DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 200/Monday, October 17, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 200/Monday, October 17, 2016 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 71457 for the relevant maintenance period in attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS Technology Transfer and Advancement with mobile source emissions at the through 2030. Finally, EPA finds Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because levels of the MVEBs. adequate and is proposing to approve application of those requirements would the newly-established 2020 and 2030 be inconsistent with the CAA; and C. What is a safety margin? MVEBs for the Cleveland area. • Does not provide EPA with the A ‘‘safety margin’’ is the difference discretionary authority to address, as VII. Statutory and Executive Order between the attainment level of appropriate, disproportionate human Reviews emissions (from all sources) and the health or environmental effects, using projected level of emissions (from all Under the CAA, redesignation of an practicable and legally permissible sources) in the maintenance plan. As area to attainment and the methods, under Executive Order 12898 noted in Table 11, the emissions in the accompanying approval of a (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Cleveland area are projected to have maintenance plan under section In addition, the SIP is not approved safety margins of 117.22 TPSD for NOX 107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the to apply on any Indian reservation land and 28.48 TPSD for VOC in 2030 (the status of a geographical area and do not or in any other area where EPA or an total net change between the attainment impose any additional regulatory Indian tribe has demonstrated that a year, 2014, emissions and the projected requirements on sources beyond those tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 2030 emissions for all sources in the imposed by state law. A redesignation to Indian country, this rule does not have Cleveland area). Similarly, there is a attainment does not in and of itself tribal implications as specified by safety margin of 89.24 TPSD for NOX create any new requirements, but rather Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, and 11.61 TPSD for VOC in 2020. Even results in the applicability of November 9, 2000), because if emissions reached the full level of the requirements contained in the CAA for redesignation is an action that affects safety margin, the counties would still areas that have been redesignated to the status of a geographical area and demonstrate maintenance since attainment. Moreover, the Administrator does not impose any new regulatory emission levels would equal those in is required to approve a SIP submission requirements on tribes, impact any the attainment year. that complies with the provisions of the existing sources of air pollution on As shown in Table 12 above, Ohio is CAA and applicable Federal regulations. tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance allocating a portion of that safety margin 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). of ozone NAAQS in tribal lands. to the mobile source sector. Specifically, Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, in 2020, Ohio is allocating 5.07 TPSD EPA’s role is to approve state choices, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 and 8.03 TPSD of the VOC and NOX provided that they meet the criteria of Environmental protection, Air safety margins, respectively. In 2030, the CAA. Accordingly, this action pollution control, Incorporation by Ohio is allocating 4.02 TPSD and 5.72 merely approves state law as meeting reference, Intergovernmental relations, TPSD of the VOC and NOX safety Federal requirements and does not Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Volatile margins, respectively. Ohio EPA is not impose additional requirements beyond organic compounds. requesting allocation to the MVEBs of those imposed by state law. For that Dated: October 5, 2016. the entire available safety margins reason, this action: reflected in the demonstration of • Is not a significant regulatory action Robert A. Kaplan, maintenance. In fact, the amount subject to review by the Office of Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. allocated to the MVEBs represents only Management and Budget under [FR Doc. 2016–24914 Filed 10–14–16; 8:45 am] a small portion of the 2020 and 2030 Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, BILLING CODE P safety margins. Therefore, even though October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, the State is requesting MVEBs that January 21, 2011); exceed the projected on-road mobile • Does not impose an information DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR source emissions for 2020 and 2030 collection burden under the provisions contained in the demonstration of of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Fish and Wildlife Service maintenance, the increase in on-road U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); mobile source emissions that can be • Is certified