DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium 2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation— Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation NASA • NGA • NOAA • USDA • USGS Circular 1468 Version 1.1, October 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. An artist’s conception of the Landsat 9 spacecraft, the ninth satellite to be launched in the long-running Landsat program, high above the U.S. Gulf Coast. National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) Goddard Space Flight Center/Conceptual Image Laboratory. Facing page. The Ganges River forms an extensive delta where it empties into the Bay of Bengal. The delta is largely covered with a swamp forest known as the Sunderbans, which is home to the Royal Bengal Tiger. It is also home to most of Bangladesh, one of the world’s most densely populated countries (image from NASA, acquired by Landsat 7’s Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus [ETM+] sensor on February 28, 2000). 2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation—Remote Sensing Satellite Compendium By Shankar N. Ramaseri Chandra, Jon B. Christopherson, and Kimberly A. Casey Circular 1468 Version 1.1, October 2020 Supersedes USGS Circular 1455 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 First release: September 2020 Revised: October 2020 (ver 1.1) Supersedes USGS Circular 1455 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Ramaseri Chandra, S.N., Christopherson, J.B., and Casey, K.A., 2020, 2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evalu- ation—Remote sensing satellite compendium: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1468 (ver. 1.1, October 2020), 253 p., JACIE https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1468. [Supersedes USGS Circular 1455.] Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Chandra, Shankar N. Ramaseri, author. | Christopherson, Jon B., author. | Casey, Kimberly A., author. | Geological Survey (U.S.), issuing body. Title: 2020 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation : remote sensing satellite compendium / by Shankar N. Ramaseri Chandra, Jon B. Christopherson, and Kimberly A. Casey. Other titles: Remote sensing satellite compendium Description: Reston, Virginia : U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, [2020] | Series: Circular ; 1468 | Supersedes USGS Circular 1455 | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2020041056 | ISBN 9781411343757 (paperback) | ISBN 9781411343757 (pdf) Subjects: LCSH: Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (Program) | Remote sensing. | Landsat satellites. Classification: LCC G70.4 .C525 2020 | DDC 526.9/82--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020041056 ISSN 1067-084X (print) ISSN 2330-5703 (online) ISBN 978-1-4113-4375-7 iii Preface The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Imaging Program (NLIP) has responsibility for providing Earth science data to support scientific, operational, resource management, and other national needs. The USGS NLIP gathers details on the scientific and operational Earth observation sensor needs of users around the world and applies these metrics towards various Earth observation sensor and data development efforts. The USGS NLIP operates and provides data for the Landsat series of satellites and their more than 48-year data record of our changing planet. To understand and quantify Earth observation scientific and operational user needs, the Require- ments, Capabilities, and Analysis for Earth Observation (RCA–EO) Project has been established. One of the missions of the RCA–EO Project is to identify and catalog existing and planned capabilities for measuring and monitoring the Earth. The RCA–EO Project also supports the Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) mission and has developed this compendium as one of the USGS contributions to the JACIE effort. This publication was produced by the USGS NLIP RCA–EO Project Team at the USGS National Center and Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. Authors: Shankar N. Ramaseri Chandra, KBR, contractor to the USGS. Jon B. Christopherson, KBR, contractor to the USGS. Kimberly A. Casey, USGS. JACIE iv Acknowledgments Decades ago, the former director of the National Aeronautics and Space Agency’s (NASA’s) Earth Observation Programs began a satellite list of his own, offering basic facts about a variety of commercial and civilian orbiters. Affectionately known as the “Bill Stoney list,” the publica- tion served as a template for the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center- produced compendium released over the summer. Three of the EROS staffers who worked on the book had the chance to hand Mr. Stoney a copy of it in 2019 during their visit to Reston, Virginia, for the annual Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) workshop—an event Stoney spoke at 12 years ago. Stoney remains a well-known figure within the JACIE community; however, Stoney’s legacy is further reaching than his postre- tirement contributions to satellite tracking. Stoney began his career in 1949, before NASA had the name it has come to be known by. He worked on pilotless aircraft and led the development of the Scout rocket that was