DOCSLIB.ORG

International Military Tribunal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Military Tribunal INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL November 24, 1947 President: Salomé Beyer Vice-President: Tomás Ortiz 2 Index 1. Cover page 2. Letters from the Chair 2.1. President 2.2. Vice -President 3. Purpose of the Committee 3.1. What is the International Military Tribunal? 3.2. Why is the International Military Tribunal important? 4. Law 5. History 5.1. World War II 5.2. The Holocaust 5.3. The Auschwitz Trials 6. Defendants 6.1. Maria Mandl 6.2. Arthur Liebehenschel 6.3. Johann Paul Kremer 7. QARMAS 8. Useful Sources 9. Bibliography COSMUN 2019 3 2. Letters from the Chair 2.1. President “Those who do not remember the past, are condemned to repeat it.” -George Santayana Dearest delegates, It is an absolute honor and privilege to be the president of the International Military Tribunal for COSMUN 2019. I personally want to thank you for choosing to be part of this committee, and COSMUN as a whole, and guarantee that both myself and Tomás will do our absolute best to make this experience an engaging and impactful one. I have been involved with Model United Nations since sixth grade and I completely love it. The magic that I have found within the walls of committees like the Security Council, the Human Rights Council, the International Court of Justice and the Joint Crisis Committee is unlike anything else I have ever experienced, and the friendships that I have developed because of these activities are priceless and timeless. I also want to tell you that all my experience is entirely at your disposal if you are to have any doubts, comments or concerns. All of my experience leads me to believe that the IMT at this year’s COSMUN is perhaps the most challenging, exciting and innovative committee I have ever been a part of. As a committee that has rarely, if ever, been done before in any of the Medellín Model United Nations, COSMUN proudly introduces a criminal and historical court, which goes along with COSMUN’s mission to create a better future for ourselves, and the future generations. After all, to change the present you must understand the past. We expect deep historical and political understanding from our delegates and are looking forward to seeing their individual and collective performance. Also, we expect that both the procedure and the historical guides be completely read by all of our delegates. Please take into account that you must turn in a document with your responses to the Questions to the Delegate prior to the Model. Please contact us if you have any doubts, comments or concerns at [email protected]. ​ I look forward to meeting you, and wish you the best of luck, Salomé Beyer President of the International Military Tribunal COSMUN 2019 4 2.2. Vice-President Distinguished delegates, Welcome to the International Military Tribunal at COSMUN 2019. As Vice-President, it is a great privilege to form part of this committee. The Model of United Nations is more than a school activity. Beyond the leadership that it promotes, it is all about the essence of being able to transport yourself, and interpret a situation second handedly, by understanding first how humanity has treated past, current, and future matters. It is about the personal growth, academic learning, social connections, and exposure to the world that make such an event worth all the hard work. I can guarantee that the next three days we will be overseeing a transformation in every one of you, because a committee as challenging as the International Military Tribunal requires true academics, and leaders in formation. I have been deeply involved with Models of United Nations for years, and I can testify that when I am there, there is nowhere I would rather be. I remember being skeptical about the simulations that took place, until I was faced with how real history is, and how we are changed when we learn from it. With this same passion I am really looking forward to co-lead a committee of past and future merged in one. The hard work that both the president and I have put into this committee is at your entire disposal, and it is with all the passion, experience, research, and commitment that we have worked together with the purpose of creating an innovative committee that has not been presented before. It is precisely with this component of originality that we expect deep analysis of