Jesuits' Historiographic Canon in the Works of A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jesuits' Historiographic Canon in the Works of A VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY THE LITHUANIAN INSTITUTE OF HISTORY Moreno BONDA JESUITS' HISTORIOGRAPHIC CANON IN THE WORKS OF A. WIJUK-KOIALOWICZ IN THE AGE OF THE HISTORICAL REVOLUTION (1580-1661) Doctoral Dissertation HUMANITIES, HISTORY (05 H) Kaunas, 2011 The doctoral dissertation was prepared at Vytautas Magnus University in 2006–2011. The doctoral study license is granted to Vytautas Magnus University together with the Lithuanian Institute of History by resolution No. 926 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on the 15th of July, 2003. Scientific supervisor: Prof. habil. dr. Egidijus Aleksandravičius (Vytautas Magnus University, Humanities, History 05 H) 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 6 I. EUROPEAN JESUITS' HISTORIOGRAPHIC CANON ..................................................................... 32 I.1. FOUR PARAMETERS FOR THE DEFINITION OF A JESUITS’ HISTORIOGRAPHY ..................... 33 I.1.1 Eduard Fueter’s Criteria .................................................................................................................... 33 I.1.2. Humanist Historiography as the “Origin” of the Modern One. ........................................... 36 I.1.3. Re-Definition of the First Parameter: Permanence of the Scholasticism in the Neo- Platonism .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 I.1.4. Re-Definition of the Second and Third Parameters: the Non-Opposition to the Pagan Values Tradition ............................................................................................................................................. 44 I.1.5. Re-Definition of the Fourth Parameter: Rhetoric as a Method ........................................... 48 I.2. THE PLACE OF HISTORY IN 17TH CENTURY “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCES” .......................... 52 I.2.1. Making history For the Major Glory of God (and Roman Church) ..................................... 52 I.2.2. Making History to Preserve Values: Jesuits and the New Political Doctrines ............... 54 I.2.3. The Cartesian Opposition to Memory .......................................................................................... 63 I.3. JESUITS HISTORIOGRAPHY IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE ............................................................. 70 I.3.1. General Traits of Jesuits’ Historiography ................................................................................... 71 I.3.2. Jesuit Historiographers .................................................................................................................... 77 I.3.3. Piotr Skarga and Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza – The Two Phases of Jesuits’ Historiography................................................................................................................................................ 85 I.3.4. Definition of History in the Ratio Atque Insitutio Studiorum ............................................... 89 I.4. ANTONIO POSSEVINO: THE DEFINITION OF THE HISTORIOGRAPHIC CANON ...................... 93 I.4.1. Possevino's Moscovia ......................................................................................................................... 93 I.4.2. The Bibliotheca Selecta: a Project of Historiographic Canon ............................................ 102 II. KOIALOWICZ AS A JESUIT HISTORIAN ..................................................................................... 108 II.1. FOUR UNIONIST WORKS: SKARGA'S SERMONS TO THE DIET, POSSEVINO’S MOSCOVIA AND KOIALOWICZ’S FIRST BOOK OF HISTORIAE LITUANAE AND MISCELLANEA RERUM ....... 109 II.1.1. The “Polemical” Method of Skarga ........................................................................................... 113 II.1.2 Unionism in Possevino and Koialowicz: Historiae Lituanae as Implementation of the Moscovia’s Theories. .................................................................................................................................. 114 II.1.3. Unitarism in Koialowicz’s Miscellanea Rerum ad Statum Ecclesiasticum in Magno Lituaniae Ducatu pertinentium .............................................................................................................. 