty in John Cassian (ca. 360–ca. 435) Hyun Kee Na Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of St. Michael‘s College 2016 Abstract De institutis and Collationes patrum were written by John Cassian in early fifth- century Gaul. They are traditionally regarded as the documents which introduced the Eastern monastic tradition to the West. The theme of radical poverty is repeated throughout his writings in an intentional way. However, scholarship has paid little attention to this and what it means in Cassian‘s spiritual theology. In this dissertation, I first locate Cassian within the early fifth-century Gallic monastic context. I argue that Cassian‘s emphasis on literal poverty is based on his observation and diagnosis of Gallic monastic practices. Next, I analyze poverty in the writings associated with Antony, Pachomius, and Evagrius who are Cassian‘s major influences. In spite of their differences, they arrive at a similar idea about poverty: radical poverty helps remove avarice and the removal of avarice is necessary for inner purification.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassian on Sinlessness
    L CISTERCIAN Vl EDITOR'S NOTE ~ STUART SQUIRES C Cassian on Sinlessness o ~ ANNA HARRISON II Jesus Wept ": Mourning as Imitation of Christ fl\ in Bernard's Sermon Twenty Six on the Song of Songs Vl WOLFGANG Bucmsuller Introduction to Guerric of Igny: Christ as the Form of Life ~ GLENN E. MYERS :> Manuscript Evidence for the Golden Epistle's Influence on the Sermons of Johannes Tauler ~ PHILIP F. 0' MARA The 2013 Cistercian Studies Conference fl\ ;; ~ BOOK REVIEWS " ANNUAL INDEX ~ VOL. 48. 4 2013 .- l CISTERCIAN STUDIES ~UARTERLY DIRECTORS Abbot Elias Dietz, ocso Sr. Kathleen O'Neill, ocso Dr. Daniel M. La Corte EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR Fr. Mark A. Scott, ocso Dr. Marsha L. Dutton Gethsemani Abbey 360 Ellis Hall 3642 Monks Road Ohio University Trappist, KY 40051 Athens, OH 45701 [email protected] [email protected] SUBSCRIPTIONS BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Br. Brian Rooney, ocso Br. Paul Andrew Tanner, ocso Saint Joseph's Abbey New Melleray Abbey 167 N. Spencer Rd 6632 Melleray Circle Spencer, MA 01562-1233 Peosta, lA 52068-9736 subscriptions@cistercian-studies-quar- [email protected] terly.org Phone: 508-885-8700 ex 561 Fax: 508-885-8701 BOARD OF ADVISORS Dom John E. Bamberger Dom Thomas Davis Dom Bernard Johnson Dr. David N. Bell Dr. Michael Downey Dr. Brian Patrick McGuire Sr. Eleanor Campion Sr. Edith Scholl Fr. Michael Casey Dr. Elizabeth Freeman Dr. John R. Sommerfeldt Dr.LawrenceS.Cunningham Br. Patrick Hart The Rev. Dr. Tim Vivian © Copyright by Cistercian Studies Quarterly, Inc. 2013 Cistercian Studies Quarterly (ISSN 1062-6549) is published quarterly in February, May, Au- gust, and November by the Order of Cistercians of the Strict Observance, US Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Anderson, Colt
    Dr. C. Colt Anderson Field Historical Theology/Spirituality Educational History Ph.D. Marquette University, Religious Studies (1998) M.A. University of Georgia, Religious Studies (1991) B.A. University of Georgia, Philosophy (1989) Dissertation Bonaventure’s Collationes in Hexäemeron and the Joachite Controversy. Director: Dr. Wanda Zemler-Cizewski. Defended: April 28, 1998. Teaching Competencies Historical Theology/Church History: John Cassian, Byzantine Church History, Medieval Church History, Medieval Historical Theology, Preaching in the Middle Ages, Mysticism in the Middle Ages, Gregory the Great, Medieval Augustinianism, Medieval Christology, Francis and Clare of Assisi, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, Reformation Church History, Luther, Women Mystics in the Middle Ages, and History of Spirituality. Systematic Theology/Spirituality Carmelite Spirituality, Dominican Spirituality, Franciscan Spirituality, Ignatian Spirituality, Introduction to Religious Studies, Introduction to Theology, Introduction to Western Religious Thought, Ecumenism, Ecclesiology, Introduction to Spirituality, Monastic Spirituality, Prayer, Spirituality East and West, The Spirituality of Reform, and Trinity. Biblical Studies Introduction to the New Testament, New Testament Method, and The History of Christian Exegesis. CV/Anderson, 2 Professional Experience 2017-Present Full Professor of Christian Spirituality, Graduate School of Religion and Religious Education, Fordham University. My responsibilities include teaching systematic theology and spirituality in MAPS,
