DOCSLIB.ORG

Marwa Maziad Final Dissertation Submission June 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marwa Maziad Final Dissertation Submission June 14 Middle East Militaries: In and Out of Politics and Economies due to External Threat Perceptions A Dynamic Regional Order Approach to Civil–military Relations: Comparative Cases of Turkey, Egypt, and Israel Marwa Maziad A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2019 Reading Committee: Joel Migdal, Co-chair Reşat Kasaba, Co-chair Dan Chirot Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program in Near and Middle Eastern Studies ©Copyright 2019 Marwa Maziad University of Washington Abstract Middle East Militaries: In and Out of Politics and Economies due to External Threat Perceptions A Dynamic Regional Order Approach to Civil–military Relations: Comparative Cases of Turkey, Egypt, and Israel Marwa Maziad Co-Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Joel Migdal Jackson School of International Studies Co-Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Reşat Kasaba Jackson School of International Studies There are many ways for the military to intervene in politics, whether through a direct governing role or monopolizing the national security apparatus. Another much-debated means for military intervention in politics is to play a role in a country’s economy. Turkey, Egypt, and Israel are three Middle East cases whose militaries have exhibited various economic roles since the 1950s. Subsequent oscillations between economic civilianization and remilitarization have followed. The three cases, however, have shared comparative inception stories of military economic roles, albeit with contrasting configurations of how these military economic activities manifested over time. The militaries’ involvement in the economic realm includes (a) high military budget relative to the civilian state budget and the country’s GDP (Israel); (b) military-run defense industries or the militarization of various economic sectors, such as high-tech, through an advanced military-industrial-complex (Israel and Turkey); and (c) income-generating military- owned enterprises for the purpose of military self-sufficiency. These military-run companies make up for relatively smaller official defense budgets (Egypt). The military-owned holdings can serve as officer pension funds that invest in the civilian economy to directly redistribute the wealth to the retired soldiers (Turkey). Or they include swathes of land controlled by the armed forces that are later sold for income-generation after being vacated (Israel and Egypt). Why did these three seemingly different cases, in terms of their histories, political structures, and societies, converge—one way or another— on a similarly high military involvement in the economic realm of their respective countries? I argue that these military economic roles are co-constituted from within a high threat perception dynamic regional order. In other words, the three militaries play an economic role to maintain themselves as the three strongest militaries in the Middle East. The dynamic regional order approach to understanding economic civil–military relations in the Middle East allows two key observations. First, the countries actually influenced each other’s economic civil–military relations trajectories by virtue of being rival adjacent neighbors, in a high-threat perception environment. This circumstance of regional rivalry and competitive national projects pushed for an arms race in their early years of state formation, which in turn militarized their respective economies over the decades. Second, the countries have consequently been emulating one another from a pool of “best practices,” or at least normalized global civil– military relations practices of military economic roles. I argue that none of these countries’ military economic roles can be understood as an isolated case. The economic role of the military is, thus, a product of the needs of the three countries alike to allocate enough economic resources for their respective militaries in order to enforce sufficient deterrence in a high threat perceptions regional order. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Militaries in Economies .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Research Question ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Argument ................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Background to the Research Problem ........................................................................................... 13 1.5 Scope of the Study ................................................................................................................................. 31 1.6 SigniFicance of the Study ..................................................................................................................... 36 1.7 Methods and Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 45 1.8 The Dissertation Chapters ................................................................................................................. 51 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Conceptual Framework ................................................. 53 2.1 Conditions Under Which Militaries Intervene in Politics ........................................................ 54 General Civil–Military Relations Theories ........................................................................................................ 54 Clausewitz: War is politics by other means and civilian control over the military is a necessity. .......... 54 Laswell’s Garrison State: When Technically-Advanced Officers Govern and Rule ........................................ 55 The 1950s and 1960s: Huntington, Janowitz, and Finer—Militaries as Modernization Agents .............. 