DOCSLIB.ORG

TEXT of MR. LEE KUAN YEW's SPEECH at a MASS RALLY at PETALING JAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, on 11TH APRIL, 1964. the Next Nine Years Will

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TEXT of MR. LEE KUAN YEW's SPEECH at a MASS RALLY at PETALING JAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, on 11TH APRIL, 1964. the Next Nine Years Will 1 TEXT OF MR. LEE KUAN YEW'S SPEECH AT A MASS RALLY AT PETALING JAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, ON 11TH APRIL, 1964. The next nine years will be different from the last nine This is the last lap of the election campaign with two weeks to go before polling. Barring accidents, the mood of the people is unlikely to change and in fact the dye is already cast. Why Socialist Front had barracked the PAP One notable feature in this campaign is that the Socialist Front and their Communist cadres in the towns have barracked and tried to disorganise only PAP rallies in Penang, Malacca and Jinjang. They have never bothered with the MCA or any of the other parties. Unwittingly, by their actions they have added proof, if proof was needed, that they know the one party with programme, policy and intellectual content, to counter them and deflate their following, is the PAP. Having seen what has happened to Barisan Sosialis in Singapore, where they had their best trained cadres operating their best organised open front outfit, they are fearful of even allowing us to put our ideas across to the people. They would lky/1964/lky0411.doc 2 prefer the MCA to win as against the PAP knowing that the greed and ineptitude of the MCA will help swell dissatisfaction and build them support. So it was anti- Communists like Tun Lim Yew Hock who built up the strength of the Communist front organisations in Singapore. MCA prefer Socialist Front to win Ironically, on the other side, the MCA have revealed in their speeches a preference for Socialist Front as against the PAP. They prefer to let the Communists win. As Mr. Tan Siew Sin admitted in last Tuesday's papers, had the Barisan Sosialis won in Singapore, the people of Singapore knew that the Constitution would have been suspended and troops would have marched in, confirming what we have always said was their intention, i.e. to split the non- Communist vote, allowing Barisan Sosialis to win and then apply a simple surgical operation. Their anti-Communist expert is no less than Mr. Khaw Khai Boh, Director of Special Branch in the days of Tun Lim Yew Hock. He was reported in last Thursday's papers to have said that the PAP was a "neo-Communist Party" and "it had adopted Communist methods pandering to mass emotion as a means of controlling them". Here is an anti-Communist expert who condemns by implication competition against the Communists to win mass support and deny it to the lky/1964/lky0411.doc 3 Communists. Small wonder that the battle for hearts and minds never even started when he was Director of Special Branch in Singapore. Who will make and who will break Malaysia? UMNO must decide whether the threat to Malaysia are the Communist or the Chinese. If one were to take seriously the recent statements attributed to sober and responsible leaders in UMNO, doubts can arise as to whether these leaders consider the Communists and their united front organisations like the Socialist Front, to be a threat or the non-Communist socialist party, like the PAP, which can compete with the Communists and rally the urban population. It is alleged that we have made an appeal to Chinese communalism. Is this true? Is it the PAP or the Socialist Front that has plugged the line about the government killing Chinese education in these elections? Perhaps the MCA translators have not drawn the attention of UMNO leaders to the long diatribes issued by the Socialist Front on the Government' policy which they alleged have killed Chinese education. And it is other parties who have attacked Malay rights in the Constitution. lky/1964/lky0411.doc 4 Whatever our faults it is not communalism or chauvinism. In Singapore where the Malay vote is only 15%, we have honored Malay rights and give all Malays free education from primary to university level, something the Central Government cannot do. Our sin, it would appear, is to be able to muster a following in the urban areas which includes a large bulk of the Chinese. UMNO must distinguish between Chinese and Communists If some of the statements recently made had been printed at any other but election time, I would have been forced to conclude that a harmonious multi- racial society in Malaysia was not going to survive. From these statements, it would