DOCSLIB.ORG

Bithynia Eyaleti Valileri (Prosopografik Bir Inceleme)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bithynia Eyaleti Valileri (Prosopografik Bir Inceleme) T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH (ESKİÇAĞ TARİHİ) ANABİLİM DALI ROMA PRINCIPATUS DÖNEMİ (M.Ö. 27-M.S. 284) BITHYNIA EYALETİ VALİLERİ (PROSOPOGRAFİK BİR İNCELEME) Doktora Tezi Kamil DOĞANCI Ankara-2007 T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH (ESKİÇAĞ TARİHİ) ANABİLİM DALI ROMA PRINCIPATUS DÖNEMİ (M.Ö. 27-M.S. 284) BITHYNIA EYALETİ VALİLERİ (PROSOPOGRAFİK BİR İNCELEME) Doktora Tezi Kamil DOĞANCI Tez Danışmanı Prof. Dr. Ömer ÇAPAR Ankara-2007 İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER……………………………………………………………...……….I ÖNSÖZ…………………………………………………..……………………........VI GİRİŞ………………………………………...………………………………..……..1 1. BÖLÜM KAYNAKLARIN TANITIMI……………………………...……..………..……..18 1.1. Edebi Kaynaklar………………………..…………………………...…..18 1.2. Nümizmatik Kaynaklar…………………………………………………37 1.3. Epigrafik Kaynaklar………..…………………………………..……….40 2. BÖLÜM ROMA PROVINCIA SİSTEMİ VE EYALETLERDEKİ ROMALI YÖNETİCİLER........................................................................................................43 2.1. Roma Provincia (Eyalet) Sistemi……………….………..……………..43 2.1.1.Provincia Terimi…………..…………….….………………….........43 2.1.2. Cumhuriyet Döneminde Roma Provincia Sisteminin Gelişimi.……48 2.1.3. Augustus Döneminde Provincia Sisteminin Reorganizasyonu……..50 2.1.4. Augustus Dönemi Sonrasında Provincia Sistemindeki Değişiklikler…………………………………………………………54 2.2. Eyaletlerdeki Romalı Yöneticiler……….……….………………..……58 2.2.1. Eyalet Valileri………………………………………………………58 2.2.2. Vali Yardımcıları……………………………………………..…….64 3. BÖLÜM ROMA DÖNEMİNDE BITHYNIA EYALETİNİN İDARİ YAPISI…………...69 3.1. Nicomedes IV’in Krallığını Vasiyetle Roma’ya Bırakması Sonrasındaki Gelişmeler...……………………………..…………….…...…69 3.2. Lex Pompeia ve Bithynia Eyaletinin Kuruluşu………………………..71 3.3. Eyaletin İsmi Üzerindeki Tartışmalar………………………………....75 3.4. Lex Pompeia’da Yapılan Değişiklikler ve Eyaletin Yönetimi Sorunu…………………………………………………..………………79 3.5. Eyaletin Sınırları………………………………………….…..……..…..90 3.6. Eyalet Meclisi (κοίνον τών έν Βείθυνία Ελλήνών)……....………….…92 3.7. Bithynia Eyaletinde Roma’nın Uyguladığı Mali, Askeri ve Adli Politikalar……………………………………………………………..….97 3.7.1. Mali Uygulamalar………………………………………..….97 3.7.2. Askeri Politikalar………………………………………..…100 3.7.3. Adli Uygulamalar (Bithynia Conventus’u ‘Dioceses’)...…104 4. BÖLÜM CIVITATES PROVINCIAE BITHYNIAE…………………………………….107 4.1. Antik Kaynaklara Göre Bithynia’daki Civitates’ler………………..107 4.2. Eyalet Valisinin Tam Denetimi Altındaki Civitates’ler…………......116 4.2.1. Nicomedia…………………………………………………………116 4.2.2. Nicaea…………………………………………………………..…122 4.2.3. Prusa …………….………………………………………………...130 4.2.4. Prusias ad Mare (Cius)………………………………………….…135 4.2.5. Bithynium (Claudiopolis)…………………………………………139 4.2.6. Prusias ad Hypium…………………………………………...……141 4.2.7. Iuliopolis………………………………………………………..…144 4.2.8. Cretia Flaviopolis………………………………………………….145 4.2.9. Caesarea-Germanicopolis…………………………………………146 4.3. Bithynia Eyaletindeki Coloniae Statüsündeki Kentler...…………….149 4.3.1. Myrleia (Apamea)…………………………………………………149 4.4. Bithynia’daki Bağımsız Kentler (Civitas Libera)………………….…152 4.4.1. Chalcedon…………………………………………………………153 II 4.4.2. Byzantium…………………………………………………………157 5. BÖLÜM ROMA PRINCIPATUS DÖNEMİNDE BITHYNIA EYALETİ VALİLERİNE PROSOPOGRAFİK BAKIŞ (M.Ö. 27-M.S. 284)....………………………...