DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INFORMATION GUIDE 1996 CENSUS of Population and Dwellings Prepared by: Customer Services Statistics New Zealand CHRISTCHURCH 3rd March 1997 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ iii HOW TO USE THIS DIRECTORY ....................................................................... iv SUBJECT POPULATIONS ...................................................................................... v DWELLING, HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY ................................................ 1 PERSONAL INFORMATION ...................................................................... 11 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS ............................................................................... 148 INDEX ............................................................................................................ 212 ii INTRODUCTION This information guide provides a catalogue of the information available from the 1996 Census of Population and Dwellings. It represents all the 1996 Census information available . The information listed within this guide is categorised into four parts. There is Dwelling , Family, Personal , and Geographic information. Generally within each part, the variables are arranged alphabetically. iii HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE To order customised tables from the 1996 Census of Population and Dwellings, it is important that you specify exactly what you want. There are 5 key components to any table request. They are: (1) Census Year , e.g. 1996 (2) Subject Population , e.g. Population Resident in NZ (3) Areas , e.g. Area Unit of Usual Residence (4) Variable Name “Age Group Standard 5 Yearly with Broad Coverage” (5) Number of Categories for each Variable, e.g. (15) Examples The following examples list the table specifications required to produce the tables listed on the following pages. Example 1 Regional Council of Usual Residence (16),) Sex (3) by Age Group (18) for Population Resident in New Zealand Example 2 Territorial Local Authority of Usual Residence (76), Age Group (12) and Sex (3) by Industry (Major Division,) (11) for Population Resident in New Zealand Aged 15 Years and Over Gainfully Employed in the Full-time and Part-time Labour Force. Example 3 Number of Bedrooms (10) by Number of Occupants (9) for Private Dwellings iv SUBJECT POPULATIONS Total Population - This refers to persons present at the place of enumeration on census night including overseas visitors in NZ on census night. Excluded are NZ Residents who are temporarily out of the country on census night and NZ Armed Forces serving overseas on census night. Total Population Aged 15 Years and Over - As above for persons aged 15 years and over. Population Resident in New Zealand - Consists of Persons in NZ on census night who usually reside in NZ. Population Resident in New Zealand Aged 15 Years and Over - Consists of Persons in New Zealand on census night, aged 15 years and over who usually reside in NZ. Overseas Population - Persons in NZ on census night who usually reside overseas. Population Resident in New Zealand Aged 15 Years and Over Gainfully Employed in Full-time and Part-time Labour Force - Refers to persons usually resident in New Zealand employed in the full-time or part-time labour force. It excludes persons who are unemployed and seeking work and those persons in the non-labour force. Dwellings - A dwelling is any building or structure which is used as living quarters by a household of one or more persons on census night. It is usually self-contained in respect of sleeping, cooking, bathing and toilet facilities. It can be of a permanent, temporary or even mobile nature and includes structures such as motels, hotels, hospitals, etc. Private Dwellings - This is a permanent or temporary dwelling which is occupied by a private household. It includes houses and flats. Permanent Private Dwelling - This refers to a dwelling that is fixed in location, of durable construction, and occupied by a private household. v Categories: - Separate house - Two flats or houses joined together - Three or more flats or houses joined together - Flat or house joined to a business or shop - Bach, crib or hut (not in a work camp) - Temporary Private Dwellings - This is a temporary or mobile dwelling occupied by a private household. Categories: - Caravan, cabin or tent in a motor camp - Other (e.g. yacht - note no further breakdown of category available) Non Private Dwellings - This is a dwelling in which a number of generally unrelated persons (either individuals or families) live. Non-Private establishments usually have common cooking and dining facilities. Such dwellings include institutions and group-living quarters, e.g. hotels, motels, hospitals, prisons, school hostels, motor