1 FOB Lipa.Pdf (9.519Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 FOB Lipa.Pdf (9.519Mb) PLANEACIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN LAS ÁREAS OPERATIVAS DE ECOPETROL -VENTANA LIPA, ARAUCA, ORINOQUIA, COLOMBIA- PRODUCTO 8. INFORME FINAL DE RESULTADOS JUNIO DE 2013 Convenio de cooperación No. 13-12-067-023CE PLANEACIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN LAS ÁREAS OPERATIVAS DE ECOPETROL -VENTANA LIPA, ARAUCA, ORINOQUIA, COLOMBIA- EQUIPO DE TRABAJO DE LA FOB: Juan Miguel Ruiz Ovalle, Ornitólogo Lina Marcela Ortiz Arrollave, Ictióloga Magda Catalina Quinche Cano, Herpetóloga Maira Alejandra Villanueva Rivas, Mastozoóloga Francisco Javier Mijares Santana, Botánico William Romero, Técnico de apoyo logístico Karen Elisa Pérez Albarracín, Bióloga, Coordinadora del Proyecto JUNIO DE 2013 2 Convenio de cooperación No. 13-12-067-023CE TABLA DE CONTENIDO 1. ÁREA DE ESTUDIO Y MÉTODOS .............................................................. 19 1.1 ÁREA DE ESTUDIO ................................................................................ 19 1.2 MÉTODOS ............................................................................................... 21 1.2.1 Flora ................................................................................................... 21 1.2.1.1 Ecosistema de sabana inundable ....................................................... 22 1.2.1.1.1 Raudal de la Barquereña ................................................................ 22 1.2.1.1.2 Esteros .......................................................................................... 23 1.2.1.1.3 Bajos ............................................................................................ 24 1.2.1.1.4 Bancos .......................................................................................... 25 1.2.1.1.5 Matas de monte ............................................................................. 26 1.2.1.2 Selvas del Lipa ................................................................................. 27 1.2.1.2.1 Bosque ribereño ............................................................................ 27 1.2.1.2.2 Bosque natural remanente ............................................................. 27 1.2.2 Aves ................................................................................................... 28 1.2.2.1 Apertura de redes de niebla .............................................................. 28 1.2.2.2. Recorridos libres (observaciones y vocalizaciones) ............................. 30 1.2.2.3. Análisis de datos .............................................................................. 31 1.2.2.4. Esfuerzo de muestreo ...................................................................... 31 1.2.3 Mamíferos ........................................................................................... 32 1.2.3.1 Mamíferos voladores ......................................................................... 32 1.2.3.2 Mamíferos pequeños no voladores ..................................................... 33 1.2.3.3 Mamíferos Medianos y Grandes ......................................................... 34 1.2.4 Anfibios y Reptiles ............................................................................... 35 1.2.4.1 Preservación de material ................................................................... 36 1.2.4.2 Obtención de tejidos para estudios moleculares .................................. 36 1.2.4.3 Métodos indirectos ............................................................................ 37 1.2.5 Peces ................................................................................................. 37 1.2.5.1 Artes de pesca .................................................................................. 37 1.2.5.2 Ubicación de las estaciones de muestreo ............................................ 39 1.2.5.3 Parámetros físico-químicos ................................................................ 41 1.2.5.4 Descripción de las estaciones de muestreo: Amenazas y uso actual ..... 42 2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN ................................................................... 44 2.1 Flora ...................................................................................................... 44 2.1.1 Composición florística y estructura del raudal de La Barquereña ............. 44 2.1.3 Composición florística y estructura de los esteros .................................. 47 2.1.4 Composición florística de los bajos ........................................................ 48 2.1.5 Composición florística de los bancos ..................................................... 49 2.1.6 Composición florística de las “matas de monte” ..................................... 50 2.1.2 Ecosistema Selvas del Lipa ................................................................... 53 3 Convenio de cooperación No. 13-12-067-023CE 2.1.2.1 Composición florística del bosque ribereño ........................................ 53 2.1.2.2 Composición florística del bosque natural remanente o fragmentos de la “Selva del Lipa” ............................................................................................ 57 2.1.2.3 Potreros ........................................................................................... 