Western Hem Sphere Travel in T at Ve N the Land and Sea Env Ronments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Hem Sphere Travel in T at Ve N the Land and Sea Env Ronments Western Hemsphere Travel Intatve n the Land and Sea Envronments: Fnal Programmatc Envronmental Assessment Table of Contents Executve Summary ........................................................................ .1 List of Tables Acronyms and Abbrevatons .......................................................... 5 Clarifications and Updates ............................................................... 7 Table 1 The top 39 land ports by volume account for 95% of the total volume of land border crossngs ............... 20 1 Introducton ............................................................................... 9 Table 2 The measured processng tme (No-Acton) and 2 Purpose and Need .................................................................... 11 estmated processng tme for the acton alternatves.. 41 3 The Alternatves ...................................................................... 15 Table 3 Ar mpacts by mplementaton stage and border (Northern/Southern).................................................... 47 4 Establshng the Baselne ........................................................ 19 Table 4 Nose mpacts by mplementaton stage and border 5 Methods and Drvers ............................................................... 33 (Northern/Southern).................................................... 54 6 Envronmental Resources of Concern ..................................... 47 7 Envronmental Resources Not Impacted ................................. 59 List of Figures 8 Sea Ports-of-Entry and Recreatonal Craft ............................. 65 Fgure 1 Map of the Northern Border LPOEs rank-ordered by average border crossngs per day ................................ 21 9 Transboundary Impacts ........................................................... 69 Fgure 2 Map of the Southern Border LPOEs rank-ordered by 10 Cumulatve Impacts Summary ................................................ 71 average border crossngs per day ................................ 22 11 Conclusons ............................................................................. 73 Fgure 3 Noncommercal border crossngs by year for the Northern and Southern Borders .................................. 25 12 Publc Involvement ................................................................. 75 Fgure 4 Transportaton method of entry at the Canadan border 13 References ............................................................................... 77 n 2005 ........................................................................ 25 14 Lst of Preparers ...................................................................... 83 Fgure 5 The composton of travelers along the Northern and Southern Borders in 2004 (includes truck traffic) ....... 26 Appendices Fgure 6 Transportaton method of entry at the Mexcan border n 2005 ........................................................................ 27 A. Trusted Traveler Programs ...................................................... 85 Fgure 7 Average daytme wat tmes for hgh-volume LPOEs B. Levels of Impact by Resource Area ......................................... 85 on the Canadan border from 2003 to 2006 ................ 29 C. Estmatng the WHTI-Affected Travelers’ Crossngs Fgure 8 Average daytme wat tmes for hgh-volume LPOEs into the United States .............................................................. 86 on the Mexcan border from 2003 to 2006.................. 29 D. Publc Involvement Materals ................................................. 88 Fgure 9 The percentage of people below poverty level n 2005 E. Federally Recognzed Trbes on the Border ............................ 94 (for whom poverty status s determned) .................... 31 Fgure 10 Installaton of RFID technology at a typcal LPOE .... 35 WHTI Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment v Fgure 11 Causal factors that affect vehcle wat tme n Prmary and Secondary Inspectons at LPOEs ......................... 38 Fgure 12 Inbound land-border crossngs from 2000 to 2006 ..... 39 Figure 13 Average processing times and traffic volume at selected LPOEs for U.S. citizens and visitors .......................... 40 Fgure 14 The alternatves rank-ordered by processng tme ...... 41 Fgure 15 The relatonshp between vehcle emssons and wat tmes at LPOEs by county on the Southern Border..... 