No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
TABLE OF CONTENT
FROM THE EDITOR ...... 2 ABOUT SCAAE ...... 3 4 ...... ڂሳՖːדⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ2012౺ↈ⇾ ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳҚ⇾ⅶሳᔕଢሳُʶ ...... 6⇾ ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ⇾⣫Ӡሳᔕଢሳُʶ ...... 7⇾ ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ⣫ռӠሳᔕଢሳُʶ ...... 8⇾ THE DAYS WE WERE – A LOOK BACK ON 2011...... 9 SCAAE NORTHWEST 2011 HIGHLIGHTS AND 2012 OUTLOOK ...... 13 2011 SCAAE LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD WINNER ...... 18 2011 FRIEND OF SCAAE AWARD WINNER...... 19 THE FIFTH GLOBAL CHINESE AERONAUTICAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE20 ARCHITECTURE ISSUES IN COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT INFORMATION SYSTEM...... 22 INTRODUCTION OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE METHOD...... 27 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE MISHAP ANALYSIS ...... 31 FUTURE, CHALLENGE, AND OPPORTUNITY – CHINESE AEROSPACE AMBITION ...... 35 SCAAEҚ⇾䋚ሳሳὁ ...... 40 ᮭ⦼⠧...... 41ڂSCAAE ሳ 42 ...... ڂSCAAE ⇾ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ ᖝʝሳ ⳇ⤻⻞...... 43ڂSCAAE ሳ
~ Հ⬀بೊ ~
⡹ᛎᮞᧃ֢ⷪं ...... ૺㄇ ⡹ᅘὌẤ᠇డᏈߤ֒...... ૺಎ VICTORIA FINANCIAL & SAN GABRIEL DANCE STUDIO...... ૺಎ
~ 1 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
From the Editor -Tony Pan- I would like to take the opportunity to thank and congratulate all SCAAE members for all your personal and professional accomplishments in the past year and your great contribution and participation in our very own SCAAE organization. To make this journal possible, we have many members who donated their personal times to help in many different ways, many thanks to those individuals. We sincerely thank those who placed commercial advertisement in our journal. Thanks are also extended to many of our friends and family members for your continuous support. In this 2012 edition of journal, we would present you our variety activities happened in the past year, share with you our ideas, thoughts, joys and knowledge that reflect our dedication to the organization and professional life. With your participation, SCAAE tradition and spirit cultivated from date one by Chinese American Engineers will continue. All views and opinions presented in this journal are represented by each individual contributor and do not refl ect the position of SCAAE. Finally I wish you enjoy this 2012 journal and another wonderful and flourish year ahead.
www.scaae.org ~ 2 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
About SCAAE
The Society of Chinese American Aerospace Engineers (SCAAE) is a professional organization. It was established in 1989 at Pasadena, California. After years of growth, it now has more than 300 members. SCAAE consists of three local chapters and a national chapter, i.e., the West Chapter in Los Angeles, the Northwest Chapter in Seattle, and the South Chapter in Dallas. The three local chapters then form the National Chapter to represent the entire organization to the outside world. The purpose of SCAAE is to support members' professional growth and career development, promoting cooperation among aerospace industries in USA, China and Taiwan. We also want to increase Chinese American Aerospace Engineers' infl uence and maintain members' benefi ts in the aerospace industry.
~ 3 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
SCAAE 2012 ORGANIZATION CHART ڂሳՖːדⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ 2012 ౺ↈ⇾
Қ⇾䋚 ሳ (SCAAE-National Chapter)
ሳ (President)Řቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Lee), ʶ (Chairman) : ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar)
,(҇ (Key Donn), ⪮Ֆ (Treasurer): ᗕᅞᎾ (Fred ShenڥẨሬ (Secretary)Ř
ʶ (Board Directors)Ř
,(҇ (Key Donn), ቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Lee), ቦલ (Shawn Li), ኚஉ(Frank Linڥ
ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu), ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar), ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung),
ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun), ⠺Ύ㓠(Pao-lin Yuan), ሯୀ (Shanying Zeng),
⇾⣫Ӡሳ (SCAAE-West Chapter)
ሳ (President): ⶎञ҆ (Daguang Zheng), ʶ (Chairman): ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun)
Ԟሳ (Vice President): ᪗उ(George Wong), ៊҆(Tony Pan)
⪮Ֆ (Treasurer): ⋟Ⰺ(Jun Hu)
ʶ (Board Directors)Ř
づᛘ(Bill Chen), づ⣫ሬ(His-Shu Chen), ᙈ(Yuan Hong), ⋟Ⰺ(Jun Hu),
ኚᣅ(David Lin), ኚஉ(Frank Lin), ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar), ઔԻ∌(Liqun Meng),
ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung), ៊҆(Tony Pan), ᗕᅞᎾ (Fred Shen), ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun),
ᜭଅ(Philip Tang), ử(Ying Teng), ぬⳬⓧ(Eric Yang), ⠺Ύ㓠(Pao-lin Yuan),
᪗उ(George Wong), ⶎञ҆ (Daguang Zheng)
www.scaae.org ~ 4 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
⣫ռӠሳ (SCAAE-Northwest Chapter)
ሳ (President): ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu), ʶ (Chairman): ሯୀ (Shanying Zeng)
Ԟሳ (Vice President): ঔ (Helen Jiang)
⪮Ֆ (Treasurer): ቦલ (Shanw Li)
ʶ (Board Directors)Ř
(҇ (key Donn), ঔ (Helen Jiang), ቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Leeڥ ,(∣ (Jason Dai ቦલ (Shawn Li), ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu), Մ∌ (Shao-Chun Liu), ⅿൠᕊ (Ed Miao), ᧅನᖁ (Kangmin Niu), ഘʠ҆ (Jack Peng), ᮪ᤇ (CC Tien), ሯୀ(Shanying Zeng)
(Ӡሳ (SCAAE-South֡⇾
ሳ (President): ᪗ᘘ౹, ʶ (Chairman): ക
:(Advisors)ۊㆰ
ቦҚ̕, ᮪ᤇ, Ꭻચࠀ, ᄎ౹, ቦ㕻, ᧅᆨժ, づᣊϒ, ᪗ⳬࡣ, ኚᛤ␖
㉐ռˊ˩⠧: ㋧∌ᦎ ռ˩⠧: ໝӕש㉐
~ 5 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
SCAAE NATIONAL CHAPTER HONOR ROLL ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳҚ⇾ⅶሳᔕଢሳُʶ⇾
Year President ņሳŇ Chairman ņʶŇ 2012 ቦᛩ(Shiang-Yu Lee) ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar) 2011 ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar) ቦᛩ(Shiang-Yu Lee) (㐴(Louis Huangۓ∣(Jason DaiŇ 㓳 2010 2009 ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ∣(Jason DaiŇ 㐴(Louis Huang) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇۓ㓳 2008 㐴(Louis Huang) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇۓ㓳 2007 2006 ቦҚ̕(Charles Lee) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ 2005 ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ ቦҚ̕(Charles Lee) 2004 ቦҚ̕(Charles Lee) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ 2003 ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung) 2002 ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung) 2001 ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ 2000 ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung) ᮪ᤇ(CC TienŇ
www.scaae.org ~ 6 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
SCAAE WEST CHAPTER HONOR ROLL ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ⇾⣫Ӡሳᔕଢሳُʶ⇾
Year President ņሳŇ Chairman ņʶŇ 2012 ⶎञ҆ (Daguang Zheng) ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun) 2011 ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun) ⠺Ύ㓠(Pao-lin Yuan) 2010 ⠺Ύ㓠(Pao-lin Yuan) ኚஉ(Frank Lin) 2009 ⠺Ύ㓠(Pao-lin Yuan) ኚஉ(Frank Lin) 2008 ኚஉ(Frank Lin) づ⣫ሬ(His-Shu Chen) 2007 づ⣫ሬ(His-Shu Chen) ̶я(Tony Torng) 2006 ̶я(Tony Torng) (づἼോ)(Victor Chen) 2005 (づἼോ)(Victor Chen) ử(Ying Teng) 2004 ử(Ying Teng) づ ᛘ(Bill Chen) 2003 づ ᛘ(Bill Chen) ぬⳬⓧ(Eric Yang) 2002 ぬⳬⓧ(Eric Yang) ⫯ᄎ(John Lai) 2001 ⫯ᄎ(John Lai) ᗕᅞᎾ (Fred Shen) (㐴(Louis HuangۓᗕᅞᎾ (Fred Shen) 㓳 2000 (㐴(Louis Huangۓ⬰ẛⰊ)(Richard Chao) 㓳) 1999 (㐴(Louis Huang) ⥓ൠӓ(Jeffrey Shuۓ㓳 1998 1997 㓳Ჩɿ(Yatsum Huang) ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar) 1996 ⥓ൠӓ(Jeffrey Shu) ቦ㕻(Tom Lee) 1995 ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar) ቦҚ̕(Charles Lee) 1994 ቦ㕻(Tom Lee) ᄎ౹(Stephen Liu) 1993 ቦҚ̕(Charles Lee) Ꭻચࠀ(Michael Yang) 1992 Ꭻચࠀ(Michael Yang) ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung), 1991 ᄎ౹(Stephen Liu) ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung), 1990,1989 ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung)
~ 7 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
SCAAE NORTHWEST CHAPTER HONOR ROLL ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ⣫ռӠሳᔕଢሳُʶ⇾
Year President ņሳŇ Chairman ņʶŇ 2012 Jack Jianxia Liu (ዚऑ) Shanying Zeng ņሯୀŇ 2011 Shanying Zeng ņሯୀŇ Shawn Li ņቦલŇ ҇ŇڥShawn Li ņቦલŇ Key Donnņ 2010 2009 Shawn Li ņቦલŇ Ed Miao ņⅿൠᕊŇ 2008 Ed Miao ņⅿൠᕊŇ Jason Dai ņ∣Ň 2007 Jason Dai ņ∣Ň Oliver Hsu ņറɺોŇ ҇ŇڥOliver Hsu ņറɺોŇ Key Donn ņ 2006 ҇Ň Jason Dai ņ∣ŇڥKey Donn ņ 2005 ҇Ň Jason Dai ņ∣ŇڥKey Donn ņ 2004 ҇Ň Jason Dai ņ∣ŇڥKey Donn ņ 2003 2002 Jason Dai ņ∣Ň Kuen Y. Lin ņኚࠍŇ 2001 Kuen Y. Lin ņኚࠍŇ CC Tienņ᮪ᤇŇ 2000 Kuen Y. Lin ņኚࠍŇ CC Tienņ᮪ᤇŇ 1999 CC Tienņ᮪ᤇŇ 1998 CC Tienņ᮪ᤇŇ 1997 CC Tienņ᮪ᤇŇ
www.scaae.org ~ 8 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
The Days We Were – A Look Back on 2011 Chuck Sun ચನ, President of SCAAE, 2011
First of all, I would like to say a big “Thank you” to all SCAAE board members who have been very supportive to make 2011 a memorable year. Our memberships have grown by more than 30 new members and we had established emails data base for our members. Moreover, we have updated many records within our memberships. In addition to all these, we have elected 3 new board directors who are actively and ethusiatively helping our SCAAE family at the moment. There are many SCAAE activities taking places within the year of 2011, and I like to provide some highlights for each of these events.
Ȣ SCAAE Annual Convention - 3/5/2011
We had more than 180 members and guests attended our convention at night, and 40 plus attendees for technical seminar at daytime. The whole event was very successful as a result of great team effort; it was both very informative and entertaining. Some pictures for the event are shown below:
~ 9 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
Ȣ Computer Workshop - 6/4/2011 We had a very enlightening learning workshop on “how to build a website” and “Chinese typing” . Within a few hours, all attendees progressed from not knowing to novices who are able to perform the basic tasks. Thanks to our instructor “George Wong” who was diligently sharing his knowledge and expertise. There were 10 plus lucky attendees for this workshop. Some pictures for the event are shown below:
Ȣ Fall Picnics - 10/29/2011 We had more than 30 members and guests attended this fun event. The weather was so gorgeous for this outdoor activity. Fantastically, it is a complimentary event and all food and drinks are fully provided by SCAAE. We had BBQ beef, chicken, tons of veggie, fruits, fried noodles, etc… The smell of these foods was so inviting; everyone had to open up their belts and ended up with full bellies …. All participants really enjoyed chatting with each others, laughing together, eating and drinking in a beautiful day. Too bad no beer was allowed … Well; if you missed this good one, just remember to attend similar events in the future. You will not regret! Some pictures for the picnics are shown below: www.scaae.org ~ 10 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Ȣ Hiking and Board Meeting - 12/27/2011 It is a swell idea to combine fun hiking and serious meeting together. This way, our spouses can join in and get to know each others. I will call it an event to foster more bonds within each others. In the morning, we did some good hiking in Schabarum Park. Following that, everyone got together in the restaurant and enjoyed a lunch together. Afterward, we had a successful board meeting. The new 2012 Chairman, President and Vice Presidents were born in this meeting. Some pictures are shown below:
~ 11 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
While looking back to 2011, I have to say I am grateful to be given this opportunity to serve as President for SCAAE. Again, I sincerely like to thank all the board directors for their dedications. With all of us together, we have made this 2011 a memorable year for SCAAE.
To all SCAAE members and friends, please remember SCAAE belongs to you; all the board members are here to SERVE you. Thank you and wish everyone and SCAAE a great 2012 and beyond.
SCAAE Thank You for Your Support!
www.scaae.org ~ 12 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
SCAAE NORTHWEST 2011 HIGHLIGHTS AND 2012 OUTLOOK Jack J Liu (ዚऑ) Ph.D., 2012 SCAAE NW President
In 2011, with the growth of aerospace industry, especially record breaking demand for fuel efficient commercial airplanes, many Chinese-American engineers came to greater Seattle and became aerospace engineers. SCAAE NW organized several activities for members and newcomers to advance their professional and personal knowledge and skills in aerospace engineering.
On April 16, 2011, SCAAE NW held the Spring Dinner Gathering at Top Gun Seafood Restaurant, Bellevue. A guest speaker from the Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CSAA) gave a brief introduction to Chinese Commercial Aircraft Industry and the C-919 commercial aircraft design. This event was partially sponsored by Vanceinfo. Over 50 people participated in this event including guests and six new members.
On June 4, 2011, SCAAE NW held June Technical Seminar at Lake Hills Library Meeting Room, Bellevue. Helen Jiang gave a presentation of China Market Outlook and Carrie Shiu gave a presentation of Safety Heritage in Interior Design.
On July 16, 2011, SCAAE NW participated in the joint summer picnic event with several Seattle Chinese-American associations at Newcastle Beach Park, Bellevue. About 20 adults and 15 kids from SCAAE NW chapter attended this event.
On August 8, 2011, five SCAAE NW members attended the 5th Global Chinese Aeronautical Technology Conference held at Shanghai, China. Boeing was one of this conference sponsors. SCAAE NW member and 2011 president: Shanying Zeng put effort in Boeing becoming sponsorship of this conference.
On September 11, 2011, SCAAE NW held U-2 Black Cat Squadron seminar at Council Chamber in Bellevue City Hall, Bellevue. The guest speaker was Mr. Li Zhen Wang, senior engineer of Lockheed Martin. The activity was reported on the World Journal - Seattle Edition, September 7, 2011. SCAAE NW member and SCAAE Board Director: Key Donn and Bellevue Vice Mayor: Conrad Lee put in a lot of efforts to make this event happen.
