DOCSLIB.ORG

Cop17 Doc. 81.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cop17 Doc. 81.1 Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 81.1 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September - 5October 2016 Species specific matters Maintenance of the Appendices STANDARD NOMENCLATURE: REPORT OF THE ANIMALS AND PLANTS COMMITTEES 1. This document has been prepared by the Animals and Plants Committees in collaboration with the CITES Secretariat.* Introduction 2. At its 14th meeting (CoP14, The Hague 2007), the Conference of the Parties appointed Ms Ute Grimm of the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, Germany, as the nomenclature specialist of the Animals Committee and Mr Noel McGough, then of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as the nomenclature specialist of the Plants Committee. 3. Following the 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16), nomenclature issues were considered at the 27th and 28th meetings of the Animals Committee (AC27, Veracruz, April 2014; AC28, Tel Aviv, September 2015) and the 21st and 22nd meetings of the Plant Committee (PC21, Veracruz, May 2014; PC22, Tbilisi, October 2015). Nomenclature Working Groups were formed and met at AC27, AC28, PC21 and PC22. The documents from these meetings, together with the working group reports, are available on the CITES Website. 4. In addition to a short section on the revision and publication of the CITES Appendices, this report includes an introduction and sections of both fauna and flora nomenclature. Each covers the main activities conducted since CoP16 and the proposed work program for the next period. 5. Nomenclatural recommendations of the Animals and Plants Committees, calling for the amendment of the Annex to Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP16) on Standard nomenclature, are included in Annex 2 to this document. 6. As in the past, the nomenclature specialists of the Animals and Plant Committees have continued to provide timely services to the Parties and the Secretariat. These included: responding to enquiries regarding the nomenclature of taxa listed in the Appendices; designating appropriate taxonomic authorities for the nomenclature of taxa listed in the Appendices that are not included in standard references adopted by the Parties; reviewing the nomenclature of the taxa listed in the Appendices, in consultation with the Secretariat; reviewing the nomenclature of species proposed for listing in the Appendices prior to their consideration at the meetings of the Conference of the Parties; and advising the Secretariat of recommended changes in nomenclature that should be used in the Appendices. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP17 Doc. 81.1 – p. 1 General issues New layout for the Annex of Resolution 12.11 (Rev. CoP 16) 7 Over the last ten years, the number of publications that the Parties adopted concerning the nomenclature for different animal groups has increased tremendously. It has become quite difficult to identify which is the reference literature for separate groups such as Cetacea, Primates, Iguanidae, Boidae, Elapidae or Trionychidae. Adopting new overall checklists for higher taxa such as birds or Testudines only solves this problem temporarily. Annex 1 shows a modified layout for presenting the standard nomenclature references in the Annex to Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP16). This new layout is recommended by the Animals Committee, in collaboration with the Secretariat, in order to facilitate the future use of this source of information. All changes indicated in paragraphs 11-13, 16-19 and 21 of this report have already been integrated in this revision. Annex 2 gives an overview of the recommended changes to the Annex of Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP16) in its current layout. Fauna Nomenclatural tasks referred to the Animals Committee at CoP15 and CoP16 8. Corals Decision 15.64 (a) requires the Animals Committee to "identify existing coral reference materials that could be adopted as standard nomenclatural references for CITES-listed corals". As it had not been possible to identify references serving this purpose between CoP15 and CoP16, a coral species list provided by UNEP-WCMC was adopted at CoP16 as an interim solution, leaving the task still open. This issue has been discussed at AC27 and AC28. Two different reference sources have been identified by the Animals Committee that might serve as a basis for general nomenclature reference for corals: 1) a time-specific version of the WoRMS database, and 2) a new website for Corals of the World by John VERON, which is in preparation. For the time being, it is recommended to continue using the interim nomenclature reference for corals, and explore further possibilities to use the databases indicated above in the hope that a new standard nomenclatural reference for CITES-listed corals may be adopted at the 18th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP18). The