Current State and Prospects of Interaction of Russia and the Baltic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 273 International Conference on Communicative Strategies of Information Society (CSIS 2018) Current State and Prospects of Interaction Between Russia and Baltic Sea Region in LNG Market Podolyanets L.A. Veselova Yu.A. Department of Economics of Accounting and Finance Department of Economics of Accounting and Finance Saint-Petersburg mining University Saint-Petersburg mining University Saint-Petersburg, Russia Saint-Petersburg, Russia AbstractThe LNG market is characterized by growth and confirmed by successful development of the “Northern volatility, change of operating conditions. The Baltic states create Measurement” program among the EU, Russia, Norway and a gas infrastructure of LNG which is independent of the Russian Iceland. It has been established not only for sale of the Russian Federation. Russia has not created the complex strategy of LNG resources, but also for cooperation between the countries of production and export. The research objective is to study the role of the Russian LNG export in the Baltic Sea region, assessment of Northern Europe. The authors are based on the transformation the Russian possible prospects in the LNG market. The main of the relations to the LNG market from communication results of the research include the following: defining competitive between the EU and Russia into two directions. advantage of Russia in the Baltic Sea region; determining According to the authors' opinion the research of the LNG prospects of creating essential infrastructure of LNG production in the Northwest region of Russia. The Russian Federation has market should be done taking into consideration not only competitive advantages due to short delivery distances, good regulatory and business practice formed in the process of relationships with the majority of the Baltic states; price cooperation between Russia and EU, but also relations of advantages; considerable export potential due to the possibility of interaction between the EU-Baltic Europe and Baltic Europe – developing the system of the LNG mini-plants destroying “Northern measurement”. monopoly of the Russian gas exporters. Thus it will allow one to improve the Russian-European relationship in accordance with The authors' hypothesis is focused on experts opinions that the possibility of implementing the Third Energy Package of the the Baltic Europe and “Northern measurement” are the special EU (2009). The theoretical and practical importance of the metaregions for providing safety and stability based on research is defined by the described tendencies and prospects of principles of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement the LNG Baltic market development with the Russian Federation between Russia and the EU. In spite of deterioration in the cooperation. They can be used for forming strategic programs relations, the issue of energy security is significant for all including implementation of the LNG projects by the Russian participants. For the countries of the Baltic region it is companies and incentivized investors. Participation of the Russian Federation in the LNG market of the Baltic Sea region is possible, connected with the fears caused by dependence on the Russian mutually beneficial and commercially reasonable. gas supply. Though for Russia it is associated with “safety of demand” - necessity to obtain gas sale guarantees. In this case Keywordsliquefied natural gas (LNG), export, Baltic sea the LNG market is unique as, unlike pipeline gas, the above- region stated contradictions are not so strict. The Baltic countries can replace the main LNG supplier without any serious I. INTRODUCTION consequences. Whereas Russia can use other customers in the The geographical location, resource endowment of Russia case of adverse trading conditions. Thus, it is possible to speak and financial technological capabilities of the EU have caused about reducing the political component in these relations and strong trade connection between them which can not be consider only economy of the competitive market. Particularly destroyed in short terms without enormous losses for all we take into account the situation with the LNG market taking participants. The relationships are exposed to strong negative place in recent years and having impact on development of the impact from the different parties in which both economic and situation in the Baltic region. political aspects, and the interests of various beneficiaries are High uncertainty and volatility of LNG market are limiting mixed. In such conditions it seems to be relevant to do the factors in the research of the topic. research of the current state and to justify possible development prospects of one of the new volatile markets in the region in LNG location with field distribution and a focus on Europe which many issues and contradictions as well as a high share of are gaining importance at the present time. LNG market is uncertainty have been presented. According to the authors' divided into gas fields where gas is produced. The biggest ones opinion, the market of LNG in the Baltic region can be regarded are the Pacific and the Atlantic gas fields. The biggest part of as the market taking into account interests and deliveries of production comes from the Middle East where the main Russia. The authors try to carry out their research in the most reserves are concentrated in Iran, Russia, Qatar, Turkmenistan, pragmatic direction but considering growth of negative factors, and countries of the Middle East. The development of gas- which are mostly political ones. The choice of the Baltic region carrier industry is stimulated by the development of new for the research is caused by its functioning features which are deposits and the growing production at the existing ones [12]. quite different from the EU. So it has created the “Baltic In the Baltic countries, LNG import growth is caused by an Europe” concept. The positive cooperative experience of effort to provide a variety of energy supply and, as a result, to Russia and the Baltic region in the Post-Soviet time is develop alternative routes of gas transportation. A short- Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). 193 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 273 distance marine transportation and potential LNG demand are a alternative ways of transportation and weaken dependence on decisive factor for all countries. Large marine terminals are Russia [19]. expected to be constructed in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and It is expected that large-scale terminals will have been Finland by 2020. Furthermore, investment into other large-scale installed in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland by 2020. projects, such as LNG bunker terminals in Germany, Belgium, Besides, it is planned to make investments into large-scale and the Netherlands, which will assist the already existing LNG projects such as LNG-bunker terminals in Germany, Belgium terminals, are planned [17]. and the Netherlands which will supplement the existing LNG Political and economic challenges of energy security at the storage terminals [17]. developing LNG market deserve a scientific investigation. The features of Russian strategy on the LNG market of the According to some research, American LNG will play an Baltic region are also considered to be up to date [19]. important part on the European energy market in the future. Washington is planning to facilitate shipping terms for The prospects of the LNG market development will be American LNG exporters to Eastern and Central Europe. The connected with elaboration of the environmental legislation. strategic mission is to decrease energy dependence of these The LNG market development is stimulated by environmental regions from Russian supplies, both by land and under the legislation, new applications and expansion of LNG use in Baltic Sea (Nord Stream). The American government is small scales. Natural gas will also compete with coal because planning to use the rapidly developing national gas reserves as of its advantage of being used as back-up fuel for renewable a “political instrument” [13]. sources of energy. It is mostly used for microgeneration of energy and heat as well as fuel for trucks, public transport and A globalization of economic relations between the Baltic railroads. Wider spread availability of LNG, lower States after launching a floating LNG terminal in Lithuania is transportation costs and development of the LNG small planned. The Baltic States are considering investment transport parks allow to carry out LNG deliveries of smaller alternatives. The terminal will make a considerable impact on volumes to the local markets which are not included in gas gas prices. Lithuania is planning to export gas to other Baltic network. Not only regional importers, but also such exporters States [16]. as Russia want to use this tendency[18]. Both Russia and EU have a number of LNG projects in the Further development of the gas market will influence price Baltic Sea. These projects involve gas supplies to the Baltic formation in this sector. One of the most important tendencies States as alternative ways of gas transportation, thus reducing in European gas wholesale markets of the recent years has been energy dependence on Russia. Russian LNG terminals are active replacement of the price formation mechanisms meant for supplies to Asian markets, which are not receiving dominating earlier. First of all oil indexation (because of a natural gas at present, or could alternatively transport gas to significant role of “Gazprom” long-term contracts dealing with Kaliningrad. The Baltic projects of EU are based on geopolitical such mechanism) is due to price formation development on the grounds. However, they are attractive for the market. The main basis of the competition “gas — gas” on gas hubs. The target obstacle here is a lack of a joint project, while every EU member gas market model for Europe means domination of this price country is wishing to get profit from their own LNG enterprise formation mechanism, and it is presented by the European [19].
Recommended publications
  • GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3Rd Edition

    GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3Rd Edition

    1 2 GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3rd edition Authors and Contributors Namely in Alphabetical Order Amira Remadna Data Analysis and Research Diana Cueto ICT and Software Support Katrien Hermans Public Relations and Marketing Maria Arteaga Graphic Design & Administrative Support Mohamed Arafat Data Engineering and Curation Mona Shokripour, PhD Data Modelling and Integration Rixio Morales, PhD ICT Solutions Architect and Maintenance Roberto Arenas Lara, PhD Team Leader 3 Disclaimer The GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin (ASB) 2019 is the result of the data gathering collection and processing obtained directly from GECF Member and Observer Countries through the GECF Data Exchange Mechanism and in part using processed data from secondary sources examined and analysed by GECF Secretariat. The data contained in the GECF ASB 2019 are for information purposes only and do not necessary reflect the views of GECF Member and Observer Countries. Neither GECF Secretariat nor any of GECF Member and Observer Countries nor any of their agents or their employees are liable for any errors in or omissions from such information and materials and does not assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy completeness or reasonableness of data. Unless copyrighted by a third party, the information presented in the GECF ASB 2019 may be used and/or reproduced for research educational and other non-commercial purposes without GECF Secretariat’s prior written permission provided, fully acknowledging GECF as the copyright holder. Written permission from GECF Secretariat is required for any commercial use. The GECF ASB 2019 contains references to materials from third parties. GECF Secretariat will not be responsible for any unauthorized use of third party materials.
  • Significant Energy Assets on the Market (SEAM) Database on IHS

