Harrow & Wealdstone Area Action Plan Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harrow & Wealdstone Area Action Plan Consultation Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan Regulation 21(1)(c)(i-iv) Consultation Statement LDF Local Development Framework May 2012 1. Introduction 1.1 Consultation on the Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan Issues and Options document took place between 13th May and 24th June 2011. Consultation on the Preferred Option document took place between 12th January and 23rd February 2012. Both rounds of consultation were undertaken in accordance with the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement and in line with regulations that were in place at the time (Regulation 25 of the Town and Country Planning Local Development Regulations 2004, as amended). These regulations required the Council to produce a statement (the 'Consultation Statement') setting out the consultation undertaken in the course of preparing the Area Action Plan, a summary of the main issues raised to consultation, and to detail how the Council’s took account of the comments received in preparing subsequent versions of the plan, including the latest version - the Pre-Submission version of the Area Action Plan. 1.2 Since consultation on the Preferred Option was undertaken in January 2012, new regulations have been published. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning)(England) Regulations 2012 came into effect on 6th April 2012. While the numbering of the regulations has changed, the requirement upon the Council to produce a Consultation Statement has not changed. This Consultation Statement therefore fulfils the requirements under the new Regulation 22(1)(c)(i-iv) to produce a statement of the plan’s production (and represents the former Regulation (30)(1)(d) Consultation Statement). 2. Summary of consultation undertaken on the Area Action Plan Issues and Options consultation document 2.1 Upon commencement of the project to prepare an Area Action Plan (AAP) for the Harrow and Wealdstone Intensification Area, the Council established a cross-agency officer working group, comprising membership from the Council; the Greater London Authority; Transport for London; the Homes and Communities Agency; and representatives from the engagement forums (see below). The purpose of the working group was to provide specialist technical input into the preparation of the AAP. A Project Board was also established comprising director level representation from each of the authorities as well as the relevant Council Portfolio Holders. The purpose of the Board was to have oversight of the development of the AAP, including the monitoring of progress against deliverables, the adequate resourcing the project (both financial and staff time), and providing the political and agency sign-off required for key project milestones. 2.2 In addition to the Officer Working Group and Project Board, the Council also established a number of engagement forums as follows: The Landowners, Developers and Agents Forum – comprising membership of active local agents, key landowners within the Intensification Area, and developers with an interest in sites within the Intensification Area or active across the Borough; The Community Forum – comprising membership of local community groups, residents’ associations, and amenity societies; The Local Business Forum – comprising membership of local businesses, Harrow in Business, and the town centre managers for Harrow and Wealdstone town centres; The Youth Forum – comprising membership from the Harrow Youth Parliament as we as those actively involved in the Harrow MyCity2 project. 2.3 The engagement forums were set up to help champion and develop the AAP. Each was chaired by an independently appointed representative, who was then also appointed onto the Officer Working Group. The initial meetings of the engagement forum groups were held in September 2010 and were used to raise awareness of the purpose of preparing the AAP, its broad objectives, the statutory process required to prepare a Development Plan Document, and the requirements for plan making in terms of soundness and a robust evidence base. Subsequent forum meetings, held in October – November 2010, were used as a sounding board to confirm the key issues, challenges and opportunities facing the area currently and/or over the coming years, and to test alternative broad spatial development options for the area. 2.4 On 7th April 2011, Harrow’s Cabinet considered a report on the Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan (see http://www.harrow.gov.uk/www2/documents/s74493/Harrow%20and%20Wealdstone%20AAP.pdf ). At that meeting Cabinet recommended the AAP be referred to Full Council for approval. 2.5 On 14th April 2011, Full Council endorsed the Area Action Plan Issues and Options document and resolved to publish the document for consultation for a period of six weeks. 2.6 In addition to the above Council sign-off, the Deputy Major for London also formally signed off on the AAP Issues & Options document for public consultation on behalf of the Greater London Authority. 