tasks in Decision 15.64 (b), for the Animals Committee to “update its list of coral taxa for which identification to genus level is acceptable, but which should be identified to species level where feasible,” and to “provide the updated list to the Secretariat for dissemination”, remain uncompleted because it requires the prior adoption of new standard nomenclature references for corals. Decision 15.65 calls upon the Secretariat, when receiving the updated list from the Animals Committee, to transmit this information to the Parties through a Notification to the Parties, and to publish the list on the CITES website. The list of coral taxa in CITES Notification 2013/35 - with changes indicated - is in line with the currently adopted interim nomenclature reference for corals. Therefore, Decision 15.65 can be regarded as fulfilled for the time being. An update will only be necessary once a new standard nomenclature references for corals will have been adopted. The Animals Committee therefore recommends the adoption of new decisions, found in Annex 3 of this report, and the deletion of Decisions 15.64 and 15.65. 9. Hippocampus At CoP16, Australia asked for the recognition of a number of Hippocampus species. As this request had been made after Annex 6 (Rev.1) of document CoP16 Doc 43.1 (Rev.1) had been adopted, it was agreed to refer the discussion of this issue to the next Animals Committee meeting. It was addressed at AC27 and AC28, especially with inputs from the Australian Scientific Authority on the one hand, and the IUCN/SSC Seahorse, Pipefish and Stickleback Specialist Group on the other. However, there remained differences of opinion between these two sides which could not be resolved during the AC meetings, and further information is needed. The Animals Committee therefore recommends further discussion of this issue and any additional available information at CoP17. CoP17 Doc. 81.1 – p. 2 Lack of standard nomenclature references for broad animal groups, and not only for species currently listed in CITES Appendices 10. At AC27, the unfortunate situation was discussed that for new species proposed for inclusion in the CITES Appendices, it often happens that the taxa concerned are not covered by the nomenclature references listed in Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP16) (e.g. new shark species included in Appendix II at CoP16). The Committee recommended that this problem be addressed by requesting the CITES Secretariat to approach the copyright holders for the databases currently serving as source for the downloaded checklists of amphibians, fish and spider species, and to request for a time-specific version of these databases. These could then be used as nomenclatural standard reference for these taxon groups in case of CITES discussions of taxa not currently listed in the Appendices, for example in the context of new listing proposals. At AC28, the Secretariat reported to have contacted the copyright owners of the relevant databases. At the time of writing (June 2015), it had received two replies. In the case of the World Spider Catalogue(http://wsc.nmbe.ch), a biannually generated archive version would be available for use as a time-specific version. For the Amphibians of the World database (http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/), there was no such version available for the time being. The Secretariat indicated that it will continue to reach out to the relevant copyright holders and, upon request, provide an oral update on this matter at the Animals Committee meeting. The Animals Committee commended the CITES Secretariat to continue its efforts to explore the possibilities for time-specific versions of the databases for amphibians, fish and spider species and requested the Secretariat to report back on its progress at CoP17. The nomenclature specialist prepared a draft decision for continued work on this issue in case this matter remains unresolved at CoP17 (see Annex 4). New or updated nomenclature checklists for CITES listed species 11. Chamaeleonidae and the genus Phelsuma The number of standard nomenclature references for chameleon species and species of the genus Phelsuma has increased significantly (only for chameleons, there
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptile-Like Physiology in Early Jurassic Stem-Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Reptile-like physiology in Early Jurassic stem-mammals Authors: Elis Newham1*, Pamela G. Gill2,3*, Philippa Brewer3, Michael J. Benton2, Vincent Fernandez4,5, Neil J. Gostling6, David Haberthür7, Jukka Jernvall8, Tuomas Kankanpää9, Aki 5 Kallonen10, Charles Navarro2, Alexandra Pacureanu5, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff11, Kelly Richards12, Kate Robson-Brown13, Philipp Schneider14, Heikki Suhonen10, Paul Tafforeau5, Katherine Williams14, & Ian J. Corfe8*. Affiliations: 10 1School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3Earth Science Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 4Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 5European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. 15 6School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 7Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 8Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 9Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 10Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 20 11Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Zentrum für Material-und Küstenforschung GmbH Germany. 12Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 13Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 14Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Proteins Predicted from Genomic Sequences