responsible for launching satellites aloft from 1961 through 1994. In 2017, NASA called the rocket “one of the most successful boosters in NASA history” Jon Christopherson (center) and Greg Stensaas in the piece titled “Ten People You Wish (right) handing over the first edition of the com- You Met,” where Stoney is featured. pendium to Mr. Stoney (left), September 2019. Stoney also served as the head of the spacecraft technology division at the Manned Spaceflight Center in Houston, Texas, from 1963 to 1968 and director of engineering for the Apollo Program JACIE Office. In 1969, he was awarded the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, but he was not finished. He was named director of Earth Observation Programs in 1973, where he worked with the Landsat program. In addition, this year we give a special acknowledgement to the NASA Terra mission. Auspiciously, with this 2020 compendium release, Terra has passed its 20th year of continuous monitoring of several of Earth’s atmosphere, land, and aquatic characteristics. The Terra mission, roughly the size of a small school bus and launched on December 18, 1999, has been crucial in providing a myriad of data to study the Earth, allowing for analysis of data spanning Artistic rendering of the Terra satellite and its five sensors onboard: ASTER, CERES, MISR, MODIS, and MOPITT. v many years and now decades. Terra is considered a flagship mission of the NASA Earth Observ- ing System. Earth science data from the Terra mission have resulted in ground-breaking science, represented in over 20,000 peer-reviewed science publications. The five sensors aboard Terra (ASTER, CERES, MISR, MODIS, and MOPITT) yield an impressive span of data that can be har- nessed to improve our understanding of Earth and its processes. Compendium Coverage, Conventions, and Caveats • This edition of the compendium provides data sheets for the numerous Chinese and Russian Systems. • Many sources were mined for the data and information in this compendium. Appendixes 1 and 2 list those sources and how we harvested information from them. • The data sheets in appendix 4 are arranged alphabetically by satellite or constellation name with their respective sensors behind each satellite. Sometimes satellites are known by more than one name. • In cases where data are not available or unknown, we have used a dash “—” to indicate this lack of information. • The compendium focuses heavily, but not exclusively, on land imaging satellites and measur- ing sensors. Satellites carrying multiple instruments (for example, Terra or Aqua) describe only the instruments aboard with significant land imaging or measuring capabilities. Because of the rapid changes in the industry, the information presented in this compendium will change, and some of it will likely be out of date by the time of publication. Information in this compendium was gleaned from numerous sources to the best of the abilities of the authors. JACIE JACIE vii Contents Preface ...........................................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................iv Compendium Coverage, Conventions, and Caveats .......................................................................v Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 The Compendium of Land Remote Sensing Satellites ...................................................................1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Page 2017
    Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. 2017 Sustainability Report 20172016 in ina nutshella nutshell of procurement billion$ of procurement 3.6billion$in Sales 61% is local 3.5 in Sales 62% is local st in local patent 1 registration Record customer at 5.8 Backlog contracts billion$ Backlog of orders at 9 of billion$ of orders at 11 of billion$ Largest 14,857 high-tech company 15,359employees in Israel employees 18,23716,233 volunteeringvolunteering hours hours Sustaining over th 50,000 rankingth in the “best place to work” list households nationwide 9 6 ranking in the “best place to work” list 54%54% hazardoushazardous waste waste recycledrecycled or reused or reused 58%56% non-hazardousnon-hazardous waste waste recycledrecycled or reused or reused 435 500 GWh GWh Saved Savedsince 2007 since 2007 Message from our Board of Directors 102-14 IAIs 2017 sustainability report is a detailed record of our The very existence of IAI directly contributes to the strength and ongoing progress as a resilient, long-lasting, and extraordinary resilience of the local communities in which we operate across company. Our operations and products enable us not only to Israel. Our business model is built on identifying long term advance and achieve our business objectives, but also to fulll mega trends, and partnering with our customers to offer top our responsibilities towards our customers, employees, the quality technology excellence and innovations in every area communities in which we operate and society as a whole. they look to grow in. We report here in detail on the management of our environmental impact and the principles of We make this commitment actionable through specic pollution prevention and continual improvement integrated organizational mechanisms, starting with IAIs board of into our business.