2.7 In summary, the Issues and Options document put forward four broad alternative spatial development options for consideration by the community. The four broad options, including a brief commentary of their respective strengths and weaknesses, were: Option 1: One Centre – This option would see the three sub-areas (Harrow town centre, Wealdstone town centre and Station Road) being joined together by a shared intensification of activity, reducing any distinctions between the areas and, over time, see them developed as one large centre. This is a highly ambitious option that requires the maximization of the capacity of all strategic sites within the Intensification Area with development types (housing and employment) and densities being applied equally across the whole area. As a result, this option offers the highest overall outcomes in terms of levels of residential development and job outputs but this is likely to be at the cost of local context. This option may also not be compatible with existing levels of public transport accessibility and there is a risk that the market might not be able to absorb this level of development. Option 2: Harrow + – In this option, intensification and development would be focused on Harrow town centre. It would ensure the centre’s Metropolitan status was enhanced and retained, and would see significant public realm and infrastructure improvements delivered in the centre that would benefit the wider community. However, it would require most housing to be met in tall, flatted schemes, which presents risks in terms of market saturation as well as opposition from residents to see this form of development within the town centre. The option would only result in modest growth and benefits for Station Road and Wealdstone, and therefore does not optimize the regeneration opportunities that exist within these sub-areas. Option 3: Two Centres – This option would retain and reinforce the distinctiveness of Harrow town centre and Wealdstone, ensuring new development is sensitive to these areas. Growth would be focused within the two town centres, with flatted housing development in Harrow town centre (but at a much reduced scale than required under option 2) and the provision of family orientated housing in Wealdstone. The regeneration of Wealdstone will also benefit from housing and employment development of the Kodak site. Station Road does not play a significant role under this option, and therefore the opportunity to strengthen its role as a link between the two town centres and to regenerate Station Road will be missed. Option 4: High Roads and Centres – This option is similar to option 3, but with the additional benefit of realizing the development opportunities that exist along Station Road, which would facilitate much needed public realm improvements along this corridor. However, this option would require appropriate controls and more detailed guidance to be put in place to ensure the three sub-areas retained their distinctiveness, in terms of function and built form, and did not morph into one homogenous entity as proposed by Option 1. 2.8 To secure the widest possible understanding of the modelled outputs, housing densities were presented in the consultation document as five typologies and equated to forms of existing residential development in the Borough from lower density traditional family housing to higher density modern blocks of flats. Similarly, the employment outputs were expressed as numbers of jobs in office, industrial, retail & leisure and other sectors. To convey how the modelled outputs might vary between the three component parts of the Intensification Area, the distribution of housing and job types was disaggregated in relation to Harrow town centre, Wealdstone and Station Road, with a further modest allowance for additional & infill sites. 2.9 Formal notification of the AAP Issues and Options Publication (old Regulation 25) was given on 13th May 2011, and representations were invited for a six week period ending 24th June 2011. Representations were also invited on the Sustainability Appraisal during this period. 2.10 A formal notice setting out the proposals matters and representations procedure was placed in the ‘Harrow Observer’ newspaper on both the 12th and 19th of May 2011 (see Appendix A). In addition, on 12th May 2011 a total of 1,045 letters (see Appendix B) were sent by post or email to all contacts on the LDF database (see Appendix C), including all appropriate general consultation bodies. Enclosed with the letter was the Statement of the Representations Procedure (see Appendix D), a questionnaire (see Appendix E) and explanatory notes on how to use Council’s on-line consultation portal. Those emailed were also provided with the web link to the documents on the Council’s consultation portal and LDF web pages. All specific consultation bodies (see Appendix F) were sent a letter by post (see Appendix G) on 12th May 2011. Enclosed with the letter was a hard copy of the AAP Issues and Options document, the Statement of the Representations Procedure, the questionnaire and response form, as well as a CD containing the Sustainability Appraisal Report, the Equalities Impact Assessment, an electronic copy of the AAP Issues and Options document, and the Baseline Report.
Recommended publications
  • Harrow Natural History Society 50Th Anniversary
    HARROW NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 50TH ANNIVERSARY Miss Pollard who was the chief Librarian in Harrow founded the Harrow Natural History Society in 1970. The first venue for indoor meetings was Wealdstone Library in Grant Road. The Society studied two main areas – Harrow Weald Common and Bentley Priory Open Space. Nature Trails were laid out on both these sites and records of the wild life collected. Miss Pollard retired and left the area in December 1973, she had been Chairman of the Society. Alan Tinsey took over this role when she left. He had already produced the first journal using the knowledge of members many of whom were very familiar with the district. He went on to produce four more journals but by this time articles were getting hard to find and it was decided to produce a newsletter telling members about the work of the Society which would be sent out to members with their programmes. This newsletter was compiled by a separate committee and it continued afterwards. Alan and Geoff Corney who had been Secretary since the beginning, both retired at the AGM in 1979. Geoff had been very active in the work of the Society and felt he needed a rest. George Alexander became the new Chairman and Kevin Reidy became the new Secretary. Two further publications were under discussion about the local wild flowers and birds. Jack Phillips a very knowledgeable botanist suggested the Society should produce a simple guide to the wild flowers. Merle Marsden undertook to do this. She collected a small group of helpers and produced the first flower book.