122 II.2. KOIALOWICZ'S HISTORIAE LITUANAE IN THE FRAME OF THE JESUITS HISTORIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 127 II.2.1. The Portrait of Mindaugas in Koialowicz: Between the structure of Stryjkowski and the Philosophy of Mariana ....................................................................................................................... 128 II.2.2. Historiae Lituanae and Historiae de rebus Hispaniae: Outlines for a Comparative Study ................................................................................................................................................................ 134 II.3. ADAM TANNER, MARTIN BECAN AND ALBERT WIJUK-KOIALOWICZ: THE STRUGGLE AGAINST THE PHILOSOPHES FROM BOHEMIA TO LITHUANIA ....................................................... 140 II.3.1. Rhetoric as Means of Education ................................................................................................ 145 II.3.2. The Historical Context: a Force that Shapes Consciences ................................................ 148 3 II.3.3. The Second Level of Understanding of Historiae Lituanae: Religious and Political153 II.3.4. The Third Level of Understanding of Historiae Lituanae: Moral and Gnoseologic . 158 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................165 ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................................168 SOURCES ...................................................................................................................................................168 LITERATURE ...........................................................................................................................................171 PUBLICATIONS ON THE DISSERTATION THEME ........................................................................181 4 FOREWORD This Doctoral work might appear too similar to a historiography handbook than to a monographic research because of its approach to the object studied. Some will claim there is too much theory in it and not enough work in the archives. However, the main aim of a Doctoral research is to plug gaps being original and „useful.“ For this reason, and since all previous works on the subject are very vast in terms of archive research and philological analysis but very poor in terms of philosophical contextualization of the problem, we decide to adopt this second, peculiar, approach even if it is unusual for a doctoral research. 5 INTRODUCTION The Field of Research. 'Sometimes, the modern thought even seams to dissolve in the history. […] The History not only has acquired its own autonomy but the historical knowledge is now knowledge of the truth'. 1 With these two short sentences, Federico Chabod pointed out, in his Lessons of Historical Method, the relevance, in the coeval thought, of the history as an instrument of knowledge in its widest sense. According to this scholar, not only the modern identities, but also the whole modern thought is impregnated with historical reflection. However, the phenomenon is not exclusively contemporary. Particularly during the Antiquity and Middle Ages, the philosophic reflection was imbued with history even if the latter was subordinated to ethic and theology: the dawn of humanity delimited the beginning of a process due to conclude with the accomplishment of the biblical prophecy.2 By the end of the 13th century, even the heritage of the Roman history had been incorporated in the frame of a history guided by the divine providence where the unification of the known world was due to prepare the descent of Christ among the men (see §I.2.1.). Nevertheless, it is only with the sunset of the medieval forma mentis, which subordinated every aspect of life to the religion, that history begins to be partially freed from the subjection to morals and the theology. This acquired autonomy stimulated the historical debate and, in turn, the elaboration of a historical method that finally evolved in a philosophy of history. It is only with the Humanism that history becomes an autonomous discipline, independent from the high purposes of the ethic and the theology. Yet, even after the 16th century, while the autonomy of history had been fully achieved by Humanists, some Christian historians continued to understand the study of the past, and particularly its narrative, as an instrument more than a process. According to these Christian scholars of the 15th, 16th and early 17th centuries, the great efforts exerted by Christians since the fall of the Roman Empire to make history the vox Dei, could not be wasted during the ideological conflicts of the modern ages: while it is true that, on one hand, the modern thought sometimes seems to dissolve in history, on the other hand, the challenges put
