DOCSLIB.ORG

ILJ 2021 Materials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The International Law Journal, the Leitner Center for International Law and Justice and the Center on Race, Law and Justice presents Black Lives Matter Around the Globe: A Symposium Focused on Racial and Ethnic Discrimination Abroad February 12, 2021 10 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. EDT Zoom Webinar CLE COURSE MATERIALS Table of Contents - http://jkhome.nic.in/psa0001.pdf 1. Speaker Biographies (view in document) [REPORT] Amnesty International Report - Armed Forces Special Powers Act 2. CLE Materials - https://www.amnesty.org/download/Docu ments/12000/asa200422013en.pdf Panel 1 #KashmiriLivesMatter: A Discussion about the Ongoing Conflict in Kashmir [REPORT] OHCHR Report - Developments in UAPA, 1967 - Kashmir https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/A Countries/IN/DevelopmentsInKashmirJune 1967-37.pdf 2016ToAp ril2018.pdf UAPA Amendment 2019 - http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/ [REPORT] OHCHR Report - UN experts 210355.pdf call for urgent action to remedy "alarming" human rights Armed Forces (Jammu & Kashmir) Special situation https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEv Powers Act, 1990 - ents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=26 https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/T 148 he%20Armed%20Forces%20%28Jammu% 20and%20Kashmir%29%20Special%20Po wers%20Act%2C%201990_0.pdf Panel 2: Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Africa Public Safety Act - [ARTICLE] ConCourt Brings Relief to Children http://jkhome.nic.in/psa0001.pdf Born in South Africa to Foreign Parents - https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south- Human Rights: africa/2020-02-27-concourt-brings-relief-to- https://www.amnesty.org/download/Docum children-born-in-sa-to-foreign-parents/ ents/12000/asa200422013en.pdf [ARTICLE] Ensuring All Lives Matter in South https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countrie Africa - Toward Freedom s/IN/DevelopmentsInKashmirJune2016ToA - https://towardfreedom.org/story/ensuring-all- pril2018.pdf black-lives-matter-in-south-africa/ [CONSTITUTION] - Excerpt of Bill of Rights https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pag and Chapter 14 of Kenyan Constitution es/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=26148 - http://www.kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ actview.xql?actid=Const2010 [Law] UAPA, 1967 - https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/ [ARTICLE] - Black American and Kenyan Lives A1967-37.pdf Matter - https://www.the-star.co.ke/siasa/2020- 06-13-black-american-and-kenyan-lives-matter/ [Law] UAPA Amendment 2019 - http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019 [LEGAL RULING] - Chisuse and Others v /210355.pdf Director-General, Department of Home Affairs and Another [2020] ZACC 20 - https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/h [Law] Armed Forces (Jammu & andle/20.500.12144/36628/Judgment%20CCT Kashmir) Special Powers Act, %20155- 1990 https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/fi 19%20Chisuse%20and%20Others%20v%20Di les/The%20Armed%20Forces%20%28Jam rector- mu% 20and%20Kashmir%29%20Special% General%2c%20Department%20....pdf?seque 20Powers%20Act%2C%201990_0.pdf nce=47&isAllowed=y [Law] Public Safety Act Panel 3: Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Europe Black Lives and German Exceptionalism Citizens of Nowhere [ARTICLE] - Black Lives Matter and German Exceptionalism - https://verfassungsblog.de/black-lives- and-german- exceptionalism/#:~:text=The%20killings%2 0of%20George%20Floyd,movement%20ha s%20come%20into%20being. [ARTICLE] - Citizens of Nowhere? Fear, Race, Migration, and the Dangers of Formalism - https://www.juwiss.de/84- 2016/ [CASE LAW] - DeGraffenreid v. General Motors Assembly Division St. Louis - https://www.westlaw.com/Document/I125 961b4910211d98e8fb00d6c6a02dd/View/F ullText.html?transitionType=Default&conte xtData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 [CASE LAW] - Korematsu v. United States - https://www.westlaw.com/Document/Id4c 846ac9c1d11d991d0cc6b54f12d4d/View/F ullText.html?transitionType=Default&conte xtData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 Bios for ILJ Spring Symposium CLE Packet Panel 1 Sehla Ashai Sehla Ashai is a Kashmiri American attorney and human rights activist, with a special focus on immigration, racial/religious discrimination, and women's rights. A graduate of Johns Hopkins University and University of Michigan Law School, Ms. Ashai received the Henry Bates and Clara Belfield Fellowship from University of Michigan Law School in 2005 to study the state subjects law of Kashmir and presented her findings at the Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting Session on Law and South Asian Studies. After law school, Sehla has worked as a federal judicial law clerk, a legal aid attorney, a human rights program consultant (domestically and internationally), and the director of immigration litigation for a nonprofit focused on serving the Muslim community. Currently, she is adjunct professor of law at the Texas A&M University Law School’s Immigrant Rights Clinic. Arjun Sethi Arjun Singh Sethi is a human rights lawyer, professor, author, and community activist based in Washington, DC. He works closely with