Conf. 12.11 Nomenclatura Normalizada (Rev
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals. -
Extinction Risk in Lizards Life-Histor
For Consideration In: Biological Conservation Article Type: Research Paper Running Title: Extinction risk in lizards Life-history traits and extrinsic threats determine extinction risk in New Zealand lizards Reid Tingleya, Rod A. Hitchmoughb and David G. Chapplec,d* aARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia bDepartment of Conservation, PO Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand cAllan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand dSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. G. Chapple), [email protected] (R. Tingley), [email protected] (R. A. Hitchmough) *Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9905 3015 1 1 2 ABSTRACT 3 A species’ vulnerability to extinction depends on extrinsic threats such as habitat loss, as well 4 as its intrinsic ability to respond or adapt to such threats. Here we investigate the relative 5 roles of extrinsic threats and intrinsic biological traits in determining extinction risk in the 6 lizard fauna of New Zealand. Consistent with the results of previous studies on mammals and 7 birds, we find that habitat specialization, body size and geographic range size are the 8 strongest predictors of extinction risk. However, our analyses also reveal that lizards that 9 occupy areas with high levels of annual rainfall and are exposed to exotic predators and high 10 human population densities are at greater risk. Thus, while the intrinsic traits that render 11 species prone to extinction appear largely congruent across vertebrate taxa, our findings 12 illustrate that both extrinsic threats and intrinsic traits need to be considered in order to 13 accurately predict, and hence prevent, future population declines. -
PRAVILNIK O PREKOGRANIĈNOM PROMETU I TRGOVINI ZAŠTIĆENIM VRSTAMA ("Sl
PRAVILNIK O PREKOGRANIĈNOM PROMETU I TRGOVINI ZAŠTIĆENIM VRSTAMA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 99/2009 i 6/2014) I OSNOVNE ODREDBE Ĉlan 1 Ovim pravilnikom propisuju se: uslovi pod kojima se obavlja uvoz, izvoz, unos, iznos ili tranzit, trgovina i uzgoj ugroţenih i zaštićenih biljnih i ţivotinjskih divljih vrsta (u daljem tekstu: zaštićene vrste), njihovih delova i derivata; izdavanje dozvola i drugih akata (potvrde, sertifikati, mišljenja); dokumentacija koja se podnosi uz zahtev za izdavanje dozvola, sadrţina i izgled dozvole; spiskovi vrsta, njihovih delova i derivata koji podleţu izdavanju dozvola, odnosno drugih akata; vrste, njihovi delovi i derivati ĉiji je uvoz odnosno izvoz zabranjen, ograniĉen ili obustavljen; izuzeci od izdavanja dozvole; naĉin obeleţavanja ţivotinja ili pošiljki; naĉin sprovoĊenja nadzora i voĊenja evidencije i izrada izveštaja. Ĉlan 2 Izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom pravilniku imaju sledeće znaĉenje: 1) datum sticanja je datum kada je primerak uzet iz prirode, roĊen u zatoĉeništvu ili veštaĉki razmnoţen, ili ukoliko takav datum ne moţe biti dokazan, sledeći datum kojim se dokazuje prvo posedovanje primeraka; 2) deo je svaki deo ţivotinje, biljke ili gljive, nezavisno od toga da li je u sveţem, sirovom, osušenom ili preraĊenom stanju; 3) derivat je svaki preraĊeni deo ţivotinje, biljke, gljive ili telesna teĉnost. Derivati većinom nisu prepoznatljivi deo primerka od kojeg potiĉu; 4) država porekla je drţava u kojoj je primerak uzet iz prirode, roĊen i uzgojen u zatoĉeništvu ili veštaĉki razmnoţen; 5) druga generacija potomaka -
Annex 1 6548/15 ADD 1 /Sm DG E 1A
Vijeće Europske unije Bruxelles, 25. veljače 2015. (OR. en) 6548/15 ADD 1 ENV 80 WTO 52 NASLOVNICA Od: Europska komisija Datum primitka: 24. veljače 2015. Za: Glavno tajništvo Vijeća Br. dok. Kom.: D038446/01 - Annex 1 Predmet: PRILOG Uredbi Komisije (EU) …/.. o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 865/2006 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 338/97 u odnosu na trgovinu vrstama divlje faune i flore Za delegacije se u privitku nalazi dokument D038446/01 - Annex 1. Priloženo: D038446/01 - Annex 1 6548/15 ADD 1 /sm DG E 1A HR EUROPSKA KOMISIJA Bruxelles, XXX D038446/01 […](2015) XXX draft ANNEX 1 PRILOG UREDBI KOMISIJE (EU) …/.. o izmjeni Uredbe (EZ) br. 865/2006 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 338/97 u odnosu na trgovinu vrstama divlje faune i flore HR HR PRILOG Prilozi Uredbi (EZ) br. 865/2006 izmjenjuju se kako slijedi: (1) Prilog VIII. zamjenjuje se sljedećim: „PRILOG VIII. Standardne reference za nomenklaturu kojima se u skladu s člankom 5. stavkom 4. treba koristiti pri navođenju znanstvenih naziva vrsta u dozvolama i potvrdama FAUNA (a) MAMMALIA (sisavci) WILSON, D. E. & REEDER, D. M. (ed.) (2005): Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition, Vol. 1-2, xxxv + 2142 pp. Baltimore (John Hopkins University Press). [za sve sisavce – izuzimajući priznavanje sljedećih naziva za divlje oblike vrsta (umjesto naziva za domaće oblike): Bos gaurus, Bos mutus, Bubalus arnee, Equus africanus, Equus przewalskii, Ovis orientalis ophion; izuzimajući vrste navedene u nastavku] BEASLY, I., ROBERTSON, K. M. & ARNOLD, P. W. -
Conf. 12.11 Nomenclature Normalisée (Rev
