DOCSLIB.ORG

Population, Households and Dwellings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population, Households and Dwellings Municipalities, 31 March 2002 2002 Census REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia ISBN 86-84433-51-3 2002 Census of Population, Households and Dwellings POPULATION NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by localities 1 Belgrade, February 2003 Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 1 2002 Census Municipalities, 31 March 2002 CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 312.117(497.11)”2002” POPULATION: 2002 Census of population, households and dwellings, 1, National or Ethnic affiliation : data by localities. - Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic Serbia, 2006 (Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia). - 219 str: : ilust. ; 29 cm Na vrhu nasl. str.: Republic of Serbia. - Na nasl. str. god. izdavanja: 2003. - Tiraž - 100. - Str. 3: Preface / Zoran Jančić ISBN 86-84433-51-3 a) Србија – Становништво – Национална структура – 2002 – Статистика COBISS.SR-ID 132162316 Pursuant to the opinion by the Ministry for Science, Technology and Development of the Republic of Serbia, no 413-00-428/2002-01 of 7 June 2002 this publication is general excise tax exempted. 2 Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia Municipalities, 31 March 2002 2002 Census PREFACE In this book the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia announces the final Census data on national or ethnic affiliation of the population of the central Serbia and the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, according to the state as of day 31 March 2002. On the territory of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohia, the Census will be accomplished only when all necessary conditions will be fulfilled. The data are shown according to localities, municipalities and districts, relative to the valid administrative-territorial state on 1 January 2002. In the first table review, apart from the data for the City of Belgrade, the data for the locality of Belgrade are also given separately, as a unique anatropous-geographical entity, the parts of which are comprised in the territorial composition of ten municipalities of the City of Belgrade, of which six municipalities (Vračar, Zvezdara, Novi Beograd, Rakovica, Savski Venac and Stari Grad) extend exclusively over the parts of the unique locality of Belgrade. All urban municipalities are designated with the sign “u” that divides them from “other” localities. Also, all data are distributed according to the type of locality, or cumulative rows “urban” and “other” are given, starting from municipalities to the highest territorial level. Along with the books of Census data and other publications, the respective data will be accessible to the widest circle of users through other media also (CD, INTERNET, etc). Belgrade, February 2003 Director, Zoran Jančić Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 3 2002 Census Municipalities, 31 March 2002 4 Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia Municipalities, 31 March 2002 2002 Census CONTENTS Preface .................................................................... 3 South Banat District ........................................... 32 Alibunar .............................................................. 32 Methodological explanations ................................ 7 Bela Crkva .......................................................... 32 Vršac .................................................................. 32 Charts: The most represented ethnic communities, by Kovačica ............................................................. 34 municipalities.......................................................... 11 Kovin .................................................................. 34 Opovo ................................................................. 34 Graph: The most represented ethnic communities - Pančevo ............................................................. 34 Republic of Serbia, Central Serbia, Vojvodina ....... 13 Plandište ............................................................ 36 Population by national or ethnic affiliation – Review: District of West Bačka ........................................ 36 Republic of Serbia, Central Serbia, Vojvodina, City of Apatin ................................................................. 36 Belgrade and Belgrade - locality ........................... 14 Kula .................................................................... 36 Odžaci ................................................................ 36 Population by national or ethnic affiliation........ 16 Sombor ............................................................... 38 Republic of Serbia................................................ 16 South Bačka District .......................................... 38 Central Serbia ........................................................ 16 Bač ..................................................................... 38 Vojvodina ............................................................... 16 Bačka Palanka ................................................... 38 Bački Petrovac ................................................... 40 City of Belgrade.................................................... 16 Beočin ................................................................ 40 Barajevo .............................................................. 16 Bečej .................................................................. 40 Voždovac ............................................................ 16 Vrbas .................................................................. 40 Vračar ................................................................. 16 Žabalj ................................................................. 40 Grocka ............................................................... 16 Novi Sad - city .................................................... 40 Zvezdara ............................................................ 18 Srbobran ............................................................ 42 Zemun ................................................................ 18 Sremski Karlovci ................................................ 42 Lazarevac .......................................................... 18 Temerin .............................................................. 42 Mladenovac ........................................................ 20 Titel .................................................................... 