Muslim, Arab, South Asian and Sikh communities, and holds faculty appointments at Georgetown University Law Center and Vanderbilt University Law School. In the wake of the 2016 election, Arjun traveled the country and met with a diversity of people to document the hate they experienced during the campaign and after inauguration. American Hate: Survivors Speak Out was released in August 2018 and named an NPR Best Book of the Year. Arjun also serves as Co-Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security, Terrorism & Treatment of Enemy Combatants at the American Bar Association and has served as a legal observer across the world, including military commissions at Guantanamo Bay. Mrinal Sharma Mrinal is a human rights lawyer and researcher who works with unlawfully detained human rights defenders, asylum seekers, refugees and stateless persons in South Asia. She completed her L.L.B. from the University of Delhi in 2013 and earned her L.L.M. in International Law and Justice from Fordham University of Law in 2018 where she was also a Dean's Scholar. Most recently, she worked as a Policy Advisor with Amnesty International India until the organisation was forced to shut down by the Government of India. At Amnesty, Mrinal's work focused on arbitrary deprivation of nationality in Assam, hindered access to justice in Kashmir and demonisation of minorities in India. Previously, she has worked with the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative and Refugee Solidarity Network. Her work has been published in various news dailies and the annual journal of the Indian National Human Rights Commission. Panel 2 Kofi Abotsi Dr. Kofi Abotsi is the Dean of the UPSA Law School. Prior to his assumption of post, he was the immediate past Dean of the GIMPA Law School, a position he held between for six (6) years 2012 and 2018. As a practicing lawyer, Dean Abotsi has a 19-year standing at the Bar and has played an active role in the administrative life of the Ghanaian Bar. Dean Abotsi has also held various public service positions, including serving on Constitutional Commissions and consulting for governmental and inter-governmental agencies and bodies including the IMF. In addition to the above, Dean Abotsi has served on a number of boards and advisory councils and played pivotal roles in shaping the policy direction of corporate entities in Ghana, including presently chairing the advisory board of the Chief Executives Officers (CEO) Network of Ghana, (a body comprising the CEOs of some of the largest and notable corporations in Ghana). Dean Abotsi holds a bachelor of Laws Degree and Barrister-at-Law Certificate from the University of Ghana and the Ghana School of Law respectively, a Master of Laws Degree from the Harvard Law School and a doctoral degree in constitutional law from the University of Milan. He is equally widely consulted in academia and has been a visiting scholar and guest lecturer in leading European and American universities including Oxford University in the United Kingdom, Fordham Law School and Indiana Law School, in the United States, and the Universities in Italy. Dean Abotsi has written extensively in leading peer review journals of law in the world in various areas of law but largely concentrated in constitutional and corporate law. He is a member of charitable organizations and professional bodies including the Ghana Bar Association and rotary international. He is also a fellow of the Institute of Directors, Ghana. Willy Mutunga Willy Mutunga was Kenya’s 14th Chief Justice since independence and first President of the Supreme Court under the 2010 Constitution. He served in that capacity from 2011 to 2016. Recently he has served as consultant with the Constitution Review Commission of The Gambia; Secretary General of the Commonwealth special envoy to the Maldives; and a distinguished scholar-in-residence at Fordham Law’s Leitner Center for international Law and Justice School. Justice Mutunga studied law in the University of Dar es Salaam (LLB. LL.M) and Osgoode Hall Law School, University of York, Toronto (D.Jur). He is Senior Counsel of the Kenyan Bar. Justice Mutunga played a pivotal role in the constitution-making processes in Kenya from the 1970s and particularly, from the early 1990s. He worked on the implementation of the progressive 2010 Kenyan Constitution as head of the Judiciary and President of the apex court in the country. He advocated, in his writings and judgments, for the development of indigenous, robust, patriotic, decolonized, de- imperialized, pro-people, progressive, gender just, non-racist, non-ethnic, and transformative jurisprudence that is not insular and does not pay unthinking deference to other jurisdictions, regardless of how prominent they may be. He has also advocated for a progressive jurisprudence for Africa and the global south as part of the significant contribution in the struggle for a new just, peaceful, non-militaristic, ecologically safe, prosperous, egalitarian, and equitable socialist world. During his tenure as Chief Justice, Mutunga sought to lay permanent and indestructible foundations for a transformed judiciary. Under the blueprint of the Kenyan Judiciary Transformation Framework 2012- 2016, he achieved impressive progress in bringing the justice system closer to the ordinary people.
Recommended publications
  • The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK

    The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK

    2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith’s mix of formal and informal training is second to none. It enables those coming fresh from law school to quickly become familiar with complex concepts and provides them with the necessary tools to throw themselves into their team’s work right from the start. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Contents Law school The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) p.37 An introduction to the SQE with ULaw p.41 Solicitors’ timetable p.43 Barristers’ timetable p.44 The Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) p.45 The Legal Practice Course (LPC) p.49 The Bar Course p.52 How to fund law school p.55 Law school course providers p.57 Contents https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) From 2021 there’s going to be an entirely new way of qualifying as a solicitor replacing the GDL, LPC and training contract. If you’re thinking ‘SQE OMG!’ – don’t fear: here’s a quick guide. What’s going on? volve a practical testing ‘pilot’ with students. The regula- In winter 2016/17 the Solicitors Regulation Authority tor has stated that it expects various other providers (i.e. (SRA) dropped a bombshell on the legal profession: it was probably law schools and the current GDL/LPC providers) going ahead with its plan for the Solicitors Qualifying Ex- to offer preparatory courses for both stages of the SQE.
  • CVE and Constitutionality in the Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens the Equal Protection Rights of American Muslims in Minneapolis-St

    CVE and Constitutionality in the Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens the Equal Protection Rights of American Muslims in Minneapolis-St

    American University Law Review Volume 69 Issue 6 Article 6 2020 CVE and Constitutionality in the Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens the Equal Protection Rights of American Muslims in Minneapolis-St. Paul Sarah Chaney Reichenbach American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Reichenbach, Sarah Chaney (2020) "CVE and Constitutionality in the Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens the Equal Protection Rights of American Muslims in Minneapolis-St. Paul," American University Law Review: Vol. 69 : Iss. 6 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol69/iss6/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CVE and Constitutionality in the Twin Cities: How Countering Violent Extremism Threatens the Equal Protection Rights of American Muslims in Minneapolis-St. Paul Abstract In 2011, President Barack Obama announced a national strategy for countering violent extremism (CVE) to attempt to prevent the “radicalization” of potential violent extremists. The Obama Administration intended the strategy to employ a community-based approach, bringing together the government, law enforcement, and local communities for CVE efforts.
  • Manchester Floor Plan Manchester Exhibitors 2020

