DOCSLIB.ORG

July 30, 2011 Aspen, Colorado the 2011 Aspen SECURITY Forum Is Proudly Presented By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
July 30, 2011 Aspen, Colorado the 2011 Aspen SECURITY Forum Is Proudly Presented By The Aspen Institute mission is twofold: to foster values-based leadership, encouraging individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussing and acting on critical issues. The Aspen Institute does this primarily in four ways: seminars, young-leader fellowships around the globe, policy programs, and public conferences and events. The Institute is based in Washington, DC, Aspen, CO, and on the Wye River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore and has an international network of partners. For more information, visit www.aspeninstitute.org. July 27 – July 30, 2011 Aspen, Colorado THE 2011 ASPEN SECURITY FOruM is proudly presented by 2 1 3 THE 2011 ASPEN SECURITY FOruM 4 is proudly sponsored by 1 2 5 3 4 6 5 6 7 8 9 7 9 8 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 3 Welcome 5 Homeland Security Program PROGRAM 6 Forum Schedule SPEAKERS 14 Speakers and Moderators 18 Speaker Biographies 31 Moderator Biographies GENERAL INFORMATION 37 General Information 40 Aspen Map ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 43 Special Thanks 44 Forum Team JULY 27-30, 2011 THE ASPEN SECURITY FORUM ASPEN, COLORADO 1 The New York Times The York New salutes The Aspen Institute’s Forum on Homeland Security 10-1161AspenSalute_4c_PM1.indd 1 6/4/10 4:08:37 PM INTRODUCTION Welcome to the second annual Aspen Security Forum. Last summer’s debut forum exceeded our expectations in every respect. In just one year, the Forum is firmly established as the “go to” event of the year for homeland security/counterterrorism professionals and those intensely interested in this field. A number of things distinguish the Aspen Security Forum from the many other forums and conferences in this issue area. First is the wide range of topics covered and the breadth and depth of speakers who cover them. For three days, top-level present and former policymakers representing all of the relevant government agencies, industry leaders, leading thinkers in think tanks and academe, noted print and broadcast journalists, and concerned citizens will discuss and debate the major issues of the day in aviation security, maritime security, border security, mass transit security, critical infrastructure protection and “soft target” security, cyber-security, intelligence, terrorism finance, the legal aspects of the “war on terror,” counterterrorism strategy, and more. Second, there are no canned speeches, dry lectures, or mind-numbing PowerPoint presentations. Instead, the Forum features a series of thoughtful and thought-provoking conversations between speakers and moderators, and then between the speakers and the members of the audience. Third, the moderators are all “A-list” print and broadcast journalists from the nation’s leading media outlets, each of whom has deep expertise in this field and is especially adept at the probing and prodding that can elicit the insights and confidences that security professionals usually keep to themselves. And, not incidentally, all sessions are on the record, so the information obtained can be widely shared and put to good use. Fourth, the Forum takes place in a magical setting, amid the majestic mountains that surround our Aspen Meadows campus and cooled by the gentle breezes of a glorious Aspen summer. Like the dialogue, this bucolic setting is itself thought-provoking and mind-expanding. And, unlike the typical conference in Washington and other big cities where speakers and attendees tend to come and go, Forum participants tend to “come and stay.” This sustained participation leads to chance encounters and impromptu gatherings, at breaks, or over drinks or meals, and during long walks, that help to cement existing relationships and to build news ones with key decision makers and thought leaders. We are delighted by your being with us for the Aspen Security Forum in this critical year marking the tenth anniversary of 9/11. The key question for the forum this year – and, I believe, for the nation as a whole – is whether our success in finding and killing Osama bin Laden is the beginning of the end of the “war on terrorism,” or merely the end of the beginning, leading to a new, and perhaps even more dangerous phase in this now decade-long war. We look forward to exploring this overarching issue and many others with you as you settle in and engage with us for the next few days here at Aspen Meadows. Clark Kent Ervin Director, Homeland Security Program The Aspen Institute JULY 27-30, 2011 THE ASPEN SECURITY FORUM ASPEN, COLORADO 3 SECURING OUR TODAY, SAFEGUARDING OUR TOMORROW AGT International. Unlocking the potential of the world. www.agtinternational.com THE ASPEN