DOCSLIB.ORG

Hoteo River Catchment: Environment and Socio-Economic Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hoteo River Catchment: Environment and Socio-Economic Review Hoteo River Catchment: Environment and Socio-economic Review August 2014 Technical Report 2014/021 Auckland Council Technical Report 2014/021 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-1-927302-31-6 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927302-32-3 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel using the Panel’s terms of reference Submitted for review on 6 June 2014 Review completed on 8 August 2014 Reviewed by two reviewers Landcare Research review by Andrew Fenemor, Scientist and Programme Leader, Soils and Landscapes Team Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Regan Solomon Manager – Research Investigations and Monitoring Unit Date: 8 August 2014 Recommended citation: Hart, G and Scott, K (2014). Hoteo River catchment: environment and socio-economic review. Prepared for Auckland Council by Landcare. Auckland Council technical report, TR2014/021 © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Hoteo River Catchment: Environment and Socio-economic Review Georgina Hart Kathryn Scott Landcare Research Landcare Research contract report LC1761 Executive summary Project and client The Hoteo catchment, one of the Auckland Council Sustainable Catchment Programme’s (SCP) rural catchments, has been prioritised for management with a focus on community initiatives to restore ecosystems in and around streams and rivers to limit erosion and sedimentation and to improve water quality. The Hoteo catchment has been selected as a priority catchment primarily because of the threat posed by river sedimentation to a key snapper breeding ground – sea grass beds situated in the Kaipara Harbour close to the mouth of the Hoteo River. This report has been prepared for Auckland Council as part of the SCP. The aim of this project was to review and collate available environmental and socio- economic information for the Hoteo catchment; assess current and potential future issues for the catchment; and consider key knowledge gaps and future needs for sustainable catchment management. This review is designed to inform 10-year rural plans and 1 to 3- year project plans being developed under the SCP. This report establishes the current biophysical, cultural, social, and demographic conditions in the catchment, and aims to identify current and future issues and key knowledge gaps in terms of biophysical and socio-economic information regarding the Hoteo catchment. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping and combinatorial analysis have formed an important part of investigations underpinning this report. Background description: Hoteo catchment Set within the Auckland regional context, the Hoteo catchment is a 405km2, geographically diverse rural catchment predominantly in pastoral agriculture and exotic forestry that drains to the Kaipara Harbour. The original land cover of the catchment has been highly modified. Loss of indigenous biodiversity has occurred as forests have been cleared and wetlands drained. Remaining streams, rivers, wetlands and forest provide critical habitat for indigenous plants and animals, some of which are regionally or nationally threatened. Hoteo landscapes also provide for multiple recreational uses. The catchment has very low population density and a small resident population of around 2500. Most catchment residents are self-employed in the agricultural sector, with a smaller number working in a range of service sectors, mostly in Wellsford. Wellsford is the only town in the area, of which part falls within the Hoteo catchment. The land’s productive capacity underpins the local rural economy. Traditional pastoral agriculture in sheep, beef, and dairying dominates the landscape. More recently, there has been an increase in recreation and tourism sector activities in the catchment and rural subdivision for lifestyle blocks has increased population in the catchment away from Wellsford. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Hoteo River catchment: environment and socio-economic review i Key issues and knowledge gaps Degradation of water quality and soil quality, loss of biodiversity, flood risk, risks to cultural heritage, and a number of social and cultural issues have been identified for the Hoteo catchment. Knowledge gaps have been identified in the areas of water quality, indigenous biodiversity, cultural heritage, community knowledge and land use and management. Recommendations The following summary of recommendations has been developed in collaboration with SCP staff at Auckland Council, suggesting options for addressing identified issues and filling knowledge gaps. 1. Governance • Collaborate with relevant governance bodies of the Kaipara and Hoteo catchments • Acknowledge and ensure management is consistent with relevant Treaty settlement legislation • Identify and integrate with other work steams and projects in the Hoteo catchment • Include