Reviews Amerikastudien / American Studies 59.4 N E , 1812: War And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reviews Amerikastudien / American Studies 59.4 N E , 1812: War And Reviews ★ Amerikastudien / American Studies 59.4 N E , 1812: War and the Passions boosted American patriotism and why it has of Patriotism (Philadelphia: U of Pennsylva - been publicly remembered as an American nia P, 2012), xvii + 315 pp. success story. Paul Gilje, Professor of United States History at the University of Oklahoma, A L , The Challenge: Britain in the third book under review in this article, Against America in the Naval War of 1812 by contrast, seems at rst glance to keep up (London: Faber and Faber, 2012), 538 pp. the traditional American narrative of the War P G, Free Trade and Sailors’ Rights in of 1812 when emphasizing Britain’s violations the War of 1812 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, of American neutral rights and impressment 2013), 437 pp. on the high seas as the causes for America’s declaration of war. Possibly without intend - The traditional American narrative of the ing to do so, however, he also raises troubling War of 1812 emphasizes that British maritime questions about the legacy of the American practices—mainly interferences with Ameri - Revolution when he implies that the asser - can neutral trade and the impressment of sea- tion of the democratic principles that lie at the men from American merchant ships on the bottom of American identity and that were high seas—caused severe Anglo-American symbolized by free trade and sailors’ rights al - tensions in the early nineteenth century such lowed for no other alternative than to declare that Republicans—in power in the United war against the former mother country. In this States since 1801—felt the need to declare war way, Gilje’s monograph also, albeit indirectly, against the former mother country in 1812 undermines the standard interpretation by in order to defend the nation’s honor. In the nding the war’s origins in Americans’ demo - following so called ‘Second War of Indepen - cratic mentality rather than in British mari- dence,’ the U.S. Navy was able to win some time practices. impressive naval battles against the hitherto Eustace tries to explain why the war be - undefeated Royal Navy, the traditional story came “a popular success” (xi) by analyzing it continues, and thus made Great Britain ac - not as a “military” but as a “cultural event” knowledge American sovereignty in the Trea- (x). According to her, the United States went ty of Ghent in 1814. The War of 1812 produced to war primarily to expand westwards and to military heroes such as James Lawrence, Da - drive Indians off their lands in the West. The vid Porter, Stephen Decatur, and Andrew displacement of the Native populations, more - Jackson and thus promoted American na - over, was a goal that united white Americans tionalism, such that the initially divisive war of all stripes. Eustace analyzes how Republi - ushered in the so-called Era of Good Feel - can war supporters portrayed Indians as ruth- ings, the classical American interpretation less savages that mercilessly butchered white concludes. children and abducted and raped white wom - On the occasion of the bicentennial of the en and how Republicans thus felt justied to conict, three works appeared that fundamen - expel Indians from their lands or even to ex - tally call the assumptions of this narrative into terminate them. “The tale of the bloodthirsty question. Nicole Eustace, Associate Professor savage bent on violating women and children of History at New York University, called the in the pursuit of a population competition that war “a grave American embarrassment” (31), bordered on genocide usefully projected U.S. in which diplomatically and militarily the goals and tactics onto the nation’s enemies” United States achieved nothing and which was (151). As their resistance was broken in the marked by disastrous military failures on the war and as they lost protection by the British American side. Andrew Lambert, Professor who did not insist on taking their Indian al - of Naval History at King’s College, London, lies’ interests into account in the peace nego- found that “after a litany of defeats all along tiations, Republicans felt that their most im- the Canadian border, the capture and destruc - portant war aim had been achieved. tion of Washington, bankruptcy and the loss In a fascinating chapter on the public inter - of several warships, including the national pretation of the Battle of New Orleans—fought agship; the peace settlement had been a for - in January 1815 after the so called ‘Christmas tunate escape” for the American government Peace’ of 1814 had already been concluded— (1-2). As both authors concur that America Eustace exposes that Republicans falsely did not ‘win’ the War of 1812, they seek to claimed that the British soldiers had allegedly understand—yet in different ways—why it been promised the women of New Orleans as Amerikastudien / American Studies 59. Jg., ISSN 0340-2827 © 2015 Universitätsverlag WINTER GmbH, Heidelberg