history, politics and society from each and every one of the delegates, because such a fusion requires a profound understanding. COSMUN intends to simulate a reality, and it is this very reality that we will be living, because the future is ours to shape, based on what has occurred. If there is anything you might need, either a question or a request, do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected]. ​ ​ I look forward to meeting you, and await with eagerness and high expectations, Tomás Ortiz Vice-President of the International Military Tribunal COSMUN 2019 5 3. Purpose of the Committee 3.1. What is the International Military Tribunal? The International Military Tribunal was the entity through which the Allied Powers of World War II judged Nazi war criminals for their atrocious war crimes. The Tribunal was formally opened in Nuremberg, Germany on the November 20, 1945 and by October of that same year, the chief prosecutors had already presented the charges against the 24 Nazis who were to be judged. The four charges which were presented against them were: 1. Conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity, 2. Crimes against peace, 3. War Crimes, 4. Crimes against humanity. The defendants represented the diplomatic, economic, political and military areas of leadership within the Nazi party. But the most prominent leaders of Nazi Germany, them being Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, did not stand trial because they committed suicide before the end of the war. Even though they could, the IMT decided to not try them posthumously because they did not want to create speculation or any kind of doubt on people’s minds on whether or not these infamous leaders were dead. Even though the IMT wanted to put 24 individuals on trial at Nuremberg, they only managed to include 22. Of these 22, the Allied forces had convincing evidence which tied them to crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity: 1. Martin Bormann, 2. Karl Doenitz, 3. Hans Frank, 4. Wilhelm Frick, 5. Hans Fritzsche, 6. Walter Funk, 7. Hermann Goering, 8. Rudolph Hess, 9. Alfred Jodl, 10. Ernst Kaltenbrunner, 11. Wilhelm Keitel, 12. Erich Raeder, 13. Alfred Rosenberg COSMUN 2019 6 14. Fritz Sauckel, 15. Hjalmar Schacht, 16. Arthur Seyss-Inquart, 17. Albert Speer, 18. Julius Streicher, 19. Constantin von Neurath, 20. Franz von Papen, 21. Joachim von Ribbentrop, 22. Baldur von Schirach. These 22, the “original 22”, had committed crimes that ranged from forced slave labor to the creation of concentration camps and being the masterminds behind the infamous Kristallnacht1. The Allied Forces tried their hardest to legally punish each and every single member of the Nazi party, but many of them argued that they were only following orders, which tainted the cases by affecting the ruling. This made the specific piece of evidence a mitigating circumstance2 . Many Nazis who claimed such things received very light sentences and went back to their normal lives in a matter of months. Other former Nazis escaped to other countries to avoid persecution. Many of them lived their lives without any sort of punishment for what they had done. One must consider that even though the Nuremberg Trials were the most famous and the most publicized trials out of the ones the IMT directed, many more trials happened under their ruling. Some other tribunals were the Tokyo War Crimes Trial, the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings3, the individual trials carried out by the Soviet Union, the United States of America, the French Republic and the United Kingdom, and finally, the Auschwitz trials. 3.2. Why is the International Military Tribunal important? The International Military Tribunal is a historical accomplishment and this can be proven just by looking at the name of their most famous trials; Nuremberg. Many historians consider the decision of having the trials take place in Nuremberg as a final act of defiance against the Nazis, 1 The organized destruction of synagogues, Jewish houses and shops, along with the arrest of individual Jews. It ​ took place on the night between the 9th and the 10th of November of 1938. 2 Mitigating circumstance: an accessory condition, event or fact which may be considered by the court to reduce the ​ culpability of a criminal. 