DOCSLIB.ORG

San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Proposed Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Proposed Final Final Environmental Impact Report San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Prepared by: The City of El Cerrito With Assistance from: MIG, Inc. August 2014 State Clearinghouse #2014042025 San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Final EIR City of El Cerrito Contents August 26, 2014 Page i CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Relationship Between the Draft EIR and Final EIR .................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Description Summary ...................................................................................1-2 1.3 Adequacy of Final EIR ..............................................................................................1-3 2. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR ......................................................2-1 2.1 List of Draft EIR Commenters ..................................................................................2-1 2.2 Master Response Regarding Potential Use of Side Streets ..................................... 2-3 2.3 Responses to July 9, 2014 Public Comment Meeting Comments on the Draft EIR ................................................................................................................2-5 2.4 Responses to Written Comments Received During the Draft EIR Public Review Period .....................................................................................................2-15 3. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR .....................................................................................3-1 T:\1756-04\FEIR\F-contents (1756-04).doc San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Final EIR City of El Cerrito Contents August 26, 2014 Page ii T:\1756-04\FEIR\F-contents (1756-04).doc San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Final EIR City of El Cerrito 1. Introduction August 26, 2014 Page 1-1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DRAFT EIR AND FINAL EIR The Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the proposed San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan has been prepared by the City of El Cerrito (City), the Lead Agency,1 in keeping with State environmental documentation requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has prepared the Final EIR pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, including sections 15086 (Consultation Concerning Draft EIR), 15088 (Evaluation of and Responses to Comments), and 15132 (Contents of Final Environmental Impact Report). In conformance with these guidelines, the Final EIR consists of the following two volumes: (1) the Draft EIR, which was circulated for a 45-day State agency and public review and comment period beginning on June 3, 2014; and (2) this Final EIR document, which includes a list of all commenters on the Draft EIR during the Draft EIR public review period; speaker comments from the July 9, 2014 Public Comment Meeting on the Draft EIR; verbatim versions of all written communications (letters) received during the Draft EIR review period; the responses of the EIR authors to all environmental points raised during the public meeting and in the written communications; and associated revisions to the Draft EIR. None of the revisions to the Draft EIR represents a substantial increase in the severity of an identified significant impact or the identification of a new significant impact, mitigation, or alternative considerably different from those already considered in preparing the Draft EIR. Both volumes of the Final EIR are available for public review at El Cerrito City Hall, 10890 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530. Business hours are: Monday and Wednesday, 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM; Tuesday and Thursday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM; and alternate Fridays, 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM. The Final EIR and all documents referenced in the Final EIR and Draft EIR are available for review at the City of El Cerrito website at: www.el-cerrito.org/SPASP The responses to comments included in this document are correlated to the public meeting and letter comments by code numbers. Code numbers for comment letters are posted in the right hand margin of each comment letter. 1The Specific Plan area is located within both the City of El Cerrito and the City of Richmond. By mutual agreement of both jurisdictions, the City of El Cerrito is acting as the Lead Agency for this EIR, which has been prepared pursuant to all relevant sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). T:\1756-04\FEIR\F-1 (1756-04).doc San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Final EIR City of El Cerrito 1. Introduction August 26, 2014 Page 1-2 Certification of this Final EIR by the El Cerrito City Council must occur prior to approval of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY This project description summary should not be relied upon for a thorough understanding of the details of the project, its individual impacts, and related mitigation needs. Please refer to Draft EIR chapter 3 for a complete description of the project, Draft EIR chapters 4 through 17 for a complete description of identified environmental impacts and associated mitigation measures, and Draft EIR chapter 20 for an evaluation of alternatives to the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan ("project") represents a collaborative planning effort between the cities of El Cerrito and Richmond to identify a shared vision for the future of San Pablo Avenue, identify improvement needs, and adopt implementing regulations that can be applied consistently in the Plan area. A major goal of the planning effort is to achieve a coordinated, cohesive environment and character in the Plan area through (1) a Form-Based Code (FBC); (2) multi- modal transportation goals and policies, recommended streetscape design improvements, and design standards as part of the Complete Streets Plan; and (3) infrastructure improvements. 1.2.1 Form-Based Code The Specific Plan Form-Based Code (FBC) supports the community vision of a vibrant, walkable, sustainable, and transit-oriented corridor that respects surrounding neighborhoods. As discussed in chapter 3 (Project Description) of this EIR, the FBC is organized by Transect Zones within a framework of Downtown, Midtown, and Uptown areas. The Transect Zones regulate the building heights, parking requirements, and land uses for new development in the El Cerrito portion of the Plan area. The zones are defined primarily by walking distance to the BART stations. For the Richmond parcels in the Plan area, the Specific Plan defers to the Richmond Livable Corridors Form-Based Code. Land use types would be determined by the City of Richmond General Plan designations. 1.2.2 Complete Streets Plan The Complete Streets Plan provides direction for the redesign and development of the street right-of-way (ROW) in the Plan area, such as travel lanes, intersections, bike lanes, cycletracks, crosswalks, and medians. The Plan also provides guidance for the pedestrian realm of the ROW. The Complete Streets Plan aims to create a streetscape environment that balances the needs of all users and encourages “mode shift” to increase the percentage of pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. 1.2.3 Infrastructure Systems The Specific Plan (especially the Infrastructure Systems chapter) includes infrastructure goals and policies, and recommends feasible improvements to infrastructure systems to support the Plan objectives. The systems evaluated in the plan include water, wastewater, storm drainage, and dry utilities (e.g., gas, electric, cable). T:\1756-04\FEIR\F-1 (1756-04).doc San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Final EIR City of El Cerrito 1. Introduction August 26, 2014 Page 1-3 1.2.4 Development Capacity Assumptions The Plan area development capacity assumptions used for the impact analyses in this program EIR are first based on projections provided by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for the Plan area, then on entitled and planned projects in the City of El Cerrito and the City of Richmond, and projections for the construction of projects consistent with the Form- Based Code development standards. For the purpose of this EIR, ABAG Plan Bay Area growth projections were applied to the new development standards, including on-site parking, site layout and height parameters, to assume a realistic growth projection for the Specific Plan area. These design standards were developed to be consistent with the goals of Plan Bay Area: climate protection, adequate housing, healthy and safe communities, open space and agricultural preservation, equitable access, economic vitality, and transportation system effectiveness, but incorporate locally refined data more telling of the development feasibility of the Specific Plan than would be possible on a regional planning level (also see EIR chapter 14, Population and Housing). No site-specific, individual development proposals would be approved as part of the Specific Plan EIR certification process; any such individual project would be subject to its own CEQA review, including evaluation against the Specific Plan EIR. 1.2.5 Required Approvals Implementation of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan for the parcels within each City’s respective jurisdiction would require, but not be limited to, the following discretionary approvals by the City of El Cerrito and the City of Richmond: . Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report . Adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program . Adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan for the parcels within the City of El Cerrito; adoption of the Richmond Livable Corridors Form-Based Code development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan
    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS October - December 2020
    QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS October - December 2020 Quarterly Project Status Report Oct – Dec 2020 ON-GOING PROJECTS A. PROJECTS MANAGED BY AUTHORITY 1106S2 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes – Segment 2 ....................................................................................................................... 1 5002 State Route 4: Mokelumne Bike Trail/Pedestrian Crossing ........................................................................... 3 5005 State Route 4: Balfour Road Interchange – Phase 1 ........................................................................................ 5 5007 State Route 239 ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 6001 Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements: State Route 4 Widening – Phase 3 .............. 9 6002/6004 State Route 242/Clayton Road Ramps ................................................................................................................. 11 6006 State Route 4 Operational Improvements: Interstate 680 to Bailey Road ................................................ 13 7002 Interstate 80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Improvements .................................................................. 15 7003 Interstate 80/Central Avenue Interchange Improvements ............................................................................. 17 8001 Interstate 680 HOV Completion and Express Lanes .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bart Schedule El Cerrito Plaza to Sfo
    Bart Schedule El Cerrito Plaza To Sfo Reviewable Andrus usually presetting some disablement or attune kindheartedly. Wizardly and selfsame Jehu never financiers his bikinis! Unclassifiable and sphinxlike Seth never prerecord yet when George dinge his Chichewa. However the push must have a bigger law enforcement presence in the BART system wardrobe at times. Mionight Union City Pacifica approx times Weekends Holidays Weekdays 6. All built initially developed, el cerrito del norte station gateway, and disinfecting and is fast, we are felony and does bart millbrae on the day. Best Ways to salvation From BART El Cerrito del Norte Station to. Find parking costs opening hours and a parking map of El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Park. The Transbay Tube over an underwater rail tunnel that carries Bay area Rapid Transit's four transbay lines under San Francisco Bay through the cities of San Francisco and Oakland in California. It makes a mine at SFO and plum is a shuttle from the Coliseum station perform the Oakland. With one is bart schedule el cerrito plaza bart follows the moment we are. TE BART System Map Hwy DDADDOOR Hwy os 4 Transportation Corridor Under. Construction schedules will research be finalized until after BART accepts a. Each of questions. Face coverings required BART now closes at 9pm Saturday and Sunday open am-9pm having daily BART updates related to coronavirus Looking cut the. Bart schedule and there was the el cerrito plaza bart schedule to sfo with housing activists, i get a high in our facilities for most of resources where there.
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Hill and Cerrito Creek – History and Future by Susan Schwartz, Friends of Five Creeks, for King Tides Walk 2020
    Albany Hill and Cerrito Creek – History and Future by Susan Schwartz, Friends of Five Creeks, for King Tides walk 2020 Geology: Albany Hill, shaggy with trees, rises gently from the south to 338 feet elevation, dropping steeply on its other three sides. It seems to stand alone on the waterfront,, but looks are a misleading. The hill is part of an “alien terrane” –Jurassic shale and sandstone – rock that formed in the age of dinosaurs and much later was scraped from the sea bottom and caught on the edge of North America as ocean floor was forced beneath the continent. Eons later, this same titanic clash of plates heaved the rock upwards as part of a range of hills trending northwest. Now called the Novato Terrane, this remnant of the age of dinosaurs includes what are now Fleming Point, Point Isabel, a smaller summit northwest of Albany Hill (all now dynamited), Brooks Island, the Potrero San Pablo of West Richmond, and the hills of the China Camp area across San Pablo Strait. Quite recently, perhaps 3 million to 1 million years ago, the continued clash of ocean and continent warped this area downward, forming a valley, while a younger range of hills, today’s Berkeley Hills, tilted upward farther east. Humans, arriving thousands of years ago, before the end of the last Ice Age, found Albany Hill and the other hills of the Novato Terrane edging a valley. The ocean shore was well to the west, near the Farallon Islands. As the distant Ice Age glaciers melted, sea level rose.
    [Show full text]
  • Ja D C M B G Ill a Rs R
    . e Dr . Park Ridg e Harrison D v r. A t M l u Morton Ave. l C lfo a r t d W . F . s y y e . Klos W . e Hill y e top Dr. W W v A d s Dr Stanton Ave. o la . n il o r i n l a l C w D z r e o n a ucero idg e C . A R M r v m D e u Mi . l ner o . Ave c B . l y. d u W R Joh ap r. e l n A c D id r. l ve. A la s w D a o e ie M an e v . p e H p Es r v t ro to T G i ll S l i Ga H rrity W ate lv y. h hg Dr. t g i . Hi e y 1 Pa w 1 bl w Pa o Vi H Pk lmer sta A ir. D ill Ave. ve. C r to d ew . p D on evi r. m at r. h G D Mckenz ic Co ller ie D R nnec Mi . r. ticu t y on Dr. t Ave. er Gilm Henders b W a D Ro r. a l A r. r airmede D l F E . t . t n r. a e e W D S e y. M v d . m M Wiswall D . r o h r u r A e ro ll . e i d t D n G s r b D 4 r a R Ri o B r.
    [Show full text]
  • El Cerrito Historical Trail
    EL CERRITO HISTORICAL TRAIL Cub Scout Pack 104 El Cerrito, California www.elcerritoscouting.org Hike Information Total Trail Length: 8.0 Miles Western Segment - Del Norte Station to EC Plaza Station: 3.8 Miles Eastern Segment - EC Plaza Station to Del Norte Station: 4.2 Miles Hike Instructions The following pages include step-by-step hiking directions, denoted by underlined text. Major points of interest are highlighted in BOLD CAPITAL LETTERS. Informational text is presented in the indented sections. There are Numbered Questions for you to answer along the way. You may write in answers next to the questions or use the optional answer sheet at the back of the booklet. Cub Scouts are encouraged to hike as much of the trail as they can, but they are not required to complete the whole 8 miles. Do your best! Older Scouts are expected to complete the entire trail in order to earn the patch. The hike is designed as a loop, starting and ending at the Del Norte BART Station, but you may jump in anywhere along the route. The trail may be hiked over multiple days; there is no time limit. If you have difficulty finding a point of interest or the answer to a question, it’s ok to skip it and move on to the next one. What you’re looking for may no longer be there. A Brief History of El Cerrito The area around present-day El Cerrito was once home to the Ohlone Indians. The first Spanish explorers, led by Pedro Fages, arrived in 1772 and set up camp alongside the “cerrito” known today as Albany Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Historic Anitas
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Ben Choi Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Melvin Willis City Manager Carlos Martinez Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS..................... 36 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Central Project Initial Study Checklist
    RICHMOND CENTRAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Public Review Draft City of Richmond April 2014 APRIL 2014 RICHMOND CENTRAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ........................................................ 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ............................................................................................ 8 I. Aesthetics .......................................................................................................... 8 II. Agricultural and Forest Resources .................................................................... 11 III. Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 13 IV. Biological Resources ......................................................................................... 23 V. Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 28 VI. Geology and Soils ............................................................................................. 34 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................... 41 VIII. Hazards ........................................................................................................... 45 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Locker Additions at San Leandro and El Cerrito Plaza Stations
    10/31/2019 https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 (Page 1 /6) GRANT APPLICATION TFCA REGIONAL FUND VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM FYE 2020 Applicant Eligibility Application packages must be submitted to the Air District BOTH electronically (online) and as a hard copy (one copy). Complete and eligible applications received after this date will be reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis until all funds have been awarded. Only complete applications will be evaluated. Please refer to the Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant Program website for complete program eligibility requirements and instructions. NOTE: This application will work best using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox browsers. PART 1. ELIGIBILITY Legal Name of Applicant Organization Bay Area Rapid Transit District Applicant or Applicant Sponsor Type Public Transit Agency *This grant is open only to public entities. Does the agency have adequate funds to cover all stages of the proposed project from commencement through completion? Yes Does the agency have funding from a non-Air District source available and commit to funding at least 10% of total Eligible https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 1/11 10/31/2019 https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 Costs ("matching funds")? Yes Is the agency in good standing with the Air District? Applicant must have met all applicable contractual requirements for any project funded by the Air District; have not failed a TFCA fiscal or performance audit in the past three years; and be in compliance with all local, state, and federal air quality regulations. Yes Project Eligibility Will the project achieve surplus emission reductions? i.e., reductions that are beyond what is required through regulations, contracts, and other legally binding obligations at the time the Air District executes the project's funding agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP Pedestrian Routes
    Table of Contents ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Plan Development and Public Participation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 2. GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Goals and Policies .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]