Terrorism and the Aviation Industry: Insights from the 1929 Warsaw Convention

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Terrorism and the Aviation Industry: Insights from the 1929 Warsaw Convention View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) North Dakota Law Review Volume 78 Number 4 Article 2 2002 Terrorism and the Aviation Industry: Insights from the 1929 Warsaw Convention Speedy Rice Shana Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rice, Speedy and Fitzpatrick, Shana (2002) "Terrorism and the Aviation Industry: Insights from the 1929 Warsaw Convention," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 78 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol78/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TERRORISM AND THE AVIATION INDUSTRY: INSIGHTS FROM THE 1929 WARSAW CONVENTION SPEEDY RICE* SHANA FITZPATRICK** I. INTRODUCTION The terrorist acts of September 11, 2001, (September 11) crippled the domestic and international airline industry and its insurance carriers., Were it not for government intervention in the United States and abroad, air carriers would have been forced to shut down due to the insurance and financial crisis. 2 The insurance industry cancelled policies, and then drastically revised its offerings, exclusions, policy limits, and charges. 3 Because of this and the stated intent of the terrorist organizations to destroy or cripple the economies of the West, the aviation industry now faces a risk level not seen since its earliest days.4 Since its conception, aviation has established itself as one of the most essential means of transportation and has expanded the global financial market. The first strides were made in communication and mail carriage, but as aviation progressed, people and shipments of goods could travel greater distances in relatively short periods of time. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the industry grew at an exponential rate. 5 In a mere five years, passenger carriage increased over 6000%, from 8679 passengers in 1927 to 522,345 passengers in 1931.6 Airplane manufacturing increased as commercial demand soared. In 1930, there were roughly 800 local "air- . Professor, Gonzaga University School of Law; B.A., Furman University, South Carolina, 1976; J.D., California Western School of Law, summa cum laude, 1986. Speedy Rice would like to thank Sasha of Podgorica, Montenegro, for his assistance in finding resources in his beautiful country. Research Assistant, Gonzaga University School of Law, J.D. expected 2003; B.A., University of Alaska, cum laude, 1999. 1. Andrew Ross Sorkin & Simon Romero, A Day of Terror: The Insurers; Reinsurance Companies Wait to Sort Out Cost of Damages, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 12, 2001, at C6 [hereinafter A Day of Terror]. 2. Id.; Keith L. Alexander & Frank Swoboda, Deal Near on Federal Help for Airlines; $15 Billion in Grants, Loan Guarantees, WASH. POST, Sept. 21, 200 1, at A3. 3. Mark Pilling, Industry Seeks Mutual Insurance Deal, AIRLINE BUSINESS, Mar. 1, 2002, at ]I. 4. U.S. Congress, White House Agree on $15 Billion Airline Aid Bill (Sept. 21, 2001), available at http://www.aviationnow.com. 5. George W. Ball, Compulsory Airplane Insurance, 4 J. AIRL. 52, 53 (1933). 6. Id. NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW [VOL. 78:713 taxi" services that utilized over 1000 airports around the country. 7 Individuals and cargo could travel long distances across numerous states and borders. There were as many as thirty-eight companies responsible for interstate air carriage of passengers, and approximately 8000 airplanes supported the aviation industry in the early part of the twentieth century.8 As the aviation industry grew, the concern over liability risks intensi- fied. In 1927, twelve individuals per hundred thousand passengers died in airplane-related accidents, and five years later, the figure dropped slightly to five deaths per hundred thousand passengers. 