DOCSLIB.ORG

Fibre Crops That Can Be Produced in EU27

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fibre Crops That Can Be Produced in EU27 “Non-food Crops-to-Industry schemes in EU27” WP1. Non-food crops D1.2 Fibre crops that can be produced in EU27 Lead beneficiary: INSTITUTE OF NATURAL FIBRES AND MEDICINAL PLANTS (INF&MP), POZNAN, POLAND Authors: Krzysztof Heller, Przemyslaw Baraniecki, Maria Talarzyck Co-beneficiaries: CRES-Center for Renewable Energy Sources Authors: Myrsini Christou, Efthymia Alexopoulou Co-beneficiaries: UNIBO – University of Bologna Authors: Andrea Monti, Lorenso Nissen February 2012 The project is a Coordinated Action supported by Grant agreement no. 227299 1 Table of contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 5 1 BANANA (Mussa spp L.) Fam. Musaceae ......................................................... 7 1.1 Plant anatomy ............................................................................... 7 1.2 Domestication and area of origin ...................................................... 8 1.3 Growing conditions ........................................................................ 9 1.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ......................................................... 9 1.5 Production-Yields ........................................................................... 9 1.6 Applications: current/potential ...................................................... 11 1.7 Restricting factors ........................................................................ 11 1.8 References .................................................................................. 12 2 FIBER FLAX (Linum usitatissimum L.) Fam. Linaceae ................................... 13 2.1 Fibre flax morphology & anatomy ................................................... 13 2.2 Area of origin and current cultivation .............................................. 16 2.3 Fibre flax growing conditions – input requirements ........................... 19 2.4 Fibre flax logistic (harvesting – handling) until industrial plant gate ... 23 2.5 Yields ......................................................................................... 24 2.6 Quality ....................................................................................... 30 2.7 Applications: current – potential .................................................... 32 2.8 Main directions of utilization of raw materials obtained from flax ....... 32 2.9 Factors restricting growth and yielding potential .............................. 35 2.10 Research gaps ............................................................................. 35 2.11 References .................................................................................. 36 Research gaps ...................................................................................... 40 3 GIANT REED (Arundo donax L.) ..................................................................... 42 3.1 Plant anatomy ............................................................................. 42 3.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................... 43 3.3 Growing conditions ...................................................................... 43 3.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ....................................................... 44 3.5 Production-Yields ......................................................................... 44 3.6 Applications: current/potential ...................................................... 44 3.7 Restricting factors and research gaps ............................................. 45 3.8 References .................................................................................. 45 4 FIBRE HEMP (Cannabis sativa L.) Fam. Cannabinaceae ................................ 47 4.1 Fibre hemp morphology and anatomy ............................................. 47 2 4.2 Area of origin and current cultivation .............................................. 49 4.3 Fibre hemp growing conditions – input requirements ........................ 50 4.4 Fibre hemp logistics (harvesting, handling) until industrial plant gate . 53 4.5 Yields ......................................................................................... 57 4.6 Quality ....................................................................................... 59 4.7 Application: current – potential ...................................................... 59 4.8 Factors restricting growth and yields .............................................. 62 4.9 Research gaps ............................................................................. 63 4.10 References .................................................................................. 64 5 KENAF (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Fam Cannabinaceae .................................. 69 5.1 Plant anatomy ............................................................................. 69 5.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................... 70 5.3 Growing conditions ...................................................................... 71 5.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ....................................................... 71 5.5 Production-Yields ......................................................................... 76 5.6 Applications: current/potential ...................................................... 79 5.7 Restricting factors ........................................................................ 82 5.8 Research gaps ............................................................................. 82 5.9 References .................................................................................. 83 6 LOOFAH (Luffa cylindrica L.) Fam: Cucurbitaceae L. ..................................... 84 6.1 Plant anatomy ............................................................................. 84 6.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................... 84 6.3 Growing conditions ...................................................................... 85 6.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ....................................................... 85 6.5 Production-Yields ......................................................................... 85 6.6 Applications: current/potential ...................................................... 86 6.7 References .................................................................................. 87 7 MISCANTHUS (Miscanthus x giganteus GREEF et DEU) ................................ 88 7.1 Plant anatomy ............................................................................. 88 7.