and respond to the relevant policies and strategies that relate to environment, land use biodiversity etc. 2. Erosion and sediment management • Develop more comprehensive estimates of sediment yields and sources • Target intervention for reducing sediment yield along the lower reaches of the Hoteo River and associated steep pasture land, and build on the work of Buikema (2012) to prioritise areas for riparian management • Investigate the risks of algal proliferation that could result from reducing sediment levels in the river 3. Indigenous biodiversity • Support and/or establish work to identify inanga spawning grounds and opportunities to protect and enhance them (working with the relevant biodiversity staff at Auckland Council) • Incorporate indigenous biodiversity management into sediment management programmes (e.g. riparian management could be designed to also enable protection of inanga spawning grounds; stabilisation plantings could include native species) 4. Cultural heritage and socio-economic • Establish a project that creates opportunities for mana whenua and residents to document and share their stories, and draw on this knowledge in catchment management and conservation efforts • Assist with the prioritisation and/or resourcing of an archaeological survey for cultural heritage sites in this area (working with the relevant cultural heritage team staff at Auckland Council) • Conduct or commission work to identify opportunities for diversified land use activities in the catchment, and investigate ways the SCP could support the catchment community to implement the more sustainable options __________________________________________________________________________________________ Hoteo River catchment: environment and socio-economic review ii Table of Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Sustainable Catchments Programme for the Hoteo catchment .................................................. 1 1.2 Hoteo catchment ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Biophysical review ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Socio-demographic, cultural and planning context reviews ........................................................ 5 3.0 Biophysical environment .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Geology and soils ........................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Slope and elevation ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Erosion .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested Report
    Reader’s guide To the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested report As with all regional and district plan reviews and plan changes, the Resource Management Act (RMA) requires the council to prepare a report summarising all the decisions requested. The report for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) will be the largest of its kind since the RMA came into effect in 1991, containing more than 93,600 individual requests from more than 9,400 submissions. The information below outlines how the submissions were summarised and provides guidance on how to navigate the Summary of Decisions Requested (SDR) report which is available online at www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/unitaryplan and in hard copy at selected Auckland Council Libraries, service centres and local board offices. 1. Content of the summary of decisions requested report The report is made up of concise summaries of the decisions requested in submissions. The report is not intended to be a summary of the submissions in their entirety and does not include reasons for the request or other supporting material included in the submissions. The original submission should be referred to if you are seeking to make a further submission, or to fully understand the issues raised by a submitter. A number of submissions discuss provisions of the PAUP or other information without providing specific references. No attempt has been made to source these references, or obtain clarification. Any clarification needed should be sourced directly from the submitter. In some cases, the decisions requested by submitters were unclear. Any inferences made are identified by the use of square brackets.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Rodney Local Board
    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Rodney Local Board will be held on: Date: Wednesday 15 July 2020 Time: 3.00pm Meeting Room: Te Whare Oranga ō Parakai Venue: 5 Rere Place Parakai Rodney Local Board OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Phelan Pirrie Deputy Chairperson Beth Houlbrooke Members Brent Bailey Steve Garner Danielle Hancock Tim Holdgate Louise Johnston Vicki Kenny Colin Smith (Quorum 5 members) Robyn Joynes Democracy Advisor - Rodney 10 July 2020 Contact Telephone: +64 212447174 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson. Board Member Organisation Position Brent Bailey Royal NZ Yacht Squadron Member Steven Garner Warkworth Tennis and Squash Club President Sandspit Yacht Club Member Warkworth Gamefish Club Member Louise Johnston Blackbridge Environmental Protection Treasurer Society Vicki Kenny International Working Holidays Ltd Director/Owner/CEO Nannies Abroad Ltd Director/Owner/CEO Waitemata Riding Club Member Treasurer National Party Helensville Electorate Danielle Hancock Kaukapakapa Residents and Ratepayers Member Association Pest Free Kaukapakapa Pest Free Coordinator New Zealand Biosecurity Services Limited Operations Manager Tim Holdgate Landowners Contractors Protection Vice Chairman Association