camps, etc. Persons of NZ Maori Ethnic Group Resident in New Zealand - Refers to persons who stated NZ Maori as either their sole ethnic group or as one of several ethnic groups and were in NZ on census night and usually reside in NZ. Persons of NZ Maori Ancestry Resident in New Zealand - Refers to persons who have Maori ancestors, no matter how distant and were in NZ on census night and usually reside in NZ. Persons of Pacific Island Polynesian Ethnic Group Resident in NZ - Refers to persons who stated a Pacific Island Polynesian ethnic group as either their sole ethnic group or as one of several ethnic groups and were in NZ on census night and usually reside in NZ. Population Resident in Private Dwellings - Refers to persons in private dwellings on census night. Population Usually Resident in Private Dwellings - Refers to persons who usually reside in private dwellings (includes those persons who were in the dwelling on census night and persons who were temporarily absent; but excludes guests and visitors to the dwelling on census night). vi 1996 Census Information Summation Options • Household/Dwelling • Family • Economic Family • Extended Family • Individual • Double Counting Dwelling, Household and Family Information • Dwelling Indicator (DWEIND) 1 | Private 2 | Non-Private 3 | Not Applicable • Dwelling Type (DWETYPE 01 | Separate house (including emergency house, women's refuge, DSW house, embassy) 02 | Two flats or houses joined together 03 | Three or more flats or houses joined together, in 1 or 2 storey building 04 | Three or more flats or houses joined together, in 3 or more storey building 05 | Flat or house joined to a business or shop 06 | Bach, crib or other holiday home 07 | Caravan, cabin or tent in a motor camp 08 | Mobile or temporary dwelling (not in a motor camp) 09 | Hotel, motel, guest house or boarding house (including NZ Post welfare cottage, time share units) 10 | Home for the elderly, retirement home 11 | Motor camp 12 | Welfare institution (church hostel, orphanage, night shelter, IHC house, drug recovery centre) 13 | Educational institution (school hostel, seminary, University halls of residence) 14 | Religious institution (convent, monastery, church retreat) 15 | Public hospital (including public convalescent home, maternity home, health camp) 16 | Private hospital (including private convalescent home, maternity home) 17 | Staff quarters, nurses' home (including seasonal group quarters - shearers, fruit pickers) 18 | Youth camp, school camp, scout/guide camp (including youth or immigration hostel, trampers' hut, Outward Bound) 19 | Work camp, construction camp, training camp 20 | Vessel (except navy vessel) 21 | Defence establishment (including armed forces camp, navy base, navy vessel) 22 | Prison, penal institution, police lock-up 23 | Commune 24 | Marae 25 | In transit/No fixed abode 1 • Occupancy (OCUPAN) 01 | Owned with Mortgage 02 | Owned without Mortgage 03 | Owned, Mortgage not specified 04 | Provided Rent Free 05 | Private Person (rented or leased) 07 | Housing New Zealand (rented or leased) 08 | Other Central Government Agency (rented or leased) 06 | Local Authority or City Council (rented or leased) 09 | Business, Real Estate Agency or other organisation (rented or leased) 10 | Landlord not specified (rented or leased) 11 | Not Owned, Rental status not specified 99 | Not specified • Number of Occupants in Household (OCCUNO 0001-0499 | individual occupants 0500-9999 | 500 or more occupants • Weekly Rent (RENT 0000 | No rent paid 0001 -0998 | $ dollars of weekly rent paid 0999 | $999 weekly rent paid 1000-9997 | $1000 or more weekly rent paid 9998 | Unidentifiable 9999 | Not specified • Tenure (TENURE 1 | Owned with Mortgage 2 | Owned without Mortgage 3 | Owned, Mortgage not specified 4 | Provided Rent Free 5 | Rented 6 | Not Owned, Rental status not specified 9 | Not specified ⇒ Rooms • Rooms- Number of (ROOMCNT 01 | One Room 02 | Two Rooms 03 | Three Rooms 04 | Four Rooms 05 | Five Rooms 06 | Six Rooms 07 | Seven Rooms 08 | Eight Rooms 09 | Nine Rooms 10 | Ten Rooms 11 | Eleven Rooms 12 | Twelve Rooms 13 | Thirteen Rooms 14 | Fourteen Rooms 15 | Fifteen Rooms 16 | Sixteen Rooms 17 | Seventeen Rooms 18 | Eighteen Rooms 19 | Nineteen Rooms 20 | Twenty Rooms 21 | Twenty One Rooms 22 | Twenty Two Rooms 23 | Twenty Three Rooms 24 | Twenty Four Rooms 2 25 | Twenty Five Rooms 26 | Twenty Six or More Rooms 98 | Unidentifiable 99 | Not specified • Rooms- Bedrooms Number of 01 | One Bedroom 02 | Two Bedrooms 03 | Three Bedrooms 04 | Four Bedrooms 05 | Five Bedrooms 06 | Six Bedrooms 07 | Seven Bedrooms 08 | Eight Bedrooms 09 | Nine Bedrooms 10 | Ten Bedrooms 11 | Eleven Bedrooms 12 | Twelve Bedrooms 13 | Thirteen Bedrooms 14 | Fourteen or more Bedrooms 98 | Unidentifiable 99 | Not specified • Rooms-
Recommended publications
  • Te Awamutu Courier