Amerikastudien / American Studies 59.4 ★ Reviews their reward if they won against the American for future territorial expansion and Indian re - forces. Republicans concluded that Ameri - moval. The overall consequence of Indian de- can victory in the Crescent City thus ensured feats and the assertion of American manhood the safety of Louisianan women. As a result, was the strengthening of white American the War of 1812 could be depicted as a suc - reproductive facilities, territorial expansion, cess, even though the original war aims—free and American nationalism and consequently trade and sailors’ rights—had not even been Americans came to regard the War of 1812 as mentioned in the Treaty of Ghent, because—it a great victory. would appear—“American men had protected By turning away from Anglo-American their women” (216). Moreover, Eustace ar - relations and instead focusing on white gues that the claim that it was only through American perceptions of Native Americans, Jackson’s victory at New Orleans that Ameri - Eustace offers a convincing explanation for can women had been protected from sexual why Americans considered the war a vic - violence by British soldiers reinforced gen - tory despite their failure to attain any war der inequalities and contributed to the con- aims with regards to Great Britain and the tinuous denial of women’s right to politically maritime issues. After all, large-scale Indian participate in the American nation: “Framing resistance against whites’ expansionism was Jackson’s victory at New Orleans as a strike broken once and for all. Whereas diplomatic against sexual assault helped men maintain historians have shown that alleged British the proposition that, even in the absence of support for Indians attacking settlers on the any other economic or political rights, wives frontier played no role in the coming of the owed unquestioned allegiance to their hus - war and that the Madison Administration bands and their nation in return for simple only added the accusation that Great Brit - protection from rape” (218). ain was behind Indian warfare to the list of According to Eustace, the major results of complaints to make the war declaration more the War of 1812 therefore have little to do with justied, Eustace shows that—whatever their the maritime disputes between the United reasons for supporting or opposing the war in States and its former mother country. Most 1812—Americans tended to unite behind ef - importantly, U.S. troops had decisively beaten forts to displace Native Americans once war Indians in the Northwest and Southwest and operations had commenced. By stressing In - thus opened the areas to white settlement, as dian cruelties and threats to white American the British chose to withdraw their demand civilians, Republicans could generate support for an independent Indian buffer state in the for a deeply divisive war. In other words: they peace negotiations, preferring quick peace in tried to make Americans turn their eyes from North America after more than two decades of the East to the West. It remains an open ques - warfare in Europe against rst Revolutionary tion, however, how inuential the discourses and then Napoleonic France, thus effectively Eustace discovered in presidential speeches, betraying their Indian allies: “The decision to newspaper editorials, political cartoons, nov - do nothing at Ghent meant everything to the els, plays, poems, and tavern songs actually Indians who faced certain dispossession from were. Critics of the ‘expansionist thesis’—the that day forward” (227). The second impor - claim that the United States declared war tant result of the War of 1812, Eustace argues, in order to conquer Canada—maintain that was of a domestic nature. As Republicans problems along the frontier concerned mostly portrayed the war as a conict between vir - Westerners and that those residing along the tuous and brave American men and sexually Atlantic seaboard were more concerned with depraved Indians and Britons, it contributed trade. Moreover, Federalists remained vehe - to the continued exclusion of women from full mently opposed to the war until the British citizenship. As American men had protected destroyed the American capital and demand - them from assault, women were encouraged ed territorial concessions in the peace nego- to marry soldiers who had defended their tiations in 1814. It is doubtful whether the Re- country and serve as ‘reward’ for their brav - publican propaganda efforts emphasizing the ery. Moreover, after men had performed their Indian threat had much purchase with them. military service to the country and opened Lambert dissects the traditional Ameri - the western land for settlement, women were can narrative of the War of 1812 by taking a expected to produce progeny for the emerg - “British perspective, focusing on the develop - ing American nation and lay the foundation ment of policy and strategy in London and Amerikastudien / American Studies 59. Jg., ISSN 0340-2827 © 2015 Universitätsverlag WINTER GmbH, Heidelberg Reviews ★ Amerikastudien / American Studies 59.4 the conduct of war at sea” (3).