55 Not All Kinds of “Civilian Control” Were Created Equal: Subjective and Objective Civilian Control ..... 59 What is Military Corporateness? ......................................................................................................................................... 60 1970s: Comparative Approaches to Civil–Military Relations ................................................................................. 69 The 1990s and 2000s: Desch, Schiff, Kamrava, Croissant and Kuehn, Sarigil .................................................. 75 Combining Views ........................................................................................................................................................................ 83 Theories on Civil Military Relations in Turkey, Egypt, and Israel ........................................................... 85 i Civil–Military Relations in Turkey ...................................................................................................................................... 86 Civil–Military Relations in Egypt ......................................................................................................................................... 95 Civil–Military Relations in Israel ....................................................................................................................................... 105 2.2 DeFense Economics ............................................................................................................................. 109 Economic Sketch of Turkey ................................................................................................................................... 111 Economic Sketch of Egypt ...................................................................................................................................... 120 Economic Sketch of Israel ....................................................................................................................................... 124 2.3 A Theoretical Framework Comparing and Contrasting Turkey, Egypt, and Israel from within a Middle East Dynamic Regional Order ................................................................................ 126 Military in State and in Society ............................................................................................................................. 126 Militaries in a Dynamic Regional Order ........................................................................................................... 127 2.4 Applying the Dynamic Regional Order Approach .................................................................... 128 2.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 129 Chapter 3 The Turkish Armed Forces: An Economic Power in the Political Sphere 131 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 131 3.2 Background: The Turkish Military and Party Politics ............................................................ 138 The Civilian Government’s role in “Segmentalizing” the Officer Corps along economic lines in the 1950s: .....................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Mercenaries and the State: How the hybridisation of the armed forces is changing the face of national security Caroline Varin A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2012 ii Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of <83,157> words. iii Abstract The military has been a symbol of nationhood and state control for the past two hundred years. As representatives of a society’s cultural values and political ambitions, the armed forces have traditionally been held within the confines of the modern state. Today, however, soldiers are expected to operate in the shadows of conflicts, drawing little attention to themselves and to their actions; they are physically and emotionally secluded from a civilian population whose governments, especially in the ‘West’, are proceeding to an unprecedented wave of demilitarisation and military budget cuts.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil-Military Relations: a Comparative Analysis of the Role of the Military in the Political Transformation of Post-War Turkey and Greece: 1980-1995
    CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE MILITARY IN THE POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION OF POST-WAR TURKEY AND GREECE: 1980-1995 Dr. Gerassimos Karabelias Final Report submitted to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in June 1998 1 ABSTRACT This report attempts to determine the evolution of civil-military relations in Turkey and Greece during the 1980-1995 period through an examination of the role of the military in the political transformation of both countries. Since the mid-1970s and especially after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the struggle for spreading the winds of democracy around the globe has been the goal of all western states and particularly the United States of America. However, taking into consideration the volatility in the Balkans and in Central Asia, the military institution of Turkey and Greece which gave the impression that it withdrew in the barracks after their last intervention in 1980-83 and 1967-74 respectively, could easily be forced or even tempted to assume a greater responsibility in the conduct of each country’s domestic and foreign affairs. Only through a better understanding of its role during the 1980-95 period, we would be able to determine the feasibility of such scenarios. Using a multi-factorial model as a protection from the short- sighted results which the majority of mono-factorial approaches produce, this report starts with the analysis of the distinct role which the Armed Forces of each country have had in the historical evolution of their respective civil-military relations up to 1980 (Part One of Chapters Two and Three).
