Recommended East Portland Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recommended East Portland Action Plan A guide for improving livability in outer East Portland Recommended December 2008 City Council Public Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 Time: 6:30 PM Location: Midland Library, 805 SE 122nd Avenue You may give City Council your comments on the East Portland Action Plan by: • Testifying at the City Council meeting on December 17, 2008, or • Sending your written comments to the Council Clerk at: 1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 140, Portland, Oregon, 97204; or e-mail to [email protected] or fax to 503-823-4571. Written testimony must be received by the date of the hearing. An electronic version of the report is posted on the project website: www.portlandonline.com/planning/epap. Hard copies are available at the following locations: • Bureau of Planning offices at 1900 SW 4th Avenue, 7th floor. (503-823-7700. You may also request to have a copy mailed to you.) • East Portland Neighborhood Office, 1017 NE 117th Avenue (503-823-4550) NOTE: Please call ahead for hours of operations for the Bureau of Planning and East Portland Neighborhood Office. The Bureau of Planning is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700 (TTY 503-823-6868). East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 Acknowledgements Action Plan Conveners East Portland Action Plan Committee Tom Potter - Mayor of the City of Portland Klondy Canales - Multnomah Youth Commission James Chasse - Southeast Resident, Powellhurst-Gilbert Neighborhood Board Ted Wheeler - Chair of Multnomah County Frieda Christopher - Southeast Resident, David Douglas School Board Board of Commissioners Michael Crebs - Portland Police Bureau Jeff Merkley - Speaker of the Oregon House Frank DiGregorio - Southeast Resident of Representatives Bob Earnest - Northeast Resident, Gateway Program Advisory Committee Karen Gray - Parkrose School District Rev. Brian Heron - Eastminster Presbyterian Church Judith Huck - Southeast Resident, Business Owner Jeff Jewel - Human Solutions Steve Kautz - TriMet Arlene Kimura - Northeast Resident, Hazelwood Neighborhood Board Lawrence Kotan - Northeast Resident Katie Larsell - Northeast Resident, Parkrose School Board Randy Leonard - Portland City Council Mary T. Li - Multnomah County School and Community Partnerships Robert Liberty - Metro Council James Pauley - Southeast Resident Vadim Riskin - Southeast Resident, Slavic Community Nick Sauvie - ROSE Community Development Corporation Jason Tell - Oregon Department of Transportation Jon Turino - Northeast Resident, Business Owner, Director APNBA Mike Vander Veen - Southeast Resident, Hazelwood Neighborhood Board Ted Wheeler - Multnomah County Commission Will White - City of Portland Bureau of Housing and Community Development Michelle Winningham - Southeast Resident Simon Wong - Business Owner, Asian Community Thanks also to Rey Espana - NAYA Cynthia Thomas - Metro.Family Service State Senator Rod Monroe Jean DeMaster - Human Solutions Carol Parten - Southeast Resident Dorene Warner - Human Solutions; NE Erik Sten - Portland City Council Resident East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 Portland Bureau of Planning Technical and Agency Advisors Gil Kelley - Director Richard Bixby - Portland Office of Neighborhood Involvement Joe Zehnder - Principal Planner Betty Dominguez - Housing Authority of Portland Deborah Stein - Supervising Planner Justin Douglas - Portland Development Commission Barry Manning - Project Manager Byron Estes - Portland Development Commission Joan Frederiksen - Portland Bureau of Development Services Cynthia Fuhrman - Portland Office of Sustainable Development Consultant Team Stuart Gwin - Portland Office of Transportation Deb Meihoff, AICP - Communitas LLC Brett Horner - Portland Bureau of Parks and Recreation Stefanie Slyman, AICP - Slyman Planning Resources LLC Beth Kaye - Portland Bureau of Housing and Community Development Dave Kliewer - Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Rick Larson - Centennial School District Technical Assistance Shelly Lomax - TriMet Li Alligood, Bureau of Planning Lisa Miles - Metro Regional Government Carmen Piekarski, Bureau of Planning Michael Parkhurst - City of Gresham Shelli Romero - Oregon Department of Transportation Barbara Rommel - David Douglas School District Photo Credits Mike Saling - Portland Water Bureau David F. Ashton, www.eastPDXnews.com Jim Schwager - Portland Fire and Rescue Deb Meihoff, Communitas LLC Casey