Recommended publications
  • The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport
    The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport The Last Battle of the Revolution Less than a quarter of a century after the close of the American Revolution, Great Britain and the United States were again in conflict. Britain and her allies were engaged in a long war with Napoleonic France. The shipping-related industries of the neutral United States benefited hugely, conducting trade with both sides. Hundreds of ships, built in yards on America’s Atlantic coast and manned by American sailors, carried goods, including foodstuffs and raw materials, to Europe and the West Indies. Merchants and farmers alike reaped the profits. In Cambridge, men made plans to profit from this brisk trade. “[T]he soaring hopes of expansionist-minded promoters and speculators in Cambridge were based solidly on the assumption that the economic future of Cambridge rested on its potential as a shipping center.” The very name, Cambridgeport, reflected “the expectation that several miles of waterfront could be developed into a port with an intricate system of canals.” In January 1805, Congress designated Cambridge as a “port of delivery” and “canal dredging began [and] prices of dock lots soared." [1] Judge Francis Dana, a lawyer, diplomat, and Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, was one of the primary investors in the development of Cambridgeport. He and his large family lived in a handsome mansion on what is now Dana Hill. Dana lost heavily when Jefferson declared an embargo in 1807. Britain and France objected to America’s commercial relationship with their respective enemies and took steps to curtail trade with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Brookline Historical Society
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BROOKLINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR 1963 -1966 PRICE $1.00 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BROOKLINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR 1963-1966 BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS 02146 PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY 1968 CONTENTS 1963 PAGE OFFICERS . 5 REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 5 REPORT OF THE TREASURER 6 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ROOMS 7 ILLUSTRATION - WIDOW HARRIS HOUSE 8 "How OUR SOCIETY COOPERATES WITH THE TOWN" BY NINA FLETCHER LITTLE 9 "THE COREY HOUSE" BY JAMES A. LOWELL 10 "THE BRANDEGEE ESTATE" BY MRS. JOHN E. BOlT. 14 1964 OFFICERS . 16 SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1964 . 17 REPORT OF THE TREASURER 18 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ROOMS 19 "THE OLD TOWN HALL WHEN IT WAS NEW" BY JAMES A. LOWELL . 20 "THE HOUSE THAT AMOS BUILT" BY REV. GEORGE L. BLACKMAN, PH.D. 24 "ANTIQUE AUTO MUSEUM - LARZ ANDERSON PARK" BY CHARLES BRODERICK 36 "RAILROADS IN BROOKLINE" BY JAMES M. DRISCOLL 38 1965 PAGE OFFICERS . 42 SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1965 42 REPORT OF THE TREASURER 43 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ROOMS 44 "HISTORY OF THE BROOKLINE LIBRARY SYSTEM" BY MRS. THERESA CARROLL 45 CHARLES C. SHATTUCK, M. D., LETTER 46 FALL MEETING - 1%5 47 "A BRIEF HISTORY OF PIERCE HALL, 382 WALNUT STREET" BY N IN A FLETCHER LITTLE 48 1966 OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES 50 REPORT OF THE TREASURER 51 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ROOMS 52 CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OF BROOKLINE CERTIFICATE OF VOTE. 54 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 55 "HISTORY OF THE JOHN WARREN HOMESTEAD" BY NINA FLETCHER LITTLE 56 REPRINT - "FIRE, WRECKERS DOOM HOTEL" (BEACONSFIELD) .
