SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY (For the Abbreviations Used Here, See Pp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY (For the Abbreviations Used Here, See Pp SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY (For the abbreviations used here, see pp. XXI-XXIII) A OTAKAR KLIMA: A VESTA. ANCIENT PERSIAN INSCRIPTIONS. MIDDLE PERSIAN LITERATURE Spiegel, F., Erdnische Altertumskunde (Leipzig 1871-8). Geldner, K. F., Avesta, die heiligen Bucher der Parsen (Stuttgart 1886-95). --, 'Avestaliteratur', in GIPh, II/2, I-53. Bartholomae, Ch., Altiranisches Worterbuch (Strassburg 1904). --, Die Gathas des Avesta (Strassburg 1905). --, Zum altiranischen Wiirterbuch (Strassburg 1906). Reichelt, H., AwestisclJes Elementarbuch (Heidelberg 1909). Nyberg, H. S., Die Religionen des alten Iran (Leipzig 1938). Herzfeld, E., Zoroaster and his World, 2 vols. (Princeton 1947). Duchesne-Guillemin, J., Zoroastre. Etude critique avec une traduction commentee des Gathas (Paris 1948). --, The Hymns of Zarathustra (London 1952). --, La religion de l'Iran ancien (Paris 1962). Henning, W. B., Zoroaster, Politician or Witch-Doctor? (Oxford 1951). Gershevitch, 1., The Avestan Hymn to Mithra (Cambridge 1959). Humbach, H., Die Gathas des Zarathustra, 2 vols. (Heidelberg 1959). Struve, V. V., 'Rodina zoroastrizma', SV, 5 (1948), 5 et seq. Klima, 0., 'Zarathustra', NO, 13 (1958), 66 et seq. --, 'The Date of Zoroaster', ArOr., 27 (1959),556-64. --, Zarathustra (Prague 1964). Abayev, V. 1., 'Skifskiy bit i reforma Zoroastra', ArOr., 24 (1956),23-56. Mole, M., 'Rituel et eschatologie dans Ie mazdeisme', Numen, 7 (1960), 148 et seq. --, Culte, mythe et cosmologie dans l'Iran ancien (Paris 1963). II Weissbach, F. H., 'Die altpersischen Inschriften', in GIPh, 11/2, 54-74. --, Die Keilinschriften der Achiimeniden (Leipzig 19II). Herzfeld, E., Altpersische Inschriften (Berlin 1938). 753 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY MeiIlet, A. and E. Benveniste, Grammaire du vieux perse, 2nd ed. (Paris 1931). Kent, R. G., Old Persian. Grammar, Texts, Lexicon, 2nd ed. (philadelphia 1953). Brandellstein, W. and M. Mayrhofer, Handbuch des Altpersischen (Wiesbaden 1964). Sykes, P., A History ofPersia, 2 vols. (London 1930). Konig, F. W., Alteste Geschichte der Meder und Perser (Leipzig 1934). Cameron, G. G., History of Early Iran (Chicago 1936). --, Persepolis Treasury Tablets (Chicago 1948). Olmstead, A. T., History of the Persian Empire, 2nd ed. (Chicago 1959). Herzfeld, E., Archiiologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 9 vols. (1929-38). --, Iran in the Ancient Archaeological Studies (1941). Ghirshman, R., L'Iran des origines a l'Islam (Paris 1951). Eng!. trans!.: Iran (Pelican, 1954). K.lirna, 0., 'Kyrove', NO, 15 (1960), 64 et seq. --, 'Dareios Veliky', Ibid., 180 et seq. Frye, R. N., The Heritage ofPersia (London 1963). III Noldeke, Th., Geschichte dey Perser und Araber zur Zeit der Sasaniden. Aus dey arabischen Chronik des Tabari... (Leiden 1879). Rozen, V. R., K voprosu 0/1 arabskikh perevodakh Khuddy-Ndme (St. Petersburg 1895). Salemann, K., 'Mittelpersisch', in GIPh, 1/1,249-332. Eng!. trans!. by L. Bogdanov (Bombay 1930). --, Manichiiische Studien (Memoires de l'Academie St. Petersbourg) (1908). --, 'Manichaica I', Bulletin de l'Academie St. Petersbourg (1907). --, 'UI-IV', Ibid. (1912).. West, E. W., 'Pahlavi Literature', in GIPh, 11/2, 75-129. Miiller, F. W. K., 'Handschriften-Reste in Estrangelo-Schrift aus Turfan, I', Sitzungsber. del' Preuss. Akad. (1904); --, 'II', Abhandlungen der Preuss. Akad. (1904). Bartholomae, Ch., Zum sasanidischen Recht, 5 vols. (Heidelberg 1918-23). --, Zur Kenntnis del' mitteliran. Mundarten, 6 vols. (Heidelberg 1916--25). Schaeder, H. H., 'Urform und Fortbildungen des manichii.ischen Systems', Vortriige del' Bibliothek Warburg 1924/1925 (Leipzig 1927). --, 'Iranische Beitriige, 