9 The relatively high number of fatalities concerned industry experts. Accidents were not uncommon, and the rise in air traffic litigation reflected this trend.10 In 1931, Colonial Western Airways received an unfavorable $89,000 judgment when one of its planes crashed and killed fourteen passengers." In a similar suit, Northwest Airways was ordered to pay $60,000 when one if its planes crashed and injured five people.12 Curtis-Wright Flying Service was also found liable for $25,000 in damages for the death of a single passenger in an airplane-related accident.13 These examples demonstrate that juries were awarding substantial damages to injured passengers. While the airline industry was showing signs of becoming financially independent, there were still concerns from industry leaders that liability risks would halt or substantially slow its growth.' 4 A string of well-timed accidents, or a single catastrophic event with numerous causalities, was not unrealistic.15 The resulting damage awards could quite possibly have bankrupted vulnerable airlines and negatively impacted the new aeronautical field. Furthermore, the standard of care in liability litigation was unclear, and varied by country and jurisdiction.16 Shareholders, inves- tors, insurance companies, and governments were apprehensive about finan- cially backing the industry because of its unclear liability and regulatory 7. Fredrick B. Rentschler, Important of Uniform Aeronautic Regulatory Laws of the Aircraft Industry, 2 AIR L. REv. 222, 223 (1931). 8. Id. 9. Id.;Ball, supra note 5,at 53. 10. See Ball, supra note 5, at 53 (discussing the death rate per airline passenger between 1927 and 1931). 11.Id. at 52 (citing Hagymasi v. Colonial W. Airways, 1931 U.S. Av. R. 7 (1931)). 12. Id.(citing Foot v. Northwest Airways, 1931 U.S. Av. R. 66 (1931)). 13. Id.at 53 (citing Williamson v. Curtis-Wright Flying Serv., 51 S.W.2d 1047, 1049 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932)). 14. G.L. Lloyd, Legal and Other Problems Confronting Aviation Insurance Underwriters, 1 J. AIRL. 543, 543 (1930). 15. Ball, supra note 5, at 53-54. 16. Fred D. Fagg, Jr., A Survey of State Aeronautical Legislation, I J. AIR L. 452, 452-53 (1930). 2002] TERRORISM AND THE AVIATION INDUSTRY 715 schemes.17 These concerns echoed internationally.18 Commercial leaders and aviation law experts theorized on possible liability schemes that would balance the needs of the infant industry with concerns for consumer safety and corporate responsibility. 19 As a result of these concerns, liability limits were proposed and adopt- ed in the Warsaw Convention of 1929.20 The international agreement reflected the Warsaw Convention's two goals: (1) to create uniform and predictable regulations governing interstate air carriage that promote com- pensation, and (2) to limit the large-scale liability threatening the young in- dustry. 21 Under this convention, air carriers were able to limit their liability unless they could prove all necessary and reasonable precautions had been taken. 22 However, injured plaintiffs could obtain unlimited recoveries if they could prove an accident was the result of an air carrier's willful misconduct. 23 The economic growth of the twentieth century was inextricably inter- twined with the development of aviation.24 This began after World War I, when the rise in popularity of both private and commercial airline travel started.25 In the seventy years since the Warsaw Convention was ratified, international liability laws and their limits have been severely modified with good justification. 26 Sentiments and the financial strength of the industry changed, and the liability limits imposed by the Warsaw Convention were seen as unfairly deferential to the airline industry. 27 Beginning in The Hague in 1955 and ending in Montreal in 1999, liability limits underwent significant changes, and were finally all but eliminated. 28 17. John R. Bullock, Jr., Note, Aviation-Liability of Owners of Airplanes to Passengers, I AIR L. REV. 407, 407-08 (1930). 18. Andreas F. Lowenfeld & Allan I. Mendelson, The United States and the Warsaw Convention, 80 HARV. L. REV. 497, 499-500 (1967). 19. Id. at 499-501. 20. Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, art. 22, 49 Stat. 3000, 3019 (1934) [hereinafter Warsaw Convention]. 21. Domangue v. E. Airlines, Inc., 722 F.2d 256, 261 (5th Cir. 1984). 22. Warsaw Convention, supra note 20, art. 20. "23. Id. art. 25. 24. See Bullock, supra note 17, at 407 (stating that "aviation is destined to have a profound effect on the commercial life of the [United States]"). 25. Andre Kaftal, Liability and Insurance-The Relation of Air Carrierand Passenger, 5 AtRL. REV. 157, 157 (1932). 