    [Show full text]
  • RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY Adopted September 2010
    RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY Adopted September 2010 RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL RURAL STRATEGY - Consultation Draft May 2010 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. CONSULTATION 3. BASIS OF THE RURAL STRATEGY 3.1 Reasons for the Rural Strategy 3.2 Purpose 3.3 Process 3.4 Background Research 3.5 Influences 3.6 Initial Consultation Feedback 3.7 Key Focus Issues 4. STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO THE ISSUES 4.1 Achieving Strategic Imperatives 4.2 Making the Strategy Work 5. SPECIFIC INITIATIVES 5.1 Tailored Management Approaches 5.2 Facilitating A Sustainable Rural Economy 5.3 Improving Development Location 5.4 Subdivision And Natural Area Protection 5.5 Protecting Important Landscapes 5.6 Rural Rates Policy 5.7 Rural Infrastructure 5.8 Restoring and Protecting Biodiversity 5.9 Maori Owned Land 6. WHERE TO FROM HERE 7. APPENDIX – Adopted September 2010 Rodney District Rural Strategy 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Strategic Imperatives The Rural Strategy is a long term (25 year) outcome focused strategy, the purpose The process of developing responses has identified a number of “strategic of which is to: imperatives”. These imperatives are outcomes that the Rural Strategy responses (in addressing the focus issues) are driving towards: foster a sustainable rural economy; protect and enhance rural landscapes and rural character; Viable productive land – for farming, horticulture viticulture, forestry and improve rural development outcomes for communities and the other primary production enterprises environment; Quality landscapes – a country look
    [Show full text]
  • Warkworth to Wellsford Operational Water — Design Technical Report
    :_ . '.',| 1;” I” $ ~ . ‘ firs: wet? .I III".- _ I. I. I. 1'f‘le . 151...!“ '-.r -....'_i ' ' - I I. I . .' . '4 .- 1 fi' II II.- I . A H I I'.‘ a.‘- ': ' I Ii" L'. 1‘); :Ii. :1! . 3"": i" h ll ' .+ - .a'. .- 1": .--' - i ‘ ' ' Warkworth to Wellsford Operational Water — Design Technical Report July 2019 Final Tony Cain Tim Fisher Brad Nobilo 05/07/2019 Tegan Blount GLOSSARY AND DEFINED TERMS Refer to the Water Assessment Report for a master glossary and defined terms table. 5? JACOBS [l LE1? Tonkin +Taylar TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Project description Purpose and scope of this report Overview of operational water management systems U'lNI—‘H EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Catchment description Existing infrastructure Topography |—\|—\ Geology I—‘O©\l\l OPERATIONAL WATER — DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND REQUIREMENTS Operational water design philosophy 14 Stormwater design guidelines and standards 15 Operational water management 16 Specific design requirements 17 OPERATIONAL WATER - DESIGN APPROACH 23 Operational water design 23 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 38 .1 Water quality 38 U'IU'IU1 .2 Water quantity 38 APPENDIX A: WETLAND DESIGN — SUMMARY TABLE 40 APPENDIX B: CULVERT DESIGN — SUMMARY TABLE 42 JACOBS W Tonkin +Taylor 1 INTRODUCTION The Warkworth to Wellsford Project (the Project) crosses the Mahurangi River, Hoteo River and tributaries of the Oruawharo River to the north of Auckland. These freshwater environments drain into the Mahurangi Harbour and Kaipara Harbour. This report has been prepared to support the Water Assessment Report for the Project, and provides details of the operational stormwater management and other operational phase mitigation by design. The Project involves the construction, operation and maintenance of a new four lane state highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967
    Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 PREFACE This booklet is prepared as a Memorial to those who carried on the work of the Methodist Church in the Port Albert Circuit. Ministers, Home Missionaries and their wives; Students and Local Preachers, Youth Workers and all who have helped construct and maintain the buildings. Many whose names are not mentioned in this short history have contributed to and shared the Faith. Our especial thanks to Rev. E. W. Hames for preparing and writing this brief account. H. Neal and L. W. Bennett for Church Trust. "THE BEST OF ALL IS GOD IS WITH US." To give and give and give again What God has given thee To spend thyself nor count the cost To serve right gloriously The God who gave all worlds that are And all that are to be. (Studdart Kennedy) Port Albert Methodist Church 1862-1967 Methodism in Port Albert It should not be necessary to tell again at length the 'story of the Albertland settlements. This has been done fully and ably in THE ALBERTLANDERS by Sir Henry Brett and Henry Hook, published 1927, and in the Albertland Centennial Booklet, 1962. The founders of the district planned to do on a smaller scale on behalf of English Nonconformists what had already been accomplished by the Scottish Free Church in Otago and by the Anglicans in Canterbury. It must not be forgotten that at this date the Nonconformists were still second-class citizens in England. Those who joined the Association were fired by the ambition to acquire broad acres in a country where they might hope to be free from the disabilities that still attached to them in the land of their birth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1502 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 55
    1502 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 55 Taihape, Town Hall. Rodney Electoral District­ Taoroa Public Hall. Ahuroa Public School. Tiriraukawa Public School. Albany Public School. Tokorangi Public School. Albany South, Mr M. J. Sheffield's Garage. Upper Tutaenui Public Hall. Algie's Bay, Store. Utiku Public School. Ararua Public School. Waitohi Public School. Brighams Creek, Presbyterian Church Hall. Waituna West Public School. Browns Bay West, 884 East Coast Road, Mr R. B. K. Camp- bell's Garage. Coatesville Public School. Dairy Flat Public School. Glorit Public School. Greenhithe Public School. Hakaru, Library Hall. Helensville, War Memorial Hall. Remuera Electoral District- Herald Island, Fire Station. Green Lane, Great South Road and Green Lane West corner, Hobsonville Public Hall. Congregational Church Hall. Huapai Public School. Meadowbank- Hukatere Public School. Meadowbank Road, Community Hall. Kaipara Flats Public School. Meadowbank Road, St. Chads Hall. Kaiwaka, Community Centre War Memorial Hall. Waiatarua Road, Meadowbank School. Kakanui Maori School. One Tree Hill- Kaukapakapa Public School. Gardner Road, Epsom Presbyterian Church Hall. Kawau Island, Yacht Club's Clubhouse. Green Lane West and Wheturangi Road, Cornwall Park, Kourawhero Hall. District School Hall. Kumeu, Baptist Church Youth Club Hall. Green Lane West, Cornwall Hospital X-ray Hall. Leigh Public School. Green Lane West, Green Lane and National Women's Makarau Public Hall. Hospitals. Mangawhai Public School. Ngaire Avenue, Gospel Hall Schoolroom. Mangawhai Heads, Church of Christ Youth Camp. Ranfurly Road East, St. George's Hall. Manly, Methodist Church Hall. Remuera- Mareretu, Mr G. W. Burke's Garage. 61 Arney Road, Mr J. L. Innes's Garage. Marohemo Hall. Ascot Avenue and St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand: Auckland Conservancy
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand AUCKLAND CONSERVANCY Whangapoua Wetlands (6) Location: 36o09'S, 175o25'E. On the northeast side of Great Barrier Island in the Hauraki Gulf, North Island. Area: c.340 ha. Altitude: Sea level. Overview: The Whangapoua wetlands include Whangapoua Estuary, an associated sandspit and an adjoining area of freshwater wetland. Also included in the wetland area is the Mabey Farm stream which was formerly part of the Whangapoua wetland before Mabeys Road was formed. The estuary shows little sign of modification, and it is partly for this reason that it has been classified as having outstanding values as a wildlife habitat. The importance of this estuary is based on the whole ecosystem rather than individual species, although it is home to some threatened species. The wildlife in the Whangapoua wetlands is the most diverse on the island, with some 36 species of native and introduced birds, one of the most important being the Brown Teal Anas aucklandica chlorotis, which is one of New Zealand's most endangered waterfowl species. Physical features: Inland are volcanic rocks of andesitic and rhyolitic composition. The land to the north of Whangapoua is a basement of greywacke and argillite; around the estuary and the Okiwi Basin are alluvial deposits of Quaternary age, and the shore is derived from sediments from the local catchments. The sandspit and the beach are made up of sands accumulated in the last 6000 years after the last glaciation. Water quality in the estuary is high, and there is a low level of turbidity. This is related to the low density of development in the catchment, the relatively intact nature of the swamp and its margins, and the high level of tidal flushing; the estuary almost completely empties each tidal cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units
    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaipara Harbour Sediments Information Review May TR 2009/055