    Te Awamutu Courier

    ISSN 1170-1099 FOR ALL YOUR REAL ESTATE NEEDS CONTACT: Chris Gadsby Rural/Lifestyle Specialist 075TC070/06 Mobile: 027 246 5800 A/hrs: 07 870 1386 Published Tuesday and Thursday THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2006 Rosetown Realty Ltd MREINZ phone: (07) 871-7149 Circulated FREE to all households throughout Te Awamutu and surrounding districts. Extra copies 35c. BRIEFLY Shellfi sh warning Trees make way for roses includes Aotea The Public Health Unit of Paddy Stephens rapt Pat’s ‘Big Purple’ will thrive out of the shade Waikato District Health Board today issued a public health Paddy Stephens is una- tenance out of existing warning against collecting or shamedly ecstatic that budgets. consuming shellfi sh harvested several large trees have Asset manager recrea- on the West Coast between, but been removed from the tion, Max Ward says the excluding, Kawhia Harbour and Rose Garden. cashmeriana had lost a Kaipara Harbour. She is a self-confessed third of its crown due to The warning is an extension tree lover - but adds her dieback and it was agreed to one issued on June 9 to fi rst passion is for the to remove it, along with include Aotea Harbour (also roses. fi ve or six trees on the includes Raglan and Manukau Mrs Stephens is chair- Gorst Avenue boundary Harbours). person of the Te Awamutu to the Rose Garden which Routine tests on shellfi sh Rose Trust, the organi- have pushed over the samples taken from Aotea sation that has spent brick wall. Harbour last week have shown thousands of dollars over They will make way levels of Paralytic Shellfi sh 30 years stocking the Te for a new footpath and Poisoning (PSP) at 129 micro- Awamutu Rose Garden boundary fence - once grams of toxin per 100 grams with quality varieties.
  • The Native Land Court, Land Titles and Crown Land Purchasing in the Rohe Potae District, 1866 ‐ 1907

    The Native Land Court, Land Titles and Crown Land Purchasing in the Rohe Potae District, 1866 ‐ 1907

    Wai 898 #A79 The Native Land Court, land titles and Crown land purchasing in the Rohe Potae district, 1866 ‐ 1907 A report for the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry (Wai 898) Paul Husbands James Stuart Mitchell November 2011 ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Report summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 The Statements of Claim ..................................................................................................................... 3 The report and the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry .............................................................................. 5 The research questions ........................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to other reports in the casebook ..................................................................................... 8 The Native Land Court and previous Tribunal inquiries .................................................................. 10 Sources .............................................................................................................................................. 10 The report’s chapters ......................................................................................................................... 20 Terminology .....................................................................................................................................
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism

    Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism

    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009

    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009

    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
  • Infill Housing: Intensification and the District Plan

    Infill Housing: Intensification and the District Plan

    Intensification and the District Plan Issues and Options for Facilitating and Managing Intensive Residential Development in Wellington City Final Report December 2007 Project name: Intensification and the District Plan – Issues and Options for Wellington City Document 1574 reference: Date of this December 2007 version: Status of report: Final Report prepared David Mead – Director by: Report reviewed Andrew Macleod – Senior Consultant by: Hill Young Cooper Ltd Hill Young Cooper Ltd Level 4, 128 Broadway Level 3, AMP Chambers PO Box 99847 187 Featherston Street Newmarket PO Box 8092, The Terrace Auckland 1149 Wellington 6143 p: 09 529 2684 p: 04 473 5310 f: 09 520 4685 f: 04 473 5307 e: [email protected] e: [email protected] Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 The Purpose of the Project ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background to the Project ................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Structure of the Report .................................................................................................... 3 2 THE WELLINGTON CONTEXT - AREAS OF CHANGE ................................................4 2.1 Possible areas of redevelopment ......................................................................................
  • In Liquidation)

    In Liquidation)

