DOCSLIB.ORG

Revista Inclusiones Dra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revista Inclusiones Dra CUERPO DIRECTIVO COMITÉ EDITORIAL Directora Dra. Carolina Aroca Toloza Mg. © Carolina Cabezas Cáceres Universidad de Chile, Chile Universidad de Los Andes, Chile Dr. Jaime Bassa Mercado Subdirector Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile Dr. Andrea Mutolo Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de Dra. Heloísa Bellotto México, México Universidad de Sao Paulo, Brasil Dr. Juan Guillermo Mansilla Sepúlveda Universidad Católica de Temuco, Chile Dra. Nidia Burgos Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina Editor Drdo. Juan Guillermo Estay Sepúlveda Mg. María Eugenia Campos Universidad de Los Lagos, Chile Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Editor Científico Dr. Luiz Alberto David Araujo Dr. Lancelot Cowie Pontificia Universidad Católica de Sao Paulo, Universidad West Indies, Trinidad y Tobago Brasil Lic. Juan Donayre Córdova Cuerpo Asistente Universidad Alas Peruanas, Perú Traductora Inglés Dr. Francisco José Francisco Carrera Lic. Pauline Corthorn Escudero Universidad de Valladolid, España 221 B Web Sciences, Chile Mg. Keri González Traductora: Portugués Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de Lic. Elaine Cristina Pereira Menegón México, México 221 B Web Sciences, Chile Dr. Pablo Guadarrama González Portada Universidad Central de Las Villas, Cuba Sr. Felipe Maximiliano Estay Guerrero 221 B Web Sciences, Chile Mg. Amelia Herrera Lavanchy Universidad de La Serena, Chile Dr. Aleksandar Ivanov Katrandzhiev Universidad Suroeste Neofit Rilski, Bulgaria Mg. Cecilia Jofré Muñoz Universidad San Sebastián, Chile Mg. Mario Lagomarsino Montoya Dra. Leticia Celina Velasco Jáuregui Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente ITESO, México Dr. Claudio Llanos Reyes Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile COMITÉ CIENTÍFICO INTERNACIONAL Dr. Werner Mackenbach Comité Científico Internacional de Honor Universidad de Potsdam, Alemania Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Dr. Adolfo A. Abadía Universidad ICESI, Colombia Mg. Rocío del Pilar Martínez Marín Universidad de Santander, Colombia Dr. Carlos Antonio Aguirre Rojas Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Ph. D. Natalia Milanesio Universidad de Houston, Estados Unidos Dr. Martino Contu Universidad de Sassari, Italia Dra. Patricia Virginia Moggia Münchmeyer Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile Dr. Luiz Alberto David Araujo Pontificia Universidad Católica de Sao Paulo, Brasil Ph. D. Maritza Montero Dra. Patricia Brogna Universidad Central de Venezuela, Venezuela Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Mg. Julieta Ogaz Sotomayor Dr. Horacio Capel Sáez Universidad de Los Andes, Chile Universidad de Barcelona, España Mg. Liliana Patiño Dra. Isabel Cruz Ovalle de Amenabar Archiveros Red Social, Argentina Universidad de Los Andes, Chile Dr. Rodolfo Cruz Vadillo Dra. Eleonora Pencheva Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Universidad Suroeste Neofit Rilski, Bulgaria Puebla, México Dra. Rosa María Regueiro Ferreira Dr. Adolfo Omar Cueto Universidad de La Coruña, España Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Argentina Mg. David Ruete Zúñiga Dr. Miguel Ángel de Marco Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello, Chile Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Dr. Andrés Saavedra Barahona Dra. Emma de Ramón Acevedo Universidad San Clemente de Ojrid de Sofía, Bulgaria Universidad de Chile, Chile Dr. Efraín Sánchez Cabra Dr. Gerardo Echeita Sarrionandia Academia Colombiana de Historia, Colombia Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España Dra. Mirka Seitz Dra. Patricia Galeana Universidad del Salvador, Argentina Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Dra. Manuela Garau Dr. Manuel Alves da Rocha Centro Studi Sea, Italia Universidade Católica de Angola Angola Mg. Arnaldo Rodríguez Espinoza Dr. Carlo Ginzburg Ginzburg Universidad