as not having a 50 CFR Part 17 considered for transportation significant economic impact on a conformity purposes is well within the [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0072; substantial number of small entities 4500030115] safety margins of the ozone maintenance under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 demonstration. Further, once allocated U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Endangered and Threatened Wildlife to mobile sources, these safety margins • Does not contain any unfunded and Plants; Review of Foreign Species will not be available for use by other mandate or significantly or uniquely That Are Candidates for Listing as sources. affect small governments, as described Endangered or Threatened; Annual VI. Proposed Actions in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Notification of Findings on of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Resubmitted Petitions; Annual EPA is proposing to determine that • Does not have Federalism Description of Progress on Listing the Cleveland area has met the implications as specified in Executive Actions requirements for redesignation under Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA is 1999); AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, thus proposing to approve Ohio’s • Is not an economically significant Interior. request to change the legal designation regulatory action based on health or ACTION: Notification of review. of the Cleveland area from safety risks subject to Executive Order nonattainment to attainment for the 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); SUMMARY: In this Candidate Notice of 2008 ozone standard. EPA is also • Is not a significant regulatory action Review of Foreign Species (CNOR–FS), proposing to approve, as a revision to subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR we present an updated list of plant and the Ohio SIP, the state’s maintenance 28355, May 22, 2001); animal species foreign to the United plan for the area. The maintenance plan • Is not subject to requirements of States that we regard as candidates for is designed to keep the Cleveland area Section 12(d) of the National addition to the Lists of Endangered and VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:20 Oct 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM 17OCP1 jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 71458 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules Threatened Wildlife and Plants under one candidate from the list due to (warranted but precluded), and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as recovery, and we are adding a species expeditious progress is being made to amended. Identification of candidate that was originally considered to be one add or remove qualified species from species can assist conservation planning taxon but has recently been determined the List (See Preclusion and Expeditious efforts by providing advance notice of to be two full species. Additionally, in Progress below). potential listings and awareness of this CNOR–FS, we have assigned a In accordance with section species’ status. Even if we subsequently listing priority number (LPN) to the new 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act, when, in list a candidate species, the early notice candidate species and have changed the response to a petition, we find that provided here could result in more LPNs for three candidate species. listing a species is warranted but options for species management and precluded, we must make a new 12- Background recovery by prompting measures to month finding annually until we alleviate threats to the species. The Endangered Species Act of 1973, publish a proposed rule to list the DATES: We will accept information on as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et species or make a determination that any of the species in this Candidate seq.), requires that we identify species listing is not warranted. These Notice of Review of Foreign Species at of wildlife and plants that are subsequent 12-month findings are any time. endangered or threatened based on the referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ petition best available scientific and commercial ADDRESSES: Document availability: This findings. This CNOR–FS contains our CNOR–FS and supporting information. As defined in section 3 of resubmitted petition findings for foreign documentation, including more detailed the Act, an endangered species is any species previously described in the information on these candidate species species that is in danger of extinction Annual Notice of Review published and the references cited, is available on throughout all or a significant portion of April 25, 2013 (78 FR 24604). the Internet at http:// its range, and a threatened species is We maintain this list of candidates for www.regulations.gov at Docket No. any species that is likely to become an a variety of reasons: FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0072. Please submit endangered species within the (1) To notify the public that these foreseeable future throughout all or a any new information, materials, species are facing threats to their significant portion of its range. Through comments, or questions on this CNOR– survival; the Federal rulemaking process, we add FS and the supporting documentation to (2) to provide advance knowledge of species that meet these definitions to the Falls Church, VA, address listed in potential listings; the List of Endangered and Threatened (3) to provide information that may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11 or the List of stimulate and guide conservation efforts below.