49 Fgure 16 The relatonshp between vehcle CO emssons and wat tmes at LPOEs by county on the Southern Border .......................................................... 50 Fgure 17 The relatonshp between vehcle emssons and wat tmes for LPOEs by county on the Northern Border .......................................................... 51 Fgure 18 The locatons of major sea ports-of-entry across the United States ............................................................... 65 Fgure 19 Dagram of typcal cruse-shp passenger nspecton process ........................................................................ 67 v WHTI Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Executive Summary Implementaton of the land and sea phase of the Western Hemsphere changes to technology and operatons to meet the requrements for Travel Intatve (WHTI) plan, as drected by the Intellgence Reform standardized, secure travel documents under WHTI. Specifically, and Terrorsm Preventon Act of 2004 (IRTPA), s antcpated to the PEA analyzes the potental envronmental mpacts of four alter- enhance the security of the United States (U.S.) borders, while facili- natve ways to mplement the land and sea phases of the WHTI plan tatng the movement of legtmate travel and trade across borders. and the three related stages of mplementaton actvty. The analyss The WHTI plan would require that citizens of the United States, focuses on mplementng the land phase of the WHTI plan, snce Canada, Mexco, and Bermuda use a passport or other desgnated LPOEs are the most senstve to changes n actvty n terms of alternatve document that establshes the traveler’s dentty and ct- potental envronmental mpacts. Changes to processng travelers zenship to enter the United States at ports-of-entry. Currently, a range at sea ports-of-entry would happen entrely wthn exstng buld- of different forms of identification, including oral declarations, are ngs and other nfrastructure whle cruse shps are docked, and as accepted, resulting in difficulty for border officials in detecting fraud- a result no envronmental mpacts to land or coastal areas around ulent documents, ncreased tme to assess the valdty of documents, the sea ports-of-entry are antcpated. and consequential delays in traffic passing through U.S. borders. The alternatves for mplementng WHTI at POEs are lsted below. The WHTI plan is already in place at U.S. airports. Currently, Each alternatve ncludes the exstng Trusted Traveler Programs the Department of Homeland Securty (DHS) and Customs and already in place (NEXUS, Secure Electronic Network for Travelers’ Border Protecton (CBP) are consderng how to best mplement Rapd Inspecton (SENTRI), and Free and Secure Trade (FAST)). the WHTI plan at sea ports-of-entry and at land border ports-of- The alternatves nclude a No-Action Alternative and three acton entry (LPOEs). As part of that decson-makng process, CBP alternatves: analyzed the potental envronmental mpacts of alternate ways to apply and mplement the land and sea phases of the WHTI plan. 1. Mantan the status quo (the No-Action Alternative as The Natonal Envronmental Polcy Act (NEPA) establshes how requred by NEPA); envronmental analyses should be framed. In the case of the WHTI plan, a natonal or programmatc analyss s approprate, gven the 2. Accept a lmted number of document categores for adms- natonal geographc scope of the LPOE locatons and the natonal son at a Land or Sea Port-of-Entry (POE) (Standardized applcaton of WHTI. Documents Alternative); 3. Accept standardzed documents that contan a Machne CBP conducted a Programmatc Envronmental Assessment (PEA) Readable Zone (MRZ Alternative); and to serve as the bass for the determnaton of whether the docu- ments and use of the documents for mplementaton of IRTPA wll 4. Accept standardzed documents that contan Rado have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment Frequency Identification (RFID) technology and an MRZ, such that t would requre further analyss under NEPA. The PEA for the use of RFID-enabled readers at the busest LPOEs documents a revew of the potental envronmental mpacts from and MRZ at all LPOEs (RFID Alternative). WHTI Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment 1 Executive Summary Potental envronmental mpacts would occur n varyng degrees ncome, mnorty, or Natve Amercan populatons. No potental durng the three stages of actvty assocated wth WHTI. The stages mpacts to energy, land use, waste, water, bologcal resources, of actvty are lsted below: health and safety, or hstorc propertes are antcpated for any of the acton alternatves. 