60 2.1.3 Georreferenciación de especies de flora objeto de conservación ............. 62 2.1.5 Consolidado de especies encontradas e identificadas en las coberturas vegetales evaluadas ..................................................................................... 63 2.1.6 Especies caducifolias en la Ventana Lipa ............................................... 74 2.2 Aves ...................................................................................................... 76 2. 2. 1 Riqueza y abundancia de aves en la sabana inundable y la selva de Lipa. ................................................................................................................... 77 2.2.2 Curva de acumulación de especies y análisis de similaridad .................... 80 2.2.3 Aspectos reproductivos de las aves ....................................................... 82 2.2.4 Especies de aves para ampliación de distribución ................................. 86 2.3 Mamíferos .............................................................................................. 88 2.3.1 Mamíferos Voladores (murciélagos) ...................................................... 88 2.3.2 Mamíferos pequeños no voladores ........................................................ 99 2.3.3 Mamíferos medianos y grandes .......................................................... 100 2.4 Anfibios y Reptiles ................................................................................ 110 2.4.1 Anfibios ............................................................................................ 111 2.4.2 Reptiles ............................................................................................ 117 2.5 Peces .................................................................................................. 125 3. VERIFICACIÓN DE COBERTURAS, AMENAZAS Y OPORTUNIDADES LOCALES DE ACUERDO AL USO ACTUAL Y MANEJO DE LAS ESPECIES DE FAUNA Y FLORA PRIORIZADAS .............................................................. 131 3.1 Flora .................................................................................................... 131 3.1.1 Ecosistema de sabana inundable ........................................................ 131 3.1.1.1 “Raudal ” de la Barquereña ............................................................. 131 3.1.1.1.1 Amenazas sobre el raudal de la Barquereña .................................. 132 3.1.1.1.2 Oportunidades locales para la conservación del raudal ................... 133 3.1.1.2 Esteros .......................................................................................... 133 3.1.1.2.1 Amenazas sobre los esteros .......................................................... 134 3.1.1.2.2 Oportunidades locales para la conservación de los esteros ............. 135 3.1.1.3 Bajos ............................................................................................. 136 3.1.1.3.1 Amenazas sobre los bajos ............................................................ 137 3.1.1.3.2 Oportunidades locales para la conservación de los bajos ................ 138 3.1.1.4 Bancos ........................................................................................... 138 3.1.1.4.1 Amenazas sobre los bancos .......................................................... 139 3.1.1.4.2 Oportunidades locales para la conservación de los bancos .............. 140 3.1.1.5 Matas de monte ............................................................................. 141 3.1.1.5.1 Amenazas sobre las “Matas de monte” .......................................... 142 3.1.1.5.2 Oportunidades para la conservación de las “matas de monte” ........ 143 4 Convenio de cooperación No. 13-12-067-023CE 3.1.2 Ecosistema de la “selva del Lipa” ........................................................ 144 3.1.2.1 Bosque ribereño ............................................................................. 144 3.1.2.1.1 Amenazas sobre el bosque ribereño .............................................. 145 3.1.2.1.2 Oportunidades para la conservación del bosque ribereño ............... 145 3.1.2.2 Bosque natural remanente o fragmentos de la “Selva del Lipa”.......... 146 3.1.2.2.1 Amenazas sobre el bosque natural remanente o fragmentos de la “Selva del Lipa” .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • FAMILY Loricariidae Rafinesque, 1815
    FAMILY Loricariidae Rafinesque, 1815 - suckermouth armored catfishes SUBFAMILY Lithogeninae Gosline, 1947 - suckermoth armored catfishes GENUS Lithogenes Eigenmann, 1909 - suckermouth armored catfishes Species Lithogenes valencia Provenzano et al., 2003 - Valencia suckermouth armored catfish Species Lithogenes villosus Eigenmann, 1909 - Potaro suckermouth armored catfish Species Lithogenes wahari Schaefer & Provenzano, 2008 - Cuao suckermouth armored catfish SUBFAMILY Delturinae Armbruster et al., 2006 - armored catfishes GENUS Delturus Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - armored catfishes [=Carinotus] Species Delturus angulicauda (Steindachner, 1877) - Mucuri armored catfish Species Delturus brevis Reis & Pereira, in Reis et al., 2006 - Aracuai armored catfish Species Delturus carinotus (La Monte, 1933) - Doce armored catfish Species Delturus parahybae Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - Parahyba armored catfish GENUS Hemipsilichthys Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - wide-mouthed catfishes [=Upsilodus, Xenomystus] Species Hemipsilichthys gobio (Lütken, 1874) - Parahyba wide-mouthed catfish [=victori] Species Hemipsilichthys nimius Pereira, 2003 - Pereque-Acu wide-mouthed catfish Species Hemipsilichthys papillatus Pereira et al., 2000 - Paraiba wide-mouthed catfish SUBFAMILY Rhinelepinae Armbruster, 2004 - suckermouth catfishes GENUS Pogonopoma Regan, 1904 - suckermouth armored catfishes, sucker catfishes [=Pogonopomoides] Species Pogonopoma obscurum Quevedo & Reis, 2002 - Canoas sucker catfish Species Pogonopoma parahybae (Steindachner, 1877) - Parahyba
