ANALYSIS of ALTERNATIVES Public Version

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANALYSIS of ALTERNATIVES Public Version ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES Public Version Legal name of applicant(s): AkzoNobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals Submitted by: AkzoNobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals Substance: Sodium dichromate Use title: Use 1: Use of sodium dichromate as an additive for suppressing parasitic reactions and oxygen evolution, pH buffering and cathode corrosion protection in the electrolytic manufacture of sodium chlorate, with or without subsequent production of chlorine dioxide Use 2: Use of sodium dichromate as an additive for suppressing parasitic reactions and oxygen evolution, pH buffering and cathode corrosion protection in the electrolytic manufacture of potassium chlorate. Use number: 1 & 2 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd, with reasonable skill, care and diligence under a contract to the client and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the contract. Risk & Policy Analysis Ltd will accept no responsibility towards the client and third parties in respect of any matters outside the scope of the contract. This report has been prepared for the client and we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of the report to third parties. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Note This public version of the Analysis of Alternatives includes some redacted text. The letters indicated within each piece of redacted text correspond to the type of justification for confidentiality claims which is included as an Annex (Section 7) in the complete version of the document. Table of contents 1 Summary..............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Use applied for................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Potential alternatives for sodium dichromate................................................................................1 1.3 Suitability of potential alternatives to sodium dichromate............................................................4 1.4 Feasibility and availability of potential alternatives for sodium dichromate .................................6 1.5 Actions needed to improve the suitability and availability of potential alternatives...................10 2 Analysis of substance function............................................................................................13 2.1 The chlorate process.....................................................................................................................13 2.2 Conditions of use and technical feasibility criteria.......................................................................20 2.3 Summary of functionality of sodium dichromate in the “Applied for Use” .................................27 3 Annual tonnage.................................................................................................................. 31 3.1 Tonnage band ...............................................................................................................................31 3.2 Trends in the consumption of sodium dichromate ......................................................................31 3.3 Form and usage of sodium dichromate........................................................................................31 4 Identification of possible alternatives.................................................................................. 33 4.1 List of possible alternatives...........................................................................................................33 4.2 Description of efforts made to identify possible alternatives ......................................................33 4.3 Screening of identified alternatives..............................................................................................68 5 Suitability and availability of possible alternatives...............................................................89 5.1 Introduction and scope of analysis ...............................................................................................89 5.2 Chromium(III) chloride..................................................................................................................89 5.3 Sodium molybdate........................................................................................................................99 5.4 Molybdenum-based coatings .....................................................................................................109 5.5 Two-compartment electrolytic systems .....................................................................................116 6 Overall conclusions on suitability and availability of possible alternatives.......................... 123 6.1 Technical feasibility of shortlisted alternatives ..........................................................................123 6.2 Economic feasibility of shortlisted alternatives..........................................................................125 6.3 Reduction of risks from the use of shortlisted alternatives........................................................126 6.4 Availability of shortlisted alternatives ........................................................................................128 6.5 Overall conclusion.......................................................................................................................129 7 Annex – Justifications for confidentiality claims................................................................. 