DOCSLIB.ORG

1 065 604 64,84% 969 265 53,82% 1 643 489 1 801

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 065 604 64,84% 969 265 53,82% 1 643 489 1 801 Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w trzecim kwartale 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p. pasażerów udział l.p. pasażerów udział Enter Air 1 515 962 31,39% 1 503 167 27,94% Travel Service AS 2 288 002 17,52% 2 247 492 13,74% Small Planet Airlines 3 120 402 7,33% 7 73 908 4,10% Bingo Airways 4 116 999 7,12% – – – Travel Service Polska 5 111 782 6,80% – – – OLT Express Poland 6 81 544 4,96% – – – SprintAir 7 63 828 3,88% 55 181 0,01% Nouvelair Tunisie 8 59 087 3,60% 18 24 145 1,34% Pegasus Airlines 9 54 818 3,34% – – – LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT 10 52 980 3,22% 3 171 619 9,53% Air Cairo 11 26 925 1,64% 5 90 147 5,01% Nesma 12 22 111 1,35% 16 28 709 1,59% Bulgarian Air Charter 13 21 657 1,32% 14 31 449 1,75% Sky Airlines 14 21 616 1,32% 15 30 126 1,67% Corendon Airlines 15 17 787 1,08% 13 32 708 1,82% Aegean Airlines 16 12 443 0,76% 17 27 217 1,51% FreeBird Airlines 17 10 491 0,64% 24 2 792 0,16% Air Arabia 18 7 453 0,45% – – – Syphax Airlines 19 6 755 0,41% – – – Onur Air 20 4 809 0,29% 9 59 401 3,30% Air Onix 21 3 264 0,20% – – – Air Malta 22 2 813 0,17% 22 3 832 0,21% Arkia Israeli Airlines 23 2 367 0,14% 21 4 057 0,23% Sprintair Cargo 24 1 954 0,12% – – – Spanair 25 1 665 0,10% 26 2 231 0,12% Pozostali przewoźnicy 13 975 0,85% 467 877 25,98% Przewoźnicy polscy* 1 065 604 64,84% 969 265 53,82% SUMA 1 643 489 1 801 058 Źródło: Opracowanie ULC na podstawie informacji uzyskanych z portów lotniczych, Warszawa, czerwiec 2013 *Przewoźnicy polscy: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, Bingo Airways, Travel Service Polska, OLT Express Poland, SprintAir, LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT, Sprintair Cargo, OLT Express Regional, Sky Taxi, Bartolini Air, Excel Handling Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w trzech kwartałach 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p. pasażerów udział l.p. pasażerów udział Enter Air 1 880 479 30,65% 1 778 305 27,16% Travel Service AS 2 528 188 18,39% 2 449 858 15,70% Small Planet Airlines 3 211 318 7,36% 7 106 067 3,70% OLT Express Poland 4 188 577 6,57% – – – Travel Service Polska 5 147 760 5,14% – – – Bingo Airways 6 134 962 4,70% – – – Nouvelair Tunisie 7 98 099 3,42% 19 37 286 1,30% LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT 8 94 535 3,29% 3 247 606 8,64% Air Cairo 9 83 587 2,91% 6 123 228 4,30% SprintAir 10 82 065 2,86% 62 398 0,01% Pegasus Airlines 11 80 813 2,81% – – – Nesma 12 42 743 1,49% 16 43 303 1,51% Sky Airlines 13 40 942 1,43% 12 52 275 1,82% Yes Airways 14 28 674 1,00% 4 196 880 6,87% Corendon Airlines 15 28 419 0,99% 15 47 052 1,64% Bulgarian Air Charter 16 26 285 0,92% 18 38 511 1,34% Aegean Airlines 17 18 309 0,64% 17 38 970 1,36% Air Arabia 18 10 965 0,38% – – – Arkia Israeli Airlines 19 10 895 0,38% 23 10 804 0,38% FreeBird Airlines 20 10 841 0,38% 29 3 636 0,13% EL AL Israel Airlines 21 8 634 0,30% 21 13 501 0,47% Israir 22 8 054 0,28% 27 4 689 0,16% Syphax Airlines 23 7 296 0,25% – – – Onur Air 24 5 412 0,19% 9 90 064 3,14% Thomas Cook Airlines Belgium 25 4 203 0,15% 38 1 418 0,05% Pozostali przewoźnicy 90 360 3,15% 582 244 20,31% Przewoźnicy polscy* 1 480 131 51,53% 1 772 178 61,83% SUMA 2 872 415 2 866 095 Źródło: Opracowanie ULC na podstawie informacji uzyskanych z portów lotniczych, Warszawa, czerwiec 2013 *Przewoźnicy polscy: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, OLT Express Poland, Travel Service Polska, Bingo Airways, LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT, SprintAir, Yes Airways, Sprintair Cargo, Air Poland, EuroLOT, Sky Taxi, Polish Air Force, OLT Express Regional, Excel Handling, Bartolini Air, .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C 137 of the European Union