    [Show full text]
  • Medallic History of the War of 1812 John W
    MMCCAA AAddvviiss rryy The Journal of the Medal Collectors of America Volume 15 ∙ Number 5 September ∙ October 2012 Special Edition Editor Medallic History of the War of 1812 John W. Adams [email protected] Consequences to the American Producer : Tony Lopez Indian Nations Photography by Benjamin Weiss Bob Williams Member Contacts Barry Tayman, Treasurer 3115 Nestling Pine Court Ellicott City, MD 21042 [email protected] Benjamin Weiss, Webmaster [email protected] MCA Officers David Menchell, President [email protected] Skyler Liechty, Vice President [email protected] Anne E. Bentley, Secretary [email protected] Annual Membership Dues: $55 w/Hard Copy Edition $25 w/Electronic Edition Check out our MCA Website: www.medalcollectors.org Introduction to the War of 1812 Special Edition his issue is our “War of 1812 Special”. The length of our only article has crowded out a rich menu of correspondence, announcement of the Club Medal for 2013, the President’s Message and ye Editor’s Notes. We have all of these items PLUS an especially rich and varied backlog to which to look forward. We hope to Tpublish another issue soon after this one and yet another before year end. Turning to the War of 1812, our webmaster Ben Weiss has crafted an outstanding analysis of the subject. He covers all of the many venues of the War – the battles on our Northern frontier, on the East Coast, on the Great Lakes, the epic confrontations at sea and the final chapter featuring Andrew Jackson at New Orleans. These are the stuff of history books and will be familiar to all readers familiar with the past and with the traditions of our nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The War of 1812 Was Crucial in the Standards Development of the Still Young United States
    Research Topic- War of 1812 Research Topic War of 1812 Grade Level 4th – 5th Grade Time Required 1 class period (60 minutes) Ohio’s Learning American History – Heritage: The War of 1812 was crucial in the Standards development of the still young United States. It also heavily impacted History Strand the people living in the new state of Ohio. Common Core CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.4.3 Standards Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.5.3 Explain the relationships or interactions between two or more individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text based on specific information in the text. Objective Students will learn what happened during the War of 1812 and its impact on the United States. Students will understand the role Ohio played in the War of 1812. Students will analyze the factors that lead to the war. Research The War of 1812 was fought between the United States, Great Britain, Statement and their respective allies, from June 1812 to February 1815. Neither side ever gained a significant advantage and the war resulted in a return to the status quo. Veterans Service U.S. Military Personnel Before War: ~ 7,000 U.S. Military Personnel by the End of the War: ~ 493,000 - Regulars: ~ 35,000 - Militia: ~ 458,000 U.S. Military Deaths: ~ 15,000 Native American Impact: ~ 15% of the Creek population were killed - It is uncertain how many Native Americans died as a result of the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Phelan on Hickey, 'Don't Give up the Ship!: Myths of the War of 1812'
    H-Maritime Phelan on Hickey, 'Don't Give Up the Ship!: Myths of the War of 1812' Review published on Friday, June 1, 2007 Donald R. Hickey. Don't Give Up the Ship!: Myths of the War of 1812. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006. xxvi + 430 pp. $34.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-252-03179-3. Reviewed by Claire Phelan (Department of History, Texas Christian University)Published on H- Maritime (June, 2007) Mr. Madison's Forgotten War In Don't Give Up the Ship: Myths of the War of 1812, historian Donald R. Hickey ably demonstrates his vast knowledge of a subject largely ignored in the collective public memory. In this highly entertaining work, Hickey recounts the most memorable incidents and personalities of the period and attempts to debunk the prevailing myths that have so long surrounded them. Dividing the book into six sections--(1) "The Causes of the War"; (2) "Battles and Campaigns"; (3) "The Maritime War"; (4) "Soldiers, Sailors, and Civilians"; (5) "The Mechanics of Waging War"; (6) "The End of the War"-- allows the reader, both casual and professional, to follow the progress of the conflict as it unfolded. Such an approach suits Hickey's engaging and succinct writing style and offers the reader an encyclopedic work made all the more appealing by the stoutly held opinions of the author. The prologue neatly details the consequences for the United States of the ongoing conflict in Europe while the epilogue describes how the War of 1812 left the American people with "a buoyant self- confidence, a clearer … identity, and a new-found sense of purpose" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Row Area Form Survey