42 Novi Beograd ..................................................... 20 Obrenovac ......................................................... 20 Srem District ....................................................... 42 Palilula ............................................................... 22 Inđija ................................................................... 42 Rakovica ............................................................ 22 Irig ...................................................................... 44 Savski Venac ..................................................... 22 Pećinci ................................................................ 44 Sopot ................................................................. 22 Ruma .................................................................. 44 Stari Grad ........................................................... 24 Sremska Mitrovica .............................................. 46 Čukarica ............................................................. 24 Stara Pazova ...................................................... 46 Šid ...................................................................... 46 North Bačka District............................................. 24 Bačka Topola ..................................................... 24 Maćva District ..................................................... 48 Mali Iđoš ............................................................. 24 Bogatić ............................................................... 48 Subotica ............................................................. 26 Vladimirci ............................................................ 48 Koceljeva ............................................................ 50 Central Banat District ......................................... 26 Krupanj ............................................................... 50 Žitište ................................................................. 26 Loznica ............................................................... 52 Zrenjanin ............................................................ 26 Ljubovija ............................................................. 54 Nova Crnja ......................................................... 28 Mali Zvornik ........................................................ 54 Novi Bečej .......................................................... 28 Šabac ................................................................. 54 Sečanj ................................................................ 28 Kolubara District ................................................. 56 North Banat District ........................................... 28 Valjevo ............................................................... 56 Ada .................................................................... 28 Lajkovac ............................................................. 60 Kanjiža ............................................................... 30 Ljig ..................................................................... 60 Kikinda ............................................................... 30 Mionica ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Characteristics of Market Production of Fruit and Grapes in Serbia
    REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2018 UDC: 913:[346.54:641.13+634.8.076](497.11) doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801201S REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA1 Simo Stevanović2, Snežana Stevanović 3, Svjetlana Janković-Šoja4 Summary In the paper analyzes the trends in the development of market production of fruit (on the example of the apple and the plum) and grapes in Serbia from 1976 to 2015. The grouping of the Serbian districts according to the degree of the market production of fruit and grapes in 2015 was performed by a cluster analysis, on the basis of the six features of production, five features of the capacities, and five features of development. According to the data for 2015, the degree of the marketability of apples in Serbia was 47.7%, plums 15.9%, and grapes 18.3%. The Serbia-North Region shows a surplus in the production of apples, and a deficit in the production of plums (-181.7%) and grapes (-99.1%). The Serbia-South Region has a surplus in the production of the analyzed kinds of fruit (the apple accounting for 43.0%, and the plum 50.9%) and grapes (45.2%). Keywords: market production of fruit, economic development, I-distance, cluster analysis JEL: Q-13, O-11 Introduction Serbia is a traditionally significant producer of all kinds of continental fruit and grapes. Given the commercial, technological and nutritive characteristics of fruit production, 1 The paper is part of the research conducted on the “Serbia’s Rural Labor Market and Rural Economy – Income Diversification and Poverty Reduction” Project, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja Provided Their Contributions Both in English and Serbian
    Environment and sustainable rural tourism in four regions of Serbia Southern Banat.Central Serbia.Lower Danube.Eastern Serbia - as they are and as they could be - November 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Impressum PUBLISHER: TRANSLATORS: Th e United Nations Environment Marko Stanojević, Jasna Berić and Jelena Programme (UNEP) and Young Pejić; Researchers of Serbia, under the auspices Prof. Branko Karadžić, Prof. Milica of the joint United Nations programme Jovanović Popović, Violeta Orlović “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja provided their contributions both in English and Serbian. EDITORS: Jelena Beronja, David Owen, PROOFREADING: Aleksandar Petrović, Tanja Petrović Charles Robertson, Clare Ann Zubac, Christine Prickett CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Prof. Branko Karadžić PhD, GRAPHIC PREPARATION, Prof. Milica Jovanović Popović PhD, LAYOUT and DESIGN: Ass. Prof. Vladimir Stojanović PhD, Olivera Petrović Ass. Prof. Dejan Đorđević PhD, Aleksandar Petrović MSc, COVER ILLUSTRATION: David Owen MSc, Manja Lekić Dušica Trnavac, Ivan Svetozarević MA, PRINTED BY: Jelena Beronja, AVANTGUARDE, Beograd Milka Gvozdenović, Sanja Filipović PhD, Date: November 2012. Tanja Petrović, Mesto: Belgrade, Serbia Violeta Orlović Lovren PhD, Vojislavka Šatrić. Th e designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Acknowledgments Th is publication was developed under the auspices of the United Nations’ joint programme “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Development“, fi nanced by the Kingdom of Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDGF).
