DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rise of the Bolsheviks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rise of the Bolsheviks The Russian Revolution, 1919: the Rise of the Bolsheviks Table of Contents Page No. 1. Letter from Director 2. Letter from Chair 3. Introduction 4. House of Romanov 5. Revolution of 1905 6. Stolypin Reforms 7. Duma 8. Issues plaguing Russia 9. Ideology of Bolsheviks 10.Russian Revolution of 1917 11.Conclusion and current scenario 12.Character Bios 13.Timeline of Russian History Letter from Director Dear Comrades, Greetings! My name is Dhruv Tyagi, and it is my distinct honor to serve as your Director for The Russian Revolution: the Rise of the Bolsheviks. I am currently a freshman majoring in Physics and minoring in Political Science. I was born in Bangalore, India, but I had always dreamed of coming to the US for my undergraduate education. When I am not sleep deprived from Model UN, you can find me on a soccer field, in the gym, rapping, or watching my favorite genre of movies: horror! This year we will be simulating the Bolsheviks cabinet in 1919. I am extremely excited for this committee as we will be taking a trip back in time to one of history’s most monumental periods that would change the world forever. I await to see your skills of creativity, rhetoric, diplomacy, and subversion on display. As Bolsheviks, you wield enormous power and influence in deciding the fate of Russia and her people. I hope you will not disappoint the millions of Russians dreaming of a greater future for their country. My role as your director is to ensure that MUNI is the best Model UN conference you have ever attended; your role as delegates is to soak in as much as possible from this conference. While awards are important, I want you to recognize that MUN holds so much more value than just a certificate or trophy in a cabinet. MUN is not merely a competition but an avenue for fostering new friendships, gaining invaluable knowledge, and most importantly enjoying yourself. I sincerely hope all of you will aim to at least take these things away from MUNI if not anything else. This background guide is by no means exhaustive; this should serve as the foundation for your further research. A great delegate is one who positively influences committee and helps move committee forward. A strong delegate is sure not only in voicing their opinion but also listening respectfully to others. Being involved both in-room through your speeches and out-room through your crisis notes is essential if you wish to be an impactful delegate. I understand that this may be your first time in a crisis committee, so please do not hesitate to reach out to my email [email protected] for any queries or if you just want to ​ ​ introduce yourself! Crisis committees often get a bad rap for being challenging, but they are the most exciting and challenging committees that MUN has to offer. I wish you all the best, and слава маме россии! ​ Sincerely, Dhruv Tyagi Director of the Bolsheviks Letter from the Chair Dear Comrades, Hello! My name is Carter Smith, and I have the honor of being the Head Chair of the Russian Revolution crisis at MUNI XXV. Although I’m a freshman, this will be my sixth year participating in Model United Nations in some capacity. I have chaired several conferences in my home state of Tennessee, and I look forward to the exhilarating weekend of debate ahead of us. I am currently majoring in electrical engineering; however, I will be transferring to Econometrics next semester to fully embrace Model UN and (hopefully) law school in the future. When I’m not preparing for Model UN, I find time to pursue my love for consuming copious amounts of coffee, watching Chelsea lose in the Premier League, programming, and listening to Kid Cudi and Kanye. Narrowing down my list of favorite shows is difficult, but Seinfeld, Mindhunter, and Black Mirror would definitely be my top three. I eagerly await the fierce debate and treachery which will most certainly befall the Bolshevik cabinet while in session. All committees at MUNI challenge you to think critically and to thoroughly understand your country/character’s position, but I hope that the wide reaching effects of this crisis encourages every delegate to go above and beyond in their research and debate. As high-ranking members of the Bolshevik party, you must solve the most challenging and complex issues facing Russia all while a power vacuum emerges. Issues such as internal dissent, economic stagnation, and the Great War loom on the horizon for any government which will form from the ashes of Tsarist Russia. The crisis at hand presents every delegate the opportunity to shape Russia how they deem fit through the tools at their disposal. Comrades, if you have any questions or concerns, please contact me using the information I have provided below. Вперёд, к победе, коммунизма! Sincerely, Carter Smith Head Chair of Bolsheviks Introduction There is perhaps no phenomenon in global history as monumental and significant as the Russian Revolution: it would lay the foundation for the emergence of communism as a competing ideology to capitalism which hitherto had remained unchallenged. The rise of communism would lead to the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and it would play a crucial role in shaping the modern world through the Cold War against the United