DOCSLIB.ORG

Haltere Afferents Provide Direct, Electrotonic Input to a Steering Motor Neuron in the Blowfly, Calliphora

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Haltere Afferents Provide Direct, Electrotonic Input to a Steering Motor Neuron in the Blowfly, Calliphora The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 1996, 16(16):5225–5232 Haltere Afferents Provide Direct, Electrotonic Input to a Steering Motor Neuron in the Blowfly, Calliphora Amir Fayyazuddin1 and Michael H. Dickinson1,2 1Committee on Neurobiology and 2Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 The first basalar muscle (b1) is one of 17 small muscles in flies found one identified haltere campaniform field (dF2) that pro- that control changes in wing stroke kinematics during steering vides strong synaptic input to the mnb1. This haltere to mnb1 maneuvers. The b1 is unique, however, in that it fires a single connection consists of a fast and a slow component. The fast phase-locked spike during each wingbeat cycle. The phase- component is monosynaptic, mediated by an electrical syn- locked firing of the b1’s motor neuron (mnb1) is thought to apse, and thus can follow haltere stimulation at high frequen- result from wingbeat-synchronous mechanosensory input, cies. The slow component is possibly polysynaptic, mediated such as that originating from the campaniform sensilla at the by a chemical synapse, and fatigues at high stimulus frequen- base of the halteres. Halteres are sophisticated equilibrium cies. Thus, the fast monosynaptic electrical pathway between organs of flies that function to detect angular rotations of the haltere afferents and mnb1 may be responsible in part for the body during flight. We have developed a new preparation to phase-locked firing of b1 during flight. determine whether the campaniform sensilla at the base of the halteres are responsible for the phasic activity of b1. Using Key words: haltere; gap junctions; sensory motor reflex; flight; intracellular recording and mechanical stimulation, we have mechanosensory; thoracic ganglion Sensory motor reflexes are conspicuous features of circuits that berg et al., 1986; Hengstenberg, 1988). The control of the wing- maintain the proper orientation of the body during postural stasis stroke resides with a set of 17 small steering muscles that are and locomotion. For example, in the vestibulo-ocular reflex of typically active only during steering maneuvers (Dickinson and vertebrates, information encoding involuntary head movements is Tu, 1996). A notable exception to this rule is the first basalar used to stabilize the visual field on the retina (Carpenter, 1988). muscle (b1), which fires a single action potential at a precise phase An analogous reflex is found among dipterous insects in which the during each wingbeat. During visually induced steering reactions, direction and magnitude of body rotations are encoded and used the firing phase of the b1 may shift 1–2 msec within the wingstroke to make corrective wing and head movements during flight (Faust, (Heide, 1983; Egelhaaf, 1989; Heide and Go¨tz, 1996; Tu and 1952; Sandeman, 1980; Hengstenberg, 1991). However, unlike Dickinson, 1996). These temporal changes, although small, can vertebrates that possess a vestibular system for detecting head affect the biomechanical properties of b1 (Tu and Dickinson, movements, the fly detects changes in body motion with special- 1994) and result in an increased stroke amplitude and adduction ized sensory organs called halteres. of the wing during the downstroke (Tu and Dickinson, 1996). Halteres are barbell-shaped appendages of the third thoracic Although the kinematic consequences of phase shifts in b1 now segment that are derived through evolution from the hind wings. seem clear, the neural mechanisms underlying them are not. During flight, these structures oscillate in antiphase to the wing Wingbeat-synchronous mechanosensory afferents on the wing and and, hence, their massive end knob is subjected to a variety of haltere are thought to provide the feedback for the phase tuning forces. In turn, these forces are encoded into spike trains by of the b1 motor neuron (mnb1) (Heide, 1983; Miyan and Ewing, specialized cuticular strain detectors, campaniform sensilla, that 1984). Haltere afferents are known to terminate in the mesotho- are arranged in five distinct fields at the base of the haltere racic neuropil, where flight motor neurons reside (Chan and (Fraenkel and Pringle, 1938; Pringle, 1948). Although the haltere Dickinson, 1996) and input from a single haltere is sufficient to is subjected to inertial and gravitational forces, the sensory cells provide some phase tuning of both the ipsilateral and contralat- appear most sensitive to Coriolis forces acting on the end-knob eral mnb1s during flight (Heide, 1983). Taken together, these during angular rotation of the body (Nalbach, 1993, 1994). The physiological and anatomical data suggest that haltere afferents