Recommended publications
  • Juan De Mariana's De Monetae Mutatione(1609)
    Quantitative Easing Four Centuries Ago: Juan de Mariana’s De monetae mutatione (1609) Wim Decock Introduction Professor Donahue has repeatedly defined himself as a “text-based legal historian,” combining rigorous philological analysis of legal texts with care- ful analysis of the historical context from which these texts emerged. He is also firmly committed to the proposition shared by many legal histori- ans that institutions and legal concepts change over time, rendering his research immune from anachronistic interpretations of historical texts.1 At the same time, Professor Donahue has always seen in the close reading of texts and their contexts an excellent way of improving the dialogue between the past and the present, and, potentially, of offering historical insights to jurists involved in the solution of current issues. Therefore, this contribu- tion will dwell on a particular text by Juan de Mariana (1535–1624), a Jesuit theologian, on monetary debasement (De monetae mutatione), an issue of not merely historical interest. While firmly rooted in a specific historical context that remains different from today’s world, Mariana’s concerns are echoed in today’s economic and political debates about monetary policy which have been raging on both sides of the Atlantic in the wake of the recent sovereign debt crises. 1. E.g. Charles Donahue, “A Crisis of Law? Reflections on the Church and the Law over the Centuries,” The Jurist (2005), 3. 355 356 Wim Decock As a matter of fact, Mariana published this tract on the Spanish gov- ernment’s monetary policy in 1607, just two years after the fourth sovereign default of Spain in five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Filologia Polska 2019 (5)
    FILOLOGIA POLSKA 2019 (5) ROCZNIKI NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU ZIELONOGÓRSKIEGO Ireneusz Sikora „NAPRZÓD PRZYSZEDŁ MIKOŁAJ REJ” O LITERATURZE NIEPODLEGŁEJ POLSKI W EPISTOLOGRAFICZNEJ REFLEKSJI ELIZY ORZESZKOWEJ* Omówiony na innym miejscu tytułowo-autorski kanon literatury europejskiej1, sposoby jej czytania i pragmatycznych funkcjonalizacji w listach pisarki, dopełnić należy zarysem recepcji zjawisk kulturowo-literackich rodzimych, przywoływanych równolegle, równocześnie, bo w latach 1868-1909, i z porównywalną częstotliwością. Obecność polskiej literatury dawnej jest w korespondencji Orzeszkowej poświad- czana nazwiskami dziewiętnastu twórców i ich dzieł, spośród których najstarszy jest Biernat z Lublina (pierwsza połowa XVI w.), najmłodsi – bracia Jan i Jędrzej Śniadeccy, reprezentujący myśl naukową i filozoficzną późnego Oświecenia wileńskiego; zbiór epistolograficznych świadectw recepcji obejmuje 92 dokumenty o zróżnicowanym charakterze i wartości, ze szczególnym uprzywilejowaniem Jana Kochanowskiego (38) oraz Ignacego Krasickiego (15), ale są tam również pisarze, myśliciele, publicyści dla poszczególnych epok ważni i reprezentatywni, choć nie tak często wymieniani: Mikołaj Rej, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, Łukasz Górnicki, Szymon Szymonowicz, Piotr Skarga, Sebastian Fabian Klonowicz, Krzysztof Opaliński, Hugo Kołłątaj, Jan Ursyn Niemcewicz czy Stanisław Staszic. Uważna lektura pism krytycznoliterackich Orzeszkowej (30 nazwisk, 80 świadectw recepcji) pozwala dostrzec osiemnastu twór- ców w listach zupełnie nieobecnych: między innymi Jana Długosza,
    [Show full text]
  • New Working Papers Series, Entitled “Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics”
    Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 74 the other canon foundation, Norway Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance CONTACT: Rainer Kattel, [email protected]; Wolfgang Drechsler, [email protected]; Erik S. Reinert, [email protected] 80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought Erik S. Reinert, Kenneth Carpenter, Fernanda A. Reinert, Sophus A. Reinert* MAY 2017 * E. Reinert, Tallinn University of Technology & The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; K. Car- penter, former librarian, Harvard University; F. Reinert, The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; S. Reinert, Harvard Business School. The authors are grateful to Dr. Debra Wallace, Managing Director, Baker Library Services and, Laura Linard, Director of Baker Library Special Collections, at Harvard Business School, where the Historical Collection now houses what was once the Kress Library, for their cooperation in this venture. Above all our thanks go to Olga Mikheeva at Tallinn University of Technology for her very efficient research assistance. Antiquarian book dealers often have more information on economics books than do academics, and our thanks go to Wilhelm Hohmann in Stuttgart, Robert H. Rubin in Brookline MA, Elvira Tasbach in Berlin, and, above all, to Ian Smith in London. We are also grateful for advice from Richard van den Berg, Francesco Boldizzoni, Patrick O’Brien, Alexandre Mendes Cunha, Bertram Schefold and Arild Sæther. Corresponding author [email protected] The core and backbone of this publication consists of the meticulous work of Kenneth Carpenter, librarian of the Kress Library at Harvard Busi- ness School starting in 1968 and later Assistant Director for Research Resources in the Harvard University Library and the Harvard College 1 Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Wp988j82g]
    [https://commons.warburg.sas.ac.uk/downloads/wp988j82g] Miglietti, Sara. The censor as reader : censorial responses to Bodin’s methodus in counter-Reformation Italy (1587-1607) / Sara Miglietti. 2016 Article To cite this version: Miglietti, S. (2016). The censor as reader : censorial responses to Bodin’s methodus in counter- Reformation Italy (1587-1607) / Sara Miglietti. History of European Ideas , 42(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2016.1153289 Available at: https://commons.warburg.sas.ac.uk/concern/journal_articles/d217qp48j DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2016.1153289 Date submitted: 2019-07-22 Copyright is retained by the author. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the User Deposit Agreement. The Censor as Reader: Censorial Responses to Bodin’s Methodus in Counter- Reformation Italy (1587-1607) SARA MIGLIETTI Department of German and Romance Languages and Literatures, Johns Hopkins University Gilman Hall 481 3400 N Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218 (USA) Phone: +1-202-848-6032 Email: [email protected] 1 The Censor as Reader: Censorial Responses to Bodin’s Methodus in Counter- Reformation Italy (1587-1607) * SARA MIGLIETTI Department of German and Romance Languages and Literatures Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Summary This essay investigates censorial responses to Jean Bodin’s Methodus (1566) in Counter-Reformation Italy, using evidence from Italian libraries and archives to shed new light on the process that led to the inclusion of the work in the Roman Expurgatory Index of 1607. By examining the diverse, and sometimes conflicting, opinions that Catholic censors expressed on Bodin’s text and the ‘errors’ it contained, the essay shows that even a relatively cohesive ‘reading community’ such as that of Counter-Reformation censors could nurture fundamental disagreement in evaluating the content and dangerousness of a book, as well as in devising appropriate countermeasures.
    [Show full text]
  • ¿Quién Fue Juan De Mariana? En Busca De Un Pensador Político Europeo1
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Liverpool Repository ¿Quién fue Juan de Mariana? En busca de un pensador político europeo1 Harald E. Braun University of Liverpool ¿Quién fue Juan de Mariana? ¿Cuál es el legado de este jesuita y pensador político europeo? Las respuestas a estas preguntas dependen mayormente de a quién se interpele.2 El jesuita, ya lo sabemos, fue un hombre dotado de gran inteligencia y coraje, y que atrajo considerable polémica. Así pues, no nos puede sorprender que diferentes personas, en diferentes momentos, hayan contestado de diferentes formas. En esta ponencia propondré una respuesta. Voy a hablar de la recepción de Juan de Mariana como pensador político en Europa, fuera de España, cómo se le interpretó, cómo, a menudo, se le confundió y cómo, a veces, se le tergiversó. De la misma manera que el dominico Bartolomé de las Casas, Mariana se convirtió en parte de la leyenda negra.3 Como Las Casas, Mariana se hubiera escandalizado de ver cómo se usaron sus palabras. Hablaré también de lo que pienso que el padre Mariana quería decir y de por qué nosotros, hoy, en Europa, tendríamos que escucharle y tomar muy en serio sus palabras. Empecemos, pues, con la leyenda negra de Juan de Mariana. Examinemos la reputación de Mariana entre sus contemporáneos. Déjenme que les lleve a Londres, Inglaterra. Corre el año de 1 Este es el texto ligeramente enmendado de la conferencia pronunciada en el Congreso Internacional de Filosofía La actualidad del padre Juan de Mariana, Talavera de la Reina, 22-24 de marzo de 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Papacy and the Birth of the Polish-Russian Hatred Autor Tekstu: Mariusz Agnosiewicz
