Strengthening the Resilience of Vulnerable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strengthening the Resilience of Vulnerable Strengthening the Resilience of Vulnerable Family Farms to Climate Project/Programme title: Change in the Fourth Agricultural Development Pole in Benin Country(ies): Benin National Designated Ministry of Living Environment and Sustainable Development Authority(ies) (NDA): Accredited Entity(ies) (AE): Fonds National pour L'Environnement Date of first submission: 9/18/2020 V.1 Date of current submission: 9/18/2020 V.1 Version 1 A. Project / Programme Summary (max. 1 page) ☒ Project ☒ Public sector A.2. Public or A.1. Project or programme A.3 RFP Not applicable private sector ☐ Programme ☐ Private sector Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation: 0% ☐ Low emission transport: 0% ☐ Buildings, cities and industries and appliances: 0% A.4. Indicate the result ☐ Forestry and land use: 0% areas for the project/programme Adaptation: Increased resilience of: ☒ Most vulnerable people and communities: 33.33% ☒ Health and well-being, and food and water security: 33.33% ☐ Infrastructure and built environment: 0% ☒ Ecosystem and ecosystem services: 33.34% A.5.1. Estimated mitigation impact (tCO2eq over project lifespan) A.5.2. Estimated adaptation impact 149,000 direct beneficiaries (number of direct beneficiaries) A.5. Impact potential A.5.3. Estimated adaptation impact 894,000 indirect beneficiaries (number of indirect beneficiaries) A.5.4. Estimated adaptation impact 5.6% of the country’s total population (% of total population) A.6. Financing information A.6.1. Indicative GCF funding requested (max Amount: 9,944,942 Currency: USD Financial Instrument: Grants 10M) Amount: 1,205,001 Currency: USD Financial Instrument: Grants A.6.2. Indicative co-financing Institution: MAEP AND FNEC A.6.3. Indicative total project Amount: 11,149,943 Currency: USD cost (GCF + co-finance) disbursement A.7. Implementation period: 60 A.7.2. Total project/ Programme 20 period: repayment period, if lifespan applicable: A.8. Is funding from the A.9. Is the Environmental and ☐ Yes ☒ Yes Project Preparation Social Safeguards Category C or ☒ No No Facility needed? I-3? ☐ 1- Project interventions will consist in the implementation of water and A.10. Provide rationale for soil conservation measures, the promotion of alternative farming systems to the ESS categorization slash-and-burn shifting cultivation and the setting up of an effective (100 words) mechanism for integrating adaptation monitoring and evaluation in the national agricultural extension system. Thus, the activities will not have Simplified Approval Process CONCEPT NOTE Template V.1.1 GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 2 OF 27 significant negative impacts on the environment, and will not require any land expropriation or land grabbing, population displacement and/or reallocation of ownership rights of the local populations on lands and natural resources. All activities of the project will be carried out in strict compliance with local and national legislation and property rights. The landscape approach that takes into account rural land plans will be the basis of the implementation of the project to A.11. Has the CN been ☒ Yes ☐ Confidential A.12. Confidentiality shared with the NDA? ☐ No ☒ Not confidential A.13. Executing Entity The Ministere de l'Agriculture, de l'Elevage et de la Peche (MAEP), GIZ, information Territorial Agricultural Development Agency (ATDA4 3- Benin is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The effects of the global warming are already perceptive across the country in terms of temperature increase, rainfall decrease and in several areas and poor rainfall distribution at national level, the shortening of the rainy season A.14. Project/Programme duration, as well as more recurrent and severe drought periods. The rationale, objectives and proposed project aims at supporting adaptation actions in the agricultural approach of programme/project (max sector in the fourth agricultural development pole (PDA4) of Benin. The 100 words) project is structured into three main components: i) large-scale promotion of alternative and climate-resilient agricultural technologies, ii) implementation of sustainable yam-based farming system as alternative for slash-and-burn shifting yam cropping , and iii) mainstreaming climate change adaptation in the national agricultural extension and monitoring & evaluation systems B. Project / Programme information B.1. Context and Baseline (500 words) Biophysical impacts of climate change in Benin: 4.Benin is highly vulnerable to climate change due to the high natural variability of its climate, the heavy dependence of the economy on rainfed agriculture, the low diversification of the economy and its weak capacity to adapt and to cope with the negative impacts of climate change. The consequences of global warming are reflected throughout the country by an increase in temperatures of 