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................... 88 7.3 Growing conditions ...................................................................... 89 7.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ....................................................... 91 7.5 Production-Yields ......................................................................... 91 7.6 Applications: current/potential ...................................................... 92 7.7 Restricting factors and research gaps ............................................. 92 7.8 References .................................................................................. 92 3 8 Nettle (Urtica dioica). Fam. Urticaceae ......................................................... 95 8.1 Nettle morphology & anatomy ....................................................... 95 8.2 Area of origin and current cultivation .............................................. 96 8.3 Growing conditions – input requirements ........................................ 96 8.4 Fibrous nettle logistic (harvesting-handling) until industrial plant gate 97 8.5 Yields ....................................................................................... 101 8.6 Quality ..................................................................................... 102 8.7 Applications: current – potential .................................................. 102 8.8 Factors restricting growth and yielding potential ............................ 104 8.9 Research gaps ........................................................................... 104 9 REED CANARY GRASS (Phalaris arundinaceae L.) ....................................... 106 9.1 Plant anatomy ........................................................................... 106 9.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................. 107 9.3 Growing conditions .................................................................... 108 9.4 Logistics: harvesting/handling ..................................................... 108 9.5 Production-Yields ....................................................................... 108 9.6 Applications: current/potential .................................................... 109 9.7 Restricting factors and research gaps ........................................... 109 9.8 References ................................................................................ 109 10 YUCCA (Yucca gloriosa L.) ....................................................................... 110 10.1 Plant anatomy ........................................................................... 110 10.2 Domestication and area of origin .................................................. 111 10.3 Growing conditions .................................................................... 111 10.4 Production-Yields ....................................................................... 111 10.5 Applications: current/potential
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eurasian Hemp Borer
    Insects that Feed on Hemp – Stem/Stalk Borer, Seed/Flower Chewer Eurasian Hemp Borer Caterpillars of the Eurasian hemp borer (Grapholita delineana) may be found in various parts of hemp plants, developing as a borer. Prior to flowering the insect develops in small stems and branches. After flowering the caterpillars may also feed on the developing seeds. (Note: This insect is also known as the hemp borer, and the Eurasian hemp moth.) The caterpillars (or larvae) are quite small, reaching a maximum size of about 6-8 mm. Younger larvae are cream colored (Fig. 1), with a dark brown head. As they become full-grown and near pupation they become orange or orange-red (Fig. 2). The stage that survives through winter outdoors is a full-grown larva found within the stems/branches or seed heads of hemp. They will transform to the pupal state in late winter/early spring and later emerge as the adult moth (Fig. 3). After mating the females lay eggs on hemp plants. Upon hatch from the egg the caterpillar attempts to tunnel into the plant, often entering at junctions of branches (Figure 4). Points where they do enter are often marked Figure 1 (top). Larva of a Eurasian hemp borer with a bit of loose frass (their sawdust-like within hemp stalk. excrement). The larvae develop within the Figure 2 (bottom). Full-grown larva of Eurasian stem/branch and the sites of injury typically hemp borer, showing the orange or reddish show a slight swelling. coloration typical of the late stage. This insect will also move into seed heads in late summer, feeding on developing seeds or causing wilting of a bud or small flower stalk that it has tunneled.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Hemp Borer
    Insects that Feed on Hemp – Stem/Stalk Borer, Leaf Chewer Eurasian Hemp Borer The Eurasian hemp borer (Grapholita delineana) is the caterpillar (larval) stage of a small moth that tunnels into stems and buds of Cannabis. (It is also known as the Eurasian hemp moth and hemp borer.) This species is presently known only to occur east of the Rocky Mountains, and is widespread in eastern Colorado. Most of the observed damage by this insect occurs when the caterpillars (larvae) tunnel into the base of developing buds, girdling the stem at the base of the bud, which then wilts and dies. Larval tunneling may also cause some stunting and distortion of stems and stalks, perhaps with some effect on yield. Damage to developing seed has also been reported. Eurasian hemp borer larva in stem at the base of a bud The Eurasian hemp borer has potential to be a significant insect pest of this crop in eastern Colorado, particularly of crops grown for pharmaceutical purposes (e.g., CBD) and seed. It also will likely become more commonly encountered in the crop as hemp cultivation continues and expands. Life History and Habits. The caterpillars are quite small, reaching a maximum size of about 6-8 mm. Early stage caterpillars are cream colored with a dark head. Last stage caterpillars have a reddish-orange coloration. The last stage larvae are much more commonly noticed than younger larvae that blend in color with the pith of the plant. Often they are noticed during harvest or when they get dislodged from plants during drying.