    [Show full text]
  • EOOS Posters Abstracts
    Posters Submissions – EOOS Conference 21 23 November 2018 1. Sylvie Pouliquen Ifremer [email protected] Authors: "Gille Reverdin CNRS/INSU email: [email protected] , Pierre-Yves Le Traon Ifremer & Mercator-Ocean email: [email protected]) and the Coriolis 2014-2020 steering committee." Theme: From standalone to integrated ocean and coastal observing platforms Title: Coriolis: an integrated in-situ ocean observation infrastructure for operational oceanography and ocean/climate research "The Coriolis (www.coriolis.eu.org) structure gathers efforts of seven French institutes (CNES, CNRS, IFREMER, IPEV, IRD, Météo-France, SHOM, CEREMA) to organize the in-situ component of the French operational oceanography infrastructure. The objective is to organize the data acquisition and real- time/delayed mode data processing of in-situ measurements required for operational oceanography and ocean/climate research. Coriolis is focused on a limited number of physical and biogeochemical parameters that are acquired systematically and in real time or slightly delayed mode. Coriolis follows a fully open data policy. The framework of collaboration for Coriolis was renewed in 2014 and now covers the time period of 2014 up to 2020. By signing this new agreement, the eight directors of French institutes have clearly stated their willingness to sustain and consolidate further the Coriolis in-situ infrastructure. The new framework agreement strengthens the links between research and operational oceanography. The scope is also extended to integrate the main French contributions to the global and regional in-situ observing systems: Argo, gliders, research vessels, ship of opportunities, drifting buoys, marine mammals, tidal networks and high frequency coastal observatories.
    [Show full text]
  • AATSR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    AATSR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Author : IDEAS+ AATSR QC Team (Telespazio VEGA UK) IDEAS+-VEG-OQC-REP-2117 Issue 3 14 December 2016 AATSR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Issue 3 AMENDMENT RECORD SHEET The Amendment Record Sheet below records the history and issue status of this document. ISSUE DATE REASON 1 20 Dec 2005 Initial Issue (as AEP_REP_001) 2 02 Oct 2013 Updated with new questions and information (issued as IDEAS- VEG-OQC-REP-0955) 3 14 Dec 2016 General updates, major edits to Q37., new questions: Q17., Q25., Q26., Q28., Q32., Q38., Q39., Q48. Now issued as IDEAS+-VEG-OQC-REP-2117 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 The Third AATSR Reprocessing Dataset (IPF 6.05) ............................................................ 5 1.2 References ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. GENERAL QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................... 7 Q1. What does AATSR stand for? ........................................................................................ 7 Q2. What is AATSR and what does it do? ............................................................................ 7 Q3. What is Envisat? ............................................................................................................. 7 Q4. What orbit does Envisat use? ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Space Technology Guide
    Foreword Space-based capabilities are integral to the U.S.’s national security operational doctrines and processes. Such capa- bilities as reliable, real-time high-bandwidth communica- tions can provide an invaluable combat advantage in terms of clarity of command intentions and flexibility in the face of operational changes. Satellite-generated knowledge of enemy dispositions and movements can be and has been exploited by U.S. and allied commanders to achieve deci- sive victories. Precision navigation and weather data from space permit optimal force disposition, maneuver, decision- making, and responsiveness. At the same time, space systems focused on strategic nuclear assets have enabled the National Command Authorities to act with confidence during times of crisis, secure in their understanding of the strategic force postures. Access to space and the advantages deriving from operat- ing in space are being affected by technological progress If our Armed Forces are to be throughout the world. As in other areas of technology, the faster, more lethal, and more precise in 2020 advantages our military derives from its uses of space are than they are today, we must continue to dynamic. Current space capabilities derive from prior invest in and develop new military capabilities. decades of technology development and application. Joint Vision 2020 Future capabilities will depend on space technology programs of today. Thus, continuing investment in space technologies is needed to maintain the “full spectrum dominance” called for by Joint Vision 2010 and 2020, and to protect freedom of access to space by all law-abiding nations. Trends in the availability and directions of technology clearly suggest that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafael Space Propulsion