1', Schriften der Konigsberger Gelehrten Gesellschaft, Geisteswiss. Kl., VI (Halle 1930). Andreas, F. C. and W. Henning, 'Mitteliranische Manichaica aus Chinesisch-Turkestan, I-Ill', Sit­ zungsber. der Preuss. Akad. (1932-4). Andreas, F. C. and K. Barr, 'BruchstUcke einer Pehlevi-Obersetzung der Psalmen', Sitzungsber. der Preuss. Akad. (1933). Hansen, 0., Die mittelpersischen Papyri der Papyrussammlung der Staatlichen Museen. zu Berlin (Berlin 1938). --, Mittelpersisches Lesebuch (Berlin 1963). Ghilain, A., Essai sur la langue parthe (Louvain 1939). Henning, W. B., 'The Disintegration of the Avestic Studies', Transactions of the Philological Society (1942). --, 'A Pahlavi Poem', BSOAS, 13 (1949-50), 641-8. --, 'Mitteliranisch', in Handbuch der Orientalistik, ed. by B. Spuler and H. Kees, 1/4-1 (Leiden 1958), 20-129· --, 'The Bactrian Inscription', BSOAS, 23 (1960),47-55. 754 KLiMA, A Altheim, F., Weltgeschichte Asiens im griechischen Zeitalter, 2 vols. (Halle 1947-8). --, 'The most ancient Romance of Chivalry', East and West, N.S. 9/3 (Rome 1958). --, Ein asiatischer Staat. Feudalismus unter den Sasaniden und ihren Nachbarn (Wiesbaden 1954). --, Geschichte der Hunnen, 5 vols. (Berlin 1959-62). --, Die aramiiische Sprache unter den Achaimeniden, I (Frankfurt a. M. 1959-63). Bailey, H. W., Zoroastrian Problems in the Ninth-Century Books (Oxford 1943). --, 'The Persian Language', in The Legacy ofPersia, ed. by A. J. Arberry (London 1953), 174-98. Christensen, A., L'Iran sous les Sassanides, 2nd ed. (Copenhagen 1944). Debevoise, N. C., A Political History ofParthia (Chicago 1938). Sprengling, M., Third Century Iran. Sapor and Kartir (Chicago 1953). Gershevitch, 1., 'Iranian Literature', in Literatures of the East (London 1953). Puech, H.-Ch., 'Le manicheisme, son fondateur, sa doctrine', Musee GUimet, Bibl. de diffusion, 56 (Paris 1949). Tedesco, P., 'Dialektologie der westiranischen Turfantexte', Le Monde oriental, 15 (1921), 184-258. Suhtscheck, Fr. von, 'Wolframs von Eschenbach Reimbearbeitung des Parsivalnama', Klio, 25 (1932), 50 et seq. Pagliaro, A. and A. Bausani, Storia della letteratura persiana (Milano 1960) ('Letteratura della Persia preislamica', 7-147). Widengren, G., Iranisch-semitische Kulturbegegnung in parthischer Zeit (Cologne-Opladen 1960). --, Mani und der Manichiiismus (Stuttgart 1961). Tarn, W. W., The Greeks in Bactria and India, 2nd ed. (Cambridge 1951). Tavadia, J. c., Die mittelpersische Sprache und Literatur der Zarathustrier (Iranische Texte und HilfsbUcher, 2) (Leipzig 1956). Nyberg, H. S., A Manual ofPahlavi, Part I: Texts (Wiesbaden 1964). Zaehner, R. C., Zurvan, a Zoroastrian Dilemma (Oxford 1955) . .Klima, 0., Mazdak. Geschichte einer sozialen Bewegung im sassanidischen Persien (Prague 1957). --, 'Povidka 0 J68tu Frjanovci', NO, 2/8, 17 et seq. --, 'Kniha cinll Ardaslra, syna Papakova', NO, 3/9, 217 et seq. --, 'Mesic v zivote staroperskeho cloveka', NO, 8 (1953), 151 et seq. --, 'Vyklad sachove hry a vynalezeni nev-artachseru', NO, II (1956),72 et seq. --, 'Manl', NO, 14 (1959), 68 et seq. --, 'Mazdak', Ibid., 150 et seq. --, 'Zur Chronologie von Manis Leben', ArOr., 19 (1951), 393-403. --, 'Iranische Miszellen', ArOr., 26 (1958), 603-16; 28 (1960), 457. --, Manis Zeit und Leben (Prague 1962). Freyman, A. A., Khorezmiyskiy yazik (Moscow 1951). D'yakonov, Y. M., M. M. D'yakonov, and V. A. Livshits, Dokumentf iz drevney Nisi (Moscow­ Leningrad 1951). Pigulevskaya, N. V., Goroda Irana v rannem srednevekov'ye (Moscow-Leningrad 1956). French trans!.: Les villes de {,Etat iranien aux epoques parthe et sassanide. Contribution a l'histoire sociale de la basse Antiquite (Paris-The Hague 1963). Braginskiy, I. S., Iz istorii tadzhikskoy narodnoy poezii (Moscow 1956). Abayev, V. I., Osetinskiy yazik ifol'klor, I (Moscow-Leningrad 1949). Boyce, M., The Manichaean Hymn Cycles in Parthian (London 1954). --, 'The Parthiang6siin and Iranian Minstrel Tradition', JRAS, 1957, 10-45. 