1°C between 1950 and 2005[1], a poor distribution and, in several regions, a decrease in rainfall of up to 275 mm3. Furthermore, shortening of rainy season duration and an increase in the frequency of more severe droughts have been observed[2],[3],[4],[5]. With a global temperature increase of 1.5°C in the future[6], the country is expected to experience more severe and unpredictable weather disturbances. Forecasts indicate an increase in local temperatures of around 2 to 4.5°C by 21009 and highly uncertain seasonal rainfall4,[7] with an increase in the number of years with a shortfall in precipitation4. More downscaled and near-future projections (2025-2050) show temperature increases in most months of the year[8], while rainfall patterns in terms of the number of consecutive wet days, heavy rainfall and annual wet-days rainfall total are expected to decline significantly[9]. The temperature increase is also expected to be larger in the dry seasons, implying that localities already suffering from drought and drying climate may face even bigger challenges in the future11. Extreme events such as floods, droughts and excessive heat waves will also become more frequent and intense in Benin[10]. Studies have shown that in the absence of adaptation measures, climate change will lead to a significant loss of arable land[11] due to extreme temperatures, excessive rainfall, and degradation of topography and soil quality[12]. Specifically, forecasts predict a decrease in prime quality farmland with high agricultural potential, an increase of hydromorphic and water-stress and an expansion of soils with severe climatic or topographic constraints[13]. By reducing rainfall and Simplified Approval Process CONCEPT NOTE Template V.1.1 GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 3 OF 27 increasing temperatures, it is also expected that climate change will negatively impact water availability, and therefore increase water stress and conflicts for water and land control9. Socio economic impacts: 5.The physical changes described above will strongly impact economic and social systems and increase the vulnerability of populations, whose living conditions are already precarious. Benin's economy relies mainly on rainfed agriculture[14]. The agricultural sector employs more than 70% of the working population (3,853,368 persons, whereas women with poor access to formal education are responsible for 60-80% of agricultural work), and contributes with 28,3% to the GDP[15]. It provides more than 75% of export revenue and accounts for 15% of national revenue17. This heavy dependence on the rainfed agriculture makes the country particularly vulnerable to climate disturbances. Agricultural production will be seriously compromised by high risks of droughts, soil aridity, excessive heat, and reductions and/or poor distribution of rainfall. Estimations suggest that drought-prone crops such as cereals and tubers will be strongly affected by drought and water-deficit due to insufficient rainfalls and dry spells in near future9,[16],[17], while these crops play a major role in the food and nutrition security of the population of Benin. A drop in yam yields of around 33-48% is predicted between 2040-2050, especially in the Fourth Agricultural Development Pole (PDA4[18]) and the upper Ouémé Valley18. Climate change may also induce a considerable decline in cereal yields (maize, rice, sorghum) up to 17% and 30% respectively by 2050[19] and 20803,18. Studies carried out in PAD4 also projected resources diversion from water-sensitive food crops (maize, yam or cassava) in the benefinit of less water-demanding crops such as cotton, groundnut and sorghum, which will significantly be expanded over areas currently under maize, yam or cassava cultivation10. This is a serious threat for the food security given the importance of cerals, tubers and roots in sustaining subsitance and food needs of the poor and more vulnerable groups. Further decrease in food production is also expected from the negative effects of global warming on basic agricultural resources namely soil, water and biodiversity[20]. Declining rainfall and/or rising temperatures will negatively affect farm income[21],[22]. Estimates suggest that a 10% increase in temperatures would reduce net farm income by 13%[23]. 6.People's access to food and other basic needs will be indirectly affected by the negative effects of climate change on economic growth, income distribution, and employment21,[24]. Benin could experience a heavy economic loss estimated between 45 and 64% of its agricultural GDP, or about 4- 6% of its GDP, by 2100 due to climate change[25]. Extreme events will also cause significant damage and loss by destroying crops and important
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Update Choléra