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilocus Molecular Phylogeny of the Suckermouth Armored Catfishes
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus molecular phylogeny of the suckermouth armored catfishes (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) with a focus on subfamily Hypostominae ⇑ Nathan K. Lujan a,b, , Jonathan W. Armbruster c, Nathan R. Lovejoy d, Hernán López-Fernández a,b a Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada c Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada article info abstract Article history: The Neotropical catfish family Loricariidae is the fifth most species-rich vertebrate family on Earth, with Received 4 July 2014 over 800 valid species. The Hypostominae is its most species-rich, geographically widespread, and eco- Revised 15 August 2014 morphologically diverse subfamily. Here, we provide a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic reap- Accepted 20 August 2014 praisal of genus-level relationships in the Hypostominae based on our sequencing and analysis of two Available online xxxx mitochondrial and three nuclear loci (4293 bp total). Our most striking large-scale systematic discovery was that the tribe Hypostomini, which has traditionally been recognized as sister to tribe Ancistrini based Keywords: on morphological data, was nested within Ancistrini. This required recognition of seven additional tribe- Neotropics level clades: the Chaetostoma Clade, the Pseudancistrus Clade, the Lithoxus Clade, the ‘Pseudancistrus’ Guiana Shield Andes Mountains Clade, the Acanthicus Clade, the Hemiancistrus Clade, and the Peckoltia Clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Contents Report Credits.........................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................1 Introduction............................................................................................................2 Methods Plant Group................................................................................................3 Bird Group..................................................................................................3 Mammal Group..........................................................................................4 Reptile and Amphibian Group....................................................................4 Marine Group.............................................................................................4 Freshwater Group.......................................................................................5 Terrestrial Invertebrate Group...................................................................6 Fungi...........................................................................................................7 Public Participation.....................................................................................7 Results and Discussion Plant Group.................................................................................................8 Bird Group...................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • An Alphabetical List of Bromeliad Binomials
    AN ALPHABETICAL LIST OF BROMELIAD BINOMIALS Compiled by HARRY E. LUTHER The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Sarasota, Florida, USA ELEVENTH EDITION Published by the Bromeliad Society International June 2008 ii INTRODUCTION TO EDITION XI This list is presented as a spelling guide for validly published taxa accepted at the Bromeliad Identification Center. The list contains the following information: 1) Genus number (the left-hand number) based on the systematic sequence published in the Smith & Downs monograph: Bromeliaceae (Flora Neotropica, number 14, parts 1-3; 1974, 1977, 1979). Whole numbers are as published in the monograph. 2) Species number (the second number) according to its systematic position in the monograph. Note: Taxa not included in the monograph or that have been reclassified have been assigned numbers to reflect their systematic position within the Smith & Downs framework (e.g., taxon 14.1 is related to taxon 14). The utility of this method is that one may assume for example that Tillandsia comarapaensis (150.2) is related to T. didisticha (150) and therefore may have certain horticultural qualities in common with that species. 3) Genus and species names follow the respective numbers. 4) Subspecific taxa (subspecies, varieties, forms) names are indented below the species names. Note: Variety "a" (the type variety) is not listed unless it contains a form (see Aechmea caudata ). Similarly, the type form is not listed. 5) Author name follows the specific and subspecific names. These names are included for the convenience of specialist users of the list. This list does not contain publication data or synonymy, as it is not our intent for it to be a technical nomenclatural guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Distrito Regional De Manejo Integrado Cuervos Plan De