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaventure and the Sin of the Church
    Theological Studies 63 (2002) BONAVENTURE AND THE SIN OF THE CHURCH C. COLT ANDERSON [The author describes how the medieval tradition answered the question of whether one can legitimately speak of collective ecclesial sin. Using principally Bonaventure as a focal point, he examines how the notion of ecclesial sin functioned simultaneously as reform rhetoric and an ecclesial apologetic of humility. Finally, he applies Bonaventure’s analysis of ecclesial sin to the present crisis regarding sexual abuse of minors to show how this idea can function even today to exhort believers to maintain unity as they struggle for re- form.] VER SINCE THE Second Vatican Council declared that the Church is “at E once holy and always in need of purification,” there has been an ongoing debate over whether one may speak of the Church sinning as a collective body.1 Interest in this question has been stimulated by John Paul II’s repeated calls for the Church to repent for the many abusive policies and actions its members have engaged in over the last two millennia.2 More C. COLT ANDERSON is assistant professor in the department of church history at the University of St. Mary of the Lake/Mundelein Seminary in the archdiocese of Chicago. He received his Ph. D. from Marquette University. A specialist in the rhetoric and methods employed by the medieval reformers, he has also published a book entitled A Call to Piety: St. Bonaventure’s Collations on the Six Days (Fran- ciscan, 2002). 1 Lumen gentium no. 8, in Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
    Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler 2018 Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This dissertation, ‘Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages’, investigates changing perceptions of perjury and false witness in the late antique and early medieval world. Focusing on primary sources from the Latin-speaking, western Roman empire and former empire, approximately between the late third and seventh centuries CE, this thesis proposes that perjury and false witness were transformed into criminal behaviours, grave sins, and canonical offences in Latin legal and religious writings of the period. Chapter 1, ‘Introduction: The Problem of Perjury’s Criminalization’, calls attention to anomalies in the history and historiography of the oath. Although the oath has been well studied, oath violations have not; moreover, important sources for medieval culture – Roman law and the Christian New Testament – were largely silent on the subject of perjury. For classicists in particular, perjury was not a crime, while oath violations remained largely peripheral to early Christian ethical discussions. Chapter 2, ‘Criminalization: Perjury and False Witness in Late Roman Law’, begins to explain how this situation changed by documenting early possible instances of penalization for perjury. Diverse sources such as Christian martyr acts, provincial law manuals, and select imperial ii and post-imperial legislation suggest that numerous cases of perjury were criminalized in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • In John Cassian Steven David Driver
    The Reading of Egyptian Monastic Culture in John Cassian Steven David Driver A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of PhiLosophy, Graduate Department of the Centre for Yedieval Studies, in the University of Toronto @ Copyright by Steven David Driver 1994 National Library Bibliothbque nationale (f 1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 OttawaON K1AON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde me licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliotheque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, preter, bstribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/^ de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat electronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriete du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protege cette these. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent Stre imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Thesis Abstract The Reading of Egyptian Monastic Culture in John Cassian Doctor of Philosophy, 1995 Steven David Driver Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto This thesis considers the monastic teaching of John Cassian in its historical context. It argues that while he composed a series of discursive treatises, Cassian success- fully adapted an understanding of monastic reading drawn from the Origenist monks of Nitria, Kellia, and Scetis, and, more specifically, from Evagrius's sententiae, His dis- course was not based on abstract argument or even the particular application of general rules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hermeneutics of John Cassian in Conference 14
