DOCSLIB.ORG

Cory Riverside Energy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cory Riverside Energy Riverside Energy Park The Project and its Benefits Report VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 07 7.2 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Project and its Benefits Report Riverside Energy Park Executive Summary Project and its Benefits Report – Executive Summary Riverside Energy Park Contents 1 The Project and its Benefits Report Executive Summary ............................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Overview ............................................................................................... 2 The Policy Driven Need for Major Energy Infrastructure ....................... 3 Positive Carbon Outcomes ................................................................... 4 Sustainable Waste Management .......................................................... 7 Optimised Site and Design .................................................................. 14 Conclusion .......................................................................................... 15 Figures Figure 1: The Project and its Benefits ......................................................................... 3 Figure 2: Figure 7.1 from CCC 2018 Report ............................................................. 10 Figure 3: Landfill facilities commonly used to dispose of London’s waste ............... 11 Figure 4: Collective capture rates in major European Cities ..................................... 13 Tables Table 1: Policies of Chapter 9, draft London Plan, Sustainable Infrastructure .......... 16 Page i Project and its Benefits Report – Executive Summary Riverside Energy Park 1 The Project and its Benefits Report Executive Summary Introduction Cory Environmental Holdings Limited (trading as Cory Riverside Energy) (‘the Applicant’ or ‘Cory’)) is applying to the Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008 for powers to construct, operate and maintain an integrated Energy Park, to be known as Riverside Energy Park (REP). The principal elements of REP comprise complementary energy generating development (with energy from waste being the largest component) and an associated Electrical Connection (together referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’). REP is proposed on land immediately adjacent to Cory’s existing Riverside Resource Recovery Facility (RRRF) located at Belvedere within the London Borough of Bexley and would complement the operation of the existing facility as well as making greater use of existing river-based infrastructure in London. It would comprise an integrated range of technologies including: energy from waste (or waste energy recovery), an anaerobic digestion facility for food and green waste, solar panels and battery storage. Additionally, REP would include on site infrastructure to provide the potential for heat to be supplied to local housing and businesses. Key REP Policy Themes Key policy themes at the core of REP and the DCO submission are: Riverside Energy Park: Key REP Policy Themes Generating reliable low carbon/renewable energy for London and UK Bridging the infrastructure gap in London and the South East Replacing landfill - not recycling – and moving waste up the Waste Hierarchy Dealing with London’s residual waste problem - in London – and achieving greater net self-sufficiency for London Maximising movement of freight by river in London and minimising traffic congestion Tackling air quality and delivering carbon positive outcomes Bringing forward private investment – and avoiding the need for public subsidy Page 1 Project and its Benefits Report – Executive Summary Riverside Energy Park Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Cory has a long history and deep connection with London stretching back to 1896. Cory has invested heavily in London’s recycling, energy generation and river logistics infrastructure. In addition to its commercial customers, Cory is a trusted partner for a number of local authorities in London (serving a combined population of c.1.5 million people) and operates essential infrastructure which London relies heavily upon on a day to day basis. Cory’s shareholders also have a proven track record of investing in and delivering London’s essential ‘big ticket’ infrastructural needs (for example, the Thames Tideway Tunnel project) (see the Funding Statement - Document Reference 4.2). Accordingly, if the DCO is granted, the Secretary of State can be confident that the Proposed Development would likely be constructed and successfully delivered for London. REP would create approximately 85 new jobs in addition to the 365 people already employed by Cory in London. Cory is proud of its work in the community in London including with local schools, community groups and career apprenticeship schemes. Overview As demonstrated in Figure 1, REP is an efficient major energy project, taking non-recyclable waste as its feedstock to recover renewable/low carbon energy and secondary materials. The London Waste Strategy Assessment, the Applicant’s policy based assessment of REP against the adopted and draft London Plans, and independent market based research prepared by Tolvik Consulting Ltd, demonstrate the extent of need for new residual waste treatment facilities such as REP. Battery storage and district heating opportunities provide additional benefits, supplementing the diversity, resilience, and security of London’s energy supply sources. Major energy generating stations, such as REP, utilising proven treatment technology, are well established as a key component of sustainable communities. Beyond diverting waste from landfill and meeting climate change challenges, such facilities deliver essential energy infrastructure and societal, as well as economic and environmental benefits. Page 2 Project and its Benefits Report – Executive Summary Riverside Energy Park Figure 1: The Project and its Benefits The National Policy Statements EN-1 and EN-3 are clear in their objectives to achieve climate change driven priorities of: positive carbon outcomes and renewable/low carbon energy; sustainable waste management; and optimised design. REP responds directly to the outcomes sought through the National Policy Statements EN-1 and EN-3 and the London Plan (both the adopted Plan and draft Plan). It is a market led, industry funded project, requiring no form of government subsidy, which will make a significant contribution to delivering the urgent and substantial need for new energy, and waste disposal, infrastructure both in London and the UK. The Policy Driven Need for Major Energy Infrastructure The National Policy Statements EN-1 and EN-3 establish an urgent and substantial need for new energy generation infrastructure, making clear the expectation that the industry will provide this capacity through private led investment such as REP. Alongside the drive for new energy generation is the desire for it to be renewable or low carbon, in order to meet climate change targets. REP meets these policy objectives, delivering new energy capacity through a renewable/low carbon supply, with no public funding support or subsidy. Locally, policy of the London Plan is consistent with the National Policy Statements in seeking to: reduce London’s carbon emissions; gain decentralised energy supply; and divert waste away from landfill, through new treatment capacity that will enable London to be self-sufficient (by 2026). Page 3 Project and its Benefits Report – Executive Summary Riverside Energy Park Responding directly to the National Policy Statements and London Plan, REP: is an energy recovery facility that achieves a positive carbon outcome, not least through the recovery of renewable/low carbon electricity from otherwise useless residual waste and has good potential to also contribute to heat demand; is at the right level of the waste hierarchy and constitutes sustainable waste management capacity, taking waste away from landfill, moving it up the waste hierarchy and providing for the reuse of metals and ash as construction aggregates (reducing reliance on the quarrying of primary aggregates); and delivers good design, not least through incorporating a range of energy recovery and storage technologies, being CHP Enabled, and incorporating river freight as part of the multi-modal transport network thereby significantly reducing the number of trucks on London streets. The National Policy Statements establish the relevant tests against which to demonstrate the need case, for both energy supply and waste management. REP delivers the priority environmental, economic and societal benefits sought by the National Policy Statements - at no cost to the tax payer. Therefore, pursuant to section 104 of the Planning Act 2008, the Proposed Development should be consented. Positive Carbon Outcomes Recovering Renewable/Low Carbon Energy from waste disposal Above all, REP is a major energy infrastructure project recovering energy from waste and providing a reliable heat source for a future distribution network. The energy recovered through the Energy Recovery Facility (ERF) is confirmed as renewable/low carbon, with that recovered through the Anaerobic Digestion Facility and Solar Photovoltaic Panels confirmed as wholly renewable. The REP development will create reliable low/carbon renewable electricity to power the equivalent of c.140,000 homes per annum across London. The feedstock, or fuel,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement
    Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 07 7. 3 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Harry’s Yard, 176-178 Newhall St, Birmingham, B3 1SJ T: +44 (0)121 454 4171 E:[email protected] Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Contents Summary 3.4 Site Analysis 3.4.1 REP Site 1.0 Introduction 3.4.2 Sun Path Analysis 1.1 Introduction 3.4.3 Access 1.1.1 Cory Riverside Energy Holdings Limited 3.4.4 Site Opportunities and Constraints 1.1.2 Riverside Resource Recovery Facility 1.2 Purpose of the Design and Access Statement 4.0 Design Process 4.1 Overview of the Design Process to date 2.0 The Proposed Development 4.2 Good Design Principles 2.1 Overview 2.2 Key Components of the Proposed Development 5.0 Illustrative Masterplan 2.2.1 The Energy Recovery Facility 5.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Anaerobic Digestion Facility 5.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposals 2.2.3 Solar Photovoltaic Panels 5.2.1 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 1 - North to South - Stack South 2.2.4 Battery Storage 5.2.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 2 - North to South - Stack North 2.2.5 Other Elements 5.2.3 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 3 - East to West - Stack West 3.0 Site Overview 5.2.4 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 4 - East to West - Stack East
    [Show full text]
  • NLWA Annual Report 2020/21