131 8 Appendix 1 – Information sources..................................................................................... 133 9 Appendix 2 – Comparative hazard and risk characterisation of alternatives........................ 137 9.1 Background .................................................................................................................................137 9.2 Reference values for sodium dichromate and alternative substances.......................................137 9.3 Exposure Assessment..................................................................................................................160 9.4 Comparative risk characterisation..............................................................................................164 9.5 References for this Appendix......................................................................................................166 10 Appendix 3 – Economic feasibility ..................................................................................... 169 10.1 Economic feasibility of sodium molybdate.................................................................................169 10.2 Economic feasibility of molybdenum-based coatings ................................................................177 10.3 Economic feasibility of two-compartment electrolytic systems.................................................182 DECLARATION We, AkzoNobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals, request that the information blanked out in the “public version” of the Analysis of Alternatives is not disclosed. We hereby declare that, to the best of our knowledge as of today 2015-10-21 the information is not publicly available, and in accordance with the due measures of protection that we have implemented, a member of the public should not be able to obtain access to this information without our consent or that of the third party whose commercial interests are at stake. Bohus, 2015-10-21 Ingrid Brassart Regulatory Affairs Manager 1 Summary 1.1 Use applied for This Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) is part of an Application for the Authorisation (AfA) for the continued use of sodium dichromate (CAS No. 7789-12-0 & 10588-01-9; EINECS No. 234-190-3, hereafter referred to as “SD”) by the applicant, AkzoNobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals (hereafter referred to as AkzoNobel), in the sodium chlorate (NaClO3) manufacturing process, where it acts as a crucial additive to the process. Generation of sodium chlorate is based on the electrolysis of sodium chloride (NaCl), at a controlled pH range, where the sodium chloride is converted into sodium chlorate while hydrogen evolves as a co-product. SD acts to increase the current efficiency of the conversion process by suppressing unwanted (parasitic cathodic) reactions and thus reducing the use of electrical energy, and acts as a pH buffer to ensure optimal process conditions are maintained. It also has a crucial role in limiting the amount of oxygen generated during the process, as the presence of oxygen poses a serious hazard because it forms explosive atmospheres in the presence of hydrogen. AkzoNobel is the only EU producer of potassium chlorate and sodium dichromate is also required for this use, fulfilling the same technical role as for sodium chlorate. Therefore, the AoA is equally applicable for both of these uses. AkzoNobel uses ''''''#B#''''''' tonnes of SD out of a total consumption of <40 tonnes consumed in this use by EU-based manufacturers of sodium chlorate. This overall volume represents less than 1% of the entire amount of SD used each year in the EU. This AoA has been prepared by an independent third party working on behalf of AkzoNobel and a further six EU-based users of SD who collectively formed the Sodium Dichromate Authorisation Consortium (hereafter referred to as SDAC). While there is notable overlap in the information presented and the argumentation made in the AoA documents of all seven applicants, each AoA
Recommended publications
  • Material Safety Data Sheet
    THE CHEM-MET COMPANY – SAFETY DATA SHEET – SODIUM MOLYBDATE DIHYDRATE THE CHEM-MET COMPANY 6419 YOCHELSON PLACE P.O. BOX 819 CLINTON, MARYLAND 20735 (301) 868-3355 FAX (301) 868-3355 SAFETY DATA SHEET SODIUM MOLYBDATE DIHYDRATE PRODUCT INFORMATION DATA SHEET SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING 1.1. Product identifier. Substance name: Sodium Molybdate Dihydrate. Chemical formula: Na2MoO4 · 2 H2O. Synonyms/trade names: Sodium Molybdate Dehydrate. Disodium Molybdate Dihydrate. Sodium Molybdate Crystals Index No. (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008): None. CAS Numbers: 10102-40-6. 7631-95-0 (for the anhydrous Na2MoO4). EC No.: 231-551-7 (assumed to cover both dihydrate and anhydrous form). 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against: 1.2.1. Relevant identified uses: Micronutrient in manufacture and use of fertilizers. Micronutrient in feed additives. Corrosion inhibitor. Manufacture of pigments. Industrial detergent for metal surface treatment. Cleaning & maintenance material. As coolant/anti-freeze/heat transfer fluid. Metal working fluids. Industrial formulation & use of lubrication additives, lubricants and greases. Manufacture of enamels frits, ceramics. Manufacture & use of water treatments chemicals, inc. water softener. Polymer preparations & compounds. Industrial chemical products such as pH regulator, flocculants, precipitants, neutralization agents Extraction agents. Photochemicals. Manufacture and use of catalysts, inc. regeneration & recycling. 1.2.2. Uses advised against: There are no identified uses advised against. 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet: THE CHEM-MET COMPANY 6419 YOCHELSON PLACE/ P.O. BOX 819 CLINTON, MARYLAND 20735 USA Tel: 301.868.3355 Fax: 301.868.8946 1 Email: [email protected] (Victor Fox, President); [email protected] (Brendan Hickey, Vice President) THE CHEM-MET COMPANY – SAFETY DATA SHEET – SODIUM MOLYBDATE DIHYDRATE 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of High−Temperature Characteristics of the Sintered