Short - Portland Office of Management and Finance Zeke Smith - Portland School District Deborah Stein - Portland Bureau of Planning Andrea Watson - Reynolds School District Thanks also to Johnell Bell - Office of Multnomah County Chair Ted Wheeler Claire Griffin - Office of Oregon House Speaker Jeff Merkley Ty Kovatch - Office of Commissioner Leonard Steffeni Mendoza-Gray - Portland Office of Government Relations Sara Petrocine - Office of Commissioner Leonard Veronica Valenzuela - Office of Mayor Tom Potter Liesl Wendt - Office of Mayor Tom Potter East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 Contents Introduction 1 How to Use This Document 4 Background and Process 6 Summary of Project Origins Process Summary and Timeline Principles for Improved Livability 9 The Riches & Challenges of East Portland Principles East Portland Strategies and Actions 12 Anatomy of the Action Tables Abbreviation Glossary Action Tables Built 15 Environmental 25 Economic 31 Learning 34 Social 38 Steps for Implementation 48 Priorities Implementation Approach Future Assessment & Updates Appendix available separately East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 1 Introduction East Portland, with a population over 125,000 and growing, is composed of 13 neighborhoods and five business districts. The area represents almost one-quarter of the City of Portland’s population. Located primarily east of the I-205 freeway and west of the city of Gresham, East Portland includes some of the most recent areas to be annexed to the City. As a community, there are many attributes of which East Portland is proud: strong schools, family-friendly neighborhoods, cultural diversity and the beautiful natural environment. These assets are enhanced by the hard work of neighborhood associations, the faith community, local government and non-profit organizations working in the area. However, East Portland is transitioning from its once suburban and semi-rural form into an increasingly urban community – a fact that brings both benefits and challenges to the area. This change is heightening awareness of the area’s needs and issues. In particular, some of the fastest growing neighborhoods in the City are in East Portland. This rapid growth is straining existing infrastructure and community resources and services which have not kept up with demand. People are moving to the area in part because the large supply of existing and new housing is still affordable compared to many other Portland neighborhoods. However, the design and quality of new housing is sometimes inconsistent with the desired neighborhood character. The demographics of the population are also changing. Racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity has increased in recent years, offering exciting opportunities. At the same time, the range of cultures and languages presents challenges to building a sense of community. The area has quality schools and is attractive to families, but some school districts in the area are near capacity with the influx of children. Finally, a regional shift in the location of people in poverty creates new challenges as East Portland accommodates a larger number of economically disadvantaged households. East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 2 The East Portland Action Plan (“Action Plan”) is designed to identify gaps in policies, services and improvements in the area and identify opportunities to address these gaps while complementing existing efforts. The Action Plan is the result of eight months of diligent work by the East Portland Action Plan Committee (“Committee”). The Committee was established by the City of Portland and convened in December 2007 for the specific task of providing “leadership and guidance to public agencies and other entities on how to strategically address community-identified issues and allocate resources to improve livability for neighborhoods in the East Portland Neighborhood Office (EPNO) coalition area.” The result of the Committee’s work, the Action Plan, contains Strategies and Actions to provide guidance and direction to public agencies, non-profit organizations, businesses and individuals to address the broad array of opportunities and challenges facing East Portland. These Strategies and Actions are in support of the ultimate goal of the Action Plan, which is to improve the quality of life, help foster strong community connections, increase the area’s regional significance and improve equity for East Portland residents. East Portland Action Plan -- December 2008 3 East Portland EDemographicsAST PORTLAND DEMOGRAPHICS East Portland 1990 2000 2013* Population 103,012 123,302 141,345 % of Portland 21.2% 23.3% 24.4% Population Average 2.51 2.63 2.65 Household Size Median Household $27,207 $38,329 $62,722 Income % of Portland 105.4% 95.5% 97.2% Median Income % Population age 26.8% 28.2% 26.6% 19 or younger % Population age 14.6% 14.2% 13.6% 65 or older % White Alone 89.1% 78.1% 71.1% % Non-White 10.9% 21.9% 28.9% % Hispanic Origin 3.0% 8.5% 13.4% % Owner Occupied 58.2% 57.5% 57.7% Housing % Renter Occupied 37.5% 37.0% 35.1% Housing % Households 10.0% 11.1% n/a Below Poverty Source:
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Sauvie Island Quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington
    Geologic Map of the Sauvie Island Quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington By Russell C. Evarts, Jim E. O'Connor, and Charles M. Cannon Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3349 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evarts, R.C., O'Connor, J.E., and Cannon, C.M., 2016, Geologic map of the Sauvie Island quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3349, scale 1:24,000, pamphlet 34 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3349. ISSN 2329-132X (online) Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Gardens2016
    THE HARDY PLANT SOCIETY OF OREGON OPEN GARDENS2016 gardeners growing together Garden Thyme Nursery Harvest Nursery Hydrangeas Plus Nowlens Bridge Perennials Out in the Garden Nursery Sebright Gardens Secret Garden Growers Bailey garden 2016 Open Garden season is about to begin! Welcome to this year’s directory of approximately 100 listings covering a wide variety of wonderful gardens and nurseries to visit all season. Many gardens will be open on the weekends, and evening openings are on the second and fourth Mondays of June, July, August and September. The Directory has been prepared by a dedicated committee led by Chair Tom Barreto, assisted by Ruth Clark, Merle Dole-Reid, Jenn Ferrante, Barry Gates, Jim Rondone, Pam Skalicky, Lise Storc and Bruce Wakefield. Tom is also much appreciated for his beautiful photography which graces the cover this year. Special thanks to Linda Wisner for cover design, advice and production direction and a very big thank you to Bruce Wakefield for his help with a process that is always time consuming; we are very grateful. We have worked hard to assure the accuracy of the listings in the 2016 Open Gardens Directory, but if you find an error or omission, please contact the HPSO office at 503-224-5718. Corrections will be announced in the HPSO weekly email blasts. And most importantly, our deepest thanks to the generous and welcoming HPSO members who are sharing their gardens this year. We appreciate the opportunity to learn from, and enjoy, your remarkable gardens. 1 VISITOR GUIDELINES TO GOOD GARDEN ETIQUETTE We are fortunate to be able to visit so many glorious gardens through our HPSO membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Granite's Construction Experience
    PUGET SOUND REGION June 8, 2010 Jim Wilkerson Purchasing Division Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 S. 35th Street Tacoma, WA 98409 RE: Statement for Qualifications for Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project (Specification No: PW10-0128F) Dear Jim: The rehabilitation of the Murray Morgan Bridge offers the City of Tacoma yet another creative element to the City’s infrastructure that provides beneficial use to its citizens while honoring its past. Granite Construction Company (Granite), one of the largest and most established regional and national design-build construction contractors, offers the City of Tacoma a focused team of engineers and subconsultants that has the skills, experience, and local resources to partner with the City on the delivery of this truly unique project. The Granite Team was specifically structured to deliver the most cost-effective approach to reopening the Murray Morgan Bridge by November 2012. In doing so, we are confident that we are the team best suited to: Deliver on your schedule commitments Incorporate quality systems and materials Provide the highest value for the budget Reduce operating and maintenance costs Allow for maximum supplemental work Honor stakeholder commitments To achieve these objectives, Granite has carefully selected the following key team members: FIRM ROLE Granite Construction Company Submitter, Design-Build Contractor HDR Engineering, Inc. Lead Designer (Major Participant) Kleinfelder