DOCSLIB.ORG

Spisak Investitora Kojima Je Doneto Rešenje O Ozakonjenju U 2020 Godini

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spisak Investitora Kojima Je Doneto Rešenje O Ozakonjenju U 2020 Godini Spisak investitora kojima je doneto rešenje o ozakonjenju u 2020 godini 1. Ćebo Fadil Sivac, Teće krajiške brigade 4, stambeni i pomoćni objekat, 05-356-1349/2017 od 09.01.2020. 2. Ivanišević Milan Crvenka, Marka Oreškovića 24, ekonomski i pomoćni objekat, 05-356-13/2018 od 09.01.2020. 3. Simić Petar i Ivanka Kula, Novaka Pejčića 139, stambeni i četiri pomoćna objekta, 05-356- 1475/2019 od 10.01.2020. 4. Bojadžija Stanko i Savka Kula, Partizanska 14, dogr.st.objekta, stambeni objekat i četiri pomoćna objekta, 05-356-1202/2019 od 09.01.2020. 5. Bjekić Ranko Crvenka, Branka Radičevića 16, stambeni objekat i četiri pomoćna objekta, 05- 356-80/2019 od 08.01.2020. 6. Rokić Radojka Crvenka, Ivana Milutinovića 85, tri pomoćna objekta, 05-356-1701/2018 od 09.01.2020. 7. Đođić Veljko Kula, Blok 6B 5, pet pomoćnih objekata, 05-356-800/2019 od 10.01.2020. 8. Nedić Nemanja Sivac, Njegoševa 10,pomoćni objekat, 05-356-1212/2018 od 10.01.2020. 9. Abdić Safet i Seida, Ajko I dr. Crvenka, dva pomoćna i dva ekonomska objekta, 05-356- 271/2019 od 08.01.2020. 10. Borota Milka Kula, Petra Drapšina 179, dva pomoćna i ekonomski objekat, 05-356-685/2019 od 30.12.2019. 11. Momčilović Saša Sivac, Lovćenska 24, stamebeni objekat, 05-356-659/2018 od 13.01.2020. 12. Ćirović Dragica i Milan Sivac, Velimira Jakića 33, pomoćni objekat, 05-356-962/2018 od 13.01.2020. 13. Kovač Jovgen i Irina Ruski Krstur, Maršala Tita 20,dogr.st.objekat i pet pomoćnih objekata, 05- 356-893/2017 od 30.12.2019. 14. Vasiljuk Sofija Kula, Jakova Ignjatovića 48, dogr.st.objekta, četiri pomoćna objekta i tri ekonomska objekta, 05-356-1253/2019. 15. Marmat Ljubica Kula, Bratstava i Jedinstva 66, pomoćni objekat, 05-356-1066/2019 od 14.01.2020. 16. Stojanović Momir i Vida Kula, Svetozara Miletića 70, dogr.st.objekta i dva pomoćna objekta, 05- 356-971/2019 od 16.01.2020. 17. Radulj Vinko I Etelki Kula, Ise Sekicskog 83, dogradnja stambenog, ekonomski I pomoćni, 05- 356-323/2019 od 17.01.2020. 18. Fina Vasilj I Kovinka iz Kule, Petra Drapšina br.127, dogradnja stambenog, tri pomoćna I jedan ekonomski, 05-356-698/2019 od 08.01.2020. 19. Šimić Josip iz Kule, Pionirska br.53,tri stambena I dva pomoćna, 05-356-1024/2019 od 27.12.2019. 20. Crnković Vida iz Kule Milana Grozdića br.44, stambeni I dva pomoćna, 05-356-887-2019 od 20.01.2020 21. Belić Dragan iz Kule, Maršala Tita br.235, dva pomoćna 05-356-529/2019 od 21.01.2020. 22. Marjanac Stanislava iz Kule, 20. Oktobra br.10 dogradnja stambenog, tri pomoćna I jedan ekonomski 05-356-1152/2019 od 20.01.2020. 23. Belić Vladimir iz Kule, Maršala Tita br.233a, jedan pomoćni I jedan ekonomski 05-356-528/2019 od 21.01.2020. 24. Slepčev Bojan iz Sivca, 7. Vojvođananske brigade br.17, dograđeni stambeni objekat I dva pomoćna objekta 05-356-1131/2018 od 20.01.2020. 25. Pjekni Mihajlo iz Kule, ul.11.Oktobar br.3 jedan stambeni I jedan pomoćni objekat 05-356- 1046/2019 26. Roginer Barbara iz Kule, ul.Marka Miljanova br.1 dva pomoćna objekta 05-356-1142/2019 od 28.11.2019. 27. Pandurov Milovan iz Kule, ul.16.Divizije br.169 jedan stambeni I devet pomoćnih objekata 05- 356-1766/2018 o 21.01.2020. 28. Dobrijević Drago iz Crvenke ul.Marije Bursać br.28 dograđeni stambeni objekat, jedan pomoćni I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-37/2019 od 23.01.2020 29. Kovačević Stevo iz Kule, ul.Ise Sekickog br.108 dva stambena I tri ekonomska objekat 05-356- 321/2003 od 24.01.2020. 