DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 January 2008 The iW ld Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation Kassia C. Randzio University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Randzio, Kassia C., "The iW ld Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation" (2008). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 142. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/142 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE May 2008 Geography THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________________ Stan Stevens, Chair ______________________________________________ Piper Gaubatz, Member ______________________________________________ Laurie Brown, Department Head Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the people of the Sky Valley and the Skykomish Ranger District employees who have allowed me to become familiar with Wild Sky, the Forest Service, and the region as a whole. This research is largely based on interviews with the many people interested in the outcome of the Wild Sky Wilderness debate, and I greatly appreciate their willingness to spend time talking with me about the proposal, public involvement, Sky Valley history, and visions for the Valley’s future. Finally, thank you to Stan Stevens and Piper Gaubatz for the many hours they have spent reading and editing my work. iii ABSTRACT THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION MAY 2008 KASSIA C. RANDZIO B.A., KENYON COLLEGE M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Directed by: Professor Stan Stevens Wild Sky, a proposed wilderness in Washington State, has been a source of local contention since its inception. Drawing on the theories of political ecology, international conservation, and actor-based politics, this research seeks to understand the process of public participation in wilderness designation, the arguments both for and against Wild Sky, and how the wilderness proposal process could be improved. The paper begins with an outline of local and public participation in Wild Sky legislation, a discussion of “community,” and an account of how the 1964 Wilderness Act has been applied nationally and locally. This is followed by an analysis of interviews conducted with Forest Service employees and many of Wild Sky’s proponents and opponents. Advocates hope Wild Sky will boost the local economy, rehabilitate salmon runs, provide increased recreational access, and preserve an ecosystem typically excluded from wilderness – lowland forests and streams. Opponents see the proposal as an elite land grab that would exclude motorized recreation and prohibit the resource extraction iv historically important in the area. They argue that the land, logged a century ago, does not qualify as wilderness. Ultimately, the Forest Service will be charged with managing the land, but the Wild Sky legislation creates management expectations that will be difficult to achieve due to recent budget cuts and environmental regulations. My research demonstrates that the lead actors in the wilderness debate have changed, with the voice of the timber industry replaced by more diverse opposition from motorized recreation. Although the Washington Congressional delegation strove to accommodate these various interests through public meetings and negotiations, the process could have been improved. Currently, the 1964 Wilderness Act does not outline a format for public involvement regarding Congressional additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. However, this legislation should offer specific opportunities for public and local participation. Most importantly, in collaboration with the Forest Service and local communities, wilderness advocates and the federal government must be prepared to offer long-term support for wilderness through budget allocations and volunteer hours in order to ensure that Wild Sky’s long-term ecological and economic benefits are achieved. KEY WORDS: Wilderness, Washington State, National Forests, Local Participation, Political Ecology, Conservation v CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iv LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.............................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: SKY........................................................................................1 The Skykomish River Valley.................................................................................10 The Northwest Forest Plan.....................................................................................22 Designating Wilderness.........................................................................................27 Thesis Structure.....................................................................................................31 2. THE PROPOSAL PROCESS................................................................................34 The Beginning of Wild Sky...................................................................................38 Index Town Meeting..............................................................................................39 Monroe and Seattle Workshops.............................................................................41 3. COMMUNITY......................................................................................................45 International Conservation.....................................................................................46 