    Official Journal C 137 of the European Union Volume 57 English edition Information and Notices 7 May 2014 Contents II Information INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2014/C 137/01 Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7200 — Lenovo/IBM x86 Server Business) (1) .... 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2014/C 137/02 Euro exchange rates ..................................................................................... 2 2014/C 137/03 Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 18 January 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M. 6570 — UPS/TNT Express — Rapporteur: Austria ........... 3 2014/C 137/04 Final Report of the Hearing Officer — UPS/TNT Express (COMP/M.6570) ............................. 4 2014/C 137/05 Summary of Commission Decision of 30 January 2013 declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.6570 — UPS/TNT Express) (notified under document C(2013) 431 final) (1) .................................................. 8 EN (1) Text with EEA relevance 2014/C 137/06 Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union for products in the poultrymeat, egg and egg albumin sectors .................................. 18 NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES 2014/C 137/07 Publication of decisions by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (recast) (1) .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Monitor the EUROCONTROL Bulletin on Air Transport Trends
    Issue N°140. 07/05/12 Industry Monitor The EUROCONTROL bulletin on air transport trends European flights decreased by 2.7% in March. The charter segment continued to recover from EUROCONTROL statistics and forecasts 1 the Egyptian and Tunisian disruptions last year Other statistics and forecasts 2 and was up 11%. Passenger airlines 2 IATA reported an increase of 8.8% in demand in Environment 6 March 2012 for passenger traffic in Europe Oil 7 whereas freight traffic was down 2.2% on March 2011. Airports 7 Aircraft Manufacturing 8 Delta is the first airline to buy an oil refinery in an attempt to cut fuel costs by €230 million a Regulation 8 year. Cargo 9 Oil prices down to 91€/barrel in April. Fares 9 EUROCONTROL statistics and forecasts European flights decreased by 2.7% in March on the same month of 2011, with the underlying trend slightly higher, as the figure was affected by significant strike days in Cyprus, France, Germany, Portugal and Spain (see Figure 1). The charter segment continued to recover from the Egyptian and Tunisian disruptions last year and was up 11% in March, business aviation was up 0.7% whereas traditional scheduled, low-cost and all-cargo were down -3.4%, -2% and -8% respectively (EUROCONTROL, April). Based on preliminary data for delay from all causes, 31% of flights were delayed on departure in March, a 1 percentage point decrease and a return to the low levels observed in 2011. Analysis of delay causes contributing to the average delay per flight shows a notable increase in reactionary delay, with this cause experiencing a 48% share of total delay minutes for all- causes and an increase in its contribution to the average delay per flight of 3.8 minutes, up from 3.5 minutes in March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Air Poised to Provide Technical Maintenance Services
    Warsaw, March 28, 2018 Enter Air poised to provide technical maintenance services Enter Air, Poland’s largest charter airline, has founded Enter Air Services, a company providing aircraft technical maintenance services for the carrier’s fleet. The launch of such services within the Group will generate significant savings without compromising the top quality of Enter Air’s fleet. “The provision of technical maintenance services is among the most significant components of any airline’s business and it is one of the most expensive such components. Having the Group’s own technical maintenance service provider will enable us to generate additional value for shareholders, leaving a large chunk of revenue and margin within the Enter Air Group,” says Grzegorz Polaniecki, Management Board Member and CEO of Enter Air. “We have built a technical maintenance team from scratch in roughly 9 months. We have hired the best aviation mechanics available on the market with experience acquired in recognized foreign technical maintenance service organizations. We have attracted them back to Poland where they will have stable and well-paid jobs,” - Polaniecki adds. Enter Air Services is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enter Air. Initially, the company’s technical maintenance services will be provided to Enter Air in all of the carrier’s operating bases in Poland. Ultimately, the company will provide its services also in Enter Air’s foreign bases. Enter Air expects to generate savings thanks to synergies caused by having a technical maintenance service organization within the Group. The carrier’s aircraft will be taken care of by a reliable technical maintenance team in a manner that will enable the Group to minimize risks arising from changes in rates or terms of contracts entered into with third party providers of such services.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitte Recht Familienfreundlich Am Meisten Tee Dpa HAMBURG