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-21478, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic and Foreign Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this candidate notice of review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, and by allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting earlier candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. This document also includes our findings on resubmitted petitions and describes our 1 progress in revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the period October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanya Sanerib (DC Bar No
    Case 4:21-cv-00251-RCC Document 1 Filed 06/23/21 Page 1 of 20 1 Sarah Uhlemann (DC Bar No. 501328)* Tanya Sanerib (DC Bar No. 473506)* 2 Center for Biological Diversity 3 2400 NW 80th Street, #146 Seattle, WA 98117 4 Phone: (206) 327-2344 5 (206) 379-7363 Email: [email protected] 6 [email protected] *Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 11 TUCSON DIVISION 12 13 Center for Biological Diversity, 14 Plaintiff, Case No. 15 v. 16 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 17 Debra Haaland, in her official capacity 18 as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, 19 Defendants. 20 21 INTRODUCTION 22 1. Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity challenges the failure of the U.S. 23 Fish and Wildlife Service and the Secretary of the Interior Debra Haaland (collectively 24 “the Service” or “Defendants”) to make required, 12-month findings as to whether seven 25 foreign wildlife species “warrant” listing under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). 26 These species have been on the Service’s “candidate” list awaiting ESA protections for 27 28 1 Case 4:21-cv-00251-RCC Document 1 Filed 06/23/21 Page 2 of 20 1 decades, even though the Service has acknowledged that each qualifies for full ESA 2 listing. 3 2. The Okinawa woodpecker, Kaiser-i-hind swallowtail, Jamaican kite 4 swallowtail, black-backed tanager, Harris’ mimic swallowtail, fluminense swallowtail, 5 and the southern helmeted curassow are each in danger of or threatened with extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Urged to Protect 19 Foreign Species
    Via electronic and certified mail February 3, 2021 Scott de la Vega Director Acting Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Don Morgan Chief, Branch of Delisting and Foreign Martha Williams Species, Ecological Services Principal Deputy Director 5275 Leesburg Pike U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 1849 C Street, NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Re: Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to Sue for Failing to Make Timely 12-Month Findings on Foreign Candidate Species in Violation of the Endangered Species Act Dear Acting Secretary de la Vega, Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Principal Deputy Director Williams, and Chief Morgan, On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center), we write to notify you that the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (together, the Service) are currently in violation of Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for failing to make required 12-month findings on 19 foreign candidate species (Table 1). Section 4(b)(3) of the ESA requires the Service to determine if ESA protections are warranted for a species within 12 months of previously finding that listing was precluded by other pending proposals.1 Here, the Service found listing of 19 foreign species was warranted but precluded on October 10, 2019, and thus new listing determinations were due by October 10, 2020—nearly four months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Guia Para Observação Das Aves Do Parque Nacional De Brasília
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234145690 Guia para observação das aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília Book · January 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 629 4 authors, including: Mieko Kanegae Fernando Lima Favaro Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Bi… 7 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 69 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Fernando Lima Favaro on 28 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Brasília - 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA Aílton C. de Oliveira Mieko Ferreira Kanegae Marina Faria do Amaral Fernando de Lima Favaro Fotografia de Aves Marcelo Pontes Monteiro Nélio dos Santos Paulo André Lima Borges Brasília, 