DOCSLIB.ORG

COPENHAGEN - Pilot Form 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COPENHAGEN - Pilot Form 1 COPENHAGEN - pilot form 1 Copenhagen Overview1 Socio-economic and land use data Type of pilot case Municipality Number of inhabitants 601,448 (2016) Total area 88,6 km² 72,7 km² Total urban area 82 % of total land area 15,9 km² Total nature & open space area 18 % of total land area 31,7 km² Total coastal area 36 % of total land area Tourism 2-3 days Average length of stay (1.9 days in average in 2014) Number of tourist accommodation establishments 103 (2015) Total number of tourist arrivals 5.525.594 (2016) UK, Sweden, India, Norway, the USA, More frequent countries of origin of the tourists Germany, Italy the Netherlands, France and China 1 Sources: URBAN-WASTE deliverables: D2.5, D2.7; data provided by the pilot case. COPENHAGEN - pilot form 2 ● The high season peak for tourism in Copenhagen is in July. ● Most of the tourists are staying in hotels, many of them being eco-labelled. ● Several eco-labelled hotels in the city (~50 out of 85 hotels in total) ● 15 camping sites in the region Type of tourism and activities Copenhagen as the capital of Denmark is an important historical, economic and political city. Its tourist attractiveness is based on diversified points of interest: A vast heritage of castles, gardens and museums. Many of which are open and free for the public. Copenhagen offers both classical design icons and modern architectural wonders. Copenhagen today is the home of New Nordic cuisine and 16 Michelin starred restaurants. Clean harbours, organic restaurants, bikes and bike lanes, parks and green oasis - all the reasons making Copenhagen a sustainable destination. 45% of the inhabitants of Copenhagen ride a bicycle to work or school. Copenhagen is a long time frontrunner for the LGBT movement. Copenhagen is also a city of festivals: 14 in 2019 from rock, jazz, suburban dance to design, photo and cooking festival Wonderful Copenhagen (a network organization to promote tourism in Greater Copenhagen Area) has launched the first strategy for sustainable tourism in 2018 “Tourism for Good” to prevent visitors’ pressure in the future through four different focus areas: Broadening tourism to areas outside the city centre’s boundaries and, hence, offering tourists a much wider choice of activities and richer experiences. Guide tourists towards responsible consumption and behaviour by promoting sustainable products and ways of transportation. Partnerships are to be formed in order for information and measurements to get collected so that increased knowledge on sustainability is acquired and passed along. Wonderful Copenhagen has chosen to lead by example, taking the greatest possible sustainability considerations when it comes to its own operations COPENHAGEN - pilot form 3 Type of tourists2 12% of Danish tourists and 81% of international tourists were first-time visitors to Copenhagen. 30% of Danish tourists and 15% of international tourists had been to Copenhagen one to three times prior. 82% travelled with one or more adults and 73% travelled without any kids. Almost half of the Danish respondents were in the age group 36-45, while the highest percentage of international respondents was 26% in the age group 26-35. The average age for the Danish respondents was 45, while the average age for the international respondents was 42. 2 According to Copenhagen card user survey – 2017. COPENHAGEN - pilot form 4 Waste data3 Main types of waste prevention actions regarding URBAN WASTE objectives In the city of Copenhagen, there are different prevention actions that can or could target also the waste produced by tourists. ● Prevention of food waste is a main issue for both households and businesses. A range of measures are taken helping different stakeholders to prevent food waste e.g. social supermarkets, mobile phone apps, restaurants providing guests with doggy bags, cooperation with retailers, teaching households as well as staff in large kitchens to use food items close to “best before”‐date, awareness raising on food waste, but also trust based certification (Refood label). ● In terms of reuse, there are many recycling hubs with swap facilities in the city (16 centers), many second-hand and antiques shops. There are also initiative in touristic places, such as the Tivoli Park where there are only reusable plastic cups with a deposit and return system. Organization of waste collection for households Responsibility ● Copenhagen municipality is responsible for MSW collection from all households, public institutions and small businesses located in residential buildings. ● The collection is operated by private companies. ● One specific aspect regarding waste management in the City of Copenhagen is that the municipality is only in charge of waste from households and is not allowed to collect waste from private companies. The private companies are obliged to manage their own waste in compliance with the municipal waste management regulation. ● Waste from street bins and street sweeping is not under the waste authority’s administration, but falls under another department in The Technical and Environmental Administration in the City of Copenhagen. ● The City of Copenhagen has a current “Resource and Waste Management Plan” that has been introduced for the period 2019-2024. 