30. Galić Zorka, Galić Mirko, Stamenski Verica iz Lipar, ul.Đure Gajića br.6 jedan stambeni, dva pomoćna I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-381/2017 od 23.01.2020. 31. Vuković Božica I Zdravko iz Kule, ul.Stevana Doronjskog br.31 dogradnja stambenog objekta 05-356-952/2019 od 24.01.2020. 32. Vlahović Marjan iz Kruščića, ul. Maršala Tita br.105 jedan stambeni I dva pomoćna objekta 05- 356-729/2018 od 20.01.2020. 33. Tunguz Žarko iz Crvenke, ul.Marka Oreškovića br.47 dva stambena, tri pomoćna I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-311/2019 od 24.01.2020. 34. Marinković Mara iz Lipara, ul.Panonska br.6 dogradnja stambenog objekta 05-356-116/2017 od 27.01.2020. 35. Tvrdovski Regina iz Kule, ul.Novaka Pejčića br.184 jedan stambeni I jedan pomoćni objekat 05- 356-747/2017 od 28.01.2020. 36. Milutin Sanja iz Kule, ul.Đure Strugara br.70 dogradnja stambenog I dva pomoćna objekta 05- 356-1009/2019 od 28.01.2020 37. Pena Zdravko iz Crvenke, ul.Sime Šolaje br.3 dva pomoćna I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356- 621/2019 od 28.01.2020. 38. Rađenović Anka iz Lipara, ul.Đure Gajića br.5 dograđeni stambeni objekat, jedan pomoćni I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-276/2017 od 29.01.2020. 39. Varga Miroslav I Ana iz Ruskog Krstura, ul.Kanalska br.16 dva pomoćna I dva ekonomska objekta 05-356-207/2018 od 09.01.2020. 40. Dragaš Danilo iz Kule, ul.Maksima Gorkog br.66 dograđeni stambeni objekat 05-356-751/2019 od 31.01.2020. 41. Uzelac Mirko I Mirjana iz Crvenke, ul.Sime Šolaje br.25 pomoćni objekat 05-356-631/2019 od 03.02.2020. 42. Vitas Jovica iz Crvenke, ul.Nikole Tesle br.25 stambeni objekat 05-356-1/2020 od 05.02.2020. 43. Đačić Predrag iz Sivca, ul. Njegoševa br.96a dograđeni stambeni, tri pomoćna I vinogradarska kućica 05-356-1237/2018 od 31.01.2020. 44. Basara Darko iz Kule, ul.Alekse Šantića br.52 stambeni objekat I tri pomoćna objekta 05-356- 1237/2019 od 05.02.2020. 45. Trešnjić Milan iz Lipara, ul.Mire Ratković br.6 šest pomoćnih objekata I tri ekonomska objekta 05-356-218/2017 od 06.02.2020. 46. Radmanović Dragan iz Crvenke, ul.Đure Đakovića br.16 dva stambena I jedan pomoćni objekat 05-356-672/2018 od 07.02.2020. 47. Tomić Ljubica iz Crvenke, ul.Marka Oreškovića br.65, dva ekonomska I tri pomoćna objekta 05- 356-319/2019 od 07.02.2020. 48. Trivunović Petra, Darko I Dejan, ul.Matije Gupca br.6 jedan stambeni I dva pomoćna 05-356- 300/2017 od 07.02.2020. 49. Prus-Turi Marijana iz Sivca, Senteleki Kornela br.46 dva pomoćna I jedan ekonomski 05-356- 1146/2017 od 11.02.2020. 50. Vujičić Vojislav iz Sivca, ul.Veljka Vlahovića br.48 dograđeni stambeni objekat 05-356- 1252/2018 od 12.02.2020. 51. Semiz Nedeljko iz Crvenke, ul.Sime Šolaje br.10 dva stambena I dva ekonomska objekta 05- 356-657/2019 od 27.01.2020. 52. Sokola Ilona iz Kule, ul.Novaka Pejčića br.19 jedan stambeni, pet pomoćnih I jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-1262/2019 od 10.02.2020. 53. Ovari Tibor i Tereza iz Kule ul. Jakova Ignjatovića br.94 dograđeni stambeni I tri pomoćna objekta 05-356-1266/2019 od 11.02.2020. 54. Fekete Desa, Fekete Janko I Fekete Mirko iz Ruskog Krstura, Fruškogorska 117, tri pomoćna I tri ekonomska objekta 05-356-327/2019 od 12.02.2020. 55. Novaković Manojlo I Bojana iz Kule, ul. Petefi Šandora br.277 dva stambena I dva pomoćna objekta 05-356-116/2016 od 14.02.2020. 56. Egić Milan iz Crvenke, ul.Veljka Vlahovića br.7 jedan pomoćni I jedan ekonomski objekat 05- 356-1348/2018 od 14.02.2020. 57. Ristovski Goce iz Crvenke, ul.Žarka Zrenjanina br.46 jedan stambeni, dva pomoćna i jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-1620/2018 od 05.02.2020. 