1) Implementaton Stage; 2) Early Operatonal Stage; and Summary of Drivers for Environmental Impacts for the 3) Steady State Operatonal Stage: The stage that s consdered Action Alternatives: the drver for envronmental mpacts n ths analyss. • No potential for significant upgrades or substantial new To assess the potental envronmental mpacts of the WHTI plan constructon alternatves, CBP consdered the two man drvers, or aspects of mplementaton, that would cause envronmental change: con- • Potental to reduce processng tme and wat tme slghtly struction and traffic flow. Each alternative would require differing amounts of construction and result in different traffic flow rates at varous
Recommended publications
  • A Line Runs Through It PLSC Supports New 40Th Parallel Exhibit
    Photo inset above shows the brass monu- An eye-catching red line bisects two massive ment set in the exhibit’s stone bench. It is halves of a cut stone, marking the baseline set the first position posted to the beta NGS by Todd & Withrow in 1859. It runs next to a bus OPUS-DB database in Colorado. stop on Baseline Road in Boulder, Colorado. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • March • Copyright 2009 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com A LINE RUNS THROUGH It PLSC Supports New 40th Parallel Exhibit he northern Front Range of what is now Colorado was a pristine wilderness well into the 1850s, trampled only by a small number of trappers and explorers, and by the light footprints of native peoples who had inhabited the area for over a millennium. These halcyon days changed quickly with the discovery of gold in nearby Golden, resulting in thousands of settlers moving onto public domain lands that had not yet been surveyed. In 1859, the land at the mouth of Boulder Canyon was officially established as the Boulder City Town Company. It was located north of the 40th parallel in the Nebraska Territory; the land to the south of the 40th parallel at this time was in the Kansas Territory. Colorado statehood was to come 17 years later. Extending the 40th Parallel Westward The General Land Office was under pressure to extend the Baseline to the west from the 6th Principal Meridian. On June 10, 1859, U. S. Deputy Surveyors Jarret Todd and James Withrow were awarded the contract to extend the baseline to the summit of the Rockies, starting 204 miles west of the Missouri River, and making their way across the plains until arriving in Boulder City on August 31 of that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth-Satellite Geometry
    EARTH-REFERENCED AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE ANALYSIS Michael Geyer S π/2 - α - θ d h α N U Re Re θ O Michael Geyer Frederick de Wit Navigation Vertical Plane Model Peter Mercator Federico Rostagno Spherical Surface Model Surveillance Project Memorandum — June 2016 DOT-VNTSC-FAA-16-12 Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Wake Turbulence Research Office DOT Volpe Center FOREWORD This document addresses a basic function of aircraft (and other vehicle) surveillance and navi- gation systems analyses — quantifying the geometric relationship of two or more locations relative to each other and to the earth. Here, geometry means distances and angles, including their projections in a defined coordinate frame. Applications that fit well with these methods include (a) planning a vehicle’s route; (b) determining the coverage region of a radar or radio installation; and (c) calculating a vehicle’s latitude and longitude from measurements (e.g., of slant- and spherical-ranges or range differences, azimuth and elevation angles, and altitudes). The approach advocated is that the three-dimensional problems inherent in navigation/surveil- lance analyses should, to the extent possible, be re-cast as a sequence of sub-problems: . Vertical-Plane Formulation (two-dimensional (2D) problem illustrated in top right panel on cover) — Considers the vertical plane containing two problem-specific locations and the center of a spherical earth, and utilizes plane trigonometry as the primary analysis method. This formulation provides closed-form solutions. Spherical-Surface Formulation (2D problem illustrated in bottom left panel on cover) — Considers two or three problem-specific locations on the surface of a spherical earth; utilizes spherical trigonometry as the primary analysis method.