    [Show full text]
  • Tourists Manifestations in the Development of Culinary Tourism in Banat (Vojvodina, Serbia)
    TOURISTS MANIFESTATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULINARY TOURISM IN BANAT (VOJVODINA, SERBIA) Bojana KALENJUK 1, Dragan TEŠANOVIĆ 1, Snježana GAGIĆ2, Nikola VUKSANOVIĆ 1, Marija ŠKRINJAR3, 1University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad, Serbia 2University of Alfa, College of professional studies in management and business communication, Sremski Karlovci, Serbia 3 University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Food Technology, Novi Sad, Serbia E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Abstract: Vojvodina has a large number of tourist manifestations of food and drinks which attract many domestic and foreign tourists. Tourist manifestations represent an integral part of gastronomic tourism, which is defined as the tourist visit of primary or secondary food producers, restaurants for producing and serving food and certain destinations for tasting and experiencing the regional specialties, where food and drink are primary motivation for travel. Recognizing the importance of tourist manifestations in the development of tourism this manuscript has a task to investigate the tourist manifestations in the territory of Banat, in order to determine the most frequent types of events in districts (Kikinda - Northern Banat District, Zrenjanin – Middle Banat district and Pancevo - South Banat District) and period of taking place of events. The research will include analysis of food and drink events in 2011. Keywords: tourist events, manifestation, food, beverage, culinary tourism, Vojvodina, Banat. 1. INTRODUCTION Tourist manifestations contribute greatly to the formation of the destinations image, increasing the cohesion of the local community and its pride, and improving their quality of life (Bjeljac et al., 2003; Bjeljac, Ž., 2004; Hadžić, O., Bjeljac, Ž., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Pancevo Agro Biomass Supply Study, 2019
    AGRO-BIOMASS POTENTIAL AND LOGISTICS STUDY FOR SUPPLYING THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANY “GREJANJE-PANČEVO” Photos by Foragrobio cc doo © 2019 GIZ DKTI Prepared for: AMBERO Consulting Gesellschaft mbH and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH DKTI- Development of a Sustainable Bioenergy Market in Serbia Terazije 23/V 11000 Beograd Prepared by: Vojislav Milijić, Foragrobio cc doo Sumska 9-III/1, Subotica May 2019 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ DKTI (GIZ) Programme "Development of sustainable bioenergy market in Serbia": Agro-Biomass Potential and Logistics Study for Supplying the Public Utility Company “Grejanje – Pančevo” ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents List of tables List of figures List of charts List of abbreviations Table of Contents List of abbreviations.........................................................................................................................................3 1. Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................4 2. Definition of Tasks........................................................................................................................................5 3. Methodology .................................................................................................................................................6 4.