Quality Management, Materials Testing PRR Public Involvement CivilTech Engineering Retaining Walls & Lifesafety Structures Hough Beck & Baird Urban Streetscape Design & Sustainability Link Controls Electrical Controls Design-Builder Northwest Archaeological Associates Historic/Cultural Specialist Granite / Everett Area Office | 1525 E. Marine View Dr., Everett, WA 98201-1927 | Ph: (425) 551-3100 | Fax: (425) 551-3116 Granite / Whatcom Area Office | 3876 Hannegan Rd., Bellingham, WA 98226-9103 | Ph: (360) 676-2450 | Fax: (360) 733-6735 Granite / Thurston Area Office | 7717 New Market St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • Multnomah County Willamette River Bridges Capital Improvement Plan (2015-2034) FINAL
    Multnomah County Willamette River Bridges Capital Improvement Plan (2015-2034) FINAL Prepared for: Multnomah County Department of Community Services Bridge Division 1403 SE Water Ave. Portland, OR 97214 503 988-3757 www.multco.us/bridges Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Results .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Prioritization Process for Bridge CIP Projects .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bridge CIP Project Costs ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Bridge CIP Development Process Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Existing Information Review ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Steel Bridge News National Steel Bridge Alliance Significantly Reduced the Amount of Shoring Estero Project
    Steel Bridge NATIONAL STEEL BRIDGE ALLIANCE NEWS JUNE 2008 On Opposite Coasts BY CRAIG FINLEY, P.E., JERRY PFUNTNER, P.E., AND MATTHEW ADAMS, P.E. This rendering shows the MIC-MIA bridge, which will provide access to Miami International Airport’s rental car facility. Two Florida bridges—on either side of the state—will deliver multiple benefits to their owners and users, thanks to value The redesign of the Estero Parkway Flyover project replaces twin, cast-in- place concrete box girders with with a design using four steel box girders. engineering redesign. LOCATED ON OPPOSITE COASTS OF FLORIDA, TWO CUR- crete, of course. And despite what some may think, the savings aren’t RENT BRIDGE PROJECTS WILL SERVE VASTLY DIFFERENT strictly linked to the material costs of the former versus the latter. PURPOSES. Donald Deberry, P.E., public works operations manager for Lee The Estero Parkway Flyover, near Fort Myers on Florida’s west County, notes that the recent cost fluctuation for all kinds of con- coast, will ease traffic congestion on the parkway and offer travel- struction materials underscores the need for good, solid engineering ers an alternate east-west route on the Tamiami Trail and I-75. The design, because chasing material prices is a losing game. Miami Intermodal Center Terminal Access Roadway Project—nick- “It might look like you’re saving money when you evaluate price Lnamed MIC-MIA—will provide access to a rental car facility as part during development of the project or the bridge development re- of a major upgrade of Miami International Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • A Co-Taught Field Course with Integrated History and Civil Engineering Content
    Paper ID #21651 Bridging the Gap: a Co-taught Field Course with Integrated History and Civil Engineering Content Dr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He imple- ments classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of an instructional strategy that seeks to overcome issues of student conceptual understanding. Dr. Mark Henry Clark, Oregon Institute of Technology After receiving a B.S. in mechanical engineering at Rice University in 1984, Mark Henry Clark decided to pursue a career in the history of technology, earning a Ph.D. in the subject at the University of Delaware in 1992. Since 1996, he has been professor of history at the Oregon Institute of Technology. He has also been a visiting faculty member at the University of Aarhus and the Technical University of Denmark. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Bridging the Gap: A Co-Taught Field Course with Integrated History and Civil Engineering Content This paper describes an innovative approach to the integration of social science and engineering content within the context of a field-based course. The class, titled “Oregon Bridges,” combines instruction about both the history of the construction and maintenance of major bridges in Oregon and the fundamental engineering design principles of bridge building.