3 Sources: URBAN-WASTE deliverables: D2.5, D2.7; data provided by the pilot case. COPENHAGEN - pilot form 5 Financing system Denmark put in place the principle of ‘cost-coverage non-profit’ for the financing of a local authority’s waste management service. This means that waste management is not financed by taxes. Waste fees cover the costs involved, while they cannot exceed them to be used for other expenses in the city. The waste management budget in the City of Copenhagen amounts to around EUR 83 million / year. Waste fees are collected with the property tax, and there is a fixed price for recyclables, whereas the fee is volume-based for residual waste. Access to the recycling stations and hubs is free, and it is financed by a flat rate charge per year, levied with the waste fee. WASTE FEES 2017, IN EUROS Single-family households litre/week Fee, euros Residual waste bin 140 318 Residual waste bin 180 381 Residual waste bin 240 435 Recycling fee, flat rate 123 Total approximately 441–558 Flats Fixed fee per flat 31-52 Bins, per litre/week 0.70 Recycling fee, flat rate 130 Administration fee 11 Total approximately 300 Collection system ● MSW fractions are collected from kerbside and from recycling stations: Kerbside collection from households Collection from recycling stations Residual waste Small combustibles Metals Hazardous waste Plastics WEEE and cables Smaller WEEE White goods Cardboard Bulky waste Paper Metals Hazardous waste Paper Batteries Cardboard Glass (also from public collection points) Glass Organic/food waste (from September 2017) Garden waste Garden waste PVC Bulky waste (on demand) Tyres COPENHAGEN - pilot form 6 Construction and demolition waste Wood for recycling Impregnated wood Plastic Textiles Waste for landfilling ● Refund system for selected packaging materials: in Denmark there is a deposit on most containers for carbonated soft drinks, water, beer and wine (bottles, cans). The deposit encourages the consumer to return the empty beverage container for recycling and thus prevents improper disposal and littering. The amount of deposit varies dependent on the type of beverage container. Organisation of waste collection for private enterprises ● Like other businesses most touristic establishments like e.g. hotels have made arrangements with private waste collectors though some are serviced by the municipal waste collection. ● The City of Copenhagen is only in charge of waste from households and is not allowed to collect waste from private companies. The private companies are obliged to manage their own waste in compliance with the municipal waste management regulation by hiring private enterprises. Businesses are free to hire a private company collecting the waste for treatment but source segregation in recyclable fractions is compulsory (the businesses are also obliged to secure documentation). ● The waste from businesses should at least be separated into: ○ residual waste ○ cooking oil ○ paper ○ organic waste (food waste) ○ cardboard ○ hazardous waste ○ rigid plastic ○ plastic sheeting ○ glass ○ metal ○ garden waste ○ WEEE ● The city does sorting tests on the waste from households, but not from the private companies. Nevertheless, the City has advisors that visit the private companies within an existing programme and has a continuous dialogue with companies to make sure they maintain a correct sorting of waste. Even if in the end it is the waste producers who have the responsibility of sorting them correctly. COPENHAGEN - pilot form 7 350 000 300 000 250 000 200 000 Unsorted Tons 150 000 Sorted 100 000 50 000 - 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Development in the amount of waste from private companies Organisation of street sweeping and street bins collection ● Waste from street bins and street sweeping is not under the waste authority’s administration, but falls under another department in the technical and environmental administration in the City of Copenhagen. ● Litter is considered part of the street sweeping waste and therefore not included in the definition of MSW. The amount/year of street sweeping waste is stable over the past years. ● Street bin waste is sent to incineration without further segregation. COPENHAGEN - pilot form 8 Waste treatment of the most relevant waste fractions First treatment Waste fraction Treatment process destination Incineration (producing district heating Residual waste and power for the supply network) Exported from the City of Copenhagen to Recyclables other locations in Denmark or outside the country for further treatment Remark: The new incinerator (Amager Ressource Center) was constructed with a rooftop skiing slope, a hiking track and a climbing wall, in this way making the waste treatment facility an integral part of the city experiences. Specific focus on certain waste fractions/management models The city of Copenhagen is currently testing in some areas containers tagged with microchips to register when the containers are full, in order to improve the waste collection.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report