    Manchester Floor Plan Manchester Exhibitors 2020

    MANCHESTER EXHIBITORS 2020 MANCHESTER University of Aberdeen 1 Cardiff Metropolitan University 33 University of Leicester 82 University of Southampton 135 University of Wolverhampton 148 HIGHER EDUCATION Abertay University 2 University of Central Lancashire 34 University of Lincoln 80 Solent University (Southampton) 136 University of Winchester 160 EXHIBITION Aberystwyth University 5 Royal Central School of Speech and Drama 95 University of Liverpool 88 University of St Andrews 137 University of Worcester 161 The Academy of Contemporary Music 3 University of Chester 35 Liverpool Hope University 79 SGS College 139 University of York 162 3 – 4 MARCH 2020 Anglia Ruskin University 4 City, University of London 121 Staffordshire University 138 83 163 Arden University 6 Coventry University 36 University of Stirling 140 Aston University 7 University for the Creative Arts 40 LMA 91 University of Strathclyde 142 Bangor University 9 University of Cumbria 39 London Metropolitan University 81 University of Suffolk 141 Supported by Barnsley College 8 De MontFort University 38 London School of Economics University of Sunderland 143 CAREER AND APPRENTICESHIP 97 and Political Science University of Bath 10 University of Surrey 144 British Army H 89 Loughborough University 84 Bath Spa University 11 University of Sussex 146 Microsoft C UCEN Manchester 92 University of Bedfordshire 12 Swansea University 149 National Apprenticeship Service A University of Derby 41 The University of Manchester 85 In association with Birmingham City University 14 Teesside University
  • What Do Imperial Materials Graduates Do?

    What Do Imperial Materials Graduates Do?

    What do Imperial Materials graduates do? There were 27 known destinations of the 2017 graduates (Home & EU students) Graph 1 – Destinations of 2017 graduates Number of responses Percentage Entered Employment 12 44.45% Entered Further Study/Training 11 40.75% Seeking Employment 1 3.7% Not Available for Employment/Study/Training 3 11.1% Graph 2 – Comparison with previous years 2014 2015 2016 2017 Entered Employment 27% 61% 42% 44.45% Entered Further Study/Training 50% 28% 35% 40.75% Seeking Employment 6% 11% 11% 3.7% Not Available for Employment/Study/Training 17% 0% 12% 11.1% Graph 3 – Sector of employment entered 2014 2015 2016 2017 Agriculture 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Oil/Mining 20.0% 0.0% 18.18% 0% Manufacture 20.0% 0.0% 18.18% 8.35% Utilities & Transport 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Technical Consultancy/R&D 0.0% 29.4% 0.0% 8.35% IT & Telecommunications 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Banking/Financial 20.0% 11.8% 9.09% 8.35% Accountancy 0.0% 5.9% 9.09% 16.65% Business & Management Consultancy 0.0% 5.9% 9.09% 16.65% Other Business Activities 20.0% 41.1% 9.09% 25% Public Administration/Defence 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Education 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 16.65% Health/Social Work 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0% Others 20.0% 0.0% 27.27% 0% Careers Service www.imperial.ac.uk/careers Examples of employers and occupations for Materials graduates who entered employment Examples of Employers Examples of Occupations • Accenture • Business Analyst • Barclays PLC • Treasury Analyst • Brafe Engineering • Engineer • EY • Management Consultant • Imperial College London • Research Assistant • Kene Partners • Assistant Consultant • RSM - Corporate Finance • Analyst • Signature Flight Support • Management Accountant • Wyman Gordon Ltd.
  • Experts Weigh in on Designating the Muslim Brotherhood As a Foreign Terrorist Organization

    Experts Weigh in on Designating the Muslim Brotherhood As a Foreign Terrorist Organization