    [Show full text]
  • PLSS) – Part 1 Lorraine Manz
    The Public Land Survey System (PLSS) – Part 1 Lorraine Manz Introduction How the PLSS works The orderly network of roads and fences that divides the North Simply put, the PLSS (also referred to as the system of rectangular Dakota landscape into its familiar checkerboard of squares and surveys or rectangular survey system) divides land into 6- by rectangles (fi g. 1) is the result of a land survey system that has 6-mile square parcels called townships. Townships are subdivided been in use for more than two hundred years. into 36 sections, each a mile square and containing 640 acres or as close to that amount as possible. Figure 1. The method of survey that divides North Dakota into an orderly array of rectangular parcels like these near Northwood (bottom left) in Grand Forks County predates the U.S. Constitution. What we refer to today as the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) began with the Land Ordinance of 1785. The Revolutionary War had left the fl edgling United States deeply in debt, and with no power to levy taxes, the only feasible way for Congress to raise the millions of dollars needed to pay its creditors and put money in the treasury was through the sale of public lands. The areal extent of the public domain at that time was considerable and its disposal Figure 2. The Fifth Principal Meridian governs the surveys of all or part into private ownership would require the survey and division of of six states (shown in green). a region of more than 260,000 square miles of largely unmapped wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Topographic Maps Adapted from Guide by Boris Vasilev, Paradise Valley Community College, Phoenix, Arizona
    Reading Topographic Maps Adapted from Guide by Boris Vasilev, Paradise Valley Community College, Phoenix, Arizona Quadrangle Name ....................................................................................................................... 1 Latitude, Longitude, and UTM'S ................................................................................................. 1 Latitude & Longitude .............................................................................................................. 2 How Accurate Can Latitude and Longitude Get? .................................................................. 2 UTM Coordinates .................................................................................................................... 3 Map Scale ................................................................................................................................... 4 Contour Lines .............................................................................................................................. 4 Magnetic Declination .................................................................................................................. 6 Public Land Survey System ........................................................................................................ 6 Field Notes .................................................................................................................................. 8 Quadrangle Name The first thing to notice on a topographical map is the title. It is found in
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Life of Joseph C. Brown and the Bicentennial of the Fifth Principal Meridian
    Celebrating the Life of Joseph C. Brown And the Bicentennial of the Fifth Principal Meridian This year marks the two-hundredth anniversary of the initial surveys for the Fifth Principal Meridian network within the United States Public Land Survey System. This network serves as the basis for every property description and land title in an area covering more than two hundred and twenty five million acres of land within the states of Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota and North and South Dakota. An area representing nearly forty percent of the Louisiana Purchase. The Missouri Society of Professional Surveyors has planned two special events to celebrate this bicentenary. The initial event will be a program highlighting the history of this system. The second event will be the dedication of a memorial accentuating the accomplishments of one of its most distinguished surveyors. The first event will occur at our annual meeting the second weekend of October. We have a two day program planned that will summarize the development of this massive network and emphasize the achievements of some of the original surveyors. The first day will outline the development of the network, from its origin in Arkansas as a basis for the Military Bounty Lands, through its progression into Missouri and its intersection with the Spanish Land Grants, and continuing its expansion northward into Iowa, Minnesota and the Dakota Territory. The second day of the program will underscore the life’s work of Joseph C. Brown, the Deputy Surveyor responsible for running the Baseline and several significant lines in Missouri. Our signature event will occur the following weekend, with the dedication of a memorial to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline/40Th Parallel Memorial Survey Marker