3 12 trials on high ranking German officials directed by the United States of America. ​ COSMUN 2019 7 considering the previous existence of the Nuremberg Laws4. But its defiance towards immoral and atrocious organizations and coalitions is not the only aspect which makes the IMT so special. The testimonies brought out in the trials revealed much of what we know about the Holocaust today, and guided many of the articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The IMT also served as a base for the current international criminal law because it introduced and established the mentality of “justice, not revenge”. This means that the winners of the war prosecuted criminals because of factual information and because of things that were proven to have occurred, rather than simply to look for revenge, as it happened after WWI. In addition, the Charter for the International Military Tribunal served as base for the Nuremberg Principles established by the International Law Commission5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Déportés À Auschwitz. Certains Résis- Tion D’Une Centaine, Sont Traqués Et Tent Avec Des Armes
    MORT1943 ET RÉSISTANCE BIEN QU’AYANT rarement connu les noms de leurs victimes juives, les nazis entendaient que ni Zivia Lubetkin, ni Richard Glazar, ni Thomas Blatt ne survivent à la « solution finale ». Ils survécurent cependant et, après la Shoah, chacun écrivit un livre sur la Résistance en 1943. Quelque 400 000 Juifs vivaient dans le ghetto de Varsovie surpeuplé, mais les épi- démies, la famine et les déportations à Treblinka – 300 000 personnes entre juillet et septembre 1942 – réduisirent considérablement ce nombre. Estimant que 40 000 Juifs s’y trouvaient encore (le chiffre réel approchait les 55 000), Heinrich Himmler, le chef des SS, ordonna la déportation de 8 000 autres lors de sa visite du ghetto, le 9 janvier 1943. Cependant, sous la direction de Mordekhaï Anielewicz, âgé de 23 ans, le Zydowska Organizacja Bojowa (ZOB, Organisation juive de combat) lança une résistance armée lorsque les Allemands exécutèrent l’ordre d’Himmler, le 18 janvier. Bien que plus de 5 000 Juifs aient été déportés le 22 janvier, la Résistance juive – elle impliquait aussi bien la recherche de caches et le refus de s’enregistrer que la lutte violente – empêcha de remplir le quota et conduisit les Allemands à mettre fin à l’Aktion. Le répit, cependant, fut de courte durée. En janvier, Zivia Lubetkin participa à la création de l’Organisation juive de com- bat et au soulèvement du ghetto de Varsovie. « Nous combattions avec des gre- nades, des fusils, des barres de fer et des ampoules remplies d’acide sulfurique », rapporte-t-elle dans son livre Aux jours de la destruction et de la révolte.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Rudolf Höss
    TIMELINE RUDOLF HÖSS (25 Nov 1900 - 16 Apr 1947) Compiled and edited by Campbell M Gold (2010) --()-- Note: Rudolf Höss must not be confused with Rudolf Hess, Hitler's deputy, and one of the first group of Nuremburg defendants. --()-- 25 Nov 1900 - Rudolf Höss born in Baden-Baden, Germany. When he was six or seven years old, the Höss family moved to Mannheim, where Höss was educated. --()-- 1922 - Höss Joins the Nazi Party. --()-- 1934 - Höss joins the SS. --()-- 01 May 1940 - Höss is the first Commandant of Auschwitz where it is estimated that more than a million people were murdered. Jun 1941 - According to Höss' later trial testimony, he was summoned to Berlin for a meeting with Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler "to receive personal orders." Himmler told Höss that Hitler had given the order for the physical extermination of Europe's Jews. Himmler had selected Auschwitz for this purpose, he said, "on account of its easy access by rail and also because the extensive site offered space for measures ensuring isolation." Himmler told Höss that he would be receiving all operational orders from Adolf Eichmann. Himmler described the project as a "secret Reich matter", meaning that "no one was allowed to speak about these matters with any person and that everyone promised upon his life to keep the utmost secrecy." 1941 - After visiting Treblinka extermination camp to study its methods of human extermination, Höss tested and perfected the techniques of mass killing that made Auschwitz the most efficiently murderous instrument of the Final Solution. Later, Höss explained how 10,000 people were exterminated in one 24-hour period: "Technically [it] wasn't so hard – it would not have been hard to exterminate even greater numbers..
