The Immune System As a Complex System Eric Leadbetter [email protected] CMSC 491H Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Immune System As a Complex System Eric Leadbetter Elead1@Umbc.Edu CMSC 491H Dr The Immune System as a Complex System Eric Leadbetter [email protected] CMSC 491H Dr. Marie desJardins Introduction The immune system is one of the most critical support systems in a living organism. The immune system serves to protect the body from harmful external agents. In order to accomplish its goal, the immune system requires both a detection mechanism that will discern harmful agents (pathogens) from self and neutral agents and an elimination mechanism to deal with discovered pathogens. Different levels of organismic complexity have increasingly complex detection and elimination mechanisms. The human immune system has a particular attribute that lends itself well to the study of complex systems: that of adaptation. The human immune system is able to “remember” which malicious agents have been encountered and subsequently respond more quickly when these agents are encountered again. In this way, the body can defend against infection much more efficiently. The problem with acquired immunity is that infectious agents are constantly evolving; thus, the immunological memory will lack a record for any newly evolved strains of disease. In addition to acquired immunity, humans have an innate immunity, which is the form of immune system that is also present in lower levels of organismic complexity such as simple eukaryotes, plants, and insects. The innate immune system serves as a primary response to infection by responding to pathogens in a non-specific manner. It promotes a rapid influx of healing agents to infected or injured tissues and serves to activate the adaptive immune system, among other things. A complex adaptive system is defined as such by the fact that the behavior of its agents change with experience as opposed to following the same rules ad infinitum. I will draw parallels between the immune system and complex adaptive systems that will illustrate how the immune system is an example of a biological complex adaptive system. I will conclude with a discussion of my model of the adaptive immune system, written in NetLogo. Metrics of the system will be discussed as well as a reflection on how accurately (or inaccurately) the model represents its intended subject. Furthermore, a discussion of the techniques used to model the immune system will be presented. The Immune System As mentioned, the immune system is one of the most important systems in the body for survival. The immune system serves as a preventative and defensive mechanism against injury and infection for the body. It provides these services through a coordinated effort of many individual agents that all serve a specialized purpose. Beyond simply eliminating harmful agents, the immune system is able to distinguish between harmful and benign foreign agents. The Leukocytes and their Functions The functionality of the immune system is dependent on its components. Cytokines are an integral part of the immune system. Furthermore, the different aspects of the immune system have their own elements that serve special purposes. For example, the innate immune system involves elements such as phagocytes, neutrophils, and natural killer cells. The primary agents of the adaptive immune system are a type of leukocyte called lymphocytes, which are further divided into T cells and B cells[4]. Additionally, dendritic cells function as a link between the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system[1, 12]. Cytokines are protein structures that serve as a communication medium between cells. They are classified based on their structure and their intended receiver(s). Cytokines function by binding to particular surface receptors on their target cells. This leads to the alteration of cellular function[6]. Cytokines are used to trigger the production of T cells and also to attract other cells to the site of injury to repair damage and defend against possible infection[24]. Phagocytes serve to dispose of pathogens and dead tissue. After activation, phagocytes engulf the target object and internalize it, where it is incorporated into the lysosome of the phagocyte. There, the target object is disposed of via destruction or attrition (starvation)[20]. A sub-type of phagocytes is the macrophage. Macrophages are essentially phagocytes that can move around by a process known as chemotaxis. However, they typically stay in a particular region and recruit more macrophages as necessary to deal with a problem[14]. Macrophages also play a significant role in the adaptive immune system, which will be covered shortly. Two other types of cells of importance in the innate immune system are neutrophils and Natural Killer cells. Both serve as direct combatants against infection. Neutrophils serve by migrating toward infection sites via chemotaxis and recruiting other immune cells, in addition to direct combat[19]. Natural Killer cells primarily deal with tumors and virally infected cells; NK cells can either trigger apoptosis—programmed cell death—in infected cells or cause lysis—a