Year 2012 is a very prosper year for aerospace industry, especially for commercial airplane manufacturers and suppliers, but it is also a very challenging year for aerospace companies to fulfill the commitment to deliver products to the customers on time. Chinese-American aerospace engineers will play a key role in helping their companies to achieve these business goals. To help members’ personal and professional development and networking, SCAAE NW is planning to achieve the following objectives in 2012.
~ 13 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
1. Become a recognized association
x Have SCAAE NW Incorporated in Washington State
x Issue membership card to members and certificates to officers and board members
x Post SCAAE Banners in every event
x Create SCAAE NW web pages
2. Host SCAAE NW first Annual Convention and Recognition Banquet
x Introduce SCAAE and NW Organizations, membership benefits and obligations
x 2012 SCAAE NW officers installation
x Present SCAAE NW 2012 plan
x Issue awards
3. Grow memberships by 50% in 2012
x Promote life-membership
x Recruit new members and restore previous members’ memberships
x Set up membership recruitment awards
4. Organize a technical conference committee for preparation of co-hosting the 1st Applied Aerospace Technology Conference
x Accepted papers will be published in a technical journal
x All papers will be published on SCAAE Journal
5. Start organizing local chapters for each state in the northwest region
These are very challenging goals for 2012 or beyond, but I am very confident that we can achieve these objectives because of our team, our commitment, our motivation and our dedication, most importantly, our willingness to serve our members. I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere appreciation to you for being SCAAE members and serving as our board members.
www.scaae.org ~ 14 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Photos for SCAAE Northwest 2011 Highlights and 2012 Outlook and for SCAAE Annual Convention
⥱ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ⣫ռӠሳሳዚऑ߱ 2012 ౺౺ሳʀṗ⇾ SCAAE NW President: Jack Jianxia Liu at 2012 SCAAE Annual Convention Speech
Photos for SCAAE Northwest 2011 Highlights and 2012 Outlook and for SCAAE Annual Convention
ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ⣫ռӠሳʶഛ ņ2012 ౺ሳŇSCAAE Northwest⇾ ఢ⬚ (From Left): ቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Lee), ሯୀ (Shanying Zeng), ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu)
~ 15 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
Photos for SCAAE Northwest 2011 Highlights and 2012 Outlook and for SCAAE Annual Convention
ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳҚ⇾ⅶሳʶഛ ņ2012 ౺౺ሳŇSCAAE National Board⇾ Directors ఢ⬚ (From Left): ኚஉ (Frank Lin), ሯୀ (Shanying Zeng), ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu), ቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Lee), ㈸߱⒜(Nelson Mar), ᓿぬଅ౹(Philip Oyoung), ⠺Ύ㓠 (Pao-Lin Yuan), ચ݄ನ (Chuck Sun)
Photos for SCAAE Northwest 2011 Highlights and 2012 Outlook and for SCAAE Annual Convention
,(ણṞ (Sidney Luآ ,(ఢ⬚ (From Left): ቦᛩ (Shiang-Yu Lee), ዚऑ (Jack Jianxia Liu (ણṞडː (Mrs. Lu)Ŋ⠺Ύ㓠डː (Mrs. Yuan)Ŋ⠺Ύ㓠 (Pao-Lin Yuanآ www.scaae.org ~ 16 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
بㅹᱹ2011౺Ᏻ⩇ᩦࢊ ᓿぬଅ౹֢ं
ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ⎊1988౺ໞἼ⎏˚ሷ23౺᱿ᔕ⇾ ऄໞӷႴሷᄲ⑊ڂʴŊໟΩ߱Ⳇᕀᔓሶ⡹Ŋഺʪ̤ԡሳሳ ɿ߸⎵ठడᏈ᮹שӷ⇾ȮʑȮט᱿Қߡඖ૾ᏈↈŊڂᱻሳ क᮹דڂŊҢໞԼʃᆯϵᤋ᱿ŊⳆᆯ⳧⥓घᥖൔ᱿ሳר⦔᱿ ≟ːᆹ⿵᱿ञԻᄄྃ≟Ử⊌᱿ໞኞȯʶሳ໊┮ස᱿ൔה ⪰ᅠ2010౺ᗉ⩀˚രᕓ౺ㅹᱹқㅮᏳ⩇ᩦ⃛⳧ଃሳሷతञ ⳭໟΩ᱿⨀Ŋଃሳሳ⠧ד᪇᱿ːंŊ˫⠧ച˟Ω᱿ՁԻ ŊໟΩᕓ౺ⴆɺ̤⫏ᛖːंㅹᱹ˟“⎵ठ֠ሳ⯿ໞଔᩦڂ (SCAAE Lifetime Achievement Award)”Ŋവᩦːトሯ߱ሳ Ӡሳ᱿ʶȯ׳˶ሺՖघ౺Ŋʈ
ΩŊᕓ౺ԅㅹ⫾“⎵ठהଃक᮹ሯञԻᄄྃՀໟΩ᱿ሹ ⎠ᩦ (Friend of SCAAE Award)”⳧ʶΩ๚⸅᱿הሳʠ֠ ⒄⎞⤽⧄ȯ
ԊሳŊ≟⎵ठʠדὮʷଢ⯿ໞଔᩦവʙᣅ᮪ᤇᄞ࿙ ᩦ᱿വʙᣅⶎяॉंŊʶሳ߱2011౺౺ሳʑㅹᩦ⃛˟Ωה қ̤Ŋ⃛ᯍᇄ౺ሳ࣑⏨ʃଇŊ̈́⥫ॖៜŊ᧚૽˟Ωʷ̤ ˛ ॖʁ:
~ 17 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
SCAAE LIFETIME ACHIVEMENT AWARD ठ֠ሳ⯿ໞଔᩦ⎵
വᩦːŘ᮪ᤇ ᄞ࿙ Chang Chio Tien
᮪ᤇᄞ࿙ ˛
www.scaae.org ~ 18 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
FRIEND OF SCAAE AWARD ᩦהठ֠ሳʠ⎵
വᩦː: ⶎя (Teresa Hsu) ॉं
ⶎя ॉं ˛
ᢕʊᅘञשⶎяॉंᯃᏈᅠ ણ, ॎԽҘʑߡೊႩҝໞᣅῃᲿ ʙྃːघ౺ȯẼᖁ͗⇾ര, ሯ߱ᄲ ೊႩヅ⣶̪ҝჂ˶㋧べ⠗ᄎʙ ᾷ, ʏ̲߱҆ୀϝ∑డჂ˶̲҆ࢊʙ ℶȯ ⶎя߱ᘾቢḌⓧːḽ֒ᮚᣅ ᙙ⯧, ሯ߱घΤḽߨჂ˶ㅽ⊚Ֆ, ͛ॖॎሯჂ˶̕ρԮࠂḽ, ֡Խజ ,ሳʶהʑߡञ૾ずዮ⊓ሳዮ ㈸ʪⅶ⃥⳧ࣀᘾቢḌЮૈⅶᾋᯉ я, ╗ఱキ֓ߡ֗ᅲߤⳤሳⅶ⎞ ሳڂᾋᯉ,..,ᾀ, ॎ˶⠗ᄎずЮՖএ ȯۊЮՖㆰ
˫⎊⎵ठ֠ሳໞἼ˫͗, ॎɺ ,הⶎя߱⎵ठ֠ሳሷ⥓घ॑ ठ֠ሳⴎ⦼ॎ⎵⣬ף ,ㅮᙙՒȯ ߱⳧घ౺ҙ׳ञԻᄄྃሳ᱿ Հせϝя, ॎⵣᓞᤋᾊະ, ᄍʁ⯿ᕀᣅሳሺՖȯ ॎሯჂ˶घᓝ౺ Ớࢍʑ׳ሳُҢ⸅⣬ゝሳ᱿я, ᣅሳᦩ҆ʃଇȯ ॎ߱ሳ ˫㋧ᖛ᱿⠧ञञ߸ဏ֗ʴሳ᱿ഐЭ, ᣅሳ֢വ⥓घ॑⥫, ᩦ⃛ॎ˫⠧ⳭໟΩଃॎ⳧घהʶሳᗉ⩀ㅹ⫾ 2011౺⎵ठ֠ሳʠ ౺˫͗ଃሳ⪯᪇᱿⨀ȯ
~ 19 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
The Fifth Global Chinese Aeronautical Technology Conference
By Shanying Zeng
The Fifth Global Chinese Aeronautical Technology Conference was held from August 8th to 10th, 2011 at Grand Skylight Gardens Hotel, Shanghai, China. This is the conference that SCAAE has been in collobration with Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CSAA) and the association in Taiwant to host every two year with the last two held in Taiwan and in Xian, China. The purpose of the conference is to create opportunities for interaction and network between the Chinese aerospace engineers in US, China and Taiwan. For each conference, SCAAE has always had delegation with members from different part in US to participate, either as presenter or conference participants.
There are about 100 participants in the conference. Beside SCAAE members from US, there are a few people from Taiwan. Most of the Chinese participants are from Shanghai area. The followings are details about the conference agenda:
Aug.8th 14:00-21:00 Registration Lobby of Grand Skylight Gardens Hotel Evening Welcome Reception sponsored by Boeing www.scaae.org ~ 20 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Aug. 9th AM Plenary Lectures PM Paper Presentations Grand Skylight Gardens Hotel Evening Banquet hosted by CSAA
Aug. 10th AM Paper Presentations PM Technical Visit Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd. City Tour Pujiang River and Jin Mao Tower
An optional three-day tour was organized after the conference from August 11th to 13th to visit Putuo Mountain, Xikou and the water town Wuzhen in Zhejiang province. Some of the SCAAE members also participated in it and really enjoyed the travel/visits.
For this conference, SCAAE has been working with CSAA since 2010 on many details, ranging from conference timing, sponsorship, focus, speaker/participants, etc. Some of the highlights are
- SCAAE convinced Boeing to provide sponsorship both from funding as well as speakers and participants. $10K was provided by Boeing to sponsor the conference. Keynote from Boeing and eight people from Boeing participated in the conference with two of them giving presentations at the conference
- CSAA very appreciated the participation from SCAAE and agreed to waive the registration fee for all the SCAAE participants. For people who were attending conference on their own, CSAA also provided the room during conference time for free
- With the theme for this conference to be on Green Aerospace, SCAAE was able to secure the presentation by Al Bryant, VP of Boeing Research and Technology China on Boeing’s commitment to environment
- SCAAE NW had five people participated in the conference and SCAAE SW had two people participate in the conference. Two presentations from Shiang-yu Lee and Shanying Zeng were given at the conference
- SCAAE NW, SCAAE SW had a pre conference meeting with the key people at CSAA and people from Taiwan, and had good discussion and conversation on future interation as well as the next conference. It was tentative agreed that the next meeting should be held in Beijing
The overall feedback from the participants have been very positive. All felt this type of conference and interaction are very helpful and beneficial.
~ 21 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
Ѩሞܼ⧗ढҎ㟾ぎ⾥ᡔⷨ䅼Ӯ
Architecture Issues in Commercial Aircraft Life Cycle Support Information Systems Shiang-Yu Lee, Ph. D.1,2* 1 Chief Aerodynamicist, WIPO Wind Power LTD, Wuxi, 214122, China 2Prtincipal Engineer-Information Architect (Retired)
Abstract This paper focuses on the architecture issues of information systems supporting the commercial aircraft after it’s delivery to the customer. The important issues are how the information are produced, delivered, stored and utilized. Since the evolution of digital documentation and internet communications, various standardization efforts have been committed to provide an ideal framework for aircraft manufacturers and airline communities. Often these standards are heavily influenced by the technology in vogue at the time and the results are far from being all encompassing. An attempt is made here to point out some short comings of existing standards and suggest more contemporary alternatives.