    686 EJ60ケooho勿zゑsψりノ 一Article一 Improvement of High-Temperature Characteristics of the Sintered Nickel Positive Electrode for an Alkaline Storage Battery Katsuhiko SHINYAMA,*Yoshifumi MAGARI,Atsuhiro FUNAHASHI, Toshiyuki NOHMA,and Ikuo YONEZU R&D Business Unit,Mobile Energy Company,Sanyo Electric Co.,Ltd.(7-3-21bukidai-higashimachi,Nishi-ku,Kobe City,Hyogo651-2242,Japan) Received August9,2002;Accepted May20,2003 The high-temperature characteristics of sintered nickel positive electrodes for alkaline storage batteries such as nickel・metal hydride batteries and nicke1-cadmium batteries were investigated.Generally,the discharge capacity of an alkaline storage battery charged at high temperature is smaller than that charged at room temperature due to the oxygen evolution reaction.In order to enhance high-temperature characteristics,we coated sintered n量ckel positive electrodes with yttrium hydroxide,calcium hydroxide or cobalt hydroxide.Th6high-temperature characteristics of the sintered nickel positive electrodes coated with y血ium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide by immersing them in sodium hydroxide solution after immersing in nitrate solution were greatly enhanced because of the increased oxy. gen OVerVOltage. κ¢y防鳩:Sintered Nickel Positive Electrode,High-temperature Characteristics,Alkaline Storage Battery,Oxygen Overvoltage l lntroduction In the past,the electrolyte composition3)and dissolv- Cun℃ntly,alkaline storage batteries such as nicke1- ing such elements as cobalt and calcium into nickel hy- cadmium batteries and nickel-metal hydride
    [Show full text]
  • Category Approaches, Read-Across, (Q)SAR Technical Report No
    Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR Technical Report No. 116 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR Technical Report No. 116 Brussels, November 2012 ISSN-0773-8072-116 (print) ISSN-2079-1526-116 (online) Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR ECETOC Technical Report No. 116 © Copyright – ECETOC AISBL European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals 2 Avenue E. Van Nieuwenhuyse (Bte 8), B-1160 Brussels, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Applications to reproduce, store, copy or translate should be made to the Secretary General. ECETOC welcomes such applications. Reference to the document, its title and summary may be copied or abstracted in data retrieval systems without subsequent reference. The content of this document has been prepared and reviewed by experts on behalf of ECETOC with all possible care and from the available scientific information. It is provided for information only. ECETOC cannot accept any responsibility or liability and does not provide a warranty for any use or interpretation of the material contained in the publication. ECETOC TR No. 116 Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Terms of reference 4 1.2 Scope 5 1.3 Roadmap of the report 6 2. DEFINITIONS FOR NON-TESTING APPROACHES 8 2.1 Data gap filling 9 2.1.1 Read-across 9 2.1.2 Trend analysis and computational methods based on internal models 13 2.1.3 External (Q)SAR models and expert systems 14 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Molybdates: an Alternative to Hexavalent Chromates in Corrosion
    Molybdates: An Alternative to Hexavalent Chromates 3ytzt7n2 in Corrosion Prevention and Control qz ,+ B3 F Stiles C. Thompson Sverdrup Technology, Inc. 626 Anchors St. NW Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 (904) 833-7600 Introduction Hexavalent chromates have been the preferred corrosion inhibitor in military systems for years. Chromate conversion coatings are specified in MIL-STD-808, “Finishes, Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Support Equipment ”, for aluminum, magnesium, and plated steel. A number of primers are formulated with zinc or strontium chromate. Passivation treatments for stainless steels frequently specify chromic acid. Some anodic coatings specify baths containing chromic and sulfuric acid and a pcst treatment or rinse with aqueous sodium dichromate. Even water-based primers formulated for volatile organic I compound (VOC) compliance in such areas as southern California contain chromate-based corrosion inhibitors. Chromates are decreasing in industrial use, however, as concerns about their environmental risks and toxicity increase. One pollution prevention approach is to substitute analogs of chromates in similar applications. Molybdate is one such analog of lower toxicity. Federal Environmental Regulations A number of environmental regulations now control hexavalent chromate. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Under TSCA, the Environmental Protection Agency @PA) must be notified 90 days prior to manufacture. EPA may restrict or prohibit manufacture where there is unreasonable risk to the environment. EPA also has the authority to require testing for health or environmental effects. No current regulation specifies molybdate. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA regulates the treatment, storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste (HW). The EPA HW number for hexavalent chromium is D007.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Coprecipitation Technique Using Yttrium Hydroxide for the Preconcentration and Separation of Trace Elements in Saline Water Prior to Their ICP-AES Determination