    Experts Weigh In on Designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization February 2017 “I think it would be an incredibly stupid thing to do, the top reason being that it’s not a terrorist group.” Daniel Benjamin, former Ambassador-at-Large and Coordinator for Counterterrorism, U.S. State Department (Politico) “If credible evidence of terrorist activity is not forthcoming, it would quite simply be illegal for the United States to designate the Brotherhood on purely ideological grounds. To be sure, the Egyptian Brotherhood pursues an illiberal agenda in a democratic framework, but that is not a lawless act. Criminalizing the group for a set of ideas, by contrast, would be a lawless act.” William McCants, Senior Fellow, Center for Middle East Policy and Director, Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World and Benjamin Wittes, Senior Fellow in Governance Studies (Brookings Institution) “What you have is a disparate network of groups that may or may not meet criteria […] It’s trying to hit a grand slam and it’s probably going to lead to a strikeout.” Jonathan Schanzer, former Treasury Department analyst; Vice President for Research, Foundation for Defense of Democracies (Politico) There is no “evidence that senior Muslim Brotherhood leaders have ordered or condoned [recent violent acts], or that the Brotherhood has carried out any of the major terrorist attacks that have wracked [Egypt].” Designating the Brotherhood as an FTO would, in effect, “[force] its leaders in that direction [of terror] because all other political and legal avenues will be closed to them.” Michele Dunne, Senior Associate and Director of Middle East Program and Nathan Brown, Nonresident Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace “A U.S.
  • (Alternative Providers) of the University of Law October 2017

    (Alternative Providers) of the University of Law October 2017

    Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) of The University of Law October 2017 Contents About this review ..................................................................................................... 1 Key findings .............................................................................................................. 2 Judgements .......................................................................................................................... 2 Good practice ....................................................................................................................... 2 Affirmation of action being taken ........................................................................................... 2 About the provider ................................................................................................... 3 Explanation of findings ............................................................................................ 5 1 Judgement: The setting and maintenance of the academic standards of awards ........... 5 2 Judgement: The quality of student learning opportunities ............................................. 15 3 Judgement: The quality of the information about learning opportunities ....................... 38 4 Judgement: The enhancement of student learning opportunities .................................. 41 Glossary .................................................................................................................. 45 The University of Law About this review This is a
  • Law at Edinburgh University Entry Requirements

    Law at Edinburgh University Entry Requirements

    Law At Edinburgh University Entry Requirements All-inclusive Freeman postponing very hollowly while Cyril remains fringilline and nude. Mass-produced Hermann dissimulate mumblingly or overmans servilely when Hamil is Servian. Tressy Lay peculating some prelacies and chloridized his redfishes so filchingly! Entry requirements regarding undergraduate program taught about yourself to get on, at edinburgh law university or alert you are important connections How much aid a solicitor cost Unbiased. 255 Application Fee Admission Requirements Required Transcript of sufficient school. Legal Internships Undergraduate Graduate with Law Students Application Deadlines. Study well in the UK USA or Australia with a university pathway course or apply in direct entry to high of our leading university partners. The University of Law fully complies with equal opportunities legislation and actively. Edinburgh Law early The University of Edinburgh All Locations. Alonso Rael de Aguilar Entry into the Pueblos of Cochiti and San. Law LLB Hons at University of Edinburgh. How to enlighten to an International University in the UK in 2021. Ucl arts and sciences entry requirements. For example applicants for someone law degree must be required to leap four. Of the Weekly Law Reports entry and the Encyclopedia of frog are in cape case. You will study four compulsory Entry Requirements Hello. Which universities are the easiest to behavior into glass the Student. Students with a premium plan to edinburgh entry requirements. The working of Edinburgh Award Understanding Industry vessel or General Studies will. Chat with tutors students our pro bono team Admissions Student Finance. UCAS Code NM52 Ranked 3rd in the UK for Marketing top 10 for any Complete University Guide 2021 Second-year entry may deem available to suitably-.
  • International Refugee Assistance Project ("IRAP") V. Trump