degradation of the cell—in tumors. This difference in method is for containing viruses: apoptosis will kill the infecting virus inside the cell, whereas lysis would rupture the cellular membrane, releasing the virus to infection other cells[18]. In order for activation of the adaptive immune system to take place, a notice of infection must be communicated to the lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system. Dendritic cells serve this purpose. Dendritic cells, while similar in appearance, are unrelated to neurons. Dendritic cells reside on tissue that is exposed to the external environment (i.e., the skin or the stomach lining). They serve to present antigens to T cells in order to stimulate specific responses to pathogens[8]. Antigens are molecules that trigger the production of an antibody (in B cells) or the recruitment of combatant cells (by T cells) to counter whichever pathogen produces the antigen. There exists a category of cells that specialize in efficiently presenting antigens to T cells. The antigen presentation is done via molecules called the major histocompatibility complexes (MHC). Every cell in the body has Class I MHC molecules; however, only professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) use Class II MHC molecules to present their information[15]. Dendritic cells are one form of APCs. Other APCs include macrophages and B cells[2]. Macrophages, as mentioned before, are a major factor in the innate immune system. However, they also serve the purpose of presenting antigens. After phagocytosis, macrophages will present the antigen of the digested pathogen for detection by a T cell. B cells are able to perform a similar task, although they also serve entirely different purposes that will be covered shortly. The adaptive immune system involves yet more types of cells. The cells involved in the adaptive immune system are called lymphocytes (or white blood cells). There are three types of lymphocytes, which are Natural Killer cells which have been discussed because they are involved in the innate immune system, T cells which drive the cell-mediated immune response (a subtype of the adaptive immune system), and B cells which are involved in both activation of the cell-mediated response and in a separate response type known as humoral immunity[13]. Additionally, macrophages play a role in the adaptive immune system. First, I will discuss T cells, the major player in cell-mediated immunity. Cell-mediated immunity involves immune cells triggering apoptosis (programmed cell death) in infected cells and performing phagocytosis via macrophages, which activated T cells can stimulate into a more aggressive state[5]. There are several different types of T cells, all with specific purposes: The first of these to mention are helper T cells (Th cells). Unusually when compared to other lymphocytes, Th cells are unable to kill pathogens; their purpose is to release cytokines after binding to their specific matching antigen (called their cognate antigen). Antigens must be presented to Th cells by APCs. These cytokines are used to activate and stimulate growth of cytotoxic T cells (to be discussed), activate the adaptive response of macrophages, and to help with the maturation of B cells. Th cells, like several other leukocytes, go through a maturation process which will be discussed in a subsequent section. Secondly, there are cytotoxic T cells (Tc cells). Tc cells induce death of cells infected by pathogens. Their activation is triggered by binding to antigens presented at Class I MHC molecules on any cell, as opposed to the activation of Th cells by Class II MHC molecules on macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells[7]. Thirdly, memory T cells can be thought of as the “veterans” of the cell-mediated immune response. Memory T cells are T cells that have been previously activated by their cognate antigen. This is significant because if a memory T cell is activated by its cognate again, it is able to rapidly reproduce to more efficiently defend against an infectious agent[16]. Alternatively to T cells, B cells form an entirely separate type of adaptive immune response called the humoral immune response. The primary function of B cells is to produce antibodies, which are the central effectors of the humoral immune system. Antibodies function by binding to antigens which effectively “tags” the pathogen or infected cell for attack by other immune cells; additionally, the binding of antibodies to antigens can sometimes block parts of a pathogen that are required for its effectiveness, essentially neutralizing it. There are two main types of B cells. The first are plasma cells; plasma cells are B cells that have been exposed to their specific antigen and rapidly produce antibodies to bind to the antigen. Once their specific pathogen has been dealt with, plasma cells undergo apoptosis. The second type of B cell is the memory B cell which is analogous to the memory T cell[3]. We will revisit the development of the components of the adaptive immune system in the later section that defines how the immune system is a complex system.
Recommended publications
  • What Is a Complex Adaptive System?
    PROJECT GUTS What is a Complex Adaptive System? Introduction During the last three decades a leap has been made from the application of computing to help scientists ‘do’ science to the integration of computer science concepts, tools and theorems into the very fabric of science. The modeling of complex adaptive systems (CAS) is an example of such an integration of computer science into the very fabric of science; models of complex systems are used to understand, predict and prevent the most daunting problems we face today; issues such as climate change, loss of biodiversity, energy consumption and virulent disease affect us all. The study of complex adaptive systems, has come to be seen as a scientific frontier, and an increasing ability to interact systematically with highly complex systems that transcend separate disciplines will have a profound affect on future science, engineering and industry as well as in the management of our planet’s resources (Emmott et al., 2006). The name itself, “complex adaptive systems” conjures up images of complicated ideas that might be too difficult for a novice to understand. Instead, the study of CAS does exactly the opposite; it creates a unified method of studying disparate systems that elucidates the processes by which they operate. A complex system is simply a system in which many independent elements or agents interact, leading to emergent outcomes that are often difficult (or impossible) to predict simply by looking at the individual interactions. The “complex” part of CAS refers in fact to the vast interconnectedness of these systems. Using the principles of CAS to study these topics as related disciplines that can be better understood through the application of models, rather than a disparate collection of facts can strengthen learners’ understanding of these topics and prepare them to understand other systems by applying similar methods of analysis (Emmott et al., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Capacity and Traps
    Copyright © 2008 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Carpenter, S. R., and W. A. Brock. 2008. Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecology and Society 13(2): 40. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art40/ Insight Adaptive Capacity and Traps Stephen R. Carpenter 1 and William A. Brock 1 ABSTRACT. Adaptive capacity is the ability of a living system, such as a social–ecological system, to adjust responses to changing internal demands and external drivers. Although adaptive capacity is a frequent topic of study in the resilience literature, there are few formal models. This paper introduces such a model and uses it to explore adaptive capacity by contrast with the opposite condition, or traps. In a social– ecological rigidity trap, strong self-reinforcing controls prevent the flexibility needed for adaptation. In the model, too much control erodes adaptive capacity and thereby increases the risk of catastrophic breakdown. In a social–ecological poverty trap, loose connections prevent the mobilization of ideas and resources to solve problems. In the model, too little control impedes the focus needed for adaptation. Fluctuations of internal demand or external shocks generate pulses of adaptive capacity, which may gain traction and pull the system out of the poverty trap. The model suggests some general properties of traps in social–ecological systems. It is general and flexible, so it can be used as a building block in more specific and detailed models of adaptive capacity for a particular region. Key Words: adaptation; allostasis; model; poverty trap; resilience; rigidity trap; transformation INTRODUCTION it seems empty of ideas, it will be abandoned or transformed into something else.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems That Adapt to Their Users
    Systems That Adapt to Their Users Anthony Jameson and Krzysztof Z. Gajos DFKI, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Introduction This chapter covers a broad range of interactive systems which have one idea in common: that it can be worthwhile for a system to learn something about individual users and adapt its behavior to them in some nontrivial way. A representative example is shown in Figure 20.1: the COMMUNITYCOMMANDS recommender plug-in for AUTO- CAD (introduced by Matejka, Li, Grossman, & Fitzmau- rice, 2009, and discussed more extensively by Li, Mate- jka, Grossman, Konstan, & Fitzmaurice, 2011). To help users deal with the hundreds of commands that AUTO- CAD offers—of which most users know only a few dozen— COMMUNITYCOMMANDS (a) gives the user easy access to several recently used commands, which the user may want to invoke again soon; and (b) more proactively suggests com- mands that this user has not yet used but may find useful, Figure 20.1: Screenshot showing how COMMUNITY- given the type of work they have been doing recently. COMMANDS recommends commands to a user. (Image supplied by Justin Matejka. The length of the darker bar for a com- Concepts mand reflects its estimated relevance to the user’s activities. When the user A key idea embodied in COMMUNITYCOMMANDS and the hovers over a command in this interface, a tooltip appears that explains the command and might show usage hints provided by colleagues. See also other systems discussed in this chapter is that of adapta- http://www.autodesk.com/research.) tion to the individual user.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education As a Complex Adaptive System: Considerations for Leadership and Scale