    DISTRITO REGIONAL DE MANEJO INTEGRADO CUERVOS PLAN DE MANEJO Convenio Marco 423-2016, Acta de ejecución CT-2016-001532-10 - Cornare No 564-2017 Suscrito entre Cornare y EPM “Continuidad del convenio interadministrativo 423-2016 acta de ejecución CT-2016-001532-10 suscrito entre Cornare y EPM para la implementación de proyectos de conservación ambiental y uso sostenible de los recursos naturales en el Oriente antioqueño” PRESENTADO POR: GRUPO BOSQUES Y BIODIVERSIDAD CORNARE EL Santuario – Antioquia 2018 REALIZACIÓN Corporación Autónoma Regional de las Cuencas de los Ríos Negro y Nare – Cornare GRUPO BOSQUES Y BIODIVERSIDAD COORDINADORA DE GRUPO BOSQUES Y BIODIVERSIDAD ELSA MARIA ACEVEDO CIFUENTES Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad SUPERVISOR DAVID ECHEVERRI LÓPEZ Biólogo (E), Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad SUPERVISOR EPM YULIE ANDREA JÍMENEZ GUZMAN Ingeniera Forestal, Epm EQUIPO PROFESIONAL GRUPO BOSQUES Y BIODIVERSIDAD LUZ ÁNGELA RIVERO HENAO Ingeniera Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad EDUARDO ANTONIO RIOS PINEDO Ingeniero Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad DANIEL MARTÍNEZ CASTAÑO Biólogo, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad STIVEN BARRIENTOS GÓMEZ Ingeniero Ambiental, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad NICOLAS RESTREPO ROMERO Ingeniero Ambiental, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad JULIETH VELASQUEZ AGUDELO Ingeniera Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad SANTIAGO OSORIO YEPES Ingeniero Forestal, Grupo Bosques y Biodiversidad TABLA DE CONTENIDO 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Rates of Body Size Evolution Should Show
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... The origins of diversity in frog communities: phylogeny, morphology, performance, and dispersal A Dissertation Presented by Daniel Steven Moen to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolution Stony Brook University August 2012 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Daniel Steven Moen We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. John J. Wiens – Dissertation Advisor Associate Professor, Ecology and Evolution Douglas J. Futuyma – Chairperson of Defense Distinguished Professor, Ecology and Evolution Stephan B. Munch – Ecology & Evolution Graduate Program Faculty Adjunct Associate Professor, Marine Sciences Research Center Duncan J. Irschick – Outside Committee Member Professor, Biology Department University of Massachusetts at Amherst This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Interim Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation The origins of diversity in frog communities: phylogeny, morphology, performance, and dispersal by Daniel Steven Moen Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolution Stony Brook University 2012 In this dissertation, I combine phylogenetics, comparative methods, and studies of morphology and ecological performance to understand the evolutionary and biogeographical factors that lead to the community structure we see today in frogs. In Chapter 1, I first summarize the conceptual background of the entire dissertation. In Chapter 2, I address the historical processes influencing body-size evolution in treefrogs by studying body-size diversification within Caribbean treefrogs (Hylidae: Osteopilus ).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Maldonado-Ocampo, Javier A.; Vari, Richard P.; Saulo Usma, José Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 9, núm. 2, 2008, pp. 143-237 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49120960001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Colombiana 9 (2) 143 - 237, 2008 Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo1; Richard P. Vari2; José Saulo Usma3 1 Investigador Asociado, curador encargado colección de peces de agua dulce, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Claustro de San Agustín, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia. Dirección actual: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940- 040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. [email protected] 2 Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC--159, National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013—7012. [email protected] 3 Coordinador Programa Ecosistemas de Agua Dulce WWF Colombia. Calle 61 No 3 A 26, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. [email protected] Abstract Data derived from the literature supplemented by examination of specimens in collections show that 1435 species of native fishes live in the freshwaters of Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 14 Issue 2: April. 2013