    DONNERSTAG, 9. AUGUST 2012 WIRTSCHAFT 7 KOMPAKT Ostfriesen trinken Bitte recht familienfreundlich am meisten Tee dpa HAMBURG. So ent- Wie die Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben zum Wettbewerbsvorteil wird spannend wie eine Tasse Tee dürften die aktuellen Von Anne Diekhoff Konsumzahlen für die Tee- industrie sein. Das Import- RHEINE/MÜNSTER. Firmen volumen hat sich 2011 um brauchen gute Mitarbeiter. knapp sechs Prozent auf Mitarbeiter brauchen Jobs, 53 768 Tonnen im Ver- die ihnen nicht das Familien- gleich zum Vorjahr erhöht. leben unnötig erschweren. Auch Exporte konnten ge- Ihre Ansprüche sind in den steigert werden: Rund vergangenen Jahren gestie- 27 196 Tonnen Tee, 4,8 Pro- gen – und diese Botschaft zent mehr als 2010, wurden hat inzwischen auch die in Deutschland veredelt. Wirtschaft erreicht. Am häufigsten brühen sich Ostfriesen eine Tasse. Nach den Sommerferien Knapp 300 Liter Schwarz- wird Birgit Saborowskis 14- tee trinkt jeder Ostfriese im jähriger Sohn mit einem neu- Schnitt pro Jahr. en Stundenplan aus der Schule kommen. Dann wird die gelernte Steuerfachange- Wieder Rückschlag stellte ihre Arbeitszeiten wie- für Spanien der anpassen, um zu Hause sein zu können, wenn der Un- dpa MADRID. Das schwer terricht ihres Jüngsten aus angeschlagene Euro-Land ist. „Kein Problem“, sagt sie, Spanien muss einen neuen und ihre Stimme verrät, dass Rückschlag verkraften. Im sie stolz auf ihren Arbeitge- Juni ist die Industriepro- ber ist, der das möglich duktion ein Stück weit stär- macht: Die Steuer- und Wirt- ker eingebrochen als be- schaftsprüfersozietät Döcker fürchtet. Das spanische Wigger Lührmann (DWL) in Statistikamt meldete ges- Rheine ist in diesem Jahr tern einen Juni-Rückgang vom Bundesfamilienministe- von 6,3 Prozent zum Vor- rium als familienfreundlichs- jahr.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport from Katowice
    Katowice International Katowice International Airport (Polish: Międzynarodowy Port Lotniczy Katowice) (IATA: KTW, ICAO: EPKT) is an international airport, located in Pyrzowice, 30 km (19 mi) north of Katowice, Poland. The airport has the fourth- biggest (second-biggest in Summer Season) passenger flow in Poland. Katowice Airport has the biggest charter passenger flow of the airports in Poland. In August 2017 this airport was the second biggest airport in Poland in passenger flow. It is also second biggest airport in the Country in Cargo traffic. Katowice Airport operates a lot of charter, regular and cargo flights. The airport is an operating base for Enter Air, Ryanair Sun, Small Planet Airlines, Smartwings, Travel Service Polska and Wizz Air. History The current location of Katowice International Airport was initially used by German soldiers. In 1940, the Luftwaffe began construction of an airbase in the meadows around Pyrzowice. The Germans built three stone and concrete airstrips, with runway lengths varying from 1000 to 1500 meters, all of which around 50 meters wide. The airbase was used for handling of military aircraft flying from the inner part of the German Reich, carrying supplies to troops on the Eastern Front. Airlines Air Cairo Air Mediterranean AlMasria Universal Airlines Astra Airlines Bulgarian Air Charter Corendon Airlines Ellinair Enter Air FlyEgypt LOT Polish Airlines Terminals The airport features three passenger terminals A, B (departures) and C (arrivals) as well as a cargo terminal. Operations at terminal B, much bigger than A, started on 30 July 2007. Terminals are capable of handling about 3.6 million passengers annually. Terminal A handles all non-Schengen departure flights, while Terminal B handles all Schengen departure flights.