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO APRESENTAÇÃO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA É com grande satisfação que apresento o Guia para Observação REPÚblica FEDERATiva DO BRASIL das Aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília, o qual representa um importante instrumento auxiliar para os observadores de aves que frequentam ou que Presidente frequentarão o Parque, para fins de lazer (birdwatching), pesquisas científicas, Dilma Roussef treinamentos ou em atividades de educação ambiental. Este é mais um resultado do trabalho do Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Vice-Presidente Conservação de Aves Silvestres - CEMAVE, unidade descentralizada do Instituto Michel Temer Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) e vinculada à Diretoria de Conservação da Biodiversidade. O Centro tem como missão Ministério do Meio Ambiente - MMA subsidiar a conservação das aves brasileiras e dos ambientes dos quais elas Izabella Mônica Vieira Teixeira dependem.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 154/Wednesday, August 12, 2009
    40540 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR questions concerning this notice to the precluded finding on a petition to list above address. means that listing is warranted, but that Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the immediate proposal and timely Chief, Branch of Listing, Endangered promulgation of a final regulation is 50 CFR Part 17 Species Program, (see ADDRESSES); by precluded by higher priority listing [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0057] telephone at 703-358-2171; or by actions. In making a warranted-but [90100 16641FLA-B6] facsimile at 703-358-1735). Persons who precluded finding under the Act, the use a telecommunications device for the Service must demonstrate that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife deaf (TDD) may call the Federal expeditious progress is being made to and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800- add and remove species from the lists of on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign 877-8339. endangered and threatened wildlife and Species; Annual Description of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: plants. Progress on Listing Actions Pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Background Act, when, in response to a petition, we AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Endangered Species Act of 1973, find that listing a species is warranted Interior. but precluded, we must make a new 12– ACTION: Notice of review. as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), provides two mechanisms for month finding annually until we SUMMARY: In this notice of review, we considering species for listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical News Neotropical News
    COTINGA 1 Neotropical News Neotropical News Brazilian Merganser in Argentina: If the survey’s results reflect the true going, going … status of Mergus octosetaceus in Argentina then there is grave cause for concern — local An expedition (Pato Serrucho ’93) aimed extinction, as in neighbouring Paraguay, at discovering the current status of the seems inevitable. Brazilian Merganser Mergus octosetaceus in Misiones Province, northern Argentina, During the expedition a number of sub­ has just returned to the U.K. Mergus tropical forest sites were surveyed for birds octosetaceus is one of the world’s rarest — other threatened species recorded during species of wildfowl, with a population now this period included: Black-fronted Piping- estimated to be less than 250 individuals guan Pipile jacutinga, Vinaceous Amazon occurring in just three populations, one in Amazona vinacea, Helmeted Woodpecker northern Argentina, the other two in south- Dryocopus galeatus, White-bearded central Brazil. Antshrike Biata s nigropectus, and São Paulo Tyrannulet Phylloscartes paulistus. Three conservation biologists from the U.K. and three South American counter­ PHIL BENSTEAD parts surveyed c.450 km of white-water riv­ Beaver House, Norwich Road, Reepham, ers and streams using an inflatable boat. Norwich, NR10 4JN, U.K. Despite exhaustive searching only one bird was located in an area peripheral to the species’s historical stronghold. Former core Black-breasted Puffleg found: extant areas (and incidently those with the most but seriously threatened. protection) for this species appear to have been adversely affected by the the Urugua- The Black-breasted Puffleg Eriocnemis í dam, which in 1989 flooded c.80 km of the nigrivestis has been recorded from just two Río Urugua-í.