755 B JAN RYPKA: HISTORY OF PERSIAN LITERATURE UP TO THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY For works published before 1900, see: Grundriss der iranischen Philologie, hrsg. von W. Geiger und E. Kuhn, 3 vols. (Stuttgart 1891-1904). 1. BIBLIOGRAPHICA (Catalogues of manuscripts are as a rule not listed; see below 'Preuss. Staatsbibliothek', 93-162. Several new catalogues of the Istanbul and Iranian libraries have since been published) 'Abstracta Islamica', in REI since 1927 (some special numbers on Iranian studies). Afshiir, Iraj, 'Kitab-shinasi-i Iran, I' (for 1333), in FarhanJ(- i Iriin-zamin, 2 (1333); II (for 1334, in book-form) (Tehran 1335); III (for 1335) (Tehran 1336); Kitiibhii-ilriin, IV (for 1336) (Tehran 1337); etc. --, Kitiib-shiniisi-i fihristhii-i nuskhahii-i kha{!i-i fiirsi dar kitiib-khiinahii-i dunyii (Tehran 1337) (Univ.). --, Fihrist-i maqiiliit-ifiirsi, I: 1910-58 (Tehran 1340) (Univ.). Arberry, A. J., Persian Books, Catalogue of the Library of the India Office, II/vi (London 1937). Babis and BaIra'is: see Bertel's, Ocherk, 200 et seq. (B V); List of Works in the New York Public Library (q.v.), 103-7. Bahii'is: see Avara (B III); lsi., 19 (1930), 81-4; Esslemont (B III); Root (B vlb; till 1938). Bertel's, Y. E., 'Bericht tiber die iranischen und turkologischen Studien in Russland 1914 bis 1920', Islamica, 3 (1927), 305-18. --, Ocherk (B v), 178-203. Bibliografia polskich prac orientalistycznych (1945-55). ed. by W. Kotanski and B. Majewska (based on the material of WI. Zajilczkowski) (Warsaw 1957). Bibliograficheskiy ukazatel' po Persii (Moscow 1928). Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya: on all matters of any importance. Brockelmann, C., GAL (B V; with exhaustive bibliography). Browne, E. G., LHP 1,481-96 (B v; survey of fundamental works). Central Asia: see Gafurov (D ra); Storey (q.v.). Chauvin, Victor, Bibliographie des ouvrages arabes ou relatifs aux Arabes. publies dans l' Europe chre­ tienne de 18IO a 1885, II (Liege 1897): 'Kalilah'; VIII (1909): 'Syntipas'
Recommended publications
  • Classical Persian Literature Bahman Solati (Ph.D), 2015 University of California, Berkeley [email protected]
    Classical Persian Literature Bahman Solati (Ph.D), 2015 University of California, Berkeley [email protected] Introduction Studying the roots of a particular literary history enables us to better understand the allusions the literature transmits and why we appreciate them. It also allows us to foresee how the literature may progress.1 I will try to keep this attitude in the reader’s mind in offering this brief summary of medieval Persian literature, a formidable task considering the variety and wealth of the texts and documentation on the subject.2 In this study we will pay special attention to the development of the Persian literature over the last millennia, focusing in particular on the initial development and background of various literary genres in Persian. Although the concept of literary genres is rather subjective and unstable,3 reviewing them is nonetheless a useful approach for a synopsis, facilitating greater understanding, deeper argumentation, and further speculation than would a simple listing of dates, titles, and basic biographical facts of the giants of Persian literature. Also key to literary examination is diachronicity, or the outlining of literary development through successive generations and periods. Thriving Persian literature, undoubtedly shaped by historic events, lends itself to this approach: one can observe vast differences between the Persian literature of the tenth century and that of the eleventh or the twelfth, and so on.4 The fourteenth century stands as a bridge between the previous and the later periods, the Mongol and Timurid, followed by the Ṣafavids in Persia and the Mughals in India. Given the importance of local courts and their support of poets and writers, it is quite understandable that literature would be significantly influenced by schools of thought in different provinces of the Persian world.5 In this essay, I use the word literature to refer to the written word adeptly and artistically created.