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Nation: a Study of the Emergence and Development of Nation and Nationalism in Thailand
    THE KING’S NATION: A STUDY OF THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF NATION AND NATIONALISM IN THAILAND Andreas Sturm Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London (London School of Economics and Political Science) 2006 UMI Number: U215429 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U215429 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis, submitted in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and entitled ‘The King’s Nation: A Study of the Emergence and Development of Nation and Nationalism in Thailand’, represents my own work and has not been previously submitted to this or any other institution for any degree, diploma or other qualification. Andreas Sturm 2 VV Abstract This thesis presents an overview over the history of the concepts ofnation and nationalism in Thailand. Based on the ethno-symbolist approach to the study of nationalism, this thesis proposes to see the Thai nation as a result of a long process, reflecting the three-phases-model (ethnie , pre-modem and modem nation) for the potential development of a nation as outlined by Anthony Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Crimean War (1853-1856)
    The Ottoman Crimean War (1853-1856) By Candan Badem BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2010 CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Maps vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Geographical Names xi A Note on Transliteration and Dates xiii Acknowledgements xv I. Introduction and Review of the Sources 1 Introduction 1 Ottoman and Turkish Sources 5 Turkish Official Military History 19 Dissertations and Theses in Turkish 22 Sources in Russian 25 Sources in Other Languages 34 II. The Origins of the War 46 Overview of the Ottoman Empire on the Eve of the War 46 Relations with Britain 58 Russia between Expansionism and Legitimism 60 Dispute over the Holy Places 64 Positions of France, Austria and Other States 65 The "Sick Man of Europe" 68 The Mission of Prince Menshikov 71 The Vienna Note and the "Turkish Ultimatum" 82 European and Ottoman Public Opinion before the War ... 87 III. Battles and Diplomacy during the War 99 The Declaration of War 99 The Danubian Front in 1853 101 The Battle of Sinop and European Public Opinion 109 The Caucasian Front in 1853 143 Relations with Imam Shamil and the Circassians in 1853 ... 149 The Battle of S.ekvetil 154 The Battles of Ahisha, Bayindir and Basgedikler 156 The Danubian Front in 1854 and the Declaration of War by France and Britain 177 VI CONTENTS The Caucasian Front in 1854-1855 190 Relations with Shamil and the Circassians in 1854-1855 195 The Campaign of Summer 1854 and the Battle of Kiirekdere 212 The Siege and Fall of Kars and Omer Pasha's Caucasian Campaign in 1855 238 Battles in the Crimea and the Siege of Sevastopol 268 The End of the War and the Treaty of Paris 285 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Gaza War Assessment: the New Face of Conflict
    2014 Gaza War Assessment: The New Face of Conflict A report by the JINSA-commissioned Gaza Conflict Task Force March 2015 — Task Force Members, Advisors, and JINSA Staff — Task Force Members* General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.), Task Force Chair Former Deputy Commander of United States European Command Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV, USA (ret.) Former Commander, U.S. Army North Lieutenant General Richard Natonski, USMC (ret.) Former Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Command Major General Rick Devereaux, USAF (ret.) Former Director of Operational Planning, Policy, and Strategy - Headquarters Air Force Major General Mike Jones, USA (ret.) Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Central Command * Previous organizational affiliation shown for identification purposes only; no endorsement by the organization implied. Advisors Professor Eliot Cohen Professor of Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Lieutenant Colonel Geoffrey Corn, USA (ret.) Presidential Research Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law, Houston JINSA Staff Dr. Michael Makovsky Chief Executive Officer Dr. Benjamin Runkle Director of Programs Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director, Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy Maayan Roitfarb Programs Associate Ashton Kunkle Gemunder Center Research Assistant . — Table of Contents — 2014 GAZA WAR ASSESSMENT: Executive Summary I. Introduction 7 II. Overview of 2014 Gaza War 8 A. Background B. Causes of Conflict C. Strategies and Concepts of Operations D. Summary of Events
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew J. Bacevich