compensatory reactions elicited by the halteres include head may provide strong synaptic drive to mnb1. There has been, movements and changes in the wingstroke kinematics (Hengsten- however, no direct demonstration of this sensory motor pathway. In this paper, we will present evidence that the reflex between the Received April 10, 1996; revised May 28, 1996; accepted May 30, 1996. haltere afferents and mnb1 is monosynaptic, that it consists of This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32- both electrical and chemical synapses, and that the electrical GM-07839 to A.F., and by the David and Lucille Packard Fellowship for Science and component appears to be formed by afferents from a single Engineering and National Science Foundation Grant IBN-0208765 awarded to haltere field. M.H.D. We thank Dr. Jonathan Art for use of the piezoelectric crystal used for mechanical stimulation in this study. Correspondence should be addressed to Michael Dickinson, Department of Inte- MATERIALS AND METHODS grative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. Preparation. We used 1- to 3-d-old adult Calliphora vicina obtained from Copyright q 1996 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/96/165225-08$05.00/0 a culture maintained in our laboratory. After anesthetizing the flies by 5226 J. Neurosci., August 15, 1996, 16(16):5225–5232 Fayyazuddin and Dickinson • Haltere Input to a Steering Motor Neuron were recorded using an Axoclamp 2A intracellular amplifier (Axon In- struments, Foster City, CA) and filtered at 10 kHz. Extracellular signals from suction electrodes on the b1 nerve and the haltere nerve were amplified with an A-M systems 1800 extracellular amplifier with bandpass filters set at 0.3 and 5 kHz. All signals were digitized using a Vetter 3000A PCM and stored on videotape for later analysis. We used Axotape software (Axon Instruments) for off-line inspection and analysis of the data. Identification of the b1 motor neuron. The mnb1 was located by land- marks and occasionally by visual identification of its primary dendrite. The resting potential of mnb1 ranged from 250 to 260 mV. In prelim- inary experiments, we verified the cell’s identity by iontophoresis of either Lucifer yellow or neurobiotin at the end of an intracellular recording. These fills were then compared with preparations in which the motor neuron had been back-filled from the muscle with biotinylated dextrans and subsequently visualized using diaminobenzidine (DAB) (for proto- col, see Chan and Dickinson, 1996). A camera lucida drawing of a back-filled preparation of mnb1 is shown in Figure 1B. However, ana- tomical verifications of mnb1 recordings were somewhat problematic because of the virtually identical central morphology of mnb1 and mnb2, the motor neuron supplying the second basalar muscle (Fayyazuddin et al., 1993). In cases in which the tracer did not fill the motor neuron axon past the point where it branches from the anterior dorsal mesothoracic nerve (ADMN), it was difficult to distinguish between intracellular fills of mnb1 and mnb2. For these reasons, and to allow the use of lower resistance electrodes, we developed a more rigorous criterion for identi- fying mnb1. In all experiments from which data are presented, we were able to verify intracellular penetrations of mnb1 by recording extracellu- lar spikes from its axon using a suction electrode placed on the b1 nerve, a small branch of the ADMN that supplies b1 (Heide, 1983). The b1 nerve contains only the large axon of mnb1 (;25 mm diameter) (Heide, 1983), a tiny axon from a ventral unpaired median cell supplying the b1 muscle (King and Tanouye, 1983; Tu and Dickinson, 1994), and a few small afferent fibers from sensilla on the side of the thorax (;3 mm diameter) (Heide, 1983). The spikes in the mnb1 axon could be easily distinguished from those of other cells in the b1 nerve because of their large size and their one-for-one relationship with contractions in the b1 muscle. After intracellular penetration, the identity of mnb1 was estab- lished by injecting current to elicit spikes and verifying that extracellularly recorded spikes in the b1 nerve followed the intracellularly recorded spikes with a short latency (,1 msec) and in a one-for-one manner. Bath perfusion. We used a modification of the perfusion method of Hengstenberg (1982) to exchange solutions bathing the thoracic ganglion. Influx was gravity driven through a blunt 30 gauge needle placed just Figure 1. A, Experimental configuration for intracellular recording of anterior to the right wing nerve. The efflux from the preparation flowed mnb1. The preparation was perfused to allow constant exchange of solu- out through a beveled needle placed posterior to the left wing nerve. A tion. Suction electrodes were placed on the b1 nerve to record the activity peristaltic pump (Cole-Parmer) was used to move solution out of the of the mnb1 axon, and on the haltere nerve (HN) to record the response bath. By this method, solutions could be exchanged within 60 sec with of haltere afferents. B, Diagram of Calliphora thoracic ganglion showing minimal movement in the level of the bath solution. The solutions used in location of the mnb1. The arrowhead marks the putative recording site on the various experiments are given in Table 1. the dendrite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SHOO FLY! Houseflies, Those Pesky Flying Insects That Show up Uninvited