    [Show full text]
  • A Communication for Students of Folklore
    FOLKLORE FORUM A COMMUNICATION FOR STUDENTS OF FOLKLORE FOLKLORE FORUM A Conlrnunication for Students of Folklore Bibliographic and Special Series, No. 9 1972 ~ - Table of Contents Foreword Introduction...... ~..c.........................,...................... i Maps of Folklore and Folklife.........................................l Bibliographies$ Dictionaries, Indexes, ad a Guide to Fieldwork ..................1............................2 Peoples, Cultures, and CUS~O~S........................................~ Hik~y-e................................................................. 7 Drma................................................,...............l 3 Epic and Romance .....................................................14 Proverbs and Riddles.. ................... .......................... .18 Magic, Superstition, and Medicine....................................21 Islam, Sufism and Philosophy .........................................28 Folktale CoZlections.................................................30 Author Inde~..................................~.................~....3~ Area Index ........................................................... 38 Chief Editor: John M. Vlach Manuscript Editors: Ben Adam Kroup, Dick Sweterlitsch Reviews Editor : Howard Wight Marshall Managing Editor: Janet Gilmore Bibliographic and Special Series Editor: W. K. McNeil " Corresponding Editors : R. Gerald Alvey (University of ~ennsylvania) Bruce Giuliano (UCWL) Advisory Board: Gerald Cashion, Philip Brandt George, Andrea Greenberg The Folklore
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Shahnamafirdausi in Contemporary Literature
    International Conference on Arts, Culture, Literature, Languages, Gender Studies/ Sexuality, Humanities and Philosophy for Sustainable Societal Development The Impact of Shahnamafirdausi in Contemporary Literature Mumtaz Ahmed Deptt of Persian Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, U.P India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—There is not an iota of doubt, that Shahnameh (the book Persian-speaking people would be the publication of a critical of kings) is the consequence of 30 years of indefatigable and resolute and reliable edition of the Shahnameh. The Borūḵīm endeavor by the master of Persian language and literature, Hakim Publishing House in Tehran has tried to address this matter Abulqasim Firdausi who is known to the Iranian people and the and published the entire text of the Šāh-nāma, based on Persian speaking nations as the reviver of Persian language and Vullersversion under the supervision of MojtabaMinovi, literature. Firdausi Tusi started writing shahnama in 977 A.D and completed in 8 March 1030 A.D. Iranians owe to Firdausi to Abbas Eqbal, SolaymanHaïm and Said Nafisi. invigorate their language and literature and that is why Firdausi is Fritz Wolff, made a lasting contribution with the considered to be the most prominent Persian poet of all times. though publication of his glossary of Ferdowsi'sShahnameh some scholar have their own notions that Firdausi's work, in literary and formational context, cannot be compared to those of (GlossarzuFerdosisSchahname), which was offered as a gift to Hafiz, Sa'di, Rumi and Rudaki as the nature of Firdausi's work is the Persian people by the German ambassador in the first day essentially different from what other notable Persian poets have of the congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Firdawsi: a Scholium