    City report City of the Future INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« »MORGENSTADT: »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report ® INNOVATION NETWORK INNOVATION Project Management City Team Leader Fraunhofer Institute for Dr. Marius Mohr Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Nobelstrasse 12 Interfacial Engineering and 70569 Stuttgart Biotechnology IGB Germany Authors Contact Andrea Rößner, Fraunhofer Institute for lndustrial Engineering IAO Alanus von Radecki Arnulf Dinkel, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE Phone +49 711 970-2169 Daniel Hiller, Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics Ernst-Mach-Institut EMI Dominik Noeren, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE COPENHAGEN [email protected] 2013 Hans Erhorn, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Heike Erhorn-Kluttig, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Dr. Marius Mohr, Fraunhofer Institute for lnterfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB OPENHAGEN © Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, München 2013 Sylvia Wahren, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA C MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS (M:CI) Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Climate change, energy and resource scarcity, a growing Copenhagen has repeatedly been recognized as one Nobelstrasse 12 Automation IFF world population and aging societies are some of the of the cities with the best quality of life. Green growth 70569 Stuttgart Mailbox 14 53 large challenges of the future. In particular, these challen- and quality of life are the two main elements in Germany 39004 Magdeburg ges must be solved within cities, which today are already Copenhagen’s vision for the future. Copenhagen shall home to more than 50% of the world’s population. An be a leading green lab for sustainable urban solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen Report
    IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge Copenhagen Report Contents 3 1. Executive summary 5 2. Introduction 5 A. The Smarter Cities Challenge 7 B. The challenge 8 3. Findings, context and roadmap 8 A. Findings and context 10 B. Roadmap of recommendations 13 4. Recommendations 21 Recommendation 1: Establish a Copenhagen Open Value Network 31 Recommendation 2: Create an integrated end-to-end energy model 39 Recommendation 3: Extend transportation and building initiatives 45 Recommendation 4: Establish a governance body 49 5. Conclusion 53 6. Appendix 53 A. Acknowledgments 58 B. Team biographies 61 C. References 2 1. Executive summary Introduction The City has decided to use data as a tool to reduce energy The City of Copenhagen, Denmark is one of 31 cities consumption and as a platform to develop new solutions to selected in 2013 to receive a Smarter Cities Challenge® help change behavior related to energy consumption. The grant as part of IBM’s citizenship efforts to build a Smarter City wants to achieve its carbon neutrality goals while fostering Planet®. During three weeks in May 2013, a team of five economic and job growth. It recognizes that data can inform IBM experts interviewed 197 stakeholders and worked decision makers who, in turn, drive the innovations they know to deliver recommendations on a key challenge identified are needed to close the emissions gap between now and 2025. by the Lord Mayor, Frank Jensen, and his senior leadership team: The City states that it needs a better strategy for using accessible data to achieve this goal, as well as a gap analysis of which data How can management of data help Copenhagen and digital infrastructures are needed to support the goal of achieve its goal of carbon neutrality by 2025? increased energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating Urban Conviviality: Urban Farming in the Shadows of Copenhagen's Neoliberalisms
    Cultivating urban conviviality urban farming in the shadows of Copenhagen's neoliberalisms Rutt, Rebecca Leigh Published in: Journal of Political Ecology DOI: 10.2458/v27i1.23749 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Rutt, R. L. (2020). Cultivating urban conviviality: urban farming in the shadows of Copenhagen's neoliberalisms. Journal of Political Ecology, 27(1), 612-634. https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23749 Download date: 30. sep.. 2021 Cultivating urban conviviality: urban farming in the shadows of Copenhagen's neoliberalisms Rebecca L. Rutt1 University of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract In this article I explore how the possibilities for commoning and conviviality through small-scale urban farming initiatives intertwine with neoliberal trends. I do this by recounting the trajectory of a small rooftop garden in the city of Copenhagen, Denmark. Drawing on ethnographic research in and around this garden, I show how such communal, anti-capitalist, eco-social endeavors are thoroughly entangled in the city's neoliberal turn over recent decades. Various manifestations of neoliberalism, ranging from formalization processes to austerity pressures, articulate with convivial urban farming initiatives in contradictory and recursive relationships that both nurture and endanger these local initiatives. I describe for example how formalization engenders legitimacy but also homogenization and how green initiatives are celebrated while undermined