58. Mitić Vladimir iz Kule ul. Svetozara Miletića br.12 ekonomski objekat 05-356-20/2020 od 12.02.2020. 59. Krenjicki Ljubomir i Ljubica iz Ruskog Krstura, ul.Sivč Jovgena br.6 dva stambena i jedan pomoćni objekat 05-356-328/2019 od 21.02.2020. 60. Marević Slaven iz Crvenke, ul.Sime Šolaje br.18 stambeni, dva ekonomska i jedan pomoćni objekat 05-356-660/2019 od 25.02.2020. 61. Šorđan Anđelka I Šorđan Ljubiša iz Sivca, ul.Balkanska br.53 dograđeni stambeni i jedan pomoćni objekat 05-356-951/2018 od 26.02.2020. 62. Gajder Tibor iz Kule, ul.Novaka Pejčića br.100a, jedan stambeni i dva pomoćna objekta,05-356- 1328/2019 od 25.02.2020. 63. Prodanović Jelena iz Sivca, ul.Žarka Zrenjanjina br.100 jedan stambeni i četiri pomoćna objekta 05-356-709/2018 od 24.02.2020. 64. Šćepanović Rajko iz Kruščića, ul. Lenjinova br.165 dogradnja stambenog objekta, tri pomoćna i jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-1019/2017 od 24.02.2020. 65. Plavšić Miroslav iz Sivca, ul.Balkanska br.57 dogradnja stambenog, dva pomoćna i jedan ekonomski objekat 05-356-890/2017 od 24.02.2020. 66. Drinić Gojko,iz Crvenke, ul.Sime Šolaje br.7 dva stambena, jedan pomoćni i dva ekonomska objekta 05-356-623/2019 od 21.02.2020. 67. Stanković Nada I Stana iz Crvenke, ul. Žarka Zrenjanina br.151 četiri pomoćna objekta 05-356- 1655/2018 od 08.01.2020. 68. Karpa Štefan I Zlatica iz Kule, ul.16 Divizije br.115 dogradnja stambenog I sedam pomoćnih 05- 356-1311/2018 od 24.02.2020. 69. Isakov Jovan iz Kule, ul. Petefi Šandora br.203 dogradnja stambenog I četiri pomoćna objekta 05-356-577/2017 od 26.02.2020.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ruthenian Journey from the Carpathian Mountains to the Panonian Plain* M
    182 2014, № 2 (36) UDC 94(497.1) THE RUTHENIAN JOURNEY FROM THE CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS TO THE PANONIAN PLAIN* M. Fejsa Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Ruthenian Studies University of Novi Sad (Serbia) e-mail: [email protected] Scopus Author ID: 56031169500 Abstract Although the Ruthenians / Rusyns in Serbia (less than 15 000 members of the Ruthenian (Rusyn national community today) were cut off from their brethren in the Carpathian area they have managed to survive on the Panonian Plain. Comparing to the Ruthenians in all other countries the Ruthenians in Serbia have the highest level of minority rights. The Serbian / Vojvodinian authorities do their best to implement international conventions and there is a hope for the Ruthenians in Serbia / Vojvodina to preserve their culture, language and national identity in the future. Keywords: Ruthenians in Serbia / Vojvodina, Carpathian homeland, ethnocultural development, Ruthenian language, national minorities For centuries Ruthenians / Rusyns lived within the borders of Hungarian Kingdom. They lived in the northeast Hungarian counties, namely, in Zemplen, Saros, Abauj-Torna, Borsod, Szabolcs, Ung, Ugocsa, Maramaros and Gemer. Some 260 years ago, groups of Ruthenians began migrating south from their homeland in the Carpathian mountains to the Srem and Bačka regions of what is now Vojvodina in Serbia and Eastern Slavonia in Croatia (Фејса, 2010: 112-113). After the defeat and retreat of the Ottoman Empire from Bačka, Srem and Banat in 1699, the Austro-Hungarian authorities needed more population in the south of their state and supported colonization of Germans, Hungarians, Slovaks and others, among them Ruthenians as well (Gavrilović, 1977: 153).
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944
    Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 edited by: Sanela Schmid Milovan Pisarri Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid 1 Project partners: Project supported by: Forced Labour in Serbia 2 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 This collection of scientific papers on forced labour during the Second World War is part of a wider research within the project "Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour - Serbia 1941-1944", which was implemented by the Center for Holocaust Research and Education from Belgrade in partnership with Humboldt University, Berlin and supported by the Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" in Germany. ("Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft" - EVZ). 3 Impressum Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941-1944 Published by: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Publisher: Nikola Radić Editors: Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri Authors: Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid Proofreading: Marija Šapić, Marc Brogan English translation: Irena Žnidaršić-Trbojević German translation: Jovana Ivanović Graphic design: Nikola Radić Belgrade, 2018. Project partners: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Humboldt University Berlin Project is supported by: „Remembrance, Responsibility And Future“ Foundation „Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft“ - EVZ Forced Labour in Serbia 4 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 Contents 6 Introduction - Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri 12 Milovan Pisarri “I Saw Jews Carrying Dead Bodies On Stretchers”: Forced Labour and The Holocaust in Occupied Serbia 30 Zoran Janjetović Forced Labour in Banat Under Occupation 1941 - 1944 44 Milan Koljanin Camps as a Source of Forced Labour in Serbia 1941 - 1944 54 Photographs 1 62 Sabine Rutar Physical Labour and Survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Protest in Serbia: 'Most Fertile Land Is Given to Arabs'
    Search HOME ABOUT EVENT S GALLERY PUBLISH SUBSCRIBE HELP English/all Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most fertile land is given to Liberia: Cease governmental Arabs’ surveillance and harassment against human rights advocates defending land Published: 28 Jul 2014 and natural resource rights. Send Short URL: http://farmlandgrab.org/23773 letter to President Sirleaf Posted in: Abu Dhabi | Serbia | UAE Comments (0) Print Email this Tell T IAA-CREF to go deforestation inSerbia | 28 July 2014 and land grab-free! Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most f ertile land is given to Arabs’ Who's involved? Farmers from villages and settlements of Sivac, Kruscic, Lipar and Crvenka in Vojvodina are outraged at the Ministry Select Category of Agriculture of Serbia, which leased more than 3,000 hectares of the best arable land to the company “Al Farmers from Kula, Serbia block the Rafaved” from the United Arab Emirates for 250 euros per center of the municipality with their Posts Comments hectare. tractors, demanding an explanation of what is behind the decision of the Recent posts They demand that Ministry explain why this fertile land has Ministry of Agriculture to lease 3,000 been exempted from the lease program based on the hectares of the best arable land to the Huile de palme : Greenpeace cible preferential rent, or why the state has not offered the land UAE company Al Rawafed under the most HSBC to them first, and then the Arabs. Farmers from Kula, at the favorable conditions. 17 Jan 2017 | No Comments protest rally in front of the local municipality building, said that it is inconceivable that Serbia leases the land to “Al Rafaved” for only 250 euros per hectare, Niger-Arabie Saoudite : des without public bidding.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for Summary Reports in Accordance with Article 7 of the Protocol on Water and Health