Estatal a Distancia, Costa Rica Scuola Normale Superiore de Pisa, Italia Universidad de California Los Ángeles, Dr. Miguel Rojas Mix Estados Unidos Coordinador la Cumbre de Rectores Universidades Estatales América Latina y el Caribe Dr. José Manuel González Freire Universidad de Colima, México Dr. Luis Alberto Romero CONICET / Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Dra. Antonia Heredia Herrera Universidad Internacional de Andalucía, España Dra. Maura de la Caridad Salabarría Roig Dilemas Contemporáneos, México Dr. Eduardo Gomes Onofre Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brasil Dr. Adalberto Santana Hernández Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Dra. Blanca Estela Zardel Jacobo México Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Dr. Juan Antonio Seda Dr. Miguel León-Portilla Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Dr. Miguel Ángel Mateo Saura Dr. Saulo Cesar Paulino e Silva Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses “don Juan Universidad de Sao Paulo, Brasil Manuel”, España Dr. Miguel Ángel Verdugo Alonso Dr. Carlos Tulio da Silva Medeiros Universidad de Salamanca, España Diálogos en MERCOSUR, Brasil Dr. Josep Vives Rego Dr. Álvaro Márquez-Fernández Universidad de Barcelona, España Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela Dr. Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni Dr. Antonio-Carlos Pereira Menaut Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Universidad Santiago de Compostela, España Comité Científico Internacional Dr. José Sergio Puig Espinosa Dilemas Contemporáneos, México Mg. Paola Aceituno Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Chile Dra. Francesca Randazzo Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Ph. D. María José Aguilar Idañez Honduras Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, España Mg. Elian Araujo Dra. Yolanda Ricardo Universidad de Mackenzie, Brasil Universidad de La Habana, Cuba Mg. Rumyana Atanasova Popova Dr. Patricio Quiroga Universidad Suroeste Neofit Rilski, Bulgaria Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile Dra. Ana Bénard da Costa Dr. Gino Ríos Patio Instituto Universitario de Lisboa, Portugal Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Per Centro de Estudios Africanos, Portugal Dr. Carlos Manuel Rodríguez Arrechavaleta Dra. Alina Bestard Revilla Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y México, México el Deporte, Cuba Dra. Noemí Brenta Dra. Vivian Romeu Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, México Ph. D. Juan R. Coca Universidad de Valladolid, España Dra. María Laura Salinas Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Argentina Dr. Antonio Colomer Vialdel Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, España Dr. Stefano Santasilia Universidad della Calabria, Italia Dr. Christian Daniel Cwik Universidad de Colonia, Alemania Mg. Silvia Laura Vargas López Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Dr. Eric de Léséulec Morelos, México INS HEA, Francia Dra. Jaqueline Vassallo Dr. Andrés Di Masso Tarditti Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina Universidad de Barcelona, España Dr. Evandro Viera Ouriques Ph. D. Mauricio Dimant Universidad Federal de Río de Janeiro, Brasil Universidad Hebrea de Jerusalén, Israel Dra. María Luisa Zagalaz Sánchez Dr. Jorge Enrique Elías Caro Universidad de Jaén, España Universidad de Magdalena, Colombia Dra. Maja Zawierzeniec Dra. Claudia Lorena Fonseca Universidad de Varsovia, Polonia Universidad Federal de Pelotas, Brasil Dr. Francisco Luis Giraldo Gutiérrez Editorial Cuadernos de Sofía Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, 221 B Web Sciences Colombia Santiago – Chile Revista Inclusiones Dra. Carmen González y González de Mesa Representante Legal Universidad de Oviedo, España Juan Guillermo Estay Sepúlveda Editorial Mg. Luis Oporto Ordóñez Universidad Mayor San Andrés, Bolivia Indización y Bases de Datos Académicas Revista Inclusiones, se encuentra indizada