Literary Skirmish Over Hiss
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
T SDA:Y;J Above photos he Assoateted Pre se: ROght photo from the dust Jacket or "Perim's,: The Hiss-Chambers Case" Then-Rep. Richard Nixon, above left. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, right. Far right, Allen Weinstein. Entertainment / People / The Arts APRIL 6, 1978 B1 A Literary Skirmish Over Hiss Attack and Counterattack, in a Battle Fought for 30 Years And so, Alistair Cooke's comment By Michael Kernan that the case put "a generation on trial" continues to reverberate. The Hiss-Chambers affair is 30 Years old and heading into its second Weinstein's book, five years in the generation — and people who were in writing, draws on a huge mass of new knee pants when it began still get material — 30,000 pages of FBI and fighting mad over It. Justice Department records, Inter- views with former Soviet spymasters The latest episode on Publishers and other figures — so overwhelming, Row is the lead article in the April 8 Weinstein says, that he himself Nation magazine, titled "The Case switched from his initial belief in Not Proved Against Alger Hiss, an In- Hiss' innocence. vestigation by Victor Navasky." It consists of an attack on Allen Wein- And now Navasky attacks the 40- stein's just-published book, which con- year-old Smith College historian with cludes that Hiss was "guilty as a series of statements by Weinstein charged" of perjury. interviewees denying some of the things that the book has them saying. And Weinsteln's book, "Perjury: The Hiss-Chambers Case," followed I sent Xeroxed galleys to the on the heels of another book, by John sources for some of Weinsteins most Chabot Smith. defending Hiss. Furi- spectacular research finds, people ous magazine pieces and reviews have who haven's been talked to before, swirled around New York, especially Navasky said, and I asked whether after Weinstein laid out some of his his use of their quotes reflected what findings In an article two years ago in The New York Review of Books. See HISS, B3, Col. 1 Attack and Counterattack in 11133, From B 1 they had told him. I put the nickel in "Weinstein's book, five years in the writing, draws —and hit the jackpot. But Weinstein says he stands by his research and welcomes inspection of on a huge mass of new material-30,000 pages of his documents. For those who came in late, the FBI and Justice Department records, interviews original ease went something like this Hiss was handsome and tall, a Har- with former Soviet spymasters and other figures— vard Law graduate and Phi Beta Kappa who glided easily through life so overwhelming, Weinstein says, that he himself as clerk for Justice Oliver Wendell Haines, State Department golden boy, presiding officer at the United Na- switched from his initial belief in Hiss' innocence." tions organizing conference, president of the Carnegie Endowment. Whit- taker Chambers, fat and rumpled, was a former Communist, later a senior To take one example out of 10 three years," he said, "and he was editor at Time. listed, here are the claims about friendly until last May. I have a dozen Maxim Lieber, identified in the book letters and a 36-page transcript of a On Aug. 3, 1048, Chambers testified as "Chambers' sometimes associate in taped interview." before the House Un-American Activi- the underground," who Weinstein said ties Committee that he had known He showed the quotations on the named one "J. Peter," or Joszef Pe- tape transcript: Lieber speaks of see- Hiss as a fellow Communist. A young ters, "as the head of the whole Com- member of the committee, Rep. Rich- ing Bykov and of seeing Bykov to- munist espionage apparatus in this gether with Peters. He describes Pe- ard Nixon, seized on the case in the country." face of a cool and effective denial by ters physically. Hiss of any knowledge of Chambers According to the book, Peters and "Was it through Chambers that you and his charges, ' Chambers set up the plan for the learned of (Peters') role as bead of the The ease wound its tortuous way American Feature Writers Syndicate, underground?" Weinstein asks on the through a peculiarly American an espionage cover. According to the tape. "Yes," repliets Lieber. landscape a prothonotary warbler, a book, Lieber said, "Some things are Weinstein: "Do you know that pas- pumpkin containing microfilm, a type- romanticized in 'Witness' but most of sage in 'Witness' where he kind of ap- writer who imprint allegedly was it, as I know of the incidents, is true." peals to you to come out and tell ev- gorged. And Lieber is quoted as confirming erything you know—you've read chambers' identification of Col. Boris 'Witness,' of course...." Denying everything steadfastly Bykov as his Russian spymaster. (though he finally had to acknowledge Lieber: "Weil, I've read it...." that he had known Chambers under Lieber, now ailing and elderly, Now listen to Maxim Lieber, speak- another name), Hiss was indicted for wrote to Navasky that Weinstein must ing yesterday from hN East Hartford perjury. His first trial ended in a have "made all these things up out of home: hung jury; his second, in 1950, sent whole cloth" and that he knew noth- "Weinstein came to see me under him to jail for 44 months. ing of the underground or of Peters false colors, representing himself as as its head He denied that the writers Now 73, Hiss still maintains his in- very friendly to Hiss. I never would nocence and has filed a petition to set group was an underground project. "I have said a single word to him if Fd aside the trial verdict Chambers died never read `Witnesi.' I do not remem- known he was friendly to Chambers, in 1061. His book, "Witness," came out ber meeting anyone named Bykov; I "I may have said things I wouldn't in 1952. never met any Russian with Cham- have said under different bers." The Navasky article mainly con- circumstances . I never read the cerns itself with Weinstein's scholar- Now talk to Weinstein—who Invites book 'Witness.' I was out of the coun- ' ship, his use of quotations, treatment Navasky. Hiss or anybody else to ex- try from 1950 to 19.1, and it was pub- of context and factual precision. A amine his thousands of documents, his lished in 1952. ." number of people who produced new tapps and notes, his original 1,600- He was in Mexico when the book, a information In the book told Navasky page manuscript Weinstein, whose attitude toward that they had been misrepresented. "Lieber and I corresponded for the case changed gradually during the a Literary Skirmish Over Hiss five years of research because, he said, of the accumulating challenges to Hiss' credibility, stands by his book. "I have tapes of several other inter- views that contradict Navasky's quotes, and I also have a mass of cor- roborative evidence and documents in support of any statements," he said. Several of the other people quoted by Navasky as being misrepresented had written Weinstein earlier, Wein- stein says—to repudiate him because he had changed his pisition in the case. ThiS summer he plans to write an essay responding to "legitimate criti- cism." The Navasky article was not unexpected, he said. Weinstein also foresees a hostile review by John Cha- bot Smith in a future Issue of Har- per's since Smith has been asking Smith College for information about Weinstein's finances and background. It was Smith's l976 book, "Alger Hiss: The True Story," that served as the framework for Weinstein's criti- que in The New York Review. Buckley's "Firing Line" invited Na- vasky several times to meet me in public, and he refused," Weinstein said. "I'll meet him any time. And if be feels he needs help, since he puts down everyone else as generalists, he can bring along all the experts he wants, Including Hiss." Navasky's reply: "The producers of 'Firing Line' called me when I was in the middle of writing my article and asked if I would debate the case, tak- ing the position taht Hiss was innocent, while Weinstein took the other side and a Baltimore newspaperman would moderate. Well, I haven't taken that kind of position at all. I don't know where come out about Hiss. I sug- gested sending someone who had re- ally specialized in the case to take that position—and I'd be happy to be the third party and ask the questions. "I'd be happy to be part of a discus- sion with Allen Weinstein on the question of his scholarship. Someone else should take up the matter of his thesis." So don't touch that dial not yet. Alger Hiss, 1975, by James A. Parceli—The Washington Post .