    International Refugee Assistance Project ("IRAP") V. Trump

    Appeal: 17-1351 Doc: 196-1 Filed: 04/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 30 No. 17-1351 IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ________________________ INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED METEAB; PAUL HARRISON; IBRAHIM AHMED MOHOMED; JOHN DOES #1 & 3; JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the U.S.; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; DANIEL R. COATS, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence, Defendants – Appellants. ________________________ On Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland (8:17-cv-00361-TDC) BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES BY AMICI CURIAE THE AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE TO DENY THE APPELLANTS MOTION TO STAY PENDING EXPEDITED TRIAL AND IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE OF THE DECISION BY THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND YOLANDA C. RONDON , ESQ. STAFF ATTORNEY AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE 1705 DeSales Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 244-2990 Facsimile: (202) 333-6470 Email: [email protected] April 19, 2017 Counsel of Record for Amici Curiae Appeal: 17-1351 Doc: 196-1 Filed: 04/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 30 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Amicus does not have a parent corporation.
  • Bcl and Mjur Class of 2019/20

    Bcl and Mjur Class of 2019/20

    FACULTY OF Profiles L AW BCL AND MJUR CLASS OF 2019/20 www.law.ox.ac.uk CLASS OF 2019/20 BCL AND MJUR 1 BCL AND MJUR PROFILE CLASS OF 2019/20 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE PROGRAMME Oxford is renowned The Oxford Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) degree has been a for the size, strength, pivotal feature of Oxford’s law provision since the sixteenth and diversity of its century. This rich history has helped to maintain its status as community of legal the most highly regarded taught masters-level qualification scholars drawn from in the common law world. Since 1991, the Magister around the world. Juris (MJur) degree has established a similar outstanding I am delighted to reputation for students from non-common law backgrounds. welcome our new class of BCL and MJur Our students benefit from Oxford’s rigorous tutorial system students to this community. which makes these degree courses so challenging. This The students also come from a diverse range environment demands exceptional academic motivation, of backgrounds; they are united by their focused analytical ability, and the capacity for sustained previous academic achievements and shared work. Students from a wide range of jurisdictions and enthusiasm for the study of law. backgrounds refine their wealth of experience, knowledge and understanding through direct and intensive engagement Christopher Hare with some of the best teachers and researchers in the world Associate Dean of Graduate Studies across a wide range of legal subjects. (Taught Courses) Oxford’s Faculty of Law was ranked second in the world in 2016 QS World University Rankings for law, and second in the Guardian’s UK University Guide 2018.
  • Litigation Edited by Evan R Chesler and Timothy G Cameron Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

    Litigation Edited by Evan R Chesler and Timothy G Cameron Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

    CHAMBERS Legal Practice Guides Litigation Edited by Evan R Chesler and Timothy G Cameron Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 2014 Chambers Legal Practice Guides For more than 20 years, Chambers Legal Guides have ranked lawyers and law firms across the world. Chambers now offer clients a new series of Legal Practice Guides, which contain practical guidance on doing legal business in key jurisdictions. We use our knowledge of the world’s best lawyers to select leading law firms in each jurisdiction to write the ‘Law & Practice’ sections. In addition, the ‘Trends & Developments’ sections analyse trends and developments in local legal markets. The ‘Doing Business In’ sections, based on the views of clients with in-depth international experience, contain hard-won knowledge about typi- cal local problems and how to overcome them – information usually missing from official guides. Disclaimer: The information in this guide is provided for general reference only, not as specific legal advice. Views expressed by the authors are not necessarily the views of the law firms in which they practise. For specific legal advice, a lawyer should be consulted. Publisher Michael Chambers Series Editor Claire Oxborrow Business Development Director Brad Sirott Editorial Contributions Monica Fuertes-Britez Orders to: Chambers & Partners Publishing Published by Chambers & Partners Publishing (a division of Orbach & Chambers Ltd) 39 Parker Street, London WC2B 5PQ Tel +44 20 7606 8844 Fax +44 20 7831 5662 Web www.chambersandpartners.com Copyright © 2014 Michael Chambers and Orbach & Chambers Ltd ISBN: 978-0-85514-684-9 Contents Our eDitorial TeaM....................p.5 iDnTrO uCTiOn.......................................p.17 ALBANIA ..........................................................Doing.Business.In.........................p.25 Law.&.Practice.................................p.29 AUT S RALIA....................................................Doing.Business.In.........................p.41 Trends.&.Developments:.
  • Exploring Alternative Approaches to Hate Crimes