    The papacy and the birth of the Polish-Russian hatred Autor tekstu: Mariusz Agnosiewicz Tłumaczenie: Katarzyna Goliszek Niniejsze tłumaczenie fragmentu mojej publikacji, która jest częścią II tomu Kryminalnych dziejów papiestwa (http://www.racjonalista.pl/ks.php/k,2231), ukazało się wraz z komentarzem Czesława Białczyńskiego (http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czesław_Białczyński), pt. Reconciliation Poland — Russia, back in the years of 1610-1612 and the Counter-Reformation (http://bialczynski.wordpress.com/slowianie-tradycje-kultura- dzieje/zblizenie-polska-rosja/p apiestwo-i-narodziny-nienawisci -polsko-rosyjskiej-czyli-jeszcz e-o-latach-1610-1612-i-o-kontrr eformacji/reconciliation-poland -russia-back-in-the-years-of-16 10-1612-and-the-counter-reforma tion-eng/). MA For Anti memory of Piotr Skarga Pope Paul V (1605-1621), began his pontificate by pushing Poland for anti-Russian dymitriads, one of the most stupid and most tragic episodes of our history, and ended it when his circulatory system sustained a joyous overload during the procession in honor of the massacre of Czechs in the Thirty Years' War. The participation of the Papacy and the Jesuits in the tragic Polish anti-Russian rows is usually passed over in silence. For Russia's resurgent power it was a historically traumatic event that put a strain on the entire subsequent Polish-Russian relationships, and should never be ignored while remembrance of the partitions of Poland. When in 2005 Russia replaced their old national holiday commemorating the outbreak of the October Revolution with the Day of National Unity commemorating the liberation of Moscow from the Poles in Russia in 1612, the Vatican expressed concern that it could be of the anti-Catholic nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Readers, Sanctity, and History in Early Modern Spain Pedro de Ribadeneyra, the Flos sanctorum, and Catholic Community by Jonathan Edward Greenwood A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2011 Jonathan Edward Greenwood Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your rile Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83071-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83071-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781107141827 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-14182-7 — Botero: The Reason of State Giovanni Botero , Edited by Robert Bireley Index More Information Index This index does not include topics and concepts that are listed in the extensive Table of Contents. Acarnanians, Apelles, actors, appearance and reality, xxiv–xxv Additions to the Reason of State, xxiv Archimedes, Aemilius Paulus, , , architectural enterprises, xxviii, – Afonso de Albuquerque, Ariosto, Agathocles, Aristotle, , , , , , , , , , , Agesilaus, , , , Agrippa, Marcus Vispanius, Aritperto, Ahab, Arnulf (emperor), Alaric, , arquebus, Alba, duke of, , , artisans, , Alexander III (pope), Assyrians, Alexander Severus, , astuteness, , Alexander the Great, , , , , , , , Attila, , , , , , , , , , Attilius Regulus, Augustus, , , , , , , , , , Alexander (king of the Jews), , , , , , , , , Alexis I Comnenus, Aurelian, , , Alfonso I (king of Naples), , auspices, Alfonso II (duke of Calabria), Austrian royal house, Alfonso II (king of Naples), Avignon, Alfonso III (king of Spain), Alfonso V (of Aragon), , Bajazet II, Alfonso X (king of Castile), , , Baroque, xxii Almeida, Francisco de, Basil the Macedonian, Ammirato, Scipione, xviii, xxi begging, Amurath, Bellarmine, Robert, xviii, xix, xx Antigonus I, Boccalini, Traiano, xxi Antimachiavellians, xvi, xxi, xxii Bodin, Jean, xvii, xix, xx, xxi, xxvi, xxxii, Antiochus III the Great, , , xxxiii, , , , , © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-14182-7