    CatChat Volume 14, Issue 2. April 2013 CATCHAT THE JOURNAL OF THE CATFISH STUDY GROUP Convention 2013 Discovery of a new Doradid Fish House Construction – Part 3 Literature Review What’s New Spring Auction Report CatChat Volume 14, Issue 1. January 2013 Catfish Study Group Committee President – Ian Fuller Secretary – Ian Fuller [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Editor - Mark Walters Vice-President – Dr. Peter Burgess [email protected] Chairman – Adrian Taylor BAP Secretary – Brian Walsh [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer – Danny Blundell Show Secretary – Brian Walsh [email protected] [email protected] Membership Secretary – Mike O’Sullivan Assistant Show Secretary – Ann Blundell [email protected] Website Manager – Allan James Auction Manager – David Barton [email protected] [email protected] Floor Member – Bill Hurst Assistant Auction Manager – Roy Barton [email protected] Confirmed Diary Dates – 2013 Date Meeting Details July 14th CSG on Tour - Castleford Aquarist Catfish & Loach Show August 18th Summer lectures & Sales meet Michael Hardman and Steve Bishop At Derwent Hall September 15th CSG Show and Auction At Derwent Hall October 20th TBA At Highfield Hall November 17th Autumn auction At Derwent Hall December 10th Christmas meeting At Highfield Hall Monthly meetings are held on the third Sunday of each month excet for the December meeting, which takes place on the second Sunday. Meetings start at 1.00 pm and are held at the Darwen Valley Community Centre, Sudellside Street, Darwen, Lan’s BB3 3DL Auctions, Open Show and Spring and Summer Lectures will be held at the Derwent Hall, George Street, Darwen, BB3 0DQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Norte Centro De Biociências Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Psicobiologia Doutorado Em Ps
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM PSICOBIOLOGIA DOUTORADO EM PSICOBIOLOGIA ANDRÉA SOARES DE ARAÚJO COMPOSIÇÃO ICTIOFAUNÍSTICA E ESTRATÉGIAS REPRODUTIVAS DE QUATRO ESPÉCIES DE PEIXES NATIVOS DA BACIA HIDROGRÁFICA PIRANHAS-ASSU, RIO GRANDE DO NORTE NATAL/RN JULHO, 2012 1 ANDRÉA SOARES DE ARAÚJO COMPOSIÇÃO ICTIOFAUNÍSTICA E ESTRATÉGIAS REPRODUTIVAS DE QUATRO ESPÉCIES DE PEIXES NATIVOS DA BACIA HIDROGRÁFICA PIRANHAS-ASSU, RIO GRANDE DO NORTE ORIENTADORA: Professora Doutora SATHYABAMA CHELLAPPA CO-ORIENTADORA: Professora Doutora MARIA EMÍLIA YAMAMOTO Tese apresentada a Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte como requisito para obtenção do Titulo de Doutor em Psicobiologia. NATAL/RN JULHO, 2012 Catalogação da publicação na fonte. UFRN/Biblioteca Central Zila Mamede Divisão de Processos Técnicos Araújo, Andréa Soares de. Composição ictiofaunística e estratégias reprodutivas de quatro espécies de peixes nativos da Bacia Hidrográfica Piranhas - Assu, Rio Grande do Norte / Andréa Soares de Araújo. – Natal, RN, 2012. 235f. : il. Orientadora: Sathyabama Chellappa. Co-orientadora: Maria Emília Yamamoto. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Biociências. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicobiologia. 1. Ictiologia – Piranhas, Rio, Bacia do (RN) – Tese. 2. Peixe – Reprodução – Rio Grande do Norte – Tese. 3. Jacundá (Crenecichla menezesi) – Tese. 4. Piau (Leporinus piau) – Tese. 5. Sardinha (Triportheus Angulatus) – Tese. 6. Branquinha (Psectrogaster rhomboides) – Tese. I. Chellappa, Sathyabama. II. Yamamoto, Maria Emília. III. Título. RN/UF/BCZM CDU 597.2/.5(813.2)(043.2) 2 Natal, RN 2012 3 AGRADECIMENTOS À Deus por iluminar meu caminho e me dar forças para seguir sempre em frente e por tudo que conquistei até agora.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information Tables
    Mapping the Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus Deanna H. Olson, David M. Aanensen, Kathryn L. Ronnenberg, Christopher I. Powell, Susan F. Walker, Jon Bielby, Trenton W. J. Garner, George Weaver, the Bd Mapping Group, and Matthew C. Fisher Supplemental Information Taxonomic Notes Genera were assigned to families for summarization (Table 1 in main text) and analysis (Table 2 in main text) based on the most recent available comprehensive taxonomic references (Frost et al. 2006, Frost 2008, Frost 2009, Frost 2011). We chose recent family designations to explore patterns of Bd susceptibility and occurrence because these classifications were based on both genetic and morphological data, and hence may more likely yield meaningful inference. Some North American species were assigned to genus according to Crother (2008), and dendrobatid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Grant et al. (2006). Eleutherodactylid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Hedges et al. (2008); centrolenid frogs based on Cisneros-Heredia et al. (2007). For the eleutherodactylid frogs of Central and South America and the Caribbean, older sources count them among the Leptodactylidae, whereas Frost et al. (2006) put them in the family Brachycephalidae. More recent work (Heinicke et al. 2007) suggests that most of the genera that were once “Eleutherodactylus” (including those species currently assigned to the genera Eleutherodactylus, Craugastor, Euhyas, Phrynopus, and Pristimantis and assorted others), may belong in a separate, or even several different new families. Subsequent work (Hedges et al. 2008) has divided them among three families, the Craugastoridae, the Eleutherodactylidae, and the Strabomantidae, which were used in our classification.
    [Show full text]