    Kaipara Harbour Sediments Information Review May TR 2009/055 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No.055 May 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-67-5 Reviewed by: Approved for ARC Publication by: Name: Amy Taylor Name: Grant Barnes Position: Group Manager Monitoring and Position: Project Leader Land Research Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Date: 8 January 2009 Date: 8 January 2009 Recommended Citation: Reeve, G.; Swales, A.; Reed, J. (2008). Kaipara Harbour sediments: information review. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Regional Council and Northland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Document Type 2009/055. © 2008 Auckland Regional Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Regional Council's (ARC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of ARC. ARC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaipara Harbour Sedimentation Report
    5 Synthesis 5.1 Recent sedimentation in the Kaipara Harbour 5.1.1 Reliability of the sediment dating An important aspect of sedimentation studies is the validation of sediment accumulation rates (SAR). This is typically achieved by using two or more independent dating methods (section 3.5). In the present study, SAR have been estimated using the radioisotopes 210Pb and 137Cs. These two independent methods can provide accurate “sediment clocks” because they decay exponentially at a known constant rate. The 210Pb dating method potentially provides the most accurate geochronology. Firstly, 210Pb SAR estimates are based on regression fits to depth profiles of excess 210Pb concentrations. Thus, 210Pb SAR estimates have a statistical basis rather than being solely based on the reliability of a single dated marker horizon (i.e., 137Cs). 210Pb dating can be confounded by sediment mixing (i.e., physical and biological processes). In particular, downward mixing of excess 210Pb from the surface results in a steeper profile and therefore higher apparent SAR 7 value. In the present study, x-radiographs and the short-lived radioisotope Be (t1/2 = 53 days) provide supporting information to ascertain the validity of the 210Pb geochronology. For example, is sediment bedding present in the x-radiographs? Is there evidence of the burrowing and feeding activities of infauna? The depth of the surface-mixed layer (SML) produced by processes operating over time-scales of days–months can also be determined from the 7Be profile. In most cases the SML is a small fraction of the excess 210Pb profile depth so that this short term-mixing has a minor effect on the 210Pb profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Rates of Recent Sedimentation and Intertidal Vegetation Changes in the Kaipara Harbour
    Patterns and Rates of Recent Sedimentation and Intertidal Vegetation Changes in the Kaipara Harbour July 2013 Technical report 2013/023 Auckland Council Technical report, TR2013/023 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-1-927216-53-8 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927216-54-5 (PDF) Reviewed by: Approved for publication by: Name: Dr Jarrod Walker Name: Grant Barnes Position: Manager, Research, Position: Senior Marine Scientist Investigations and Monitoring Date: 19 July 2013 Date: 19 July 2013 Recommended citation: Swales, A.; Gibbs, M.; Ovenden, R.; Costley, K.; Hermanspahn, N.; Budd, R.; Rendle, D.; Hart, C.; Wadhwa, S. (2013). Patterns and rates of recent sedimentation and intertidal vegetation changes in the Kaipara Harbour. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Council and Northland Regional Council. Auckland Council technical report, TR2013/023 © 2013 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 17990 Rongoā Selection & Engagement Framework
    17990 RONGOĀ SELECTION & ENGAGEMENT FRAMEWORK JUNE 2018 Chris Pairama Director - Project Manager Kaipara Rohe – Te Whiti te Rā o Rēweti Marae Wānanga 2 1105 State Highway 16 Waimauku Auckland 0883 0210400072 [email protected] E NGA MATE HAERE. E MOKIMOKI ANA MATOU KAPUA POURI I TENEI WA. HAERE NGA MATE. RERE ATU I RUNGA I TE MATIMATI O TE TUPUNA MANU O WAITEMATA. TENEI TE TANGI I A MATOU NGA URI O TE MAUNGA TAPU TAUWHARE ME TE TUPUNA MANU KAIPARA. KA AO KA AO KA AWATEA Chris Pairama / Te MAMAI O KAURI pilot project report #2 / 2 TE MAMAI O KAURI PILOT PROJECT REPORT #2 by Chris Pairama (Te Taoū, Ngāti Whātua) Chris Pairama / Te MAMAI O KAURI pilot project report #2 / 3 Te Uhi Table of Contents Te MAMAI O KAURI pilot project report #2................................................................................ 2 Wānanga Report.............................................................................................................................. 4 Kupu Whakataki / Introduction .................................................................................................... 10 Terms of the Work Authorisation ............................................................................................. 10 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 10 MPI Terms of Procurement ...................................................................................................... 11 Kupu Whakamārama ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]