States of America. However, the journey to the zenith of global power would not be a straightforward one which would begin with the Bolshevik takeover and the end of the Tsarist rule in 1918. Our committee will be simulating the cabinet of the prominent Bolsheviks in the year 1919 after the execution of Tsar Nicholas II and his family. The Bolsheviks have been in a contentious position of power for nearly a year, but our ambition is to solidify our hold on Russia and cement Communism’s place as the only ideology appropriate for Russia and her people. Notwithstanding the gains the Bolsheviks have made recently, this will not be a simple task: there are several obstacles to Bolshevik rule in the form of the Provisional Government, the Mensheviks, the Socialist Revolutionary Party, the anarchists, and more who do not wish to see the Bolsheviks at the helm of the upheaval that Russian society is undergoing. Furthermore, the Bolsheviks must seek to solve the problems that plague the common people of Russia. Having utilized the slogan of “Peace, Land and Bread” in order to win the support of the populous, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, must devise plans to solve these issues.1 Simply put, Russia has a herculean task ahead of her if she is to overcome the hold of the bourgeoisie, but if there were to be solutions to the current conundrum, the only ones who are capable of bringing them to light are the Bolsheviks. Using our resources, powers, and support, we must seek to achieve our aspirations through cooperation and pragmatism. Удачи Bolsheviks, the fate of Russia is in your hands. House of Romanov In order to fully comprehend the Russian Revolution and its consequences, it is important to first understand the underlying history of Russia and the events that led up to the revolution. Russia had always been an ethnically diverse country – a fact that added to its uniqueness but also complicated matters for any ruler. The most prominent monarchs belonged to the Romanov 1 https://www.johndclare.net/Russ5.htm ​ family, and they ruled over Russia as Tsars for over 300 years.2 Romanov rule began in 1613 with the election of Mikhail Romanov by the National Assembly.3 Under the Romanov’s tsardom, Russia would undergo its largest territorial expansion transforming a landlocked state into one of Europe’s largest empires.4 During the reign of Peter the Great (1696-1725), Russia and its culture would welcome several new changes, and Peter would overrule the country’s medieval aristocracy in an attempt to revitalize Russia’s standing globally. Peter the Great was responsible for the creation of a navy, the establishment of a reorganized Russian army in accordance with the standards adopted by Western countries, secularized schools, and the administration of greater control over the reactionary Orthodox Church. Peter was greatly influenced by European culture and set up the city of St. Petersburg, which he made his new capital, deemed the country’s “window into Europe.” He was a visionary and an excellent diplomat, and he appointed a Russian Senate who’s work it was to regulate all branches of administration and formulate Russian foreign policy. However, Peter the Great enacted reforms that were accompanied by high taxes resulting in several revolts among citizens; however, these were quickly suppressed by Peter who developed a reputation of being cruel and tyrannical. Catherine II, also known as Catherine the Great, was another exemplary monarch who served as Russia’s longest female ruler. She faced more than a dozen uprisings during her reign, but she was able to put them down without losing her hold on the throne. Ironically, she arose to the throne as a result of a coup that caused her husband Peter III to abdicate. She was a dedicated patron of the arts, and her reign also enjoyed Russian adoption of Western European culture and philosophies. 5However, like her predecessors, Catherine II allowed the unjust practice of serfdom to carry on, and she did very little to alleviate the lot of her people. The abolishment of serfdom finally came in 1861 during the reign of Alexander II through the Emancipation Reform.6 This reform freed the peasants of their bondage to one piece of land, and it enabled them to move around freely while purchasing land if they wished to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War Communism and Bolshevik Ideals" Is Devoted to a Case I N Point: the Dispute Over the Motivation of War Communism (The Name Given T O
    TITLE : WAR COMMUNISM AND BOLSHEVIK IDEAL S AUTHOR : LARS T . LIH THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEA N RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : ' CONTRACTOR : Wellesley Colleg e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Lars T. Li h COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-1 9 DATE : January 25, 199 4 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f information Act 5 U.S. C. 552, or other applicable law. The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (th e Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in th e report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This interpretive analysis of War Communism (1918-1921) may be of interest to those wh o anticipate further decline in the Russian economy and contemplate the possible purposes an d policies of a more authoritarian regime .