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 39(2) December 2020 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit In this issue group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. From the Editor’s Desk.............2 Membership....................3,15 President’s Report.................4 Feature Article: Sandhill Gold: The Goldsmith BSC Facebook & Twitter..........5 Beetle (Cotalpa lanigera, Contributing to the BSC Scarabaeidae, Coleoptera) in Newsletter.......................5 the Sandhills of Southwestern Highlights of the 2020 AGM...6 Manitoba Request for Specimens...........7 Robert Wrigley & Tim Arendse......19 Carabidae from across North America; Kevin Floate Certain Paraleptophlebia and Rhithrogena (Ephemeroptera) from eastern Canada; Steve Burian Elateridae from across Canada; Project Update Scott Gilmore Project Update Spider Diversity of British Spider Diversity of British Columbia: Columbia: Almost 900 Spe- Almost 900 Species & Still Counting cies and Still Counting Robb Bennett, Darren Copley and Robb Bennett, Darren Copley and Claudia Copley..............................8 Claudia Copley........................8 New Projects 1. Warm & Comfortable within Hollow Stems, Leaf-mines and Galls: Little New Projects known habitats for Entomologists & Botanists to explore, Peter G. Kevan, 1. Warm & Comfortable within Hollow Stems, Leaf- Charlotte Coates, Patricia Nunes mines and Galls: Little known habitats for Entomol- Silva, & Marla Larson...................11
    [Show full text]
  • Warm & Comfortable Within Hollow Stems, Leaf-Mines and Galls
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada 11 Warm & Comfortable within Hollow Stems, Leaf-mines and Galls: Little known habitats for Entomologists & Botanists to explore Peter G. Kevan1, Charlotte Coates1, Patricia Nunes Silva2, & Marla Larson1 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 2 Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia, Escola Politécnica, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo, Brazil, 93022-750. There is increasing botanical interest in the endomicrometeorology of plants, mostly of flowers (Kevan 1970, 1975, 1989, 2019a, 2019b, 2020; van der Kooi et al. 2019). The phenomenon of elevated temperatures within plant structures has implications for the ef- fects of climatic warming (Kevan 2019b; Kevan et al. 2020). Of late, our attention at the University of Guelph has turned to hollow stems and fruits and the conditions that exist within those structures (Kevan 2019a, b; Kevan et al. 2020). Curiosity has led us to think about those places as arthropod habitats. Preliminary surveys in Canada (ON, MB, central AB, BC and western QC), the UK in Scotland and England, and Far Eastern Russia indicate that probably over 50% of the her- baceous flora (excluding grasses (Poacaea)) produces hollow stems. There seem to be no reviews of the phylogenetic distribution of hollowness of stems, nor of any biogeographi- cal, ecological or evolutionary overviews, but our surveys may allow some generalizations and explanatory hypotheses to be made. Sun and Frelich (2011) correlated various as- pects of growth and maturation of 25 species with morphological characteristics, including stem hollowness, in a grassland in New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the U.S
    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic Versus Introduced Species in North America
    insects Article Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic versus Introduced Species in North America Todd M. Gilligan 1,*, John W. Brown 2 and Joaquín Baixeras 3 1 USDA-APHIS-PPQ-S&T, 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA; [email protected] 3 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Carrer Catedràtic José Beltran, 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 29 August 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Simple Summary: The family Tortricidae includes approximately 11,500 species of small moths, many of which are economically important pests worldwide. A large number of tortricid species have been inadvertently introduced into North America from Eurasia, and many have the potential to inflict considerable negative economic and ecological impacts. Because native species behave differently than introduced species, it is critical to distinguish between the two. Unfortunately, this can be a difficult task. In the past, many tortricids discovered in North America were assumed to be the same as their Eurasian counterparts, i.e., Holarctic. Using DNA sequence data, morphological characters, food plants, and historical records, we analyzed the origin of 151 species of Tortricidae present in North America. The results indicate that the number of Holarctic species has been overestimated by at least 20%. We also determined that the number of introduced tortricids in North America is unexpectedly high compared other families, with tortricids accounting for approximately 23–30% of the total number of moth and butterfly species introduced to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS a SURVEY of the ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED with HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN in EASTERN COLORADO Submitted by Melissa
    THESIS A SURVEY OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED WITH HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN IN EASTERN COLORADO Submitted by Melissa Schreiner Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Whitney Cranshaw Frank Peairs Mark Uchanski Copyright by Melissa Schreiner 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A SURVEY OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED WITH HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN IN EASTERN COLORADO Industrial hemp was found to support a diverse complex of arthropods in the surveys of hemp fields in eastern Colorado. Seventy-three families of arthropods were collected from hemp grown in eight counties in Colorado in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Other important groups found in collections were of the order Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hemiptera. The arthropods present in fields had a range of association with the crop and included herbivores, natural enemies, pollen feeders, and incidental species. Hemp cultivars grown for seed and fiber had higher insect species richness compared to hemp grown for cannabidiol (CBD). This observational field survey of hemp serves as the first checklist of arthropods associated with the crop in eastern Colorado. Emerging key pests of the crop that are described include: corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)), hemp russet mite (Aculops cannibicola (Farkas)), cannabis aphid (Phorodon cannabis (Passerini)), and Eurasian hemp borer (Grapholita delineana (Walker)). Local outbreaks of several species of grasshoppers were observed and produced significant crop injury, particularly twostriped grasshopper (Melanoplus bivittatus (Say)). Approximately half (46%) of the arthropods collected in sweep net samples during the three year sampling period were categorized as predators, natural enemies of arthropods.