    [Show full text]
  • Cities: Changes, Places, Spaces
    EUROMASTER IN URBANSTUDIES Cities: Changes, Places, Spaces Anthology of articles building on master theses from the 4Cities Master Programme in Urban Studies 6th cohort, 2013-2015 Ed. Sune W. Stoustrup Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cities:!! Changes,!Places,!Spaces! ! Anthology!of!articles!building!! on!master!theses!from!the! 4Cities!Master!Programme!! in!Urban!Studies! 6th!cohort,!2013A2015!! ! Ed.!Sune!W.!Stoustrup! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! EUROMASTER IN URBAN STUDIES ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! © Authors: Lorena Axinte, Jamie Furlong, Sandra Jurasszovich, Aliona Lyasheva, William Otchere-Darko, Lucie Rosset, Ognjen Šobat, Sune W. Stoustrup, Devon Willis Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Editor: Sune W. Stoustrup Design and layout: Sune W. Stoustrup Photo on front-page: Anja Petrović First edition published 2016 The information and views set out in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the 4CITIES Master’s Programme in Urban Studies or of the Institute for Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna. Responsibility for the information and views set out in this publication lies entirely with the authors. Published by Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Universität Wien Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Wien, Austria ISBN 978-3-900830-87-8 Editor contact: Sune W. Stoustrup Email: [email protected] Index 1 Introduction 1 Sune W. Stoustrup 2 Formalising the InforMal Temporary Use of Vacant Spaces 3
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Sustainable Development to the Domain of a Local Authority
    View metadata,Downloaded citation and from similar orbit.dtu.dk papers on:at core.ac.uk Dec 17, 2017 brought to you by CORE provided by Online Research Database In Technology Translating sustainable development to the domain of a local authority the case of urban districts in Copenhagen Nielsen, Susanne Balslev; Jensen, Jesper Ole Published in: Practicing Science and Technology, Performing the Social Publication date: 2010 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Nielsen, S. B., & Jensen, J. O. (2010). Translating sustainable development to the domain of a local authority: the case of urban districts in Copenhagen. In Practicing Science and Technology, Performing the Social: Conference Programme and USB-stick with abstracts (pp. Track 38) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. SBNi/august 28, 2010 Translating measures of sustainable development to urban districts in Copenhagen Paper for EASST 010: Practicing science and technology, performing the social.
    [Show full text]
  • Contingency, Debate, and Pop- up 'Hygge' at Valby Pavilion
    Contingency, debate, and pop- up ‘hygge’ at Valby Pavilion: Situating temporary public urban settings in design critique Anne Margrethe Wagner Assistant professor, Architect MAA University of Copenhagen Division of Landscape Architecture and Planning/IGN Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Public spaces emerge through a diverse field of practices and events that combine to make space and create meaning. In today’s design and planning practice, temporary interventions play an increasing role in the creation and rethinking of public space ‘on the go’. In such transitional interventions, ‘the project’ is both physically and symbolically created through entangled actions of design with somewhat non-designed and informal practices and DIY aesthetics, as well as various narratives and modes of communication. Temporary public spaces thereby challenge established ways of evaluating and critiquing spatial settings as determined design solutions or ‘classic’ architectural works—in terms of what they do and how they can be qualitatively understood as part of contemporary place-making approaches. This article forms a critique of the project Valby Pavilion, a temporary space in Valby (Copenhagen, Denmark) that serves as a test setup for the future use of its highly contested site. Through a juxtaposition of selected theoretical perspectives from art and architectural criticism to relational site thinking and performance studies, the discussion of the project elaborates upon which aspects require detailed attention when performing a critique of temporary urban public spaces. The article concludes that critical examination of a number of issues (intentionality and origin, the role of spatial adaptions, appropriation, events and situated public debate, dominant planning paradigms, and the characteristic aesthetics of the informal) helps to fruitfully locate public settings initiated under the ‘temporary project’ label within design and architectural critique.
