DOCSLIB.ORG

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Fish and Wildlife Service Monday, April 23, 2007 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign Species; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:36 Apr 20, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23APP2.SGM 23APP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_2 20184 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the above immediate publication of a proposed address. rule to list a species is precluded by Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: higher-priority listing proposals, and Marie T. Maltese at the above address, expeditious progress is being made to 50 CFR Part 17 or by telephone, 703–358–1708; fax, add and remove species from the Lists, as appropriate. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 703–358–2276; or e-mail, [email protected]; or through Pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings Act, when, in response to a petition, we on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. find that listing a species is warranted Species; Annual Description of but precluded, we must make a new 12- Progress on Listing Actions SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: month finding annually until we publish a proposed rule or make a AGENCY: Background Fish and Wildlife Service, determination that listing is not Interior. The Endangered Species Act of 1973, warranted. These subsequent 12-month ACTION: Review of findings on petitions. as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et findings are referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ seq.), provides two mechanisms for petition findings. This notice contains SUMMARY: In this review, we announce considering species for listing. First, we our resubmitted petition findings for all our annual petition findings for foreign can identify and propose for listing foreign species that are currently the species, as required under section those species that are endangered or subject of outstanding petitions. 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Endangered Species threatened based on the factors Act of 1973, as amended. When, in contained in section 4(a)(1). We Previous Notices response to a petition, we find that implement this through the candidate The species discussed in this review listing a species is warranted but program. Candidate taxa are those taxa were the result of three separate precluded, we must complete a new for which we have sufficient petitions submitted to the Service to list status review each year until we publish information on file relating to biological a number of foreign bird and butterfly a proposed rule or make a determination vulnerability and threats to support a species as threatened or endangered that listing is not warranted. These proposal to list the taxa as endangered under the Act. We received petitions to subsequent status reviews and the or threatened, but for which preparation list foreign bird species on November accompanying 12-month findings are and publication of a proposed rule is 28, 1980, and April 30, 1991 (46 FR referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ petition precluded by higher-priority listing 26464 and 56 FR 58664 respectively). findings. actions. None of the species covered by On January 10, 1994, we received a Information contained in this review this review were assessed through the petition to list 7 butterfly species as describes our status review of 56 foreign candidate program; they were the result threatened or endangered (59 FR 24117). taxa that were the subjects of previous of public petitions to add species to the We took several actions on these warranted-but-precluded findings. Lists of Endangered and Threatened petitions, and to notify the public, we Based on our review, we find that 50 Wildlife and Plants (Lists), which is the published earlier petition findings, species continue to warrant listing, but other mechanism for considering status reviews, and petition finding that their listing remains precluded by species for listing. Under section reviews that included foreign species in higher-priority listing actions (see Table 4(b)(3)(A), when we receive such a the Federal Register on May 12, 1981 1). For six species previously found to petition, we must determine within 90 (46 FR 26464); January 20, 1984 (49 FR be warranted but precluded, listing is days, to the maximum extent 2485); May 10, 1985 (50 FR 19761); now warranted. We will promptly practicable, whether the petition January 9, 1986 (51 FR 996); July 7, 1988 publish a listing proposal for those six presents substantial scientific or (53 FR 25511); December 29, 1988 (53 species. commercial information indicating that FR 52747); January 6, 1989 (54 FR 554); With this review, we are requesting the petitioned action may be warranted November 21, 1991 (56 FR 58664); additional status information for the 50 (90-day finding). If we make a positive March 28, 1994 (59 FR 14496); May 10, species that remain warranted-but- 90-day finding, we are required to 1994 (59 FR 24117), and January 12, precluded by higher priority listing promptly commence a review of the 1995 (60 FR 2899). Our most recent actions. We will consider this status of the species. Section 4(b)(3)(B) review of petition findings was information in preparing listing of the Act requires that we must make published on May 21, 2004 (69 FR documents and future resubmitted one