    Firdawsi: A Scholium by Burzine Waghmar and Sunil Sharma Hakim Abu’l-Qasim Mansur b. al-Hasan al-Firdawsi al-Tusi (ca. 940/41-ca. 1020/25), a middle- ranking aristocrat recognised by his nom de plume, Firdawsi (‘paradisiacal’), was a central figure in the history of classical Persian literature.1 His monumental epic poem, Shahnama (‘Book of Kings’), conjures Homeric as well as Miltonic associations to the Iranian mind thus ensuring him a niche in the universal literary canon.2 This mytho-poetic masterpiece, dealing with Persian legendary and recorded history from the first man to the Arab conquest in AD 652, has been continuously read, recited, remembered, and re-enacted across the Iranian-speaking oecumene straddling West, Central and South Asia for over a millennium.3 Starting from the nineteenth century, a virtual school of Shahnama studies has flourished as successive generations of scholars interpreted and contextualised the text in published abridgements, translations and new editions. Animated productions of Rustam’s adventures, as those of Hercules, are keenly enjoyed by adults and children in contemporary Iran and the diaspora.4 Although Firdawsi dedicated his work to Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (r. 998-1030), his life was spent in the town of Tus, Khurasan, away from the courts of princes and paladins. For almost a generation, about thirty years, he quietly worked on his magnum opus and interspersed it with brief vignettes of his personal life for the reader. As Shahpur Shahbazi has noted: Much has been written on Ferdowsī and his work, but even learned studies have given inharmonious results for the simple reasons that our sources are late, uncritical and contradictory, and that … [t]he best authority is the Šāhnāma itself as the poet frequently breaks his narrative to insert a few lines about his age, work and thoughts.5 Firdawsi belonged to the traditional squirearchy or dihqan class emotively tied to its land and ancient Persian culture.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Persian Literature Volume XVII Volumes of a History of Persian Literature
    A History of Persian Literature Volume XVII Volumes of A History of Persian Literature I General Introduction to Persian Literature II Persian Poetry in the Classical Era, 800–1500 Panegyrics (qaside), Short Lyrics (ghazal); Quatrains (robâ’i) III Persian Poetry in the Classical Era, 800–1500 Narrative Poems in Couplet form (mathnavis); Strophic Poems; Occasional Poems (qat’e); Satirical and Invective poetry; shahrâshub IV Heroic Epic The Shahnameh and its Legacy V Persian Prose VI Religious and Mystical Literature VII Persian Poetry, 1500–1900 From the Safavids to the Dawn of the Constitutional Movement VIII Persian Poetry from outside Iran The Indian Subcontinent, Anatolia, Central Asia after Timur IX Persian Prose from outside Iran The Indian Subcontinent, Anatolia, Central Asia after Timur X Persian Historiography XI Literature of the early Twentieth Century From the Constitutional Period to Reza Shah XII Modern Persian Poetry, 1940 to the Present Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan XIII Modern Fiction and Drama XIV Biographies of the Poets and Writers of the Classical Period XV Biographies of the Poets and Writers of the Modern Period; Literary Terms XVI General Index Companion Volumes to A History of Persian Literature: XVII Companion Volume I: The Literature of Pre- Islamic Iran XVIII Companion Volume II: Literature in Iranian Languages other than Persian Kurdish, Pashto, Balochi, Ossetic; Persian and Tajik Oral Literatures A HistorY of Persian LiteratUre General Editor – Ehsan Yarshater Volume XVII The Literature of Pre-Islamic Iran Companion Volume I to A History of Persian Literature Edited by Ronald E. Emmerick & Maria Macuch Sponsored by Persian Heritage Foundation (New York) & Center for Iranian Studies, Columbia University Published in 2009 by I.