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate History – Alternate Memory: Counterfactual Literature in the Context of German Normalization
    ALTERNATE HISTORY – ALTERNATE MEMORY: COUNTERFACTUAL LITERATURE IN THE CONTEXT OF GERMAN NORMALIZATION by GUIDO SCHENKEL M.A., Freie Universität Berlin, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (German Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2012 © Guido Schenkel, 2012 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines a variety of Alternate Histories of the Third Reich from the perspective of memory theory. The term ‘Alternate History’ describes a genre of literature that presents fictional accounts of historical developments which deviate from the known course of hi story. These allohistorical narratives are inherently presentist, meaning that their central question of “What If?” can harness the repertoire of collective memory in order to act as both a reflection of and a commentary on contemporary social and political conditions. Moreover, Alternate Histories can act as a form of counter-memory insofar as the counterfactual mode can be used to highlight marginalized historical events. This study investigates a specific manifestation of this process. Contrasted with American and British examples, the primary focus is the analysis of the discursive functions of German-language counterfactual literature in the context of German normalization. The category of normalization connects a variety of commemorative trends in postwar Germany aimed at overcoming the legacy of National Socialism and re-formulating a positive German national identity. The central hypothesis is that Alternate Histories can perform a unique task in this particular discursive setting. In the context of German normalization, counterfactual stories of the history of the Third Reich are capable of functioning as alternate memories, meaning that they effectively replace the memory of real events with fantasies that are better suited to serve as exculpatory narratives for the German collective.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Sample Docum Ents
    APPENDIX 1: SAMPLE DOCUMENTS Figure 1.1. Arrest warrant (Haftbefehl) for Georg von Sauberzweig, signed by Morgen. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde 129 130 Appendix 1 Figure 1.2. Judgment against Sauberzweig. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde Appendix 1 131 Figure 1.3. Hitler’s rejection of Sauberzweig’s appeal. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde 132 Appendix 1 Figure 1.4. Confi rmation of Sauberzweig’s execution. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin- Lichterfelde Appendix 1 133 Figure 1.5. Letter from Morgen to Maria Wachter. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut APPENDIX 2: PHOTOS Figure 2.1. Konrad Morgen 1938. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut 134 Appendix 2 135 Figure 2.2. Konrad Morgen in his SS uniform. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut 136 Appendix 2 Figure 2.3. Karl Otto Koch. Courtesy of the US National Archives Appendix 2 137 Figure 2.4. Karl and Ilse Koch with their son, at Buchwald. Corbis Images Figure 2.5. Odilo Globocnik 138 Appendix 2 Figure 2.6. Hermann Fegelein. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Figure 2.7. Ilse Koch. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Appendix 2 139 Figure 2.8. Waldemar Hoven. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Figure 2.9. Christian Wirth. Courtesy of Yad Vashem 140 Appendix 2 Figure 2.10. Jaroslawa Mirowska. Private collection NOTES Preface 1. The execution of Karl Otto Koch, former commandant of Buchenwald, is well documented. The execution of Hermann Florstedt, former commandant of Majdanek, is disputed by a member of his family (Lindner (1997)).
    [Show full text]
  • The 2015 Auschwitz-Trial of Lüneburg