    [Show full text]
  • About East Portland Neighborhoods Vol
    EAST PORTLAND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEWS October 2009 News about East Portland Neighborhoods vol. 14 issue 4 Your NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS Argay pg.pg. pg. pg.5 pg.6 pg. Neighborhood Association 33 4 6 12 Centennial Community Association All about East Portland Glenfair Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association News … Hazelwood The East Portland in outer East Portland that events, graffiti cleanups, and tribution with positive, far- Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association make up the EPNO coalition tree plantings. reaching results. News (EPNAN) isn’t a news- (our alliance individual neigh- As you look through our The volunteers of the East Lents paper in the traditional sense. borhoods) – know more paper and see how your Portland Neighbors Inc. Neighborhood Association It wasn’t created to compete about this sanctioned system neighbors are making a real Newspaper Committee thank with community, city or of neighborhood organiza- difference in their neighbor- you for taking a few minutes Mill Park national news outlets – nei- tions, recognized by City gov- hood, perhaps you’ll be to discover more about what Neighborhood Association ther in content nor for adver- ernment. encouraged by their efforts. your neighbors are doing, tisers. So, the stories and photos Then, possibly you’ll decide and how you can help outer Parkrose Heights EPNAN is the way the East you see on the pages inside to take as little as one hour a East Portland be an even Association of Neighbors Portland Neighborhood are about volunteers and month to participate in your nicer place to live when we Organization (EPNO) reach- organizations that are work- neighborhood association work together.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended
    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Tribune Closer to Home
    Ducks primed for strong fi nish EDITION — SEE SPORTS, B1 Oregon leaving lone loss well behind GREATER PORTLAND PortlandT U E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 1 4 • T W IC E C H O S E N T H E N A T IO N ’S B E S T N O N D A IL Y P ATribune P E R • P O R T L A N D T R IB U N E .C O M • P U B L IS H E D T U E S D A Y A N D T HURSDAY Sites for Court new jobs wrestles face more with cap hurdles on liability Study says luring Legal fi ght swirls big employers around $12 million depends on local verdict in OHSU case By PETER W ONG land-use action The Tribune By JIM REDDEN The Oregon Supreme Court The Tribune will hear arguments Thurs- day, Nov. 6, on whether $3 mil- On paper, the Portland area lion in damages is “substan- has enough vacant industrial tial” enough for the family of land to meet employers’ a boy whose liver operation at needs for the next 20 years. Oregon Health & Science Uni- In reality, maybe not. More versity went awry in 2009. than half the available sites need A jury in Multnomah County government help to develop, in- Circuit Court returned a $12 mil- cluding assembling adjacent BIG DREAMS, lion verdict last year against lots, annexations into cities, in- OHSU and surgeon Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Within Your Reach a Publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council
    Winter 2011 Volume XIX, No. 1 Within Your Reach A publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council reach: a) a portion of a stream or river b) an extent, esp. of knowledge or comprehension Invasives, Trash and Donuts By JoAnn Herrigel, Community Services Director, City of Milwaukie I have attended the Johnson Creek Water- shed Council’s Watershed Wide Event (WWE) for almost ten years in a row. When I began attending this event, my daughter was 3 years old and she and I spent most of our time eat- ing donuts and wandering about talking to people. Thankfully, the donuts were plentiful (and yummy) and there were lots of fun people to chat with! People of all ages, vocations and Spawning Salmon Return interests attend these events and I always meet someone with an interesting story to tell. One to Upper Johnson Creek year I brought my two friends who were visit- By Matt Clark, Executive Director, JCWC ing from New York state and not only did they have a great time, but they entertained their In late 2010, three adult Coho Salmon carcasses and one live adult Coho were seen in work teammates with stories of their east coast mainstem Johnson Creek near the eastern border of Gresham, about 15 miles from the mouth lives and won the prize for having travelled the of Johnson Creek—much farther upstream than spawning Coho have been documented in farthest for a JCWC Watershed Wide Event! recent years. Historically, Coho were abundant throughout the Johnson Creek Watershed, but A few years in a row, I cajoled the members for the last twenty years or more, spawning Coho have only been documented in small numbers of the Milwaukie Riverfront Board, which I in lower Johnson Creek and Crystal Springs Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]