of three findings within 12 months 29354). petition findings. This information will of the receipt of the petition (12-month Since our last review of petition also help us to monitor the status of the finding). findings we have taken two listing taxa and in conserving them. The first possible 12-month finding is actions related to this notice. On that listing is not warranted, in which December 7, 2004, we published our 12- DATES: We will accept comments on case we need not take any further action month finding on a petition to list seven these resubmitted petition findings at on the petition. The second possibility foreign species of Swallowtail any time. is that we may find that listing is butterflies as threatened or endangered ADDRESSES: Submit any comments, warranted, in which case we must (69 FR 70580). We also published a information, and questions by mail to promptly publish a proposed rule to list proposed rule on November 22, 2006, to the Chief, Division of Scientific the species. Once we publish a list six foreign bird species as Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife proposed rule for a species, section endangered (71 FR 67530). Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 4(b)(5) and (6) govern further 750, Arlington, Virginia 22203; by fax to procedures, regardless of whether or not Findings on Resubmitted Petitions 703–358–2276; or by e-mail to we issued the proposal in response to This review describes our resubmitted [email protected]. Comments the petition. The third possibility is that petition findings for 56 foreign species and supporting information will be we may find that listing is warranted for which we had previously found available for public inspection, by but precluded. A warranted-but- listing to be warranted but precluded. appointment, Monday through Friday precluded finding means that We have considered all of the new VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:36 Apr 20, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23APP2.SGM 23APP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules 20185 information we have obtained since the on the wing at sea. The only time they Fiji petrel (Pterodroma macgillivrayi) previous findings. As a result of our spend any significant amount of time on The Fiji petrel is a marine species and review, we find that warranted-but- land is to breed and rear young, and presumably pelagic (del Hoyo et al. precluded findings remain appropriate these species require specific islands for 1992). It was originally known from just for 50 species. We emphasize that we reproduction and rearing fledglings. one specimen collected in 1855 on Gau are not proposing these species for Procellarids are long-lived species with Island and more recently from eight listing by this review, but we do low reproductive rates and juvenile records of sightings on the island since anticipate developing and publishing mortality is often high due to predation 1983 (BirdLife International 2000). The proposed listing rules for these species by introduced mammalian species. As is only other record is a reported sighting in the future, with an objective of common for all island nesting avian at sea over 200 km north of Gau progressively and conclusively species, they are vulnerable to (Watling 2000, as cited in BirdLife addressing all 50 foreign species within stochastic events, such as typhoons, International 2000). The Fiji petrel’s a reasonable time-frame. which could result in rapid population breeding grounds have not been Also as a result of this review, we find declines or unforeseen species discovered, but may be located in areas that for six species, listing is warranted. extinctions (Birdlife International 2006). of undisturbed mature forest, on rocky, We will promptly publish proposals to Based on information gathered and mountainous ground, or in the cloud list six species in the Family assessed since May 21, 2004 and forest highlands of Gau Island (del Hoyo Procellariidae (tube-nosed seabirds). December 7, 2004, we have updated our et al. 1992, Rare 2006). The species is These species include: the Fiji petrel determinations of whether listing of classified as Critically Endangered by (Pterodroma macgillivrayi), the these taxa continues to be warranted or the IUCN because it is inferred, given Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris), warranted but precluded, or whether the paucity of recent records, that there Cook’s petrel (Pterodroma cookii), the listing is no longer warranted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a Heterogeneous Area Between Two Biodiversity Hotspots in Minas Gerais, Brazil
    ARTICLE Butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a heterogeneous area between two biodiversity hotspots in Minas Gerais, Brazil Déborah Soldati¹³; Fernando Amaral da Silveira¹⁴ & André Roberto Melo Silva² ¹ Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Sistemática de Insetos. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. ² Centro Universitário UNA, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-5840. E-mail: [email protected] ³ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-2376. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author). ⁴ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-2656. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This paper investigates the butterfly fauna of the ‘Serra do Rola-Moça’ State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. We eval- uate i) the seasonal variation of species richness and composition; and ii) the variation in composition of the local butterfly assemblage among three sampling sites and between the dry and rainy seasons. Sampling was carried out monthly between November 2012 and October 2013, using entomological nets. After a total sampling effort of 504 net hours, 311 species were recorded. One of them is endangered in Brazil, and eight are probable new species. Furthermore, two species were new records for the region and eight considered endemic of the Cerrado domain. There was no significant difference in species richness between the dry and the rainy seasons, however the species composition varies significantly among sampling sites. Due to its special, heterogeneous environment, which is home to a rich butterfly fauna, its preservation is important for the conservation of the regional butterfly fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermit Thrush (<Em>Catharus Guttatus</Em>) and Veery (<Em>C
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2010 Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests. Andrew J. Laughlin East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Laughlin, Andrew J., "Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests." (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1695. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1695 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests __________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree Masters of Science in Biological Sciences _________________ by Andrew J. Laughlin May 2010 __________________ Dr. Fred J. Alsop III, Chair Dr. Istvan Karsai Dr. Thomas F. Laughlin Keywords: Birds, Habitat Partitioning, Principal Components Analysis ABSTRACT Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Veery (C. fuscescens) Breeding Habitat Associations in Southern Appalachian High-Elevation Forests by Andrew J. Laughlin The Hermit Thrush is a new breeding bird in the Southern Appalachian high-elevation mountains, having expanded its range southward over the last few decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Argentina - Parte Vii: Papilionidae
    LEPIDOPTERA ARGENTINA Catálogo ilustrado y comentado de las mariposas de Argentina Parte VII: PAPILIONIDAE Fernando César Penco Osvaldo Di Iorio 2014 PLAN GENERAL DE LA OBRA Parte I CASTNIIDAE Parte II COSSIDAE & LIMACODIDAE Parte III TORTRICIDAE Parte IV SEMATURIDAE & URANIIDAE Parte V GEOMETRIDAE Parte VI HESPERIIDAE Parte VII PAPILIONIDAE Parte VIII PIERIDAE Parte IX LYCAENIDAE Parte X RIODINIDAE Parte XI NYMPHALIDAE & LIBYTHEIDAE Parte XII MEGALOPYGIDAE Parte XIII APATELODIDAE, MIMALLONIDAE & LASIOCAMPIDAE Parte XIV SATURNIIDAE Parte XV SPHINGIDAE Parte XVI EREBIDAE: ARCTIINAE & EREBINAE Parte XVII NOTODONTIDAE Parte XVIII NOCTUIDAE Parte XIX TAXONOMIA DE LEPIDOPTERA Parte XX BIBLIOGRAFIA LEPIDOPTERA ARGENTINA Catálogo ilustrado y comentado de las mariposas de Argentina Parte VII: PAPILIONIDAE Fernando César Penco Osvaldo R. Di Iorio 2014 Copyright © 2014 Fernando César Penco Ninguna parte de esta publicación, incluido el diseño de la portada y de las páginas interiores puede ser reproducida, almacenadas o transmitida de ninguna forma ni por ningún medio, sea éste electrónico, mecánico, grabación, fotocopia o cualquier otro sin la previa autorización escrita del autor. LEPIDOPTERA ARGENTINA - PARTE VII: PAPILIONIDAE Autores: Fernando César Penco Area de Biodiversidad, Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] Osvaldo R. Di Iorio Entomología, Departamento de Biodiversidad
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-21478, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic and Foreign Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this candidate notice of review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, and by allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting earlier candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. This document also includes our findings on resubmitted petitions and describes our 1 progress in revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the period October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PCN Magnolia Multisite
    Institution name plant NAMES for inventory::print name Accession # Provenanc Quantity Plant source The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 2005-355UN*A G 1 Unknown The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 2001-188UN*A U 1 Unknown The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 96-129*A G 1 Princeton Nurseries The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 99-203*B G 1 Longwood Gardens The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 93-206*A G 1 Woodlanders Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 'Brenda'2004-239*A G 1 Pat McCracken The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Anilou' College 2008-202*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Anilou' College 2008-202*B G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Ann' College 68-165*A G 1 U. S. National Arboretum, Washington, DC The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Banana College Split' 2004-237*A G 1 Pat McCracken The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Betty' College 68-166*A G 1 U. S. National Arboretum, Washington, DC The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Big Dude' College 2008-203*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore ×brooklynensis College 'Black Beauty' 2008-204*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore ×soulangeana College 'Jurmag1' 2010-069*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore
    [Show full text]
  • Agro-Ecological Zones of Bhutan Zones (AEZ) Based Mainly on Altitude As Shown in Table 2.1 and Map 5
    Part Two OVERVIEW OF BHUTAN Country-wide Characteristics Physical features Bhutan is a mountainous and landlocked Himalayan country situated between latitude 26°40’ and 28°15’N and longitude 88°45’ and 92°10’E. It borders the Tibet Autonomous Region of China to the north and the Indian states of Assam, West Bengal, Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim to the south (Map 1). The country spans about 300 km from east to west and 170 km from north to south with a total land area of 40,973 sq.km* (Source: RNR Census 2000). The terrain is highly rugged and steep with very little flat area for productive agricultural farming. Elevation throughout the country ranges from less than 100 masl (in the south) to above 7000 masl in the north (Map 2). The country can be divided into three distinct physiographic regions on the basis of altitude and corresponding rainfall and temperature. The southern foothills range in altitude from less than 100m to about 2000 masl and comprise the Siwalik Hills together with a narrow band of flat plains along the Indian border. The inner Himalayas make up the main river valleys and steep hills and rise in elevation from about 2000 to 4000m. The great Himalayas to the north along the Tibetan border consist of snow capped peaks and alpine rangelands above around 4000m (Map 3). For administrative purposes, Bhutan is divided into twenty districts called dzongkhags, which are further subdivided into 202 sub-districts or blocks called geogs. The district and block boundaries are shown in Map 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dugong Debacle: Lessons in the Extraterritorial Application of Section 402 of the National Historic Preservation Act As Illustrated in Dugong V
    DUGONG DEBACLE: LESSONS IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF SECTION 402 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT AS ILLUSTRATED IN DUGONG V. GATES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Nicole Elizabeth Moore August 2009 © 2009 Nicole Elizabeth Moore ABSTRACT In September of 2003, a multi-national group comprised of Okinawan residents, international environmental groups, and Japanese environmental lawyers sued the U.S. Department of Defense declaring that it had violated Section 402 of the National Historic Preservation Act as it failed to take into account the potential adverse effects a new military base would have on the Okinawa dugong. This work simultaneously explores the legal proceedings and argumentation presented in lawsuit, Dugong v. Gates, and highlights the impacts of the long-time social and political relationship between Okinawans, the Government of Japan and the United States military as they relate to this unprecedented case. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Nicole Moore was born and raised in Englewood, Colorado and a graduate of Englewood High School, 1999. She continued her studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder graduating in three years with a B.A. in History in 2002. Nicole worked in operations and marketing for several years before moving to Ithaca, New York to pursue a graduate degree in Historic Preservation Planning from Cornell University’s City and Regional Planning Department. Nicole currently lives in Los Angeles, California. iii This work is dedicated to Keith, Joyce, Audrey, Lydia and Sundi. Without your loving support, my path would not have led so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Oni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2
    (2018) 29: 11–18 NESTING ECOLOGY OF THE ENDANGERED CHILEAN WOODSTAR (EULIDIA YARRELLII) Cristián F. Estades1,2 ∙ Ilenia Lazzoni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología de Vida Silvestre, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Av. Santa Rosa 11315, La Pintana, Santiago, Chile. 2 AvesChile (Chilean Ornithologists' Union), Santiago, Chile. E-mail: Cristián F. Estades∙[email protected] Abstract ∙ The Chilean Woodstar (Eulidia yarrellii) is a critically endangered hummingbird of the Atacama desert in northern Chile, with a population estimate of around 320 individuals in 2017. To generate useful information for the design of population-recovery actions, we conducted a study of the nesting ecology of the species between 2006 and 2008. Our specific goals were to provide a quantitative descrip- tion of the species breeding habitat, to describe the basic breeding biology of the species, and to assess the current levels of nesting success. Most of our work was conducted in the valleys of Azapa and Vitor, two of the three last valleys where the species is known to persist. Alt- hough we recorded some juveniles in Azapa, we only observed the species nesting in one site in Chaca (Vitor valley), in a small (1.4 ha) olive grove where 13–20 simultaneous nests were found during the studied breeding seasons. Nesting occurs in September–October, and its tim- ing is apparently synchronized with the flowering of chañar (Geoffroea decorticans). The species has a particularly long breeding period with an average of 48 days (17 d for the egg stage, 31 d for the nestling stage).