Public Involvement in the United States................................................................48 Defining Community.............................................................................................54 Participation...........................................................................................................58 Tulalip Tribes.........................................................................................................60 The Community and Conservation........................................................................62 vi 4. WILDERNESS......................................................................................................64 The Pristine-Humanized Continuum.....................................................................69 Wilderness in the Pacific Northwest......................................................................74 Indigenous Peoples and Settlers in the Sky Valley................................................79 Defining Wilderness..............................................................................................81 5. WHY WILD SKY?................................................................................................84 Habitat Protection..................................................................................................88 Flood Mitigation....................................................................................................92 Economic Benefits.................................................................................................94 6. THE OPPOSITION...............................................................................................99 Negotiation and Compromise..............................................................................100 Ideology...............................................................................................................108 7. THE FOREST SERVICE....................................................................................114 Resources and Recreation....................................................................................115 Local Concerns....................................................................................................119 Trail Construction................................................................................................123 Threatened Land..................................................................................................127 8. CONCLUSIONS: BEYOND WILD SKY.........................................................130 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................144 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal with Inset, 2002…………………………………...….2 2. Wild Sky Interview Map………………………………………………………….……7 3. The Skykomish River Valley........................................................................................11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1963 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SKYKOMISH RIVER 30- BY 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, V.A. Frizzell, Jr., D.B. Booth, R.B. Waitt, J.T. Whetten, and R.E. Zartman INTRODUCTION From the eastern-most edges of suburban Seattle, the Skykomish River quadrangle stretches east across the low rolling hills and broad river valleys of the Puget Lowland, across the forested foothills of the North Cascades, and across high meadowlands to the bare rock peaks of the Cascade crest. The quadrangle straddles parts of two major river systems, the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie Rivers, which drain westward from the mountains to the lowlands (figs. 1 and 2). In the late 19th Century mineral deposits were discovered in the Monte Cristo, Silver Creek and the Index mining districts within the Skykomish River quadrangle. Soon after came the geologists: Spurr (1901) studied base- and precious- metal deposits in the Monte Cristo district and Weaver (1912a) and Smith (1915, 1916, 1917) in the Index district. General geologic mapping was begun by Oles (1956), Galster (1956), and Yeats (1958a) who mapped many of the essential features recognized today. Areas in which additional studies have been undertaken are shown on figure 3. Our work in the Skykomish River quadrangle, the northwest quadrant of the Wenatchee 1° by 2° quadrangle, began in 1975 and is part of a larger mapping project covering the Wenatchee quadrangle (fig. 1). Tabor, Frizzell, Whetten, and Booth have primary responsibility for bedrock mapping and compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1961 Climbers Outing in the Icefield Range of the St