    Vertebrate proteins predicted from genomic sequences VWD C8 TIL PTS Mucin2_WxxW F5_F8_type_C FCGBP_N VWC Lethenteron_camtschaticum Cyclostomata; Hyperoartia; Petromyzontiformes; Petromyzontidae; Lethenteron Lethenteron_camtschaticum.0.pep1 Petromyzon_marinus Cyclostomata; Hyperoartia; Petromyzontiformes; Petromyzontidae; Petromyzon Petromyzon_marinus.0.pep1 Callorhinchus_milii Gnathostomata; Chondrichthyes; Holocephali; Chimaeriformes; Callorhinchidae; Callorhinchus Callorhinchus_milii.0.pep1 Callorhinchus_milii Gnathostomata; Chondrichthyes; Holocephali; Chimaeriformes; Callorhinchidae; Callorhinchus Callorhinchus_milii.0.pep2 Callorhinchus_milii Gnathostomata; Chondrichthyes; Holocephali; Chimaeriformes; Callorhinchidae; Callorhinchus Callorhinchus_milii.0.pep3 Lepisosteus_oculatus Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Holostei; Semionotiformes; Lepisosteus_oculatus.0.pep1 Lepisosteus_oculatus Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Holostei; Semionotiformes; Lepisosteus_oculatus.0.pep2 Lepisosteus_oculatus Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Holostei; Semionotiformes; Lepisosteus_oculatus.0.pep3 Lepisosteus_oculatus Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Holostei; Semionotiformes; Lepisosteus_oculatus.1.pep1 TILa Cynoglossus_semilaevis Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Actinopteri; Neopterygii; Teleostei; Cynoglossus_semilaevis.1.pep1
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overwintering in Tegu Lizards
    Overwintering in Tegu Lizards DENIS V. ANDRADE,1 COLIN SANDERS,1, 2 WILLIAM K. MILSOM,2 AND AUGUSTO S. ABE1 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brasil 2 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Abstract. The tegu, Tupinambis merianae, is a large South American teiid lizard, which is active only during part of the year (hot summer months), spending the cold winter months sheltered in burrows in the ground. This pattern of activity is accompanied by seasonal changes in preferred body temperature, metabolism, and cardiorespiratory function. In the summer months these changes are quite large, but during dormancy, the circadian changes in body temperature observed during the active season are abandoned and the tegus stay in the burrow and al- low body temperature to conform to the ambient thermal profile of the shelter. Metabolism is significantly depressed during dormancy and relatively insensitive to alterations in body temperature. As metabolism is lowered, ventilation, gas exchange, and heart rate are adjusted to match the level of metabolic demand, with concomitant changes in blood gases, blood oxygen transport capacity, and acid-base equilibrium. Seasonality and the Tegu Life Cycle As with any other ectothermic organism, the tegu lizard, Tupinambis merianae, depends on external heat sources to regulate body temperature. Although this type of thermoregulatory strategy conserves energy by avoiding the use of me- tabolism for heat production (Pough, 1983), it requires that the animal inhabit a suitable thermal environment to sustain activity. When the environment does not provide the range of temperatures that enables the animal to be active year round, many species of ectothermic vertebrates become seasonally inactive (Gregory, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Cfreptiles & Amphibians
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES &IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 26(2):121–122 • AUG 2019 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES Mating. Chasing Bullsnakes ( Pituophisof catenifer Argentine sayi) in Wisconsin: Black-and-white On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared HistoryTegus of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis(Salvator) and Humans on Grenada: merianae ) A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 inRESEARCH Miami-Dade ARTICLES County, Florida, USA . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (AnolisJenna equestris M.) in FloridaCole, Cassidy Klovanish, and Frank J. Mazzotti .............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314 ([email protected]) CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More Than Mammals .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Variation in Extant Species Enables Systematic Identification of New Zealand's Large, Subfossil Diplodactylids
    Scarsbrook et al. BMC Ecol Evo (2021) 21:67 BMC Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01808-7 RESEARCH Open Access Skeletal variation in extant species enables systematic identifcation of New Zealand’s large, subfossil diplodactylids Lachie Scarsbrook1*, Emma Sherratt2, Rodney A. Hitchmough3 and Nicolas J. Rawlence1 Abstract New Zealand’s diplodactylid geckos exhibit high species-level diversity, largely independent of discernible osteologi- cal changes. Consequently, systematic afnities of isolated skeletal elements (fossils) are primarily determined by comparisons of size, particularly in the identifcation of Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, New Zealand’s largest extant gecko species. Here, three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of maxillae (a common fossilized element) was used to determine whether consistent shape and size diferences exist between genera, and if cryptic extinctions have occurred in subfossil ‘Hoplodactylus cf. duvaucelii’. Sampling included 13 diplodactylid species from fve genera, and 11 Holocene subfossil ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ individuals. We found phylogenetic history was the most important predictor of maxilla morphology among extant diplodactylid genera. Size comparisons could only diferentiate Hoplodactylus from other genera, with the remaining genera exhibiting variable degrees of overlap. Six subfossils were positively identifed as H. duvaucelii, confrming their proposed Holocene distribution throughout New Zealand. Conversely, fve subfossils showed no clear afnities with any modern diplodactylid genera, implying either increased morphological diversity in mainland ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ or the presence of at least one extinct, large, broad-toed diplodactylid species. Keywords: Diplodactylidae, Ecomorphology, Geometric morphometrics, Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, Taxonomy Background (e.g. coloration and scalation), with interspecifc skeletal New Zealand’s lizard fauna is characteristic of isolated variation rarely analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Factors of Bilaterian Evolution Peter Heger1*, Wen Zheng1†, Anna Rottmann1, Kristen a Panfilio2,3, Thomas Wiehe1
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution Peter Heger1*, Wen Zheng1†, Anna Rottmann1, Kristen A Panfilio2,3, Thomas Wiehe1 1Institute for Genetics, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 2Institute for Zoology: Developmental Biology, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom Abstract The Cambrian explosion was a unique animal radiation ~540 million years ago that produced the full range of body plans across bilaterians. The genetic mechanisms underlying these events are unknown, leaving a fundamental question in evolutionary biology unanswered. Using large-scale comparative genomics and advanced orthology evaluation techniques, we identified 157 bilaterian-specific genes. They include the entire Nodal pathway, a key regulator of mesoderm development and left-right axis specification; components for nervous system development, including a suite of G-protein-coupled receptors that control physiology and behaviour, the Robo- Slit midline repulsion system, and the neurotrophin signalling system; a high number of zinc finger transcription factors; and novel factors that previously escaped attention. Contradicting the current view, our study reveals that genes with bilaterian origin are robustly associated with key features in extant bilaterians, suggesting a causal relationship. *For correspondence: [email protected] Introduction The taxon Bilateria consists of multicellular animals
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME
    RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME §4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS September 25, 2018 PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzgerald, LA, JM Chani, and OE Donadio
    Fitzgerald, L.A., J.M. Chani, and O.E. Donadio. 1991. Tupinambis lizards in Argentina: Implementing management of a traditionally exploited resource. Pages 303-316 in Robinson, J. and K. Redford, eds. “Neotropical Wildlife: Use and Conservation”. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA. Current Address: Texas A&M University College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences 210 Nagle Hall College Station, Texas 77843-2258 21 Tupinambis Lizards in Argentina: Implementing Management of a ~aditionally Exploited Resource LEE A. FITZGERALD, Jos~ MARIA CHANI, AND OSCAR E. DONADio 1\vo speciesof tegu lizards of the generaTupinambis, 1: teguixin, and 1: rufes- cens (fig. 21.1), are heavily exploited for their skins in Argentina. Each year, more than 1,250,000 skins are exportedfrom Argentina to the United States, Canada,Mexico, Hong Kong, Japan, and severalEuropean countries. Some skins are reexportedor madeinto exotic leatheraccessories, but the majority of the tegus are destinedto becomecowboy boots in Texas(Hemley 1984a).Sur- prisingly, the trade has continued at this level for at least 10 years (Hemley 1984a:Norman 1987). An internal Argentine market also exists foltegu skins, but it hasnot beenquantified. The large trade in Tupinambishas causedconcern among some government and nongovernmentorganizations because the biology of the lizards is essen- tially undescribed,and the effectson the tegu populationsand associatedbiotic communitiesof removing more than one million individuals annually are un- known. Although population declineshave not beendocumented, it seemspru- dent to study Tupinambisbiology and formulate long-term managementand conservationplans if the ecological, economic, and cultural valuesof the re- sourceare to be guaranteed. The Tupinambistrade is important to the Argentine economy.The export valueof the resourceis worth millions of dollars annually,and for rural peoples in northern Argentina with low wagesor intermittent employment,tegu hunt- ing is a significant sourceof income.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Reptilia, Pygopodidae, Hoplodactylus
    Zootaxa 792: 1–11 (2004) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 792 Copyright © 2004 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Hoplodactylus (Reptilia: Pygopodidae) from the Takitimu Mountains, South Island, New Zealand TONY R. JEWELL1 & RICHARD A. B. LESCHEN2* 1 216 Ripponvale Road, R.D., Cromwell, New Zealand 2 New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand, [email protected] * Address correspondence to R. Leschen Abstract A gecko from alpine scree in the Takitimu Mountains, South Island, New Zealand, is described as Hoplodactylus cryptozoicus n. sp. Hoplodactylus cryptozoicus is characterized by an orange mouth lining, a short tail, minute body scales, and a distinctive colour pattern which includes bright orange patches. It may be closely related to H. nebulosus (McCann) based on the sharing of grey pigment on the tongue. Hoplodactylus cryptozoicus is known from only a single locality and is one of the few species of Hoplodactylus in New Zealand that inhabits rocks in the alpine zone. Key words: Reptilia; taxonomy; endemism; conservation Introduction The New Zealand gecko fauna presently comprises 18 validly named species placed into two endemic genera of the Diplodactylinae, Hoplodactylus Fitzinger 1843 and Naultinus Gray 1842. Both genera occur throughout the country and remain poorly studied with sev- eral species needing to be described. Most species, in fact, are threatened and/or of con- servation importance (Hitchmough 2002). Even though there are only a handful of species, taxonomic revisions are lacking with the last monograph that of McCann (1955). Since that time five species were described in the 1980’s (Robb 1980; Thomas 1981; Whi- taker 1985), including the mysterious Hoplodactylus delcourti Bauer and Russell, the larg- est species of gecko in the world and known from a single specimen (Bauer and Russell 1986, 1987; Russell and Bauer 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenomic Perspective on the Radiation of Ray-Finned Fishes Based Upon Targeted Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements
    1 A phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of 2 ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of 3 ultraconserved elements 1;2;∗ 1;2 1 1 4 Michael E. Alfaro , Brant C. Faircloth , Laurie Sorenson , Francesco Santini 1 5 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 6 These authors contributed equally to this work 7 ∗ E-mail: [email protected] arXiv:1210.0120v1 [q-bio.PE] 29 Sep 2012 1 8 Summary 9 Ray-finned fishes constitute the dominant radiation of vertebrates with over 30,000 species. 10 Although molecular phylogenetics has begun to disentangle major evolutionary relationships 11 within this vast section of the Tree of Life, there is no widely available approach for effi- 12 ciently collecting phylogenomic data within fishes, leaving much of the enormous potential 13 of massively parallel sequencing technologies for resolving major radiations in ray-finned 14 fishes unrealized. Here, we provide a genomic perspective on longstanding questions regard- 15 ing the diversification of major groups of ray-finned fishes through targeted enrichment of 16 ultraconserved nuclear DNA elements (UCEs) and their flanking sequence. Our workflow 17 efficiently and economically generates data sets that are orders of magnitude larger than 18 those produced by traditional approaches and is well-suited to working with museum speci- 19 mens. Analysis of the UCE data set recovers a well-supported phylogeny at both shallow and 20 deep time-scales that supports a monophyletic relationship between Amia and Lepisosteus 21 (Holostei) and reveals elopomorphs and then osteoglossomorphs to be the earliest diverging 22 teleost lineages.
    [Show full text]