    Significant Energy Assets on the Market (SEAM) Database on IHS

    Significant Energy Assets on the Market (SEAM) Database on IHS Connect IHS Energy has launched a new database tool that actively tracks all known energy assets on the market and independently values them in a transparent manner utilizing more than 40,000 comparable transactions from IHS’s M&A database dating back to 1988. Assets on the Market database features include: • Searchable and exportable database covering all global and regional • Source documents including offering memos, prospectuses, and locations and all resource segments, detailing valuations and full press releases. operational data including reserves, production and acreage. • Full opportunity set currently totals approximately $250 billion • Contact information for sellers and advisors. Canada $25 B+ Europe $30 B+ Sellers Key Assets for Sale (or JV) Sellers Key Assets for Sale (or JV) Apache Corp. 1 million acres in Provost region of east-central Alberta Antrim Energy Skellig Block in Porcupine Basin Athabasca Oil Corp. 350,000 net prospective acres in Duvernay BNK Petroleum Joint venture partner sought for Polish shale gas play Canadian Oil Sands Rejects Suncor offer; reviewing strategic alternatives BP 16% stake in Culzean gas field in UK North Sea Centrica plc Offering 6,346 boe/d (86% gas) ConocoPhillips 24% stake in UK’s Clair oil field. Considering sale of Norwegian Cequence Energy Montney-focused E&P undergoing strategic review North Sea fields ConocoPhillips Western Canada gas properties Endeavour Int’l. Bankrupt; to sell Alba and Rochelle fields in the UK North
  • The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market

    The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market

    Secure Sustainable Together PARTNER COUNTRY SERIES The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market Secure Sustainable Together PARTNER COUNTRY SERIES The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market Anne-Sophie CORBEAU, Anne BRAAKSMA, Farid HUSSIN, Yayoi YAGOTO and Takuro YAMAMOTO INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. n Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement and dialogue with non-member countries, industry, international organisations and other stakeholders.
  • Nervous Money

    Nervous Money

    Nervous Money GLOBAL LNG TERMINALS UPDATE 2021Lydia Plante and Ted Nace GLOBAL ENERGY MONITOR NERVOUS MONEY Global AUTHORS Energy Lydia Plante is a Research Analyst at Global Energy Monitor. Monitor Ted Nace is Executive Director at Global Energy Monitor. ABOUT GLOBAL ENERGY MONITOR Global Energy Monitor (GEM) develops and shares informa- EDITING AND PRODUCTION tion on energy projects in support of the worldwide move- Edited by Mason Inman and James Browning. Design by ment for clean energy. Current projects include the Global Charlene Will and Mimi Heft. Additional design and page Coal Mine Tracker, Global Coal Plant Tracker, Global Fossil layout by David Van Ness. Infrastructure Tracker, Europe Gas Tracker, CoalWire news- letter, Global Gas Plant Tracker, Global Renewable Power ABOUT THE COVER Tracker, Global Steel Plant Tracker, Latin America Energy Photo of LNG tanker in Tokyo Bay. Copyright (c) Bill Chizek, Portal, and GEM.wiki. 2019. Courtesy of Getty Images. ABOUT THE GLOBAL FOSSIL INFRASTRUCTURE PERMISSIONS/COPYRIGHT TRACKER (GFIT) This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and The Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker is an online data- in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without base that identifies, maps, describes, and categorizes oil and special permission from the copyright holders, provided gas pipelines and terminals. Originally released by GEM in that acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this January 2019 and updated twice annually, the tracker uses publication may be made for resale or other commercial footnoted wiki pages to document each pipeline or termi- purpose without the written permission of the copyright nal.
  • Download Publication

    Download Publication

    JULY 2021 A Phantom Menace: Is Russian LNG a Threat to Russia’s Pipeline Gas in Europe? OIES PAPER: NG 171 Dr Vitaly Yermakov & Dr Jack Sharples, OIES The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2021 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-182-2 JULY 2021: A Phantom Menace: Is Russian LNG a Threat to Russia’s Pipeline Gas in Europe? ii Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Context: Russia on an international gas market transformed by LNG ............................................... 2 2. Russia adjusts its gas strategy to reflect growing LNG ambitions ...................................................... 4 3. From strategy to policy: the Russian regulatory context and the right of non-Gazprom companies to export LNG .............................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Key
  • Oil and Gas Delivery to Europe