en: Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals CATÁLOGO REVISTA INCLUSIONES ISSN 0719-4706 VOLUMEN 5 – NÚMERO ESPECIAL – ABRIL/JUNIO 2018 PH. D. VALENTÍN KITANOV REVISTA INCLUSIONES ISSN 0719-4706 VOLUMEN 5 – NÚMERO ESPECIAL – ABRIL/JUNIO 2018 PH. D. VALENTÍN KITANOV REVISTA INCLUSIONES ISSN 0719-4706 VOLUMEN 5 – NÚMERO ESPECIAL – ABRIL/JUNIO 2018 ISSN 0719-4706 - Volumen 5 / Número Especial / Abril – Junio 2018 pp. 26-42 THE UNSHARED ROAD OF CONFLICT OR ONE WAR LESS IN THE BALKANS (HISTORICAL READING OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE PRINCIPALITY OF BULGARIA OF 1904) EL CAMINO NO COMPARTIDO DEL CONFLICTO O UNA GUERRA MENOS EN LOS BALCANES. (LA LECTURA HISTÓRICA DEL ACUERDO ENTRE EL IMPERIO OTOMANO Y EL PRINCIPADO DE BULGARIA EN 1904) Ph. D. Valentín Kitanov South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Bulgaria [email protected] Fecha de Recepción: 19 de marzo de 2018 – Fecha de Aceptación: 30 de marzo de 2018 Resumen En 1903, El Imperio Otomano y El Principado de Bulgaria se enfrentan al riesgo de un conflicto militar entre ellos. Éste conflicto es provocado por la tensión en la “cuestión Macedonia”. Gracias a las actividades diplomáticas de ambos países, la tensión es superada y la colisión militar quda paralizada. El mérito principal de etas negociaciones lo tienen por el lado búlgaro Grigor Nachovich, agente diplomático en Constantinopla y por el lado turco, Zeki Pasha, un ayudante del Sultán otomano y jefe de artillería junto a Sayid Pasha, presidente del Consejo de Estado. El acuerdo búlgaro-turco fue firmado el 26 de marzo de 1904 e incluye los compromisos para ambos países de las propuestas de la diplomacia europea. El acuerdo es aprobado por los "grandes poderes" , que aspiran no alterar el status quo en los Balcanes en este momento. Palabras Claves ”La custión de Macedonia – IMRO – Acuerdo Búlgaro-Turco – Grandes potencias – Diplomacia europea Península de los Balcanes – Principado de Bulgaria Abstract In 1903 the Ottoman Empire and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vladimir Paounovsky
    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities
    BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 21st -Century Studies in Humanities Editor: Pál Fodor Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY Editors GÁBOR DEMETER CSABA KATONA PENKA PEYKOVSKA Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 Technical editor: Judit Lakatos Language editor: David Robert Evans Translated by: Jason Vincz, Bálint Radó, Péter Szőnyi, and Gábor Demeter Lectored by László Bíró (HAS RCH, senior research fellow) The volume was supported by theBulgarian–Hungarian History Commission and realized within the framework of the project entitled “Peripheries of Empires and Nation States in the 17th–20th Century Central and Southeast Europe. Power, Institutions, Society, Adaptation”. Supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NKFI-EPR K 113004, East-Central European Nationalisms During the First World War NKFI FK 128 978 Knowledge, Lanscape, Nation and Empire ISBN: 978-963-416-198-1 (Institute of History – Research Center for the Humanities) ISBN: 978-954-2903-36-9 (Institute for Historical Studies – BAS) HU ISSN 2630-8827 Cover: “A Momentary View of Europe”. German caricature propaganda map, 1915. Published by the Research Centre for the Humanities Responsible editor: Pál Fodor Prepress preparation: Institute of History, RCH, Research Assistance Team Leader: Éva Kovács Cover design: Bence Marafkó Page layout: Bence Marafkó Printed in Hungary by Prime Rate Kft., Budapest CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 Zoltán Oszkár Szőts and Gábor Demeter THE CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK OF WORLD WAR I AND THEIR REPRESENTATION IN SERBIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY .................................. 25 Krisztián Csaplár-Degovics ISTVÁN TISZA’S POLICY TOWARDS THE GERMAN ALLIANCE AND AGAINST GERMAN INFLUENCE IN THE YEARS OF THE GREAT WAR................................