    Human Rights III, Spring 2016 Astrid Juckenack (930613-T005) The 2015 Auschwitz-trial of Lüneburg: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Collective Memory of the Holocaust in Nazi-trials in Modern-day Germany. Author: Astrid Juckenack Malmö Högskola Human Rights III; MR106L Spring 2016 Supervisor: Malin Isaksson 1 Human Rights III, Spring 2016 Astrid Juckenack (930613-T005) Abstract The points of departure in this thesis are the reciprocal relationship between the memories of human rights violations, the application of the relevant law and the understanding of what is criminal, as well as the recent trend in German courts to belatedly try low-profile Nazi- criminals. To explore these phenomena further, a critical discourse analysis incorporating historical elements is conducted on the 2015 trial of “the bookkeeper of Auschwitz” Oskar Gröning and the related media-reports. By identifying and investigating the expression of collective memory therein, a shift is revealed in that low-level participation in the Holocaust is no longer remembered as a moral infringement exclusively, but accepted as a criminal act for which a perpetrator ought to be held liable. Alongside Holocaust-focused collective memory, there are further tendencies toward a distinct memory of the prolonged failure of the German judiciary. It was thus found that long-term societal change can prevail against a deeply ingrained culture of impunity. Keywords: human rights, collective memory, Holocaust, Germany, Auschwitz, Auschwitz trial, Oskar Gröning, SS, accessory to murder, impunity Wordcount: 16,497 words 2 Human Rights III, Spring 2016 Astrid Juckenack (930613-T005) Table of Contents Abstract 2 Abbreviations 6 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Introduction to the Problem Area 7 1.2 Research Problem, -Questions and –Aim 8 1.3 Relevance for the Field of Human Rights 9 1.4 Delimitations 9 1.5 Ethical Considerations 10 1.6 Disposition 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Im Frauenlager Von Auschwitz-Birkenau Stellte Die Lagerleiterin Maria Mandl Im Oktober 1942 Auf Inoffiziellem Wege Ein „Mädch
    1 DAS ORCHESTER VON BLOCK 12 EINLEITUNG Im Frauenlager von Auschwitz-Birkenau stellte die Lagerleiterin Maria Mandl im Oktober 1942 auf inoffiziellem Wege ein „Mädchenorchester“ zusammen, das zwischen 1943 und 1944 unter der Leitung der Geigerin Alma Rosé stand. Die Musikerinnen lebten und probten in einer separaten Baracke, dem Block 12 (später im Block 7). Mitglieder der Lagerkapelle von Kaunas (Kauen). Das 1942 gegründete Orchester bestand aus 35 Musikern und fünf Sängern und gab im Ghetto etwa 80 Konzerte. Diese fanden in der dortigen Polizeistation statt. Im selben Gebäude hatte vor der deutschen Besatzung eine Jeschiwa ihren Platz. Die funktionale Rolle der Nazi-Lager beim Völkermord an den Juden, wie auch an den Sinti und Roma, gibt dem Phänomen der Musik an diesen Orten eine besondere Bedeutung. Dadurch, dass sie – teilweise – die organisierte Vernichtung ganzer Völker „untermalte“, kommt ihr in diesem Kontext eine Symbolik zu, die noch bestärkt wird durch die Bedeutung, die die Nazis ihr zu Propagandazwecken im Ghettolager Theresienstadt zumaßen. Die verschiedene Musik, die Alma Rosé (1906-1944): Erfolgreiche Geigerin (1); an der Spitze ihres sowohl in den Vernichtungs- wie auch in den übrigen Orchesters, der „Wiener Walzermädeln“ in den 30er Jahren (2); als Dirigentin des Mädchenorchesters von Auschwitz-Birkenau. Die Kapelle begleitet die Rückkehr Konzentrationslagern erklang, war aber nicht ausschließlich eines Arbeitskommandos. Zeichnung von Mieczyslaw Koscielniak (3). mit dem Genozid an den europäischen Juden verbunden. Diese Ausstellung erklärt, welche Rolle die Musik in den deutschen Dass es in den Nazi-Lagern Musik gegeben hat und diese sogar KZs spielte und in welchen Formen sie auftrat. einen besonderen Stellen-wert hatte, ist heute weitgehend bekannt, wurde jedoch erst in den 1980er-Jahren von Musikalische Aktivitäten gab es im Übrigen nicht nur Expertenseite bestätigt – so schien die Kunst doch völlig in den nationalsozialistischen Lagern, sondern in den unvereinbar mit dem Kontext, in dem sie entstand.
    [Show full text]
  • Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society
    Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society Series Editor: Stephen McVeigh, Associate Professor, Swansea University, UK Editorial Board: Paul Preston LSE, UK Joanna Bourke Birkbeck, University of London, UK Debra Kelly University of Westminster, UK Patricia Rae Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada James J. Weingartner Southern Illimois University, USA (Emeritus) Kurt Piehler Florida State University, USA Ian Scott University of Manchester, UK War, Culture and Society is a multi- and interdisciplinary series which encourages the parallel and complementary military, historical and sociocultural investigation of 20th- and 21st-century war and conflict. Published: The British Imperial Army in the Middle East, James Kitchen (2014) The Testimonies of Indian Soldiers and the Two World Wars, Gajendra Singh (2014) South Africa’s “Border War,” Gary Baines (2014) Forthcoming: Cultural