    Oil and Gas Delivery to Europe

    Oil and gas delivery to Europe An Overview of Existing and Planned Infrastructures GOUVERNANCE EUROPÉENNE ET GÉOPOLITIQUE DE L’ÉNERGIE 4 bis Susanne NIES l es é tud es The French Institute for International Relations (Ifri) is France’s premier centre for independent research, information, and debates on today’s most important international issues. Founded in 1979 by Thierry de Montbrial, Ifri is an officially recognized organization (1901 law). It is not beholden to any administrative authority, independently chooses its projects, and regularly publishes its works. Ifri brings together, through studies and debates and in an interdisciplinary manner, political and economic decision-makers, researchers and experts from the global level. With its Brussels branch (Ifri Brussels), Ifri is one of the rare French think-tanks that is at the heart of European debates. * Site Int 1 © Ifri Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 5 I. THE CONSTRUCTION OF GAS AND OIL INFRASTRUCTURES IN EUROPE11 Summary.................................................................................................11 1. From the Discovery of Resources to the Construction of Separate East-West Networks .......................12 2. Developing Infrastructures in the Soviet Block, and their Extension to Western Europe .............................................16 3. Conclusion: Continuity and Ruptures.............................................19
  • Energy in the Eastern Mediterranean: Promise Or Peril?

    Energy in the Eastern Mediterranean: Promise Or Peril?

    ENERGY IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN: PROMISE OR PERIL? EGMONT PAPER 65 ENERGY IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN: PROMISE OR PERIL? Joint Report by the Egmont Institute and the Atlantic Council Sami ANDOURA and David KORANYI (EDS.) May 2014 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision-making process. President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc OTTE Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxessmaes.be ISBN 978 90 382 2376 6 D/2014/4804/162 U 2237 NUR1 754 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers.
  • The Tug of War Russia’S Response to Changes on the European Gas Market

    The Tug of War Russia’S Response to Changes on the European Gas Market

    50 THE TUG OF WAR RUSSIA’s RESPONSE TO CHANGES ON THE EUROPEAN GAS MARKET Szymon Kardaś NUMBER 50 WARSAW SEPTEMBER 2014 THE TUG OF WAR RUSSIA’S RESPONSE TO CHANGES ON THE EUROPEAN GAS MARKET Szymon Kardaś © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Anna Łabuszewska, Halina Kowalczyk TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GrAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Shutterstock DTP GroupMedia MAPS AND CHARTS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-49-6 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUCTION /7 I. CHANGes TAKinG PLAce on the EuroPEAN GAS MARKet And their conseQuences For RussiA /10 1. The legal and institutional changes and their consequences for Russia /10 2. Market changes in the EU’s gas sector and their consequences for Russia /14 2.1. Changes in supply and demand /14 2.2. The evolution of the gas trade rules /18 II. The RussiAN strAteGY in resPonse to the chANGes TAKinG PLAce on the EuroPEAN GAS MARKet /21 1. The offensive actions /22 1.1. Criticism of the legal and institutional changes /22 1.2. Investments in the gas storage and trade segment /25 1.3. The pipeline expansion /28 1.4. The diversification of the directions in Russian gas exports /30 1.5. Torpedoing the plans for shale gas extraction in the EU /31 2.
  • Gazprom's Investment Program Can Best Be Understood As a Way to Employ the Company's Entrenched Contractors at the Expense of Shareholders

    Gazprom's Investment Program Can Best Be Understood As a Way to Employ the Company's Entrenched Contractors at the Expense of Shareholders

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/24/2021 6:14:07 PM INVESTMENT RESEARCH ^ SBERBANK CIB RUSSIA | OIL AND GAS MAY 2018 Russian Oil and Gas Tickling Giants ■ Lukoil has finally outlined its capital allocation policy simply and clearly. The company will share the majority of its free cash flows with shareholders, either through dividends or buybacks. It will reinvest 80% of its capex in the Russian business, where it enjoys greater competencies. We believe that if the management follows through on its promises, the market will have no cause to demand the current double-digit free cash flow yield from the shares. We reiterate our BUY recommendation. Our $85 target price implies a circa 9.5% free cash flow yield at $65/bbl oil. Lukoil shares present an especially good bargain whenever the market offers them at or below the oil price. ■ Gazprom's investment program can best be understood as a way to employ the company's entrenched contractors at the expense of shareholders. The three major projects that will eat up half of the capex in the next five years - Power of Siberia, Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream - are deeply value-destructive. Moreover, we expect them to be followed by a large-scale revamp of the company's trunk pipeline infrastructure, which is aging fast. Such a project could keep capex elevated indefinitely. We retain our opportunistic BUY recommendation on the hope that a political reshuffle could bring about a reform effort, though we concede the chances are slim. ■ Rosneft has announced it will aim to lower capex and reduce net debt by $8 bln this year, or about 10%.
  • Global LNG Summary