    [Show full text]
  • Watford Junction – Bushey – Harrow & Wealdstone – Wembley Central – London
    General information Notes & symbols ) PLUSBUS through ticketing available Holiday periods London Northwestern Customer Transport Focus & We will be running amended timetables over Relations web: transportfocus.org.uk bus service Christmas, Easter and May bank holidays. Details You can get in touch with our customer relations email: [email protected] 4 will be available in online journey planners and team between 0700–1900 on weekdays, and twitter: @transportfocus operated by 4 coach train 8 information displayed at our stations. 0800–1600 at weekends. tel: 0300 123 2350 operated by 8 coach train 12 post: Freepost (RTEH-XAGE-BYKZ), operated by 12 coach train Bring your bike web: londonnorthwesternrailway.co.uk/contact-us Transport Focus, PO Box 5594, Bikes (except tandems) are welcome on board our tel: 0333 311 0006 Southend-on-Sea, SS1 9PZ Services operated by London Northwestern trains but please be extra careful when it’s busy. On (standard call rates) Railway unless otherwise shown. weekdays, only folding bikes are allowed on trains post: Freepost London Northwestern Railway, Rail User Groups arriving at London Euston between 0700 –1000, Customer Relations If you’d like to be more involved with the SN operated by Southern and departing between 1600 –1900. development of rail services, why not join your London Travelwatch local rail user group. b occasionally this train may be formed of 8 Getting assistance at the station web: londontravelwatch.org.uk coaches. Passengers travelling to Bushey Call us on 0333 311 0006 if you need some help email: [email protected] Watford Rail Users Group must travel in the front 4 coaches only.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentley Priory Circular Walk
    , Stanmore , ay W Lodge Old 5. arren Lane arren W on park car Common Stanmore 4. 3. Priory Drive stop on 142 bus 142 on stop Drive Priory 3. details. 2. Priory Close stop on 258 bus 258 on stop Close Priory 2. deer - see text for for text see - deer pub missing the tame tame the missing August 2016 August Forum Conservation Nature Altered Altered is Case The of west just park, car Redding Old 1. licence way means means way , Creative Commons Commons Creative , Geezer Diamond by Image Leaflet revised and redesigned by Harrow Harrow by redesigned and revised Leaflet but going this this going but Altered. is Case The at the corresponding pink circle pink corresponding the at Stanmore Hill, Hill, Stanmore by pink circles on the maps. For each, start reading the text text the reading start each, For maps. the on circles pink by newsagents on on newsagents There are five good starting points for the walk, indicated indicated walk, the for points starting good five are There available at a a at available confectionery are are confectionery (LOOP), a 150 mile route encircling London. encircling route mile 150 a (LOOP), and and Parts of the route follow the London Outer Orbital Path Path Orbital Outer London the follow route the of Parts Canned drinks drinks Canned on the maps. maps. the on . badly stomachs their upset close to point 1 1 point to close The deer must not be fed bread which will will which bread fed be not must deer The along. suitable on the route, route, the on , take something something take , party the in children have you if especially Altered pub lies lies pub Altered love vegetables (especially carrots) and apples - so so - apples and carrots) (especially vegetables love The Case is is Case The ou will pass a private deer park with tame fallow deer that that deer fallow tame with park deer private a pass will ou Y eshments Refr wildflowers that make this area so attractive.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard-Tube-Map.Pdf
    Tube map 123456789 Special fares apply Special fares Check before you travel 978868 7 57Cheshunt Epping apply § Custom House for ExCeL Chesham Watford Junction 9 Station closed until late December 2017. Chalfont & Enfield Town Theydon Bois Latimer Theobalds Grove --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Watford High Street Bush Hill Debden Shenfield § Watford Hounslow West Amersham Cockfosters Park Turkey Street High Barnet Loughton 6 Step-free access for manual wheelchairs only. A Chorleywood Bushey A --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Southbury Chingford Buckhurst Hill § Lancaster Gate Rickmansworth Brentwood Carpenders Park Woodside Park Southgate 5 Station closed until August 2017. Edmonton Green Moor Park Roding Grange Valley --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hatch End Mill Hill East West Finchley Arnos Grove Hill Northwood Silver Street Highams Park § Victoria 4 Harold Wood Chigwell West Ruislip Headstone Lane Edgware Bounds Green Step-free access is via the Cardinal Place White Hart Lane Northwood Hills Stanmore Hainault Gidea Park Finchley Central Woodford entrance. Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Wood Green Pinner Wealdstone Burnt Oak Bruce Grove Ruislip Manor Harringay Wood Street Fairlop Romford --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Canons Park Green South Woodford East Finchley Uxbridge Ickenham North Harrow Colindale Turnpike Lane Lanes