    Rafael Space Propulsion CATALOGUE A B C D E F G Proprietary Notice This document includes data proprietary to Rafael Ltd. and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed, in whole or in part, for any purpose without written authorization from Rafael Ltd. Rafael Space Propulsion INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW PART A: HERITAGE PART B: SATELLITE PROPULSION SYSTEMS PART C: PROPELLANT TANKS PART D: PROPULSION THRUSTERS Satellites Launchers PART E: PROPULSION SYSTEM VALVES PART F: SPACE PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES PART G: QUALITY MANAGEMENT CATALOGUE – Version 2 | 2019 Heritage PART A Heritage 0 Heritage PART A Rafael Introduction and Overview Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. designs, develops, manufactures and supplies a wide range of high-tech systems for air, land, sea and space applications. Rafael was established as part of the Ministry of Defense more than 70 years ago and was incorporated in 2002. Currently, 7% of its sales are re-invested in R&D. Rafael’s know-how is embedded in almost every operational Israel Defense Forces (IDF) system; the company has a special relationship with the IDF. Rafael has formed partnerships with companies with leading aerospace and defense companies worldwide to develop applications based on its proprietary technologies. Offset activities and industrial co-operations have been set-up with more than 20 countries world-wide. Over the last decade, international business activities have been steadily expanding across the globe, with Rafael acting as either prime-contractor or subcontractor, capitalizing on its strengths at both system and sub-system levels. Rafael’s highly skilled and dedicated workforce tackles complex projects, from initial development phases, through prototype, production and acceptance tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Cci ATSR-2 and AATSR Dataset Version 3: a 17-Year Climatology of Global Cloud and Radiation Properties Caroline A
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-217 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 11 December 2019 Science c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data Cloud_cci ATSR-2 and AATSR dataset version 3: a 17-year climatology of global cloud and radiation properties Caroline A. Poulsen1, Gregory R. McGarragh2, Gareth E. Thomas3,6, Martin Stengel4, Matthew W. Christensen5, Adam C. Povey7, Simon R. Proud5,6, Elisa Carboni3,6, Rainer Hollmann4, and Roy G. Grainger7 1Monash University, Melbourne, Australia 2Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK Now at Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University 3Science Technology Facility Council, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK 4Deutscher Wetterdienst, Frankfurter Str. 135, 63067, Offenbach, Germany 5Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK 6National Centre for Earth Observation, Reading RG6 6BB, UK 7National Centre for Earth Observation, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, U.K. Correspondence: Caroline Poulsen ([email protected]) Abstract. We present version 3 (V3) of the Cloud_cci ATSR-2/AATSR dataset. The dataset was created for the European Space Agency (ESA) Cloud_cci (Climate Change Initiative) program. The cloud properties were retrieved from the second Along- Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR-2) on board the second European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS-2) spanning 1995-2003 and the Advanced ATSR (AATSR) on board Envisat, which spanned 2002-2012. The data comprises a comprehensive set 5 of cloud properties: cloud top height, temperature, pressure, spectral albedo, cloud effective emissivity, effective radius and optical thickness alongside derived liquid and ice water path.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Systems
    Chapter 18 REST-OF-WORLD (ROW) SATELLITE SYSTEMS For the longest time, space exploration was an exclusive club comprised of only two members, the United States and the Former Soviet Union. That has now changed due to a number of factors, among the more dominant being economics, advanced and improved technologies and national imperatives. Today, the number of nations with space programs has risen to over 40 and will continue to grow as the costs of spacelift and technology continue to decrease. RUSSIAN SATELLITE SYSTEMS The satellite section of the Russian In the post-Soviet era, Russia contin- space program continues to be predomi- ues its efforts to improve both its military nantly government in character, with and commercial space capabilities. most satellites dedicated either to civil/ These enhancements encompass both military applications (such as communi- orbital assets