Keywords: commercial aircraft, support, maintenance, documentation, information system, standard, logical conditions, reference data, master data, information integration
1. Introduction1 support deductive determination of maintenance procedures. Traditional aircraft support information are developed in the form of maintenance documents 2. The Effectivity Concept and other communications. For a long time, these were paper documents and early standardization The concept of “effectivity’ has been in use for all efforts were focused on the appearance formats and these years in the aircraft support community. The idea indexing schemes. The ATA 100 standards were the is an extended use of “drawing effectivity” in classical example. By following disciplined engineering designs. practices, the air transport industry has proven to be In the old paper drawing design environment, an extremely safe and efficient business community. “effectivity tabbing” have been used to indicate the When computer applications became more viable, applicability of a drawing and its related parts to a many of these documents have evolved to be specific airplane. It is simply a listing of airplane developed with computers and later also delivered in a identification ranges or, in extreme cases, tail numbers portable medium. The use of note book computers and that the drawing applies to. The drawing sheet is CD ROM storage have enabled technicians to find and usually marked by a drawing “dash number” utilize maintenance information on board an aircraft at indicating a variation to the original “base line” design. gate. Electronic formatting standards and searching Consequently, the parts listed in the drawing also capabilities, such as the IETM (Interactive Electronic adopt the dash number to indicate newer versions. This Technical Manual) specifications, have helped the practice is, of course, very labor intensive and error accuracy and productivity in these endeavors prone, but the practice has been in use all the way into tremendously. the 21 century in some companies. And throughout the However the practices in the current industry has its years of computer supporting software development, roots in documentation and many aspects are not ideal these legacy concepts have forced the computing for the modern digital world. We would like to discuss programs to adopt the illogical practices. It has cost the several aspects that more sensible methods can industry a great deal of efforts and pain to change the modernize the practices. The aspects discussed include practice to a modern “configuration management” the storage mechanism, the logical deduction of practice suitable for digital information management. maintenance requirements and the way of expressing For the airplane support activities, the concept of and storing dynamic aircraft status information to effectivity has the similar meaning but applies to support documentations, such as maintenance manuals, for the usage of the instruction material in specific situations. In simple cases, an effectivity marking can * [email protected] simply be “MD80”, indicating the item’s usability to www.scaae.org ~ 22 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
all MD-80 family of airplanes. But it can also be more complicated, such as “MD87, Salty Air, 20,000 Applicability Process (Pseudo Code): Flights”, for the “-87 sub-model, operating in a salty } applicbility (technical_data_logical_unit, environment and after 20,000 flights.” physical_product_instance): The issues with the traditional practice, as discussed LOCAL applicability: BOOLEAN in the 90’s, were that the concepts, the formats as well effectivity: BOOLEAN as exact meaning of everything that was presented in an effectivity had not been clearly defined. All the IF creation and usage interpretations of the documents were done by the gut feelings and intuitions of the effectivity_clause (physical_product_instance) = TRUE ; people involved. Very often, the document entries were THEN ambiguous and could cause the wrong procedures being performed in maintenance actions. In fact, to this applicability = TRUE; date, one can hardly find a proper definition of the word “Effectivity” that pertains to what has been ELSE practiced in the aviation industry community. NEXT technical_data_logical_unit;
END IF; {
Listing 1 Applicability Process
In terms of functionality, the effectivity phrase content needs to support at least the following areas: • Product and instance identifications • Configuration Definition • Functional, system, and real instance object Fig.1 Effectivity Concept identification In 1997, this author participated in an Air Transport • Operational conditions and experiences Association (ATA) meeting where the issues were • Special event encounter discussed and offered the following illustration of the Effectivity concept. Basically, it explains that the These functional requirements can be satisfied by usage of effectivity, in fact should be discussed in the the normal form declarative illustration offered also by context of the “Applicability Process”, where the this author at the time as indicated in Listing 2. This effectivity is applied as a filter to determine the prompted the ATA discussions and eventual adoption applicability of the technical information to a specific of a SGML encapsulation, in Spec2100, exemplified airplane under consideration by Listing 3. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the effectivity could include As can be seen in Listing 3, the functional a combination of several parameters that specify the requirements are indeed implemented by the condition of the airplane under which the subject “Effectivity Block” as well as supporting the “OR” material is relevant. This applicability process is expression. This is because the “AND” operator is further specified in a pseudo code in Listing 1, even implicitly implied when there is no “OR” present. though the processes are, up to now, primarily It must be emphasized that having such an executed by human beings. implementation doesn’t mean an ideal state has been achieved. As a matter of fact, there are plenty of When the effectivity is a combination of multiple shortcomings. For example, implementing the coding parameters, they in fact form a “logical phrase”. If all “SB” and “PRE” within the SGML Element the parameters must be satisfied, they are in an “AND” “Attribute” is not an ideal method because, in so doing, combination and if satisfying any one of them is they are fixed in the specification. Any time a new sufficient, it is an “OR” construct. An effectivity could requirement arises, the definition specification need to involve several AND - OR combinations. be entirely modified. Also, there is no specification of legal entries for the data themselves, leaving open arbitrary and inconsistent entries. ~ 23 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
adequately support a formal definition and lend itself to both human and machine interpretation and effectivity_clause = execution. (product_identification, OPTIONAL REPEAT ('AND' _ 'OR' ), compound_criteria )
operational_condition = ( ETOPS _ ICE _ RAIN _ SANDY _FRSTATE _ PAXSTATE _ COMBISTATE _ ENGFERRY _ HEAVLAND _ CATII _ CATIII _ COLDWEATH _ FLP _ AEP _ OVERSPEED _ VULCASH _ REJTAKEOFF _ WINDSHEAR _ WAKEVORTEX _ FAA _ TAILSCRAP _ RAPIDDECOM _ CORROSION _ HARDLAND _ VISUALINSPECT _ DYEPENETRANT _ EDDYCURRENT _ XRAY _ ....… )
The logical determination of alternatives is a common practice in computer programming. It is also commonly applied to electronic circuitry designs. However, if the concept is to be defined outside of a computer program, it becomes extremely difficult Fig.2 “Condition Evaluation” Data Model since there is no language foundation that can www.scaae.org ~ 24 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ ypy The final ISO specification did include the simple data must be organized in storage. On the other hand, definitions of “Condition”, “Condition Criterion”, the flat table storage is supported by elegant relational “Condition Parameter”, “Condition Validation”, etc. database languages that can re-organize the data and to provide a basic capability to capture necessary represent them in any form wanted. It is feasible data values for a conditional applicability of the therefore to represent the same data in several different technical data. hierarchies. The issue with the STEP family of standards is One more advantage of using relational technology that it is too complicated and also demands a neutral is the implementation of data links. SGML/XML links data format in terms of “Module Interpreted are no different then the internet HTML links. Since Module” (MIM). While the need of neutral data is they are hard coded, it is very difficult to maintain link undeniable, the STEP MIM does not contain integrity when changes in data or filing occur. With a sufficient details to guarantee unique representation relational database in the back end, the links can be of all the Application Reference Model semantics. generated in real time and natural link consistency can be easily maintained. To this date, only very limited STEP In the early days of relational database practices implementation are available for CAD and CAM though, storage volume and data processing speeds specific data. It has not been broadly adopted by the were both problems and it was not feasible to industrial communities. implement voluminous documents in databases. Today In addition to these efforts, the Semantic Web and these restrictions are much relieved and even “in XML communities have also started recently to memory database” of terabyte sizes are feasible. address the issues of representing and exchanging Aviation industry documentation should seriously business rules. The Rule Interchange Format (RIF) consider a transition to this form of storage. A central effort within W3C community is such an effort and server in the “Cloud” can go a long ways in providing several recommendations have been published. shared real time data access to many concurrent users. However, to this date, no standard is available to really implement the clear definition of business rules and 4. Metadata Architecture enable machine reasoning to help human decision makings. Recent developments in “Reference Data” or “Master Data” concepts have evolved into a new and 3. Technical Data Storage Architecture powerful technology in support of business applications. The idea is to provide a formal platform As implied by the use of SGML or XML standards, to define and maintain all vocabularies used in a most of the support documentations are stored in business and make it available to all business electronic media amenable to portable usage with functions. dynamic searching capabilities. However, most major Meta data management is by no means a simple aerospace manufacturers have long evolved to using matter. First of all, there is not a single form of full capability computing systems in storing and metadata in use, there are actually infinite variations of managing product related data including design and, different forms. In ATA alone, there are the ATA sometimes, as delivered product configurations. System-Chapter coding system, the SGML DTD Producing SGML/XML based documentation implies specifications, and the data model. The Common a separation of data from it’s source information Warehouse Metamodel (CWM) by the OMG repository. In fact, most manufacturers develop the community provides an extensive presentation of documents within a database supported environment different types of metadata. It included more then a and export the documents when completed. hundred classes that could be implemented to support The SGML/XML documents are mostly stored in the metadata exchange or service functionalities. many separate files under hierarchical filing structures. The ATA “System Chapter” numbering system is Additionally, the document contents are also encoded another type of metadata. It is a classification of in the hierarchical tag structure. All of these pose airplane subsystems and functionalities, represented by serious problems in terms of data reuse and a number coding system. Although the coding is in a configuration management. Hierarchical structures are hierarchical structure, it does provide a convenient very easy for human beings to understand and navigate. recognition tool once the user becomes familiar with However not all information can be kept in one single their meanings. This type of metadata could be hierarchy and often they may be represented by several classified as “Reference Data” or “Master Data” - a different trees. When that is required, people often predefined vocabulary commonly used in a system or resort to keeping replicated data in different files, community. making it impossible to maintain data integrity. With modern database application technology, This is the reason why the relational database has groups of Reference Data and Master Data could be been so successful in supporting business information organized in their specific context. They could be ~ 25 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
managed and controlled in a single authoritative and verified, either by human efforts or even repository and shared by all user communities. automated software application. With such a capability, In 1997, this author provided the basic database the support of automated logical screening of aircraft design for an open data dictionary to the ATA support tasks could become a reality. committee. That design was implemented and marketed by the ATA organization as part of the 4. Conclusions Spec2100 with the branding of “Common Support Data Dictionary” (CSDD – the first digital dictionary Information technology has made incredible in the world. It is in fact a primitive metadata advancements in the last couple of decades. However, management system. the aviation industry tends to lag behind by a This author also further experimented with significant margin as safety issues are the top priority expanding the functionalities for the dictionary to be and certification of a new flight worthy gadget requires able to support multiple inheritance hierarchies. both prohibitively high financial and time investments. What can be done by the aviation community is to If an avionics unit adopts a brand new technology at determine a full collection of well defined reference design inception, it would most likely become obsolete data vocabularies for all the operations and by the time it is certified, maintenance facts, as illustrated earlier in this paper. There is no reason, though, for the support Put these definitions, or “ontology”, into a fully information systems to stand still. IETM is no longer a capable metadata management system. The flawless miracle technology and the community needs maintenance rules can be built based on these ontology to look seriously beyond the horizon. It is especially definitions. critical for a new airplane program to carefully review Further more, an “airplane status register” system the options and select the most promising architecture can be easily built that associates each airplane in implementation that will “fly”. service with the definitions when events occur. Now we have a real time “fact” information system that is “aware” of the airplane state of affairs. Now the maintenance rule and aircraft status can be compared
www.scaae.org ~ 26 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Introduction of Principal Component Analysis and Partial Least Square method
Daguang Zheng, PhD
Abstract: Principal Component Analysis In general, a sophisticated process has (PCA) and Partial Least Square (PLS) have multiple correlated effective variables, or been widely used in data mining, process called inputs. The outputs of the process analysis, root-cause analysis, and process will be affected by those inputs. Let me give optimization, etc. In aerospace industry, you an example. Quality of a heat engineers are dealing with lots of test and exchanger might be affected by martial, manufacturing data. PCA and PLS can be tolerance, hot side flow, cold side flow, used to identify the most critical parameters leakage, number of fins, etc. One task of test or elements to improve the process and data analysis is to figure out which input apply to quality control. In this article, I will variables are critical or have more effects on give a brief introduction of the the quality than other variables. Normally, methodologies. The work presented in this the inputs are not independent of each other, paper is part of my PhD dissertation such as the number of fin vs. tolerance, and research work and has no proprietary leakage vs. flow rate, etc. In mathematical information of General Electric Co. and language, independence means orthogonal. Honeywell International Inc. PCA is one tool to identify the independent components from the correlated inputs. In other words, one principal component is PCA and PLS are statistical tools for data combination of multiple inputs. The analysis of system with multiple variables. extracted uncorrelated components are The objectives are: First, to get lower estimated from the eigenvectors of the dimension of plotting results. Lower covariance matrix of the original variables. dimension means clearer picture of the effective elements. Second, to get lower dimension of quality control specs. Less The sequence of the principal components is quality control specs means less work load from the most critical to the least critical. If a in the QA. Third, to explain the sensitivity threshold is applied, normally the number between Y (output) to certain X (inputs) of critical component is much less than the with weighted and quantified number of original input variables. The measurements. This information is critical measurement of importance is called scores. for optimization. How much an input variable represents in the principal components is called loadings. From the plots of scores and loadings, one
~ 27 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012 can tell which input variables have more Similarly, Figure 3 shows how data contribution. projection onto the second principal component. In true application, the scores are the projection of the residue of the first component projection. In other words, the Variables 123 1 scores on the second principal component is 2 the explanation of the part that the first 3 4 component cannot explain.
objects 5 6 7 Variables
8 Variable 2 1 123 9 2 10 3 4 5 6 Variable 3 7 objects Variable 1 8 9 10 Figure 1. An illustration of multiple Loadings 2 Variable 1 2 3 1 variable system with data points 2 3 4 Variable 3 5 Variable 1 scores 6 7 In Figure 2, green arrows are the scores of 8 9 the projection of data onto the first principal 10 component. In other words, scores are how Figure 3. Illustration of the first and second much the first component can explain the principal components original data.
Difference between PCA and PLS are: Variables 1 123 2 1. PLS is derived from covariance 3 4 matrix of Y (output) to X (inputs). 5 6 7 For example: quality performance vs. objects 8 9 operation parameters 10
Loadings 2 Variable 1 2 3 1 2. PCA is derived from covariance 2 3 matrix of X to X. Then use the PCs 4 Variable 3 5 from the cov(X,X) into regression of
objects 6 Variable 1 7 Y. 8 9 10 PLS regression is a recent technique that Figure 2. Illustration of the first principal generalizes and combines features from components principal component analysis and multiple regression. It is particularly useful when we need to predict a set of dependent variables www.scaae.org ~ 28 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
from a (very) large set of independent linear combination of the scaled variables. variables (i.e., inputs, predictors). The goal Covariance provides a measure of the of PLS regression is to predict Y from X and strength of the correlation between two or to describe their common structure. When Y more sets of random variants. If cov(X,Y)>0, is a vector and X is full rank, this goal could then Y tends to increase as X increases, and be accomplished using ordinary multiple if cov(X,Y)<0, then Y tends to decrease as X regression. When the number of predictors increases. Cov means covariance matrix. is large compared to the number of Decompose of the covariance matrix gives: observations, X is likely to be singular and the regression approach is no longer Yˆ TBC T XPT BC T feasible (i.e., because of multicollinearity). X=TPT
In following section, I will use a real fuel PLS regression finds components from X conversion system as an example to show that are also relevant for Y. Specifically, PLS how the principal components are derived regression searches for a set of components from the real system variables. This system (called latent vectors) that performs a has 7 inputs (affecting variables) and 1 decomposition of covariance matrix of X output (quality). and Y. The decomposition is conducted Figure 4 shows the projection of the with the constraint that these components principal components. The largest one is the explain as much as possible of the most critical component. Apparently, in this covariance between X and Y. This step system the first two components explains generalizes PCA. It is followed by a >95% of the system variance. regression step where the decomposition of
4 X is used to predict Y. x 10 3.5
3
2.5 The following is introduction of 2 e mathematical equation and steps for the ul a v n e analysis tool. Eigenvalues measure the gi 1.5 E
amount of the variation explained by each 1 PC and will be largest for the first PC and 0.5 smaller for the subsequent PCs. An 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 eigenvalue greater than 1 indicates that PCs PC index account for more variance than accounted by one of the original variables in Figure 4. Example – principal components standardized data. This is commonly used (PC) as a cutoff point for which PCs are retained. Eigenvectors provides the weights to Figure 5 shows the loadings of the first two compute the uncorrelated PC, which are the components. Each of the 7 inputs has their projection on the two critical components.
~ 29 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
This plot clearly demonstrates the combination of the centered variables. important of the seven inputs. These uncorrelated PC scores can be used in subsequent analyses to check for Figure 6 is another way to decompose the multivariate normality, to detect first 4 principal components. Those loadings multivariate outliers, and to calculate are quantitative measures of sensitivity of remedial measure in regression analysis the input variables. with severe multi-colliniarity.
14 0.2 12 T 0.15 10 91 8 0.1 87 26551 102 26790 26847 11 100101959789 269270262 50225 7 96 6027226661556249 222 228 131127 6 10510698 9492 27193562635726422722923021229 10185 0.05 109103 99 658866 202322261517 187182142188 130 104 69638658 54255248262315316223224140189190141135129 6425826059261294618 14145128 14619213136186183137184 107108 257256259 23 191496191138 132128126133 4 R 114110 67858468 44 242172182162202192214143 139134 2 115 7470 274274528 5 144178177180176179181124 C CD 0 111112 75 3430 125 P 2 7127672 35255273 234147154148150 C 113 31 32 155233215 2 P 7383 25223627525443 1513 194175123 25333 196212214152 172193174 ANLeak 235213153160 173 ANDP -0.05 117116 77 82 24925142200 2092 195169122 76 37250 1211 121171 0 81 2402773641 210202 167170162 ANPast 247248242 157156207208 168 278 237 118 119 78 79 206205197 166163165 -2 -0.1 38 24623839245 203204 164 279 243244158 198159 239 201 161 -4 241199 CAPast -0.15 120 40 -6 80 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -0.2 PC1 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 PC1
Figure 5. Example: PLS – Loading plot Figure 7. PLS – bi-plot
Figure 7 shows a scares plot of bi-axial plot
PC PC 1 2 onto the first 2 principal components. One 10 15
5 10 example of using this scores plot is to detect
0 s s g g 5 ni ni d d a -5 a outliers in quality control. ol ol 0 -10
-15 -5 T R ANLeak ANDP ANPastCAPast CD T R ANLeak ANDP ANPastCAPast CD
PC PC 3 4 15 15 10 10 In summary, the PCA and PLS are very 5 5 gs gs ni ni d d a 0 a 0 strong data analysis tool. For now, most ol ol -5 -5 applications are in process optimization and -10 -10 T R ANLeak ANDP ANPastCAPast CD T R ANLeak ANDP ANPastCAPast CD quality control. From my experience, PCA and PLS can be easily combined with six- Figure 6. Example – Decomposition of the sigma tools, such as gauge R&R, root-cause PCs (1-4) analysis, fault-tree, normality test, and trend detection, etc. If you are interested in this topic, please feel free to contact me. I Principal component (PC) scores are the am glad to provide you with more detail derived composite scores computed for discussion. each observation based on the eigenvectors for each PC. The means of PC scores are equal to zero, as these are the linear www.scaae.org ~ 30 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mishap Analysis
- David W. Lin
1. Introduction
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) has proven its worth on the battlefields of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon. UAV offers a relatively low-cost, low-risk alternative to manned aircraft in the military setting. The same advantages have led many to see natural applications for UAVs in a domestic setting.