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016 SOUTHEAST BRAZIL: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna October 20th – November 8th, 2016 TOUR LEADER: Nick Athanas Report and photos by Nick Athanas Helmeted Woodpecker - one of our most memorable sightings of the tour It had been a couple of years since I last guided this tour, and I had forgotten how much fun it could be. We covered a lot of ground and visited a great series of parks, lodges, and reserves, racking up a respectable group list of 459 bird species seen as well as some nice mammals. There was a lot of rain in the area, but we had to consider ourselves fortunate that the rainiest days seemed to coincide with our long travel days, so it really didn’t cost us too much in the way of birds. My personal trip favorite sighting was our amazing and prolonged encounter with a rare Helmeted Woodpecker! Others of note included extreme close-ups of Spot-winged Wood-Quail, a surprise Sungrebe, multiple White-necked Hawks, Long-trained Nightjar, 31 species of antbirds, scope views of Variegated Antpitta, a point-blank Spotted Bamboowren, tons of colorful hummers and tanagers, TWO Maned Wolves at the same time, and Giant Anteater. This report is a bit light on text and a bit heavy of photos, mainly due to my insane schedule lately where I have hardly had any time at home, but all photos are from the tour. www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Tropical Birding Trip Report Southeast Brazil: Atlantic Rainforest and Savanna, Oct-Nov 2016 The trip started in the city of Curitiba.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Hatches for First Time in 4 Years at White Oak by Michael Stone
    Endangered Species Hatches for First Time in 4 Years at White Oak By Michael Stone A northern helmeted curassow chick hatched on July 23 at White Oak Conservation, marking the first time the endangered species has produced offspring at the center since 2009. “We’ve been patiently waiting for the male to do his job, and he finally did it,” bird specialist Andrew Schumann said. The fertile egg was laid about two weeks before it hatched. It was artificially incubated in a temperature-controlled setting and closely monitored to increase the chances of the chick hatching. During that time, the mom tended to a “dummy” egg, which was replaced with the real one right before it hatched. Helmeted chicks emerge from the shell “precocial,” meaning they’re already fairly developed. But the mom will still tend to her child in some ways, like with feeding, Schumann said. The chick hatched at 108 grams. As newborns, the species loses weight for the first few days but soon begins to increase its body mass by about 5 percent daily. Such rapid growth is common among bird species so they’ll be self-sufficient in the wild quicker, and animal specialists at White Oak often remark at how noticeably fast chick grow. At roughly 50, the captive U.S. population of helmeted curassows is fairly healthy, Schumann said, but having this chick hatch is nonetheless “exciting because it’s still an endangered species.” Only two helmeted chicks have ever hatched at White Oak—both in 2009 from the same mom as this year’s chick.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 3. List of Highly Threatened Predicted Eradication Beneficiaries
    Supplementary Table 3. List of highly threatened predicted eradication beneficiaries. * indicates populations found in both predicted beneficiaries and demonstrated beneficiaries analysis. Island name Country or Territory Common name Scientific name Animal Type IUCN Red List Status Amsterdam French Southern Territories Amsterdam albatross Diomedea Seabird CR amsterdamensis Amsterdam French Southern Territories Northern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes moseleyi Seabird EN Amsterdam French Southern Territories Sooty albatross Phoebetria fusca Seabird EN Amsterdam French Southern Territories Indian yellow-nosed albatross Thalassarche carteri Seabird EN Anacapa East United States Ashy storm-petrel Oceanodroma Seabird EN homochroa Anacapa Middle United States Ashy storm-petrel Oceanodroma Seabird EN homochroa Anacapa West United States Ashy storm-petrel* Oceanodroma Seabird EN homochroa Anatahan Northern Mariana Islands Micronesian megapode Megapodius laperouse Landbird EN Anatahan Northern Mariana Islands Marianas flying fox Pteropus mariannus Mammal EN Anchor New Zealand Yellowhead (mohua) Mohoua ochrocephala Landbird EN Anchor New Zealand Kakapo Strigops habroptila Landbird CR Aride Seychelles Seychelles magpie-robin* Copsychus sechellarum Landbird EN Aride Seychelles Seychelles wolf snake Lycognathophis Reptile EN seychellensis Attu United States Marbled murrelet Brachyramphus Seabird EN marmoratus Baltra Ecuador Galápagos martin Progne modesta Landbird EN Bay Cay Turks And Caicos Islands Turks and Caicos ground Cyclura carinata Reptile CR iguana Bench New Zealand Yellow-eyed penguin Megadyptes antipodes Seabird EN Bernier Australia Banded hare wallaby Lagostrophus fasciatus Mammal EN Bernier Australia Western barred bandicoot Perameles bougainville Mammal EN Big South Cape New Zealand New Zealand greater short- Mystacina robusta Mammal CR tailed bat Breaksea New Zealand Yellowhead (mohua)* Mohoua ochrocephala Landbird EN Browns New Zealand New Zealand dotterel Charadrius obscurus Landbird EN Buck (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 150/Monday, August 9, 2021