    Hartzler, R., & Blair, R. (Eds.) (2019). Emerging issues in mathematics pathways: Case studies, scans of the field, and recommendations. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin. Available at www.dcmathpathways.org/learn-about/emerging-issues-mathematics-pathways Copyright 2019 Chapter 6 Higher Education as a Complex Adaptive System: Considerations for Leadership and Scale Jeremy Martin The Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin Abstract As state policies, economic pressures, and enrollment declines increase pressure on higher education systems to rapidly improve student outcomes in mathematics, many institutions have transformed the way they do business and have adopted mathematics pathways at scale. At the same time, many systems of higher education have struggled to move from piloting mathematics pathways to implementing reforms at a scale that supports every student’s success in postsecondary mathematics. Drawing on complexity science, this chapter presents a conceptual framework for leaders at all levels of higher education systems to design change strategies to adopt mathematics pathways principles at scale. How leaders think about the systems that they work in has material consequences for designing, implementing, and sustaining scaling strategies. The chapter offers a framework and recommendations for understanding higher education as a complex adaptive system and the role of strategic leadership in designing, implementing, and sustaining reforms at scale. Emerging Issues in Mathematics Pathways: Case Studies, Scans of the Field, and Recommendations 57 Introduction Higher Education as a Complex Adaptive System After decades of innovation and research on improving student success in postsecondary The term system refers to a set of connected parts mathematics, a convincing body of evidence that together form a complex whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper
    Language Learning ISSN 0023-8333 Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper The “Five Graces Group” Clay Beckner Nick C. Ellis University of New Mexico University of Michigan Richard Blythe John Holland University of Edinburgh Santa Fe Institute; University of Michigan Joan Bybee Jinyun Ke University of New Mexico University of Michigan Morten H. Christiansen Diane Larsen-Freeman Cornell University University of Michigan William Croft Tom Schoenemann University of New Mexico Indiana University Language has a fundamentally social function. Processes of human interaction along with domain-general cognitive processes shape the structure and knowledge of lan- guage. Recent research in the cognitive sciences has demonstrated that patterns of use strongly affect how language is acquired, is used, and changes. These processes are not independent of one another but are facets of the same complex adaptive system (CAS). Language as a CAS involves the following key features: The system consists of multiple agents (the speakers in the speech community) interacting with one another. This paper, our agreed position statement, was circulated to invited participants before a conference celebrating the 60th Anniversary of Language Learning, held at the University of Michigan, on the theme Language is a Complex Adaptive System. Presenters were asked to focus on the issues presented here when considering their particular areas of language in the conference and in their articles in this special issue of Language Learning. The evolution of this piece was made possible by the Sante Fe Institute (SFI) though its sponsorship of the “Continued Study of Language Acquisition and Evolution” workgroup meeting, Santa Fe Institute, 1–3 March 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Adaptive Systems: Exploring the Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 40, Number 1, Pages 3{19 S 0273-0979(02)00965-5 Article electronically published on October 9, 2002 COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS: EXPLORING THE KNOWN, THE UNKNOWN AND THE UNKNOWABLE SIMON A. LEVIN Abstract. The study of complex adaptive systems, from cells to societies, is a study of the interplay among processes operating at diverse scales of space, time and organizational complexity. The key to such a study is an under- standing of the interrelationships between microscopic processes and macro- scopic patterns, and the evolutionary forces that shape systems. In particular, for ecosystems and socioeconomic systems, much interest is focused on broad scale features such as diversity and resiliency, while evolution operates most powerfully at the level of individual agents. Understanding the evolution and development of complex adaptive systems thus involves understanding how cooperation, coalitions and networks of interaction emerge from individual be- haviors and feed back to influence those behaviors. In this paper, some of the mathematical challenges are discussed. 1. Introduction The notion of complex adaptive systems has found expression in everything from cells to societies, in general with reference to the self-organization of complex enti- ties, across scales of space, time and organizational complexity. Much of our under- standing of complex adaptive systems comes from observations of Nature, or from simulations, and a daunting challenge is to summarize these observations mathe- matically. In essence, we need a statistical mechanics of heterogeneous populations, in which new types are continuously appearing through a variety of mechanisms, mostly unpredictable in their details.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Adaptive Systems