INSTITUTE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Through public and invitation-only forums, roundtables and conferences, speeches, books, opinion editorials, social media outlets, and media interviews and appearances, the Aspen Institute’s Homeland Security Program works to heighten public awareness as to the nation’s continued vulnerability to terrorism and to persuade decision makers to take the necessary steps to close the gap between how secure we should be and how secure we actually are. PUBLIC PROGRAMS In partnership with The New York Times the annual Aspen Security Forum is held at our campus in Aspen. Each year the forum brings to Aspen top policymakers, leading thinkers, industry insiders, and concerned citizens together to explore aviation security, maritime security, border security, mass transit security, cyber-security and other aspects of critical infrastructure security, “soft targets” security, intelligence, counterterrorism strategy, and more. For more information, please visit www.aspensecurityforum.org. INVITATION-ONLY POLICY PROGRAMS Luncheon Roundtables The program occasionally features government officials and other newsmakers for luncheon roundtable discussions about key homeland security/counterterrorism issues. Featured guests have included Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, National Counterterrorism Center Director Michael Leiter, and Terrorist Screening Center Director Timothy Healy. Aspen Homeland Security Group Modeled on the longstanding Aspen Strategy Group, a bipartisan group of foreign policy experts, the Aspen Homeland Security Group is a bipartisan group of homeland security and counterterrorism experts whom the program periodically convenes in Washington, DC and at our Aspen campus to discuss issues in depth and make recommendations to policymakers. The Aspen Homeland Security Group is co-chaired by former Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff and former Congresswoman Jane Harman. Roundtable on How the Venture Capital Industry Can Help to Secure the Homeland In partnership with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Stanford University, and a Silicon Valley venture capital firm, Levensohn Venture Partners, the program convened Silicon Valley venture capitalists and key Washington decision makers in the homeland security and intelligence communities at Stanford in October, 2009 to discuss how the venture capital industry can play a greater role in founding and funding homeland security-related technologies. A follow-up discussion took place in October, 2010 in Cambridge, MA for Boston-area venture capitalists. The Homeland Security Program is planning additional discussions in other VC hubs around the country. Cities’ Preparedness for Terrorism Roundtables Thanks to a generous lead grant from the Ford Foundation, supplemented by additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the McCormick Foundation, and the Houston Endowment, the program convened policymakers and leading thinkers in five cities—New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, and New Orleans—to assess those cities’ preparedness for terrorism. For more information, please see http://as.pn/6j. JULY 27-30, 2011 THE ASPEN SECURITY FORUM ASPEN, COLORADO 5 FORUM SCHEDULE WEDNESDAY July 27 6:00–7:15 pm THE ROLE OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES IN THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM The commander of Special Operations Forces will explain their role in the successful hunt for Osama bin Laden; the ongoing searches for Ayman al-Zawahiri, Mullah Omar, Anwar al-Awlaki, and other top terrorists; and “the war on terror” in general around the globe. Eric T. Olson, Commander, US Special Operations Command MODERATOR Martha Raddatz, ABC News GREENWALD PAVILION 7:15–8:30 pm OPENING RECEPTION SCHEDULE MCNULTY ROOM, DOERR-HOSIER CENTER THURSDAY July 28 8:00–9:00 am BREAKFAST DOERR-HOSIER CENTER 9:00–10:00 am COUNTERTERRORISM: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE The former director of the National Counterterrorism Center will reflect on his tenure and give us his forecast of the counterterrorism challenges that will face his successors in the next decade. Michael Leiter, former Director, National Counterterrorism Center, Office of the Director of National Intelligence MODERATOR David Sanger, The New York Times MCNULTY ROOM, DOERR-HOSIER CENTER 10:00–10:15 am BREAK 10:15–11:15 am AVIATION SECURITY Ten years after 9/11 and billions of dollars later, gaps remain in aviation security, as shown by the “underwear bomber” and the cargo bomb plot. Meanwhile, the public’s tolerance for heightened security measures is waning. Is there a way to close the security gaps that remain and lessen the inconvenience to the traveling public? Or must we choose between security and convenience? John Pistole, Assistant Secretary of the Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security MODERATOR Jeanne Meserve, CNN MCNULTY ROOM, DOERR-HOSIER CENTER 11:15–11:30 am BREAK