    Annual Report 2020-21 1. Background 1.1 The Annual Report for the Authority is produced each year for the Annual General Meeting (AGM) in June. The report uses waste tonnage data which is still subject to final validation by the national waste data system, WasteDataFlow, so may be subject to further minor changes. Because this data validation is not completed until September each year the Authority usually also produces its annual Waste Strategy Monitoring Report, which includes the validated numbers, in December each year. 1.2 NLWA’s largest ever project – the North London Heat and Power Project, (NLHPP) continued as a key focus throughout the year. The NLHPP is the Authority’s project to replace the existing energy-from-waste facility at the Edmonton EcoPark with a new energy-recovery-facility (ERF) and to provide associated new assets which support recycling. Other recycling and waste prevention activities to manage and reduce the volume of residual waste are set out in the Residual Waste Reduction Plan 2020-2022 and were also implemented during the year. The remaining activities to deliver the 2004-2020 North London Joint Waste Strategy were also delivered. All of the targets within the joint waste strategy have now been achieved, with the exception of reaching a recycling rate of 50%. NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY / ANNUAL REPORT 2020-2021 2 2. Highlights of 2020/21 2.1 It was a year of strong progress despite the COVID-19 pandemic. 2.2.2 In terms of the amount of local authority collected residua The pandemic disrupted operational services and the Authority’s l waste disposed of by the Authority, (both from households waste prevention work.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2018 2 Sustainability Report 2018 Cory Riverside Energy
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 2 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY CONTENTS Report highlights 3 About Cory Riverside Energy 5 Chair’s statement 10 CEO’s statement 11 Scope of the report 12 Governance and Materiality 14 Our sustainable business strategy 17 Our sustainability performance 21 Making london a more sustainable city 22 Our sustainability performance against priority areas 30 Our performance scorecard and future plans 40 Appendix 49 Report highlights In 2018, we established our sustainable business strategy to help drive performance across our business in line with five key priority areas aimed at: • supporting London’s circular economy by processing recyclable waste, enabling resource recovery from non-recyclable residual waste, and creating by-products for use in construction; • reducing the level of waste sent to landfill and exported abroad; and • partnering to increase awareness of recycling, the circular economy and the role of the River Thames for freight transportation. 4 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Our sustainable business strategy seeks to improve BUSINESS INTEGRITY our operations to support London’s aims of becoming We have instigated a health and safety culture change programme a sustainable city, and support the nine United to reduce the incidents and accidents we have in our operations. Nations Sustainable Development Goals that we have We have increased awareness and understanding of modern identified as having the greatest ability to impact. We slavery and anti-bribery and corruption amongst employees and invite you to explore our 2018 sustainability report for our suppliers, through enhanced policies and procedures. a greater insight into Cory’s key priorities, which are At our energy from waste facility, we have remained fully compliant summarised below.
    [Show full text]
  • EPSM2009-1145 WYG Environment Transport
    Ref Ecologist Name & Address Applicants Name & Address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Philip Boniface, Condover Quarry, Condover, EPSM2009-1145 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Shrewsbuy, SY5 7AR. Condover Quarry Condover Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 7AR Willenhall WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Ian Merrill, Severn Trent Water, PO Box 51, Sewage EPSM2009-1169 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Raynesway, Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 7JA Treatment Works Off Anson Road Willenhall West Midlands WS2 0DH Halcrow Group Ltd, Griffin House, 135 High Street, Mr J Beechey, South East Water, Rochfort Road, Kippings Cross to EPSM2009-1174 Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 1DQ Snodland, Kent, ME6 5AH Pembury Kent The National Trust, Mr Stuart Crow, Tattershall, Tattersfield EPSM2009-1181 Lincolnshire, LN4 4LR Castle Sleaford Tattersfield Lincolnshire LN4 4LR InterRoute, Ms Emma Fisher, InterRoute Area 2, 910 Highways Authority, InterRoute Ms A Roberts, Hempton Court, Aztec West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 InterRoute Area 2, 910 Hempton Court, Aztec Summerlands M4 Marker Post EPSM2009-1184 4SR. West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SR. Access Bridge 148/8 Wiltshire Mr James Mitchell, Wessex Water, Claverton Down, Bath, Mr Steve Lanzon, Wessex Water, Claverton Land to the West EPSM2009-1185 BA2 7WW Down, Bath, BA2 7WW Swallet Gate Dauntsey of Swallet Gate Dauntsey Wiltshire Theakston Estates Mr Martin Corney, Elston Hall, Windlestone
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-05-26 XR Rebuttal of NLWA Claims
    STATEMENT 26 MAY 2020 of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Media contact: +44 7710 269195 Hackney, Haringey, Islington [email protected] & Waltham Forest, together with Extinction Rebellion London TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT incineration The North London Waste Authority (NLWA) has responded to calls for a pause and review of its North London Heat and Power Project (NLHPP)—which includes plans to construct a new incinerator in Edmonton— with statements that include some questionable claims. These statements appear in a letter signed by NLWA chair Cllr Clyde Loakes and dated 21 April 2020, and in a Hackney Citizen article of 11 March 2020, which quotes Hackney Cllr Jon Burke.1 They reveal that the NLWA still is not taking recycling or climate breakdown seriously. In this document, Extinction Rebellion (XR) corrects the record with the intention of convincing North London councillors to pause and review the NLHPP so that the seven boroughs that constitute the NLWA may be free to pursue more sustainable waste management options and help London meet its circular economy policy objectives. The current incinerator is operational until 2027, so there is time for a rethink, as long as procurement and preparatory works are put on hold. This rebuttal is meant as a complement to a letter that XR sent to all North London councillors on 11 March 2020. That letter provides a thoroughly sourced rundown of the environmental, financial, and governance problems associated with the NLHPP, as well as details on proven alternatives to incineration. It is available at: https://stop-edmonton-incinerator.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2020-03-11-XR-incinerator-letter.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the Challenge
    Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the challenge District heating networks are a key component These challenges and complexities are best of a future low carbon London. They will addressed by bringing together engineering, provide the means to capture and distribute planning, finance and regulatory expertise into heat from a diverse mix of primary as well as an integrated project delivery unit. secondary heat sources to serve homes and businesses. Development of district heating Arup’s multidisciplinary approach to district networks at scale across the capital over the heating project delivery underpins our work next ten years is therefore essential for London in London and across the UK. We support to meet the Mayor’s target of meeting 25% public and private sector clients from early of London’s energy needs from decentralised stage resource assessments and policy advice sources by 2025. through to scheme design, business case and procurement. We work closely with clients at Thanks to previous mayoral programmes such each stage to scope the opportunities, analyse as the London Heat Map and Decentralised the fundamentals and develop practicable Energy Masterplanning (DEMaP), the solutions for bankable projects. challenge today is no longer knowing where the opportunities lie; it is understanding how to deliver them in the face of multiple barriers, including: - long investment horizons; - limited windows of opportunity; - an opaque regulatory framework; - a stigma of poorly performing schemes in the past; and - limited experience among local authorities and developers. 2 Understanding the challenge Delivering solutions The unique working philosophy at Arup – Through our global knowledge management founded on flexibility, transparency and systems, we are able to harness ideas and ability to deliver – is ideally suited to practical experience from projects worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNICAL and ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT of ENERGY CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES for MSW Report No. B/WM/00553/REP by W R Livingston Mitsui B
    TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MSW Report No. B/WM/00553/REP by W R Livingston Mitsui Babcock DTI PUB URN NO: 02/1347 The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Sustainable Energy Programmes. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v Objectives of the Project.......................................................................................v Technical Background..........................................................................................v Technical Description of the Selected Novel Thermal Processes for MSW..............................................................................................................vi Technical and Environmental Comparison of the Novel Processes...................ix The Economic Comparison Of Conventional Incineration, and the Novel Thermal Processes for MSW............................................................................. xi L INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1 2, TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE THERMAL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES FOR MSW....................................................................... 4 2.1 The Nature of Municipal SolidWaste (MSW)..................................... 4 2.2 Conventional Mass Bum Incinerators for MSW.................................. 5 2.3 The Novel Thermal Processes for MSW................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offsetting
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 81 | September 2013 Biodiversity Offsetting In this issue Offsetting and the Repeatability of David Stubbs Awarded Planning System Vegetation Mapping the Institute Medal Welcome Information Biodiversity Needs Powerful Narratives, In Practice No. 81, September 2013 Good Stories and the Right Words ISSN 1754-4882 The recent State of Nature report by 25 conservation and research organisations demonstrates Editor the ongoing losses of biodiversity in the UK. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 has a target Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services by 2020. Three key things are needed to stop the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystems. Editorial Board 1. A Deliverable Vision and Mechanisms to Deliver the Vision Mr Jonathan Barnes, Mr Matthew Chatfi eld, The overall vision and strategy is John Lawton’s Making Space for Nature report. This recognises Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, the importance of ecosystem services and sets out the future as needing to be coherent and Ms Sally Hayns, Dr William Latimer, made up of resilient ecological networks and More, Bigger, Better and Joined-up sites. Green Mrs Allison Potts, Mr Paul Rooney, and blue infrastructure is a fundamental part of these ecological networks that intersperse and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, join up villages, towns and cities. Miss Emma Toovey, Mr Darren Towers The Landscape Institute (LI) has recently revised its Green Infrastructure position statement. Green and blue infrastructure was the subject of the extremely successful joint CIEEM-LI Opinions expressed by contributors conference in Birmingham in early July.