    Logos: A Journal of Eastern Christian Studies Vol. 59 (2018) Nos. 1–4, pp. 263–275 The Monastic Life as Exegesis: The Hermeneutics of John Cassian in Conference 14 Thomas Deutsch Today, faith in the revelation of scripture is not a prerequi- site for becoming a successful scripture scholar. Although many contemporary scholars consider unbelief a prerequisite for analyzing and interpreting scriptures unbiasedly,1 the monk John Cassian (d. circa 435 C.E.) would see such lack of faith as detrimental to the entire process of understanding the scrip- tures. This divergence of opinion results in part because these contemporary scholars and Cassian view the end of scriptural interpretation differently. While a contemporary agnostic scholar strives in his or her exegetical work primarily for eru- dition, originality, and positive peer reception, Cassian wants to unlock the meaning of scriptures for the sake of living a life of unceasing prayer and encounter with God. 1 D.Z. Phillips describes the hermeneutical situation today in terms of a false dichotomy between a hermeneutics of recollection, which presupposes belief on the part of the interpreter in the religious texts being analyzed, and a her- meneutics of suspicion, which sees the unbelief of the interpreter as his or her greatest tool for accessing the meaning of the religious text, since the re- ligious worldview of the text hides or warps the truth of the text. As a middle position between these two extremes, Phillips offers the hermeneutic of con- templation, which allows the interpreter to accept the religious worldview of sacred texts for the purpose of interpretation without actually believing in the worldview presupposed by the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint John Cassian-Cassian on the EIGHT PRINCIPAL VICES -Philokalia
    Saint John Cassian-Cassian The EIGHT PRINCIPAL VICES . COLLATIO QUINTA Quae est abbatis Serapionis. de OCTO PRINCIPALIBUS VITIIS . 1.Carnal & Spir.Vice. 2.Christ-Victory. 3.Char.Vices. 4.Domino-Effect. 5.Vicious Subtypes. 6.Discover Own Weakness. 7.Grace 8.Original Gluttony 9.Moderate Fasting. 10.Alt.Model: Pride as First. 1 CAPUT I. Adventus noster CHAPTER 1. Our arrival at Abbot Serapion’s ad abbatis Sarapionis cellam et inquisitio de cell, and inquiry on the different kinds of vices and generibus et inpugnatione the way to overcome them. vitiorum I. In illo coetu 1. IN that assembly of Ancients and antiquissimorum senum fuit uir nomine Sarapion, Elders was a man named Serapion, adprime gratia discretionis ornatus, cuius conlationem especially endowed with the grace of operae pretium reor litteris tradere. Ambientibus enim discretion, whose Conference I think it is nobis ut de inpugnatione uitiorum aliqua disputaret, worth while to set down in writing. For quibus origines eorum et when we entreated him to discourse of causae manifestius panderentur, ita exorsus the way to overcome our vices, so that est. their origin and cause might be made clearer to us, he thus began. CAPUT II. Narratio abbatis CHAPTER 2. Abba Serapion’s Discussion of [the ] Serapionis de octo principalibus vitiis. eight principal vices. II. Octo sunt principalia 1. THERE are eight principal vices uitia quae humanum infestant genus, id est which attack the human race; namely: primum gastrimargia, first gastrimargia , which means quod sonat uentris gluttony , ingluuies, secundum fornicatio, secondly fornication , tertium filargyria, id est auaritia siue amor thirdly philargyria , i.e., avarice or the pecuniae, quartum ira, love of money, quintum tristitia, sextum acedia, id est fourthly anger , anxietas seu taedium cordis, fifthly gloominess , septimum cenodoxia, id est iactantia seu uana sixthly acedia , i.e., listlessness or low gloria, spirits, octauum superbia.
    [Show full text]