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) Volume II – Technical
    London Borough of Harrow Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 SFRA) Volume II – Technical June 2009 Client: London Borough of Harrow Council Project: Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Document Title: Volume II – Technical Report MWH Project Code: 41515318.010101 Document No: FINAL Prepared by Version Date Description/Amendment Checked by Reviewed by (Author) A August 2008 Preliminary Draft Report Jacquie Hannan Gaye McKay Steve Dickie B November 2008 Draft Report Jacquie Hannan Steve Dickie Steve Dickie C April 2009 Final Draft Report Jacquie Hannan Steve Dickie Steve Dickie D June 2009 Final Report Jacquie Hannan Steve Dickie Steve Dickie PLEASE DESTROY ALL SUPERSEDED COPIES OR CLEARLY MARK THEM AS “SUPERSEDED” UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED File Location Date Admin Check by S:\NBE\Flood Risk\Harrow SFRA\Technical\T5 - Reports\Final Report\Harrow SFRA (Final Technical Report).doc OPTIONAL EXTRA IF REQUIRED BY PROJECT MANAGER: Distribution: Name Copy No. London Borough of Harrow Council - Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume II – Technical Report 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The London Borough of Harrow is subject to riverine flooding from a number of watercourses, most notably the River Pinn and Wealdstone, Yeading and Edgware Brooks. The Borough also experiences pluvial, surface water and sewer flooding. In accordance with ‘Planning Policy Statement 25 (PPS25): Development and Flood Risk’, this Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) provides an assessment of all types of flood risk within the London Borough of Harrow to inform land use planning decisions. Specifically, it provides an overview of: • main sources of flooding; • potential flood risk in the Borough; • the predicted influences of climate change; • identification of options to mitigate the potential flood risk; • the potential flood risk at allocated sites within the Borough; and • relevant planning controls, appropriate sustainable design of developments and mitigation that will be sought in new development and in the retrofitting of existing buildings and extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document
    Contents Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document 1. Introduction 2 2. Policy Context 6 3. Portrait of the Intensification Area 9 4. Key Issues, Challenges and Drivers 15 5. Generating the Options 21 6. Spatial Development Strategy 28 Options 7. Delivery and Implementation 40 Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document 1 Introduction 1.1 The Harrow Core Strategy identifies the Harrow and Wealdstone Intensification Area as a focus for future growth and development within the Borough. The Intensification Area, shown in Figure 1, is recognised in the replacement London Plan and the Harrow Core Strategy as being a location that can accommodate change and has capacity to do so. However, such change must be managed in a clear and comprehensive manner. 1.2 As set out in the Core Strategy, the Intensification Area is not just about providing for new development and physical growth, it is also about regeneration and the realisation of the social benefits and improvements to the overall quality of place that new development can deliver. The Council and the Greater London Authority (GLA), in partnership with Homes and Communities Agency, Transport for London and the London Development Agency, are therefore preparing a joint Area Action Plan for the Intensification Area. The purpose of the Area Action Plan is to provide a detailed and pro-active policy framework to guide development, regeneration and investment decisions across the area over the next fifteen years and beyond. Picture 1.1 Boundary of the Harrow and Wealdstone Intensification Area 1.3 In respect of the boundary for the Intensification Area, this has already been confirmed through the Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow Council School Travel Plan Strategy