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward R. Murrow Awards
    TW MAIN 10-06-08 A 13 TVWEEK 10/2/2008 5:49 PM Page 1 TELEVISIONWEEK October 6, 2008 13 INSIDE SPECIAL SECTION NewsproTHE STATE OF TV NEWS All About ABC The network’s news division will take home half the awards in national/syndie categories. Page 14 Engrossing Stories NBC News’ Bob Dotson gets fourth Murrow for stories that make viewers “late for the bus.” Page 14 Eyeing CBS’ Efforts CBS News, CBSnews.com are honored for excellence in real and virtual worlds. Page 16 ‘Sports Center’ a Winner for ESPN Saga of former tennis champ Andrea Jaeger offers perspective on her unique journey. Page 17 EDWARD R. Murrows Laud Excellence at Network, Local Levels MURROW By Debra Kaufman AWARDS Special to TelevisionWeek Honoring: The Radio-Television News Directors Association gathers Oct. 13 Survival Saga ESPN Deportes’ “Sobrevivientes” Excellence in at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York to present the 2008 Edward R. electronic tracks survivors of a rugby team’s plane crash in the Andes. Page 18 journalism Murrow Awards. Where: Grand In addition to recipients of the 38th Murrow Awards, winners Personal Touch Hyatt, New York of the RTNDA/Unity Awards—which acknowledge news organi- Seattle’s KOMO-TV takes large- When: Monday, market laurel for its “Problem Oct. 13 zations’ commitment to covering issues of diversity in their com- Solvers” franchise. Page 18 Presenters: munities—will be honored. Out of an initial pool of 3,459 entries, Lester Holt, Community Service Soledad O’Brien, 54 news organizations are being honored with 77 awards. In the small-market race, WJAR-TV Maggie “Everyone is proud of receiving an Edward R.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Games Announces CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair Frances Townsend to Give EMPOWER Conference Keynote Address
    Scientific Games Announces CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair Frances Townsend To Give EMPOWER Conference Keynote Address February 15, 2017 10:05 AM ET LAS VEGAS, Feb. 15, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Scientific Games Corporation (NASDAQ: SGMS) ("Scientific Games" or the "Company") today announced that Frances Frago Townsend, CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair, will give the keynote address March 8 during the Company's EMPOWER customer conference at Planet Hollywood Las Vegas Resort & Casino on the Las Vegas Strip. The well-known and highly regarded homeland security expert and TV personality will address the more than 600 attendees at Scientific Games' EMPOWER conference, speaking on "Leading During Turbulent Times: Remembering the 5 C's." Townsend is currently Executive Vice President for Worldwide Government, Legal and Business Affairs at MacAndrews and Forbes Incorporated, wholly owned by Scientific Games Chairman of the Board Ronald O. Perelman. She works across MacAndrew's portfolio companies, focusing on international, legal, compliance and business development issues. Prior to that, she was a corporate partner with the law firm of Baker Botts, LLP. From 2004 to 2008, Townsend served as Assistant to President George W. Bush for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and chaired the Homeland Security Council. She also served as Deputy National Security Advisor for Combatting Terrorism from May 2003 to May 2004. Townsend spent 13 years at the U.S. Department of Justice under the administrations of President George H. W. Bush, President Bill Clinton, and President George W. Bush. She has received numerous awards for her public service accomplishments.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1
    Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 2 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties BENS Practitioners Panel Michael Allen Thomas Kean Former Majority Staff Director House Perma- Chair, The National Commission on Terrorist nent Select Committee on Intelligence United Attacks Upon the United States States House of Representatives Former Governor of New Jersey Alfred Berkeley Michael Leiter Vice Chair National Infrastructure Advisory Former Director of the National Counterter- Council rorism Center Former President NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Joseph Lieberman Michael Chertoff (Vice Chair) Former United States Senator (CT) Former Secretary of Homeland Security Former Chairman Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Commissioner Edward Davis United States Senate Former Commissioner, Boston Police Department James Locher Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Robert Graham (Vice Chair) Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict Former