    Evidence scan: Complex adaptive systems August 2010 Identify Innovate Demonstrate Encourage Contents Key messages 3 1. Scope 4 2. Concepts 6 3. Sectors outside of healthcare 10 4. Healthcare 13 5. Practical examples 18 6. Usefulness and lessons learnt 24 References 28 Health Foundation evidence scans provide information to help those involved in improving the quality of healthcare understand what research is available on particular topics. Evidence scans provide a rapid collation of empirical research about a topic relevant to the Health Foundation's work. Although all of the evidence is sourced and compiled systematically, they are not systematic reviews. They do not seek to summarise theoretical literature or to explore in any depth the concepts covered by the scan or those arising from it. This evidence scan was prepared by The Evidence Centre on behalf of the Health Foundation. © 2010 The Health Foundation Previously published as Research scan: Complex adaptive systems Key messages Complex adaptive systems thinking is an approach that challenges simple cause and effect assumptions, and instead sees healthcare and other systems as a dynamic process. One where the interactions and relationships of different components simultaneously affect and are shaped by the system. This research scan collates more than 100 articles The scan suggests that a complex adaptive systems about complex adaptive systems thinking in approach has something to offer when thinking healthcare and other sectors. The purpose is to about leadership and organisational development provide a synopsis of evidence to help inform in healthcare, not least of which because it may discussions and to help identify if there is need for challenge taken for granted assumptions and further research or development in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Systems: History, Techniques, Problems, and Perspectives
    Systems 2014, 2, 606-660; doi:10.3390/systems2040606 OPEN ACCESS systems ISSN 2079-8954 www.mdpi.com/journal/systems Article Adaptive Systems: History, Techniques, Problems, and Perspectives William S. Black 1;?, Poorya Haghi 2 and Kartik B. Ariyur 1 1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Cymer LLC, 17075 Thornmint Court, San Diego, CA 92127, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] ? Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. External Editors: Gianfranco Minati and Eliano Pessa Received: 6 August 2014; in revised form: 15 September 2014 / Accepted: 17 October 2014 / Published: 11 November 2014 Abstract: We survey some of the rich history of control over the past century with a focus on the major milestones in adaptive systems. We review classic methods and examples in adaptive linear systems for both control and observation/identification. The focus is on linear plants to facilitate understanding, but we also provide the tools necessary for many classes of nonlinear systems. We discuss practical issues encountered in making these systems stable and robust with respect to additive and multiplicative uncertainties. We discuss various perspectives on adaptive systems and their role in various fields. Finally, we present some of the ongoing research and expose problems in the field of adaptive control. Keywords: systems; adaptation; control; identification; nonlinear 1. Introduction Any system—engineering, natural, biological, or social—is considered adaptive if it can maintain its performance, or survive in spite of large changes in its environment or in its own components.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Adaptive Systems Theory Applied to Virtual Scientific Collaborations: the Case of Dataone
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2011 Complex adaptive systems theory applied to virtual scientific collaborations: The case of DataONE Arsev Umur Aydinoglu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons Recommended Citation Aydinoglu, Arsev Umur, "Complex adaptive systems theory applied to virtual scientific collaborations: The case of DataONE. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1054 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Arsev Umur Aydinoglu entitled "Complex adaptive systems theory applied to virtual scientific collaborations: The case of DataONE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Communication and Information. Suzie Allard, Major Professor We
    [Show full text]
  • Society As a Complex Adaptive System