Mishap cited in this paper refers an unexpected UAV accident that might be caused by human operational error, hardware component failure, etc.
According to the statistics of Aircraft Crashes Record Office in Geneva, Switzerland, a total of 121,870 people have lost their lives in 17,369 accidents in one hundred years of aviation history (1905-2005)
U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board (AIB) reports 90 large drone crashes from January, 2007 to December, 2011, and 25 large drone crashes have occurred in 2011.
The high mishap rate of UAV’s in operational service is frequently cited as a deterrent to more widespread deployment and one limiting factor towards utilization of UAV to operate in civil airspace.
2. Mishap Rate and Example
UAVs have had a higher mishap rate than traditional manned aircraft. Based on a report of 2005, the Air Force’s RQ-1 Predator had 32 times as many mishaps per flight-hour when compared to general, manned aviation, the Navy’s RQ-2 Pioneer more than 300 times as many mishaps, and the Army’s RQ-5 Hunter nearly 60 times as many (Ref. 1).
Currently, the UAV mishap rate is 100 times higher than that of manned aircraft. There is approximately one mishap for every 1000 flight hours. Approximately half (between 33% and 67%) of these mishaps are attributed to aircraft failure (Ref. 2). The relatively high failure rate is likely caused by relaxed design assurance methods and system reliability. There is a general perception that this aircraft failure rate,
~ 31 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
about one per 2000 hours, is unacceptable for operation in crowded civil airspace because of the risk to public safety on the ground and air traffic.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has conducted three inquiries concerning domestic UAV crashes. In April 2006, a Predator UAV used by the United States Customs and Border Protection Service crashed into the Arizona desert when its operators turned off its engine. When one of the Predator’s two ground control stations locked up during flight, its operator switched to the other station but neglected to “align the consoles,” inadvertently cutting off the platform’s fuel supply. As the UAV lost power during flight, it began to “shed electrical equipment to conserve electrical power.” (Ref. 4) Although no one on the ground was injured, “the accident didn’t help the UAV industry’s reputation.” (Ref. 4) The UAV glided as close to 100 feet from two homes before striking the ground; homeowners heard the crash and thought a bomb had exploded. The NTSB attributed the crash to inadequate surveillance of the program, pilot error, and inadequate maintenance procedures performed by the manufacturer.
In November 2008, another Predator crashed while performing touch-and-go landings near Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The aircraft slid 1500 feet along a runway on its main gear and optical payload ball after its nose wheel assembly failed on landing. There were no injuries.
In 2008, an experimental Raytheon Cobra collided with a stadium light pole at the United States Air Force Academy while conducting a preprogrammed landing near Colorado Springs. No one was injured. Accidents like these have thankfully caused no injuries to date, but widespread use of UAVs in the domestic setting would inevitably produce casualties and property loss as a result of crashes or objects falling from airborne UAVs.
3. Mishap Analysis
Following factors are the major causes of UAV mishap: x Human Factor x Aircraft Reliability x Aircraft Maintenance x Environmental Effect
Figure 1 shows the mishap rate across different types of UAV. The data is based on the mishaps occurring between the late 90’s and 2004. (Ref. 2) www.scaae.org ~ 32 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Figure 1. Mishap Percentage Across UAVs
3.1 Human Factor The human factors that could contribute to UAV mishap include these aspects: • Workload, • Fatigue, • Situational Awareness, • Crew Coordination, • Training
Nearly half the operators of UAV have high levels of job-related stress, mostly linked to long and erratic work hours because of a tremendous increase in the use of the aircraft, the Air Force said in a new study conducted by the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine. (Ref. 5)
3.2 Aircraft Reliability Following factors are main reasons that impact the UAV reliability: • Design Flaws - In the avionics software and in the operator user interface (in the ground station) • Cost Reduction - One of the main advantages in use of UAV is its low-cost, which leads no or limited redundancy of the system • Component Failure - Components used in UAV do not meet the standard as used in civil aviation
3.3 Aircraft Maintenance Unlike conventional aircraft maintenance, UAV maintenance personnel must ensure the reliability of an entire system that comprises the vehicle, the ground station, and communication equipment.
As an example of UAV maintenance, about 168 people are needed to keep a single Predator aloft for 24 hours, according to the Air Force. The larger Global
~ 33 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
Hawk surveillance drone requires 300 people. In contrast, an F-16 fighter aircraft needs fewer than 100 people per mission.
3.4 Environmental Effect • Noise • Illumination • Weather conditions (e.g., precipitation, temperature, humidity, pressure, wind, and lightning, etc.)
4. Conclusion
The reliability of UAVs needs to improve by one to two orders of magnitude to reach the equivalent level of safety of manned aircraft. In general, the higher the safety and reliability objective, the more rigorous the regulations and the operational restrictions applied. However, the benefit of a higher level of safety and reliability comes at a cost.
The rapid rise in UAV employment has been accompanied by increased attention to their high mishap rates which are several orders of magnitude greater than the manned aviation. Such high rates have negative implications for UAV affordability and mission availability and are unacceptable by both military operations and the public.
It is imperative to address UAV mishap rates now so that their full potential is realized. Although technology is continuously improving, the frequency of system failures can only be expected to rise, since the opportunity for both human and hardware failures increase with system complexity, and rapidly developing technologies involve ever increasing complexity.
REFERENCES
1. U.S. Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mishaps: Assessment of the Role of Human Factors Using Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), USAF 311TH HUMAN SYSTEMS WING, Mar. 2005. 2. Williams, K.W., “A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications”, FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK. 3. UAV FAILURE RATE CRITERIA FOR EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY David W. King, Allen Bertapelle, Chad Moses, 2005 4. NTSB PROBABLE CAUSE REPORT CHI06MA121, available at http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20060509X00531&key=1. 5. “Air Force Drone Operators Report High Levels of Stress” The New York Times, December 19, 2011. www.scaae.org ~ 34 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
Future, Challenge and Opportunity-Chinese Aerospace Ambition -Tony J Pan
Introduction
Since the launch of ARJ21 in March 2002, China is on its mission to develop civil airplanes that can eventually put China head to head with Boeing and Airbus. This is a dream come true for generations of Chinese. Chinese government has been providing significant amount of financial and human capitals in to the industry. Failure is not considered to be an option on this effort for the country.
As projected by Boeing and other aerospace agencies, the Chinese commercial aviation market will become the world's second biggest after the U.S by 2030. China will need 4,400 to 5,000 new jets, valued at up to US$600 billion. Doubling another bright region, Latin America, where it is estimated to need 2,500 new commercial planes by 2032.
In 2010, Chinese airlines welcomed aboard 267 million passengers, in 1980 it was just 3.4 million, a number second only to the U.S. with over 500 million. That represented a 15% increase compared to 2009 as the country's airline market steadily heads towards the stratosphere.
In business jet market, expansion has been very aggressive as well. The number of business jets in China is expected to grow to 2,360 in the next 20 years from just under 170 today, according to Bombardier.
China's business jet industry has grown in concert with the country's increasingly sophisticated business community, which must access markets all over the world as well as reach corporate offices in Hong Kong, where many companies are publicly listed.
Aerospace is deemed a sector of strategic importance. China plans to add 78 new airports in the next decade. Another interesting sign of rapid growth of Chinese aviation industry is the lack of qualified pilots in the coming years. Chinese airlines have been hiring thousands foreign pilots to satisfy the growing demand.
Airbus and Boeing want to maintain their share of the booming market, but a much talked-about mission to create China's own civil aircraft business is aiming to challenge their dominance in a few years’ time.
Big Plane
The country is building its first large airliner, the C919, to compete with Boeing and Airbus. Outfitted with technology from GE Aviation and Honeywell International Inc., the Chinese craft is expected to begin service in 2016.
The first batch of the C919 planes will use the advanced LEAP-X1C engines, which are installed in Boeing and Airbus SAS aircraft. The imported engine, jointly developed by General Electric and Safran SA, is expected to lower fuel consumption by 13 to 15 percent. However, development of a Chinese- made engine for the airliner is currently under way, the codenamed "Yangtze 1000” will be installed later.
~ 35 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
The C919’s list of Western suppliers include Moog Aircraft Group, which supplies the airplane’s high-lift system, including all flap and slat actuation, pilot interfaces, electronic controls, power drive units, wing- tip brakes, gearboxes and miscellaneous components. Honeywell and GE are among the companies that will supply the aircraft's avionics. Germany’s Liebherr Aerospace, will supply the C919’s air management system and landing gear with China’s AVIC Landing gear Advanced Manufacturing Corporation (LAMC).
Besides the commercial airliners, China is not resting on its development of general aviation segment. The state-run China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co. acquired aircraft maker Cirrus Aviation of Duluth, Minn., last year and Epic Aircraft, a manufacturer of small planes in Bend, Ore., the year before. The Aviation Industry Corp. of China paid $186 million in 2010 to acquire Teledyne Continental Motors, a Mobile, Ala., and manufacturer of piston engines for small aircraft.
In the latest sign of China's rising importance in the global aviation industry, Cessna Aircraft Co. said it would develop a plan to build business jets with the state-owned Aviation Industry Corp. of China. Other players in the sector such as France's Dassault Falcon and Gulfstream are seriously considering following suit.
Challenge
While industry players doubt that the C919 will make a dent in Boeing and Airbus's market shares in the narrow-bodies segment, there is no doubting the political ambition of China in bringing the program to fruition. While Comac is still a newcomer on the aircraft manufacturers' scene, the strong support it has from the Chinese government will ensure that it at least creates a product that will have a substantial presence in the domestic market eventually.
A Boeing executive made the following comment a few years ago, “For China, the challenge is enormous since it lacks experience of even small general aircraft development. These challenges will come from technology, supplier chain, system integration, and marketing and service. But ultimately its success will come down to the bottom-line, and how much it will cost to buy and operate. How much money the C919 will be able to save airlines is still not clear, especially as both Boeing and Airbus have come up with re- engineered variants of the 737 and A320”.
There is a strong believe in the industry that China still remains decades from competing internationally, at least in terms of the market for larger jets. The country’s biggest obstacle is learning supply chain management providing ongoing support services for a global fleet of airplanes—rather than the challenge of simply manufacturing the planes.
China's bid to break Airbus SAS and Boeing Co.'s stranglehold on the global aircraft market is being hindered by a four-year delay in delivering the nation's first passenger jet. The first delivery of COMAC's 90-seat ARJ21 has slipped by at least four years from a previously planned 2007 debut.
The delays to the ARJ21 could affect the timing of development of the newer C919 for Comac, whose engineering resources have become stretched due to the continuing need for their engagement on the regional jet, which has been under development for longer than planned. www.scaae.org ~ 36 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
If look at Brazil, Embraer started about thirty years ago building turboprops, and they had some success selling those in the international market. In thirty years’ time, Embraer has become a very strong player in the regional jet business with one hundred seats and less. But they haven’t stepped into the market space Boeing and Airbus play in yet after thirty years in this business.
Does the Chinese need to follow the similar timeframe? The answer from Chinese is no. “Conventionally one shall master building smaller airplanes before you jump into the larger ones because the level of technology needed to build a competitive product gets higher as you go up in size.” An industry executive said. “The trend in the industry is to have more and more of the airplane built outside of your company. The Chinese have virtually no experience doing this. To learn that is the hard part of the business for them. Making the plane is the easy part.”
Aerospace industry is a relative segregated industry where hardware used on aircrafts are uniquely designed, tested and certified. Sharing common parts and material with other industries is not common. Sharing common parts and subsystem on different aircraft platforms is also rare even though it is preferred by the airframers. Certification process is very tedious, rigorous, costly and time consuming. Interchangeable aftermarket parts require the same quality and certification process as the OEM parts do. Therefore, the bar to enter the aerospace industry is fairly high, especially at the higher tier level. Due to the long development cycle, the demand for human and financial capitals is substantially high. It will take years to have investment return. There are also pretty tight restrictions from the U.S. government in terms of export licensing as well.
~ 37 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
If one understands how Chinese aerospace industry has been evolved in last 30 years, it is not hard to understand why experienced engineers especially those who have been through full life cycle aircraft system development, and are able to develop and manage system requirements and effectively execute developing program are in big shortage. There are lacks of experts who are able to detect potential problem early enough in the development process and solve these problem systematically.
Many Chinese sub tier suppliers may not be prepared to support China’s ambition to develop jetliner such as C919. It is not an easy job to build the infrastructure to the level that their western peers have been building for decades and meet the international standard. They may lack the will or not even realize the need to do so. For example, there is a common perception from western partners that Chinese engineers and workers are strong on mastering technologies but lacks of process concepts or not paying enough attention to comply with processes. This will create potential risk of miscommunication and mis- producing down the road.
Engineering and production processes are vehicles to take the design on the paper to a certifiable airplane. It is much easier to find very talent, engineers and technicians who speaks good English and are able to design very complicated systems, but it could be a daunting task to find those who can understand and implement processes. Some established companies may have their own processes in place for years and are in conflict with standard industry processes and may need to unlearn them.
Opportunity
Like Automobile industry in China, aerospace industry seems to entering an exponential expansion in next 10 years. It presents opportunities for the entire industry. Every challenge presents opportunity. From as small as a rivet to as complicated as an engine, China has the potential and desire to do it all.
China has been building its aerospace industry for decades with predominantly state owned enterprises, in a self-sufficient business model. It mainly serves its military aircraft development need. These companies usually lack the ability to compete internationally. The most common success is to make hardware that was designed by western companies. For example, Boeing has purchased more than a billion dollars’ worth of hardware, and has active contracts in place for billions more. However, most hardware that Chinese companies are supplying is aluminum and metal structure components such as tail section, the vertical fin and the horizontal stabilizer as examples. High value components like composite parts, engine and avionics are not as large percent as structures. The engine manufacturers GE, Rolls Royce, and Pratt & Whitney have been doing subcontracting work in China for some time.
The US and other western industrialized countries are still holding most key technologies and remain dominance in the industry. They have developed supply base that are sufficient and efficient. However, China can offer opportunity for the industry to trim down the cost of manufactured parts since its labor cost is still relatively attractive even though it has been on the rise. Some expert suggested that Chinese manufactures also can do better in managing the entire cost structure, meaning more efficiency.
With the full support of all levels of government, resources can be mobilized as needed for the aerospace industry. As mentioned, many western aerospace companies have already set deep footings into Chinese aerospace industry by setting up subsidiaries, joint ventures and Chinese local suppliers. Chinese local www.scaae.org ~ 38 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
governments are setting up aerospace industry development zones for investors. There are plenty of voids in china’s broad and qualified supplier base. The industry is also attracting more top talented college graduates and Chinese oversea students.