Governor of Florida Former Chairman Senate Select Committee Steven McCraw (Vice Chair) on Intelligence United States Senate Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor David Hall of Texas Director Missouri Information and Analysis Center Norton Schwartz (Chair) President & CEO Business Executives Lee Hamilton for National Security Former United States Representative (IN) Vice Chair The National Commission Maurice Sonnenberg on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Former Member President’s Intelligence Advisory Board Michael Hayden Vice Chair Report of the National Former Director CIA Commission on Terrorism Former Director NSA Frances Townsend Brian Michael Jenkins Former Assistant to the President for Home- Senior Advisor to the President RAND land Security and Counterterrorism Corporation Juan Zarate Loch K.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Going Viral 2021
    2021 13th International Conference on Cyber Confict: Going Viral T. Jančárková, L. Lindström, G. Visky, P. Zotz (Eds.) 2021 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER CONFLICT: GOING VIRAL Copyright © 2021 by NATO CCDCOE Publications. All rights reserved. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP2126N-PRT ISBN (print): 978-9916-9565-4-0 ISBN (pdf): 978-9916-9565-5-7 COPYRIGHT AND REPRINT PERMISSIONS No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence ([email protected]). This restriction does not apply to making digital or hard copies of this publication for internal use within NATO, or for personal or educational use when for non-proft or non-commercial purposes, providing that copies bear this notice and a full citation on the frst page as follows: [Article author(s)], [full article title] 2021 13th International Conference on Cyber Confict: Going Viral T. Jančárková, L. Lindström, G. Visky, P. Zotz (Eds.) 2021 © NATO CCDCOE Publications NATO CCDCOE Publications LEGAL NOTICE: This publication contains the opinions of the respective authors only. They do not Filtri tee 12, 10132 Tallinn, Estonia necessarily refect the policy or the opinion of NATO Phone: +372 717 6800 CCDCOE, NATO, or any agency or any government. NATO CCDCOE may not be held responsible for Fax: +372 717 6308 any loss or harm arising from the use of information E-mail: [email protected] contained in this book and is not responsible for the Web: www.ccdcoe.org content of the external sources, including external websites referenced in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Chapter 4 Building International Will and Capacity to Counter Terrorism The Department of State engages diplomatically with for- eign governments and in international and regional fora to accomplish the US Government’s first priority — protect- ing Americans at home and abroad. The Department of State’s diplomatic efforts help build the political will and operational skills of foreign governments to combat terror. Many countries are committed allies in the global war on terrorism. Some, however, need train- ing and resources to develop stronger institutions and capabilities. The Department of State’s counterterrorism efforts are an essential component in the success of US military, law enforcement, intelligence, and financial ac- tivities in the global fight against terrorism. Multilateral and regional organizations are also a key plat- form for developing broad international support for the adoption and implementation of policies, strategies, and “best practices” in combating terrorism and financing of terrorist activities. The Department of State works actively with foreign governments to urge adoption of all 12 inter- national counterterrorism conventions, as well as adherence to and implementation of UNSCR 1373, which imposes binding obligations on all states to suppress and prevent terrorist financing, improve their border controls, enhance information sharing and law enforcement coop- eration, suppress terrorist recruitment, and deny terrorists safe haven. Antiterrorism Assistance Program Ambassador J. Cofer Black, former US State Department Coordinator Congress authorized the Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA) Pro- for Counterterrorism, during a news conference at the IV Regular gram in 1983 as part of a major initiative against international Session of the Organization of American States Inter-American terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Blackwater's Unparalleled Record of Violence in Iraq