    ANDREW J. BACEVICH Department of International Relations Boston University 154 Bay State Road Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Telephone (617) 358-0194 email: [email protected] CURRENT POSITION Boston University Professor of History and International Relations EDUCATION Princeton University, Ph.D. American Diplomatic History, 1982 Princeton University, M.A. American History, 1977 United States Military Academy, West Point, B.S., 1969 FELLOWSHIPS The American Academy in Berlin Berlin Prize Fellow, 2004 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Visiting Fellow of Strategic Studies, 1992-1993 The John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University National Security Fellow, 1987-1988 Council on Foreign Relations, New York International Affairs Fellow, 1984-1985 PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS Boston University Director, Center for International Relations, 1998-2005 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer; Executive Director, Foreign Policy Institute, 1993-1998 School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer, Department of Political Science, 1995-1997 United States Military Academy, West Point Assistant Professor, Department of History, 1977-1980 1 PUBLICATIONS Books and Monographs Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: Metropolitan Books (2010); audio edition (2010). The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism. New York: Metropolitan Books (2008); audio edition (2008); Chinese and German editions (2009); Polish edition (2010); Japanese, Korean, and Turkish editions (forthcoming). The Long War: A New History of U. S. National Security Policy since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press (2007). (editor). The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. New York: Oxford University Press (2005); History Book Club selection; 2005 Lannan Literary Award for an Especially Notable Book; Chinese edition (2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Resources Trap: Private Investment Without Public
    The Natural Resources Trap Private Investment without Public Commitment edited by William Hogan and Federico Sturzenegger The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any elec- tronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about special quantity discounts, please e-mail special_sales@mitpress .mit.edu This book was set in Palatino on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The natural resources trap : private investment without public commitment / edited by William Hogan and Federico Sturzenegger. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01379-6 (hbk. : alk. paper) 1. Natural resources—Government policy. 2. Natural resources—Law and legislation. 3. Investments, Foreign. 4. Public—private sector cooperation. I. Hogan, William W. II. Sturzenegger, Federico. HC85.N36 2010 333.7—dc22 2009029574 10987654321 Index Adelman, Morris A., 18, 429, 461n28 Venezuela and, 415, 437–438, 442–444, Adler, Michael, 97 448–452, 455–458, 463n45 Agency issues Arellano, Cristina, 77 contract theory, 63–65 Argentina, xii, 7, 34, 36, 338, 368, 416 GRAB function and, 199, 220 Administrative Emergency Law and, 387 oil production contracts and, 229–231, Alsogaray, Alvaro, and, 389–390 235, 237–238,
    [Show full text]
  • International Commissions of Inquiry and Palestine: Overview and Impact
    Al-Haq Center for Applied International Law INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY AND PALESTINE: OVERVIEW AND IMPACT STUDY ANALYSIS Al-Haq Center for Applied International Law © 2016 Al-Haq Center for Applied International Law 33 Main Street - Latin Patriarchate Building , 3rd Floor P.O.Box: 1413 - Ramallah - West Bank - Palestine Tel: + 972 (0) 2 2954646/7/9 Fax: + 972 (0) 2 2985858 www.alhaq.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 1. Commissions Of Inquiry And Palestine – Origin And Framework .......................... 5 1.1 The longstanding lack of accountability for violations of international law in the context of Author: Alessandro Tonutti - PhD Student at Leiden University and Scuola Palestine and the need for international independent investigations. ............................................. 5 Superiore Sant’Anna (Pisa). 1.2 Commissions of Inquiry/Fact-Finding Missions as instruments under international law. ............ 7 ISBN: 978-9950-327-50-4 1.3 Defining the object of the study: commissions of inquiry and fact-finding missions established with Design Hamza Dado regard to the OPT (2000 - 2015). .................................................................................................... 11 Commissioned By: : Al-Haq Center for Applied International Law - © All Rights Reserved 2. Comparative thematic analysis of comissions of inquiry established in the opt (2000-2015) ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Overview of the work of the commissions of inquiry in the opt (2000-2015) ........... 14 2.2 A ‘thematic comparative analysis’ of the different commissions of inquiry ............. 36 Alessandro Tonutti – Short Bio Alessandro Tonutti obtained a Master Degree in Law at Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome in 2010 and a LL.M in Public International Law at Leiden University in 2011. He is currently writing his PhD on 3.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Potential for Improved Conflict Resolution
    ON THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVED CONFLICT RESOLUTION THROUGH ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN PALESTINE An Undergraduate Research Scholars Thesis by HUNTER HAMPTON Submitted to Honors and Undergraduate Research Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the designation as an UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH SCHOLAR Approved by Research Advisor: Dr. Ashley Passmore May 2015 Major: International Studies Economics TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ 2 NOMENCLATURE ..................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5 II. METHODS ......................................................................................................... 12 III. RESULTS ........................................................................................................... 16 IV. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 31 a. Israel .............................................................................................................. 31 b. Palestine .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 8 Issue 2 Issue 2 - A Symposium on Article 14 Unemployment Insurance 2-1955 Book Reviews Lloyd P. Stryker (reviewer) Howard J. Graham (reviewer) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Commercial Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Lloyd P. Stryker (reviewer) and Howard J. Graham (reviewer), Book Reviews, 8 Vanderbilt Law Review 525 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol8/iss2/14 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS THE AMERICAN LAWYER By Albert P. Blaustein and Charles 0. Porter, with Charles T. Duncan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1954. Pp. xiii, 360. $5.50. It is a refreshing thing to come across a book like that written by Albert P. Blaustein and Charles 0. Porter, with Charles T. Duncan, and the University of Chicago Press should be complimented for pub- lishing so valuable a volume. It might have been a very" dull and tedious book but it is not. Indeed, it is a singularly able performance. In it will be found a simple, well written and scholarly account of the legal profession. I have been delighted with its clarity, its insight and its good style. A survey by the authors of this book was espoused by the Carnegie Foundation and the American Bar Association at a cost of a quarter of a million dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Civil Military Relations in Complex Conflicts: Success And
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL The Importance of Civil Military Relations in Complex Conflicts: Success and Failure in the Border States, Civil War Kentucky and Missouri, 1860-62. Being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of PhD, Department of Politics and International Studies In the University of Hull By Carl William Piper, BA (Lancs),MA June, 2011 Contents Introduction, p.1 Literary Review, p.60 The Border States in the Secession Crisis, p115 Case Study 1: Missouri April to September, 1861, p.160 Case Study 2: Kentucky April to September, 1861, p.212 Case Study 3: Forts Henry and Donelson, p.263 Case Study 4: The Perryville Campaign June to November, 1862, p.319 Conclusion, p.377 Bibliography, p.418 Introduction Despite taking place in the mid-nineteenth century the U.S. Civil War still offers numerous crucial insights into modern armed conflicts. A current or future federation or new ‘nation’ may face fundamental political differences, even irreconcilable difficulties, which can only be settled by force. In future states will inevitably face both separatist issues and polarised argument over the political development of their nation. It is probable that a civil war may again occur where the world may watch and consider forms of intervention, including military force, but be unwilling to do so decisively. This type of Civil War therefore remains historically significant, offering lessons for approaching the problems of strategy in a politically complex environment. Equally it offers insights into civil-military relations in highly complex conflicts where loyalties are not always clear. Success and ultimate triumph in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Egyptian Military in Politics and the Economy: Recent History and Current Transition Status
    CMI INSIGHT October 2013 No 2 The Egyptian military in politics and the economy: Recent history and current transition status The Egyptian military has been playing a decisive role in national politics since the eruption of the 2011 uprisings. The Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) governed the country from February 2011 until June 2012. They worked closely with the elected civilian President Morsi of the Muslim Brothers. In June 2013, supported by mass protests and in collaboration with youth movements, the military overthrew president Morsi. The future of the democratic transition in Egypt is closely linked to General Abd al- Fattah al-Sisi, the current Minister of Defence. He was instrumental in forming the current transitional government, and hold key roles in drafting the new constitution and organizing subsequent elections. This CMI Insight explores recent historical episodes that inform the extensive political leverage that the military enjoys in Egyptian politics. ARMY, POLITICS, AND BUSINESS (1980- 2011) Dr. Zeinab Abul-Magd The militarisation of the Egyptian state and Guest researcher economy began six decades ago. In 1952, a military coup led by a group of young Farouk, and kicked out the British. This officers brought down the monarch, King the charismatic and popular Gamal Abd coup installed the first military president, al-Nasser (1954-1970), who formed an Egyptian military in Tahrir Square. Photo: Nefissa administrativeArab socialist regimeand economic in which positions. military1 Naguib. officers occupied the most important Mubarak in the course of thirty years, passed Two other military presidents succeeded after Egypt signed the Camp David peace attemptedNasser: Anwar to “demilitarise” Sadat (1970-1981) the Egyptian and through three different phases.
    [Show full text]