    [Show full text]
  • SWOT Analysis of Wine Tourism Development Opportunities in the Trstenik Vineyard District – Hotel and Tourism Management, 2020, Vol
    Stojković, J., Milićević, S. – SWOT analysis of wine tourism development opportunities in the Trstenik vineyard district – Hotel and Tourism Management, 2020, Vol. 8, No. 1: 59-67. Original Scientific Paper UDC: 338.483.11:[634.8+663.2(497.11) doi: 10.5937/menhottur2001059S SWOT analysis of wine tourism development opportunities in the Trstenik vineyard district Jelena Stojković1*, Sneţana Milićević1 1 University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjaĉka Banja, Serbia Abstract: Serbia is traditionally a wine-growing region and it is slowly approaching those countries that have benefited from the development of this type of tourism. The subject of this paper is the analysis of the Trstenik vineyard district, whose wine-growing areas, although within a small municipality in Central Serbia, are one of the largest in the country within the Three Morava Rivers region. The Trstenik vineyard district can take a chance and find its place in this specific tourism market. The aim of the paper is to present all the strengths and opportunities, but also the threats and weaknesses for the development of wine tourism in this wine district. This is presented through SWOT analysis. All the results could be used to make this municipality as wine tourism destination in Serbia. Keywords: Trstenik vineyard district, wine tourism, vineyards, municipality Trstenik, tourism destination JEL classification: Z30, Z32 SWOT anali a mogućnosti a ra voj vinskog turi ma u Trsteničkom vinogorju Saţetak: Srbija je tradicionalno vinorodno podruĉje i polako se pribliţava onim zemljama koje su iskoristile veliku šansu u razvoju ove vrste turizma. Predmet rada je analiza Trsteniĉkog vinogorja koji je jedan od najvećih vinogradarskih regiona u zemlji u okviru rejona Tri Morave.
    [Show full text]
  • ASF in Europe Under the GF-Tads Umbrella 16Th Meeting (SGE ASF16) November 2020 ASF Serbian Experience EARLY REACTION and CONTROL MEASURES in DOMESTIC PIGS
    Standing Group of Experts on ASF in Europe under the GF-TADs umbrella 16th meeting (SGE ASF16) November 2020 ASF Serbian experience EARLY REACTION AND CONTROL MEASURES IN DOMESTIC PIGS S E R B I A NUMBER OF MARKED AND REGISTERED PIGS IN RS 2019. Total Number of marked pigs Holding Small Medium Big farm farm comercial DISTRICT farm BEOGRAD 10,587 25,310 7,348 26,155 69,400 BORSKI 5,785 1,010 619 7,414 BRANIČEVSKI 6,293 10,445 4,630 51,409 72,777 JABLANIČKI 7,862 6,859 1,748 5,399 21,868 JUŽNO-BANATSKI 10,898 7,526 3,825 139,800 162,049 JUŽNO-BAČKI 7,917 34,670 35,542 284,113 362,242 KOLUBARSKI 12,410 37,092 11,277 1,714 62,493 MAČVANSKI 16,539 146,467 153,052 101,234 417,292 MORAVIČKI 4,381 5,914 5,935 568 16,798 NIŠAVSKI 5,391 7,192 1,982 1,498 16,063 PIROTSKI 4,635 1,562 111 1,073 7,381 PODUNAVSKI 5,258 13,692 12,101 49,577 80,628 POMORAVSKI 5,446 18,212 7,440 530 31,628 PČINJSKI 2,637 392 134 3,163 RASINSKI 12,801 53,974 7,756 4,956 79,487 RAŠKI 3,743 3,577 2,897 14,704 24,921 SEVERNO-BANATSKI 8,201 20,665 19,356 172,764 220,986 SEVERNO-BAČKI 2,891 35,074 58,912 230,311 327,188 SREDNJE-BANATSKI 16,568 24,889 11,348 54,161 106,966 SREMSKI 11,792 105,698 132,770 212,914 463,174 TOPLIČKI 1,082 1,224 115 23,172 25,593 ZAJEČARSKI 7,236 8,983 651 37,592 54,462 ZAPADNO-BAČKI 4,693 37,385 30,990 128,234 201,302 ZLATIBORSKI 4,550 1,282 552 6,384 ŠUMADIJSKI 13,135 14,941 4,079 15,285 47,440 Grand Total 192,731 624,035 515,170 1,557,163 2,889,099 Domestic pigs population • in 2019, a total of 74,985 pig holdings were registered in Serbia, of which: • 50,1251 kept up to 10 pigs, • 21, 741 kept 10 to 100 pigs, • medium commercial farms of 100 to 500 pigs- 2,721 • large commercial farms with more than 500 pigs- 398.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Europe As Semi-Border and Semi-Urban Region and Its Marketisation