    the Mountaineer 1962 Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office in Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during March and December by THE MOUNTAINEERS, P. 0. Box 122, Seattle 11, Wash. Clubroom is at 523 Pike Street in Seattle. Subscription price is $3.00 per year. The Mountaineers To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of Northwest America; To make expeditions into these regions in fulfillment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all lovers of outdoor Zif e. EDITORIAL STAFF Nancy Miller, Editor, Marjorie Wilson, Betty Manning, Winifred Coleman The Mountaineers OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES Robert N. Latz, President Peggy Lawton, Secretary Arthur Bratsberg, Vice-President Edward H. Murray, Treasurer A. L. Crittenden Frank Fickeisen Peggy Lawton John Klos William Marzolf Nancy Miller Morris Moen Roy A. Snider Ira Spring Leon Uziel E. A. Robinson (Ex-Officio) James Geniesse (Everett) J. D. Cockrell (Tacoma) James Pennington (Jr. Representative) OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES : TACOMA BRANCH Nels Bjarke, Chairman Wilma Shannon, Treasurer Harry Connor, Vice Chairman Miles Johnson John Freeman (Ex-Officio) (Jr. Representative) Jack Gallagher James Henriot Edith Goodman George Munday Helen Sohlberg, Secretary OFFICERS: EVERETT BRANCH Jim Geniesse, Chairman Dorothy Philipp, Secretary Ralph Mackey, Treasurer COPYRIGHT 1962 BY THE MOUNTAINEERS The Mountaineer Climbing Code· A climbing party of three is the minimum, unless adequate support is available who have knowledge that the climb is in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's Steepest Mountain Jz4:Ces
    14 Signpost April 1984 WASHINGTON'S STEEPEST MOUNTAIN JZ4:CES vertical drop (MVD) within these set Stephen Fry ACCURACY distances. The accuracy of the data is mainly Once measured, the MVD can be dependent on two factors: measurement used as a yardstick to compare the error and the reliability of the topo- maximum steepness of one mountain graphic maps. Most of the error intro- with another. duced into the MVD data originates The most accurate and detailed from the lack of perfectly accurate Mountains with precipitous faces maps available were used to determine topographic maps. are dramatic. Anyone who has walked the MVDs of the mountains listed. The total possible error for the the Cascade Pass Trail and viewed the In the United States, most of my United States MVD data in .1 mile ranges imposing north face of Johannesburg measurements were from current from 3% to 6%. The total possible Mountain can attest to that. Europeans 1:24,000 or 1:62,500 USGS topograph- error for the United States in 1 mile also have long admired and been im- ic maps. Around the world, the scale is likely no greater than 3%. pressed with the steep faces of peaks of maps varied from 1:25,000 for the For mountains outside the United such as the Matterhorn and Eiger. Matterhorn and Mount Everest, to States, the reliability of the topographic Ever since my first neck-stretching 1:250,000 for K2 and Annapurna I. maps varies greatly. Generally for views of Mount Index from the Stevens The process of measuring the most of the mountain faces I have listed, Pass Highway over twenty years ago, MVDs simply involves using a caliper the accuracy is the same as the United I have been intrigued with steep moun- or precise ruler as a gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation
    THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE May 2008 Geography THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________________ Stan Stevens, Chair ______________________________________________ Piper Gaubatz, Member ______________________________________________ Laurie Brown, Department Head Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the people of the Sky Valley and the Skykomish Ranger District employees who have allowed me to become familiar with Wild Sky, the Forest Service, and the region as a whole. This research is largely based on interviews with the many people interested in the outcome of the Wild Sky Wilderness debate, and I greatly appreciate their willingness to spend time talking with me about the proposal, public involvement, Sky Valley history, and visions for the Valley’s future. Finally, thank you to Stan Stevens and Piper Gaubatz for the many hours they have spent reading and editing my work. iii ABSTRACT THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION MAY 2008 KASSIA C. RANDZIO B.A., KENYON COLLEGE M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Directed by: Professor Stan Stevens Wild Sky, a proposed wilderness in Washington State, has been a source of local contention since its inception. Drawing on the theories of political ecology, international conservation, and actor-based politics, this research seeks to understand the process of public participation in wilderness designation, the arguments both for and against Wild Sky, and how the wilderness proposal process could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County Hiking Guide
    2015- 2016 TO OUTDOOR ADVENTURE! 30 GREAT HIKES • DRIVING DIRECTIONS MAPS • ACCOMMODATIONS • LOCAL RESOURCES photo by Scott Morris PB | www.snohomish.org www.snohomish.org | 1 SCTB Print - Hiking Guide Cover 5.5” x 8.5” - Full Color 5-2015 HIKE NAME 1 Hike subtitle ROUNDTRIP m ile ELEVATION GAIN m ile HIKING SEASON m ile MAP m ile NOTES m ile DRIVING DIRECTIONS m ile CONTACT INFO m ile Hard to imagine, but one of the finest beaches River Delta. A fairly large lagoon has developed on in all of Snohomish County is just minutes from the island where you can watch for sandpipers, downtown Everett! And this two mile long sandy osprey, kingfishers, herons, finches, ducks, and expanse was created by man, not nature. Beginning more. in the 1890s, the Army Corp of Engineers built a You won’t be able to walk around the island as the jetty just north of Port Gardiner—then commenced channel side contains no beach. But the beach to dredge a channel. The spoils along with silt and on Possession Sound is wide and smooth and you sedimentation from the Snohomish River eventually can easily walk 4 to 5 miles going from tip to tip. created an island. Sand accumulated from tidal Soak up views of the Olympic Mountains; Whidbey, influences, birds arrived and nested, and plants Camano, and Gedney Islands; and downtown Everett soon colonized the island. against a backdrop of Cascades Mountains. In the 1980s the Everett Parks and Recreation Department began providing passenger ferry service to the island. Over 50,000 folks visit this sandy gem each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Trails Jul+Aug 2011