Responses to Occupation in Japan, Adam Broinowski (2015) 9/11 and the American Western, Stephen McVeigh (2015) Jewish Volunteers, the International Brigades and the Spanish Civil War, Gerben Zaagsma (2015) Military Law, the State, and Citizenship in the Modern Age, Gerard Oram (2015) The Japanese Comfort Women and Sexual Slavery During the China and Pacific Wars, Caroline Norma (2015) The Lost Cause of the Confederacy and American Civil War Memory, David J. Anderson (2015) Filming the End of the Holocaust Allied Documentaries, Nuremberg and the Liberation of the Concentration Camps John J. Michalczyk Bloomsbury Academic An Imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc LONDON • OXFORD • NEW YORK • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2014 Paperback edition fi rst published 2016 © John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Literature
    english edition 2 2017 Gender and Literature issue editor ANNA NASIŁOWSKA SŁAWOMIR BURYŁA Manly Fascism AGNIESZKA DAUKSZA KwieKulik as an Unknown: A Neo-Avant-gardist Laboratory of Experience ARÁNZAZU CALDERÓN PUERTA The Theme of Rape in Ida Fink’s Aryan Papers and Tadeusz Słobodzianek’s Our Class KRYSTYNA KŁOSIŃSKA The Secret of the Dulskis’ Establishment WOJCIECH ŚMIEJA A Piece of Fedora Cake: The Male-Centric Imagination of Jerzy Andrzejewski and the Scholarly Reconnaissance MONIKA ŚWIERKOSZ Arachne and Athena: Towards a Different Poetics of Women’s Writing teksty drugie · Institute of Literary Research Polish Academy of Science index 337412 · pl issn 0867-0633 EDITORIAL BOARD Agata Bielik-Robson (uk), Włodzimierz Bolecki, Maria Delaperrière (France), Ewa Domańska, Grzegorz Grochowski, Zdzisław Łapiński, Michał Paweł Markowski (usa), Maciej Maryl, Jakub Momro, Anna Nasiłowska (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Leonard Neuger (Sweden), Ryszard Nycz (Editor-in-Chief), Bożena Shallcross (usa), Marta Zielińska, Tul’si Bhambry (English Translator and Language Consultant), Justyna Tabaszewska, Marta Bukowiecka (Managing Editor) ADVISORY BOARD Edward Balcerzan, Stanisław Barańczak (usa) , Małgorzata Czermińska, Paweł Dybel, Knut Andreas Grimstad (Norway), Jerzy Jarzębski, Bożena Karwowska (Canada), Krzysztof Kłosiński, Dorota Krawczyńska, Vladimir Krysinski (Canada), Luigi Marinelli (Italy), Arent van Nieukerken (the Netherlands), Ewa Rewers, German Ritz (Switzerland), Henryk Siewierski (Brasil), Janusz Sławiński , Ewa Thompson (usa), Joanna Tokarska-Bakir,
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Strafverfahren
    HESSISCHES LANDESARCHIV – HESSISCHES HAUPTSTAATSARCHIV ________________________________________________________ Bestand 461: Staatsanwaltschaft bei dem Landgericht Frankfurt am Main Strafverfahren ./. Robert Mulka u.a. (1. Auschwitz-Prozess) Az. 4 Ks 2/63 HHStAW Abt. 461, Nr. 37638/1-456 bearbeitet von Susanne Straßburg Allgemeine Verfahrensangaben Delikt(e) Mord (NSG) Beihilfe zum Mord (NSG) Laufzeit 1958-1997 Justiz-Aktenzeichen 4 Ks 2/63 Sonstige Behördensignaturen 4 Js 444/59 ./. Beyer u.a. (Vorermittlungen) Verfahrensart Strafverfahren Verfahrensangaben Bd. 1-133: Hauptakten (in Bd. 95-127 Hauptverhandlungsprotokolle; in Bd. 128-133 Urteil) Bd. 134: Urteil, gebundene Ausgabe Bd. 135-153: Vollstreckungshefte Bd. 154: Sonderheft Strafvollstreckung Bd. 155-156: Bewährungshefte Bd. 157-165: Gnadenhefte Bd. 166-170: Haftsonderhefte Bd. 171-189: Pflichtverteidigergebühren Bd. 190-220: Kostenhefte Bd. 221-224: Sonderhefte Bd. 225-233: Entschädigungshefte Bd. 234-236: Ladungshefte Bd. 237: Anlage zum Protokoll vom 3.5.1965 Bd. 238-242: Gutachten Bd. 243-267: Handakten Bd. 268: Fahndungsheft Baer Bd. 269: Auslobung Baer Bd. 270: Sonderheft Anzeigen Bd. 271-272: Sonderhefte Nebenkläger Bd. 273-274: Ermittlungsakten betr. Robert Mulka, 4 Js 117/64 Bd. 275-276: Zuschriften Bd. 277-279: Berichtshefte Bd. 280-281: Beiakte betr. Josef Klehr, Gns 3/80, Handakten 1-2 Bd. 282: Sonderheft Höcker Bd. 283: Zustellungsurkunden Bd. 284: Übersetzung der polnischen Anklage vom 28.10.1947 Bd. 285: Fernschreiben Bd. 286; Handakte Auschwitz der OStA I Bd. 287-292: Pressehefte Bd. 293-358: Akten der Zentralen Stelle der Landesjustizverwaltungen Ludwigsburg Bd. 359-360: Anlageband 12 Bd. 361: Protokolle ./. Dr. Lucas Bd. 362: Kostenheft i.S. Dr. Schatz Bd. 363: Akte der Zentralen Stelle des Landesjustizverwaltungen Ludwigsburg Bd.