    [Show full text]
  • 07-0056A Review
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 28, No. 4: 291-296, October 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2012.28.4.291 Short communication A Review of the Genus Grapholita (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in North Korea Bong-Kyu Byun1,*, Bong-Woo Lee2, Kwan-Ho Bae3, Kyung-Jae Lee4 1Department of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Hannam University, Daejeon 305-811, Korea 2Division of Forest Biodiversity, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon 487-821, Korea 3School of Ecological and Environmental System, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 742-711, Korea 4Forest Practice Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute, Pocheon 487-821, Korea ABSTRACT In North Korea, the first report of the family Tortricidae, comprising 34 species, was made in 1969. It includes three species of the genus Grapholita (G. inopinata, G. molesta, and G. turionana). Among them, G. turionana is now placed under the genus Blastesthia. In the present study, a total of four species of the genus Grapholita are recognized from North Korea, based on material deposited in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Hungary. Of them, Grapholita molesta (Busck), is reported for the first time from North Korea. In the present study, G. inopinata was not found. All the known species are enumerated with illustrations of adults and genitalia. Also a key for the genus is given. Keywords: Grapholita, Tortricidae, Lepidoptera, taxonomy, Korea INTRODUCTION from Korea, based on the material Czech Academy of Sci- ences, Prague, Czech Republic (CAS). Byun et al. (1998) Genus Grapholita was established by Treitschke in 1829 enumerated 350 species of Korean Tortricidae, citing 63 spec- based on Tortrix lunulana [Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775, ies of Tortricinae and 40 species of Olethreutinae which had and is comprised of more than 125 described species world- been identified in North Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from the Midwestern USA
    Zootaxa 3755 (3): 287–294 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.3.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C5F4A01-550D-42DB-A236-61BCC105C286 A new species of Grapholita Treitschke (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from the midwestern USA TERRY L. HARRISON1,4, LORAN D. GIBSON2 & TODD M. GILLIGAN3 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 22727 Running Creek Drive, Florence, Kentucky 41042. E-mail: [email protected] 3Colorado State University, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Abstract Grapholita orbexilana, new species, is described from Illinois, Kentucky, and Ohio, USA. The larvae feed exclusively on Orbexilum onobrychis (Fabaceae), a plant of conservation interest in the Midwest. The moth is univoltine; its complete annual life cycle is detailed. Adult morphology readily distinguishes G. orbexilana from all other midwestern species of Grapholita; diagnostic information is provided. Observations on morphology, larval host plant preference, and pheromone attraction are presented to support the assignment of G. orbexilana to the jungiella species group of the subgenus Gra- pholita. Key words: Conservation, life history, microlepidoptera, Olethreutinae, Orbexilum onobrychis, pheromone attraction, re- stricted habitat, taxonomy Introduction The genus Grapholita Treitschke (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) comprises about 130 described species worldwide (Brown 2005, Gilligan et al. 2012). The majority of described species occur in the Holarctic; however, this might reflect lack of collecting and taxonomic study in other regions (particularly the Neotropical and Afrotropical regions) rather than actual paucity of Grapholita species in those areas (Rota and Brown 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Insect Pest Management Systems for Hemp in the United States
    applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" Journal of Integrated Pest Management, (2019) 10(1): 26; 1–10 doi: 10.1093/jipm/pmz023 Profile Developing Insect Pest Management Systems for Hemp in the United States: A Work in Progress Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article-abstract/10/1/26/5555744 by Colorado State University user on 08 January 2020 Whitney Cranshaw,1,5 Melissa Schreiner,1 Kadie Britt,2 Thomas P. Kuhar,2, John McPartland,3 and Jerome Grant4 1Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, 2Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, 3Family Medicine Department, University of Vermont College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, 4Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, and 5Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Carlos Bogran Received 9 April 2019; Editorial decision 2 July 2019 Abstract Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is now being grown within the United States over a much broader geographic area and for different uses than during its last period of significant production that ended after World War II. Within the past 3 yr, a large number of arthropod species have been documented to feed on hemp in the United States. Among key pest species, corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has demonstrated greatest potential for crop injury, being particularly damaging to flower buds. Hemp russet mite,Aculops cannibicola (Farkas), and cannabis aphid, Phorodon cannabis Passerini, are the two species observed most damaging among those that suck plant fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name Proposal
    3 Park Place, Suite 307 Phone: 301-731-4535 [email protected] Annapolis, MD 21401-3722 USA Fax: 301-731-4538 www.entsoc.org Entomological Society of America Proposal Form for New Common Name or Change of ESA-Approved Common Name Complete this form and e-mail to [email protected]. Submissions will not be considered unless this form is filled out completely. The proposer is expected to be familiar with the rules, recommendations, and procedures outlined in the “Use and Submission of Common Names” on the ESA website at https://www.entsoc.org/pubs/use-and-submission-common-names. 1. Proposed new common name: Eurasian hemp borer 2. Previously approved common name (if any): None 3. Scientific name (genus, species, author): Grapholita delineana (Walker) Order: Lepidoptera Family: Tortricidae Supporting Information 4. Please provide a clear and convincing explanation for why a common name is needed, possibly including but not limited to the taxon’s economic, ecological, or medical importance, striking appearance, abundance, or conservation status: Production of crops derived from the plant Cannabis sativa has a long, and complicated, history in North America. It was grown extensively by the English colonies and later culture extended nearly a century and a half following the establishment of the United States of America, primarily for fiber production. However, because of the use of certain cultivars for production of marijuana, highly restrictive drug laws enacted in the 1930s subsequently prohibited any legal production of Cannabis sativa, except for a brief period during World War II as hemp* grown for fiber. This situation has changed dramatically in recent years since language in the 2014 Farm Bill enabled production under certain regulated conditions and it is presently being legally grown on tens of thousands of acres across the Continental U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecosystems Entomology Project Research Reports
    Agroecosystems Entomology Lab Research Summary 2020 West Central Research Extension and Education Center North Platte, Nebraska Contents Introduction: Agroecosystems Entomology Lab . 3 Project # 1: Chemigation efficacy and spray deposition on corn for the control of western bean cutworm . 4 Project #2: Insecticide application on western bean cutworm eggs and response of predators to treated eggs . 6 Project #3: Investigating the Role of Spiders in Integrated Pest Management for Biological Control of Nebraska Crop Pests . 9 Project #4: Modeling the potential global geographic distribution of Striacosta albicosta using MaxEnt . 12 Project #5: Diversity and abundance of arthropods in industrial hemp fields of Nebraska . .14 2 Agroecosystems Entomology Lab The Agroecosystems Entomology Lab, located at the West Central Research & Extension Center, pursues research questions addressing the ecology and management of agricultural pests with an emphasis on practical applications for integrated pest management in field crops. Research projects may address a variety of themes, such as food web dynamics, insect behavior, compatibility of pest control strategies (including biological control by natural enemies), and resistance management. Research will support extension programming to develop proactive educational programs in IPM of arthropod pests of field crops grown in west central Nebraska. Julie A. Peterson, Ph.D. Associate Professor & Extension Specialist University of Nebraska–Lincoln Department of Entomology West Central Research & Extension Center 402 West State Farm Road North Platte, NE 69101 Office Phone: 308-696-6704 Twitter: @PetersonInsects Agroecosystems Entomology Lab & Western Bean Cutworm Central Webpage 3 Project #1: Chemigation efficacy and spray deposition on corn for the control of western bean cutworm Authors: Andrea Rilaković, Poliana S.
    [Show full text]