    Template for summary reports in accordance with article 7 of the Protocol on Water and Health Executive summary Please provide an overall evaluation of the progress achieved in implementing the Protocol in your country during the reporting period. Please provide a short description of the main steps taken and highlight important achievements, key challenges, success factors and concrete good practice examples. Suggested length: maximum 2 pages The Republic of Serbia took over the chairmanship of the Bureau of the Protocol on water and health at the 4th session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol on water and health, held in Geneva in 2016. During its chairing of the Protocol, Serbia worked on the implementation of the national targets set under the Article 6 of the Protocol, as well as on the promotion of the Protocol at international and national level. Undertaking activities for implementing national target, Serbia has made the substantial progress in the field of small-scale water supply systems, WASH in schools and health care facilities, water safety planning and drinking water quality and equitable access to water and sanitation. The achievements are related to: • Closing the WASH knowledge gaps through the conduct of several systematic analyses, • Improving the national surveillance system on WASH in schools and health care facilities • Strengthening the legal framework for introducing the safe management of sanitation and drinking water. Conducting of systematic analysis Identified knowledge gaps in the baseline analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Atlas
    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Capital Elevation Coordination Support Section (Above mean sea level) Division of Operational Services UNHCR Country Office Croatia / National Office 3,250 to 4,000 metres Sources: / Liaison Office 2,500 to 3,250 metres UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping 1,750 to 2,500 metres © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. UNHCR Field Office As of December 2009 1,000 to 1,750 metres UNHCR Field Unit 750 to 1,000 metres The boundaries and names shown International boundary 500 to 750 metres and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement Main road 250 to 500 metres or acceptance by the United Nations. Secondary road 0 to 250 metres g Name_of_the_workspace.WOR !! Villach !! !! !! !! Below mean sea level !! !! Davograd Railway !! Marcali !! Orosháza !! Maribor !! Szank !! !! Cortina d'Ampezzo !! !! !! Mursko Sredisce !! Kalocsa!! Kecel !! Mindszent !! !! !! Kiskunmajsa !! !! Nagykanizsa !! Jesenice Tolna !! Kiskunhalas !! !! Ptuj !! !! Hajós !! !! Hódmezövásárhely!! !! !! !! Tolmezzo !! Böhönye !! !! !! !! !! !! Cakovec !! !! Sostanj !! !! !! Forraaskut !! !! Kaposvár !! !! Balotaszállás!! !! !! !! !! Mezöhe !! Varazdin HUNGARY!! !! Jánoshalma !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Legrad !! !! Ruzsa !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Gemona del Friuli !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Csurgó !! !! Szeged !! Kranj !! Celje !! Nagyatád !! !! !! Ivanec !! !! SLOVENIA !! !! !! Makó !! Durmanec !! Komló !! Maniago !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Koprivnica !! Baja !! Horgos !! Nadlac ! !! Belluno !!