    Trail Work Myth-Busting, p.12 Maps You Need, p.33 Trappers Peak, p.51 WASHINGTON TRAILS July + August 2011 » A Publication of Washington Trails Association www.wta.org » $4.50 Head to the Crest Hike the Pacific Crest Trail for stellar views and soul repair INSIDE PCT Feats and Firsts Trail Angels Trail Magic Plus, How to Tell Better Tales Make Fish Tacos in the Backcountry This Month’s Cover » Photo by Karl Forsgaard Hiker Greg Jacoby amidst lupines and » Table of Contents bistort on the Pacific Crest Trail near White Pass July+August 2011 Volume 47, Issue 4 News + Views Backcountry The Front Desk » Craig McKibben The Gear Closet » Susan Ashlock, Why we need the PCT, even if we never Adam Scroggins hike it.» p.4 Navigate to the right map.» p.33 Family-friendly camping gear.» p.35 The Signpost » Lace Thornberg What motivates a PCT thru-hiker?» p.5 Sage Advice » Chris Wall How to tell spell-binding tales.» p.38 Trail Talk » Reader survey results and a Q&A session Trail Eats » Sarah Kirkconnell Dinner for two trailside.» with search and rescue.» p.6 p.40 Hiking News » 12Susan Elderkin Anniversaries and road closures.» p.8 Take a Hike WTA at Work Day Hikes and Overnights » Suggested hikes statewide.» p.41 Trail Work » Diane Bedell We take a pulaski to our favorite trail main- Nature on Trail » Sylvia Feder tenance myths.» p.12 22 You’ve seen krummholz before, but did you know what it was?» Action for Trails » Jonathan Guzzo, p.49 Ryan Ojerio A legislative session look back.» p.16 A Walk on the Wild Side » Why the Dark Divide goes too often unex- Elizabeth Lunney plored.» p.17 The essence of trail magic.» p.50 Membership News » Kara Chin Featured Landscape » Buff Black Hike-a-Thon—it’s on!» p.20 Why you really must visit Trappers Peak.» Heidi Walker p.51 On Trail Special Feature » All about the Pacific Crest Trail Best bets for a day or weekend.» p.22 PCT personalities.» 24 p.25 The PCT across a lifetime.» p.28 The PCT’s bold trendsetters.» p.31 Volunteer Vacations on the crest.» p.32 Find WTA online at www.wta.org.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Scientific Investigations Map 2940, Sheet 2
    Scientific Investigations Map 2940 U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources, U.S. National Park Service, and U.S. Forest Service Sheet 2 of 2 U.S. Geological Survey Pamphlets accompany map 123° 122° 121° 120° 121° 120° basalt lavas VOLCANIC 122° 121° 120° 49° 48°30’ erupt to form ARC 122° 121° 120° Mount Spickard oceanic plate BRITISH COLUMBIA MID-OCEAN 49° NORTHWEST OKANOGAN Ross Lake Fault Zone (System) Dome Ptarmigan River RIDGE Old Guard Glacier Mount Vedder Straight Peak Spine WESTERN Peak Peak Pk 49° Mountatn CANADA 5 BLOCK Point Baker Jack Mtn ocean floor basalt sedimentary Mt Baker ROBINSON MOUNTAIN UNITED METHOW Pasayten MOUNT BAKER [MB] rocks early Tertiary and Late Le Conte Glacier Twin 2000 [RM] STATES 10 Cretaceous metamorphism Sisters Jack METHOW BLOCK Mount 1600 San Juan BELLINGHAM Baker Mtn Robinson Mountain 4 CONCRETE 2000 Islands OCEANIC OCEANIC SU CHELAN BLOCK Methow CRUST rigid mantle B CRUST CASCADE 48°30’ Gardner Mtn LITHOSPHERE Creek DU Skagit C Fault Sedro 9 T rigid mantle DOMAIN Concrete CONTINENTAL TWISP plastic mantle plastic mantle IO Wolley Winthrop N early Late Cretaceous LITHOSPHERE 6 melting zone CONTINENTAL Sauk older STEHEKIN Washington (source of igneous rocks) Z melting zone metamorphism sedimentary O (more igneous rocks) Entiat DARRINGTON 1600 Pass Twisp MANTLE N OKANOGAN Mount rocks E 1200 P sediments SYSTEM U Misch LAKE LOBE G River Stehekin metamorphic Glacier pillow basalt E Lake rocks forming D T River a Peak Stillaguamish rr Darrington River dikes in METAMORPHIC g Vinegar Mt CHELAN S Glacier Chelan to Fault Fault O Bonanza n early Late Cretaceous 1200 U Peak gabbro Fault Pilchuck Peak -D 48° GLACIER N ultramafic rock e and Early Creataceous D SAUK RIVER [SR] TWISP [T] 2 3 v WENATCHEE BLOCK 48° i metamorphism Ophiolite layering ls SUBDUCTED OCEAN PLATE M Monroe 8 DOMAIN (OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE) t CORE MONROE Skykomish n OLYMPIC River F Chelan Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Geologic and Geophysical Mapping of Washington, Part II—Theses