    Benin Update Choléra 22 Septembre 2016 @UNICEF Benin 2016 Benin @UNICEF Du 9 août au 22 septembre 2016, au total, 508 cas ont été enregistrés au Bénin dont 10 décès soit une létalité de 1,96 %. A ce jour, 13 communes sur 77 et 6 départements sur 12 sont touchés. Cas Décès 1er Septembre +25 cas avec 22 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 cas à Allada 1 2 Septembre +22 cas avec17 à Cotonou, 4 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 à So-Ava 1 3 Septembre +21 cas avec 19 à Cotonou, 1 à Allada, 1 à So-Ava et 1 à Abomey 0 4 Septembre + 22 cas; 14 à Cotonou, 7 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Parakou 0 5 Septembre + 26 cas; 24 à Cotonou, 1 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Ouidah 0 6 Septembre + 10 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 7 Septembre + 8 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 8 Septembre + 20 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 9 Septembre + 12 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 10 Septembre + 12 cas; avec 11 à Cotonou et 1 à Ndali(Borgou) 0 11 Septembre + 14 cas; Cotonou seulement 1 12 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 13 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 14 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 15 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 16 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 17 Septembre + 12 cas; 6 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-calavi et 4 à Savalou 0 18 Septembre + 15 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 3 à Savalou 0 19 Septembre + 13 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 1 à Abomey-calavi 0 20 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 21 Septembre + 10 cas; 9 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 22 Septembre + 8 cas; 7 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Étrangère Dans L'alibori Synthèse Des Principaux Résult
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN ------------------- MINISTERE DU PLAN ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT ------------------- Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique Synthèse des principaux résultats du RGPH-4 de l’ALIBORI 1- Etat et structure de la population de l’Alibori Evolution de la population de l’Alibori de 2002 à 2013 Taux d'accroissement Poids DIVISIONS RGPH4-2013 RGPH3-2002 intercensitaire démographique ADMINISTRATIVES en % (2002- en % en 2013 Total Masculin Féminin Total Masculin Féminin 2013) BENIN 10 008 749 4 887 820 5 120 929 6 769 914 3 284 119 3 485 795 3,52 ALIBORI 867 463 431 357 436 106 521 093 259 588 261 505 4,61 8,7 Banikoara 246 575 122 445 124 130 152 028 75 829 76 199 4,37 28,4 Gogounou 117 523 58 018 59 505 80 013 39 759 40 254 3,46 13,5 Kandi 179 290 88 998 90 292 95 206 47 600 47 606 5,76 20,7 Karimama 66 353 33 149 33 204 39 579 19 792 19 787 4,68 7,6 Malanville 168 641 83 681 84 960 101 628 50 263 51 365 4,58 19,4 Ségbana 89 081 45 066 44 015 52 639 26 345 26 294 4,77 10,3 En 2013, le département de l’Alibori compte 867 463 habitants soit 8,7% Evolution (en %) de la structure par âge de la population de l'Alibori au RGPH-1992, RGPH-2002 25,0 de la population béninoise. Le taux et RGPH-2013 1992 2002 2013 d’accroissement intercensitaire de 20,0 On constate depuis 1992 une 4,61% est supérieur à la moyenne augmentation de la proportion de la nationale.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA-Benin's ‘Access to Land’ Project and Its Aftermath
    BENIN INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC WP19/BID08 CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAND ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN BENIN Philippe Lavigne Delville French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, With discussion by Kenneth Houngbedji Paris School of Economics August 2019 History and Political Economy of Land Administration Reform in Benin Table of contents Acronyms ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Land reforms in Africa, between the privatisation paradigm and the adaptation paradigm 1 1.2 Understanding the political economy of an ongoing reform: a process-tracing approach 4 2 State ownership, informality, semi-formal arrangements and ‘confusion management’: a brief analysis of the land sector in the early 2000s 6 2.1 Institutional weaknesses and semi-formal arrangements 6 2.2 Land governance, between neo-customary regulations, the market, and semi- formal systems 10 2.3 ‘Managing confusion’ 13 2.4 Institutional bottlenecks before reforms: a tentative synthesis 15 3 The search for overall/sectorial adjustment in the land sector in the years 1990– 2000: a telescoping of reforms 16 3.1 The emergence of the land issue in the 1990s 16 3.2 In urban areas, tax experiments and unsuccessful discussions on legal reform 16 3.3 In rural areas, the PFRs and the draft rural land law: the construction of an alternative to land title 17 3.4 In the mid-2000s: the MCA-Benin and the emergence of a global reform project 20 4 Extend access to land title through a deep reform of land administration: MCA- Benin's ‘Access to Land’ project and its aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Pédologique De Reconnaissance De La République Populaire Du Bénin À 1/200.000 : Feuille De Djougou