China is currently taking a so called top-down approach. COMAC, as an airframer, taps into all existing system suppliers in the world for hardware and technologies needed to make the airplane. This is nothing different from Airbus, Boeing and other airframers’ approach to make their airplanes. This is a proven and wise approach which takes china to the international aerospace market in a relatively short period of time. But for a country like China who does not have broad base of qualified suppliers. This approach provides little help to many sub-tier suppliers. Chinese sub tier suppliers have limited access to the platform since traditionally China does not have a good presents in the international aerospace industry. China certainly acknowledges the situation and is doing its best to help them. GE AVIC joint venture is a good example of such effort. However, this may prove that it is still not enough considering the number of parts used on an airplane and the knowledge base required to put an airplane together. Large percentage of know-how for each component is in component supplier’s hands.
To become a strong aerospace player, intellectual proprietary is the key. The best way to obtain IP is to participate in aircraft development for many sub-tier suppliers. They can take advantage of the big plane building, to obtain intellectual property and to experience full life cycle development. C919 is a best vehicle for them. Local companies shall also be encouraged to participate biding in international market.
For local companies who want to participate in the current growth, most certainly it will have a need to overhaul and align its operating system and process with international standard. This requires not only expertise in technology, but more importantly in program/project/production management; not only in production hardware and software, but in manufacturing and testing equipment and software, and trainings to its entire engineering and production staff.
Besides manufacturing of hardware, the industry in the west usually requires variety disciplines of services such as material and component distribution, aftermarket repair, testing, engineering, and training.
A lot of daily used tools in the west are not necessarily adapted by Chinese companies or properly used. This is a great opportunity for them to take advantage of all latest tools available to put them in the competitive edge. These tools include design, simulation, configuration management, MRP, requirement management, and testing.
Risk shall not be overlooked in this challenged industry. Its complex, lengthy, high sensibility and reliability nature puts the business in a different level from others. The culture and business environmental settings may also become a potential difference maker.
~ 39 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
Ӓछᖂོོണ!
!ԟ ! !۠ Ϛᇄӈོڞԙҳ۠ԟӵߴ໌ᇄᆰ៖ӵछ၂ЊώแৱᆋआȂҏོڞछЊώแৱ Ιϸࣀଢ଼ࣱᔖᒳԈछݲོڞࡾҰȂҏڏڧღЅޥтڏդϱѴࢇݽࣀଢ଼ȂζϚ឴ܻӈդ !ೣۡȄޟڙࡡЅড়Ԥᜰᐠ३
ོষၥਿ! ޟ้ࣺЊԤᜰΠԑоΰܖҗδۨҕȂՍЍԤᏰρᏰ՝ܖԤछϴҕڎҏོོষၥਿ ώհငᡛȂϷོོষΝ࿋ณᖂོོষȄ!
ོ! ! ണ! ȷӪᆎȂҬࠉ೩оήέএϷོȈོڞҏོᖂོॏӪȶछЊώแৱ !ོڞȆछՙछЊώแৱ ! ! ʳʳʳ "% ! ! !!" !ོڞȆछࠒछЊώแৱ ! ! ʳʳʳ "% ! ! ! #" !ོڞȆछՙѕछЊώแৱ ! ! ʳʳʳ "% ! ! ! "$!" ӨϷོᐿҳՌкȂϷོོണоϚுܰញᖂོོണ࣏ྥࠌȄ ҥϷོ௰ᙨҡȈٱᖂོ౩ Ι՝ȄٱϷོོষΙԻΡоή೩ॏѲΡஅྥȂؐቨёΙԻΡё౩ ᒵюȂӈΙԑȂᒵџӈΙԩ࣏३ȄོٱߝȃོߝȂҥ౩ٱᖂོ೩Ԥ౩ ߝȄٱᐊӈȂӨϷོོߝϚுᐊӈᖂོོߝЅ౩ٱߝᇄོߝϚџҥӣΙϷོ౩ٱ౩ ᖞᒲσऋंܖԑѐȂގԑོȃюܒᇄӫհȂᖞᒲӒ܁Һޟ፡ӨϷོϞڞᖂོᄇϱ ȄۣٱଆོȂᄇѴ౩ᖒȃӫհȃҺࢺȂࣁ้Өࣀଢ଼ џငོٱӵӴ࣏ྥȂ౩ܚоؐԑՍЍѢΙԩ࣏নࠌȂᖂོོ֭о࿋ԑᖂོߝོٱᖂོ౩ юৰЅٱᖒဍѢȂଶོണѪೣۡѴȂӈդඪਰငҥႆјኵ౩ٱ౩ ܖߝȃོߝٱҥ౩ ႆјኵᜓԙՄႆȄٱюৰ౩ ԑߑؚۡȄོؐٱາȂߜҥᖂོ౩ོٱӪᛴҺᖂོ౩ٱϷོؐԑࡸྱ௰ᙨ౩ ႆȄٱင юৰ౩ٮȂོٱё౩ٱՍЍሯौ Ӓᡝ౩ٱওۡᖂོོണЅጫջ౩ ߝЅོߝᙛ᠌Ȉٱ౩ ȂкࡻᒵᖞȂ௰ଢ଼ོЅีॎგȄོٱߝȈѢ౩ٱ౩ ߝߣဍȟȄᄇѴࣀଢ଼ȂٱႆЅ౩ོٱߝȈஈོȂᖞᒲࣀଢ଼Ѕᆓ౩้Ȟငႆ౩ོ ߝ࣏ΠфߒȄٱߝ࣏ΙфߒȂ౩ོ www.scaae.org ~ 40 ~ No. 27 2012 ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ
ོষҧߒ! ( $ ,/(! #$' + & *$ ' *(+) '"$' *+ !຺ל࡙යਜ͈̌ൿय
$6( (&(,8(' ############### ! ɛʳ $/,)241,$ ɛʳ 6$6(52)"$5+,1*621 4(*21
ɛʳ .& & *+#$) /($5(&203/(6((16,4()420 ɛʳ & *+#$)* ' . % /($5((16(41$0($1'&+$1*(521/;
$0(1*/,5+ ############################### +,1(5( ############################# ,46+$6( #################### ,46+ /$&( #################### ɛ ! ,6,<(1 ɛ (40$1(16 (5,'(1&( ''4(55 ######################################################################### (/ )),&( #################### 20( #####################$: #################### 0$,/$''4(55 #######################################
&)%(/& ', !!203$1; #################################### 2% ,6/(######################## !!''4(55 ##################################################################### !!:3(46,5(2%'(5&4,36,2124$66$&+73'$6('4(570(
! * ' /($5(/,56$6/($5621(3(45219+2,5)$0,/,$49,6+;274342)(55,21$/(:3(4,(1&( !!$0( ########################## 203$1; ################# (/ ###############
- ,$(' !! &+22/ ##########################$-24#################### (*4(( ############
& *+#$) /($5(0$.(&+(&.3$;$%/(62 $1'0$,/62 !!24 +,* "$(' %$!(*'$ $/0 6(44,625 +21( !!24 * "$(' +#$'",('* "(' 4'8((//(87(" +21( ɛ ''- %- !!!!!ɛ $! ,$& & *+#$)
~ 41 ~ www.scaae.org ౺⇾ⓧ⎵ठ֠ሳ౺Ӥ No. 27 2012
SCAAE⇾ⓧ⎵ठడỄో֠ሳ ڂᖝʝሳ
ૹचᓎ! Ꮴࡺ߅! ཬฦ! ዚऑ ૹᅚ! ՁАҲ! Ͳྼૃ! ᧅನᖁ ⚄ሎ⋞ !لՁᐶರ! ਂຯ !ڻᄿ ! ୲! ၏ऩ! ⟪ᐄ͚! !ฦྼය !۽ڑ !җ२ !ऩ! ໄखӭ !ڑ !দઇ ! ̙! ᆑ߅ο! є! ! Ңઇૺ! гః! ҳ! ရ! !Пٙᙠ! Ͱߊ̸! ҳૢԁ Ѯხັ! ሇฦ̇ο! ᒻ́ї! ѥШ᜕! Փ͝! ᆑ! ܩ! !ܶϓ! Փϑ̙! ຎഄ !ՓҊ̭! ݐሬ !ڟЌ !ڮๅ! దԟ˱! ૪߷˙ ࣯໙! ഻̇ތ! ቼҰጘ! ߷! ᅇ! ም! ᎕! Ӓ! ࠉ! ࡦሃਅ! ᩈ! ᆆ! ਾܱឡ! !ୀᚇ! Ꮇ֢! ዐ́Ќ฿ ฿ে˫! ቼጫ! Ձ! ሇ! ߞܚ෩! ቻϑය! ᙹᆙ ͔߰૿! づȭ !ةॲϑ
www.scaae.org ~ 42 ~ 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address CHAN LEO 陈鹏建 (O) N W 19204 IVORY WAY ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748 (H) CHANG DANIEL 张海明 AEM, INC 858-481-0210X1250 (O) N W 11525 SORRENTO VALLEY RD. SAN DIEGO CA 92121 (H) CHANG DAVID 張 秩 TRW (O) N W 5317 ARVADA ST TORRANCE CA 90503 (H) CHANG JAMES 張振邦 AEROSPACE CORP. 310-336-5625 (O) N W 1708 N. MOUNTAIN VIEW PL. FULLERTON CA 92831 714-870-9187 (H) CHANG KAUNG JAIN 章廣建 ROCKETDYNE (O) N W 5859 LARBOARD LANE AGOURA CA 91301 (H) CHANG MING 張明 BOEING 562-593-8121 (O) N W [email protected] 2985 PRIMROSE AVE. BREA CA 92671 714-996-2225 (H) CHANG JULIAN* 張家聲 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (O) 13363 RUSTY FIG CIR CERRITOS CA 90703 (H) CHANG SHIH HOW 張世厚 (O) N W 3404 ORANGEWOOD IRVINE CA 92618 (H) CHAO CHARLES* 趙和治 SOLAR TURBINE INC. 310-225-4118 (O) Y W [email protected], 5317 WILMA ST TORRANCE CA 90503 310-542-5351 (H) CHAO WILLIAM F. 趙烽 Callenge Global Investment & Trading Inc. 818-895-7707 (O) N W 3001 LAZY MEADOW DR TORRANCE CA 90505 310-325-2421 (H) CHAU STEVEN 周樹雄 BOEING 562-593-5365 (O) N W [email protected] 824 S. Stoneman Ave. #14 Alhambra CA 91801 626-576-1788 (H) 626-374-7730 (C) CHEN BILL* 陳淳 GE POWER SYSTEMS 310-493-7947 (O) Y W [email protected] 5537 LITTLEBOW ROAD RPV CA 90275 (H) CHEN CHEN * 陈琛 (O) Y W chenchen@China heartbmd.com Suite 313, bld A2, 218 Xinhua Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 214125, China (H) CHEN HSI-SHU* 陳西書 SCIENCE & TECH. CORP 949-837-5618 (O) N W [email protected] 24951 HON AVE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 949-837-1067 (H) CHEN JOHN 陳治宏 NORTHROP (O) N W [email protected], BOX 2182 RHE CA 90274 (H) CHEN JOSEPH C.* 陳中 AJILON (O) Y W [email protected], 19472 CORALWOOD DR. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 (H) CHEN KELLY J. 陳瑞宏 (O) N W 1173 MAERTZWEILER DR PLACENTIA CA 92870 (H) CHEN MARK A. 陳逸材 HONEYWELL (O) N W 21714 TALISMAN ST TORRANCE CA 90503 310-316-1481 (H) CHEN MING CHENG 陳名正 AEROSPACE CORP 310-336-8916 (O) N W [email protected], 3630 OLEANDER ST SEAL BEACH CA 90740 (H) CHEN NAN JIM 陳南瑾 BOEING 562-593-5370 (O) N W [email protected] 13729 CAPRISTRANO RD. LAMIRADA CA 90638 562-694-3728 (H) CHEN PHILIP C. 陳黔海 APEX COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 562-926-6820 (O) N W [email protected] 8142 VILLAVERDE DR. WHITTER CA 90605 562-789-9888 (H) CHEN ROBERT P. 陳澎 HONEYWELL 310-512-3568 (O) N W 22820 VAN DEENE AVE. TORRANCE CA 90502 310-830-1684 (H)
Member List - Page 1 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address CHEN SAMMY BOEING (O) N W 10062 VALLEY FORGE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 (H) CHEN SEAN 陳長恒 INFORMATIN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT SOLUTION 626-715-8234 (O) N W [email protected] 1506 HALLGREEN DR., WALNUT CA 91789 909-595-7886 (H) CHEN SHIH H. 陳世雄 BOEING ROCKETDYNE 310-336-8916 (O) N W 3970 CALLE DEL SOL THOUSAND OAKS CA 91360 (H) CHEN SHIN 陳思行 AEROSPACE CORP (O) N W 12763 ALCARE ST CERRITOS CA 90703 (H) CHEN SUSAN 洪淑貞 BOEING ROCKWELL 562-593-9121 (O) N W [email protected] PO BOX 10084 FULLERTON CA 92838 714-879-4498 (H) CHEN WEI L. 陳偉賚 UNIV. OF CENTRAL FLORIDA 407-275-2245 (O) N W 3672 JOHN ANDERSON DR ORMOND BEACH FL 32176 904-673-8888 (H) CHEN WILLIE* 陳烈偉 HUGHES (O) Y W 5623 MISTRIDGE DR RPV CA 90274 310-541-5538 (H) CHENG DENNIS 鄭江 BOEING (O) N W LONG BEACH CA 90801 (H) CHENG PAUL C. 鄭傳海 MARTIN MARIETTA (O) N W [email protected] 3787 E. PHILLIPS CIR. LITTLETON CO 80122 303-770-0330 (H) CHEUNG CHRISTOPHER K. 張國忠 BOEING 425-717-8185 (O) N W [email protected] 1912 MARIPOSA LANE FULLERTON CA 92833 714-879-4936 (H) CHI CHENG-CHING* 吉承鏡 MOOG CO. 310-618-7215 (O) Y W 30121 MATISSE DR. RPV CA 90275 310-541-7078 (H) CHIANG GEORGE S. 姜西華 BOEING 562-496-5793 (O) Y W [email protected] 1089 EL CAMPO DR. PASADENA CA 91107 626-396-9213 (H) CHIANG KEN 蔣光燦 BOEING 805-371-7164 (O) N W 5408 JON DODSON DR AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 818-991-1921 (H) CHIANG TED T. 江德賢 FORD AEROSPACE 301-805-0446 (O) N W 22 HOLLYBERRY CT ROCKVILLE MD 20852 301-881-0874 (H) CHIANG TIEN-HON 蔣天鴻 CAST INTERNATIONAL (O) N W 3 ANDALUCIA IRVINE CA 92714 (H) CHIANG WEI-SHING* 江維新 HONEYWELL 310-512-2606 (O) N W 21415 CHIRPING SPARROW DIAMOND BAR CA 91760 909-396-9066 (H) CHIEN PATRIC* 錢感曾 BIRCHWOOD INTERNATIONAL (O) Y W 12325 KERRAN ST STE.B POWAY CA 92064 858-689-9886 (H) CHIEN JOHN C. 簡崇仁 (O) N W 9341 LARKSPUR DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 (H) CHIEN RAYMOND 簡光和 RKC METALLURGICAL INC 317-230-6737 (O) Y W P.O.BOX 420, SC-R12 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46206-0420 317-230-2872 (H) CHIN PHILIP C. 金駿禔 PARKER HANNIFIN (O) N W 8752 DOLPHIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 714-968-2352 (H) CHOU VICTOR 周勝年 BOEING (O) N W 3 HOPKINS ST IRVINE CA 92715 714-786-0187 (H) CHOW BENJAMIN 周斌 BOEING (O) Y W 7871 BARBI LN LA PALMA CA 90623 (H)