    Index to Geologic and Geophysical Mapping of Washington, Part II—Theses, RESOURCES 1901 to 2001 compiled by Connie J. Manson WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Revised July 7, 2003 NATURAL Index to Geologic and Geophysical Mapping of Washington, Part II—Theses, 1901 to 2001 compiled by Connie J. Manson WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Revised July 7, 2003 ii Contents Introduction........................................... 1 Howtousethisindex....................................1 Howtoobtainthemaps...................................1 Acknowledgments ....................................... 1 Referencescited........................................ 1 Bibliography.......................................... 2 PLATES Plate 1. Geologic mapping—scale 1:480–1:23,760...................22 Plate 2. Geologic mapping—scale 1:24,000–1:29,000 .................23 Plate 3. Geologic mapping—scale 1:31,250–1:60,000 .................24 Plate 4. Geologic mapping—scale 1:62,500–1:63,360 .................25 Plate 5. Geologic mapping—scale 1:71,280–1:274,000 ................26 Plate 6. Geophysical mapping .............................. 27 iii iv Index to Geologic and Geophysical Mapping of Washington, Part II— Theses, 1901 to 2001 compiled by Connie J. Manson Revised July 7, 2003 Note: This index will be periodically revised as new maps become available. The index to published and open-filed mapping has been released separately as Part I of this index. INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The first index to thesis mapping of Washington State was pre- We are gratified that this map index project continues to be pared by William H. Reichert in 1969. That work was updated highly valued by the geoscience community. They deserve no to included thesis mapping through 1985 (Manson, 1986), and less than our best efforts. a supplement was issued to cover thesis mapping 1986 to 1998 Because this has been a long-term project, there are many (Manson, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the North Cascades Conservation Council Summer/Fall 2006
    THE WILD CASCADES THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL SUMMER/FALL 2006 THE WILD CASCADES • Summer 2005 he North Cascades Conservation TCouncil was formed in 957 “To pro- tect and preserve the North Cascades’ sce- nic, scientific, recreational, educational, and wilderness values.” Continuing this mission, NCCC keeps government officials, THE WILD CASCADES Summer/Fall 2006 environmental organizations, and the gen- eral public informed about issues affecting the Greater North Cascades Ecosystem. In This Issue Action is pursued through legislative, legal, and public participation channels to protect the lands, waters, plants and wildlife. 3 The President’s Report — MARC BARDSLEY Over the past third of a century the NCCC has led or participated in campaigns 4 A Fire District (with Phone Service) for Stehekin? to create the North Cascades National Park — CAROLYN MCCONNELL Complex, Glacier Peak Wilderness, and other units of the National Wilderness System from the W.O. Douglas Wilderness So What’s Good about Global Warming — HARVEY MANNING north to the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, the Henry M. Jackson Wilderness, the Chelan- 5 Opportunity on the Whitechuck: An NCCC Proposal — RICK MCGUIRE Sawtooth Wilderness and others. Among its most dramatic victories has been work- 8 Wilderness in Washington: 964/987 — HARVEY MANNING ing with British Columbia allies to block the raising of Ross Dam, which would have drowned Big Beaver Valley. 10 Eco-Collaboration: Finding a Shared Vision with Who? — RICK MCGUIRE 14 2006 North Cascades Glacier Climate Project Field Season MEMBERSHIP — TOM HAMMOND The NCCC is supported by member dues and private donations. These sup- 18 Critical Wild Sky Inholding Purchased — RICK MCGUIRE port publication of The Wild Cascades and lobbying activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ore Deposits of the Index Mining District
    W.A.SH1NGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN No. 7 Geology and Ore Deposits of the Index Mining District By CHARLES E. WEAVER OLYMPIA, WASB.: E. L. BOARDMAN, PUBLIC PRINTER 1912 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Governor M. E. HAY, Chairman. State Treasurer J. G. LEWIS, Secretary. President T. F. KANE. President E. A. BRYAN, HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. SOLON SHEDD, Assistant State Geologist. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Governor M. E. }lay, Chairman, and Members of the Board of Geol,ogical Survey: GENTLEMEN-I have the honor to submit herewith a. report entitled "Geology and Ore Deposits of the Index Mining Dis­ trict," by Charles E. Weaver, with the recommendation that it be printed a.s Bulletin No. 7 of the Survey reports. Very respectfully, HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. University Station, Seattle, December 1, 1911. CONTENTS. Page ILLUSTRATIONS 7 lNTROOUC'l'.ION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • . • . • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • 9 Field work and acknowledgments.......... .................. 9 Location and area of th.e district. 10 Industries and settlements. 12 Literature . 14 CHAP'fER I. PHYS(OGRAl'lIY. • • • . • . • . • • • • • . • • • . • • . • • . • • . 21 Topography . 21 General statement . 21 Drainage . 22 Forms of the surface...................................... 24 Glaciation . 25 Climate . ... 28 Vegetation . 29 Relation of present topography to general geology. 30 CHAPTER II. GENERAL GEOLOGY. • • • • . • . • . • • • • • • • . • . • . • . • 34 General statement . 34 Gu.nu Peak formation. 35 Areal distribution . 35 General description . 36 Thickness . 37 Correlation and age....................................... 37 Granodlorite . 38 Areal distribution . 38 Petrograpby . 39 Contact relations . 42 Granodlorite aplite . 43 Andesite porphyry dikes...................................... 44 West Index andesitlc series................................... 44 Areal distribution . 44 General description . 45 Correlation . 45 Howard a1·kose formation. 46 General description . 46 Areal distribution .