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight
    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Citizens of Socialist Yugoslavia: Politics of Jewish Identity in a Socialist State, 1944-1974
    JEWISH CITIZENS OF SOCIALIST YUGOSLAVIA: POLITICS OF JEWISH IDENTITY IN A SOCIALIST STATE, 1944-1974 by Emil Kerenji A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Todd M. Endelman, Co-Chair Professor John V. Fine, Jr., Co-Chair Professor Zvi Y. Gitelman Professor Geoffrey H. Eley Associate Professor Brian A. Porter-Szűcs © Emil Kerenji 2008 Acknowledgments I would like to thank all those who supported me in a number of different and creative ways in the long and uncertain process of researching and writing a doctoral dissertation. First of all, I would like to thank John Fine and Todd Endelman, because of whom I came to Michigan in the first place. I thank them for their guidance and friendship. Geoff Eley, Zvi Gitelman, and Brian Porter have challenged me, each in their own ways, to push my thinking in different directions. My intellectual and academic development is equally indebted to my fellow Ph.D. students and friends I made during my life in Ann Arbor. Edin Hajdarpašić, Bhavani Raman, Olivera Jokić, Chandra Bhimull, Tijana Krstić, Natalie Rothman, Lenny Ureña, Marie Cruz, Juan Hernandez, Nita Luci, Ema Grama, Lisa Nichols, Ania Cichopek, Mary O’Reilly, Yasmeen Hanoosh, Frank Cody, Ed Murphy, Anna Mirkova are among them, not in any particular order. Doing research in the Balkans is sometimes a challenge, and many people helped me navigate the process creatively. At the Jewish Historical Museum in Belgrade, I would like to thank Milica Mihailović, Vojislava Radovanović, and Branka Džidić.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial, Cultural and Historical Entities in Bačka Ings Around It Mainly Date from the End of About When Mentioning Building of This City
    GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA No8; p 47-52 ence entities, cultural and ambience values of Lake Palić, Jodna banja (health resort) in Spatial, Cultural and Novi Sad and medieval fort in Bač Old City Centers Historical Entities in Bačka Old city centers are favorite staying plac- es for tourists, trade centers, cultural plac- es, places to meet people and entertain. In Bačka there is a significant number of inter- esting and preserved old city centers such as those in Bečej, Sombor, Novi Sad and Subotica. They were formed at the end of Besermenji, S.* 18th and the beginning of 19th century and are composed of institutions and buildings that belonged to rich people and officials. Abstract Spatial cultural-historical entities ultural values in Bačka are prod- are urban or rural settlements of their ucts of material and spiritual cul- Novi Sad parts. It is space with unmovable cultural Cture of different ethnic groups; fact Novi Sad is a relatively young city whose goods with distinct cultural and historical that makes them even more attractive. Di- existence goes back to the end of 17th cen- values. This group of cultural goods is very versity of cultural heritage in Bačka repre- tury when in 1748 it obtained the status numerous in this area of Bačka, and it is sents a tangible tourist product. This kind of of a Royal Borough by the decree of Maria very convenient to tourist presentation and diversity in Bačka and Vojvodina is unique Theresa. Today’s name of the city goes back valorization. In Bačka these are old town in whole Europe and that should be used as to that period and it means “new vineyard”.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of Local Population on the Importance of Events Nourishing Culture and Tradition of Croats in Vojvodina