    SHOO FLY! Houseflies, those pesky flying insects that show up uninvited at your summer picnic or slip into your house if you leave a door open too long, are so annoying. Sometimes it seems that they are everywhere! Did you know that there are more than 100,000 different kinds of flies? The housefly is frequently found around humans and on farms and ranches that raise animals. Flies are pests. Not only are they annoying, they also spread diseases to humans. Flies eat rotten things like dead animals, feces (poop), and garbage. As they crawl around on that stuff they pick up germs and spread them wherever they land. Flies are decomposers, living things (such as bacteria, fungus, or insect) that feed on and break down plant and animal matter into simpler parts. Decomposers act as a clean up crew and perform an important job, making sure all of that plant and animal matter doesn’t pile up. Fly Facts: Instead of having a skeleton inside their bodies, flies are hard on the outside and soft on the inside. Their type of skeleton is called an exoskeleton. Flies eat only liquid food. If they land on solid food, they spit on it through their proboscis (part of their mouth). This softens the food so they can eat it. A fly’s tongue is shaped like a straw to sip their food. Since they eat only liquids, flies poop a lot. It is thought that they poop every time they land, so they leave poop everywhere! Flies are very hard to swat because of their excellent eyesight, fast reaction time, and agility (the ability to move quickly and easily).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitos Fail at Flight in Heavy Fog 19 November 2012
    Mosquitos fail at flight in heavy fog 19 November 2012 Mosquitos have the remarkable ability to fly in clear These halteres are on a comparable size to the fog skies as well as in rain, shrugging off impacts from droplets and they flap approximately 400 times raindrops more than 50 times their body mass. But each second, striking thousands of drops per just like modern aircraft, mosquitos also are second. Though the halteres can normally repel grounded when the fog thickens. Researchers from water, repeated collisions with 5-micron fog the Georgia Institute of Technology present their particles hinders flight control, leading to flight findings at the 65th meeting of the American failure. Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics, Nov. 18 - 20, in San Diego, Calif. "Thus the halteres cannot sense their position correctly and malfunction, similarly to how "Raindrop and fog impacts affect mosquitoes quite windshield wipers fail to work well when the rain is differently," said Georgia Tech researcher Andrew very heavy or if there is snow on the windshield," Dickerson. "From a mosquito's perspective, a said Dickerson. "This study shows us that insect falling raindrop is like us being struck by a small flight is similar to human flight in aircraft in that flight car. A fog particle – weighing 20 million times less is not possible when the insects cannot sense their than a mosquito – is like being struck by a crumb. surroundings." For humans, visibility hinders flight; Thus, fog is to a mosquito as rain is to a human." whereas for insects it is their gyroscopic flight sensors." On average during a rainstorm, mosquitos get struck by a drop once every 20 seconds, but fog More information: The talk, "Mosquito Flight particles surround the mosquito continuously as it Failure in Heavy Fog," is at 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots)
    Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Adults lay eggs. Eggs hatch into larvae (maggots, wigglers, etc.). Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause larvae to pupate. Inside the pupal case the pupae change in form and in color and develop wings. The emerging adults look completely different from the larvae. Adults–All (except a few wingless species) have only one pair of membranous wings, thus the name Diptera meaning "two wings". The forewings are fully developed and functional, while the hindwings are reduced to knobbed clubs called halteres, which are difficult to see without magnification except for larger specimens (e.g., crane flies). They are the best fliers in the insect world and possibly beyond: they can hover, fly backwards and upside-down and turn on the spot. Their eyes are usually large and multi-faceted, with males usually having larger eyes than females. Although many mimic bees and wasps, none have stingers. The order Diptera comprises two main suborders: long-horned (Nematocera) and short-horned Brachycera). Nematocera have long legs, long antennae and look fragile (e.g., mosquitoes, gnats, and midges, etc.) while Brachycera have stout bodies and short, stout antennae (e.g., horse flies, house flies, robber flies, hover flies, etc.). (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) One pair of wings One pair of halteres Large, multifaceted eyes Robust-looking Short, stubby antennae Fragile-looking Many species are tiny Brachycera (Brachycera) Nematocera (Nematocera) Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Adults lay eggs, usually where larval food is plentiful.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex
    4100 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 22, 2019 • 39(21):4100–4112 Systems/Circuits Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex X Nicholas D. Kathman and XJessica L. Fox Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 The reduced hindwings of flies, known as halteres, are specialized mechanosensory organs that detect body rotations during flight. Primary afferents of the haltere encode its oscillation frequency linearly over a wide bandwidth and with precise phase-dependent spiking. However, it is not currently known whether information from haltere primary afferent neurons is sent to higher brain centers where sensory information about body position could be used in decision making, or whether precise spike timing is useful beyond the peripheral circuits that drive wing movements. We show that in cells in the central brain, the timing and rates of neural spiking can be modulatedbysensoryinputfromexperimentalhalteremovements(drivenbyaservomotor).Usingmultichannelextracellularrecording in restrained flesh flies (Sarcophaga bullata of both sexes), we examined responses of central complex cells to a range of haltere oscillation frequencies alone, and in combination with visual motion speeds and directions. Haltere-responsive units fell into multiple response classes, including those responding to any haltere motion and others with firing rates linearly related to the haltere frequency. Cells with multisensory responses showed higher firing rates than the sum of the unisensory responses at higher haltere frequencies. They also maintained visual properties, such as directional selectivity, while increasing response gain nonlinearly with haltere frequency. Although haltere inputs have been described extensively in the context of rapid locomotion control, we find haltere sensory information in a brain region known to be involved in slower, higher-order behaviors, such as navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Basis of Wing and Haltere Coordination in Flies
    Biomechanical basis of wing and haltere coordination in flies Tanvi Deora, Amit Kumar Singh, and Sanjay P. Sane1 National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India Edited by M. A. R. Koehl, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved December 16, 2014 (received for review June 30, 2014) The spectacular success and diversification of insects rests critically unclear, especially in its ability to mediate rapid wing movement. on two major evolutionary adaptations. First, the evolution of flight, Moreover, faster wing movements require rapid sensory motor which enhanced the ability of insects to colonize novel ecological integration by the insect nervous system. The hind wings of habitats, evade predators, or hunt prey; and second, the miniatur- Diptera have evolved into a pair of mechanosensory halteres that ization of their body size, which profoundly influenced all aspects of detect gyroscopic forces during flight (10–13). The rapid feed- their biology from development to behavior. However, miniaturi- back from halteres is essential for flies to sense and control self- zation imposes steep demands on the flight system because smaller rotations during complex aerobatic maneuvers (13–15). In the insects must flap their wings at higher frequencies to generate majority of flies, the bilateral wings move in-phase, whereas sufficient aerodynamic forces to stay aloft; it also poses challenges halteres move antiphase relative to the wings. This relative co- to the sensorimotor system because precise control of wing ordination between wings and halteres is extremely precise even kinematics and body trajectories requires fast sensory feedback. at frequencies far exceeding 100 Hz.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 12-17: Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola – Diptera Overview. Chapt. 12-17. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 12-17-1 Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 12-17 TERRESTRIAL INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – DIPTERA BIOLOGY AND HABITATS TABLE OF CONTENTS Diptera Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 12-17-2 Role of Bryophytes ................................................................................................................................. 12-17-3 Collection and Extraction Methods ......................................................................................................... 12-17-6 Fly Dispersal of Spores ........................................................................................................................... 12-17-8 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................................ 12-17-13 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................... 12-17-13 Forests ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ∗
    Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ¤ W.C. Wu R.J. Wood R.S. Fearing Department of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 fwcwu, rjwood, [email protected] Abstract MFI. On the other hand, piezoelectric vibrating struc- tures have been developed and have proven to be able The mechanism which real flying insects use to de- to detect Coriolis force with high accuracy [8]. There- tect body rotation has been simulated. The results show fore, based on the gyroscopic sensing of real flies, a that an angular rate sensor can be made based on such novel design using piezoelectric devices is being con- a biological mechanism. Two types of biomimetic gy- sidered. This paper describes the simulations and fab- roscopes have been constructed using foils of stainless rication of this type of biologically inspired angular steel. The ¯rst device is connected directly to a com- rate sensor for use on the MFI. pliant cantilever. The second device is placed on a mechanically amplifying fourbar structure. Both de- 2 Haltere Morphology vices are driven by piezoelectric actuators and detect the Coriolis force using strain gages. The experimental Research on insect flight revealed that in order to results show successful measurements of angular veloc- maintain stable flight, insects use structures, called ities and these devices have the bene¯ts of low power halteres, to detect body rotations via gyroscopic forces and high sensitivity. [5]. The halteres of a fly evolved from hindwings and are hidden in the space between thorax and abdomen 1 Introduction so that air current has negligible e®ect on them (see ¯gure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION in DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, and CONTROL REALIZATION by Rhoe A. Thompson August 2009 Chair: Dr
    HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION IN DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, AND CONTROL REALIZATION By RHOE A. THOMPSON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 °c 2009 Rhoe A. Thompson 2 I dedicate this work to my wife, Ann, and children, Ryan, Rachel, and Jessica. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my committee chair, Dr. Warren Dixon, for his timely words of encouragement and the example he has provided. His passion for his work and professionalism have been a motivational factor in the success of all of his students. I would also like to acknowledge the other members of my committee, Dr. Carl Crane, Dr. Norman Fitz-Coy, Dr. Daniel Hahn, Mr. Ric Wehling and Mr. Johnny Evers for taking the time to review my work and for providing insightful suggestions for improvement. I would like to acknowledge the many distinguished professors I have learned from over the years at the University of Florida, one of the most memorable being the late Prof. Knox Millsaps. To the dismay of some students, Prof. Millsaps would at times spend much of his class telling fascinating stories about his career and the historical ¯gures he had encountered. He told us once, \Learning is best accomplished late at night, solving problems in the company of a good text book and a desk lamp." I have come to believe that the stories he told to motivate the desire to learn were at least as important as the examples he worked on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • "Homology and Homoplasy: a Philosophical Perspective"
    Homology and Introductory article Homoplasy: A Article Contents . The Concept of Homology up to Darwin . Adaptationist, Taxic and Developmental Concepts of Philosophical Perspective Homology . Developmental Homology Ron Amundson, University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hawaii, USA . Character Identity Networks Online posting date: 15th October 2012 Homology refers to the underlying sameness of distinct Homology is sameness, judged by various kinds of body parts or other organic features. The concept became similarity. The recognition of body parts that are shared by crucial to the understanding of relationships among different kinds of organisms dates at least back to Aristotle, organisms during the early nineteenth century. Its but acceptance of this fact as scientifically important to biology developed during the first half of the nineteenth importance has vacillated during the years between the century. In an influential definition published in 1843, publication of Darwin’s Origin of Species and recent times. Richard Owen defined homologues as ‘the same organ in For much of the twentieth century, homology was different animals under every variety of form and function’ regarded as nothing more than evidence of common (Owen, 1843). Owen had a very particular kind of struc- descent. In recent times, however, it has regained its for- tural sameness in mind. It was not to be confused with mer importance. It is regarded by advocates of evo- similarities that are due to shared function, which were lutionary developmental biology as a source of evidence termed ‘analogy.’ Bird wings are not homologous to insect for developmental constraint, and evidence for biases in wings, even though they look similar and perform the same phenotypic variation and the commonalities in organic function.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoding Properties of Haltere Neurons Enable Motion Feature Detection in a Biological Gyroscope
    Encoding properties of haltere neurons enable motion feature detection in a biological gyroscope Jessica L. Foxa,1, Adrienne L. Fairhalla,b, and Thomas L. Daniela,c aProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior, bDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, and cDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Edited by John G. Hildebrand, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved January 4, 2010 (received for review October 30, 2009) The halteres of dipteran insects are essential sensory organs for flight be transmitted directly to a motor neuron via an electrotonic gap control. They are believed to detect Coriolis and other inertial forces junction (12), and thus is not further refined in the central nervous associated with body rotation during flight. Flies use this information system before affecting behavior (13, 14). By characterizing the for rapid flight control. We show that the primary afferent neurons of encoding properties, we are able to examine neural information the haltere’s mechanoreceptors respond selectively with high tempo- processing at the earliest sensory and immediate premotor levels ral precision to multiple stimulus features. Although we are able to simultaneously. In doing so, we reveal the mechanisms by which identify many stimulus features contributing to the response using neurons convert complex stimuli into a train of spikes that can be principal component analysis, predictive models using only two fea- immediately used to control a complex behavior. tures, common across the cell population, capture most of the cells’ encoding activity. However, different sensitivity to these two fea- Results turespermits eachcell to respond to sinusoidal stimuli with a different Haltere Afferents Show Diverse Responses to Complex Stimuli with preferred phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of the Thorax in Flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 1382-1395 doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 REVIEW Mechanics of the thorax in flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P. Sane1,* ABSTRACT body size, which greatly facilitated adaptability by increasing their Insects represent more than 60% of all multicellular life forms, and are ecological range; and two, the evolution of flight, which enabled easily among the most diverse and abundant organisms on earth. dispersal, migration, predation or rapid escape from predator They evolved functional wings and the ability to fly, which enabled attacks. them to occupy diverse niches. Insects of the hyper-diverse orders Although miniature body forms are a common evolutionary trend show extreme miniaturization of their body size. The reduced body among other animals, including birds and mammals (e.g. Hanken size, however, imposes steep constraints on flight ability, as their and Wake, 1993), miniaturization takes on a rather extreme form in wings must flap faster to generate sufficient forces to stay aloft. Here, insects. For example, the size of adult parasitic chalcid wasps such ∼ we discuss the various physiological and biomechanical adaptations as Kikiki huna ( 150 µm) or the trichogrammatid wasp ∼ of the thorax in flies which enabled them to overcome the myriad Megaphragma mymaripenne ( 170 µm) is comparable to that of constraints of small body size, while ensuring very precise control of some unicellular protozoan organisms (Polilov, 2012, 2015); these their wing motion. One such adaptation is the evolution of specialized wasps are among the smallest metazoans ever described. Such myogenic or asynchronous muscles that power the high-frequency extreme miniaturization is especially common among parasitoid – wing motion, in combination with neurogenic or synchronous steering insects belonging to three of the five insect groups Diptera (flies), – muscles that control higher-order wing kinematic patterns.
    [Show full text]