    [Show full text]
  • Exporting Strategies for Urban Livability: Examining Copenhagen, Denmark As a Model City for Quality of Life Generated Through Urban Design
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Exporting Strategies for Urban Livability: Examining Copenhagen, Denmark as a Model City for Quality of Life Generated through Urban Design Austen L. Peterson Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Policy Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Austen L., "Exporting Strategies for Urban Livability: Examining Copenhagen, Denmark as a Model City for Quality of Life Generated through Urban Design". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/668 Exporting Strategies for Urban Livability: Examining Copenhagen, Denmark as a Model City for Quality of Life Generated through Urban Design A Senior Thesis in Urban Studies Austen L. Peterson Trinity College Class of 2017 Spring 2017 Recommended Citation Peterson, Austen L., “Exporting Strategies for Urban Livability: Examining Copenhagen, Denmark as a Model City for Quality of Life Generated through Urban Design.” Senior Thesis, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, 2017. Abstract Over the next fifteen years, the world’s population is expected to reach new heights at 8.5 billion people. Currently, half of the global population is living in cities,
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Traffic and Air Quality in Central Copenhagen Submitted To: Professors Melissa Belz and Zhikun Hou Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mrs
    Assessing Traffic and Air Quality in Central Copenhagen Submitted to: Professors Melissa Belz and Zhikun Hou Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mrs. Marietta Bonnet Miljøpunkt Indre By Interactive Qualifying Project (IQP) Final Report Denmark ‘15 Sakshi Khurana, Lisa Mendez, Florentia Nicole Ong, Caleb Stepanian May 1, 2015 Source: http://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/pdf/1205_zA7aIS8D1d.pdf This report represents the work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, please see http://www.wpi.edu/academics/ugradstudies/project- learning.html Abstract Sponsored by Miljøpunkt Indre By, we assessed the traffic congestion and air quality in the city center of Copenhagen, Denmark. We conducted surveys with locals, interviewed experts, and conducted direct observations of the area. After analysis of the data, we evaluated the feasibility of a tunnel, explored possible alternative solutions, and offered recommendations for alleviating congestion and reducing air pollution. We found that while a tunnel would reduce air and noise pollution, it may not be effective in reducing traffic volume. Instead, we recommend discouraging car use and promoting public transportation by incorporating a light rail system, reducing lanes, implementing a park and ride system, and improving bicycle infrastructure. i Acknowledgements We would like to thank Professors Hou, Belz and Taylor for guiding us through this process. We would also like to thank our sponsors Marietta Bonnet, Dorte Heiss and Kjeld Larsen from Miljøpunkt Indre By for warmly welcoming us to Copenhagen and being our mentors.
    [Show full text]
  • Factfile: Venue & Logistics
    Sustainable Innovation 2014 Cities & Regions as Catalysts for Smart & Sustainable Innovation 19th International Conference 3rd - 4th November 2014 KADK, Copenhagen, Denmark Welcome Welcome to the 19th International Sustainable Innovation 2014 Conference focused on ‘Cities & Regions as Catalysts for Smart & Sustainable Innovation’ organised by The Centre for Sustainable Design ® at the University for the Creative Arts (UCA) in the UK. Sustainable Innovation 2014 will take place on the 3rd and 4th November 2014 at KADK, Copenhagen, Denmark. This fact file contains information to assist delegates in organising their participation at this high level event. • Background - an introduction to the Conference • Concept and Conference Topics • Benefits of Attending • Conference Organisers • Maps • Travel Tips • Travelling to KADK • About Copenhagen • Hotels, Bed & Breakfast, Hostel, Restaurants and Pubs • Cancellation Policy • Contact Details We hope you find the following information useful and look forward to meeting you at KADK, Copenhagen, Denmark Background The Green Economy is now a core part of the global environmental policy agenda with the role of innovation becoming increasingly important. Cities play a key role in the Green Economy but are often ‘hot beds’ of environmental & social problems as a result of dense populations. However, cities are well placed to act as catalysts for the development of new sustainable solutions to transport, water, food, energy, waste & lifestyle problems due to their public purchasing power & the existence & proximity of key role players in the innovation system. Model implementation of innovative solutions are starting to surface in a number of leading smart, sustainable cities e.g. Stockholm, New York, San Francisco & Copenhagen with significant investment from industry leaders e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • DISADVANTAGED AREAS of Copenhagen
    POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS OF COPenHAGEN Contents page 4 Preface – joint responsibility, joint effort page 6 The policy in brief – focus on the things that work locally page 10 Vision – a city in balance page 14 The city's disadvantaged areas – in numbers – Copenhagen's disadvantaged areas in numbers page 20 Initiatives in disadvantaged areas – one municipality, also locally page 22 Unified efforts – operational, individual-oriented and area-based initiatives page 24 The public housing sector Text: Project group with representatives of the seven – a central partner municipal departments. Project manager: Technical and Environmental page 28 Development plans Administration, District Development – a prioritisation tool for customising solutions Design: TMF-Grafisk Design Photo: Gitte Lotinga, Copenhagen Municipality page 30 A strategy for change – from vision to concrete changes 2 POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS 3 Preface – joint responsibility, joint effort With the policy for disadvantaged areas of Copenhagen Higher population – greater differences At the same time, problems have accumulated in certain We will fulfil these goals through binding partner- we will focus our efforts on creating green growth and In 2009, Copenhagen was voted the world's best parts of the city. Among other things, this is due to ships with everyone involved, preferential treatment improving quality of life in disadvantaged parts of the city and its popularity is reflected in its population outdated housing, allocation of public housing flats of disadvantaged areas and increased focus on what city through concentrated inter-departmental efforts growth: every month, 1000 new people settle in the to people receiving social security, social problems in works: unified core operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Off for a Sustainable Future
    Take off for a sustainable future Copenhagen Airports Group Annual Report 2018 Company reg. no. (CVR) 14 70 72 04 Group Annual Report 2018 Pursuant to section 149(2) of the Danish Corporate Forward-looking statements Copenhagen Airports A/S Lufthavnsboulevarden 6 Financial Statements Act, the Group Annual responsibility statement – risk and uncertainties 2770 Kastrup Report is an extract of Copenhagen Airports’ The statutory statements on corporate This Annual Report includes forward-looking Denmark complete Annual Report. The complete responsibility and the under-represented statements as described in the US Private Annual Report, including the financial gender in accordance with sections 99a Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Tel. +45 3231 3231 statements of the Parent Company, Copen- and 99b of the Danish Financial Statements and similar acts of other jurisdictions on Fax +45 3231 3132 E-mail [email protected] hagen Airports A/S (page 160-173), and the Act are given in the management’s review forward-looking statements, including in Web www.cph.dk/en statutory corporate governance statement, ”Business model”, ”Risk management and particular statements concerning future Company reg. no. (CVR): 14 70 72 04 can be downloaded on http://www.cph. risks” and in the ”Performance” section. In revenues, operating profits, business Established: 19 September 1990 dk/en/about-cph/investor/corporate-gover- these sections, Copenhagen Airports A/S expansion and investments. Such statements Municipality of registered office: Tårnby nance. Following adoption at the Annual (CPH) explains how we worked with the are subject to risks and uncertainties, as Terms used General Meeting, the complete Annual non-financial business targets in 2018 and various factors, many of which are beyond Copenhagen Airports, CPH, the Group and Report will also be available from the Danish what results we achieved during the year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Local Transport Plans and Visions There Are Five Main Plans/Visions
    2. Local Plans and Visions transport There are five main plans/visions setting goals for transport planning and actions: The Transport and Environmental Plan 2004: The overriding objective is to assure a fully functional transportation system for the city causing substantially less environmental impact than today. The plan contains an action plan on 20 initiatives. Copenhagen’s Cycle Politic 2002-2012 is the first overall action plan for the cycle conditions in the city. More cyclists, safety, speed, comfort are some of the subjects in focus. Eco-metropolis 2007: Has 4 themes and 13 measurable goals. One of the themes is Copenhagen as the World’s Best City for Cyclists. Especially important for transport is the objective saying “50 % of all people going to work or education in Copenhagen will go by bike”. CopenhagenClimate Plan 2009 contains 15 initiatives for transport and the goal is to reduce CO2-emissions from transport by 10 % from 2005 to 2015. The lighthouse initiative is electric and hydrogen cars running on wind energy. Municipal Strategy 2009: The overall objective for the modal split in Copenhagen is that for all trips ”on wheels” at least 1/3 must be by public transport, at least 1/3 by cycle and less than 1/3 by car. The key efforts of the plans for transport are The City of Cyclists Improved public transport Traffic calming and parking restrictions Environmental efforts like low emission zones, possible congestion charging and environmentally friendly vehicles The City of Cyclists The City of Copenhagen has set itself the overall goal to be the world’s best city for cyclists, and since 2007 this has set the framework for measures in the cyclist area.
    [Show full text]