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES AUGUST 2007, VOL. 23 1021 2007 © The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry Notes Rapid Coprecipitation Technique Using Yttrium Hydroxide for the Preconcentration and Separation of Trace Elements in Saline Water Prior to Their ICP-AES Determination Shigehiro KAGAYA,† Satoshi MIWA, Toshiyuki MIZUNO, and Koji TOHDA Graduate School of Science and Engineering for Research, University of Toyama, Gofuku 3190, Toyama 930–8555, Japan Yttrium hydroxide quantitatively coprecipitated Be(II), Ti(IV), Cr(III), Mn(II), Fe(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) at pH 9.6 – 10.0 for seawater and pH 10.5 – 11.4 for a table-salt solution. The coprecipitated elements could be determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry; yttrium was used as an internal standard element. The detection limits ranged from 0.0016 μg (Mn(II)) to 0.22 μg (Zn(II)) in 100 mL of sample solutions. The operation time required to separate 11 elements was approximately 30 min. (Received May 25, 2007; Accepted June 18, 2007; Published August 10, 2007) It is important to determine trace elements in environmental of many elements. However, to our knowledge, no application samples from the viewpoint of environmental management and/or of yttrium hydroxide to the preconcentration/separation of trace protection from hazardous infection1 as well as comprehension elements in environmental water samples has been reported. of the distribution of trace elements in the environment.2 In this work, we developed a preconcentration/separation Recently, multielement profiling analysis, in which major-to- method based on a rapid coprecipitation technique using yttrium ultratrace elements are determined and the distribution patterns hydroxide as a coprecipitant for the determination of trace of the elements are analyzed, has gathered attention to provide elements in environmental water samples, especially saline information about the elemental cycle in the environment.3,4 water.
    [Show full text]
  • A Titrimetric Determination of Thorium John J
    Ames Laboratory ISC Technical Reports Ames Laboratory 6-1954 A titrimetric determination of thorium John J. Ford Iowa State College James S. Fritz Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ameslab_iscreports Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Ford, John J. and Fritz, James S., "A titrimetric determination of thorium" (1954). Ames Laboratory ISC Technical Reports. 92. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ameslab_iscreports/92 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Ames Laboratory at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ames Laboratory ISC Technical Reports by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A titrimetric determination of thorium Abstract A rapid, accurate method for thorium is proposed in which thorium is titrated with a standard solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Alizarin Red S serves as the indicator, a sharp change from pink to yellow marking the end point of the titration. The method is selective for thorium although several cations and anions interfere. A preliminary extraction of thorium nitrate by mentyl oxide provides an excellent separation of thorium from most interfering ions. Keywords Ames Laboratory Disciplines Chemistry This report is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ameslab_iscreports/92 Physical 'cieuccs Re· dmg Room UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ISC-520 A TITRIMETRIC DETERMINATION OF THORIUM By John J. Ford James S. Fritz June 1954 Technical Information Service, Oak Ridge, Tennessee J Subject Category, CHEMISTRY. Work performed under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Anti-Corrosion and Anti-Galling Performance
    EVALUATION OF ANTI-CORROSION AND ANTI-GALLING PERFORMANCE OF A NOVEL GREASE COMPOUND A Thesis by JOHN OLUMIDE REIS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Hong Liang Committee Members, Chii-Der Suh Sevan Goenezan Head of Department, Andreas A. Polycarpou December 2017 Major Subject: Mechanical Engineering Copyright 2017 John Olumide Reis ABSTRACT In this research, the effectiveness of CeO2, Y2O3 and Al2O3 as anti-corrosion and anti-wear additives in commercial grease was investigated. An experimental approach was used to carry on the research. The weight loss of steel coupons protected with a layer of thin grease, with and without the anti-corrosion additives in a corrosive environment was determined. The Friction factor of the grease compound was also evaluated. The accelerated corrosion tests were performed in a salt spray chamber for an exposure time of 2 weeks (336 hours). The corrosive medium was 5 % wt. of Brine. By varying the weight compositions of the additives (1% wt. and 3% wt.), and comparing the corrosion rates with that of base grease, the effectiveness of various grease additives was evaluated. The result showed that corrosive losses of the test samples can be effectively reduced by adding relatively small amounts of CeO2, Y2O3 and Al2O3 to the base grease. Corroded surfaces were examined using the Optical microscope to clarify the corrosion mechanism. The friction test was carried out using a galling tester. The standard test procedure as specified in API RP 7A1 was followed.