    [Show full text]
  • 1956 , the Mountaineer Organized 1906 • Incorporated 1913
    The M_ 0 U NTA I N E E R SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 1906 CJifty Qoulen Years of ctl([ountaineering 1956 , The Mountaineer Organized 1906 • Incorporated 1913 Volume 50 December 28, 1956 Number 1 Boa KOEHLER Editor in Chief MORDA SLAUSON Assistant Editor MARJORIE WILSON Assistant Editor SHIRLEY EASTMAN Editorial Assistant JOAN ASTELL Everett Branch Editor BRUNI WISLICENUS Tacoma Branch Editor IRENE HINKLE Membership Editor I,, � Credits: Robert N. Latz, J climbing adviser; Mrs. Irving Gavett, clubroom custodian (engravings) ; Elenor Bus­ well, membership; Nicole Desme, advertising. Published monthly, January to November· inclusive, and semi­ monthly during December by THE MOUNTAINEERS, Inc., P. 0. Box 122, Seattle 11, Wash. (Clubrooms, 523 Pike St., Se­ attle.) Subscription Price: $2 yearly. Entered as second class matter, April 18, 1922, at Post Of­ fice in Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Copyright 1956 by THE MOUNTAINEERS, Inc. Photo: Shadow Creek Falls by Antonio Gamero. Confents I E A FoR.WORD-hy Paul W. Wiseman__________________________________________________________________________ 5 History" 1906 THE FrnsT TwE 'TY-YEARS 1930-by Joseph T. H<izard_ ________________:____________________ 6 1931 THESECOND TwE 'TY-FIVE YEARS 1956-by Arthur R. Winder________________________ 14 1909 THE EvERETT BRANCH 1956-by Joan Astell ------------------------------------------------- 21 1912 THE TACOMA BRANCH 1956-by Keith D. Goodman---------------------------------------- 23 A WORD PORTRAIT OF EDMONDS. MEA 'Y-by Lydia Love,·ing Forsyth ______________________ 26 MEANY: A PoEM-by A. H. Albertson ..------------------ --------------------------------------------------- 32 FLEETING GLIMP ES OF EDMOND S. MEANY-by Ben C. Mooers------------------------------ 33 FrnsT SUMMER OUTING: THE OLYMPICS, 1907-by L. A. Nelson-----------------�--------- 34 EARLY Oun Gs THROUGH THE EYES OF A GIRL-by Mollie Leckenby King------------ 36 JOHN Mum's AscE T OF MOUNT RAINIER (AS RECORDED BY HIS PHOTOGRAPHER A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air USA (W7W)
    Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7W) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S39.1 Issue number 2.0 Date of issue 01-Dec-2016 Participation start date 01-July-2009 Authorised Date 08-Jul-2009 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Darryl Holman, WW7D, [email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for USA W7W-Washington Table of contents Change Control ................................................................................................................... 4 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Notices ............................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Association Reference Data .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Program Derivation ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 General Information ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Final Access, Activation Zone, and Operating Location Explained ............................. 8 2.4 Rights of Way and Access Issues ................................................................................
    [Show full text]