    [Show full text]
  • Trzeci Kwartał 2010-2011 R
    Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu regularnym w trzecim kwartale 2010 i 2011 roku 2011 2010 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p. pasażerów udział l.p. pasażerów udział LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT 1 1 580 053 29,51% 1 1 477 736 28,42% Wizz Air 2 1 206 599 22,54% 3 1 178 310 22,66% Ryanair 3 1 116 091 20,85% 2 1 178 470 22,67% Lufthansa 4 408 929 7,64% 4 372 226 7,16% EasyJet 5 118 172 2,21% 5 157 678 3,03% Norwegian Air Shuttle 6 105 153 1,96% 6 119 348 2,30% Air France 7 82 631 1,54% 7 73 320 1,41% KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 8 69 296 1,29% 10 55 058 1,06% British Airways 9 68 692 1,28% 9 60 157 1,16% SAS 10 68 020 1,27% 8 60 517 1,16% Aer Lingus 11 49 254 0,92% 11 49 165 0,95% Swiss International Air Lines 12 45 495 0,85% 12 47 167 0,91% Austrian Airlines 13 43 006 0,80% 15 35 717 0,69% EuroLOT1 14 40 069 0,75% – – – Czech Airlines 15 39 688 0,74% 13 37 027 0,71% Aeroflot-Russian Airlines 16 39 668 0,74% 17 30 276 0,58% Finnair 17 38 594 0,72% 16 32 215 0,62% Alitalia 18 27 430 0,51% 19 21 618 0,42% Brussels Airlines 19 26 204 0,49% 20 17 985 0,35% Air Baltic 20 24 835 0,46% 30 6 722 0,13% TAP Portugal 21 20 870 0,39% 23 15 873 0,31% Turkish Airlines (THY) 22 17 986 0,34% 22 16 093 0,31% Malev 23 17 003 0,32% 21 17 280 0,33% EL AL Israel Airlines 24 13 319 0,25% 26 12 237 0,24% Aerosvit Airlines 25 12 029 0,22% 28 7 103 0,14% Pozostali przewoźnicy 74 393 1,39% 120 186 2,31% Przewoźnicy polscy* 1 629 346 30,44% 1 490 273 28,66% LCC** 2 608 294 48,72% 2 710 545 52,13% SUMA 5 353 479 5
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty
    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, July 13, 2012 Week 28
    Friday, July 13, 2012 Week 28 YOUR AERO PARTNER IN INSTRUMENTS COMPONENT & AVIONICS, INC. REPAIR The Newsletter of Record for the Aviation Industry since 1979 - ISSN 0271-2598 1,714th Issue www.speednews.com Page 1 of 10 BOEING announced 215 737 MAX orders/commitments from four leasing companies: AIR LEASE CORP for 60 737 MAX-8s and 15 737 MAX-9s (also reconfirmation rights for 25), GECAS for 75 737 MAX-8s, ALAFCO for 20 737 MAX-8s, and AVOLON for 10 737 MAX-8s and five 737 MAX-9s (reconfirmation rights for five).GECAS (25) and AVOLON (10) also agreed to order 35 737-800s. UNITED ordered 100 737 MAX-9s and 50 737-900ERs (both 180-pax) in deal valued at $14.7b; 737 program reached >10,000 orders. SKYWEST, Utah agreed to order 100 PW1200G-powered MRJs for 2017-2020. MITSUBISHI now has 230 orders/commitments. CATHAY PACIFIC agreed to order 10 Trent-powered A350-1000s, plus convert 16 of original 36 A350-900s on order to -1000s. BOMBARDIER booked a conditional order from an unidentified customer for five CS100s and 10 CS300s. It also announced that CHINA EXPRESS AIRLINES converted previously announced conditional order for six CRJ900NGs, plus five options, and AIRBALTIC signed LOI to order 10 CS300s and take 10 purchase rights. CHORUS AVIATION converted six (of 15) Q400 options. AIRASIA said that it is in CSeries order talks and finalizing negotiations with AIRBUS for 50-100 additional aircraft. CIT AEROSPACE ordered 10 more A330s, including new 240-tonne variant (see page two), and has now ordered 51 (36 delivered).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Selected Enterprises in the Aviation Industry in Romania and Poland After 1989
    Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques • No. 67 • 2020: 170 - 180 ORIGINAL PAPER From a state-owned giant to a market enterprise? The evolution of selected enterprises in the aviation industry in Romania and Poland after 1989 Andrzej Dubicki1) Abstract Year 1989 was an important turning point, not only in the political history of Poland and Romania, but also for the transport sector of both countries. Political events allowed for a thorough reconstruction of the air transport sector in both countries. Both airfleets entered the new political reality as state-owned enterprises, though with different traditions. Both countries have begun transforming their own aviation market in a similar place, with a rather outdated air fleet, with some few modern aircraft. Nevertheless, the further development of respective aviation markets took place in different ways, as long as no native competitor for LOT appeared in Poland for various reasons, the situation is somewhat different in Romania and TAROM now experiences serious competition from the low-cost carrier BlueAir. Both state-owned enterprises had to take advantage of public aid, LOT in 2012, while TAROM in 2020.Time will show whether the Romanian national carrier will be able to repeat the success of the Polish one, which after a period of recession is now able to expand on the European market.The aim of the article is to show and compare the development of the Polish and Roumanian air markets and to try to find common points of the situation created after 1989. There will be used various sources, including monographs, analysis and articles of this specific topic.
    [Show full text]