    Global LNG Summary

    25 August 2017 Global Equity Research Natural Gas Global LNG Summary – Vol.12 Research Analysts MONTHLY David Hewitt 416 352 4583 [email protected] More from Doha (literally…) Mark Samter 61 2 8205 4537 ■ Qatar announces plan to increase capacity by 30% (23MTpa): [email protected] Following the blockade the current largest LNG producer announced plans Thomas Adolff to raise capacity to 100MTpa. (Link) 44 20 7888 9114 [email protected] ■ Our views: a) hard for Qatar to capture that much future market share, but b) Bhavesh Lodaya debottlenecking (circa 10MTpa) is likely and c) long term contract pricing is key; 212 325 2337 major price effect if Qatar softens its current contract price approach. [email protected] Gregory Lewis, CFA ■ Japanese Fair Trade Commission (FTC) publishes seminal paper on 212 325 6418 LNG procurement: challenging destination restriction and questioning [email protected] Take or Pay post project financing. (Link) Phillip Lindsay 44 20 7883 1644 ■ Our view: Some of the drafting appears balanced but some ideas appear less [email protected] ‘fair’. We expect sellers to comply with the balanced elements. Gregory Brown 44 20 7888 1440 ■ Korean FTC also now reviewing LNG contracts: Using the Japanese [email protected] FTC report as a template, it was reported in early August. (Link) ■ Our view: Buyer contagion re destination clauses was inevitable following the JFTC report. Asian spot liquidity will increase to some degree. ■ Sabine Pass Train 4 1st LNG: commissioning began in March and 1st LNG was achieved in July 2017.
  • Russian LNG Facilities: an Emerging Baltic Infrastructure

    Russian LNG Facilities: an Emerging Baltic Infrastructure

    OIL, GAS AND CHEMICAL HANDLING Russian LNG facilities: an emerging Baltic infrastructure Dr Daria Gritsenko, Researcher, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Proliferation of liquefied natural gas making it an attractive compliance added value” (Russian Energy Strategy (LNG) in the Baltic Sea region (BSR) option for operating in the Baltic 2030), which causes large-scale export of has recently been celebrated for two sulphur emission control area (SECA). un–or only slightly–processed gas and as reasons. Firstly, its flexible logistics allows Due to a diversity of potential uses a consequence lower incomes from sales. diversification of gas supply sources, (including maritime) and environmental Currently, six large-scale production and what with the escalation of political characteristics superior to oil-based energy facilities are scheduled for construction: tensions between the EU and Russia – sources, natural gas has been envisaged as Yamal, Gydan and Pechora in the prompted by the Ukrainian crisis – the a primary means to succeed in one of the Arctic, the Vladivostok and Sakhalin issue of energy independency has become most prominent contemporary challenges: projects in the Far East, and a Baltic particular relevant, as has the desire for energy transition. LNG plant in the Leningrad region gas supply diversification in the BSR. (Figure 3). According to the Russian Since LNG takes up only about 1/600th LNG facilities in the BSR Ministry of Energy, Russia is to increase the volume of natural gas, greater volumes The availability of LNG in the BSR its production capacity to 50-60 million can be stored at smaller facilities and has been limited due to the absence of MTpa by 2025.
  • American Gas to the Rescue? the IMPACT of US LNG EXPORTS on EUROPEAN SECURITY and RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY

    American Gas to the Rescue? THE IMPACT OF US LNG EXPORTS ON EUROPEAN SECURITY AND RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY By Jason Bordoff and Trevor Houser SEPTEMBER 2014 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us atenergypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu AMERICAN GAS TO THE RESCUE? THE IMPACT OF US LNG EXPORTS ON EUROPEAN SECURITY AND RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY By Jason Bordoff and Trevor Houser* SEPTEMBER 2014 *Jason Bordoff, a former White House energy adviser to President Barack Obama, is a professor and the founding director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University. Trevor Houser, partner at the Rhodium Group (RHG) and visiting fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, formerly served as a Senior Advisor at the US State Department.