….158 5.1. PROCONSUL UNVANLI VALİLER (M.Ö. 27-M.S. 165 ?)……..…161 5.1.1. Prosopografik Bölüm…………………………………………….161 5.1.1.1. Thorius Flaccus (M.Ö. 29/28 veya 28/27)………………….…161 5.1.1.2. Appius Claudius Pulcher (M.Ö. ca. 27/26)…………….……….163 5.1.1.3. C. Marcius Censorinus (M.Ö. ca. 14/13)……………………….167 5.1.1.4. L. Licinius …? (M.S. ca. 11/12)………………………….…….169 5.1.1.5. M. Ota[cilius Crassus ?] (Augustus Dönemi)…………………170 5.1.1.6. M. Granius Marcellus (M.S. 14–15)……………………………171 5.1.1.7. P. Vitellius (M.S. 17–18)………………………………………175 5.1.1.8. L. Mindius Pollio (M.S. ca. 41–47 ?)……….………….………179 5.1.1.9. L. Dunius Severus (M.S. 42/43 ?)…………...…………………182 5.1.1.10. L. Mindius Balbus (M.S. ca. 43-47)……………….…...……183 5.1.1.11. C. Cadius Rufus (M.S. 47-48)……………………….….……184 5.1.1.12. P. Pasidienus Firmus (M.S. 48/49 ve 49/50)…………….......188 5.1.1.13. Attius Laco (M.S. 54–55) (?)……………………………...…191 5.1.1.14. M. Tarquitius Priscus (M.S. 59–60 ?)………………………....194 5.1.1.15. T. Petronius Niger (?) (M.S. 61/62 ?)………...………...……197 5.1.1.16. L. Venuleius (?) Montanus (M.S. ca. 63) …………………..…199 5.1.1.17. M. Plancius Varus (M.S. 70-71 ? ve 71–72 ?)……………….200 5.1.1.18. M. Maecius Rufus (M.S. 72-73)………………………..……208 5.1.1.19. M. Salvidienus Proculus (M.S. ca. 75–76)……………………210 5.1.1.20. M. Salvidienus Asprenas (M.S. ca. 76–77)…………………...212 5.1.1.21. Velius Paulus (M.S. ca. 79–80)…………………………….…214 5.1.1.22. L. Minicius Rufus (M.S. 81–82 ?)…………………...………215 5.1.1.23. A. Bucius Lappius Maximus (M.S. 82–83 ?)………………....217 5.1.1.24. Ti. Iulius Ti. F. Celsus Polemaeanus (M.S. ca. 83–84)………219 III 5.1.1.25. L. Iulius Marinus (M.S. 88–89 veya 89–90)…………………220 5.1.1.26. Tullius Iustus (M.S. 96–97 ?)…………………………………221 5.1.1.27. C. Iulius Bassus (M.S. 98-99? veya M.S. 101/102?)……...….222 5.1.1.28. Varenus Rufus (M.S. 105–106)……………………………….226 5.1.1.29. Ancius Maximus (M.S. 108-109’dan önce)……………….…230 5.1.1.30. P. Servilius Calvus (M.S. 108–109)……………………..……231 5.1.1.31. C. Plinius Caecilius Secundus (leg. pr. pr. consulari potestat.) (M.S. ca. 109–111 veya 111-113?)…………………..………232 5.1.1.32. C. Iulius [---] Cornutus Tertullus (leg. pr. pr.) (M.S. 111? 114– 115 ?)…………………………………………...……………239 5.1.1.33. Q. Cornelius Senecio Annianus (Hadrianus dönemi)…………243 5.1.1.34. C. Iulius Severus (M.S. 135?) …………………………...……244 5.1.1.35. Q. Voconius Saxa Fidus (M.S. 142-143?)………………….…250 5.1.1.36. Adı Belirlenemiyor (M.S. 124–146)………………………..…253 5.1.1.37. L. Coelius Festus (M.S. 146–147?)…………………………...253 5.1.1.38. Adı Belirlenemiyor (M.S. ca. 156–158)………………………254 5.1.1.39. M. Roscius Murena (M.S. ca. 161–162)………………………255 5.1.1.40. Adı ve Tarihi Belirlenemiyor…………………..………….…256 5.1.1.41. Adı ve Tarihi Belirlenemiyor………………………….………256 5.1.2. Değerlendirme……………………………………………………257 5.1.2.1. Bithynia-Pontus Eyaleti Proconsul’lerinin Kronolojik Listesi…………………………………………………………..257 5.1.2.2. Pontus Bithynia Eyaleti Proconsul’lerinin Coğrafi Kökenleri………………...…………………………..…………260 5.2. LEGATI AUGUSTI PRO PRAETORE UNVANLI VALİLER (M.S. 165-284)……………………………………………………..…………262 5.2.1. Prosopografik Bölüm…………………………………………….262 5.2.1.1. L. Hedius Lollianus Avitus (M.S. ca. 162/163-164/165 veya 165/166) ……………………………….………………………..262 IV 5.2.1.2. L. Albinus Saturninus (M.S. ca. 180)………………...………..265 5.2.1.3. [---] Severus (M.S. ca. 183/184-185/186)……………………...267 5.2.1.4. M. Didius Severus lulianus (M.S. ca. 186/187-187/188)……..268 5.2.1.5. L. Fabius Cilo Septimus Catinius Acilianus Lepidus Fulcinianus (M.S. ca. 194)……………………………………………..