    [Show full text]
  • The Suppression of Jewish Culture by the Soviet Union's Emigration
    \\server05\productn\B\BIN\23-1\BIN104.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-JUL-05 11:26 A STRUGGLE TO PRESERVE ETHNIC IDENTITY: THE SUPPRESSION OF JEWISH CULTURE BY THE SOVIET UNION’S EMIGRATION POLICY BETWEEN 1945-1985 I. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STATUS OF JEWS IN THE SOVIET SOCIETY BEFORE AND AFTER THE WAR .................. 159 R II. BEFORE THE BORDERS WERE CLOSED: SOVIET EMIGRATION POLICY UNDER STALIN (1945-1947) ......... 163 R III. CLOSING OF THE BORDER: CESSATION OF JEWISH EMIGRATION UNDER STALIN’S REGIME .................... 166 R IV. THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES: SOVIET EMIGRATION POLICY UNDER KHRUSHCHEV AND BREZHNEV .................... 168 R V. CONCLUSION .............................................. 174 R I. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STATUS OF JEWS IN THE SOVIET SOCIETY BEFORE AND AFTER THE WAR Despite undergoing numerous revisions, neither the Soviet Constitu- tion nor the Soviet Criminal Code ever adopted any laws or regulations that openly or implicitly permitted persecution of or discrimination against members of any minority group.1 On the surface, the laws were always structured to promote and protect equality of rights and status for more than one hundred different ethnic groups. Since November 15, 1917, a resolution issued by the Second All-Russia Congress of the Sovi- ets called for the “revoking of all and every national and national-relig- ious privilege and restriction.”2 The Congress also expressly recognized “the right of the peoples of Russia to free self-determination up to seces- sion and the formation of an independent state.” Identical resolutions were later adopted by each of the 15 Soviet Republics. Furthermore, Article 124 of the 1936 (Stalin-revised) Constitution stated that “[f]reedom of religious worship and freedom of anti-religious propaganda is recognized for all citizens.” 3 1 See generally W.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Revolution: a Wider Perspective
    - THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION: A WIDER PERSPECTIVE PREFACE to the Source Collection on the Russian Revolution This is a collection of sources provided by members of the Euroclio network and curated by three members of the Historiana team. It Insert Source here: is not a comprehensive overview of the Russian Revolution. Its purpose is to provide some insights into how politicians, diplomats, senior military officers, other officials, revolutionaries, eye witnesses, bystanders, newspaper editors and journalists, ordinary people and even children perceived some of the key events in Russia from January 1917 through to December 1922. We hope that this transnational and multiperspective collection will widen students’ understanding of what happened in Russia in those critical years. The sources have been provided by history teachers and historians from 13 countries, including the Russian Federation, neighbouring states that in 1917 were part of the Russian Empire, states that were then allies or enemies of Russia and even states which were neutral non-combatants in 1917. To obtain these sources the contributors turned to their own national digital and physical archives. Where necessary, contributors summarised texts in English. Painting by British artist David For EUROCLIO this was a pilot experiment in collecting historical Jagger, entitled The Bolshevik sources and we are very grateful to everyone who took part. We (1918). The image combines the think the experiment was successful and EUROCLIO will be planning features of several Bolshevik further crowd-sourcing of collections on other significant moments leaders. and developments in world history in the future. Source: Canadian War Museum Bob Stradling, Louise Sträuli and Giulia Rossi Public Domain Summer 2019 THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT This collection is divided into four Introductionsections.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus from Compulsory Collectivism 1861-1914
    Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus From Compulsory Collectivism 1861-1914 Sztern, Sylvia 2017 Document Version: Peer reviewed version (aka post-print) Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Sztern, S. (2017). Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus From Compulsory Collectivism 1861- 1914. (2017 ed.). Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 Creative Commons License: Unspecified General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Russia on the Move The Railroads and the Exodus from Compulsory Collectivism 1861–1914 Sylvia Sztern DOCTORAL DISSERTATION by due permission of the School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison
    WELFARE REFORMS IN POST-SOVIET STATES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIAL BENEFITS REFORM IN RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN by ELENA MALTSEVA A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Elena Maltseva (2012) Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: A Comparison of Social Benefits Reform in Russia and Kazakhstan Elena Maltseva Doctor of Philosophy Political Science University of Toronto (2012) Abstract: Concerned with the question of why governments display varying degrees of success in implementing social reforms, (judged by their ability to arrive at coherent policy outcomes), my dissertation aims to identify the most important factors responsible for the stagnation of social benefits reform in Russia, as opposed to its successful implementation in Kazakhstan. Given their comparable Soviet political and economic characteristics in the immediate aftermath of Communism’s disintegration, why did the implementation of social benefits reform succeed in Kazakhstan, but largely fail in Russia? I argue that although several political and institutional factors did, to a certain degree, influence the course of social benefits reform in these two countries, their success or failure was ultimately determined by the capacity of key state actors to frame the problem and form an effective policy coalition that could further the reform agenda despite various political and institutional obstacles and socioeconomic challenges. In the case of Kazakhstan, the successful implementation of the social benefits reform was a result of a bold and skillful endeavour by Kazakhstani authorities, who used the existing conditions to justify the reform initiative and achieve the reform’s original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • New Documents on Mongolia and the Cold War
    Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Issue 16 New Documents on Mongolia and the Cold War Translation and Introduction by Sergey Radchenko1 n a freezing November afternoon in Ulaanbaatar China and Russia fell under the Mongolian sword. However, (Ulan Bator), I climbed the Zaisan hill on the south- after being conquered in the 17th century by the Manchus, Oern end of town to survey the bleak landscape below. the land of the Mongols was divided into two parts—called Black smoke from gers—Mongolian felt houses—blanketed “Outer” and “Inner” Mongolia—and reduced to provincial sta- the valley; very little could be discerned beyond the frozen tus. The inhabitants of Outer Mongolia enjoyed much greater Tuul River. Chilling wind reminded me of the cold, harsh autonomy than their compatriots across the border, and after winter ahead. I thought I should have stayed at home after all the collapse of the Qing dynasty, Outer Mongolia asserted its because my pen froze solid, and I could not scribble a thing right to nationhood. Weak and disorganized, the Mongolian on the documents I carried up with me. These were records religious leadership appealed for help from foreign countries, of Mongolia’s perilous moves on the chessboard of giants: including the United States. But the first foreign troops to its strategy of survival between China and the Soviet Union, appear were Russian soldiers under the command of the noto- and its still poorly understood role in Asia’s Cold War. These riously cruel Baron Ungern who rode past the Zaisan hill in the documents were collected from archival depositories and pri- winter of 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanov News Новости Романовых
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №114 September 2017 Emperor Nicholas I. Watercolour by Alexander I. Klünder Monument to Emperor Nicholas I unveiled in Czech Republic September 19.TASS - A monument to Emperor Nicholas I (1825-1855) was opened in the spa town of Teplice in the north of the Czech Republic. This was announced by Consul-General of the Consulate General of the Russian Federation in Karlovy Vary (West Bohemia) Igor Melnik. "The monument to Nicholas I was erected in the very centre of Teplice next to the monuments of Peter the Great and Alexander I," he stressed. "This idea supported by local authorities, was conceived long ago, but was postponed, primarily because of the lack of necessary funds." Monuments to Russian autocrats in Teplice were created by People's Artist of Russia Vladimir Surovtsev. The patrons of the project are the organization of Russian compatriots in the Czech Republic "The Ark-Arch" and the General Consulate of the Russian Federation in Karlovy Vary. Sovereigns from the Romanov dynasty, actively implementing the idea of uniting the Slavs under the sceptre of mighty Russia on the international arena, have forever entered the history of Teplice. The Grand Duke and the future Emperor of Russia Nicholas I twice visited this city: in 1815 at the age of 19, and in 1818, when he turned 22. He took part in laying the foundation and then opening a monument to Russian soldiers who died for Europe's freedom in the struggle against Napoleon. The elder brother of Nicholas I, Emperor Alexander I, arrived in Teplice during the foreign campaigns of the Russian Imperial Army during the Napoleonic wars in 1813.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 23: War and Revolution, 1914-1919
    The Twentieth- Century Crisis 1914–1945 The eriod in Perspective The period between 1914 and 1945 was one of the most destructive in the history of humankind. As many as 60 million people died as a result of World Wars I and II, the global conflicts that began and ended this era. As World War I was followed by revolutions, the Great Depression, totalitarian regimes, and the horrors of World War II, it appeared to many that European civilization had become a nightmare. By 1945, the era of European domination over world affairs had been severely shaken. With the decline of Western power, a new era of world history was about to begin. Primary Sources Library See pages 998–999 for primary source readings to accompany Unit 5. ᮡ Gate, Dachau Memorial Use The World History Primary Source Document Library CD-ROM to find additional primary sources about The Twentieth-Century Crisis. ᮣ Former Russian pris- oners of war honor the American troops who freed them. 710 “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.” —Winston Churchill International ➊ ➋ Peacekeeping Until the 1900s, with the exception of the Seven Years’ War, never ➌ in history had there been a conflict that literally spanned the globe. The twentieth century witnessed two world wars and numerous regional conflicts. As the scope of war grew, so did international commitment to collective security, where a group of nations join together to promote peace and protect human life. 1914–1918 1919 1939–1945 World War I League of Nations World War II is fought created to prevent wars is fought ➊ Europe The League of Nations At the end of World War I, the victorious nations set up a “general associa- tion of nations” called the League of Nations, which would settle interna- tional disputes and avoid war.