appear that it would better for the Chinese in the towns to be won over by a Communist group, like the Socialist Front disloyal to Malaysia, who can be dealt with summarily than to be won over by a non-Communist socialist party loyal to Malaysia like the PAP. And yet it is the PAP in these elections that has gone out of its way to explain realistically why Malay rights in the Constitution must be honoured if the Tunku's and Tun Razak's leadership is to continue to succeed, and why in fact it is wise for this generation to have a Malay as the Prime Minister of the country. Different problems in the next nine years lky/1964/lky0411.doc 5 However, election time is not the best time for balanced judicious statements. I am confident that there are men big enough to see the need for effective counters to our real long-term problems of Communist subversion by legal or illegal methods now complicated by the addition of Indonesian subversion on the Malay mass base. Quality of anti-Communist and non-Communist leadership must improve One recurring theme in the election speeches of many government leaders is that they must be voted back to power, otherwise disaster befalls the country. We all know that there is no alternative Malay leadership willing and capable of running a multi-racial society. However, we would have been happier to have heard what they intend to do in the next five years to meet the problems which will be so different from the last five years. One of these problems is the change in the quality of Communist leadership. Nine years ago in 1955, when the Tunku first assumed office as Chief Minister and then Prime Minister, the Communists were led by people who had not been educated beyond secondary school. Many were not even middle school graduates, having grown up in the movement which they joined as rubber tappers lky/1964/lky0411.doc 6 or manual workers. A new generation of Communist leaders is emerging, people educated in universities like Nanyang, Singapore, Malaya, and elsewhere abroad. They will no longer be simple bicycle shop mechanics. So too the leadership in UMNO and in the non-Communist parties like the PAP must improve to match higher intellects on the other side. One of the happier features in this election is the introduction amongst the UMNO candidates of a few of the younger intelligentsia, the professional man and the university graduate, men who could give added intellectual content for the programmes and policies of UMNO. Without this capacity to calculate and evaluate the new problems that we face and devise new solutions to meet these problems, we are in for serious trouble. 11th April, 1964. lky/1964/lky0411.doc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Singapore, July 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's Chinese-Speaking and Their Perspectives on Merger
    Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies, Volume 5, 2011-12 南方華裔研究雜志, 第五卷, 2011-12 “Flesh and Bone Reunite as One Body”: Singapore’s Chinese- speaking and their Perspectives on Merger ©2012 Thum Ping Tjin* Abstract Singapore’s Chinese speakers played the determining role in Singapore’s merger with the Federation. Yet the historiography is silent on their perspectives, values, and assumptions. Using contemporary Chinese- language sources, this article argues that in approaching merger, the Chinese were chiefly concerned with livelihoods, education, and citizenship rights; saw themselves as deserving of an equal place in Malaya; conceived of a new, distinctive, multiethnic Malayan identity; and rejected communist ideology. Meanwhile, the leaders of UMNO were intent on preserving their electoral dominance and the special position of Malays in the Federation. Finally, the leaders of the PAP were desperate to retain power and needed the Federation to remove their political opponents. The interaction of these three factors explains the shape, structure, and timing of merger. This article also sheds light on the ambiguity inherent in the transfer of power and the difficulties of national identity formation in a multiethnic state. Keywords: Chinese-language politics in Singapore; History of Malaya; the merger of Singapore and the Federation of Malaya; Decolonisation Introduction Singapore’s merger with the Federation of Malaya is one of the most pivotal events in the country’s history. This process was determined by the ballot box – two general elections, two by-elections, and a referendum on merger in four years. The centrality of the vote to this process meant that Singapore’s Chinese-speaking1 residents, as the vast majority of the colony’s residents, played the determining role.