    43470 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 150 / Monday, August 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules How can I get copies of the proposed digital television service, including Federal Communications Commission. action and other related information? propagation characteristics that allow Thomas Horan, EPA has established a docket for this undesired signals and noise to be Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. receivable at relatively far distances and action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– Proposed Rule OAR–2021–0208. EPA has also nearby electrical devices to cause developed a website for this proposal, interference. According to the For the reasons discussed in the which is available at https:// Petitioner, it has received numerous preamble, the Federal Communications www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions- complaints of poor or no reception from Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule- viewers, and explains the importance of part 73 as follows: revise-existing-national-ghg-emissions. a strong over-the-air signal in the Portland area during emergencies, PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST Please refer to the notice of proposed SERVICES rulemaking for detailed information on when, it states, cable and satellite accessing information related to the service may go out of operation. Finally, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 proposal. the Petitioner demonstrated that the continues to read as follows: channel 21 noise limited contour would Dated: July 29, 2021. fully encompass the existing channel 12 Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, William Charmley, contour, and an analysis using the 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. Director, Assessment and Standards Division, Commission’s TVStudy software ■ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Information on the Distribution of Venezuelan Birds
    Some new information on the distribution of Venezuelan birds Peter Boesman Como resultado de la observación de aves en el campo durante los ultimos 10 años, se presenta un resumen de nuevos datos de distribución de aves en Venezuela. Los datos están organizados por area (20 en total), la mayoria de las areas son poco conocidas. Las observaciones de mayor importancia se detallan en ‘appendix 1’. En Falcón, la Serranía de San Luis tiene muchas más especies tipicas de las alturas sub-tropicales de la Cordillera de la Costa que previamente conocido, las serranias en el noreste de Falcón, de alturas bajas, tienen una avifauna abundante de especies de selva tropical, y areas de agua dulce en esta misma parte de Falcón y el norte de Carabobo son un refugio para muchas especies acuaticas poco conocidas. Los Andes en Lara y Trujillo no han sido estudiados tan profundamente como en Mérida, y por consecuencia se han descubierto importantes extensiones en la distribución de varias especies. En Mérida, se documenta indicaciones de una ruta migratoria muy importante a través del Valle del Río Santo Domingo. Las alturas bajas del Parque Nacional Tamá en Táchira (en el valle de los ríos Frio y Negro) y las areas adjacentes en Apure merecen mayor investigación en vista de algunas observaciones sorprendentes. Igualmente, los descubrimientos en islas del Río Orinoco fueron inesperados. La selva del Río Caura en el norte de Bolívar alberga especies previamente conocidas solamente del estado de Amazonas, y la región del Río Grande en el noreste de Bolívar tiene una avifauna tipicamente Guyanesa.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Birding 24 2 Neotropical Species ‘Uplisted’ to a Higher Category of Threat in the 2018 IUCN Red List Update
    >> FEATURE RED LIST 2018 The 2018 IUCN Red List in the Neotropics James Lowen, Hannah Wheatley, Claudia Hermes, Ian Burfield and David Wege Neotropical Birding 21 featured a summary of the key implications for the Neotropics of the 2016 IUCN Red List for birds. This article briefs readers on the main changes from the 2018 update. s part of its role as the IUCN Red List BirdLife’s Red List team updated the Authority for birds, BirdLife International information available for roughly 2,300 species A is responsible for assessing the global worldwide. Globally, this resulted in changes to conservation status of each of the world’s 11,000 the categorisation of 89 species; 58 species were or so bird species, allocating each to a category ‘uplisted’ to a higher category of threat, whilst ranging from Least Concern to Extinct. The latest roughly half that number – 31 species – were update was published in November 2018 (BirdLife ‘downlisted’. In the Neotropics, 13 species were International 2018). Although much more modest uplisted (Fig. 2) and slightly more – 18 – were in reach than the comprehensive update carried downlisted (Fig. 5). Now let’s take a closer look at out in 2016, whose Neotropical dimension was the individual changes, largely using information discussed in Symes et al. (2017), the 2018 revamp made available on BirdLife’s ‘Globally Threatened contains a suite of interesting changes for species Bird Forums’ (8 globally-threatened-bird- occurring in the Neotropical Bird Club region that forums.birdlife.org). Is the picture quite as rosy as are worth drawing to readers’ collective attention.
    [Show full text]