E-CineIndia: Oct-Dec 2020/ Aruna Vasudev 1

Centenary Tribute: Chidananda Dasgupta Aruna Vasudev

CHIDANANDA DASGUPTA MEMORIAL LECTURE

Following is the Text of the Chidananda Dasgupta Memorial Lecture delivered by Aruna Vasudev, Former President of FIPRESCI- on 20 November 2020

Chidananda Dasgupta is a legendary Bilet Pherat and then Amodini which won his figure for film critics and filmmakers in post- wife Supriya the national award for costume Independence India. Perhaps the first serious design. Apart from articles in newspapers and writer on film who became the doyen of film magazines over fifty years, he authored a critics, who joined up with , and a number of books, among them “Talking about handful of others to start the Calcutta Film Films”, “The Painted Face: Studies in India’s Society in 1947, whose love for cinema was so Popular Culture” and “The Cinema of Satyajit deep that he resigned from a lucrative job with Ray and his last one “Seeing is Believing – the then Imperial Tobacco Company to launch Selected Writings on Cinema”. In addition, he into making films himself. translated Jibananda Das’s poetry from Bengali into English. His progeny too, has done him proud - one of his daughters is actress-director , and now so is his granddaughter, Aparana’s daughter, . Not many writers on cinema can match such a background, such a range of accomplishments. It is an exemplary life story. After founding the , the Federation of Film Societies of India was set up at his initiative together with Satyajit Ray, Vijaya Mulay and a few others. This Federation played a major role in the spread of the film society movement in India. I met him many, many years ago. I had just come to India on a visit from my film school days in Paris. I stopped first in Bombay to meet some film people and see what was happening - to know and understand it myself and to respond to questions about Indian cinema at my film school in Paris. This was in He produced and directed a number of the mid-50s when very little about other documentaries and made two feature films – E-CineIndia: Oct-Dec 2020/ Aruna Vasudev 2

cinemas was known in all countries. It was a grandfather). This almost got made by the fascinating moment and I was very excited at British Film Institute, who had approved it. discovering the cinemas of India as much as Victor Banerjee had agreed to play the cinemas of other countries. Meeting Dwarakanath. His daughter Aparna was to be Chidananda Das Gupta together with B D his Chief assistant, but sadly, the project fell Garga at a film function at Bombay was an through at the last moment. enriching moment – that went on to last my I suppose for financial reasons – he life. Chidananda was still working with his had a family to support – he took on a job as company but it was clear that his passion was editor of the magazine published by the cinema. American Embassy, for a few years. That was Years went by as he continued the time we met frequently as they lived working in Calcutta and I was in France. But nearby. That is when Chitu and I sat and wrote we did meet occasionally and it was clear that the script for a feature film but alas, we were he wanted to give up his job and be in the film not able to raise the money for it. And then I world. Eventually he did. He made some came up with the idea of starting a film documentary films, but continued with his job. journal. At that time I thought of journal of a His first feature film Bilet Pherat was well Asian, African and Latin American cinema. received but did not attract very strong We kept discussing the possible ways to raise attention. Popular cinema was ruling the money for it but that, of course, did not audience at that time. happen! Then I thought of starting a magazine He continued making a few exclusively on Asian cinema. I told Chitu I documentaries which did reasonably well . His thought of the name “Cinemaya” and he liked first was Portrait of a City, a documentary on it very much. I put the name on my board next Calcutta produced by the Calcutta Film to my desk and kept dreaming of it - but it Society, then his first feature film – Bilet took a long, long time to materialise… Pherat in 1972 which was also fairly well Later Chitu joined INTACH received – fairly because at that time popular (International Trust for Art & Cultural Hindi cinema was ruling the film world! He Heritage) had recently come into being, and kept up with writing but his love for planned a series of documentary films for filmmaking continued and he made a Doordarshan for INTACH. Approval of the collection of three short features called series was held up for a long time by Shnaarh (The Bull), Gadhaa (The Donkey) Doordarshan. One day when he and I were and Rakto (Blood)- which featured his talking about it, I said I would talk to them daughter Aparna Sen who was on her way to because a college friend of mine had recently becoming a great actress and now a become Head of Doordarshan. Happily the celebrated director. Then two more series was approved, I joined Chidananda (his documentaries – a beautiful one on Birju nickname was Chitu) at INTACH and we got Maharaj call Birju and finally Dance of Shiva. approval for the first series of 13 documentary He made his second feature Amodini in 1994 films. Chitu made the first film, I made the which attracted a great deal of praise, but he 13th film…. decided not to devote his life to making films We got a number of talented directors, though his work on both documentaries. He some already established, some out to make wrote a wonderful script called PRINCE on their first films, to direct the series. Among the Dwarakanath Tagore (Rabindranath's directors were Rajiv Mehrotra – now the E-CineIndia: Oct-Dec 2020/ Aruna Vasudev 3