26. Pablo Mendes DeLeon & Werner Eyskens, The Montreal Convention: Analysis of Some Aspects of the Attempted Modernization and Consolidation of the Warsaw System, 66 J. AIR L. & COM. 1155, 1156-59 (2001). 27. Id. 28. Tamara A. Marshall, The Warsaw Convention: A Cat with Nine Lives Walks the Plank One More Time, 22 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 337, 339-41 (2002). NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW [VOL. 78:713 On September 11, the terrorist acts were domestic in nature and would not have been subject to liability limitations even under the 1929 Warsaw Convention.2 9 However, the domestic and international effect on the airline industry was equivalent to the worst fears of the promoters of the Warsaw Convention-a series of high-profile air crashes that crippled the industry. 30 It quickly became clear that without government intervention and immediate assistance, including some type of a liability shield, most airlines would not have the foundation to navigate through the months following the attacks. 31 The federal government quickly passed aid packages that included air carrier liability limits. 32 Air carrier liability limits were not a new concept, but have been around since the fledgling stages of the aviation industry.
Recommended publications
  • Early Developments in Commercial Flight
    LESSON 3 Early Developments in Commercial Flight HARLES A. LINDBERGH was one of many Quick Write young men and women learning to fl y C in 1922. He toured as a wing walker and parachutist in a barnstorming act, and then as a pilot. He joined the Charles Lindbergh did not have modern navigation Army in 1924 and graduated fi rst in his fl ying class equipment or another in 1925, but did not receive a regular commission. pilot when he made his He joined the Army Reserve and returned to civilian famous New York-to-Paris fl ight. After reading the life. He then spent a year as a pilot for the new story about his fl ight across airmail service. the Atlantic Ocean, name three things that make In September 1926 he decided to try to fl y across this solo fl ight a historical the Atlantic. He had his eye on the Orteig prize— accomplishment. $25,000 for the fi rst pilot to fl y solo nonstop from New York City to Paris, France. Lindbergh knew that other pilots were after the same prize, so he moved fast. He had $2,000 of his own Learn About savings, plus $13,000 he’d collected from businessmen • why Charles Lindbergh’s in St. Louis. He struck a deal with Ryan Aircraft Inc. contribution to aviation to build him a plane. He wanted a high-wing became famous monoplane with a single air-cooled 220-horsepower • the signifi cance of Wright Whirlwind engine. Amelia Earhart’s transatlantic fl ights Just 60 days after the contract was signed, Ryan • how early developments delivered the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • William Dubilier Walter P
    JANUARY 25 CENTS .)13714`. cience and nventrioti: The City of Tomorrow In This Issue: "Casey" Jones David Belasco William Dubilier Walter P. Chrysler II Stock Stew. Ssivse01.0c. ajn. On every page of this big catalog for 1930 you will find radio Chicae:o3.Wle $ merchandise of unusual interest-priced at the lowest whole- sale quotations. No radio enthusiast or dealer can afford to be without it. The latest radio devices and improvements are illustrated - sets, accessories, parts and kits-at price -saving reductions that spell the buyer's opportunity. Astounding offerings in new, humless, Screen Grid A. C. all -electric and battery oper- ated sets; beautiful and artistic consoles; dynamic speakers of great vol- ume and rich tone; and everything considered standard in accessories, parts and kits. The startling values listed in this Catalog are made possible by our tremendous buying power, low cost of operation and willingness to take a conservative profit. Quick ser- vice, expert cooperation and unusual satisfaction are assured to every customer. Don't fail to get this FREE wonder book. It will save you big money. Mail the Coupon Today! CATALOGFREE, _ MP Mr Ow Stock Store P(ENgtpChicago Salvage pept. 128 Ill. Sos So. StateSt., Chicago, I (free of chargeand postpaid) Kindly send me Book ofRadio Bargains. your new148 -page Name.................................... Address................................ State ......... City .............................. MAI CHICAGO SALVAGE STOCKSTORE c'WORLD'S LARGEST RADIO STORE 509 So.State St. Dept. 128 Chicago, III.. Science and Invention .11ziays outside of things -that's where I was lust twelve short months ago. Ijustdidn'thavethe cash. that was all.No theatres, noparties, no good restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Accidents & Injuries in Air Law: the Clash of the Titans