    TURIZAM Volume 24, Issue 1 46–56 (2020) ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER Attitudes of Local Population on the Importance of Events Nourishing Culture and Tradition of Croats in Vojvodina Tatjana PivacA, Ivana BlešićA, Snežana BesermenjiA, Darko GavrilovićA Received: December 2019 | Accepted: March 2020 DOI: 10.5937/turizam24-25376 Abstract AP Vojvodina is a highly multi-ethnic community, with 29 nations and national or ethnic groups living on its territory. Croats make only 2.43% of the population of Vojvodina, but with their rich culture and tradition, they represent a significant potential for the development of Vojvodina’s cultural tourism. The richness of customs is best represented through numer- ous events that take place in areas with the majority of Croatian population. The paper pre- sents the results of a survey conducted to determine how informed the population of Vojvodina is about the maintenance and significance of events of Croats in Vojvodina. A sample of 158 respondents was obtained. Descriptive statistical analysis, t-test of independent samples and analysis of variance ANOVA were used to analyse the obtained data. Keywords: Croats of Vojvodina, events, attitudes, local population, Vojvodina Introduction Vojvodina is defined as an autonomous province of citizens living in it, within the Republic of Serbia. AP Vojvodina covers 24.4% of the territory of the Republic of Serbia or 21.588 km². According to the last census from 2011, AP Vojvodina has a population 1.931.809, which makes 21.6% of the total population of the Republic of Serbia. The diversity of Vojvodina is contrib- uted by 29 ethnic groups, the most numerous being Serbs, Hungarians, Romanians, Bunje- vci, Slovaks, Croats and Ruthenians.
    [Show full text]
  • German’ Communities from Eastern Europe at the End of the Second World War
    EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION EUI Working Paper HEC No. 2004/1 The Expulsion of the ‘German’ Communities from Eastern Europe at the End of the Second World War Edited by STEFFEN PRAUSER and ARFON REES BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO (FI) All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author(s). © 2004 Steffen Prauser and Arfon Rees and individual authors Published in Italy December 2004 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico (FI) Italy www.iue.it Contents Introduction: Steffen Prauser and Arfon Rees 1 Chapter 1: Piotr Pykel: The Expulsion of the Germans from Czechoslovakia 11 Chapter 2: Tomasz Kamusella: The Expulsion of the Population Categorized as ‘Germans' from the Post-1945 Poland 21 Chapter 3: Balázs Apor: The Expulsion of the German Speaking Population from Hungary 33 Chapter 4: Stanislav Sretenovic and Steffen Prauser: The “Expulsion” of the German Speaking Minority from Yugoslavia 47 Chapter 5: Markus Wien: The Germans in Romania – the Ambiguous Fate of a Minority 59 Chapter 6: Tillmann Tegeler: The Expulsion of the German Speakers from the Baltic Countries 71 Chapter 7: Luigi Cajani: School History Textbooks and Forced Population Displacements in Europe after the Second World War 81 Bibliography 91 EUI WP HEC 2004/1 Notes on the Contributors BALÁZS APOR, STEFFEN PRAUSER, PIOTR PYKEL, STANISLAV SRETENOVIC and MARKUS WIEN are researchers in the Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute, Florence. TILLMANN TEGELER is a postgraduate at Osteuropa-Institut Munich, Germany. Dr TOMASZ KAMUSELLA, is a lecturer in modern European history at Opole University, Opole, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Date 22.12.2005 Project# 353 FINAL REPORT: SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER AFFECTED BY HIGH ARSENIC CONTENTS IN 3 VOJVODINIAN REGIONS BOOK 1: Executive Summary City of Vienna MA 31 i. TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK I 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 1.12 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1.12 1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................... 1.12 1.2.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................. 1.12 1.2.2 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 1.13 1.3 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................. 1.14 1.4 LEGAL FEASIBILITY............................................................................................................ 1.18 1.5 REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES ........................................................................................ 1.18 1.5.1 European Drinking Water Directive .............................................................................. 1.18 1.5.2 Regulations for Groundwater Protection....................................................................... 1.19
    [Show full text]