and ground-based space cations and meteorology) or exclusive support facilities. Russia has done some military missions (such as reconnaissance restructuring of its operating principles and targeting). A large portion of the regarding space. While these efforts have Russian space program is kept running by attempted not to detract from space-based launch services, boosters and launch support to military missions, economic sites, paid for by foreign commercial issues and costs have lead to a lowering companies. of Russian space-based capabilities in The most obvious change in Russian both orbital assets and ground station space activity in recent years has been the capabilities. decrease in space launches and corre- The influence of Glasnost on Russia's sponding payloads. Many of these space programs has been significant, but launches are for foreign payloads, not public announcements regarding space Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • FAME-C: Cloud Property Retrieval Using Synergistic AATSR and MERIS Observations
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3873–3890, 2014 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/3873/2014/ doi:10.5194/amt-7-3873-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. FAME-C: cloud property retrieval using synergistic AATSR and MERIS observations C. K. Carbajal Henken, R. Lindstrot, R. Preusker, and J. Fischer Institute for Space Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin (FUB), Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: C. K. Carbajal Henken ([email protected]) Received: 29 April 2014 – Published in Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.: 19 May 2014 Revised: 17 September 2014 – Accepted: 11 October 2014 – Published: 25 November 2014 Abstract. A newly developed daytime cloud property re- trievals. Biases are generally smallest for marine stratocu- trieval algorithm, FAME-C (Freie Universität Berlin AATSR mulus clouds: −0.28, 0.41 µm and −0.18 g m−2 for cloud MERIS Cloud), is presented. Synergistic observations from optical thickness, effective radius and cloud water path, re- the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) spectively. This is also true for the root-mean-square devia- and the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS), tion. Furthermore, both cloud top height products are com- both mounted on the polar-orbiting Environmental Satellite pared to cloud top heights derived from ground-based cloud (Envisat), are used for cloud screening. For cloudy pixels radars located at several Atmospheric Radiation Measure- two main steps are carried out in a sequential form. First, ment (ARM) sites. FAME-C mostly shows an underestima- a cloud optical and microphysical property retrieval is per- tion of cloud top heights when compared to radar observa- formed using an AATSR near-infrared and visible channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar
    Synthetic Aperture Radar Subjects: Information Technology & Data Management Submitted by: Sung Wook Paek Definition SAR constellations Table of Contents [Hide] 1. Introduction Space-based radar observation has growing potentials for monitoring the global biospheric diversity subject to anthropogenic drivers at geological scales [1]. The performance of radar is less affected by weather and sunlight conditions than that of optical sensors. Satellites with onboard sensors can provide comprehensive coverage of remote areas or vast regions that may be too costly for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or ground-based platforms, provided that all platforms provide congruent results via calibrations [2][3][4]. Therefore, it was Seasat, the first satellite dedicated to remote sensing of the Earth’s oceans, that carried the first synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and other radar instruments operable in space. Despite these advantages, miniaturization of radar-carrying satellites was rather slow compared to satellites carrying optical devices due to the lack of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components as well as challenging design requirements for the satellite platform [5][6]. Representative use cases of space-based radar include altimetry, sounding, scatterometry, and so forth in the studies of land, cryosphere, and oceans. Biospheric monitoring is another useful application because radar has high sensitivity in detecting surface changes in a target area and discriminating mobile targets against a background [7]. This paper will consider mainly SAR because of its three-dimensional mapping capability through interferometry. The heritage of Seasat has influenced many of later SAR missions for decades, as listed in Table 1 [8][9][10][11][12][13]; for instance, Shuttle Image Radar (SIR) missions used spare parts of the previous Seasat mission onboard Space Shuttles to test SAR image applications in land use, geology, hydrology, and forestry [14][15].