Member List - Page 2 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address CHOW EDMOND* 周光武 (O) Y W P.O. BOX 389 SAN GABRIEL CA 91778 (H) CHU CARY 朱啟杰 BOEING 562-982-7625 (O) N W 13007 WARREN AV L.A. CA 90066 310-390-4865 (H) CHU MING-YUH* 朱名譽 NORTHROP 310-371-7134 (O) N W [email protected] 19135 FIRMONA AVE TORRANCE CA 90503 310-542-5638 (H) CHU PAUL 朱德玉 LITTON 818-715-4977 (O) N W 12730 MONTANA AVE. LA CA 90049 310-829-5147 (H) CHU TSANN HSIN 朱燦忻 BOEING ROCKWELL (O) N W 20214 AVENIDA PAMPLONA CERRITOS CA 90703 562-860-5453 (H) CHUNG Y.T. 鍾永政 BOEING 714-896-3311 (O) N W 12375 ANDY ST. CERRITOS CA 90703 562-860-2482 (H) CHWA RICHARD 蔡松 BOEING (O) N W 4236 ARICA AVE ROSEMEAD CA 91770 (H) CUI EDWARD 崔洪波 HONEYWELL 310-512-2002 (O) W [email protected] 1128 S. ELMOLINO ST. ALHAMBRA CA 626)457-8264 (H) CUI PETER Y. 崔亚飞 DEUTSCH METAL COMPONENTS 310-323-6200 (O) 537 N. COLGATE ST ANAHEIM CA 92801 714-229-9459 (H) DING GANG 丁刚 626-290-2622 (O) [email protected] 30 Ridge Valley Irvine CA 92618 949-932-0386 (H) DUNN MIKE 鄧德邁 BOEING ROCKETDYNE (O) [email protected] 1707 HERRIN ST. REDONDO BEACH CA 90278 310-318-6362 (H) FAN JASON* 范哲源 AMERITCH AEROSPACE (O) 119 E SANT JOSEPH ST, #A ARCADIA CA 91006 (H) FANG JAMES J. 方日進 BOEING ROCKETDYNE (O) N W 21300 GERMAIN ST CHATSWORTH CA 91311 818-998-1671 (H) FUNG JOHN W. 馮強長 BOEING (O) N W 212 WEST LINDA VISTA #C ALHAMBRA CA 91801 (H) GUO BRIAN 郭英培 PARKER AEROSPACE (O) W [email protected] 14300 ALTON IRVINE CA 92618 619-8389518 (H) HO SEAN 何鴻志 BOEING 562-922-5859 (O) N W [email protected], 12824 HERITAGE PL. CERRITOS CA 90703 562-924-2866 (H) HO MARK 何子平 BOEING (O) N W 8370 GALLATIN RD DOWNEY CA 90240 562-861-4610 (H) HONG SU-DON 洪賜當 SIDA CORP. (O) N W 10551 E. DANBURY ST. TEMPLE CITY CA 91780 (H) HONG YUAN* 洪远 BOEING 562-982-2759 (O) [email protected] 9367 CHRISTOPHER STR. CYPRESS CA 90630 714-220-2766 (H) HU JUN 胡軍 BOEING 562-593-0157 (O) N W 9521 ROSE ST. BELLFLOWER CA 90706 562-866-8008 (H) [email protected] HSEU BILL 許世賢 EATON CORP. 310-643-9938 (O) N W 27 MALLORCA LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 714-495-7138 (H) HSIA YEU-CHUAN 夏雨川 BOEING (O) N W 11765 MONTE LEON WAY NORTHRIDGE CA 91326 818-368-4554 (H)
Member List - Page 3 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address HSIEH ALBERT R. 謝若松 eCONNECTIONS, INC. (O) N W 13332 PRESIDIO PLACE TUSTIN CA 92782 714-505-3795 (H) HSU TOM 許同光 310-512-5733 (O) N W 9212 MOLT RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 (H) HU PAUL 胡名浦 BOEING 562-593-5298 (O) N W 18404 MANSEL AV REDONDO BEACH CA 90278 310-371-4737 (H) HUANG FRANK 黃重照 714-559-8143 (O) N W 11 SARATOGA IRVINE CA 92715 (H) HUANG IKE 黃福照 HONEYWELL 310-512-1620 (O) N W 2535 E. VISTA PORINT DR. ORANGE CA 92667 714-921-4775 (H) HUANG LOUIS* 黃啟鵬 SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEM CENTER 310-363-6436 (O) N W 30115 AVENIDA TRANQUILA RPV CA 90275 310-377-9162 (H) HUANG TAI 黃台 BOEING 562-982-5718 (O) N W [email protected] 28195 MEADOW LAND DR YORBA LINDA CA 92687 714-692-2361 (H) HUANG YULI 黃毓驪 BOEING 562-593-5383 (O) N W [email protected] 1829 PROSPECT AVE HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254 310-279-3356 (H) HWANG YATSUN* 黃益三 TRW 310-814-5734 (O) N W [email protected], 5962 PRIEST DR. LA PALMA CA 90623 714-828-5412 (H) JAI RAYMOND B. 翟本鈺 HONEYWELL 310-512-5457 (O) N W 7011 WILLOWTREE DR RPV CA 90274 310-541-1004 (H) JEN YUAN 任元 BOEING NORTH AMERICA (O) N W 6391 ACACIA HILL DR. YORBA LINDA CA 92886 (H) JOU RICHARD 周慶隆 FORTUNE CNC INC (O) N W 7803 E. BRIARWOOD ORANGE CA 92669 (H) KAN HAN-PING 甘漢鑌 NORTHROP GRUMMAN 562-332-5285 (O) 12733 LUCAS ST. CERRITOS CA 90703 562-926-4528 (H) KAO ALMON S. 高學武 BOEING 562-982-9641 (O) N W [email protected] 2260 ROANOKE RD SAN MARINO CA 91108 818-308-0080 (H) KAO MIKE P. 高本木 310-512-4078 (O) N W 17543 MONDIND DR. ROWLAND HTS CA 91748 (H) KHO CHIAN H. 許箭發 EDS 909-736-1930 (O) N W 1973 STARFIRE AVE CORONA CA 91719 909-229-8353 (H) KING WILLIAM 金榮耀 BOEING 310-816-1394 (O) N W [email protected] 740 TERRACE DR LONG BEACH CA 90807 310-423-5088 (H) KLEIN JACLYN 劉效其 BOEING 562-593-5234 (O) N W [email protected] 2738 DEERFORD ST. LAKEWOOD CA 90712 (H) KO SHANNON* 柯金象 CHEN-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. 949-855-6716 (O) 25622 RAPID FALLS LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 949-362-6549 (H) KUAN KAIN H. 關健興 BOEING (O) N W 1806 KELLEHER PL PLACENTIA CA 92670 (H) KUEI STEVE C.* 桂正岡 310-512-2701 (O) N W 12909 CHAPARRAL RIDGE S.D. CA 92130 858-481-9612 (H) KUNG RU-LI 龔汝立 ALLIED-SIGNAL (O) N W 21210 CORRAL CT WALNUT CA 91789 (H)
Member List - Page 4 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address KUO KENNETH 郭維新 BOEING (O) N W 20515 LAKE CANYON DR. WALNUT CA 91789 (H) KUO SU-YU 郭書毓 STUDENT (UC IRVINE) (O) 19 LOREN ZO IRVINE CA 92614 (H) LAI JOHN* 賴英政 HONEYWELL 310-512-1312 (O) [email protected] 4118 MICHELLE DR. TORRANCE CA 90503 310-542-8274 (H) LAI DANIEL (O) 7633 CARMENITA LN. WEST HILLS CA 91304 818-888-1276 (H) LAM WINSON 林文偉 TRW 310-613-3149 (O) N W 19031 S. SABRINA AVE CERRITOS CA 90703 562-402-5029 (H) LAN MING-SHONG 藍敏雄 805-373-4429 (O) N W 2841 CONEFLOWER ST THOUSAND OAKS CA 91360 805-493-4019 (H) LANG K.W. 郎果偉 818-710-6227 (O) N W 8043 CLEMENS AVE W. HILLS CA 91304 818-704-6025 (H) LAU JOSEPH* 劉亮 HONEYWELL 310-512-3255 (O) N W [email protected] 1332 VIA ROMERO PVE CA 90274 310-541-9275 (H) LEE AU * 李鸥 BOEING 562-593-5371 (O) N W [email protected] (H) LEE CHARLES L.* 李全伶 (O) Y W [email protected], 12730 PALM ST. CERRITOS CA 90703 562-926-9860 (H) LEE FRED 李世嘉 TAIWAN AEROSPACE (O) N W 2732 S. RIO LEMPA DR HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 818-961-8713 (H) LEE HUI-AN 李會安 BOEING 562-593-8006 (O) N W 17303 BABER AVE ARTESIA CA 90701 310-924-4375 (H) LEE LANSON 李蘭蓀 (O) N W HOME ADDRESS N/A 92705 (H) LEE NANCY 張海韻 BOEING 562-982-6747 (O) N W 16351 WILDFIRE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92639 (H) LEE SAMUEL 黎妙榮 BOEING 714-762-3182 (O) 28103 BRAIDWOOD DR. RPV CA 90275 310-544-7250 (H) LEE TEH HWEI 李德恢 SUPERIOR DESIGN COMPANY (O) N W 5541 IROQUOIS AVE. LAKEWOOD CA 90713 562-804-1068 (H) LEE TOM L.* 李龍富 HONEYWELL 310-512-3602 (O) Y W [email protected] 11 CHESTER IRVINE CA 92612 949-854-2290 (H) LEUNG KENNETH 梁國基 BOEING 562-593-7098 (O) [email protected] 909B W HELLMAN AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 626-758-8334 (H) LIAO HENRY 562-598-1383 (O) [email protected], P.O. Box 595 LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 562-500-7888 (H) LI MIN-CHUNG 林敏俊 KAISER COMPOSITEK 714-990-6300 (O) 8 BRISA IRVINE CA 92620 714-505-1938 (H) LI RICHARD 李欣生 RLM ASSOCIATE 714-962-3191 (O) N W 4 HARCOURT NEWOORT COAST CA 92657 (H) LIEN JOSHUA 练建亨 EATON LLC 818-409-0386 (O) W [email protected] 818 W NAOMI AVE #6 ARCADIA CA 626-294-9261 (H)
Member List - Page 5 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address LIM WAI K. 林衛國 BOEING 562-593-8589 (O) N W [email protected] 25624 AMBER LEAF RD TORRANCE CA 90505 310-325-6458 (H) LIN ALBERT Y. 林友鶴 BAE SYSTEMS 310-915-8227 (O) N W [email protected] 6215 PAT AVE. WEST HILLS CA 91307 818-347-2593 (H) LIN CHING-FANG 林清芳 AMERICAN GNC 805--582-0582 (O) [email protected], 888 EASY STREET SIMI VALLEY CA 93.065 (H) LIN CHUN-HONG 林俊宏 ALLIED IND. & ENG. CORP 818-285-9559 (O) N W 2570 MELVILLE DRIVE SAN MARINO CA 91108 818-285-0550 (H) LIN DAVID 林为 PARKER HANNIFIN 949-465-4177 (O) 8738 YOUUNGDALE ST. SAN GABRIEL CA 91775 626-673-7086 (H) W [email protected] LIN FRANK 林雨壽 HYDRO-ELECTRIC 818-843-6211 (O) N W 907 BALBOA DR ARCADIA CA 91007 818-309-5393 (H) LIN FRANK * 林峰 HONEYWELL 310-512-4208 (O) [email protected] 4134 PACIFIC COAST HWY, #114 TORRANCE CA 90505 310-791-2099 (H) [email protected] LIN JOHN 林裕民 NEW YORK LIFE 714-572-2100 (O) (ASSOCIATE MEMBER) 108 N 2ND ST APT D ALHAMBRA CA 91801 626-821-8706 (H) LIN HONG ZONG 林宏容 BOEING NORTH AMERICA 562-922-5768 (O) N W 14 BROADLEAF IRVINE CA 92612 (H) LIN Nncy 林予华 MTI, LAB 562-881-5477 (O) 17821 MARTHA PLACE CERRITOS CA 90703 (H) W [email protected] LIN PEI 林培 BOEING ROCKETDYNE 805-371-7564 (O) N W 6392 FENWORTH CT AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 818-706-2576 (H) LIN RICHARD 林渝寰 ITRI 035-917600 (O) N W BLDG 11,195 CHUNG HSING CHUTUNG, HSINCHU TWN 31015 035-711217 (H) LIN WEIYAN 林維彦 C&D ZODIAC 714-523-9977 (O) N W [email protected] 2346 BATSON AVENUE 626-825-7787 (H) LIU ANTHONY 劉昱 562-922-1016 (O) N W 2101 VIRAZON DR LA HABRA CA 90631 310-697-4493 (H) LIU CHI J. 劉啟疆 BOEING (O) N W 9892 CARRAR CIRCLE CYPRESS CA 90630 714-527-7307 (H) LIU DANKAI 劉登凱 JPL 818-393-0712 (O) N W 2222 FOOTHILL BLVD, E-172 LA CANADA CA 91011 818-352-7832 (H) LIU FRANK H.M. 劉興民 MM-WAVE TECHNOLOGY (O) N W 21328 MONTECITO ST WALNUT CA 91789 (H) LIU STEPHEN C.* 劉政平 PACIFIC CENTURY CUSTOMS SERVICE 310-670-1891 (O) Y W 3 CHUCKWAGON RD ROLLING HILLS CA 90274 310-265-1901 (H) LIU XIANMINHG 刘先明 SPACE ENVIRPNEER TECHNOWGISE 626-616-1479 (O) W [email protected] 19928 MANSEL AVE TORRANCE CA 310-317-5352 (H) LIU YUN-CHIEN 劉運傑 JENNISH INTERNATIONAL 714-528-0871 (O) N W 520 GARDENIA AVE. PLACENTIA CA 92670 714-528-0871 (H) LO ROGER 羅南平 UCLA PhD PROGRAM (O) N W 3620 TULLER AVE. L.A. CA 90034 310-391-6217 (H) LO WENSO 羅文碩 BOEING 562-593-6556 (O) N W [email protected] 9080 MCBRIDE RIVER FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 714-968-3534 (H)
Member List - Page 6 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address LU MICHELLE 陆晓程 USC (O) W [email protected] 4717 LOWELL AVE LA CRESCENTRA CA 91214 (H) LU YAW-MIN 陸耀明 RAYTHEON (O) 4814 DARIEN ST. TORRANCE CA 90503 310-860-5924 (H) LUI MITCHELL 呂文聰 C & D ZODIAC 714-891-1906 *244 (O) N W 2000 CHOCTAW DR WEST COVINA CA 91791 310-922-3239 (H) MAH WALLACE J. 馬永康 BOEING (O) N W 1901 S. POINT VIEW ST L.A. CA 90034 213-933-6490 (H) MAR NELSON* 馬在莊 AEROSPACE CORP (PART TIME) 310-336-2493 (O) Y W [email protected] 30 ANDIAMO NEWPORT COAST CA 92657 949-497-1234 (H) [email protected], MENG LIQUN 孟力群 BOEING 562-593-0389 (O) [email protected] 1642 BEECHWOOD COSTA MESA CA 92626 714-424-0139 (H) MIAO DAVID CHENG* 繆大成 JSC/NASA (O) Y W P.O. BOX 67 ALHAMBRA CA 90241 310-863-9489 (H) MIN GWO BAO 閔國寶 MINS CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 415-838-1200 (O) N W 394 PRINCETON LN DANVILLE CA 94526 415-837-5903 (H) MOH STEVEN 莫辭中 LORAL 714-770-3262 (O) N W 22545 FACINAS MISSION VIEJO CA 94526 (H) NG BEN 吳來章 BENTERY 310-541-7828 (O) N W 30512 C. PORVINER RPV CA 90274 (H) NG BING 黃昭明 A. G. EDWARDS 800-876-0353 (O) N W 1221 FLAMINIAN WAY SANTA ANA CA 92705 714-832-8311 (H) NIU MICHAEL* 牛春勻 AD AIRFRAME CONSULTING 818-993-1169 (O) Y W [email protected], 18516 MAYALL STREET ,#H NORTHRIDGE CA 91324 818-993-1169 (H) OYOUNG S. PHILIP* 歐陽小平 HONEYWELL 310-512-3604 (O) Y W [email protected] 1860 SOMERSET LN FULLERTON CA 92633 714-871-2610 (H) JIA TONY (O) W [email protected] 7842 DAISY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 714-333-8767 (H) PAI JASON 白瑜 (O) N W [email protected] 12321 REVA ST CERRITOS CA 90703 562-809-0022 (H) PAN TONY 潘建光 GE AVIATION 626-249-0695 (O) [email protected] 11 CORIENTE IRVINE CA 92614 949-302-2881 (H) W PENG WILLIAM W. 彭文昌 CAL STATE UNIV./FRESNO 209-294-2014 (O) N W 678 W. MAGILL AVE FRESNO CA 93704 209-436-0357 (H) PHO TINA 傅楚貞 TRW 310-814-8005 (O) N W 15412 CERISE AVE GARDENA CA 90249 310-644-4131 (H) SHEN FRANK C. 沈晴輝 BOEING 562-797-1225 (O) N W [email protected] 19366 E. LEGACY PL. ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748 714-595-3630 (H) SHEN FREDERICK F.* 沈方楠 (O) 13112 MOZART WAY CERRITOS CA 90703 562-483-5283 (H) [email protected] SHEN MIKE T.* 沈自元 BOEING 562-982-6139 (O) N W [email protected] 12251 SILVA PLACE CERRITOS CA 90703 562-865-9384 (H) SHEN RICK 沈毅 310-974-3313 (O) N W [email protected] 11437 HART ST ARTESIA CA 90701 562-809-9181 (H)