    Liquidators’ First Report on the State of Affairs of Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) 8 March 2019 Contents Introduction 2 Statement of Affairs 4 Creditors 5 Proposals for Conducting the Liquidation 6 Creditors' Meeting 7 Estimated Date of Completion of Liquidation 8 Appendix A – Statement of Affairs 9 Appendix B – Schedule of known creditors 10 Appendix C – Creditor Claim Form 38 Appendix D - DIRRI 40 Liquidators First Report Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) 1 Introduction David Ian Ruscoe and Malcolm Russell Moore, of Grant Thornton New Zealand Limited (Grant Thornton), were appointed joint and several Interim Liquidators of the Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) (the “Trust” or “Taratahi”) by the High Count in Wellington on 19 December 2018. Mr Ruscoe and Mr Moore were then appointed Liquidators of the Trust on 5th February 2019 at 10.50am by Order of the High Court. The Liquidators and Grant Thornton are independent of the Trust. The Liquidators’ Declaration of Independence, Relevant Relationships and Indemnities (“DIRRI”) is attached to this report as Appendix D. The Liquidators set out below our first report on the state of the affairs of the Companies as required by section 255(2)(c)(ii)(A) of the Companies Act 1993 (the “Act”). Restrictions This report has been prepared by us in accordance with and for the purpose of section 255 of the Act. It is prepared for the sole purpose of reporting on the state of affairs with respect to the Trust in liquidation and the conduct of the liquidation.
  • Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand

    Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand

    FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 7 August 2013 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Freepost Parliament, Adams, Hon Amy Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 6831 Minister for the Environment Wellington 6160 (04) 817 6531 Minister for Communications Selwyn National [email protected] and Information Technology Associate Minister for Canter- 829 Main South Road, Templeton (03) 344 0418/419 bury Earthquake Recovery Christchurch Fax: (03) 344 0420 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Ardern, Jacinda List Labour Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9388 Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 472 7036 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 817 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6445 Ardern, Shane Taranaki–King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Auchinvole, Chris List National (04) 817 6936 Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9392 Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh National List Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 473 0469 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Banks, Hon John Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Leader, ACT party Wellington 6160 Minister for Regulatory Reform [email protected] (04) 817 9999 Minister for Small Business ACT Epsom Fax
  • Policies 249

    Policies 249

    249 long term plan 2012-22 Policies The following policies set out basic principles and associated guidelines that Council will follow to direct and limit actions, in pursuit of its long term goal of sustainable development and providing for Community well-being now and into the future. policies 250 Significance Policy PURPOSE • The costs (financial and non-financial). The Invercargill City Council endeavours to be open • Implications on Council’s capacity to undertake its in its decision making, having taken into account the activities. views of its communities. The Policy on Significance • Section 97 (certain decisions to be taken only details: if provided for in the Long Term Plan), Local • The Invercargill City Council’s general approach Government Act 2002. to determining the significance of proposals The following financial thresholds are identified as and decisions in relation to issues, assets or significant: other matters that have not been included in the • Increase greater than 2% to general or targeted Annual Plan and/or Long Term Plan consultation rates for an activity. processes. • Unbudgeted expenditure of $5 million. • The thresholds and criteria to be used in • Unbudgeted annual operating cost increases in determining the extent of significance. excess of $500,000. • The Invercargill City Council's procedures for making decisions. The Invercargill City Council will use the following criteria to determine the level of significance where a • The strategic assets of the Invercargill City proposal or decision meets the significance threshold Council. test: If a proposal or decision is determined by this policy • Whether the decision flows logically and to be significant, the Council will engage and consult consequentially from a decision already with the Community before making a final decision.
  • Environmental Pest Plants

    Environmental Pest Plants

    REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY © Crown Copyright 2010 145 Contract Report No. 2075 REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, J. 1885: On the botany of Te Aroha Mountain. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 17: 275-281 Allaby, M. (ed) 1994: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 415 pp. Allan, H. H. 1982: Flora of New Zealand. Vol 1. Government Printer, Wellington. Allen, D.J. 1983: Notes on the Kaimai-Mamaku Forest Park. New Zealand Forest Service, Tauranga (unpublished). 20 p. Allen R.B. and McLennan M.J. 1983, Indigenous forest survey manual: two inventory methods. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 48. 73 pp. Allen R.B. 1992: An inventory method for describing New Zealand vegetation. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 181. 25 pp. Anon 1975: Biological reserves and forest sanctuaries. What’s New in Forest Research 21. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua. 4 p. Anon 1982: Species list from Kopurererua Stream. New Zealand Wildlife Service National Habitat Register, May 1982. Bay of Plenty Habitat sheets, Folder 2, records room, Rotorua Conservancy. Anon 1983a: Reserve proposals. Northern Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Background notes for SFSRAC Meeting and Inspection, 1983. Tauranga. 12 pp. Anon 1983b: The inadequacy of the ecological reserves proposed for the Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Joint campaign on Native Forests, Nelson. 14 p. plus 3 references. Anon 1983c: Overwhelming support to save the Kaimai-Mamaku. Bush Telegraph 12: 1-2. Wellington. Anon 1989: Conservation values of natural areas on Tasman Forestry freehold and leasehold land. Unpublished report for Tasman Forestry Ltd, Department of Conservation and Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society.