    ACCIDENTS & INJURIES IN AIR LAW: THE CLASH OF THE TITANS . by Paul Stephen Dempsey INTRODUCTION When the Warsaw Convention of 1929 or the Montreal Convention of 1999 is deemed to apply,1 the court must determine whether recovery is permitted under it. The most critical provision in much personal injury and wrongful death litigation surrounding international commercial aviation is Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, which provides: The carrier shall be liable for damage sustained in the event of the death or wounding of a passenger or any other bodily injury suffered by a passenger, if the accident which . Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey. Readers are encouraged to consult the treatise International Air Carrier Liability: The Montreal Convention of 1999 (McGill 2005) by Paul Stephen Dempsey and Michael Milde, for a broader treatment of the issues discussed herein. Tomlinson Professor of Global Governance in Air & Space Law, and Director of the Institute of Air & Space Law, McGill University. From 1979-2002, Dr. Dempsey was Professor of Law & Director of the Transportation Law Program, University of Denver College of Law. A.B.J. (1972), J.D. (1975), University of Georgia; LL.M. (1978), George Washington University; D.C.L. (1986), McGill University. Admitted to the practice of law in Colorado, Georgia, and the District of Columbia. 1 Pursuant to Article 1, the treaty applies when travel is according to an international itinerary originating and destined to two different contracting States, or from and to a single contracting State
    [Show full text]
  • 1997-2015 Update to FAA Historical Chronology: Civil Aviation and the Federal Government, 1926-1996 (Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1998)
    1997-2015 Update to FAA Historical Chronology: Civil Aviation and the Federal Government, 1926-1996 (Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1998) 1997 January 2, 1997: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an airworthiness directive requiring operators to adopt procedures enabling the flight crew to reestablish control of a Boeing 737 experiencing an uncommanded yaw or roll – the phenomenon believed to have brought down USAir Flight 427 at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1994. Pilots were told to lower the nose of their aircraft, maximize power, and not attempt to maintain assigned altitudes. (See August 22, 1996; January 15, 1997.) January 6, 1997: Illinois Governor Jim Edgar and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley announced a compromise under which the city would reopen Meigs Field and operate the airport for five years. After that, Chicago would be free to close the airport. (See September 30, 1996.) January 6, 1997: FAA announced the appointment of William Albee as aircraft noise ombudsman, a new position mandated by the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-264). (See September 30, 1996; October 28, 1998.) January 7, 1997: Dredging resumed in the search for clues in the TWA Flight 800 crash. The operation had been suspended in mid-December 1996. (See July 17, 1996; May 4, 1997.) January 9, 1997: A Comair Embraer 120 stalled in snowy weather and crashed 18 miles short of Detroit [Michigan] Metropolitan Airport, killing all 29 aboard. (See May 12, 1997; August 27, 1998.) January 14, 1997: In a conference sponsored by the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security and held in Washington, DC, at George Washington University, airline executives called upon the Clinton Administration to privatize key functions of FAA and to install a nonprofit, airline-organized cooperative that would manage security issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mighty Ford Trimotor: Helping to Forge a Global Aviation System on June 11, 1926, the Ford Trimotor Made Its First Flight