Member List - Page 7 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address SHENG SHIH YUNG 沈世榮 (O) N W [email protected] 10726 EQUESTRIAN DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 714-731-1224 (H) SHIAO FU K. 蕭福國 BOEING ROCKWELL 714-762-8196 (O) N W 4525 VIA DEL BUEY YORBA LINDA CA 92686 714-777-8197 (H) SHIAO SUN MING 蕭慎明 HONEYWELL 562-512-3608 (O) N W [email protected] 12519 E. SANDYCREEK LN CERRITOS CA 90703 562-926-3834 (H) SHIH CHIH-YUAN 施志遠 BOEING 562-496-6540 (O) N W 4 TEAL IRVINE CA 92714 714-551-9479 (H) SHIH DAVID WEI 施維德 BF GOODRICH 310-944-6244 (O) N W [email protected] 20420 VIA CADIZ YORBA LINDA CA 92686 714-970-5553 (H) SHU JEFFREY C.* 許志凡 HUGHES SPACE AND COMM 310-662-6040 (O) N W 13103 MOZART WAY CERRITOS CA 90703 562-926-4968 (H) SMITH WICKHAM 史偉克 WICKHAM SMITH & ASSOCIATES 949-753-3505 (O) N W 3922 ASH IRVINE CA 92714 949-552-3591 (H) SONG EDDY 桑大禮 SINO-SWEARINGEN AIRCRAFT 562-496-9543 (O) N W 1675 WEST DRIVE SAN MARINO CA 91108 818-576-2990 (H) SU PAUL J. 粟鎮宇 BOEING SPACE, HB 714-896-2147 (O) N W 18828 TETON CIRCLE FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 714-968-2292 (H) SU RICHARD 蘇昌禮 BOEING 562-593-5217 (O) N W [email protected] 1807 CHARLEMONT AVE HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 714-699-3219 (H) SUN CHUCK 孫嘉康 BOEING 562-593-5257 (O) N W [email protected] 535 MAGNOLIA AVE, #115 LONG BEACH CA 90802 626-320-2781 (H) SUN DAVID T. 孫定武 BOEING 562-593-5861 (O) N W 13861 PROCTOR AVE LA PUENTE CA 91746 818-333-7927 (H) SUN FRANK 沈懷俠 MDC (RETIRED) (O) N W 21221 SAN MIGOEL MISSION VIEJO CA 92692 714-846-5327 (H) SUN JOHN 孫強 NORTHROP 310-332-3565 (O) N W 750 LYNNMERE DR THOUSAND OAKS CA 91360 805-492-5982 (H) SUN TOM 孫祖洪 (O) N W 22909 WADE AVE TORRANCE CA 90502 310-530-3346 (H) SUNG CHING-HSIA 宋景霞 (O) N W 1322 ARBORWOOD CIRCLE CORONA CA 91720 909-279-7718 (H) SY JAYME 施建國 BOEING 562-496-8893 (O) N W [email protected] 10228 LIVEOAK AVE ARCADIA CA 91007 310-593-8740 (H) SZETO FRANK 司徒傑 BOEING 562-209-6649 (O) N W [email protected] 1881 S. FLOGD CT LA HABRA CA 90631 562-697-9832 (H) TAI DAVID W. 戴維茗 BOEING 425-266-3252 (O) N W [email protected] 27 RHODE ISLAND IRVINE CA 92606 949-733-0888 (H) TANG LI-KEN 湯力耕 BOEING 310-416-0628 (O) N W [email protected] 115 S. CORDOVA ALHAMBRA CA 91807 626-576-7795 (H) TANG PHILIP H.* 湯小屏 BOEING 562-496-6547 (O) N W [email protected], 532 W. WINNIE WAY ARCADIA CA 91007 626-574-7207 (H) TENG CALVIN 鄧中恆 NORTHROP 310-332-9452 (O) N W 957 BARTON CT ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92808 714-281-9155 (H)
Member List - Page 8 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address TENG ROCK YING* 滕穎 BOEING 562-593-0275 (O) [email protected] 30542 Rhone Dr., Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 310-543-5298 (H) [email protected], TIEU NAM TOAN 趙家強 U.A.S. ENGR CO. 818-913-1648 (O) N W 18020 E. WILLOW COURT ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748 818-709-8600 (H) TORNG TONY* 佟 儀 BOEING/RSS 714-421-2166 (O) [email protected] 20985 JADE CT. DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 909-598-7855 (H) TRAN HUNG BAN* 陈兴邦 BOEING 562-799-4933 (O) 2734 N. MEREDITH STREET ORANGE CA 92867 714-974-6579 (H) TSAY ROBERT B. 蔡伯勳 BOEING 714-372-2542 (O) N W 20008 PASEO LORENZO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 714-779-5046 (H) TSIANG T.H.* 蔣正華 SINO-SWEARINGEN AIRCRAFT 210-258-3921 (O) Y W 14207 DAYLIGHT RIDGE SAN ANTONIO TX 78230 210-561-9899 (H) TU JEFFREY 杜震宇 BOEING 562-982-9851 (O) N W 12515 WILLOW CREEK LN CERRITOS CA 90703 562-802-8905 (H) TUAN SHIN-TEH* 段心得 310-512-3589 (O) Y W 19701 VINTAGE ST CHATSWORTH CA 91311 818-993-8262 (H) TUNG LOUIS C.* 董致陽 BOEING 562-593-8603 (O) N W 19428 AMHURST CT CERRITOS CA 90703 562-924-8730 (H) TZONG GEORGE 宗才致 BOEING 562-797-2759 (O) N W [email protected] 5291 PEMBURY DR LA PALMA CA 90623 714-994-3879 (H) WAI S.K. 衛錫光 ASI INDUSTRIES 408-262-8883 (O) N W 44459 VIEW POINT CIRCLE FREEMONT CA 94539 511-226-166 (H) WAN JACK 萬建新 PRUDENTIAL SECURITY 626-810-0905 (O) 18359 E CAMINO BETLO, #C ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91708 626-810-2992 (H) WAN JUN 万军 EDS 714-952-5354 (O) (ASSOCIATE MEMBER) 12937 ARABELLA PLACE CERRITOS CA 90703 562-809-3636 (H) WANG EDWIN C.C. 王建中 BOEING 562-593-6648 (O) N W 12728 E. CHARLWOOD ST CERRITOS CA 90703 562-860-0862 (H) WANG JANE 汪健 (O) 5751 SIERRA CIELO RD IRVINE CA 92612 949-725-3168 (H) WANG RICHARD* 王道基 (O) Y W [email protected], 1907 W. 238 ST TORRANCE CA 90501 310-530-9638 (H) WANG TENNYSON 王滇聲 (O) N W 5724 SPINNAKER BAY DR LONG BEACH CA 90803 310-598-8514 (H) WEI K. H. 衛高華 (O) N W 16465 FALLEN OAK RD. HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 626-330-1526 (H) WEN KEVIN 温克文 310-812-7268 (O) N W [email protected] 3482 Lotus Street IRVINE CA 92606 949-249-1417 (H) WENG CHING C.* 翁敬忠 HONEYWELL 310-512-3610 (O) Y W 16402 HOBART LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 310-848-4094 (H) WENG DACONG 翁达聪 310-512-4778 (O) [email protected] (H) WONG GEORGE 王嵩壽 BOEING 714-372-1917 (O) N W 19405 S. SHERYL CIRCLE CERRITOS CA 90703 562-924-3861 (H)
Member List - Page 9 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address WONG HENRY 王蘅壽 (O) N W [email protected] 419 DOWNEY LN PLACENTIA CA 92870 714-996-5665 (H) WONG KENNETH 黃國鴻 PARKER HANNIFIN 714-833-3000 (O) N W 3655 PROVINCETOWN IRVINE CA 92715 714-651-8425 (H) WONG NORMAN 黃文輝 ARVAN, INC. (O) N W 28928 CRESTRIDGE RD RPV CA 90274 (H) WONG PAUL P. 王炳坤 TELEDYNE 818-717-6835 (O) N W 20352 EVERGLADES LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 310-377-7968 (H) WONG TA-HSIUNG 王遠雄 ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY 317-230-2325 (O) N W 9211 SELKIRK COURT INDIANAPOLIS IN 46260 317-844-5701 (H) WOO ROBERT 吳恩錫 BOEING 562-496-9421 (O) N W 2649 W.RUSSELL AV ANAHEIM CA 92801 714-995-7470 (H) WU BENJAMIN* 鄔錦文 (O) [email protected] 5262 BRYANT CIRCLE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 714-895-3820 (H) WU ERH-RONG 吳爾融 MEGA RESEARCH, INC. 310-541-5287 (O) N W 29711 WHITLEY CALLINS DR RPV CA 90274 310-541-5287 (H) WU HSI-YUNG 吳熙雍 BOEING 562-496-7415 (O) N W 6176 JEFFREY MARK ST. CYPRESS CA 90630 714-952-2615 (H) WU JOAN 吴光群 BOEING 206-310-9052 (O) SEATTLE WA (H) WU PETER H. 吳洵 BOEING MILITARY AIRPLANE 316-526-2351 (O) N W 1445 CEDAR PARK CIRCLE WICHITA KS 67235 316-721-4348 (H) WU SHU-LIANG BOB 吳叔梁 ALL STAR ENGINEERING 818-288-3809 (O) N W 5344 PONDOSA AVE SAN GABRIEL CA 91778 818-795-3518 (H) XIE KANG 謝康 (O) 144 ARDMORE DR. SAN GABRIEL CA 91775 626-299-1273 (H) XU VERA FU (O) 6919 Maycroft Dr Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 (H) YAM ALIVIN 任兆麟 WESTMOUNT ACCET MGMT 626-463-7366 (O) N W [email protected] ASSOCIATE MEMBER 70 SOUTH LAKE AVE, STE 1000 PASADENA CA 91101 (H) YANG ERIC* 陽道華 BOEING 562-593-8008 (O) N W [email protected] 18 Hilltop Circle Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 310-378-6232 (H) [email protected], YANG JESSERSON YS 楊源生 ASIAN PACIFIC FELL CELL TECH. 714-630-9669 (O) N W 7217 DAPPLE CIR ORANGE CA 92669 714-639-3597 (H) YANG MICHAEL S.* 楊孫均 HONEYWELL 310-920-2269 (C) Y W [email protected] 3815 Via Palomino, Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 310-378-2510 (H) [email protected] YANG STEVEN 杨少宁 BOEING 425-266-7914 (O) W SEATTLE WA (H) YANG T.T. 楊添才 ROCKETDYNE 818-586-3154 (O) N W 728 S. BRISTOL AVE. LA CA 90049 310-829-7471 (H) YEH DAVID T. 葉定葳 BOEING 714-896-1261 (O) N W 12534 INGLENOOK LANE CERRITOS CA 90703 310-865-3208 (H) YEH HARRY C. 葉洪江 310-541-9476 (O) N W 7024 HEDGEWOOD DR RPV CA 90274 310-377-1988 (H)
Member List - Page 10 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address YEH TE FUNG 葉德風 ALLIED-SIGNAL (RETIRED) (O) N W 3811 FUCHSIA CIRCLE SEAL BEACH CA 90746 310-598-1100 (H) YEN ANNA 嚴安娜 NORTHROP 310-942-5392 (O) N W 1521 23RD ST. MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 310-545-7603 (H) YING BENEDICT 應愛義 HONEYWELL 310-512-4084 (O) N W 1017 PARK CIRCLE DR TORRANCE CA 90502 310-534-3615 (H) YU MICHAEL 喻柯铭 BOEING 562-593-0538 (O) N W [email protected] 8441 Benjamin Dr HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 714-394-0168 (C) YONG KAY* 戎凱 (O) N W 26 DECENTE IRVINE CA 92714 714-975-1236 (H) YOUNG KENNY C. 楊欽凱 UNITED AIRLINE (O) N W 3218 E. ALMOND AVE ORANGE CA 92669 714-997-5430 (H) YU ERIC (O) [email protected] ASSOCIATE MEMBER 1016 W. STADIUM AVE, W. LAFAYETTE in 47906 626-329-3289 (H) YU JIA* 余嘉 GOODRICH 619-691-4087 (O) GOODRICH CO. 850 LAGOON DR MZ107P CHULA VISTA CA 91910 858-259-6758 (H) YU SEAN* 余崇孝 MORGAN STANLEY 626-446-6656 (H) 166 CALIFORNIA ST., #D ARCADIA CA 91006 213-553-3508 (O) YUAN KUO-AN 阮國安 BOEING 714-896-5969 (O) [email protected] 12512 FALLCREEK LANE CERRITOS CA 90703 562-926-8529 (H) YUAN PAO LIN* 袁保麟 BOEING 562-593-5332 (O) N W [email protected] 5093 MELBOURNE DRIVE CYPRESS CA 90630 714-826-8348 (H) ZHANG LI 张丽 BOEING 562-384-4209 (O) [email protected] 9008 STANFORD WAY BUENA PARK CA 90620 714-761-5398 (H) ZHENG DAGUANG * 郑大光 HONEYWELL 310-512-1613 (O) N W [email protected] 20005 MANSEL AVE TORRANCE CA 310-339-6491 (H) ZHENG SHIRLEY NORTHROP GRUMMAN 310-331-5399 (O) W [email protected] 7842 DAISY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 714-326-9435 (H) ZIEN TSE-FOU 錢致福 (O) N W 3300 BERET LANE WHEATON MD 20906 301-871-8226 (H) CHANG DAVE 張崇鈺 BOEING 253-639-1068 (O) 11631 SE 225TH St KENT WA 98031 (H) [email protected] CHANG FRANK 張復生 BOEING 425-234-1402 (O) 8435 135TH AVE NEWCASTLE WA 98027 (H) [email protected] CHANG NORMAN 張士昌 BOEING 425-641-6187 (O) 13714 SE 43NDST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] CHANG WILLIAM N. K. 張乃光 BOEING 425-641-1593 (O) 70 SKAGIT KEY BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) CHAO TAO-YANG 趙道楊 BOEING 425-271-2921 (O) 18701 136TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 (H) [email protected] CHEE TONY 朱煥棟 BOEING 425-885-9259 (O) 13028 NE 32ND PL BELLEVUE WA 98005 (H) CHEN ALLEN 陳文新 BOEING 425-747-3069 (O) 13905 SE 42ND ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected]