    CENTRAL EUROPE AS SEMI-BORDER AND SEMI-URBAN REGION AND ITS MARKETISATION JAN SUCHÁČEK Introduction or Brief Description of Central Europe The notion of ‘Central Europe’ has traditionally attracted much attention. Numerous issues connected with this enormously complex and appealing region go beyond the extent of this article; however, it should be stated that, as defi ned by Milan Kundera, the area was “geographically in the Centre, culturally in the West, and politically in the East”1. Various cultural and political streams, often almost antagonistic but at the same time intensely interconnected, have shaped the character of this territory. Before 1989, political arguments that stressed the absurdity of two separate Europes were prevailing in the context of the idea of a Central Europe. Since 1989, one has been able to observe the slow return of common pluralistic values so typical of Central European culture. Over the past years we have witnessed the rebirth of the idea of Central European partnership, which can be perceived as a process of positioning in the context of EU enlargement. The region of Central Europe2 is currently infl uenced by two relevant processes. The fi rst one is a spontaneous process of economic and social restructuring. It involves the whole Central European space. The second is a specifi c process of transition in Central Eastern Europe that includes a major part of Central Europe. The problem of the transitional part of Central Europe consists mainly in the discrepancy between formal and informal institutions3 1 Tomaszewski, A.: Central Europe: Cultural Property and Cultural Heritage, In: Central Europe: A New Dimension of Heritage, ICC, Cracow, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of the Copper Mining Activities in Majdanpek on Danube
    INFLUENCE OF THE COPPER MINING ACTIVITIES IN MAJDANPEK ON DANUBE RIVER Milan Trumić, Grozdanka Bogdanović, Maja Trumić, Bogdana Vujić, Zaklina Tasić, Ljubisa Andrić, Boban Spalović quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising works financed thru the Interreg IPA CBC Romania Serbia Programme 2014 - 2020 Project acronym: AEPS Project eMS code: RORS-462 Project webpage: http://aeps.upt.ro TIMISOARA, 2021 ISBN 978-973-0-33596-5 Contents Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 1. National Park Đerdap ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Description of the Pek river basin ........................................................................................... 6 1.3. Mali Pek river basin ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Veliki Pek river basin ............................................................................................................... 7 1.5. The Porečka River ................................................................................................................... 8 2. Pollutants
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling and Other Useful Information About Krusevac
    XII SYMPOSIUM ON FORAGE CROPS OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA “Forage crops basis of the sustainable animal husbandry development“ th th May 26 to 28 2010, Kruševac, Serbia INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE FORAGE CROPS SOCIETY OF CROPS SERBIA ABOUT KRUŠEVAC The city of Kruševac is located the central part of the Republic of Serbia. It covers the area of 854km² and includes 101 townships and 145.000 inhabitants in total. The Kruševac urban area has about 65,000 inhabitants. It is located in the valleys of West Morava River, Rasina River, between the Jastrebac, Kopaonik and Željin mountains. The City of Kruševac is the centre of the Rasina District, which includes municipalities Aleksandrovac, Brus, Varvarin, Trstenik and Ćićevac. As a city rich in tradition and centuries of history, once the medieval Serbian capital, Kruševac today is a modern city, economic, administrative, cultural, health, education, information and sports centre of importance for the Rasina District and the Republic of Serbia. INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE CROPS, TRG KOSTURNICE 50, KRUŠEVAC, SERBIA Tel: +381 37 442 583, +381 37 442 590 Fax: +381 37 441 295 Manager: +381 37 423 863 E‐mail: [email protected] www.ikbks.com XII SYMPOSIUM ON FORAGE CROPS OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA “Forage crops basis of the sustainable animal husbandry development“ th th May 26 to 28 2010, Kruševac, Serbia INSTITUTE FOR FORAGE FORAGE CROPS SOCIETY OF CROPS SERBIA -----History----- The City of Kruševac was founded as the capital city of Serbia by Prince Lazar in the 1371. The name was first mentioned in the 1387 in the decree ordered by Prince Lazar for the regulation of trade agreements with merchants from Dubrovnik.