    P. FAURE NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la République Populaire du Bénin à 1/200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU OFFICE OE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIWE ET TECHNIOUE OUTRE-MER 1 PARIS 1977 NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la RepubliquePopulaire du Bénin à 1 /200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU P. FAURE ORSTOM PARIS 1977 @ORSTOM 2977 ISBN 2-7099-0423-3(édition cornpl8te) ISBN 2-7099-0433-0 SOMMAI RE l. l INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 I .GENERALITES SUR LE MILIEU ET LA PEDOGENESE ........... 3 Localisationgéographique ............................ 3 Les conditionsde milieu 1. Le climat ................... 3 2 . La végétation ................. 6 3 . Le modelé et l'hydrographie ....... 8 4 . Le substratum géologique ........ 10 Les matériaux originels et la pédogenèse .................. 12 1 . Les matériaux originels .......... 12 2 . Les processus pédogénétiques ...... 13 II-LESSOLS .......................................... 17 Classification 1. Principes de classification ....... 17 2 . La légende .................. 18 Etudemonographique 1 . Les sols minérauxbruts ......... 20 2 . Les sois peuévolués ............ 21 3 . Les sols ferrugineuxtropicaux ....... 21 4 . Les sols ferraliitiques ........... 38 CONCLUSION .......................................... 43 Répartitiondes' sols . Importance relative . Critèresd'utilisation . 43 Les principalescontraintes pour la mise en valeur ............ 46 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ........................................ 49 1 INTRODUCTION La carte pédologique de reconnaissance à 1/200 000, feuille DJOUGOU, fait partie d'un ensemble de neuf coupures imprimées couvrant la totalité du terri- toire de la République Populaire du Bénin. Les travaux de terrain de la couverture générale ont été effectués de 1967 à 1971 par les quatre pédologues de la Section de Pédologie du Centre O. R.S. T.O.M. de Cotonou : D. DUBROEUCQ, P. FAURE, M. VIENNOT, B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cage Project Final Evaluation 2001-2005
    COMMUNITY ACTION FOR GIRLS EDUCATION WORLD LEARNING / USAID CAGE PROJECT FINAL EVALUATION 2001-2005 June 2005 Justin DONGBEHOUNDE François GAUTHO Consultants CONTENTS Pages 0- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I- BACKGROUND 5 II- OBJECTIVES AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES 5 III- EVALUATION PROBLEMS 7 IV- EVALUATION RESULTATS 7 1. Level of results achievement and objectives 7 2. Analysis of the approach, strategies and stakeholders 17 3. Management and coordination of the project 19 4. Sustainability durability and replication of the experience 20 5. Strengths and weaknesses of the project 21 V- CONCLUSIONS 22 VI- RECOMMENDATIONS 23 VII- APPENDICES 24 CAGE project final evaluation O- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions · The four objectives set are met both quantitatively and qualitatively. · The starting hypothesis of the project, that well stimulated community participation could lead to better results in the promotion of girls education is verified and it is correct. In fact, CAGE project has succeeded in arousing a high community mobilization and a strong commitment of CRL (Local representative Committees) and CCEF with meaningful results in their quantity and quality, in their dimension and depth. · This ability to stimulate the local/social support and mobilization comes from CAGE approach that is the entire process and steps leading to the set up of CRL and CCEF, the vision analysis and strategies, up to the micro project funding, all this back up with a very good social communication. · In this process, the set up of CRL and their composition played an important role. Truly the intension is a representative committee. Initially the social communication showed that members would be like pioneers, with no specific advantages, but more sacrifices and a lot of work to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Ketou
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN =-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-= MINISTERE DE LA PROSPECTIVE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT ET DE L’EVALUATION DE L’ACTION PUBLIQUE (MPDEAP) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE L’ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE (INSAE) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= MONOGRAPHIE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DIRECTION DES ETUDES DEMOGRAPHIQUES Décembre 2008 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX ............................................................................................................ vi LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ........................................................................................................ x PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... xi NOTE METHODOLOGIQUE SUR LE RGPH-3 .................................................................. xiii SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE KETOU DANS LE BENIN .......................................... 