    The Mighty Ford Trimotor: Helping to Forge a Global Aviation System On June 11, 1926, the Ford Trimotor made its first flight. The plane, produced by the Ford Motor Company, and designed by William Bushnell Stout, revolutionized air transportation around the world. The Trimotor, one of the first all-metal airplanes, was the first plane built to carry passengers rather the mail. The original 4-AT model seated eight passengers, later increased to twelve, and then thirteen passengers. The plane had three engines, which allowed it to fly higher and faster than other airplanes of the same time period. It could reach speeds up to 150 miles per hour. The plane, affectionately called the Tin Goose or the Flying Washboard, proved exceptionally reliable, able to land safely with just one of its three engines. The nicknames apparently reflected the plane’s attributes. Flying Washboard because of its corrugated external body. Tin Goose, perhaps because many called Ford’s Model T car, the Tin Lizzie. Writer Larry Janoff offers another explanation for the name: “it ‘waddled’ down the runway like a goose and the three loud engines could sound like a goose honking.” Ford, like other automobile companies, entered the aviation business during World War I, building Liberty engines. After the war, it returned to auto manufacturing until 1925. That year, Henry Ford acquired the Stout Metal Airplane Company for an estimated $1 million. In announcing his purchase on August 6, Henry Ford remarked, “The first thing that must be done with aerial navigation is make it fool-proof . What the Ford Motor Company means to do is prove whether commercial flying can be done safely and profitably.” Ford remarked that he had never been in the air and had no desire to fly.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2015 Industry Outlook
    2014 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2015 Industry Outlook General Aviation Manufacturers Association General aviation is defined as all aviation other than military and scheduled commercial airlines. General Aviation: È Includes over 362,000 general aviation aircraft È In the U.S., flies almost 23 million flight worldwide, ranging from two-seat training hours, of which two-thirds are flown for aircraft and utility helicopters to intercontinental business purposes. business jets flying today, of which over 5,000 199,000 aircraft are based in the United States È Flies to more than U.S. public airports, 500 and over 103,000 aircraft are based in Europe. while scheduled airlines serve less than airports. The European general aviation fleet È Supports $219 billion in total economic output can access over 4,200 airports. in the United States and supports 1.1 million total jobs. È Is the primary training ground for most commercial airline pilots. GAMA is an international trade association representing more than 85 of the world’s leading manufacturers of general aviation airplanes and rotorcraft, engines, avionics, components, and related services. GAMA’s members also operate repair stations, fixed-based operations, pilot and maintenance training facilities, and manage fleets of aircraft. For more information, visit GAMA’s Web site at www.GAMA.aero and look for us on Facebook and LinkedIn. 2014 in Review Welcome from GAMA Chairman 2 elcome to GAMA’s 2014 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2015 Industry Outlook, the leading W industry resource on general aviation data. CHAPTER This book contains the most up-to-date information available on general aviation (GA) shipments and billings, GA fleet and flight activity, the pilot community, airports and aeronautical facilities, GA safety information, and international GA data.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Historic Aviation Properties
    NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN Technical information on the National Registerof Historic Places: survey, evaluation, registration, and preservation of cultural resources. U.S. Department of the Interior: - National Park Service Cultural Resources GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING AND DOCUMENTING HISTORIC AV IATION PROPERTIES The mission of the Department of Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibility to tribes. This material is partially based on work conducted under a cooperative agreement with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers and the U.S. Department of the Interior. Photograph caption, cover: Air mail pilot Marvin O'Dell (Louisville to Cleveland route), Bowman Field, Louisville, KY, ca. 1930. Bowman Field Historic District, Jefferson County,KY. (Photographer unknown, courtesy of Kentucky Heritage Council) NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING AND DOCUMENTING HISTORIC AVIATION PROPERTIES BY ANNE MILBROOKE with Patrick Andrus, Jody Cook, and David B. Whipple U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................. 6 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 7 Aviation is More than Airplanes ............................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • The Incredible Complexity of Commercial Aviation