    [Show full text]
  • GHAREHGOZLOU, BAHAREH, Ph.D., August 2018 TRANSLATION STUDIES
    GHAREHGOZLOU, BAHAREH, Ph.D., August 2018 TRANSLATION STUDIES A STUDY OF PERSIAN-ENGLISH LITERARY TRANSLATION FLOWS: TEXTS AND PARATEXTS IN THREE HISTORICAL CONTEXTS (261 PP.) Dissertation Advisor: Françoise Massardier-Kenney This dissertation addresses the need to expand translation scholarship through the inclusion of research into different translation traditions and histories (D’hulst 2001: 5; Bandia 2006; Tymoczko 2006: 15; Baker 2009: 1); the importance of compiling bibliographies of translations in a variety of translation traditions (Pym 1998: 42; D’hulst 2010: 400); and the need for empirical studies on the functional aspects of (translation) paratexts (Genette 1997: 12–15). It provides a digital bibliography that documents what works of Persian literature were translated into English, by whom, where, and when, and explores how these translations were presented to Anglophone readers across three historical periods—1925–1941, 1942–1979, and 1980–2015— marked by important socio-political events in the contemporary history of Iran and the country’s shifting relations with the Anglophone West. Through a methodical search in the library of congress catalogued in OCLC WorldCat, a bibliographical database including 863 editions of Persian-English literary translations along with their relevant metadata—titles in Persian, authors, translators, publishers, and dates and places of publication—was compiled and, through a quantitative analysis of this bibliographical data over time, patterns of translation publication across the given periods
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Koroglu Destani
    A STUDY OF KOROGLU DESTANI MAHMUT ORTA FRANKFURT AM MAIN- 2012 1 A STUDY OF KOROGLU DESTANI Mahmut ORTA Just like in all of the world literatures, the first examples of the Turkish Literatures were the epics. The term of "destan" (epic) was and has been used for several verse genres and types within the Turkish literary traditions. What is the epic? •The epics that are the offset works of all the world literatures are the long stories written in verse style.We xan give some of the epics examples. Some Of Turkısh Myths And Legends: • Köroğlu Myth • Kız Kulesi (Maiden’s Tower) Myth • Dede Korkut • Nasreddın Hodja, etc. Now we can see the epic’s story: THE STORY OF KOROGLU The Story Of Koroglu is one of the most widespread of the Turkic destans1 It is shared not only by nearly all Turkic peoples, but also by some non-Turkic neighboring communities, such as the Armenians, Georgians, Kurds, Tajiks, and Afghans. There are, of course, differences among these many versions, but in general they can be separated into two major groups, the western and the eastern, with the Caspian Sea as a rough boundary between them. Both groups of versions have ties, whether geographical or cultural, to Persia. Although the destan’s path of transmission is not yet fully understood, most researchers agree that it originated in the south Caucasus region, most likely Azerbaijan, and traveled eastward from there (also slightly westward, into Anatolia and the Balkans, but it is the eastward movement that concerns us more here)2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oriental Institute the Oriental Institute ( Is a Public Non-University Research Institution
    Oriental English edition Institute Science 11 Around Us What is it… Oriental Institute The oriental institute (www.orient.cas.cz) is a public non-university research institution. Formally established in 1922, just six years after SOAS in London, the Oriental Institute is one of the oldest institutions dedicated to the study of Oriental cultures in Central and Eastern Europe. Since 1993, it has fallen admin- istratively under the auspices of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AS CR), an umbrella research institution similar in function to its counterparts in continental Europe, such as the CNRS in France. The AS CR was established in 1992 as the Czech successor to the former Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. It is set up as a complex of 54 public research institutions. The primary mission of the AS CR and its institutes is to conduct basic research in a broad spectrum of the natural, technical and social sciences and the humanities. This research, whether highly specialized or interdisciplinary in nature, aims to advance developments in scientific knowledge at the international level, while also taking into account the specific