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin: Russia's Choice, Second Edition
    Putin The second edition of this extremely well-received political biography of Vladimir Putin builds on the strengths of the previous edition to provide the most detailed and nuanced account of the man, his politics and his pro- found influence on Russian politics, foreign policy and society. New to this edition: Analysis of Putin’s second term as President. More biographical information in the light of recent research. Detailed discussion of changes to the policy process and the elites around Putin. Developments in state–society relations including the conflicts with oli- garchs such as Khodorkovsky. Review of changes affecting the party system and electoral legislation, including the development of federalism in Russia. Details on economic performance under Putin, including more discus- sion of the energy sector and pipeline politics. Russia’s relationship with Nato after the ‘big-bang’ enlargement, EU– Russian relations after enlargement and Russia’s relations with other post- Soviet states. The conclusion brings us up to date with debates over the question of democracy in Russia today, and the nature of Putin’s leadership and his place in the world. Putin: Russia’s choice is essential reading for all scholars and students of Russian politics. Richard Sakwa is Professor of Politics at the University of Kent, UK. Putin Russia’s choice Second edition Richard Sakwa First edition published 2004 Second edition, 2008 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Steps for Success 2020
    Steps for Success 2020 Independence: Literacy: Equipment: Attitude: Resilience: Numeracy Mr M Koza, Assistant Headteacher WELCOME Independence: Literacy: Equipment: Attitude: Resilience: Numeracy HOW TO REVISE EFFECTIVELY… Independence: Literacy: Equipment: Attitude: Resilience: Numeracy Location Information Memorising Scheduling Revision Environment Grigori Rasputin 1869 - 1916 Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin (21 January 1869 – 30 December 1916) was a Russian mystic and advisor to the Romanovs, the Russian imperial family. Rasputin was born a peasant in the small village of Pokrovskoye, along the Tura River in the immense West Siberian Plain. Rasputin was born on 21 January and was baptised the following day, the feast day of Gregory of Nyssa. When he was around the age of eighteen, Rasputin spent three months in the famous Verkhoturye monastery, maybe as a penance for theft. Not far from the monastery, Rasputin visited a holy man named Makariy, whose hut was situated nearby. Makariy had an enormous influence on Rasputin, and then later modelled himself largely on him. Rasputin gave up drinking alcohol and eating meat. His experience there, combined with a reported vision of the Virgin Mary on his return, turned him towards the life of a religious mystic and wanderer. He was not a monk, nor was he ever officially connected to the Orthodox Church, but was considered a "strannik" (or pilgrim) wandering from cloister to cloister. He was regarded as a starets, an "elder", a title usually reserved for monk-confessors by those believing him to be a psychic and mystic healer. Rasputin was obsessed by religion and impressed many people with his knowledge and ability to explain the Bible in an uncomplicated way.
    [Show full text]
  • Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’S Only First Lady
    Outraging the People by Stepping out of the Shadows Gender roles, the ‘feminine ideal’ and gender discourse in the Soviet Union and Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’s only First Lady. Noraly Terbijhe Master Thesis MA Russian & Eurasian Studies Leiden University January 2020, Leiden Everywhere in the civilised world, the position, the rights and obligations of a wife of the head of state are more or less determined. For instance, I found out that the President’s wife in the White House has special staff to assist her in preforming her duties. She even has her own ‘territory’ and office in one wing of the White House. As it turns out, I as the First Lady had only one tradition to be proud of, the lack of any right to an official public existence.1 Raisa Maximovna Gorbacheva (1991) 1 Translated into English from Russian. From: Raisa Gorbacheva, Ya Nadeyus’ (Moscow 1991) 162. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Gender roles and discourse in Russia and the USSR ................................................................. 17 The supportive comrade ................................................................................................................. 19 The hardworking mother ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]