    The Incredible Complexity of Commercial Aviation Suspect all of you have flown on commercial airliners, but, have you ever thought about how complex the modern commercial aviation industry really is? In this course we will discuss how current commercial airplanes are designed, manufactured and sold to and operated by the Airlines worldwide and what role various US Government Agencies, the Federal Aviation (FAA), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Transportation Security Association (TSA) & other agencies outside the USA who play a big part in maintaining aviation safety, worldwide. We will also describe some of the advances in airliner technology over the years that have further contributed to the safety and effectiveness within today’s commercial aviation industry, plus a lot more. We will also discuss a bit about the Boeing 737 MAX issues as well as the effects of COVID 19 on the airline industry OLLI Fall 2020 1 The Incredible Complexity of Commercial Aviation 1. All the amazing numbers and a bit of history 5. Airline operations History, scheduling, fees, labor, fuel, catering, sales , 2. Regulations and Agencies introducing new airplanes. FAA, CAB, NTSB, TSA, ATA, IATA, ICAO, EASA how they have advanced to keep us safe. 6. Aircraft maintenance and Airports ETOPS. – Extended Twin Engine Range FAA regulations, aircraft check levels, component repairs, problem feed back to FAA and manufacturers. 3. Aircraft design and certification Major airports’ traffic, ownership, fees, regulations, Safety records, performance improvements, engines. employment. Basics of aerodynamics of flight, typical commercial flight. Airliners near ready for Service. 7.Air traffic control,737 MAX issues and the effects of Covid19 on the commercial airline industry 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Aviation Policy in Alaska, 1913-2018
    Cover Photos: Caption: Delivery of goods Courtesy: FAA FAA Navaid System Courtesy: https://www.burtonconstruction.net/what-we-do/navaids-faa-systems-facilities Caption: Cold Bay airport, 1972 Courtesy: Wikipedia Caption: NASA DHC-3 Otter Surveying Mountain Glaciers Courtesy: NASA Caption: CAA DC-3 Courtesy: FAA Caption: Indian Mountain Radomes Civil Aviation Policy in Alaska Courtesy: FAA Caption: Kontrashibuna Lake landing Courtesy: NPS Photo/W. Hill 1913-2018 Caption: Loening OL-8A, Alaska Survey Flight, 1929 Courtesy: San Diego Air and Space Museum Archive Caption: Seaplane, Juneau, Alaska Courtesy: Gillfoto, Flickr Caption: FAA Fairchild C-123 at Yakataga, Alaska Courtesy: FAA Caption: A Kodiak Airways plane taking off from Kukak Bay, Alaska, 1964 Courtesy: John Atherton/Wikipedia Commons Caption: Wien Air Alaska aircraft, 1955 Courtesy: Preus Museum/Wikimedia Commons 2020 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., SW Theresa L. Kraus Washington, DC 20591 This book is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Federal Aviation Administration in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or the use thereof. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objectives of the book. The author had complete freedom to interpret events as she saw them, and they are not necessarily the views of the federal government. Table of Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................vii Prologue: The Last Frontier Chapter 1: Aviation Comes to Alaska ....................................................... 3 Air Mail Service ........................................................................ 4 World War I and Its Aftermath .................................................. 6 Alaska’s First Aviation Companies ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Collection