    Exploring Alternative Approaches to Hate Crimes

    Exploring Alternative Approaches to Hate Crimes A collaborative report by: StanfordLawSchool Law and Policy Lab BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE IINYU ILAW June 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is a joint report of the Stanford Law School Policy Lab on Assessing Alternative Responses to Hate Crimes and the Brennan Center for Justice. The report was co-written by the following Stanford Law students under the supervision of Stanford Law Professor Shirin Sinnar and Brennan Center Fellow Michael German: Tyler Bishop ’20 Arielle Andrews ’21 Sam Becker ’22 Lauren Martin ’21 Benjy Mercer-Golden ’21 Mariel Pérez-Santiago ’20 Tiarra Rogers ’22 Kai Wiggins ’23 We would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their support and assistance on this project: Shirin Bakhshay Jeannine Bell Jami Butler Angela Chan Beth Colgan Proteus Fund Luciana Herman Stanford Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity Stanford Clayman Institute for Gender Research Stanford Law School Dean’s Office Becky Monroe Eun Sze Participants in the “Empowering Communities in the Face of Hate Crimes” Convening at Stanford Law School (March 6, 2020) (see Appendix) Exploring Alternative Approaches to Hate Crimes | June 2021 ABOUT THE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL POLICY LAB Engagement in public policy is a core mission of teaching and research at Stanford Law School. The Law and Policy Lab (The Policy Lab) offers students an immersive experience in finding solutions to some of the world’s most pressing issues. Directed by former SLS Dean Paul Brest, the Policy Lab reflects the school’s belief that systematic examination of societal problems, informed by rigorous data analysis, can generate solutions to society’s most challenging public problems.
  • The New Path to Legal Qualification - How Your Business Is Affected and How Reed Smith Can Help Contents What Is the SQE? 04

    The New Path to Legal Qualification - How Your Business Is Affected and How Reed Smith Can Help Contents What Is the SQE? 04

    The new path to legal qualification - how your business is affected and how Reed Smith can help Contents What is the SQE? 04 How does this affect my business? 05 A breakdown of the new route 06 What are the differences between the existing route and the new route? 08 How are law firms and legal education providers responding to the changes? 10 Why shouldn’t new SQE courses replicate the LPC? 11 An overview of the Reed Smith Professional SQE 12 How the Reed Smith Professional SQE works in practice 14 A model for in-house training 16 How can we help you? 17 A detailed comparison 18 Key contacts 19 What is happening to qualification? In September 2021, the Solicitors Regulation Authority are introducing a new path to qualification in England and Wales which will replace the existing qualification routes. The Legal Practice Course (LPC), Graduate Diploma in Law conversion course (GDL), Qualified Lawyers Transfer Scheme for overseas qualified lawyers (QLTS), and the Professional Skills Course (PSC) will all be replaced by the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), although there will be a transition period where both routes are available. How to qualify under the new route: • Have a degree in any subject • Pass both stages of the SQE assessment • Have two years’ qualifying work experience (QWE) • Pass the SQE character and suitability requirements Existing qualification route: University Law school Experience Law degree Legal Practice Course Training contract (2 years) or and Degree + Graduate Diploma in Law Professional Skills Course New qualification route: University Law school Experience Degree SQE 1 and SQE 2 Qualifying work experience (2 years) SQE explained: A new path to legal qualification Reed Smith 03 What is the SQE? The SQE consists of two sets of assessments that applicants must pass in order to qualify as a solicitor, split into SQE 1 (functioning legal knowledge) and SQE 2 (practical legal skills).