  • Short Walks in the Invercargill Area Invercargill the in Walks Short Conditions of Use of Conditions

    W: E: www.icc.govt.nz [email protected] F: P: +64 3 217 5358 217 3 +64 9070 219 3 +64 Queens Park, Invercargill, New Zealand New Invercargill, Park, Queens Makarewa Office Parks Council City Invercargill For further information contact: information further For Lorneville Lorneville - Dacre Rd North Rd contents of this brochure. All material is subject to copyright. copyright. to subject is material All brochure. this of contents Web: www.es.govt.nz Web: for loss, cost or damage whatsoever arising out of or connected with the the with connected or of out arising whatsoever damage or cost loss, for 8 Email: [email protected] Email: responsibility for any error or omission and disclaim liability to any entity entity any to liability disclaim and omission or error any for responsibility West Plains Rd 9 McIvor Rd 5115 211 03 Ph: the agencies involved in the management of these walking tracks accept no no accept tracks walking these of management the in involved agencies the Waikiwi 9840 Invercargill While all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, publication, this of accuracy the ensure to taken been has care due all While Waihopai Bainfield Rd 90116 Bag Private Disclaimer Grasmere Southland Environment 7 10 Rosedale Waverley www.doc.govt.nz Web: Web: www.southerndhb.govt.nz Web: Bay Rd Herbert St Findlay Rd [email protected] Email: Email: [email protected] Email: Avenal Windsor Ph: 03 211 2400 211 03 Ph: Ph: 03 211 0900 211 03 Ph: Queens Dr Glengarry Tay St Invercargill 9840 Invercargill
  • A Review of the Economic Impact of High Levels of Variance in Fertiliser Spreading Systems

    A Review of the Economic Impact of High Levels of Variance in Fertiliser Spreading Systems

    139 A review of the economic impact of high levels of variance in fertiliser spreading systems M.C.E. GRAFTON1, I.J. YULE2 and M.J. MANNING1 1 Ravensdown Fertiliser Co-operative Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand, 2 New Zealand Centre for Precision Agriculture, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. [email protected] Abstract be measured, which provides the transverse coefficient Recent technological improvements in Geographical of variation (CV). Søgaard & Kierkegaard (1994) Information Systems (GIS) have made it possible to established the theory of exponential increases in cost, measure the accuracy of fertiliser spreading in the field. in terms of reduced fertiliser efficacy and spreading This demonstrates that the field coefficient of variation, accuracy within a field crop or paddock with reduced “field CV”, of actual spread patterns on farms is spreading accuracy, which is referred to today as the significantly higher than appreciated by most end users field CV. and service providers. Levels of field CV greater than There is confusion as to what a CV (the ratio of the 40% for spreading N fertiliser produces a 20% yield standard deviation to the mean) means in fertiliser reduction, which in terms of urea on dairy pasture is spread. Some of the confusion is a result of there being potentially around $170 million nationally, and is two commonly used terms when discussing fertiliser economically significant. Manufacturers of fertiliser CV, i.e., “transverse CV” and “field CV”. The most spreading equipment and ground-spread applicators commonly measured transverse CV is produced from have introduced improved delivery technologies which a transverse tray test and is used to calculate the appropriate bout or swath width for a spreading vehicle reduce field CV.
  • Tākiri Mai Te Ata Whānau Ora Collective Kokiri Hauora Response for the Community During and Following the COVID-19 Lockdown 2020

    Tākiri Mai Te Ata Whānau Ora Collective Kokiri Hauora Response for the Community During and Following the COVID-19 Lockdown 2020

    A quantitative analysis of Tākiri Mai Te Ata Whānau Ora Collective Kokiri Hauora response for the community during and following the COVID-19 Lockdown 2020 Report prepared by Stella Vickers (Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington) Cheryl Davies (Tu Kotahi Māori Asthma and Research Trust) Jane Hopkirk (Tākiri Mai Te Ata Trust) December 2020 Updated 1st March 2021 2 Contents Figures......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Tables .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 He mihi nui – Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Tākiri Mai Te Ata Whānau Ora Collective.................................................................................................................. 13 The Common Unity Project Aotearoa – The Remakery ....................................................................................... 13 Moving forward with The Remakery ....................................................................................................................