Member List - Page 11 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address CHEN CHI-CHING 陳繼勤 BOEING 206-523-0482 (O) 3903 NE 103RD ST SEATTLE WA 98125 (H) [email protected] CHEN C.H. 陳建豪 UW 206-729-5403 (O) 5030 40TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) [email protected] CHEN JIM J. C. 陳錦江 BOEING 425-885-7322 (O) 7519 144TH AVE NE REDMOND WA 98052 (H) [email protected] CHEN K. CHESTER 陳國經 BOEING 206-364-7571 (O) 1231 NW 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98177 (H) [email protected] CHEN PAUL 陳國邦 BOEING 425-747-7116 (O) 1845 179TH PL NE BELLEVUE WA 98008 (H) [email protected] CHEN PINCHUNG 陳秉中 BOEING (O) 15472 SE FAIRWOOD RENTON WA 98058 (H) [email protected] CHENG AARON 鄭瑞山 BOEING 253-630-7620 (O) 13817 SE 274TH ST KENT WA 98042 (H) [email protected] CHENG DAVID 鄭資弘 BOEING 425-641-9334 (O) 14121 SE 61ST PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] CHI ALLEN 季偉剛 BOEING 425-643-0747 (O) 14009 SE 60TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] CHI WILLIAM K. 戚偉國 STARBUCK 425-868-8280 (O) 23036 NE 29TH AVE Redmond WA 98053 (H) CHIEN CHIH-HSING 簡志行 BOEING 425-746-4400 (O) 18302 NW MONTREUZ ISSAQUAH WA 98027 (H) CHIEN CHUNG-PING 簡中平 BOEING 425-868-4086 (O) 2204 220TH PL NE REDMOND WA 98053 (H) CHIEN ERIC 簡百慶 UW 206-526-9878 (O) 5030 40TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) [email protected] CHOU SHU C. 周車英 BOEING 425-277-0109 (O) 15752 SE 166TH PL RENTON WA 98058 (H) [email protected] DAI JASON 戴翠 SIE 425-290-7702 (O) 10630 PL WEST MUKILTEO WA 98275 (H) [email protected] DU J. 杜家吉 UW 425-349-3856 (O) 6503 19TH AVE NW #3 SEATTLE WA 98117 (H) [email protected] FENG ANDREW 馮德宇 UW 425-881-6273 (O) 15223 NE 72ND ST REDMOND WA 98052 (H) [email protected] FUNG CASEY K. 馮健詞 BOEING 253-630-5664 (O) 12616 SE 222ND PL KENT WA 98031 (H) [email protected] FUNG KENNY 馮勵強 BOEING 206-745-6435 (O) 16819 69TH PL W LYNNWOOD WA 98037 (H) [email protected] FU LUKE C. 傅樨賢 BOEING 425-868-1948 (O) 4520 191ST PL NE REDMOND WA 98053 (H) [email protected] GOO ABRAHAM BOEING 253-631-5916 (O) 18909 SE 282ND CT KENT WA 98042 (H) HO LYDIA S. 許肅雍 BOEING 425-562-1761 (O) 14842 SE 65TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected]
Member List - Page 12 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address HONG C.S. 洪志賢 425-881-2198 (O) 14145 NE 32ND PL BELLEVUE WA 98007 (H) [email protected] HSING HSU Y. 幸旭陽 BOEING 425-313-1888 (O) 635 NW DATEWOOD DR ISSAQUAH WA 98027 (H) [email protected] HSU OLIVER 徐一宸 BOEING 425-649-9688 (O) 4615 140TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] HSUEH ROBERT 薛祖同 206-236-9913 (O) 4020 91ST AVE SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 (H) HSY HOWARD 許希哲 BOEING 425-747-2427 (O) 5909 138TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] HUANG JOSEPH 黃苗林 BOEING 425-747-4061 (O) 2034 154TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98007 (H) [email protected] JOU WEN-HUEI 周文輝 BOEING 425-641-9242 (O) 4745 146TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] KOH BONG-LUNG 柯邦龍 BOEING 425-747-8998 (O) 5114 127TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) KUO STANLEY 郭譽先 BUSINESS 425-232-2159 (O) 7929 SE 37TH ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 (H) [email protected] LANG DE-YU 郎德渝 BOEING 425-747-0916 (O) 13715 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] LAU RAYMOND 劉乃華 BOEING 425-747-5811 (O) 17625 SE 45TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] LEE CHAN 李乾銘 MATSUSHITA 425-290-3754 (O) 12430 SZND PLACE W. MUKILTEO WA 98275 (H) [email protected] LEE R YAN 李承峻 UW 206-634-1786 (O) 5030 40TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) [email protected] LEE SHIANG-YU 李湘渝 BOEING 206-368-0748 (O) 4607 NE 203ND CT SEATTLE WA 98155 (H) [email protected] LEE STEPHEN T. 李東雄 BOEING 425-869-8082 (O) 3590 169TH AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98008 (H) [email protected] LEONG KHEAN N. 梁健元 BOEING 425-747-9826 (O) 15921 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) LI CHARLIE 李國琛 BOEING 425-649-8790 (O) 13615 SE 56TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] LI HSIUNG 李熊渭 BOEING 253-850-8079 (O) 10922 SE 211 PL #825 KENT WA 98031 (H) [email protected] LI WEI 李衛 TORAY 253-445-4160 (O) 19002 SOUTH AVE E. TACOMA wa 98446 (H) [email protected] LIN ANDY 林俊次 425-562-8965 (O) 4560 SOMERSET PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98008 (H) [email protected] LIN DON 林棟樑 BOEING 425-747-1749 (O) 15033 SE 64TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] LIN KUEN Y. 林坤源 UW 425-643-6050 (O) 12976 SE 23RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98005 (H) [email protected]
Member List - Page 13 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address LING CALVIN Y.L. 林永龍 BOEING 425-643-4670 (O) 14816 SE 58TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] LU ROBERTO 魯異 BOEING 253-859-2032 (O) 11720 SE 256TH PL KENT WA 98031 (H) [email protected] MIAO EDWARD C. 繆志毅 EOSPACE 206-522-8716 (O) 10009 44TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98125 (H) [email protected] NEE JOSEPH 倪祖麟 BOEING 425-957-7595 (O) 4650 151ST CT SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] PENG JACK 彭之光 BOEING 253-351-0465 (O) 3502 LILAC ST. SE AUBURN WA 98092 (H) [email protected] SHEN MICHAEL 盛強深 BOEING 425-747-2509 (O) 13223 SE 49TH BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) SHEN I.Y. STEVE 沈一羽 UW (O) 4134 42ND AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) SU MICHAEL 蘇文顯 BOEING 425-885-9214 (O) 13110 NE 33RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98005 (H) [email protected] SUEN DAVID 孫大偉 BOEING 425-641-8648 (O) 16911 SE 45TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) TIEN CHANG-CHIO 田長焯 BOEING 206-523-4984 (O) 5021 45TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 (H) TUAN YEN 段 燕 BOEING 425-822-4946 (O) 11643 NE 102ND PL KIRKLAND WA 98033 (H) WANG DAVID S. 王士穎 BOEING (O) 16305 22ND DR SE MILL CREEK WA 98012 (H) [email protected] WAN EDMUND 溫耀宗 BOEING 206-242-0938 (O) 572 S 158TH ST SEATTLE WA 98148 (H) [email protected] WANG ROBERT C.H. 王慶煇 VITESSA 425-867-9359 (O) 4207 170TH CT NE REDMOND WA 98052 (H) [email protected] WONG FRED 王松華 BOEING 425-641-7475 (O) 14007 SE 49TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] WONG RAYMOND W. 黃偉斌 BOEING 253-854-9182 (O) 20411 105TH PL SE KENT WA 98031 (H) [email protected] WONG WAI S. 黃惠信 BOEING 206-722-2860 (O) 5005 29TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98108 (H) [email protected] WOON FRANK PRIME 206-722-4615 (O) 8508 S 112TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 (H) WU KEMING 吳克明 BOEING 425-747-5127 (O) 13911 SE 42ND ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] YANG YUANJIE 楊元杰 BOEING 425-337-9332 (O) 13917 23RD AVE SE BOTHELL WA 98032 (H) [email protected] YEN MIKE 顏希平 BOEING 425-228-0647 (O) 8403 129TH PL SE RENTON WA 98056 (H) [email protected] YEUNG TED 楊德華 BOEING 425-235-0599 (O) 15212 SE 179TH ST RENTON WA 98058 (H) [email protected]
Member List - Page 14 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address YEH DAVE M.H. 葉明學 JAMCO 425-742-9153 (O) 11918 59TH AVE MUKILTEO WA 98208 (H) YEH YING CHIN 葉應欽 BOEING 425-865-9480 (O) 1829 173RD AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98008 (H) [email protected] YOUNG SIMON 楊毓芬 BOEING 253-874-3691 (O) 31003 39TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 (H) [email protected] YU NENG JONG 余能忠 BOEING 425-641-9236 (O) 5707 149TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] YU RUBIN 禹如斌 425-746-6264 (O) 13822 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 (H) [email protected] ZHANG DAWEI 張大為 IBM 425-366-0504 (O) 3711 164TH ST SW LYNNWOOD WA 98037 (H) [email protected] CHANG KAR 張 家 彪 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-763-2446 (O) 7107 BLACKBERRY ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-572-7066 (H) CHEN SHERMAN 陳新民 ELECTROSPACE (O) 2672 PRIMROSE DR. RICHARDSON TX 75082 214-644-8154 (H) CHUANG S.Y. 莊樹源 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-777-3776 (O) 1905 SAN JACINTO ARLINGTON TX 76012 817-277-9224 (H) FENG BRUCE 馮克勤 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-763-3279 (O) 6502 GREENSPRING DR. ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-478-8655 (H) FENG SHIANG 馮祥雲 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP. 817-762-8654 (O) 3402 FOX MEADOWS DRIVE COLLEYVILLE TX 76034 817-571-6670 (H) HOU JERRY 侯國雄 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-763-2345 (O) 1911 ROCKBROOK ARLINGTON TX 76006 817-277-5049 (H) HSU HAI-WEI 徐海偉 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-5474 (O) 2112 REVERCHON DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76017 817-465-4845 (H) JEA LI-CHUNG 賈立強 LORAL 214-266-0250 (O) 336 CLAYTON STREET GRAND PRAIR TX 75052 214-264-4607 (H) KUO TIM 郭盈廷 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-777-2156 (O) 3709 LAUREL LANE BEDFORD TX 76021 817-571-4963 (H) LEE EDWARD W.Y. 李維岳 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-2942 (O) 2105 STONEHILL COURT ARLINGTON TX 76012 817-277-2729 (H) LEE OWEN H. 李鴻文 BOEING AEROSPACE & ELECTRO 817-497-6709 (O) 4012 OAK MEADOW DR. PLANO TX 76093 214-403-9456 (H) LEE TING-WHAI 李庭槐 MENASCO AEROSYSTEMS 817-283-4471 (O) 2516 WILD ROSE COURT ARLINGTON TX 76006 817-640-0570 (H) LIN SHERMAN 林紹文 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-6237 (O) 4010 RAMSGATE COURT COLLEYVILLE TX 76034 817-545-3784 (H) PAN ALFRED 潘宗達 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-4033 (O) P.O. BOX 701 HURST TX 76053 817-545-7624 (H)
Member List - Page 15 會 員 通 訊 錄 ChineseNam Company Name Home or Last Name First Name City State Zip Phone E-mail e Mailing Address SHIH PEN-YUAN 施本源 LTV, MISSILE DIVISION 214-266-0161 (O) 6502 FORESTVIEW DR. ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-478-3175 (H) TZENG C. S. 曾喬松 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-3350 (O) 2111 NEWBURY DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76014 817-467-0211 (H)
WANG BO-PING 王波平 UNIV. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON 817-272-2021 (O) 6609 CANALVIEW DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-478-8238 (H) WANG CHEN-AN 王鎮安 MENASCO 817-267-3551 (O) 1016 CLEMSON DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76012 817-795-1789 (H) WANG JOHN C. 王慶頤 BELL HELICOPTER 817-280-5070 (O) 2004 LAKE COUNTRY DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76012 817-274-7904 (H) WANG PHONE-NAN 王芳男 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP. 817-762-8762 (O) 3801 DANBRY ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-496-0953 (H) WEI PAUL 魏英佶 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-762-0231 (O) 7956 MORNING LANE FORT WORTH TX 76123 817-294-9955 (H) WU JAMES 吳雲華 LTV, MISSILE DIVISION 214-266-1180 (O) 2204 COPPER RIDGE RD. ARLINGTON TX 76006 817-640-8912 (H) WU PEILI 虞培麗 LOCKHEED MARTIN 817-935-1117 (O) 3108 REGAL DRIVE ARLINGTON TX 76016 817-496-3107 (H) YUAN JAMES J. 袁拯民 ASSOCIATED AIR CENTER 214-350-4111 (O) 3536 MEADOWSIDE DRIVE BEDFORD TX 76021 817-354-4777 (H)
* AND BOLD ARE LIFE TIME MEMBERS
Member List - Page 16