……272 5.2.1.6. Q. Tieneius Sacerdos (M.S. ca. 197/198-198/199 )………..…...277 5.2.1.7. M. Claudius Demetrius (M.S. ca. 199-202 veya 205-211)……279 5.2.1.8. Ti. Claudius Callippianus Italicus (M.S. ca. 202–205)………..282 5.2.1.9. Aelius Antipater (Severus zamanında) (M.S. ca. 205-211)……283 5.2.1.10. C. Cladius Attalus Paterculianus (M.S. 193-214)………...….285 5.2.1.11. Caecilius Aristo (M.S. 215/216 ?–217/218)…………..………286 5.2.1.12. Claudius Aelius Pollio ? (M.S. 218)…………………….……287 5.2.1.13. L. Egnatius Victor Lollianus (M.S. ca. 227-230)……………289 5.2.1.14. C. Furius Sabinus Aquila Timesitheus (M.S. ca. 235-236)….293 5.2.1.15. M. Aurelius Artemidorus (M.S. ca. 245/246–247/248)….…..296 5.2.1.16. Velleius Macrinus ( ca 269)……………………………...……297 5.2.1.17. M. Clodius Pupienus Maximus (?)……….………………...…299 5.2.1.20. D. Caelius Calvinus Balbinus (?)……………………………...300 5.2.2. Değerlendirme……………………………………………………303 5.2.2.1. Bithynia-Pontus Eyaletindeki Legati Augusti Pro Praetore Unvanlı Valilerin Kronolojik Listesi…………...…..……..……303 5.2.2.2. Bithynia-Pontus Eyaletindeki Legati Augusti Pro Praetore Unvanlı Valilerin Coğrafi Kökenleri…………………………...306 SONUÇ………………………………………………………….………………...308 KISALTMALAR VE KAYNAKÇA………………..……………....…………...313 ÖZET…………………………………………………………………………...…362 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………..……...…363 V ÖNSÖZ Lisans öğrenimimden sonra Uludağ Üniversitesi Tarih Bölüm başkanı Prof. Dr. Yusuf Oğuzoğlu’nun teşvikleriyle Eskiçağ Tarihi alanında Yüksek Lisans yapmaya karar verdim. Yüksek Lisans tez konum “Nümizmatik ve Epigrafik Kaynakların Işığında Roma İmparatorluk Dönemi’nde Bithynia’nın Sosyo- Ekonomik Durumu (Augustus’tan Diocletianus’a kadar)” idi. Yüksek Lisans tezimi hazırlarken Prof. Dr. Ömer Çapar’ın büyük desteğini gördüm. Doktora tez konumu da Prof. Dr. Ömer Çapar’ın önerisiyle seçtim. Başlangıçta Bithynia eyaletindeki tüm kamu görevlilerini ele almayı plandım. Ancak kaynak taramasına başladığım zaman konunun çok geniş olduğunun farkına vardım. Bu nedenle tez danışmanım sayın Prof. Dr. Ömer Çapar’ın da onayıyla tez konusunu Bithynia eyaleti valileriyle sınırlandırdık. Tezimin prosopografik bir çalışma olmasından dolayı çok geniş bir kaynak taraması yapmak zorunda kaldım. Sadece Bithynia eyaleti yazıtlarını değil hemen hemen tüm Roma dönemi yazıtlarını taradım. Özellikle cursus honorum yazıtları tezim açısından önemli bilgiler sağladı. Yine aynı şekilde nümizmatik malzemeleri de gözden geçirdim. Son yıllardaki teknolojik gelişmeler sonucunda bilimsel araştırmalarda internet kullanımı neredeyse zorunlu hale gelmiştir. Özellikle eskiçağ tarihi araştırmaları açısından internet ortamı birçok nümizmatik, epigrafik ve edebi kaynağa çok rahat ulaşmamı sağladı. Ayrıca yine üniversitemizin üye olduğu JSTOR adlı periyodik sayesinde Journal of Roman Studies, Journal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Crayfishes (Crustacea: Decapoda)
    Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Crayfishes (Crustacea: Decapoda) HORTON H, HOBBS, JR. m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 164 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti- tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These pub- lications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, and other interested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available. S. DILLON RIPLEY Secretary Smithsonian Institution SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 164 Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Crayfishes (Crustacea: Decapoda) Horton H.
    [Show full text]
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Valerius Maximus on Vice: a Commentary of Facta Et Dicta
    Valerius Maximus on Vice: A Commentary on Facta et Dicta Memorabilia 9.1-11 Jeffrey Murray University of Cape Town Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the School of Languages and Literatures University of Cape Town June 2016 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Abstract The Facta et Dicta Memorabilia of Valerius Maximus, written during the formative stages of the Roman imperial system, survives as a near unique instance of an entire work composed in the genre of Latin exemplary literature. By providing the first detailed historical and historiographical commentary on Book 9 of this prose text – a section of the work dealing principally with vice and immorality – this thesis examines how an author employs material predominantly from the earlier, Republican, period in order to validate the value system which the Romans believed was the basis of their world domination and to justify the reign of the Julio-Claudian family. By detailed analysis of the sources of Valerius’ material, of the way he transforms it within his chosen genre, and of how he frames his exempla, this thesis illuminates the contribution of an often overlooked author to the historiography of the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 Institute of Archaeology Belgrade, Serbia 24. LIMES CONGRESS Serbia 02-09 September 2018 Belgrade - Viminacium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER Institute of Archaeology Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade http://www.ai.ac.rs [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637-191 EDITOR IN CHIEF Miomir Korać Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade EDITORS Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade Nemanja Mrđić Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade GRAPHIC DESIGN Nemanja Mrđić PRINTED BY DigitalArt Beograd PRINTED IN 500 copies ISBN 979-86-6439-039-2 4 CONGRESS COMMITTEES Scientific committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology Miroslav Vujović, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Stefan Pop-Lazić, Institute of Archaeology Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology International Advisory Committee David Breeze, Durham University, Historic Scotland Rebecca Jones, Historic Environment Scotland Andreas Thiel, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Esslingen Nigel Mills, Heritage Consultant, Interpretation, Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development Sebastian Sommer, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Lydmil Vagalinski, National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Mirjana Sanader, Odsjek za arheologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Organization committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]
  • Plinius Senior Naturalis Historia Liber V
    PLINIUS SENIOR NATURALIS HISTORIA LIBER V 1 Africam Graeci Libyam appellavere et mare ante eam Libycum; Aegyptio finitur, nec alia pars terrarum pauciores recipit sinus, longe ab occidente litorum obliquo spatio. populorum eius oppidorumque nomina vel maxime sunt ineffabilia praeterquam ipsorum linguis, et alias castella ferme inhabitant. 2 Principio terrarum Mauretaniae appellantur, usque ad C. Caesarem Germanici filium regna, saevitia eius in duas divisae provincias. promunturium oceani extumum Ampelusia nominatur a Graecis. oppida fuere Lissa et Cottae ultra columnas Herculis, nunc est Tingi, quondam ab Antaeo conditum, postea a Claudio Caesare, cum coloniam faceret, appellatum Traducta Iulia. abest a Baelone oppido Baeticae proximo traiectu XXX. ab eo XXV in ora oceani colonia Augusti Iulia Constantia Zulil, regum dicioni exempta et iura in Baeticam petere iussa. ab ea XXXV colonia a Claudio Caesare facta Lixos, vel fabulosissime antiquis narrata: 3 ibi regia Antaei certamenque cum Hercule et Hesperidum horti. adfunditur autem aestuarium e mari flexuoso meatu, in quo dracones custodiae instar fuisse nunc interpretantur. amplectitur intra se insulam, quam solam e vicino tractu aliquanto excelsiore non tamen aestus maris inundant. exstat in ea et ara Herculis nec praeter oleastros aliud ex narrato illo aurifero nemore. 4 minus profecto mirentur portentosa Graeciae mendacia de his et amne Lixo prodita qui cogitent nostros nuperque paulo minus monstrifica quaedam de iisdem tradidisse, praevalidam hanc urbem maioremque Magna Carthagine, praeterea ex adverso eius sitam et prope inmenso tractu ab Tingi, quaeque alia Cornelius Nepos avidissime credidit. 5 ab Lixo XL in mediterraneo altera Augusta colonia est Babba, Iulia Campestris appellata, et tertia Banasa LXXV p., Valentia cognominata.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Anales De Literatura 28.Pdf
    ANALES DE LITERATURA ESPAÑOLA ANALES DE LITERATURA ESPAÑOLA Director Enrique RUBIO CREMADES Codirector Miguel Ángel LOZANO MARCO Secretaría académica Eva GARCÍA FERRÓN & Cristina ROS BERENGUER Secretaría técnica Alexandra GARCÍA MILÁN Consejo editorial Carmen ALEMANY BAY (Universidad de Alicante) Beatriz ARACIL VARÓN (Universidad de Alicante) Miguel Ángel AULADELL PÉREZ (Universidad de Alicante) M.ª Ángeles AYALA ARACIL (Universidad de Alicante) Textos esenciales de Rubén Darío. Jean-François BOTREL (Université Rennes 2) Helena ESTABLIER PÉREZ (Universidad de Alicante) José María FERRI COLL (Universidad de Alicante) En el centenario de su muerte Dante LIANO (Università Cattolica di Milano) Renata LONDERO (Università degli Studi di Udine) Gregorio MARTÍN (Duquesne University) Remedios MATAIX AZUAR (Universidad de Alicante) Edición de Miguel Ángel Auladell Pérez y José Carlos Rovira Ermitas PENAS VALERA (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela) Ángel L. PRIETO DE PAULA (Universidad de Alicante) en colaboración con Ferran Riesgo Monserrat RIBAO (Universidad de Vigo) Juan A. RÍOS CARRATALÁ (Universidad de Alicante) José Carlos ROVIRA SOLER (Universidad de Alicante) Diego SAGLIA (Universitá degli Studi di Parma) Marisa SOTELO VÁZQUEZ (Universidad de Barcelona) Dolores THION SORIANO-MOLLÁ (Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour) Eva VALERO JUAN (Universidad de Alicante) Comité científico Joaquín ÁlvAREZ BARRIENTOS (CSIC) Francisco Javier DÍEZ DE REVENGA (Universidad de Murcia) Ana M.ª FREIRE LÓPEZ (UNED) Salvador GARCÍA CASTAÑEDA (Ohio State University) David T. GIES (University of Virginia) José Manuel GONZÁLEZ HERRÁN (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela) Yvan LISSORGUES (Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail) Francisco José MARTÍN CABRERO (Universitá di Torino) Piero MENARINI (Universitá di Bologna) César OLIVA (Universidad de Murcia) Leonardo ROMERO TOBAR (Universidad de Zaragoza) Santos SANZ VILLANUEVA (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Philip W.
    [Show full text]
  • Orígenes Y Desarrollo Del Culto De Aquiles En La
    Als meus pares, Àngel i Àngela, i germans, Anna, M.Teresa i Joan, en agraïment per la seva estimació. A l'Agustí, per tot el que hem viscut junts i viurem encara. ÍNDICE INTRODUCCIÓN …………………………………………………………………XI I. CORPUS ………………………………………………………………………3 1. ASIA MENOR PROPÓNTIDE 1.1. Bizancio …………………………………………………………………3 Fuentes literarias: 1.1.1. COD. IUST. XI, 43 (42), 6, 2; 1.1.2. CHRON. PASCH. S.A. 433; 1.1.3. CHRON. PASCH. S.A. 443; 1.1.4. HSCH. MIL. Ill. orig. Const. 16 [= FHG IV 149 F 4]; 1.1.5. Patria Const. I, 52 (B 24). TRÓADE 1.2. Cordillera de Sigeo ………………………………………………………5 Fuentes literarias: 1.2.1. AEL. V.H. 12, 3, 7; 1.2.2. AMM. XXII 8, 4; 1.2.3. [ARIST.] F 640, 4-5 Rose; 1.2.4. ARR. Anab. I 12, 1-2; 1.2.5. AUS. IV 4; 1.2.6. CASS. DIO LXXVIII 16, 7; 1.2.7. CIC. Arch. 24; 1.2.8. CRITOBULUS II 4, 1 [= FHG V 108]; 1.2.9. CRITOBULUS IV 11, 5 [= FHG V 144-145]; 1.2.10. DIOD. SIC. XVII 17, 3; 1.2.11. DIOG. LAERT. I 74; 1.2.12. EUR. Hec. 123-128; 1.2.13. EUR. Hec. 218-221; 1.2.14. EUR. Tro. 36-40; 1.2.15. HDN. IV 8, 4-5; 1.2.16. HDT. V 94-95; 1.2.17. HOM. Il. VII 81-90; 1.2.18. HOM. Od. XXIV 71-84; 1.2.19. IULIAN. Epistolae III 79 [ep. 78]; 1.2.20.
    [Show full text]
  • P. Serafimov ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS of THRACIAN TOPONYMS and HYDRONYMS
    134 P. Serafimov ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THRACIAN TOPONYMS AND HYDRONYMS Abstract This paper offers an etymological analysis of more than 60 Thracian toponyms, hydronyms and oronyms. It presents the evidence that the Slavs were the indigenous population in the region, in agreement to the testimony of Simokatta, who equated Thracians (called Getae) with the Old Slavs: «Sclavos sive Getas hoc enim nomine antiquitus appellati sunt” – “Slavs or Getae, because this is the way they were called in the antiquity”. Introduction The toponyms, hydronyms and oronyms can provide very valuable information about the inhabitants of certain lands, because every ethnic group has their own names for moun- tain, valley, lake, and village more or less different from these of the other people. Slavic Bela Gora (White mountain) corresponds to German Weiss Berg, the Greek Λέύκος Oρος and Latin Albus Mons. Judging by these differences and peculiarities we can determine the ethnic affiliation of people who lived a long time ago in a certain geographical area. In this paper the attention is given to the Old Thracian lands: from the Carpathian Mountains to Asia Minor and from Black Sea till Dardania (Serbia). But I have to clarify that these regions do not represent the totality of the Thracian domain, in reality it continued to the Hercynian forest (Schwarzwald in Germany), Map 1, where according to Strabo the country of the Getae began [1], VII-2-III-1. Facts and discussion The terms for different types of settlements in the Thracian lands were: DABA (DAVA), PARA (PHARA), BRIA, DIZA, MIDNE, OSS (VIS), and DAMA.
    [Show full text]