    [Show full text]
  • The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore
    Damien Cheong ____________________________________________________________ Selling Security: The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore DAMIEN CHEONG Abstract The Internal Security Act (ISA) of Singapore has been transformed from a se- curity law into an effective political instrument of the Singapore government. Although the government's use of the ISA for political purposes elicited negative reactions from the public, it was not prepared to abolish, or make amendments to the Act. In the wake of September 11 and the international campaign against terrorism, the opportunity to (re)legitimize the government's use of the ISA emerged. This paper argues that despite the ISA's seeming importance in the fight against terrorism, the absence of explicit definitions of national security threats, either in the Act itself, or in accompanying legislation, renders the ISA susceptible to political misuse. Keywords: Internal Security Act, War on Terrorism. People's Action Party, Jemaah Islamiyah. Introduction In 2001/2002, the Singapore government arrested and detained several Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) operatives under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for engaging in terrorist activities. It was alleged that the detained operatives were planning to attack local and foreign targets in Singa- pore. The arrests outraged human rights groups, as the operation was reminiscent of the government's crackdown on several alleged Marxist conspirators in1987. Human rights advocates were concerned that the current detainees would be dissuaded from seeking legal counsel and subjected to ill treatment during their period of incarceration (Tang 1989: 4-7; Frank et al. 1991: 5-99). Despite these protests, many Singaporeans expressed their strong support for the government's actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Folio No: DM.036 Folio Title: Correspondence (Official) With
    Folio No: DM.036 Folio Title: Correspondence (Official) with Chief Minister Content Description: Correspondence with Lim Yew Hock re: official matters, re-opening of Constitutional Talks and views of Australian interference in Merdeka process. Includes letter to GE Boggars on Chia Thye Poh and correspondence, as Chairman of Workers' Party, with Tunku Abdul Rahman re: merger of Singapore with Malaya. Also included is a typescript of discussion with Chou En-lai on Chinese citizenship and notes on Lee Kuan Yew's stand on several issues ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS Copy of notes on Lee Kuan Yew's views and statements on nationalisation, citizenship, elections, democracy, DM.036.001 Undated Digitized Open education and multi-lingualism [extracted from Legislative Assembly records] from 1955 - 1959 Letter to the Chief Minister re: Radio Malaya broadcast DM.036.002 13/6/1956 Digitized Open of [horse] race results Request to the Chief Minister to follow up on pensions DM.036.003 18/6/1956 Digitized Open under the civil liabilities scheme DM.036.004 20/6/1956 Reply from Lim Yew Hock re: action taken re: DM.36.3 Digitized Open Letter to the Chief Minister re: view of interference DM.036.005 20/6/1956 from Australian government in independence Digitized Open movement, offering solution DM.036.006 25/6/1956 From Chief Minister re: S Araneta's identity Digitized Open Letter to Chief Minister's Office enclosing from The Old DM.036.007 2/11/1956 Digitized Open Fire Engine Shop, USA Letter to Gerald de Cruz,
    [Show full text]
  • The North Kalimantan Communist Party and the People's Republic Of
    The Developing Economies, XLIII-4 (December 2005): 489–513 THE NORTH KALIMANTAN COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FUJIO HARA First version received January 2005; final version accepted July 2005 In this article, the author offers a detailed analysis of the history of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP), a political organization whose foundation date itself has been thus far ambiguous, relying mainly on the party’s own documents. The relation- ships between the Brunei Uprising and the armed struggle in Sarawak are also referred to. Though the Brunei Uprising of 1962 waged by the Partai Rakyat Brunei (People’s Party of Brunei) was soon followed by armed struggle in Sarawak, their relations have so far not been adequately analyzed. The author also examines the decisive roles played by Wen Ming Chyuan, Chairman of the NKCP, and the People’s Republic of China, which supported the NKCP for the entire period following its inauguration. INTRODUCTION PRELIMINARY study of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP, here- after referred to as “the Party”), an illegal leftist political party based in A Sarawak, was published by this author in 2000 (Hara 2000). However, the study did not rely on the official documents of the Party itself, but instead relied mainly on information provided by third parties such as the Renmin ribao of China and the Zhen xian bao, the newspaper that was the weekly organ of the now defunct Barisan Sosialis of Singapore. Though these were closely connected with the NKCP, many problems still remained unresolved. In this study the author attempts to construct a more precise party history relying mainly on the party’s own information and docu- ments provided by former members during the author’s visit to Sibu in August 2001.1 –––––––––––––––––––––––––– This paper is an outcome of research funded by the Pache Research Subsidy I-A of Nanzan University for the academic year 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarian Constitutionalism