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nano/Microsatellite Market Forecast, 9Th Edition
    2019 NANO/MICROSATELLITE MARKET FORECAST, 9TH EDITION Copyright 2018, SpaceWorks Enterprises, Inc. (SEI) APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. SPACEWORKS ENTERPRISES, INC., COPYRIGHT 2018. 1 Since 2008, SpaceWorks has actively monitored companies and economic activity across both the satellite and launch sectors 0 - 50 kg 50 - 250kg 250 - 1000kg 1000 - 2000kg 2000kg+ Custom market assessments are available for all mass classes NANO/MICROSATELLITE DEFINITION Picosatellite Nanosatellite Microsatellite Small/Medium Satellite (0.1 – 0.99 kg) (1 – 10 kg) (10 – 100 kg) (100 – 1000 kg) 0 kg 1 kg 10 kg 100 kg 1000 kg This report bounds the upper range of interest in microsatellites at 50 kg given the relatively large amount of satellite development activity in the 1 – 50 kg range FORECASTING METHODOLOGY SpaceWorks’ proprietary Launch Demand Database (LDDB) Downstream serves as the data source for all satellite market Demand assessments ▪ Planned The LDDB is a catalogue of over 10,000+ historical and Constellations future satellites containing both public and non-public (LDDB) satellite programs Launch Supply SpaceWorks newly updated Probabilistic Forecast Model (PFM) is used to generate future market potential SpaceWorks PFM Model ▪ The PFM considers down-stream demand, announced/planed satellite constellations, and supply-side dynamics, among other relevant factors Expert Analysis The team of expert industry analysts at SpaceWorks SpaceWorks further interprets and refines the PFM results to create Forecast accurate market forecasts Methodology at a Glance 2018 SpaceWorks forecasted 2018 nano/microsatellite launches with unprecedented accuracy – actual satellites launched amounted to just 5% below our analysts’ predictions. In line with SpaceWorks’ expectations, the industry corrected after a record launch year in 2017, sending 20% less nano/microsatellites to orbit than in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS")
    High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS") DTRA Advanced Systems and Concepts Office April 2001 1 3/23/01 SPONSOR: Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dr. Jay Davis, Director Advanced Systems and Concepts Office - Dr. Randall S. Murch, Director BACKGROUND: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) was founded in 1998 to integrate and focus the capabilities of the Department of Defense (DoD) that address the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threat. To assist the Agency in its primary mission, the Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (ASCO) develops and maintains and evolving analytical vision of necessary and sufficient capabilities to protect United States and Allied forces and citizens from WMD attack. ASCO is also charged by DoD and by the U.S. Government generally to identify gaps in these capabilities and initiate programs to fill them. It also provides support to the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee (TRAC), and its Panels, with timely, high quality research. SUPERVISING PROJECT OFFICER: Dr. John Parmentola, Chief, Advanced Operations and Systems Division, ASCO, DTRA, (703)-767-5705. The publication of this document does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of the sponsoring agency. 1 Study Participants • DTRA/AS • RAND – John Parmentola – Peter Wilson – Thomas Killion – Roger Molander – William Durch – David Mussington – Terry Heuring – Richard Mesic – James Bonomo • DTRA/TD – Lewis Cohn • Logicon RDA – Les Palkuti – Glenn Kweder – Thomas Kennedy – Rob Mahoney – Kenneth Schwartz – Al Costantine – Balram Prasad • Mission Research Corp. – William White 2 3/23/01 2 Focus of This Briefing • Vulnerability of commercial and government-owned, unclassified satellite constellations in low earth orbit (LEO) to the effects of a high-altitude nuclear explosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Citizens’ Charter of Department of Space
    GSAT-17 Satellites Images icro M sat ries Satellit Se e -2 at s to r a C 0 SAT-1 4 G 9 -C V L S P III-D1 -Mk LV GS INS -1 C Asia Satell uth ite o (G S S A T - 09 9 LV-F ) GS ries Sat Se ellit t-2 e sa to 8 r -C3 a LV C PS Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Annual Report 2017 - 2018 Citizens’ Charter of Department Of Space Department Of Space (DOS) has the primary responsibility of promoting the development of space science, technology and applications towards achieving self-reliance and facilitating in all round development of the nation. With this basic objective, DOS has evolved the following programmes: • Indian National Satellite (INSAT) programme for telecommunication, television broadcasting, meteorology, developmental education, societal applications such as telemedicine, tele-education, tele-advisories and similar such services • Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellite programme for the management of natural resources and various developmental projects across the country using space based imagery • Indigenous capability for the design and development of satellite and associated technologies for communications, navigation, remote sensing and space sciences • Design and development of launch vehicles for access to space and orbiting INSAT / GSAT, IRS and IRNSS satellites and space science missions • Research and development in space sciences and technologies as well as application programmes for national development The Department Of Space is committed to: • Carrying out research and development in satellite and launch vehicle technology with a goal to achieve total self reliance • Provide national space infrastructure for telecommunications and broadcasting needs of the country • Provide satellite services required for weather forecasting, monitoring, etc.
    [Show full text]