    BASELINEBASELINE//4040TH PARALLELPARALLEL MEMORIALMEMORIAL SURVEYSURVEY MARKERMARKER BoulderBoulder,, ColoradoColorado In 1859, “the survey crew navigated scorching plains and rugged mountainous terrain, traversing a distance of 345 miles in 55 days.” Started as COB/RTD bus stop improvement project, slated for 2006. Christian Muller conceived world map and Baseline stripe idea. (Left to right: Alex May, PE; Jason Emery, PLS; Christian Muller, Artist) Location 40th Parallel Marker is adjacent to Guaranty Bank at 2460 Baseline Road (BaseMar Shopping Center), Boulder, CO. Alex May and Jason Emery considered a surveyor’s commemorative. Preliminary design by Christian. A large boulder was suggested and the design team discovered a wonderful Stone cutting, Spring 2007 specimen on City mountain property. Christian’s Epiphany: Cut & off-set rock halves Installation underway, October 2007 BudgetBudget IssuesIssues Alex proposed a public/private partnership and fundraising was discussed. ► Early commitment from Trimble got it going... Other contributors: City of Boulder, Transportation Basemar Center Boulder Arts Commission Boulder Land Consultants, Inc. ColoProperty.com® Drexel Barrell & Co Jason Emery, PLS, Boulder County Surveyor Flatirons Surveying & Engineering J.B. Guyton, PLS, President, PLSC Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado Note that bench was created from bottom of boulder. Project Design Enhancements: - Bench with marker to NGS standards - Night lighting - Donor plaque changed to two piece design Surveyor image created by Colorado artist Gaynor Nelson Inscription composed by Jason Emery, PLS Inscription In July 1859, Government surveyors,Withrow and Todd, were charged with establishing the line demarcating Nebraska Territory on the north, and Kansas Territory on the south. This line was to follow the parallel of latitude 40˚ North, also known as the “Base Line”, and was to terminate at “the summit of the Rocky Mountains”, then the easterly line of Utah Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Land Surveying in South Dakota Can Hardly Be Addressed Without Some Review of the Events Prior to the Establishment of Dakota Territory
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF LAND SURVEYS IN SOUTH DAKOTA Prepared by Robert S. Fodness, P.E., L.S. Prepared for South Dakota State Board of Technical Professions 2525 W. Main St., Suite 211 Rapid City, SD 57702 JANUARY 1994 INTRODUCTION The following historical account of Land Surveying in our state is intended to help educate the young developing surveyors, give a sense of where, when and how to aid the present practitioners in their retracements and to help non-resident registrants gain knowledge of the past in areas they may someday be asked to practice. The topic is treated in a broad sense in order to acquaint the practitioner with the beginnings of the survey systems within in our state. Time and resources do not permit expansion into more local accounts nor into the intervening types of practice that have been performed to date. It falls to each practitioner to become familiar with the history within his or her area of work. As such, we become historians, whether we retrace last year's monuments or those set over a hundred years ago. The commission wishes to thank Bob Fodness, P.E., L.S., for the research and preparation of this paper. In keeping with the scope and intent, much material had to be set aside for, perhaps, more detailed accounts in future publications. The commission would also like to thank the several authors who gave their permission to use their material. Editorial Note. Since the time when this paper was written in 1994, the name of the South Dakota State Commission of Engineering, Architectural and Land Surveying Examiners has been changed to the South Dakota Board of Technical Professions.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of International Border Crossing Projects on the U.S.-Mexicoborder
    Analysis of International Port-of-Entry Projects on the United States–Mexico Border Analysis of International Border Crossing Projects on the U.S.-Mexico Border April 2019 i Analysis of International Port-of-Entry Projects on the United States–Mexico Border Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables.............................................................................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. vi Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. Border Vision ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 The U.S.-Mexico Border ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1. Border Background Information..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Ecological Exposure Assessment
    Cover04-24-03JVM. pdf MichiganMichigan DepartmentDepartment ofof EnvironmentalEnvironmental QualityQuality RemediationRemediation andand RedevelopmentRedevelopment DivisionDivision FinalFinal (Revised)(Revised) BaselineBaseline EcologicalEcological RiskRisk AssessmentAssessment AlliedAllied Paper,Paper, Inc./PortageInc./Portage Creek/Creek/ KalamazooKalamazoo RiverRiver SuperfundSuperfund SiteSite AprilApril 2003 Michigan Department of Environmental QQualualityity Remediation and Redevelopment Division Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site – April 2003 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Remediation and Redevelopment DivisioDivisionn Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site – April 2003 Michigan Department of Environmental QQualualityity Remediation and Redevelopment Division Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site – April 2003 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Remediation and Redevelopment Division Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site – April 2003 MicMichiganhigan Department of Environmental Quality Remediation and Redevelopment Division Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site – April 2003 UNKED STATILS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [Show full text]