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2004 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, April 2004 Copyright © 2004 by Peter Hayes, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Michael Thad Allen, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Paul Jaskot, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Wolf Gruner, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Randolph L. Braham, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Christopher R. Browning, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by William Rosenzweig, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Andrej Angrick, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Sarah B. Farmer, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Rolf Keller, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • The Survivor's Hunt for Nazi Fugitives in Brazil: The
    THE SURVIVOR’S HUNT FOR NAZI FUGITIVES IN BRAZIL: THE CASES OF FRANZ STANGL AND GUSTAV WAGNER IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE by Kyle Leland McLain A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Charlotte 2016 Approved by: ______________________________ Dr. Heather Perry ______________________________ Dr. Jürgen Buchenau ______________________________ Dr. John Cox ii ©2016 Kyle Leland McLain ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT KYLE LELAND MCLAIN. The survivor’s hunt for Nazi fugitives in Brazil: the cases of Franz Stangl and Gustav Wagner in the context of international justice (Under the direction of DR. HEATHER PERRY) On April 23, 1978, Brazilian authorities arrested Gustav Wagner, a former Nazi internationally wanted for his crimes committed during the Holocaust. Despite a confirming witness and petitions from West Germany, Israel, Poland and Austria, the Brazilian Supreme Court blocked Wagner’s extradition and released him in 1979. Earlier in 1967, Brazil extradited Wagner’s former commanding officer, Franz Stangl, who stood trial in West Germany, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. These two particular cases present a paradox in the international hunt to bring Nazi war criminals to justice. They both had almost identical experiences during the war and their escape, yet opposite outcomes once arrested. Trials against war criminals, particularly in West Germany, yielded some successes, but many resulted in acquittals or light sentences. Some Jewish survivors sought extrajudicial means to see that Holocaust perpetrators received their due justice. Some resorted to violence, such as vigilante justice carried out by “Jewish vengeance squads.” In other cases, private survivor and Jewish organizations collaborated to acquire information, lobby diplomatic representatives and draw public attention to the fact that many Nazi war criminals were still at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Destruction and Human Remains
    Destruction and human remains HUMAN REMAINS AND VIOLENCE Destruction and human remains Destruction and Destruction and human remains investigates a crucial question frequently neglected in academic debate in the fields of mass violence and human remains genocide studies: what is done to the bodies of the victims after they are killed? In the context of mass violence, death does not constitute Disposal and concealment in the end of the executors’ work. Their victims’ remains are often treated genocide and mass violence and manipulated in very specific ways, amounting in some cases to true social engineering with often remarkable ingenuity. To address these seldom-documented phenomena, this volume includes chapters based Edited by ÉLISABETH ANSTETT on extensive primary and archival research to explore why, how and by whom these acts have been committed through recent history. and JEAN-MARC DREYFUS The book opens this line of enquiry by investigating the ideological, technical and practical motivations for the varying practices pursued by the perpetrator, examining a diverse range of historical events from throughout the twentieth century and across the globe. These nine original chapters explore this demolition of the body through the use of often systemic, bureaucratic and industrial processes, whether by disposal, concealment, exhibition or complete bodily annihilation, to display the intentions and socio-political frameworks of governments, perpetrators and bystanders. A NST Never before has a single publication brought together the extensive amount of work devoted to the human body on the one hand and to E mass violence on the other, and until now the question of the body in TTand the context of mass violence has remained a largely unexplored area.
    [Show full text]