needs of both Czech society and national culture. In a country such as the Czech Republic, where university departments deal- ing with Oriental studies tend to be small and understaffed, the structure of non-university research bodies with permanent research positions brings numer- ous benefits. Among other things, scholars are enabled to pursue their specializa- tions according to the needs of relevant fields of study, aiming correspondingly at the highest levels of research quality. The framework of the Institute allows for a flexible and open-ended approach to research initiatives in Asia-related topics, creating, in effect, an ideal environment for interdisciplinary research.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah
    Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah Culture and Cultural Politics Under Reza Shah presents a collection of innovative research on the interaction of culture and politics accompanying the vigorous modernization program of the first Pahlavi ruler. Examining a broad spectrum of this multifaceted interaction it makes an important contribution to the cultural history of the 1920s and 1930s in Iran, when, under the rule of Reza Shah Pahlavi, dramatic changes took place inside Iranian society. With special reference to the practical implementation of specific reform endeavors, the various contributions critically analyze different facets of the relationship between cultural politics, individual reformers, and the everyday life of modernist Iranians. Interpreting culture in its broadest sense, this book brings together con- tributions from different disciplines such as literary history, social history, ethnomusicology, art history, and Middle Eastern politics. In this way, it combines for the first time the cultural history of Iran’s modernity with the politics of the Reza Shah period. Challenging a limited understanding of authoritarian rule under Reza Shah, this book is a useful contribution to existing literature for students and scholars of Middle Eastern History, Iranian History, and Iranian Culture. Dr Bianca Devos is Assistant Professor/Lecturer at the Center for Near and Middle East Studies at the University of Marburg (Germany). Her main fields of research are Iran’s modern history, particularly the press and early modern entrepreneurship, and literary history. Professor Christoph Werner holds the Chair of Iranian Studies at the Center for Near and Middle East Studies at the University of Marburg (Germany). His main fields of interest are Qajar history, vaqf studies, and modern Persian literature.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2012 Sima Daad
    ©2012 Sima Daad Medieval Persian Texts and Modern Contexts: Mohammad Qazvini and the Modern Reception of Chahār Maqāle (The Four Discourses) Sima Daad A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2012 Reading Committee: Leroy Searle, Chair Ahmad Karimi-Hakkak Raimonda Modiano William Streitberger Program authorized to offer the degree: Comparative Literature – Textual Studies University of Washington Abstract Medieval Persian Texts and Modern Contexts: Mohammad Qazvini and the Modern Reception of Chahār Maqāle (The Four Discourses) Sima Daad Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Leroy F. Searle Department of English and Comparative Literature This five-chapter dissertation engages two conventionally separated fields— Modern Perso-Islamic textual criticism inaugurated by Mohammed Qazvini in the context of early 20th –century Iran and Orientalist scholarship, and post-modernist literary theory—to examine the significance of Chahār Maqāle for the intellectual discourse of modernity in Iran. Modern Textual Criticism applies its scientific philological research to the historical restoration of texts, ordinarily in a systematic method of excavation, documentation and establishment of the textual history, removal of non-authorial interpolations, avoidance of personal influence, and restoration of an original-authorial text. Post-modernist literary theory provides analytical tools for reading texts and editions within their respective milieux as historical products capable of trans-historical continuity. In particular this dissertation argues that the original and the reproduced versions of the text each reveals nuances of a particular historical moment that are not directly retrievable from antiquity, yet both versions share a continuing concern for recovering elements of Iranian identity, frequently obscured by the effects of a long history of Islamization.