    FORM A-AREA Assessor's Sheets USGS Quad Area Letter Fonn Numbers in Area 107,108,219 X Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Massachusetts Archives Building Boston, MA 02125 Town: Groton Place: Fanners Row Photographs Name ofArea: Fanners Row X See continuation sheet Current Use: Residential/commemorative/agricultural/educational Construction Dates or Period: c. 1680-1970 Overall Condition: Good-excellent Major Intrusions and Alterations: Approximately 2 modem or rebuilt residences; few modem materials Acreage: Approximately 30 Sketch Map Recorded by: Sanford Johnson X See continuation sheet Organization: Groton Historical Commission Date (MonthlYear): 10/06 ARCIDTECTURAL DESCRIPTION: Describe architectural, structural and landscapefeatures and evaluate in terms ofother areas within the community. See Continuation Sheet X Introduction The Farmers Row Area comprises a linear village located between the house at 108 Pleasant Street and the south boundary of the Groton School Campus, although the Groton School will be addressed on a separate Area Fonn in the future. The east and west sides are the rear ofthe lots along Farmers Row. The area, which is 36 miles west of Boston, consists largely of Federal Period residences with other styles represented including the Greek Revival, Victorian Eclectic, Classical Revival and Colonial. Wood frame and some brick construction, usually oftwo and one half stories with side gabled roofs, is typical although larger buildings of brick do exist. A great deal ofthe area's character is derived from the well-preserved farmhouses, many with outbuildings, arranged along the road which is elevated above the Nashua River to the west. The core ofthe Groton School, begun in 1884, is a group of architect-designed brick and stone buildings focused inward toward a central circular lawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomball College Library
    Tomball College Library 30555 Tomball Parkway http://tclibrary.nhmccd.edu 832-559-4211 Early American History This guide will help you locate resources on early American history. The American Presidents during the early war years are also listed here. Listed below here are the early American wars: The American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), also known as the American War of Independence, was a war fought primarily between Great Britain and revolutionaries within thirteen of her North American colonies. The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain. This war was fought from 1812 to 1815. The Mexican-American War was fought between the United States and Mexico between 1846 and 1848. The American Civil War was fought between the northern and the southern states of the United States of America between the time period of 1861 and 1865. Books The Library Catalog includes books (and audio-visual materials) for all colleges in the district and all branches of the Harris County Public Library system and Montgomery County Public Library System. If you can't find particular material at this Library, you can request it from the other libraries by using your current library card. If you cannot locate what you need, please contact a Reference Librarian. Useful Keywords: Type one of these keywords listed under different categories in the "Subject Keyword" field in the Catalog General Keywords Notable American women, James Lawrence Military - Biography Generals, Politicians and Isaac Hull Generals - Biography Reformers Philip Kearny Military - History Frederick Douglass Presidents -- United Betsy Ross Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain States – History Dorothea Lynde Dix William Sherman Clara Barton Jefferson Davis George Washington Mary Bickerdyke Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Lake Erie (September 10, 1813)
    The Battle of Lake Erie (September 10, 1813) “We have met the enemy and they are illiam Henry Powell, an Ohio artist who had ours—two ships, two brigs, one schooner studied with Henry Inman in New York City, and a sloop.” With this simple victory mes- sage to General William Henry Harrison, received a coveted commission in 1847: the last commander of the U.S. forces in the North- of the historical paintings for the U.S. Capitol west Territory, Commodore Oliver Hazard Rotunda. His subject, Discovery of the Mississippi Perry announced his defeat of the British by De Soto A.D. 1541, was completed in 1853. As Henry Tuckerman fleet at the Battle of Lake Erie. This battle, W one of the most unusual in American naval wrote in his 1867 Book of the Artists, it was “a commission bestowed history, ensured American control of the upon him rather in deference to his Western origin than because of Great Lakes during the War of 1812 and 1 secured the country’s tenuous hold on priority of claim in point of rank or age.” That is, the new political the Northwest. clout of the Northwest Territory had made itself felt. This national suc- Commodore Perry’s victory was quickly cess led his home state to commission Powell in 1857 to paint Perry’s enshrined as one of the heroic military events of the early American Republic. The Victory on Lake Erie for the rotunda of the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus. famous engagement on September 10, The work was completed in his New York City studio.
    [Show full text]
  • The President-Little Belt Affair and the Coming of the War of 1812
    A FRIENDLY SALUTE: THE PRESIDENT-LITTLE BELT AFFAIR AND THE COMING OF THE WAR OF 1812 by JONATHON WOODARD HOOKS A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Jonathon Woodard Hooks 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT In May 1811, thirteen months before the start of the War of 1812, the United States frigate President and the British sloop-of-war Little Belt fought an hour-long battle approximately fifty miles off the North Carolina coast. When the firing ceased the Little Belt had suffered heavy damage and thirty-two casualties. The President sustained only minor damage and one wounded sailor. The brief battle had significant ramifications for Anglo- American relations. The victory of the U.S.S. President four years after the defeat of the Chesapeake redeemed the honor of the United States and its navy. Because the action occurred near the spot of the previous bout, some Americans and Britons suspected the scrape did not happen accidentally. Newspaper editors and political leaders hostile to the president alleged that President Madison ordered the attack as a means to halt the impressments of American sailors or possibly to draw the United States into a war with Great Britain. In both nations sentiment for a conflict increased as many Britons believed the United States had sullied their national honor and numerous Americans concluded that a victory over Britain would come with ease. The President -Little Belt Affair also confirmed the American tactical theory holding that the United States Navy could never destroy Britain’s, but that lone, swift ships could defeat single British vessels in head-to-head duels.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Battle of Lake Erie, September 10, 1813