Conf. 12.11 Nomenclature normalisée (Rev. CoP17) RAPPELANT la résolution Conf. 11.22, adoptée à la 11e session de la Conférence des Parties (Gigiri, 2000); CONSTATANT que la nomenclature biologique est dynamique; SACHANT que la normalisation des noms des genres et des espèces de plusieurs familles est nécessaire et que l'absence actuelle d'une liste de référence normalisée et d'informations adéquates diminue l'efficacité de l'application de la CITES pour la conservation de nombreuses espèces inscrites aux annexes; RECONNAISSANT que la taxonomie utilisée dans les annexes à la Convention sera très utile aux Parties si elle est normalisée par une nomenclature de référence; SACHANT que l’ancien Comité de la nomenclature a identifié des noms de taxons dans les annexes à la Convention qui devraient être changés pour refléter l'usage agréé en biologie; NOTANT que ces changements devraient être adoptés par la Conférence des Parties à la Convention; RECONNAISSANT que pour plusieurs taxons inscrits aux annexes, il existe des formes domestiquées et que, dans plusieurs cas, les Parties ont choisi de distinguer la forme sauvage de la forme domestiquée en appliquant à cette dernière un nom différent de celui qui figure dans la nomenclature normalisée pour la forme protégée; RECONNAISSANT qu'en ce qui concerne les nouvelles propositions d'inscription d'espèces aux annexes, les Parties devraient, lorsque c'est possible, utiliser les références normalisées adoptées; CONSIDERANT la grande difficulté pratique de reconnaître bon nombre de sous-espèces inscrites -
AC26 Doc. 20 Annex 1 English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais
AC26 Doc. 20 Annex 1 English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais Fauna: new species and other taxonomic changes relating to species listed in the EC wildlife trade regulations January, 2012 A report to the European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre AC26 Doc. 20, Annex 1 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org CITATION ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION UNEP-WCMC. 2012. Fauna: new species and MONITORING CENTRE other taxonomic changes relating to species The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring listed in the EC wildlife trade regulations. A Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, report to the European Commission. UNEP- UK, is the specialist biodiversity information WCMC, Cambridge. and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run PREPARED FOR cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity The contents of this report do not necessarily knowledge the Centre provides authoritative, reflect the views or policies of UNEP or strategic and timely information for contributory organisations. The designations conventions, countries and organisations to use employed and the presentations do not imply in the development and implementation of the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on their policies and decisions. -
An Assessment of the Suitability of Captive-Bred Founders for Lizard Restoration Projects Using Duvaucel’S Geckos (Hoplodactylus Duvaucelii)
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. An assessment of the suitability of captive-bred founders for lizard restoration projects using Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. Vivienne Glenday 2016 Abstract Sourcing founders for species restoration projects can be problematic, especially when using rare or endangered animals. Harvesting from small natural populations could be detrimental to those populations. A possible solution is to use captive-bred founders as this would reduce harvesting pressure on natural source populations. In the summer of 2013, a combination of captive-bred and wild-sourced Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii) were released on two islands in Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf. To assess the suitability of captive-bred founders for species restoration projects, short-term survival, condition, reproductive performance, dispersal and activity patterns, and habitat use were investigated using mark-recapture surveys and radio telemetry over a 12 month period following the release, and comparisons were made between captive-bred and wild- sourced geckos. Captive-bred geckos were encountered more often than wild geckos one year after the release, and had greater increases in body condition index. They also had better overall health, but more partial tail losses. Gravid females from both groups were encountered during the first post-release breeding season and at least 50% of juveniles were encountered alive during the first year. -
Cop16 Doc. 43.2 (Rev
Idioma original: inglés CoP16 Doc. 43.2 (Rev. 1) CONVENCIÓN SOBRE EL COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL DE ESPECIES AMENAZADAS DE FAUNA Y FLORA SILVESTRES ____________________ Decimosexta reunión de la Conferencia de las Partes Bangkok (Tailandia), 3-14 de marzo de 2013 Interpretación y aplicación de la Convención Control del comercio y marcado Nomenclatura normalizada NOMENCLATURA NORMALIZADA PARA ESPECIES DE HIPPOCAMPUS 1. El presente documento ha sido presentado por Suiza*. 2. Durante la 26ª reunión del Comité de Fauna, el Grupo de Trabajo sobre Nomenclatura recomendó que se adoptara el extracto del “Catálogo de Peces” (http://www.cites.org/common/com/AC/26/E26-20-A4.pdf) como referencia de nomenclatura normalizada para todas las especies de peces, con excepción del género Hippocampus. La principal razón para excluir Hippocampus se debió a numerosas diferencias identificadas entre los nombres de especies aceptados actualmente en el marco de la CITES que se han derivado de varias publicaciones y del Catálogo de Peces. Los miembros del Grupo de Trabajo acordaron recomendar que se mantuvieran las referencias de nomenclatura existentes para las especies de Hippocampus [incluidas en el Anexo de la Resolución Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP15)], con la adición de las cinco nuevas especies de Hippocampus descritas y a las que se hace referencia en la página 14 del Anexo 1 del documento AC26 Doc. 20 (http://www.cites.org/common/com/AC/26/E26-20-A1.pdf) Lamentablemente, debido a un descuido, esta última recomendación de aceptar las cinco nuevas especies de Hippocampus se omitió en el informe del GT al Comité de Fauna, por lo que no pudo ser considerada por los miembros del Comité. -