    Authoritarian Constitutionalism The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Mark V. Tushnet, Authoritarian Constitutionalism, 100 Cornell L. Rev. 391 (2015). Published Version http://cornelllawreview.org/files/2015/01/100CLR391.pdf Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17367412 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 1 Authoritarian Constitutionalism Mark Tushnet1 I. Introduction Within days of the Singapore parliamentary election in May 2011, Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong announced that they had decided to leave the nation’s Cabinet, where they had been serving as “Minister Mentor” and “Senior Minister,” positions created for them as former Prime Ministers.2 The reason was that the People’s Action Party (PAP), which Lee Kuan Yew had founded with others in the 1950s and which had governed the nation since its separation 1 William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. I thank William Alford, Rosalind Dixon, Vicki Jackson, Jack Lee, H.K.M. Ewing-Chow, Rahul Sagar, Li-Ann Thio, Arun Kumar Thiruvengadam, and Po Jen Yap for comments on a draft, and participants at workshops at the University of Georgia Law School, Cornell Law School, New York University Law School, and Rutgers-Camden Law School for their comments. Geoffrey Curfman, now Research Intern in the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Al-Amyn Sumar provided important research assistance at an earlier stage of the project, as did --- at later stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of the Question and Answer Session at a Public Forum Organised by the University of Singapore Students' Union on Mo
    1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION AT A PUBLIC FORUM ORGANISED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE STUDENTS’ UNION ON MONDAY THE 27TH AUGUST, 1962. QUESTION BY JOSEPH LYNUS: After careful scrutiny we have been convinced that the change from nationality to citizenship has just been a change in nomenclature. You, Mr. Lee, earlier maintained that there was no difference between the meaning of these terms. Since you now use the term “citizenship” as opposed to “nationality”, we see an inconsistency in your terms. Please explain yourself. Prime Minister: I am sorry that Mr. Lynus believes that I have been inconsistent. I have always maintained that the State Advocate-General of Singapore was absolutely right when he said there was in law no distinction between the concept of a common nationality or a common citizenship. However, apart from what the law was, we had to take into consideration the political propaganda on the ground. And I LKY/1962/LKY0827B.doc 2 say this, quite simply, my enemies took a dangerous line when they had insisted that citizenship was different from nationality and they wanted citizenship. Well, you remember Mr. Marshall, he is a man not unlearned in the law, he came before this very same gathering two months ago, and he said this: “We do not quarrel about proportional representation. “We do not quarrel about with their insistence that Singapore politicians should vote or stand for election in the Federation. So we say, ‘we accept it Tengku, but let us have a common citizenship and let us have a common constitutional disability that no Federation citizen can stand or vote in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Malavsiao an Inevitable Creation, 16 September 1963
    'Malavsiao An Inevitable Creation, 16 September 1963 Ooi Keat Gin School of Humanities Universiti Sains Malaysia The concept of 'Malaysia' was conceived as a strategy of the westem powers, n Britain, to ensure that its former colonial possessions, namely (British) Malaya and Bomeo (sarawak, Brunei, North Bomeo) did not switch or fall into the socialist/ camp. The genesis of the formation of the Federation of Malaysia which comprised Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, Sabah (formerly North Bomeor), and that realized on 16 September 1963 presented a bulwark to the advancement of the i the communist ideology in the Southeast Asia region. The post-war situation and conditi the then British colonial territories and protectorates of Malaya, Singapore, sarawak, and North Borneo witnessed the increasing influence and threat of communism penn the region. comparatively, however, Brunei and North Bomeo had scant Leftist impact. During the 1950s and early 1960s, the mandarins at whitehall, the Foreign office (Fo), colonial office (co) were particularly anxious and apprehensive that their possessions in Southeast Asia appeared to be susceptible and be swept by the Leftist then prevailing in the region. Symptoms of this Leftist wave could be seen in neiehbouri Indonesia (Partai Komunis Indonesia, PKI, Indonesia communist partv). the phi (Hukbalahap, Huk), and vietnam (Viet cong). within Malaya itself, there was the pro Emergency (1948-1960) with the formidable Malayan communist party (MCp), whereas singapore the Barisan sosialis (Socialist Front) was gaining strength and influence, and in Sarawak, the clandestine manoeuvres of the Sarawak communist organization ( through the sarawak united People's Party (suPP) were worrisome, developments that threatening and troublesome.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity
    An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies School of History and Politics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT v DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ix GLOSSARY xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introductory Background 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Aims and Objectives 5 1.4. Scope and Limitation 6 1.5. Literature Review 7 1.6. Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework 17 1.7. Research Methodology 25 1.8. Significance of Study 26 1.9. Thesis Organization 27 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 30 2.1. Introduction 30 2.2. The Historical Background of Malaysia 32 2.3. The Historical Background of Singapore 34 2.4. The Period of British Colonial Rule 38 i 2.4.1. Malayan Union 40 2.4.2. Federation of Malaya 43 2.4.3. Independence for Malaya 45 2.4.4. Autonomy for Singapore 48 2.5. Singapore’s Inclusion in the Malaysian Federation (1963-1965) 51 2.6. The Period after Singapore’s Separation from Malaysia 60 2.6.1. Tunku Abdul Rahman’s Era 63 2.6.2 Tun Abdul Razak’s Era 68 2.6.3. Tun Hussein Onn’s Era 76 2.7. Conclusion 81 3 CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 83 3.1. Introduction to the Issues Affecting Relations Between Malaysia and Singapore 83 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • DM.029 Folio Title: Labour Front Correspondence Content Description: Party Correspondence and Other Documents, List of Venues for the "Meet the People" Sessions
    Folio No: DM.029 Folio Title: Labour Front Correspondence Content Description: Party correspondence and other documents, list of venues for the "meet the People" sessions. Includes extract of a speech by the Chief Minister of Malaya on 20 Feb 1956 and invitation to the various party leaders to an All-Party Rally, arrangements at the airport to send David Marshall off, and anonymous letters. Correspondents include: Keng Ban Ee Er, Richard C.H. Lim, Lim Yew Hock, and S.H. Moffat ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS Memo from Keng Ban Ee enclosing List of venues for DM.29.001 2/2/1955 Digitized Open "Meet the People Sessions" Letter from Rabbi Harold H Gordon re: meeting up in DM.29.002 12/1/1956 Digitized Open New York Letter from Omar bin Salleh announcing appointment of DM.29.003 16/2/1956 S Devaraj, G Abishigenaden and Madam E Vaithinatha as Digitized Open Organisers of Cairnhill Division Letter from SH Moratt of the Labour Party of Israel, re: DM.29.004 1/2/1956 Digitized Open developments in Israel Letter from S Ramachandra, with views on immigrant and DM.29.005 6/2/1956 other issues, enclosing news clipping from Singapore Digitized Open Standard dated 2 Feb 1955 DM.29.006 9/2/1956 Anonymous letter chiding about "bad language" Digitized Open Letter from EH Koh offering service for the proposed DM.29.007 16/1/1956 Digitized Open Ministry of Labour and Industry DM.29.008 20/2/1956 Follow up letter to DM.29.7 Digitized Open Extract of speech by the Chief Minister of the Federation DM.29.009 21/2/1956
    [Show full text]
  • Class and Politics in Malaysian and Singaporean Nation Building
    CLASS AND POLITICS IN MALAYSIAN AND SINGAPOREAN NATION BUILDING Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor, M.A. Political Science College of Business, Government and Law Flinders University Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 Page Left Deliberately Blank. Abstract This study endeavours to deliver an alternative account of the study of nation-building by examining the subject matter eclectically from diverse standpoints, predominantly that of class in Southeast Asia which is profoundly dominated by ‘cultural’ perspectives. Two states in the region, Malaysia and Singapore, have been selected to comprehend and appreciate the nature of nation-building in these territories. The nation-building processes in both of the countries have not only revolved around the national question pertaining to the dynamic relations between the states and the cultural contents of the racial or ethnic communities in Malaysia and Singapore; it is also surrounded, as this thesis contends, by the question of class - particularly the relations between the new capitalist states’ elites (the rulers) and their masses (the ruled). More distinctively this thesis perceives nation-building as a project by political elites for a variety of purposes, including elite entrenchment, class (re)production and regime perpetuation. The project has more to do with ‘class-(re)building’ and ‘subject- building’ rather than ‘nation-building’. Although this thesis does not eliminate the significance of culture in the nation-building process in both countries; it is explicated that cultures were and are heavily employed to suit the ruling class’s purpose. Hence, the cultural dimension shall be used eclectically with other perspectives.
    [Show full text]