    [Show full text]
  • Mlade Arhitekte Daju Ideje I
    Lokalna samouprava u gradu kraj Dunava i jesenje Odr`an Sajam dane koristi za radove energetske efikasnosti Veliko Gradi{te Obnovljivi izvori kao ogromno i energetska gradili{te Strana IV efikasnost Strana VI Godina deveta, broj 633, dodatak za Brani~evski okrug zz PETAK, 4. novembar 2016, broj 6976, godina XX, cena 40 din, 20 den, 1 KM, 0,5 EUR (CG), 5 kuna www.danas.rs Gradona~elnik Bane Spasovi} posetio Po`areva~ku gimnaziju i O[ „Desanka Maksimovi}“ Planove za investicije valja podneti na vreme z Slede}e godine grad }e izdvojiti verovatno i vi{e od 100 miliona za obrazovne ustanove Strane IV-V Po~ela da radi Radionica za idejna re{enja urbane rekonstrukcije grada Mlade arhitekte daju ideje i „kreiraju“ varo{ z Zna~ajan segment Radionice jeste i istra`ivanje na temu kakve su preovla|uju}e potrebe gra|ana, kako bi i njihovi predlozi bili po meri stanovnika Po`arevac - Ve} najavljena odlu~na Ova radionica okuplja studente iz - O~ekujemo mnogo idejnih re{enja namera vlasti u Po`arevcu da se prak- pojedinih oblasti arhitekture, koji jer imamo ljude iz razli~itih struka. Ima- ti~no radi na podizanju funkcionalno- imaju za cilj sagledavanje funkcional- li smo predavanja iz istorije ovog kraja, sti grada i njegovom lep{em izgledu, no-prostornih potencijala sa aspekta geografije i drugih oblasti, kako bi oni dobija i konkretne forme, pa je po~e- savremene urbane rekonstrukcije u ci- koji su prvi put u Po`arevcu mogli da la da radi Radionica za idejna re{enja lju pronala`enja odr`ivog urbanisti~- steknu op{ti utisak o ovom gradu.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on EU Boards on Project Site Locations for MIASP, MISP CARDS2006, MISP IPA2008 and MISP IPA2010 Municipal Infrastructure Projects
    REPORT ON EU BOARDS ON PROJECT SITE LOCATIONS FOR MIASP, MISP CARDS2006, MISP IPA2008 AND MISP IPA2010 MUNicipaL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS REPORT ON EU BOARDS ON PROJECT SITE LOCATIONS FOR MIASP, MISP CARDS2006, MISP IPA2008 AND MISP IPA2010 MUNicipaL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS MISP - MUNicipaL INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT PROGRAMME IPA 2008 13 September 2012 Visibility Report CRIS 223 – 292 (08/SER01/13/21) P2006_52 PR Activities Document title Report on EU Boards on Project Site Locations Visibility Report Document short title Report on EU Site Boards for MIASP, MISP CARDS2006, MISP IPA2008 and MISP IPA2010 Municipal Infrastructure Projects Status Report Date 13 September 2012 Project name MISP IPA2008 Programme Project number CRIS 223 – 292 (08/SER01/13/21) Client Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia Reference number P2006_52 PR Activities Drafted by Ms. Sanja Babić, Public Relations Expert/Event Manager, MISP 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1. MISP Programme ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. List of Infrastructure Projects financed and supervised under MIASP/ MISP ��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 1.3. Graphic layouts for preparation of EU Site Boards/Display Panels ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]