DOCDM-1023668 Herpetofauna: Photo-Identification V1.0 2
Herpetofauna: photo-identification Version 1.0 This specification was prepared by Marieke Lettink in 2012. Contents Synopsis .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 5 Advantages ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Disadvantages ................................................................................................................................. 6 Suitability for inventory ..................................................................................................................... 6 Suitability for monitoring ................................................................................................................... 6 Skills ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Resources ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Minimum attributes .......................................................................................................................... 7 Data storage ................................................................................................................................... -
Skeletal Variation in Extant Species Enables Systematic Identification of New Zealand's Large, Subfossil Diplodactylids
Scarsbrook et al. BMC Ecol Evo (2021) 21:67 BMC Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01808-7 RESEARCH Open Access Skeletal variation in extant species enables systematic identifcation of New Zealand’s large, subfossil diplodactylids Lachie Scarsbrook1*, Emma Sherratt2, Rodney A. Hitchmough3 and Nicolas J. Rawlence1 Abstract New Zealand’s diplodactylid geckos exhibit high species-level diversity, largely independent of discernible osteologi- cal changes. Consequently, systematic afnities of isolated skeletal elements (fossils) are primarily determined by comparisons of size, particularly in the identifcation of Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, New Zealand’s largest extant gecko species. Here, three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of maxillae (a common fossilized element) was used to determine whether consistent shape and size diferences exist between genera, and if cryptic extinctions have occurred in subfossil ‘Hoplodactylus cf. duvaucelii’. Sampling included 13 diplodactylid species from fve genera, and 11 Holocene subfossil ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ individuals. We found phylogenetic history was the most important predictor of maxilla morphology among extant diplodactylid genera. Size comparisons could only diferentiate Hoplodactylus from other genera, with the remaining genera exhibiting variable degrees of overlap. Six subfossils were positively identifed as H. duvaucelii, confrming their proposed Holocene distribution throughout New Zealand. Conversely, fve subfossils showed no clear afnities with any modern diplodactylid genera, implying either increased morphological diversity in mainland ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ or the presence of at least one extinct, large, broad-toed diplodactylid species. Keywords: Diplodactylidae, Ecomorphology, Geometric morphometrics, Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, Taxonomy Background (e.g. coloration and scalation), with interspecifc skeletal New Zealand’s lizard fauna is characteristic of isolated variation rarely analysed. -
Canada Gazette, Part II
Vol. 154, No. 18 Vol. 154, no 18 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part II Partie II OTTAWA, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2020 OTTAWA, LE MERCREDI 2 SEPTEMBRE 2020 Statutory Instruments 2020 Textes réglementaires 2020 SOR/2020-175 to 181 and SI/2020-60 to 62 DORS/2020-175 à 181 et TR/2020-60 à 62 Pages 1994 to 2260 Pages 1994 à 2260 Notice to Readers Avis au lecteur The Canada Gazette, Part II, is published under the La Partie II de la Gazette du Canada est publiée en vertu authority of the Statutory Instruments Act on January 8, de la Loi sur les textes réglementaires le 8 janvier 2020, et 2020, and at least every second Wednesday thereafter. au moins tous les deux mercredis par la suite. Part II of the Canada Gazette contains all “regulations” as La Partie II de la Gazette du Canada est le recueil des defined in the Statutory Instruments Act and certain « règlements » définis comme tels dans la loi précitée et other classes of statutory instruments and documents de certaines autres catégories de textes réglementaires et required to be published therein. However, certain de documents qu’il est prescrit d’y publier. Cependant, regulations and classes of regulations are exempt from certains règlements et catégories de règlements sont publication by section 15 of the Statutory Instruments soustraits à la publication par l’article 15 du Règlement Regulations made pursuant to section 20 of the Statutory sur les textes réglementaires, établi en vertu de l’article 20 Instruments Act. de la Loi sur les textes réglementaires. -
Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated