DOCSLIB.ORG

RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft Prepared for WETA San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority Pier 9, Suite 111 The Embarcadero San Francisco, CA 94111 Prepared by Atkins 322 Pine Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 May 2014 Draft Contents May 2014 Contents SECTION 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 I. Purpose of this Document........................................................................................ 1 II. Purpose and Need of the Project ............................................................................ 1 III. Project Background ................................................................................................... 3 IV. Scope of this Document ........................................................................................... 4 V. Impact Terminology .................................................................................................. 7 VI. Organization of this Document ............................................................................... 8 VII. Summary of Environmental Impacts ...................................................................... 8 SECTION 2. Project Description ............................................................................................ 17 I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 17 II. Project Description .................................................................................................. 20 III. Proposed Ferry Service and Ridership Potential ................................................. 29 IV. Required Permits and Coordination ...................................................................... 33 V. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Consideration ........................... 33 SECTION 3. Environmental Checklist Form ......................................................................... 35 I. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts.................................................................. 40 II. Aesthetics .................................................................................................................. 41 III. Agriculture/Forestry Resources ............................................................................. 56 IV. Air Quality ................................................................................................................. 58 V. Biological Resources ................................................................................................ 69 VI. Cultural Resources ................................................................................................... 86 VII. Geology/Soils ........................................................................................................... 95 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................. 101 IX. Hazards/Hazardous Materials.............................................................................. 107 X. Hydrology/Water Quality ..................................................................................... 114 XI. Land Use/Planning ................................................................................................ 125 XII. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................. 140 XIII. Noise ........................................................................................................................ 141 XIV. Population/Housing .............................................................................................. 155 XV. Public Services ........................................................................................................ 158 XVI. Recreation ................................................................................................................ 162 XVII. Transportation/Traffic .......................................................................................... 165 XVIII. Utilities/Service Systems ....................................................................................... 191 XIX. Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................... 195 SECTION 4. List of Preparers ............................................................................................... 198 I. Lead Agency ............................................................................................................ 198 II. Contributing Agency .............................................................................................. 198 III. EIR Consultants ..................................................................................................... 198 IV. Project Design Team ............................................................................................. 199 San Francisco Bay Area i Richmond Ferry Terminal Project Water Emergency Transportation Authority Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Contents Draft May 2014 Appendices Appendix A Air Quality Analysis Assumptions Appendix B Special-Status Species Appendix C Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Assumptions Appendix D Noise Analysis Assumptions Figures Figure 1 Project Area .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 2 Project Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 3 Ferry Terminal Layout ............................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 4 Proposed and Potential Future Parking Locations ........................................................................... 26 Figure 5 Kayak Launch Layout................................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 6 Proposed Ferry Route ............................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 7 Views of the Ferry Terminal Site ............................................................................................................ 42 Figure 8 Views of Existing and Proposed Future Parking Locations .......................................................... 43 Figure 9 Views of Kayak Launch Location .......................................................................................................... 45 Figure 10 Views from the Ferry Terminal Project Site ....................................................................................... 46 Figure 11 GHG Mitigation Option: Solar Array Carport—Viewpoint Location Map ............................. 48 Figure 12a GHG Mitigation Option: Solar Array Carport—Views 1 and 2 across the Project Site ................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 12b GHG Mitigation Option: Solar Array Carport—Views 3 and 4 across the Project Site ................................................................................................................................................................... 50 Figure 13 General Plan Land Use Designations ................................................................................................ 126 Figure 14 Zoning ......................................................................................................................................................... 128 Figure 15 Noise Monitoring Sites ........................................................................................................................... 147 Figure 16 Existing Roadway Network .................................................................................................................. 166 Figure 17 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................. 170 Figure 18 Existing [2012] No Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ................................................... 174 Figure 19 Peak Hour Project Trips ........................................................................................................................ 178 Figure 20 Existing [2012] Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes with Parking Option 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 180 Figure 21 Existing [2012] Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes with Parking Option 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 181 Figure 22 Cumulative [2035] No Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................. 184 Figure 23 Cumulative [2035] Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Volumes with Parking Option 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 185 Figure 24 Cumulative [2035] Plus Project Peak Hour
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms
    From: Terry Abrams Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:05 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re‐opening of the third lane on the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Terry L. Abrams ABRAMS CONSULTING Management Consultants www.abramsconsulting.net 1 From: Jeff Alpert Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:14 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re-opening of the third lane on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Jeffrey D.Alpert Managing Partner Milestone Trailer Leasing LLC Ph Cell 1 From: Shannon Appelcline Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:57 AM To: MTC Info Cc: Subject: Support for Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project I am writing to express my strong support for a bike lane across the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay
    Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared for California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 SSEP Contract No. P0775013 30 September 2009 Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 USA Prepared at the Request of Carl Jochums California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Submitted to Bruce Joab, SSEP Coordinator and Contract Manager Office of Spill Prevention and Response CA Department of Fish and Game 1700 K Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone 916-322-7561 SSEP Contract No. PO775013 Note: This study was conducted in collaboration with Applied Science Associates (ASA), Inc., of South Kingston, RI, under SSEP Contract No. PO775010. ASA submitted a separate Final Report entitled Transport and Impacts of Oil Spills in San Francisco Bay – Implications for Response. i Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program Environmental Impact Report
    Executive Summary Final Program Environmental Impact Report Expansion of Ferry Transit Service in the San Francisco Bay Area Prepared by: URS Corporation June 2003 Prepared for: Executive Summary ES.1 INTRODUCTION This document is a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) addressing the San Francisco Water Transit Authority’s (WTA) Proposed Project to implement expanded ferry service in the Bay Area. The WTA began operation as a new regional agency in 2000, with the directive of evaluating options to improve and expand Bay Area ferry service and to report back to the California Legislature with a recommended plan of action. As a result, the preparation of WTA’s Implementation and Operations Plan (IOP) initiated a wide range of studies, consultation, and public outreach that provided input to the decision-making process of developing the plan. From August 2002 through January 2003, the WTA circulated a Draft Program EIR for public review and comment. That EIR did not identify a proposed project or preferred alternative; rather, it addressed a range of alternatives for expanding ferry service in the Bay Area. In March 2003, the WTA recirculated the Draft EIR in order to include analysis of the IOP Alternative, which is now identified as the Proposed Project, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. ES.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES/NEED ES.2.1 Purpose and Objectives The primary purpose of the WTA system IOP is to increase Bay Area regional mobility and transportation options by providing new and expanded water transit services and related ground transportation terminal access in the Bay Area. ES.2.2 Need The Bay Area is home to a highly diverse population and historically strong economy that is served by a complex transportation network.
    [Show full text]
  • City of San Pablo Affordable Housing Strategy
    CITY OF SAN PABLO AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGY Prepared for: City of San Pablo November 9, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5 Effects of COVID-19 on Housing Affordability ..................................................................................... 5 Process for Developing the AHS .......................................................................................................... 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 8 Housing Supply ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Existing Housing Affordability Needs ............................................................................................... 15 Existing Resources, Policies, and Programs .................................................................................... 21 RESIDENTIAL MARKET CONDITIONS IN SAN PABLO ...................................................................... 27 Residential Market Supply and Trends ............................................................................................ 27 Opportunities and Constraints for Development ............................................................................ 34 OVERVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans Day Aboard the SS Red Oak Victory
    Veterans Day Aboard the SS Red Oak Victory Hundreds packed the partly restored World War II cargo ship in Richmond Friday to honor and celebrate veterans. By Soren Hemmila Veterans Day aboard the SS Red Oak Victory ship Supervisor John Gioia, with Mariam Sauer, an original Rosie the Riveter, help re-christen SS Red Oak Victory ship in Richmond, Veterans Day, Nov. 11, 2011. A large-than-expected crowd attended a Veterans Day event aboard the SS Red Oak Victory in Richmond Friday. The Chevron-sponsored gathering honored those who served abroad in America’s armed services as well as those who supported the war effort at home. With the threat of rain, the ceremony was moved inside the Red Oak. Hundreds packed into the hull of the cargo vessel to listen to stories of Richmond during the war years. An original "Rosie the Riveter" was on hand to help re-christen the Kaiser-built vessel. Richmond native Mariam Sauer, along with Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia and Richmond Vice Mayor Tom Butt, smashed a champagne bottle to reenact the 1944 launch of the munitions carrier. The ship recently underwent extensive repairs in dry dock and received a fresh coat of paint. According to the Richmond Museum of History, the Red Oak is the Victory ship from the Richmond shipyard that is being restored. Russ Yarrow of Chevron detailed the role the Richmond refinery played during World War II. The refinery won numerous production and development awards during the war. It developed special submarine lubricants and produced 100 octane aviation fuel necessary for America’s war effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • About WETA Present Future a Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service
    About WETA Maintenance Facility will consolidate Central and South Bay fleet operations, include a fueling facility with emergency fuel The San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation storage capacity, and provide an alternative EOC location, Authority (WETA) is a regional public transit agency tasked with thereby significantly expanding WETA’s emergency response operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco and recovery capabilities. Bay, and is responsible for coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. Future Present WETA is planning for a system that seamlessly connects cities in the greater Bay Area with San Francisco, using Today, WETA operates daily passenger ferry service to the fast, environmentally responsible vessels, with wait times cities of Alameda, Oakland, San Francisco, Vallejo, and South of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. WETA’s San Francisco, carr4$)"(*- /#)тѵр million passengers 2035 vision would expand service throughout the Bay Area, annually under the San Francisco Bay Ferry brand. Over the operating 12 services at 16 terminals with a fleet of 44 vessels. last five years, SF Bay Ferry ridership has grown чф percent. In the near term, WETA will launch a Richmond/San Francisco route (201ш) and new service to Treasure Island. Other By the Numbers terminal sites such as Seaplane Lagoon in Alameda, Berkeley, Mission Bay, Redwood City, the South Bay, and the Carquinez *- /#)ǔǹǒ --$ ./-).+*-/0+ Strait are on the not-too-distant horizon. ($''$*)-$ -. /*ǗǕǑ$& .-*.. 0. 4 --4 /# 4 #4ǹ 1 -44 -ǹ A Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service --4-$ -.#$+ 1 )! --$ . Vallejo #.$)- . /*!' / /2 )ǓǑǒǘ CARQUINEZ STRAIT Ǚǖʞ.$) ǓǑǒǓǹ )ǓǑǓǑǹ Hercules WETA Expansion Targets Richmond Funded Traveling by ferry has become increasingly more popular in • Richmond Berkeley the Bay Area, as the economy continues to improve and the • Treasure Island Partially Funded Pier 41 Treasure Island population grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Weta.Sanfranciscobayferry.Com
    Members of the Board SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY James Wunderman, Chair BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Jessica Alba Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr. VIDEOCONFERENCE Monique Moyer Join WETA BOD Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89718217408 Meeting ID: 897 1821 7408 Password: 33779 Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) The full agenda packet is available for download at weta.sanfranciscobayferry.com AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE FY 2022-2024 TITLE VI PROGRAM Action 4. PRELIMINARY FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 OPERATING AND CAPITAL Information BUDGETS 5. WETA BUSINESS PLAN CONCEPT AND ORGANIZATION Information ADJOURNMENT All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board of Directors. Staff recommendations are subject to action and change by the Board of Directors. CHANGES RELATED TO COVID-19 Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, effective immediately and until further notice, meetings will be conducted through virtual participation to promote social distancing and reduce the chance of COVID-19 transmission. PUBLIC COMMENTS As this is a special meeting of the Board, public comments are limited to the listed agenda items. If you know in advance that you would like to make a public comment during the videoconference, please email [email protected] with your name and item number you would like to provide comment on no later than 15 Water Emergency Transportation Authority May 20, 2021 Meeting of the Board of Directors minutes after the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan
    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]