    [Show full text]
  • North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008
    The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - North London Joint Waste Strategy SEA Draft May 2008 North London Waste Authority Unit 169, Lee Valley Technopark Ashley Road Tottenham N17 9LN Page 1 The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - FOREWORD Managing North London’s Waste The seven North London boroughs and the North London Waste Authority have achieved much in recent years, through co-ordinated and targeted action on waste prevention, recycling and composting. Our services have never been better. This strategy will be the foundation of still greater improvements as we start to develop and implement the next generation of waste services that will treat waste as a resource and will minimise environmental impacts, particularly those which may contribute to climate change. Above all we will ensure a balanced approach, with value for money on behalf of local council tax payers being essential if waste is truly to be managed in the best interests of North London. This work, however, will need everyone to play their part – all residents, all businesses, all local groups and organisations, and all public services must work to minimise the amount of waste we produce and maximise the amount we recycle and compost. I hope very much you will join us in this endeavour. Councillor Brian Coleman AM, FRSA Chairman of the North London Waste Authority Page 2 The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Page 4 Chapter 2: Background Page 10 Chapter 3: Statutory Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Energy Master Planning
    Decentralized Energy Master Planning The London Borough of Brent An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by Anthony Aldi Karen Anundson Andrew Bigelow Andrew Capulli Sponsoring Agency London Borough of Brent Planning Service Advisors Dominic Golding Ruth Smith Liaison Joyce Ip 29 April 2010 This report represents the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. Abstract The London Borough of Brent aims to reduce its carbon emissions via implementation of decentralized energy schemes including combined heat and power systems. The objective of this project was to aid Brent in the early stages of its decentralized energy master planning. By examining policies of other boroughs and studying major development areas within Brent, the WPI project team has concluded that the council must actively facilitate the development of decentralized energy systems through the use of existing practices and development of well supported policies. i Authorship Page This report was developed through a collaborative effort by the project team: Anthony Aldi, Karen Anundson, Andrew Bigelow, and Andrew Capulli. All sections were developed as team with each member contributing equally. ii Acknowledgements The team would like to thank our advisors from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Professor Dominic Golding and Professor Ruth Smith. The team would also like to thank the liaison Joyce Ip from the London Borough of Brent Planning Service and the entire Planning Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan Review (October 2018)
    Infrastructure Delivery Plan Review (October 2018) Contents Glossary 2 1. Introduction 1.1. Introduction 3 1.2. Context and Aims 3 1.3. Approach 3 1.4. Report Structure 4 2. Anticipated Growth in the Legacy Corporation Area 2.1. Introduction 5 2.2. Population and Economy 5 3. Social Infrastructure 3.1. Introduction 7 3.2. Primary and Secondary Education 7 3.3. Early Years 13 3.4. Primary Healthcare 15 3.5. Sports and leisure, open space and play space 17 3.6. Other community facilities 21 4. Transport 4.1. Transport 31 5. Utilities and Hard Infrastructure 5.1. Introduction 47 5.2. Energy 47 5.3. Waste Management 51 5.4. Sewage 53 5.5. Water 55 5.6. Flood Risk 57 6. Infrastructure Requirements and Funding 62 Appendix 1 – Draft IDP Long List of Projects 1 Glossary Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) – The Community Infrastructure Levy is a levy on development that local authorities in England and Wales may put in place to help deliver infrastructure to support the development of their area. Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) – Identifies the existing social, transport and utilities infrastructure within the Legacy Corporation area over the period 2014 to 2031. It is based on publicly available information and consultation with the four boroughs and infrastructure providers. Legacy Corporation’s Legacy Communities Scheme (LCS) – The Legacy Communities Scheme sought permission for the long-term development of five new neighbourhoods within the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Planning Application Reference: 11/90621/OUTODA 2 1. Introduction 1.1. Introduction The Legacy Corporation adopted both their Local Plan and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Charging Schedule in 2015.
    [Show full text]