    Draft HARROW COUNCIL SCHOOL TRAVEL PLAN STRATEGY 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 2 2.0 MAIN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES.................................... 3 2.1 The School Run and Car Use ...................................................... 3 2.3 Walking to School ........................................................................ 4 2.4 Parental Safety Concerns ............................................................ 4 2.5 Parental Choice for school admission.......................................... 4 3.0 PAST AND ONGOING INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS.. 5 3.1 Safe Routes to School Programme.............................................. 5 3.2 Road Safety Education ................................................................ 5 3.3 Council’s Provision of School Transport ...................................... 6 4.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES................................................................ 6 5.0 STRATEGY ..................................................................................... 7 5.1 Development of School Travel Plan (STP) and Related Measures . 7 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME.............................................. 10 6.1 Setting up a School Travel Plan................................................. 10 Draft 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 There is an increasing problem with the number of children who are taken to and from school by car. Over the last few years, car use on the school run has increased causing traffic congestion, increased pollution,
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid
    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Northwick Park and Kenton
    Buses from Northwick Park and Kenton Harrow Weald Route finder Bannister Playing Fields 182 Bus route Towards Bus stops Uxbridge Road Kenton Lane 114 Mill Hill Broadway DGHK All Saints’ Mews Richmond Gardens HATCH Ruislip CFIL N18 182 Brent Cross a Harrow Weald END Harrow Weald Bus Garage Shopping Centre Courtenay Avenue/ Long Long Elmes Long Elmes Elmes EDGWARE Harrow Weald = Hatch End Headstone Lane H14 183 Golders Green DGHK Hatch End Wealdstone High Road Belmont Circle Canons Park Edgware St. Thomas’ Drive Wealdstone Baptist Church WEALDSTONE Pinner CFIL Locket Road Apex Corner 186 Brent Cross «÷ Headstone Lane Borrowdale Avenue Kenton Lane Shopping Centre Locket Road Locket Road Clifton Avenue Montrose Road Warham Road Harrow Weald High Street Mill Hill Circus 223 Harrow F«IL The Wealdstone Centre Kenton Lane Wembley Queens Avenue GH≤K 483 Ealing Hospital = Harrow & Christchurch Avenue Streatfield Road Wealdstone Palmerston Road Kenmore Avenue Morley Crescent West 114 Harrow a Wealdstone High Road Christchurch Avenue Christchurch Avenue Queensbury Burnt Oak Mill Hill H9 Harrow via Wealdstone DEGH≤KM The Wealdstone Centre Harrow Leisure Centre Kingshill Avenue Kenton Broadway Library H10 Harrow C«ILN Headstone Lane Headstone Drive Grahame Park H14 Hatch End Harrow Crown Court Kenton Lane Quaker’s Course y Headstone Gardens Station Road GREENHILL Hunters Grove Harrow View Harrow View Harrow Civic Centre/Harrow Mosque H18 Harrow ILN Pinner Park Avenue 183 Kenton Lane H19 Harrow via Wealdstone EGHKM Pinner Headstone Gardens Harrow View Kenton Road Kenton Road Kenton Road Kenton Road PINNER Pinner View Kodak Sports Ground Kenton Lane Charlton Road Clifton Road Night buses Harrow View Station Road Kenton Road Kenton Road Kingsbury Bus route Towards Bus stops Pinner Road Safari Cinema Southfield Park Headstone Drive Kenton Park Shrewsbury Avenue Watford H19 Kenton Road Avenue N18 Harrow Weald = continues to K Way North Harrow Harrow View St.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 24 May, 1912. 3789
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 24 MAY, 1912. 3789 were respectively called " The" Central order, direct, and declare, and it is hereby Coroner's District," " The Eastern Coroner's ordered, directed, and declared, that: — , District," and " The Western Coroner's District ": ... - (1) On the occurrence of the next vacancy in the office of Coroner for the existing And whereas a petition has been pre- Western Coroner's District of the county of sented to Hisi Majesty by the County Council Middlesex that district shall be altered by of Middlesex, praying that on the occurrence the transfer from the said Western District of the next vacancy in the office of Coroner for to the existing Central Coroner's District of the existing Western Coroner's District of the the said county of the following parishes: —. said county that district should be altered by Edgware, Great Stanmore, Harrow-on-the- the transfer from the said Western District to Hill, Harrow Weald, Kingsbury, Littla the existing Central Coroner's District of the Stanmore, Pinner, Wealdstone, Wembley; said county of the following parishes:—Edg- (2) On the occurrence of the next vacancy wars, Great Stanmore, Harrow-on-the-Hill, in the office .of Coroner for the ex- Harrow Weald, Kingsbury, Little Stanmore, isting Eastern Coroner's District or the Pinner, Wealdstone, Wembley; and that on existing Central Coroner's District of the occurrence of the next vacancy in the office the county of Middlesex, whichever of Coroner for the existing Eastern Coroner's shall first happen, the existing Eastern District