founder and head of PSBT, and a number of through his writings – as much as the films he others making their first film, plus Pramod managed to make despite so many obligations Mathur, a very well-established documentary in his life , from work to a highly talented filmmaker and other equally well-known family – from wife to daughters. His wife was directors, to make the series. herself a writer, in Bengali, who also There is so much one can write about translated books and various writings. his writings which should be made He kept telling me to come and visit - compulsory reading for film students! He and I really wanted to – having always wanted wrote many articles for us in Cinemaya, also to visit Santiniketan but alas, I never principally on Indian cinema and Indian managed it… Then, when his wife passed filmmakers, which are classics. away, he moved to Aparna’s flat in Calcutta. When Fipresci (International Then I did go there to visit him - and those last Federation of the Film Press) was established days have left a vivid memory….. in India, (because the President and Secretary In his writings there is a depth of of Fipresci – both of whom I knew well - had knowledge and understanding of the art and come to IFFI (the International Film Festival craft of filmmaking together with a sense of of India) - and told me they were so the history and development of cinema in disappointed that Fipresci was not getting India and internationally. It is a joy to relish a established at India’s main Festival. I went collection of his essays on film within a single and spoke to the Secretary I & B Ministry and book. The collection of books he wrote , and he immediately agreed to set it up. his writings over many years, is dense, and Once it was established we all voted erudite, yet witty and humorous, as he makes for Chidananda to be the President but he kept references to the sociological, historical and saying “no, no Aruna should be president”. I political background to the films and the said “no question of that when you are there”! directors he is writing about. One of his essays Finally since he did not have a choice, he had - “Of Margi and Desi”, sets the tone of his to take it on and become the first President of writing as he makes the same distinction Fipresci in India. And, of course, he did a very between the classical and the folk for cinema good job for four or five years. as there is in the other arts, particularly music. He spent a very busy time, and a full His point of reference is not just the frequently life with books, writing, making films and quoted Natyashastra, but the thirteenth century inspiring many of us……. treatise the Sangeet Ratnakara “which makes a As we came to the end of the series at clear distinction between divine and popular INTACH, Chitu and Supriya, his wife, music”. And he goes on to elaborate on the decided to leave Delhi and move to implications and ramifications of this Santiniketan, near Calcutta where his eldest distinction which, he points out, the English daughter Aparna was established. He had translator had not included. It is an decided to retire and continuing with some illuminating inquiry into the origins of this writing, but live peacefully in a beautiful division and turns into a fascinating setting with his wife and youngest daughter. exploration of the relationship of cinema to the Before he left Delhi, he was presented other arts. with the Lifetime Achievement award by His answer in his article “Why Films Osians . He had made such immense Sing” transcends a mere description of music contributions to the emerging new cinema and songs in Indian cinema as he expounds on E-CineIndia: Oct-Dec 2020/ Aruna Vasudev 4

the psychological and sociological imperatives which is perfectly justified – and also that make it such an integral part of India’s necessary because cinema is indeed a very cinema(s). In “Women, Non-violence and relaxing form of entertainment which is also Indian Cinema” he relates the traditional needed in any society. But together with that is Indian view of woman as non-violent, passive, also a cinema that provokes one’s imagination to the non-violence Mahatma Gandhi used as a and thought, and helps to understand the way weapon against the British and sees the “ideal life is, and to cope with it. feminine” in Indian cinema as a corollary of Towards the end he wrote regretfully: social forces. His essay on “Films as Visual "Film criticism has practically Anthropology” is a unique analysis of the disappeared. In all the newspapers the accent work of Aravindan, of Prema Karant’s is on lifestyle writing. There is hardly any Phaniyamma, and others. From “The Crisis in space for film writing anymore. In the past Film Studies” to “How Indian is Indian cinema was dependent on what critics Cinema” to “Cinema takes Over the State” wrote….” (about politics and cinema in South India), his There is so much one can write about writings stretch the boundaries of knowledge, his writings which should be made provoke the reader to question, to argue, to compulsory reading for film students! He make connections, rather than to passively wrote many articles for us in “Cinemaya”, receive. His writings were a boon in an area principally on Indian cinema and Indian where some people – not, alas, all – looked at filmmakers, which are classics. cinema as a great form of art, not just of He spent a very busy time, and a very entertainment. Both were vividly present in full and meaningful life. Indian cinema, as indeed in most countries

Ms. Aruna Vasudev, is a Former President and an Honorary Member of Fipresci-India, based in New Delhi.