    MS-430, The Richard “Dick” Frazier Aviation Collection Collection Number: MS-430 Title: The Richard “Dick” Frazier Aviation Collection Dates: 1938-1986 Creator: Richard E. “Dick” Frazier Summary/Abstract: Richard E. “Dick” Frazier worked at B.F. Goodrich for most of his career. It is ascertainable that he worked for the Weaver Aircraft Company of Ohio (WACO) at some point in his career as well. His papers include aviation manuals, journals and magazines, newspaper clippings, photographs, illustrations, blueprints, and correspondence. Quantity/Physical Description: 11 Linear Feet Language(s): English Repository: Special Collections and Archives, Paul Laurence Dunbar Library, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435-001, (937) 775-2092 Restrictions on Access: There are no restrictions on accessing material in this collection Restrictions on Use: Copyright restrictions may apply. Unpublished manuscripts are protected by copyright. Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder. Preferred Citation: (Required) (Box Number, Folder Number), (MS-430, The Richard “Dick” Frazier Aviation Collection), Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio Processed by: Jeremy Katz and Jeremy Watkins, March 2011 Arrangement: The collection is arranged into six series: Series I. Aircraft & Aviation Events Series II. Service Journals and Manuals Series III. WACO & B.F. Goodrich Series IV. Military Standard Drawings Series V. Illustrations, Photographs and Negatives Series VI. Aviation Journals, Newspapers, and Magazines Series VII. Hobart Kitchen Machine Instruction Manuals 1 Biographical/Historical Note Richard E. “Dick” Frazier was born to George E. Frazier and Zelda E. Frazier on January 26, 1923 in Wauseon, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review of Civil Aviation 2005 $716 NQRZV $IULFD
    ICJOURNALAO VOLUME 61 NUMBER 5, 2006 Annual Review of Civil Aviation 2005 $716 NQRZV $IULFD 75$,1,1* 96$7 $'9$1&(' $,5 75$)),& 6<67(06 WLW DW ORRN \RX ZD\ :KLFKHYHU 5HVSRQVLEOH IRU DSSUR[LPDWHO\ RI WKH ZRUOG¶V DLUVSDFH $716 SURXGO\ PDQDJHV PRUH WKDQ KDOI D PLOOLRQ DUULYDO DQG GHSDUWXUH PRYHPHQWV HYHU\ \HDU DQG LV PDNLQJ &DSH WR &DLUR VDWHOOLWH FRPPXQLFDWLRQV D UHDOLW\ $716 WUDLQV LQWHUQDWLRQDO DYLDWLRQ SURIHVVLRQDOV PDLQWDLQV ,62 DFFUHGLWDWLRQ DQG VXEVFULEHV WR ,&$2 6WDQGDUGV DQG 5HFRPPHQGHG 3UDFWLFHV 0,5$+ %5$'7 &20081,&$7,216 ICAO Journal The magazine of the International Civil Aviation Organization THE ICAO VOL. 61, NO. 5 SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2006 COUNCIL SPECIAL REPORT • ANNUAL REVIEW OF CIVIL AVIATION President ROBERTO KOBEH GONZÁLEZ ICAO’s review of air transport developments in 2005, as well as traffic 1st Vice-President and financial trends and forecasts until 2008, begins on page 6. L. A. DUPUIS 7 Traffic Results: Total scheduled traffic rose by 6 percent to more 2nd Vice-President than 487 billion tonne-kilometres performed S. RHEE 3rd Vice-President 10 Financial Results: Scheduled airlines posted an operating profit A. SUAZO MORAZÁN despite the high cost of fuel Secretary 15 Trends and Forecasts: Passenger traffic is expected to continue Dr. TAÏEB CHÉRIF to grow strongly during 2006-08 Secretary General 18 Air Carriers: The industry ordered a substantial number of new aircraft valued at some $160 billion Argentina – D. O. Valente Australia – S. Clegg 20 General Aviation: Aeroplane manufacturers enjoyed a banner year, Austria – S. Gehrer producing over 3,500 units worldwide Brazil – P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aviation Law Review
    The AviationThe Law Review Aviation Law Review Third Edition Editor Sean Gates Law Business Research The Aviation Law Review The Aviation Law Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Aviation Law Review - Edition 3 (published in July 2015 – editor Sean Gates) For further information please email [email protected] The Aviation Law Review Third Edition Editor Sean Gates Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGERS Katherine Jablonowska, Thomas Lee, Felicity Bown ACCOUNT MANAGER Joel Woods PUBLISHING MANAGER Lucy Brewer MARKETING ASSISTANT Rebecca Mogridge EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Shani Bans HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Robbie Kelly SUBEDITOR Janina Godowska MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2015 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2015, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning
    [Show full text]