    [Show full text]
  • 1/01 Whitmore High School, 8 Porlock
    SECTION 1 – MAJOR APPLICATIONS Item: 1/01 WHITMORE HIGH SCHOOL, 8 PORLOCK P/0392/10/SL/MAJ AVENUE, HARROW HA2 0AS Ward HARROW-ON-THE-HILL VARIATION TO CONDITIONS 4, 6, 9, 13, 17, 19, 20 AND 21 OF OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION REF: P/0892/08 DATED 23 MAY 2008 FOR REDEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE NEW TWO AND THREE-STOREY BUILDING ALONG WITH INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SPORTS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS, ACCESS AND PARKING, AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES. Applicant: LONDON BOROUGH OF HARROW Agent: HOWARD FAIRBAIRN MHK Statutory Expiry Date: 21-MAY-10 RECOMMENDATION GRANT permission for the Variation of Conditions as described in the application. REASON The decision to recommend GRANT of planning permission has been taken having regard to the policies and proposals in The London Plan [2008] and the saved policies of Harrow’s Unitary Development Plan [2004], and to all relevant material considerations, to meet the Vision of the Council in maintaining high standards of schools, as detailed in Harrow’s Sustainable Community Strategy [Mar 09], and any comments received in response to publicity and consultation. MAIN CONSIDERATIONS AND POLICIES [The London Plan 2008 & saved policies of The London Borough of Harrow Unitary Development Plan 2004] The London Plan [2008] 3A.24 – Education Facilities London Borough of Harrow Unitary Development Plan [2004]: D4 – The Standard of Design and Layout Harrow’s Sustainable Community Strategy [Mar 09] INFORMATION a) Summary Statutory Return Type: Major Development Other Site Area: 4.2 ha Council Interest: Council-owned property ________________________________________________________________________________________st Planning Committee Wednesday 21 April 2010 1 Item 1/01 : P/0392/10/SL/MAJ continued/ … b) Site Description • Large triangular site is to the north of Porlock Avenue, to the south of houses on Whitmore Road, and to the east of houses on Shaftesbury Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • London in the Thames Catchment
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED London in the Thames catchment Business Case: Flood Risk and the six year investment programme London in the Thames catchment 1. Summary, Headline facts and statistics London’s flood risk Surface Water Rivers/Sea Residential Non Total Residential Non Total residential residential High 59,000 7,000 66,000 11,000 3,000 14,000 Medium 96,000 13,000 109,000 29,000 5,000 34,000 Low 445,000 54,000 499,000 423,000 56,000 485,000 Total at 600,000 74,000 674,000 465,000 65,000 536,000 risk The Six Year Investment Programme The Thames Regional Flood & Coastal Committee decide (RFCC) which projects make up the programme. The allocation of central Government funding to the projects is based on Defra Policy. £180m of Flood Defence Grant in Aid (FD GiA) investment planned in the Thames Estuary to maintain the World Class standard of protection for London from tidal flooding. £77m of FD GiA investment within London in the next six years to directly protect 10,000 properties from tidal flooding £36m of FD GiA investment planned to reduce the risk of river and surface water flooding to 6,800 properties in London At least £25m of contributions are required to unlock all of this investment over the next six years. Levy provides a mechanism for local authorities to pool resources to achieve this. The return on the investment in flood risk management is high. Within Thames the average benefit to cost ratio’s for schemes within the six year investment programme are; Protecting London from tidal flooding: 117:1 Reducing the risk from river flooding: 10:1 Reducing the risk from surface water flooding: 7:1 Levy The levy is used only to part-fund capital projects led by either local authorities or the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]