    [Show full text]
  • Nansei Islands Biological Diversity Evaluation Project Report 1 Chapter 1
    Introduction WWF Japan’s involvement with the Nansei Islands can be traced back to a request in 1982 by Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh. The “World Conservation Strategy”, which was drafted at the time through a collaborative effort by the WWF’s network, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), posed the notion that the problems affecting environments were problems that had global implications. Furthermore, the findings presented offered information on precious environments extant throughout the globe and where they were distributed, thereby providing an impetus for people to think about issues relevant to humankind’s harmonious existence with the rest of nature. One of the precious natural environments for Japan given in the “World Conservation Strategy” was the Nansei Islands. The Duke of Edinburgh, who was the President of the WWF at the time (now President Emeritus), naturally sought to promote acts of conservation by those who could see them through most effectively, i.e. pertinent conservation parties in the area, a mandate which naturally fell on the shoulders of WWF Japan with regard to nature conservation activities concerning the Nansei Islands. This marked the beginning of the Nansei Islands initiative of WWF Japan, and ever since, WWF Japan has not only consistently performed globally-relevant environmental studies of particular areas within the Nansei Islands during the 1980’s and 1990’s, but has put pressure on the national and local governments to use the findings of those studies in public policy. Unfortunately, like many other places throughout the world, the deterioration of the natural environments in the Nansei Islands has yet to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference File
    References added since publication of 2007 CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses Abadie, K. B., J. Pérez Z., and M. Valverde. 2006. Primer reporte de colonias del Martín Peruano Progne murphyi. Cotinga 24:99-101. Ackerman, J. T., J. Y. Takekawa, J. D. Bluso, J. L. Yee, and C. A. Eagles-Smith. 2008. Gender identification of Caspian Terns using external morphology and discriminant function analysis. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:378-383. Alarcos, S., C. de la Cruz, E. Solís, J. Valencia, and M. J. García-Baquero. 2007. Sex determination of Iberian Azure-winged Magpies Cyanopica cyanus cooki by discriminant analysis of external measurements. Ringing & Migration 23:211-216. Albayrak, T., A. Besnard, and A. Erdoğan. 2011. Morphometric variation and population relationships of Krüeper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in Turkey. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 123:734-740. Aleixo, A., C. E. B. Portes, A. Whittaker, J. D. Weckstein, L. Pedreira Gonzaga, K. J. Zimmer, C. C. Ribas, and J. M. Bates. 2013. Molecular systematics and taxonomic revision of the Curve-billed Scythebill complex (Campylorhamphus procurvoides: Dendrocolaptidae), with description of a new species from western Amazonian Brazil. Pp. 253-257, In: del Hoyo, J., A Elliott, J. Sargatal, and D.A. Christie (eds). Handbook of the birds of the world. Special volume: new species and global index. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. Volume 1. Alfano, A. 2014. Pygmy Nightjar (Nyctopolus hirundinaeus). Neotropical Birds Online (T.S. Schulenberg, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Alvarenga, H. M. F., E. Höfling, and L. F. Silveira. 2002. Notharchus swainsoni (Gray, 1846) é uma espécie válida.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Urged to Protect 19 Foreign Species
    Via electronic and certified mail February 3, 2021 Scott de la Vega Director Acting Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Don Morgan Chief, Branch of Delisting and Foreign Martha Williams Species, Ecological Services Principal Deputy Director 5275 Leesburg Pike U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 1849 C Street, NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Re: Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to Sue for Failing to Make Timely 12-Month Findings on Foreign Candidate Species in Violation of the Endangered Species Act Dear Acting Secretary de la Vega, Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Principal Deputy Director Williams, and Chief Morgan, On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center), we write to notify you that the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (together, the Service) are currently in violation of Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for failing to make required 12-month findings on 19 foreign candidate species (Table 1). Section 4(b)(3) of the ESA requires the Service to determine if ESA protections are warranted for a species within 12 months of previously finding that listing was precluded by other pending proposals.1 Here, the Service found listing of 19 foreign species was warranted but precluded on October 10, 2019, and thus new listing determinations were due by October 10, 2020—nearly four months ago.
    [Show full text]