    [Show full text]
  • About Bulgaria
    Source: Zone Bulgaria (http://en.zonebulgaria.com/) About Bulgaria General Information about Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country in Southeastern Europe and is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. To the north the country borders Rumania, to the east – the Black Sea, to the south – Turkey and Greece, and to the west – Yugoslavia and Macedonia. Bulgaria is a parliamentary republic with a National Assembly (One House Parliament) of 240 national representatives. The President is Head of State. Geography of Bulgaria The Republic of Bulgaria covers a territory of 110 993 square kilometres. The average altitude of the country is 470 metres above sea level. The Stara Planina Mountain occupies central position and serves as a natural dividing line from the west to the east. It is a 750 km long mountain range stretching from the Vrushka Chuka Pass to Cape Emine and is part of the Alpine-Himalayan mountain range. It reaches the Black Sea to the east and turns to the north along the Bulgarian-Yugoslavian border. A natural boundary with Romania is the Danube River, which is navigable all along for cargo and passenger vessels. The Black Sea is the natural eastern border of Bulgaria and its coastline is 378 km long. There are clearly cut bays, the biggest two being those of Varna and Bourgas. About 25% of the coastline are covered with sand and hosts our seaside resorts. The southern part of Bulgaria is mainly mountainous. The highest mountain is Rila with Mt. Moussala being the highest peak on the Balkan Peninsula (2925 m). The second highest and the mountain of most alpine character in Bulgaria is Pirin with its highest Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Defense Division
    Order Code RS21855 Updated October 16, 2007 Greece Update Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Defense Division Summary The conservative New Democracy party won reelection in September 2007. Kostas Karamanlis, its leader, remained prime minister and pledged to continue free-market economic reforms to enhance growth and create jobs. The government’s foreign policy focuses on the European Union (EU), relations with Turkey, reunifying Cyprus, resolving a dispute with Macedonia over its name, other Balkan issues, and relations with the United States. Greece has assisted with the war on terrorism, but is not a member of the coalition in Iraq. This report will be updated if developments warrant. See also CRS Report RL33497, Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations and Related Issues, by Carol Migdalovitz. Government and Politics Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis called for early parliamentary elections to be held on September 16, 2007, instead of in March 2008 as otherwise scheduled, believing that his government’s economic record would ensure easy reelection. In August, however, Greece experienced severe and widespread wildfires, resulting in 76 deaths and 270,000 hectares burned. The government attempted to deflect attention from what was widely viewed as its ineffective performance in combating the fires by blaming the catastrophe on terrorists, without proof, and by providing generous compensation for victims. This crisis came on top of a scandal over the state pension fund’s purchase of government bonds at inflated prices. Under these circumstances, Karamanlis’s New Democracy party’s (ND) ability to win of a slim majority of 152 seats in the unicameral 300-seat parliament and four more years in office was viewed as a victory.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940
    Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Open Jerusalem Edited by Vincent Lemire (Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée University) and Angelos Dalachanis (French School at Athens) VOLUME 1 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/opje Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Opening New Archives, Revisiting a Global City Edited by Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire LEIDEN | BOSTON Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. The Open Jerusalem project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) (starting grant No 337895) Note for the cover image: Photograph of two women making Palestinian point lace seated outdoors on a balcony, with the Old City of Jerusalem in the background. American Colony School of Handicrafts, Jerusalem, Palestine, ca. 1930. G. Eric and Edith Matson Photograph Collection, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mamcol.054/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Dalachanis, Angelos, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • A View of the History of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
    A VIEW OF THE HISTORY OF THE ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE Prof. Dr. Nuran Yıldırım The Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, the Department of History of Medicine and Ethics Attributing the roots of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine to the Fatih Darüşşifa after a great deal of discussion, the 500th anniversary of medical education in Istanbul was celebrated in 1970. The soundest documents showing that medical education was carried out in the Fatih Dârüşşifa were the appointment papers (rüus) of medical students for the dârüşşifa in the 60 years between 1723 and 1783. These nine rüus, which were recently published, clarify that there were positions for six medical students in the dârüşşifa, and that whenever a vacancy came up, a new medical student would be appointed by the chief physician to undergo a systematic medical training. 1-Archival document concerning Ismail Efendi‟s appointment in place of Derviş Mehmet in Fatih Darüşşifa after his death. With the opening of the Süleymaniye Medical Medrese, medical education in Istanbul, which had started with the Fatih Dârüşşifa, became institutionalized. The opening of a medical medrese for the first time in the Ottoman State is accepted as being an important step in our history of medical education. The Süleymaniye Medical Medrese (Süleymaniye Tıp Medresesi) was a medrese for specializing, or a “post-graduate” course, as only students who had completed their classic medrese education could continue. Not only did the physicians that were trained join the scholarly classes, but at the same time they could be qadi or rising even to the level of sheikh-ul-Islam or grand vizier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]