1 SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DANS LE DEPARTEMENT DU PLATEAU ............................................................................................... 2 1- GENERALITES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1-1 Présentation de la commune .................................................................................................. 3 1-1-1 Le relief ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-Cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”
    Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin” Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of persistent organic pollutants and obsolete pesticides and strengthening life-cycle management of pesticides in Benin” GCP/BEN/056/GFF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Polio Outbreak for Four Months;
    Emergency appeal n°: Africa: Polio MDR61004 (West & Central Africa); MDR64005 (East Africa); MDR63002 (Southern Africa) Operations update n° 1 outbreak 14 May 2009 Period covered by this Ops Update: 7 April – 14 May, 2009 Appeal target (current): this appeal has been provisionally increased to CHF 2,520,794 (USD 2.3m or EUR 1.7) Appeal coverage: 24.6% (indicative) against the provisional revised budget figure of CHF 2.5m; the final revised budgets and updated financial report will be made available shortly; <click here to link to contact details for further information Appeal history: · This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 7 April 2009 to assist approximately 25 million children under 5 years of age in 14 countries affected by the polio outbreak for four months; · This Operations Update seeks to add the three following countries in West Africa Volunteers from the Burkinabe Red Cross work with district to the Appeal (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra health teams to vaccinate a child against polio. Leone); the Appeal budget is provisionally revised to CHF 2.5m. · Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF): CHF 357,842 was initially allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support emergency response campaigns in March (Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, and Mali) and April (Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo). CHF 235,888 was allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support the emergency response campaign in April in Kenya. · Global Measles & Polio Initiative: CHF 160,000 was initially allocated from the Health and Care Department’s Global Measles & Polio Initiative to support activities in four countries during February and March (Cote d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Togo).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Risks Factors of Porcine Cysticercosis in Southern Benin Based Meat Inspection Records
    International Research Journal of Microbiology (IRJM) (ISSN: 2141-5463) Vol. 4(8) pp. 188-196, September, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/irjm.2013.043 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJM Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Spatial distribution and risks factors of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin based meat inspection records Judicaël S. E. Goussanou ab* , T. Marc Kpodekon ab , Claude Saegerman c, Eric Azagoun a, A. K. Issaka Youssao a, Souaïbou Farougou a, Nicolas Praet d, Sarah Gabriël d., Pierre Dorny d, Nicolas Korsak e aDepartment of animal Production and Heath, Ecole Polytechnique of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin bLaboratory of Applied Biology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin cDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Research Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULg), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium dDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium eFood Sciences Department, Faculty of veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] : Tel: 0022995700449/ 0022997168992 Abstract Porcine cysticercosis, which is widely distributed in Africa, causes financial losses and diseases among humans. To control the disease in an area, it is important to know the geographical distribution. In this study, spatial distribution of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin was performed. By using the number of partial organ seizures at meat inspection, the study has revealed high risks of porcine cysticercosis in administrative districts of Aplahoue, Dogbo, Klouekanme and Lokossa. The proportion of seizures ranged from 0.06% for neck muscles to 0.69% for tongues.
    [Show full text]