    Wheeled Warriors: Explaining Blackwater’s Unparalleled Record of Violence in Iraq by Scott Fitzsimmons Department of Political Science University of British Columbia [email protected] On September 16, 2007, employees of Blackwater, a private security company tasked with protecting U.S. State Department personnel in Iraq, opened fire on pedestrians and motorists in Baghdad’s bustling Nisour Square. This brief but ferocious use of violence against unarmed Iraqi civilians, which came to be known as the “Nisour Square incident,” left 17 civilians dead and two dozen wounded.1 This event was one of the most violent and widely reported on incidents involving Blackwater’s personnel, but it was emblematic of their unparalleled record of violent actions during the Iraq War. In fact, the firm’s personnel fired their weapons during at least 323 incidents in Iraq between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, for an average of two shooting incidents per week. Moreover, despite operating during the same period, performing the same tasks, for the same clients, and facing the same threats in the same general environment, Blackwater’s personnel killed and seriously injured far more people than their counterparts in DynCorp, one of the other major private security companies that provided protective services for the U.S. State Department during this period of the Iraq War. Stunningly, while Blackwater’s personnel inflicted at least 62 deaths and 86 serious injuries during this 1 Blackwater changed its name to Xe in 2009 and to Academi in 2011. However, since the firm is almost invariably referred to by its original name, this study will, whenever possible, do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cost of Post-9/11 Wars: Direct War Deaths in Major War Zones
    Human Cost of Post-9/11 Wars: Direct War Deaths in Major War Zones, Afghanistan and Pakistan (October 2001 – October 2019) Iraq (March 2003 – October 2019); Syria (September 2014-October 2019); Yemen (October 2002-October 2019); and Other 1 Neta C. Crawford and Catherine Lutz2 November 13, 2019 Afghanistan Pakistan Iraq Syria/ISIS3 Yemen4 Other5 Total US Military6 2,2987 —8 4,5729 710 111 136 7,014 US DOD Civilian12 6 15 1 — — 22 US Contractors13 3,814 90 3,588 1714 2 43915 7,950 64,12417 National Military and 64,12417 9,12918 48,337- 51,48320 —21 173,073- Police16 52,33719 177,073 Other Allied Troops22 1,145 — 323 11,00023 12,468 Civilians 43,07424 23,92425 184,382- 49,59127 12,00028 312,971- 207,15626 335,745 Opposition Fighters 42,10029 32,73730 34,806- 67,06532 78,00033 254,708- 39,88131 259,783 8686 Journalists and Media 125 67 86 277 75 31 536 Workers34 Humanitarian/NGO 424 97 63 185 38 807 workers35 TOTAL 157,052 66,064 276,363- 179,424 90,072 575 769,549- 308,212 801,398 TOTAL (rounded to 157,000 66,000 276,000- 179,000 90,000 600 770,000- nearest 1,000) 308,000 801,000 1 This chart tallies direct deaths caused by war violence. It does not include indirect deaths, namely those caused by loss of access to food, water, and/or infrastructure, war-related disease, etc. The numbers included here are approximations based on the reporting of several original data sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S924
    S924 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE March 1, 2021 unanimous consent that the rules of in the subcommittee and shall not be count- IMPEACHMENT procedure of the Committee on Appro- ed for purposes of determining a quorum. Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, just priations for the 117th Congress be f barely a year ago, I was here making a printed in the RECORD. similar statement. Impeachment is one There being no objection, the mate- TRIBUTE TO CHRISTINA NOLAN of the most solemn matters to come rial was ordered to be printed in the Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I would before the Senate, but I worry that it’s RECORD, as follows: like to pay tribute to a great also becoming a common occurrence. SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Before getting into the merits of this Vermonter, Christina Nolan, a most COMMITTEE RULES—117TH CONGRESS impeachment, it is important to reit- dedicated public servant who has I. MEETINGS erate that January 6 was a sad and served as U.S. attorney for the District tragic day for America. I hope we can The Committee will meet at the call of the of Vermont since November 2017. She Chairman. all agree about that. will be resigning her post at the end of What happened here at the Capitol II. QUORUMS this month, 11 years since she first 1. Reporting a bill. A majority of the mem- was completely inexcusable. It was not joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office, but a demonstration of any of our pro- bers must be present for the reporting of a her work and the strong partnerships bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Indien – China – USA: Das Neue Mächtedreieck Asiens