    From the pointing "Bottle ol Lotto Erie" bv Thotnes Birch (1779-18511. Courtesy of Pennsylvonio Acedemy ol the Fine Arts. In the Battle of Lake Erie, September 10, The Memorial Government. The memorial became 1813, Oliver Hazard Perry won a deci­ The memorial is constructed of pink Perry's Victory and International Peace sive victory over a British naval squadron Milford, Mass., granite. In large mass this Memorial National Monument on commanded by Capt. Robert H. Barclay. stone gives the appearance of purest white. July 6, 1936, and on October 26, 1972, That action (see the other side of this folder The shaft, built of 78 courses of granite, it was redesignated Perry's Victory and for the story) had far-reaching effects on the is a Greek Doric fluted column 352 feet International Peace Memorial. The grounds War of 1812 and the future of the high and 45 feet in diameter at its base. cover more than 25 acres on South United States, for it gave the Americans Its cap, reached by elevator, serves as an ob­ Bass Island in Lake Erie. control of Lake Erie and made possible a servation platform. Above this is a bronze successful advance into Canada by an urn, 23 feet high, 18 feet wide, and About Your Visit American army under the command of weighing 11 tons. When floodlit at night, South Bass Island is about 4 miles from the Gen. William Henry Harrison. the column presents a surpassingly brilliant mainland. From April through November, spectacle to both yachtsman and landsman. automobile ferries operate from Catawba The combined land and naval successes One of the world's greatest battle monu­ Point (4 miles) and Port Clinton (14 enabled the United States to hold the Old ments, the memorial is the most massive miles).
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled [Claire Phelan on Don't Give up the Ship!: Myths Of
    Donald R. Hickey. Don't Give Up the Ship!: Myths of the War of 1812. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006. xxvi + 430 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-252-03179-3. Reviewed by Claire Phelan Published on H-Maritime (June, 2007) Mr. Madison's Forgotten War buoyant self-confidence, a clearer … identity, and In Don't Give Up the Ship: Myths of the War of a new-found sense of purpose" (p. 310). 1812, historian Donald R. Hickey ably demon‐ The frst section of the book describes a grow‐ strates his vast knowledge of a subject largely ig‐ ing national resentment against the British. Fu‐ nored in the collective public memory. In this elled by the Orders-in-Council, the Chesapeake Af‐ highly entertaining work, Hickey recounts the fair, and American suspicions that Indian hostility most memorable incidents and personalities of was a consequence of British incitement, the stage the period and attempts to debunk the prevailing was set for latent hostilities to grow more open. myths that have so long surrounded them. Divid‐ Section 2 follows the most notable battles and ing the book into six sections--(1) "The Causes of campaigns of the war, but does not get dragged the War"; (2) "Battles and Campaigns"; (3) "The into a solely military portrait; the inclusion of Maritime War"; (4) "Soldiers, Sailors, and Civil‐ anecdotes, such as the circumstances surrounding ians"; (5) "The Mechanics of Waging War"; (6) "The the British who dined at the White House and the End of the War"--allows the reader, both casual creation of the Star-Spangled Banner, infuse mili‐ and professional, to follow the progress of the tary history with some human interest.
    [Show full text]
  • British and American Naval Prisoners of War During the War of 1812 Matthew Brenckle, 2005
    British and American Naval Prisoners of War During the War of 1812 Matthew Brenckle, 2005 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org British and American Naval Prisoners of War During the War of 1812 Matthew Brenckle, 2005 CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................1 Surrendering a Warship during the War of 1812 ..............................2 Boarding the Captured Warship: A Bloody Encounter .........................4 Captured Baggage and Stores ...............................................5 The Fate of the Prisoners ...................................................7 The Emotional Impact on the Captured Crew ...............................10 Preferential Treatment for Captured Officers ................................12 Incarceration of Enlisted British ...........................................13 American Prisoners in England ............................................14 England’s Infamous Dartmoor Prison ......................................16 Wounded Prisoners: Accusations of Mistreatment ...........................19 Sailors Switching Sides ...................................................22 Prisoner Exchange: Rank for Rank .........................................26 Prisoners Returning Home ................................................29 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org Introduction Assheton Humphreys was a perceptive man and a good judge of character. Appoint- ed
    [Show full text]