    [Show full text]
  • ALB Materials Inc Product List.Xlsx
    ALB Materials Inc 2360 Corporate Circle. Suite 400 Website: www.albmaterials.com Henderson, NV 89074-7739 E-mail: [email protected] ALB Rare Earth Materials Products List Item No. Product Name Formula CAS# Purity ALB-AL2113 Scandium (2%)- Aluminum Master Alloy (Sc-Al) Sc-Al [113413-85-7] [2%Sc+98%Al] ALB-ME21 Scandium (Sc) Metal Sc [7440-20-2] [99.9%-99.999%] ALB-ME21-G Scandium (Sc) Metal Granules Sc [7440-20-2] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME21-R Scandium (Sc) Metal Rods Sc [7440-20-2] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME21-S Scandium (Sc) Metal Sheets Sc [7440-20-2] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME39 Yttrium (Y) Metal Y [7440-65-5] [99.9%-99.99%] ALB-ME39-G Yttrium (Y) Metal Granules Y [7440-65-5] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME39-R Yttrium (Y) Metal Rods Y [7440-65-5] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME39-S Yttrium (Y) Metal Sheets Y [7440-65-5] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME57 Lanthanum (La) Metal La [7439-91-0] [99%-99.95%] ALB-ME57-G Lanthanum (La) Metal Granules La [7439-91-0] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME57-R Lanthanum (La) Metal Rods La [7439-91-0] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME57-S Lanthanum (La) Metal Sheets La [7439-91-0] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME58 Cerium (Ce) Metal Ce [7440-45-1] [99%-99.9%] ALB-ME58-G Cerium (Ce) Metal Granules Ce [7440-45-1] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME58-R Cerium (Ce) Metal Rods Ce [7440-45-1] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME58-S Cerium (Ce) Metal Sheets Ce [7440-45-1] [99%, 99.9%REM] ALB-ME59 Praseodymium (Pr) Metal Pr [7440-10-0] [99%-99.9%] ALB-ME59-G Praseodymium (Pr) Metal Granules Pr [7440-10-0] [99.9%, 99.99%REM] ALB-ME59-R Praseodymium (Pr) Metal Rods Pr [7440-10-0]
    [Show full text]
  • Zirconia-Ceria-Yttria-Based Mixed Oxide and Process for Producing The
    (19) TZZ_ _Z_T (11) EP 1 921 044 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C01G 25/00 (2006.01) B01J 23/10 (2006.01) 28.02.2018 Bulletin 2018/09 B01D 53/94 (2006.01) B01J 21/06 (2006.01) B01J 35/10 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 07118246.3 (22) Date of filing: 10.10.2007 (54) Zirconia-ceria-yttria-based mixed oxide and process for producing the same Auf Zirkonium-Cerium-Yttrium basierendes Mischoxid und Herstellungsverfahren dafür Oxyde mixte à base de zirconium-cérium-yttrium et son procédé de fabrication (84) Designated Contracting States: • Kodama, Hiroshi DE FR GB Osaka 5590025 (JP) (30) Priority: 12.10.2006 JP 2006305934 (74) Representative: Manley, Nicholas Michael 08.08.2007 JP 2007206394 WP Thompson 8th Floor (43) Date of publication of application: 1 Mann Island 14.05.2008 Bulletin 2008/20 Liverpool L3 1BP (GB) (73) Proprietor: Daiichi Kigenso Kagaku Kogyo Co., (56) References cited: Ltd. EP-A- 1 006 081 EP-A- 1 035 074 Osaka-shi, EP-A- 1 894 620 WO-A-2007/093593 Osaka 559-0025 (JP) JP-A- 2003 277 059 US-B1- 6 387 338 (72) Inventors: • Okamoto, Hiroshi Osaka 5590025 (JP) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. Notice of opposition shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of ALTERNATIVES Public Version
    ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES Public Version Legal name of applicant(s): Caffaro Brescia S.r.l. Submitted by: Caffaro Brescia S.r.l. Substance: Sodium dichromate Use title: Use of sodium dichromate as an additive for suppressing parasitic reactions and oxygen evolution, pH buffering and cathode corrosion protection in the electrolytic manufacture of sodium chlorite Use number: 1 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd, with reasonable skill, care and diligence under a contract to the client and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the contract. Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd will accept no responsibility towards the client and third parties in respect of any matters outside the scope of the contract. This report has been prepared for the client and we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of the report to third parties. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Note This public version of the Analysis of Alternatives includes some redacted text. The letters indicated within each piece of redacted text correspond to the type of justification for confidentiality claims which is included as an Annex (Section 7) in the complete version of the document. Table of contents 1 Summary..............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Use applied for................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Tompbnents of Fission and 'Natural Radioactivity Found in Water Are
    DOCUMENT RESUME,, A ED '170 1110 SE027 bill. 0 AUTHOR Thatcher, L.L. ;And Others 1 TITLE Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United. States' Geblogical.Survey. Book 5, Laboratory, Analysis. Chapter- A5, Methodscr Dete-rmination of - Radioactive Substances in Water and Fluvial Sediments. INSTITUTION -Geological Survey (Dept,: .of Interior) ,Reston, PUB DATE 77 NO Tr 95p. ;For related document, see ED 131 218 AVAILABLE FRQM Super.intendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Off /ce , Washington, D.C. -20402(Stock Number 024- 0.01- 02928- 6:, No price quoted) */ FDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *ChemiCal Analysis; *Geolo'gy; *LaboratorTechniques; PhYsic; Pollution; Retource Materials; S.c ence Equipment; Water Pollution control IDENTIFIERS *RadioactiveVs- Substances; *Sediments; Water Quality ABSTkACT Analytical methods for determining important , tompbnents of fission and 'natural radioactivity found in water are reportedThe discussion of each method includes conditions for application of the method, a summary of the method, interferences, required apparatus, Procedures, calculations and estimation of precision. Isotopes considered are cesium-137, strontium-90, lead-210, radium-226. and 228, tritium, and carbon-714. `When two methods are in use for an isotope,- both methods are reported. Techniques for the collection and preservation of water samples to be anallze?d for radioactivity are also discuSsed.(CS) v. *********************************************************************** 4 Re. productions supplied
    [Show full text]
  • Interagency Committee on Chemical Management
    DECEMBER 14, 2018 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13-17 REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR WALKE, PETER Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Recommended Statutory Amendments or Regulatory Changes to Existing Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements that are Required to Facilitate Assessment of Risks to Human Health and the Environment Posed by Chemical Use in the State ............................................................................................................................ 5 III. Summary of Chemical Use in the State Based on Reported Chemical Inventories....... 8 IV. Summary of Identified Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Reported Chemical Inventories ........................................................................................................... 9 V. Summary of any change under Federal Statute or Rule affecting the Regulation of Chemicals in the State ....................................................................................................... 12 VI. Recommended Legislative or Regulatory Action to Reduce Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Regulated and Unregulated Chemicals of Emerging Concern ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]