  • Specifications for Descriptions of Land: for Use in Land Orders, Executive Orders, Proclamations, Federal Register Documents, and Land Description Data Bases
    1 Office of Management and Budget United States Federal Geographic Data Committee Specifications for Descriptions of Land: For Use in Land Orders, Executive Orders, Proclamations, Federal Register Documents, and Land Description Data Bases United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Cadastral Survey CADASTRAL SUBCOMMITTEE REVISED 2013 2 Specifications for Descriptions of Land: For Use in Land Orders, Executive Orders, Proclamations, Federal Register Documents, and Land Description Data Bases WASHINGTON: 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR For sale by the Public Land Survey System Foundation http://www.blmsurveymanual.org/ 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior (Department) has basic responsibilities for water, fish, wildlife, mineral, land, park, and recreational resources. Indian and Territorial affairs are other major concerns of America's “Department of Natural Resources.” The Department works to assure the wisest choice in managing all of the nation’s resources so each will make its full contribution to a better United States – now and in the future. The Department manages about 500 million acres, or one-fifth, of the land in the United States. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages more than 245 million surface acres and also administers more than 700 million acres of subsurface mineral estate and in all 50 States. The BLM is the Nation’s surveyor and maintains extensive current and historical information about land ownership in the United States. Most title to land, public or private, begins with a land description established by an original cadastral survey. Security of legal title to land is the fundamental object of the cadastral surveyor’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Farmland Legal Descriptions
    Ag Decision Maker Iowa Farmland extension.iastate.edu/agdm Legal Descriptions File C2-85 The Public Land Survey System (PLSS) is the meridian. T2N R2E is the second township north system used in Iowa to identify the location of of the base line and the second range east of the specific tracts of land for legal and other purposes. meridian. It is sometimes referred to as the “rectangular survey system.” Figure 1. Reference Points of Townships (meridians and base lines) Latitudes are horizontal lines (e.g. equator) and longitudes are vertical lines running from the North Pole to the South Pole. The geographic location of farmland is based on the distance east T2N T2N T2N T2N or west of the longitudinal reference lines called R2W R1W R1E R2E “Principal Meridians” and north or south of the T1N T1N T1N T1N latitudinal lines called “Base Lines.” R2W R1W R1E R2E Base Line Every county is subdivided into townships, just like every state is subdivided into counties. Every Principal Meridian township has a specific geographic location. For example, Figure 1 is an example of how townships Legend are referenced in relationship to a meridian and T = township W = west base line. T1N R1W is the first township north R = range E = east of the base line and the first range west of the N = north Figure 2. Bureau of Land Management map depicting The specific meridian the principal meridians and baselines used for surveying (longitudinal reference line) states (shaded) in the PLSS used in Iowa is the Fifth Principal Meridian that runs north and south along the eastern edge of Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring the Survey of the Michigan Meridian
    HONORING THE SURVEY OF THE MICHIGAN MERIDIAN Submitted by Joseph Fenicle, PS On November 17, 1807 a line was described as the Western River) directly to White Rock, cutting out thousands of line of the Treaty of Detroit. This line would become the acres. The native tribes argued that they did not know and Michigan Meridian in 1815 and 200 years thereafter a understand the lines made up in the Treaty and they only dedication ceremony for a new Ohio Historical Marker understood landmarks (i.e. White Rock and the Rivers). would be held commemorating the survey and the surveyors. When Alexander Holmes, DS had the contract to survey the A 200th Anniversary celebration will also be held in October Michigan Baseline he had to turn back due to Indian hostility. to dedicate a new historical marker honoring Michigan’s two Benjamin Hough, DS was contracted to survey the sections Initial Points. along the Road between Fort Meigs and the Western Reserve also had to turn back due to Indian hostility. Ironically these The Treaty of Detroit as executed by General William Hull, two deputy surveyors would team up to survey the Michigan Governor of the Michigan Territory, was signed by the Meridian. tribes of the Ottawa, Chippewa, Wyandot and Pottwatamie. As requested by President Thomas Jefferson this treaty The War of 1812 was the Battle between the United States covered the first public land to be available in what would and the British Empire. They were trying to restrict trade become the State of Michigan in 1837. In total the Treaty and America’s desire to expand.
    [Show full text]