    59. Society as a CompIex Adaptive System WALTER DUCKLEY WE HAVE ARGUED at some length in another place1 istic is its functioning to maintain the given struc- that the mechanical equilibrium model and the ture of the system within pre-established limits. It organismic homeostasis models of society that involves feedback loops with its environment, and have underlain most modern sociological theory possibly information as well as pure energy inter- have outlived their usefulness. A more viable changes, but these are geared principally to self- model, one much more faithful to the kind of regubtion (structure maintenance) rather than adap- system that society is more and more recognized tation (change of system structure). The complex to k,is in process of developing out of, or is in adaptive systems {species, psychological and socio- keeping with, the modern systems perspective cultural systems) are also open and negentropic. (which we use loosely here to refer to general But they are oppn "internally" us well as externally systems research, cybernetics, information and in that the interchanges among their components communication theory, and related fields). Society, may result in significant changr.s in the nature of or the sociocultural system, is not, then, principally the components theinselves with important con- an equilibrium system or a homeostatic system, sequences for the system as a whole. And the but what we shalt simply refer to as a complex energy level that may be mobilized by the system adaptive system. is subject to relatively wide fluctuation. Internal To summarize the argument in ove~lysimplified as well as external interchanges are mediated form: Equilibria1 systems are relatively closed and characteristically by infirmation flows (via chemi- entropic.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Schools As Complex Adaptive Systems / Fidan & Balcı
    September 2017, Volume 10, Issue 1 Received: 29 March 2017 Managing schools as complex adaptive Revised: 22 August 2017 systems: A strategic perspective Accepted: 12 Sept. 2017 ISSN: 1307-9298 Copyright © IEJEE a b Tuncer Fidan , Ali Balcı www.iejee.com DOI: 10.26822/iejee.2017131883 Abstract This conceptual study examines the analogies between schools and complex adaptive systems and identifies strategies used to manage schools as complex adaptive systems. Complex adaptive systems approach, introduced by the complexity theory, requires school administrators to develop new skills and strategies to realize their agendas in an ever-changing and complexifying environment without any expectations of stability and predictability. The results indicated that in this period administrators need to have basic skills such as (a) diagnosing patterns emerging from complexity, (b) manipulating the environment by anticipating potential patterns organizations may evolve into, (c) choosing organizational structures compatible with an ever-changing and complexifying environment and (d) promoting innovation to create and manage organizational changes. Although these skills enable administrators to reduce complexity into a manageable form to some extent, stakeholders’ having a common perspective regarding their schools and environments, and executing their activities in accordance with a shared vision are required to turn these skills into complexity management strategies. Keywords: Schools, complexity, complex adaptive systems, complexity management Introduction In the uncertain and constantly changing organizational Even scientists have not agreed on the definition of the environment of the information society, assumptions of term as complexity is a phenomenon arising from the order and predictability have gradually had a less part in interaction among numerous things (Johnson, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 656 Machine Learning and Adaptive Systems
    Fall 2015 ECE 656 Machine Learning and Adaptive Systems Course Credits: 03 Prerequisites: EE 512 or equivalent and ECE303 knowledge of Random Variables Class Hours: 11:00a.m-12:15p.m. Tuesdays and Thursdays Place: Wager 107B Textbook: S. Haykin, “Neural Networks and Learning Machines”, Prentice-Hall, 3nd Ed, 2008. Instructor: Dr. M. R. Azimi, Professor C201E Engineering Building Phone: (970)-491-7956 E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: 3:30-4:30p.m. TR Grader: Yajing Liu Office Hours: TBD Objective: The objective of this course is to introduce the students to adaptive system theory and machine learning techniques. Particular emphasis will be placed on different adaptation algorithms, learning discriminants, statistical pattern recognition, supervised and unsupervised learning, kernel machines for classification, regression and information retrieval, generative classifiers, manifold learning, and applications in signal/image processing areas. Upon completion of this course students will: (a) Apply adaptive system theory and methods for various learning models, (a) Evaluate different machine learning and artificial neural network systems, (b) Gain exposure to a wide range of application areas, (c) Design and implement a machine learning system for a given problem, (d) Analyze the performance of the designed systems using different performance metrics. Course Outline: 1. Introduction to biological nervous systems 2. Fundamentals of artificial neural networks 3. Adaptive filter theory, algorithms and structures 4. Least mean squares (LMS) and recursive least squares (RLS) adaptive rules 5. Regularization theory and applications 6. Statistical pattern classification 7. Learning discriminants, Layered machines 8. Supervised and Unsupervised learning 9. Self-organization and Associative memories 10.
    [Show full text]