    Indien – China – USA: Das neue Mächtedreieck Asiens Heinrich Kreft1 1 Die Entstehung eines neuen Mächtedreiecks in Asien seit Ende des Kalten Krieges Das Ende des Kalten Krieges führte nicht nur in Europa zu erheblichen politischen Veränderungen und Machtverschiebungen, sondern auch in Asien. Hinzu kam, dass zeitgleich mehrere Länder und Regionen Asiens einen beispiellosen wirtschaftlichen Boom erlebten. 1.1 Der Untergang der Sowjetunion Der wichtigste Einzelfaktor für die Veränderung der politischen Landschaft in Asien war der Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion und das sich daran anschließende Schwin- den des russischen Einflusses in Südasien. Die UdSSR war lange Zeit der wichtigste Verbündete Indiens gewesen, festgeschrieben im indisch-sowjetischen Vertrag von 1971, in dem Moskau Indiens Schutz garantierte. Allerdings wurde dieses Abkom- men bereits Ende der 1980er-Jahre durch die Bemühungen Gorbatschows unter- höhlt, die sowjetischen Beziehungen zu China zu verbessern. Die Russische Förde- ration als Rechtsnachfolger der Sowjetunion war Anfang der 1990er-Jahre kaum noch in der Lage, den sowjetischen Einfluss in Südasien aufrecht zu erhalten. Der ökonomische Niedergang Moskaus ging auch nach dem Zusammenbruch der UdSSR weiter, die russische Marine war nie in der Lage, die Rolle ihrer sowjeti- schen Vorgängerin im Indischen Ozean zu übernehmen. Die indisch-russischen Beziehungen laborieren auch heute noch an den Folgen der Auflösung der Sowjetunion, mit der Indien seinen bis dahin wichtigsten politi- schen und auch ökonomischen Partner verloren
    [Show full text]
  • The Coils of the Anaconda: America's
    THE COILS OF THE ANACONDA: AMERICA’S FIRST CONVENTIONAL BATTLE IN AFGHANISTAN BY C2009 Lester W. Grau Submitted to the graduate degree program in Military History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________ Dr. Theodore A Wilson, Chairperson ____________________________ Dr. James J. Willbanks, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Maria Carlson, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Jacob W. Kipp, Committee Member Date defended: April 27, 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Lester W. Grau certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE COILS OF THE ANACONDA: AMERICA’S FIRST CONVENTIONAL BATTLE IN AFGHANISTAN Committee: ____________________________ Dr. Theodore A Wilson, Chairperson ____________________________ Dr. James J. Willbanks, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Maria Carlson, Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Jacob W. Kipp, Committee Member Date approved: April 27, 2009 ii PREFACE Generals have often been reproached with preparing for the last war instead of for the next–an easy gibe when their fellow-countrymen and their political leaders, too frequently, have prepared for no war at all. Preparation for war is an expensive, burdensome business, yet there is one important part of it that costs little–study. However changed and strange the new conditions of war may be, not only generals, but politicians and ordinary citizens, may find there is much to be learned from the past that can be applied to the future and, in their search for it, that some campaigns have more than others foreshadowed the coming pattern of modern war.1 — Field Marshall Viscount William Slim.
    [Show full text]
  • Pak-Us Strategic Partnership Amidst Conflicting Approaches Towards Militancy (2005-2015)
    PAK-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AMIDST CONFLICTING APPROACHES TOWARDS MILITANCY (2005-2015) ASIF SALIM Ph.D (Scholar) DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR SESSION: 2014-15 PAK-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AMIDST CONFLICTING APPROACHES TOWARDS MILITANCY (2005-2015) Thesis submitted to the Department of Political Science, University of Peshawar, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE MARCH, 2018 i ABSTRACT International system based on anarchic theories and approaches in which power politics and statism are the basic components which play vital role when states conduct the relations with one another. The power of the state can be appraised through its ability to protect its national interests at any cost. States in relation with equal strength can easily protect their national interests but when the small and big state interests are clashed with each other, double standers and distrust take birth. Pakistan and the US relation is the best example of the realistic ideas in which it can be safely quoted „There is no permanent friendship and enmity. There are interests that decide the faith of friendship and enmity‟. After the partition of subcontinent civil and military leadership deviated from the golden principles of the founder (Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah) and joined the western bloc. America warmly welcomed Pakistan as the US needed partner in South and Southwest Asia and Asia Pacific to counter the spread of communistic ideologies in the region. From the day one the leader ship of Pakistan was not concerned with the communism but interested to acquire economic and military assistance from the US so as to keep balance with India.
    [Show full text]