    [Show full text]
  • Omar Khayyam's Ruba'iyat and Rumi's Masnavi Interpreted. The
    Chapter 6 Omar Khayyam’s Ruba’iyat and Rumi’s Masnavi Interpreted. The Politics and Scholarship of Translating Persian Poetry 1Truth and Poetry of TwoPersian Poets In 1072,the youngphilosopher Omar Khayyamenteredthe CentralAsian capital of scholarshipSamarkand.Ashewalkedthroughthe city,hefound amob assault- ingastudentofthe greatphilosopher Ibn Sina (Avicenna).Khayyam intervened to save thestudent.But hisreputationasaphilosopherand poet of hereticmateri- alistverseshad preceded Khayyamand when thecrowd discovered whohewas, they turned on himand roughedhim up.Khayyam wasthen broughtbeforeSa- markand’sleading qadi (judge/magistrate),Abu Taher. Insteadofcondemning thephilosopher,who challenged thestricturesoforthodoxtheology, AbuTaher recognised hisintellect, butwarned Khayyamofutteringhis critical poetry openly. Theqadihandedthe philosopherabeautifulnotebookintowhich he should write hiswitty andthought-provoking quatrains,instead of speaking hispoems openly andthereby endangeringhis ownsafety. This notebook wastobecomethe manu- script that marked thebeginning of the Ruba’iyat of Omar Khayyam, whichwould gain global fame in thenineteenthcentury andbecomefor decadesthe second most printedbookinthe Englishspeakingworld afterthe Bible. This is how Amin Maalouf has it in the opening of his historic fiction novel Samarcande.¹ In areview afew years later,Rashid noted that “Omar Khayyam is treated likeamedieval Salman Rushdie”,onlythat backinthe Middle Ages, dur- ing the days of glorious scientific Islam,hewas not condemned to death by the orthodoxy but protected by an Islamic jurist.² The almostsimultaneous publica- tion of Samarcande and Rushdie’s Satanic Verses in 1988 preclude Maalouffrom having been influenced by Khomeini’sinfamous fatwa against the British Indian author ayearlater,but Rashid’scommentary pointstothe rise of political Islam and its growingintolerance of contrarian views in the 1980s, which had also seen the ban of Khayyam’s Ruba’iyat in Iran after the revolution in 1979.³ Maa- Amin Maalouf, Samarcande (Paris:Jean-Claude Lattès, 1988), 4–17.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetics of Romantic Love in Vis & Rāmin
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE POETICS OF ROMANTIC LOVE IN VIS & RĀMIN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY CAMERON LINDLEY CROSS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2015 Copyright © 2015 by Cameron Lindley Cross All Rights Reserved To TJ Quinn and Farouk Abdel Wahab In Memoriam َ َ ُّ َ ْ َ ً ْ اﻻﻳ ﺎ ﻛﻳ ﻬ ﺎاﻟ ﺴ ﺎﻗ ﻰ ا ِدر ﻛ ﺄﺳ ﺎ وﻧ ِﺎوﻟ ﻬ ﺎ َ ُ ُ ﻛ ﻪ ِ ﻋﺸ ﻖ آﺳ ﺎن ﻧِﻤ ﻮد ا ول َوﻟ ﻰ اﻓ ﺘ ﺎد ﻣﺸ ِ ﻜﻠ ﻬ ﺎ Boy bring round the wine and give me some for love that at first seemed easy turned difficult —Ḥāfeẓ (tr. Geoffrey Squires) Contents Abstract viii Acknowledgments ix A Note on Transcription xiii Transliteration Charts xix List of Figures xxi List of Tables xxii List of Abbreviations xxiii Introduction xxiv Proem: The Tale of Fakhri and the Slave-Boy 1 1 The Story of the Story 5 1.1 A portrait of the artist (as a young man?) ......................... 7 1.2 The rise of the Seljuk Turks ................................ 20 1.3 The mysterious sources of Vis & Rāmin .......................... 26 1.4 The Nachleben ....................................... 36 1.5 Recovery, revulsion, and revision ............................. 48 1.6 Welcome to the conversation ............................... 54 2 Finding Romance 71 2.1 The Persian renaissance .................................. 78 2.2 “Love-stories and all that sort of stuff” ........................... 94 2.3 Sailing the sea: Vāmeq & ʿAẕrā ............................... 106 v 2.4 Traversing the desert: Varqa & Golshāh .........................
    [Show full text]