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Resources for Cataloguing German and Low Countries Imprints to Ca. 1800
    Geleitwort Wer sich mit der Ermittlung, der Katalogisierung oder dem bibliographischen Nachweis Alter Drucke befasst, benötigt eine breite Palette der unterschiedlichsten Hilfsmittel. Da, wo noch keine modernen Standardreferenzwerke vorliegen, ist der Rückgriff auf ältere, zeitnahe oder zeitgenössische Werke oft unverzichtbar. Im Rahmen seiner langjährigen Tätigkeit an der National Library of Scotland hat sich Dr. William A. Kelly intensiv mit der retrospektiven Bibliographie der deutschen und der niederländischen Druckschriften beschäftigt und über viele Jahre hinweg auf diesem Gebiet ein beinahe konkurrenzloses Expertenwissen erworben. Es ehrt ihn, dass er diese Kenntnisse von Anfang an mit anderen, bibliothekarischen Kollegen zumal, teilen wollte. Ursprünglich war „nur“ an eine Ergänzung eines bereits 1982 eingeführten Hilfsmittels gedacht – der Standard Citation Forms of published bibliographies and catalogues used in rare book cataloging nämlich. Angesichts der umfassenden Kenntnisse und der Gründlichkeit des Bearbeiters zeigte sich jedoch rasch, dass das Supplement für den deutschen und niederländischen Bereich den Umfang des gesamten Hauptwerks um ein vielfaches übertreffen würde: In seinem verdienstvollen Verzeichnis weist Dr. Kelly fast 2.150 einschlägige (bio-)bibliographische Nachschlagewerke nach. Da ein derart hoch-spezialisiertes Werk jedoch naturgemäß nur einen sehr eingeschränkten Käuferkreis findet, mochte – trotz großer inhaltlicher Wertschätzung - kein Verleger das unternehmerische Risiko einer kommerziellen Publikation
    [Show full text]
  • From "Russian" to "Polish": Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925
    FROM “RUSSIAN” TO “POLISH”: Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925 Theodore R. Weeks Southern Illinois University at Carbondale The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17th Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Theodore R. Weeks Council Contract Number: 819-06g Date: June 4, 2004 Copyright Information Scholars retain the copyright on works they submit to NCEEER. However, NCEEER possesses the right to duplicate and disseminate such products, in written and electronic form, as follows: (a) for its internal use; (b) to the U.S. Government for its internal use or for dissemination to officials of foreign governments; and (c) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the U.S. government that grants the public access to documents held by the U.S. government. Additionally, NCEEER has a royalty-free license to distribute and disseminate papers submitted under the terms of its agreements to the general public, in furtherance of academic research, scholarship, and the advancement of general knowledge, on a non-profit basis. All papers distributed or disseminated shall bear notice of copyright. Neither NCEEER, nor the U.S. Government, nor any recipient of a Contract product may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Duchy of Lithuania As a Successor of Rome in the Early
    Open Political Science, 2018; 1: 170–181 Research Article Joanna Orzeł* From imagination to political reality? The Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a successor of Rome in the early modern historiography (15th–18th centuries)# https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0015 received December 17, 2018; accepted December 31, 2018. Abstract: At the beginning of the Renaissance Lithuanians understood that to join the civilization of Western Europe, it was necessary to have an appropriate (it means: very long) tradition. Like other countries, they had to create their own myth of origin. The most prestigious tradition was Greek-Roman antiquity, so the country’s origin story was invented, claiming its people descended directly from Rome. According to subsequent chronicles, the founder of the new state was Palemon (Publius Libon, initially Vilia). Using the theory of cultural memory of Jan and Aleida Assmann, the article presents how and why the Lithuanian myth of origin was transformed from 15th to the end of the 18th century. Particular attention was paid to the current needs of the state and the powerful noble families of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which also found their origins in the state myth. During the early modern period, the changes in the story were made (including the date of Palemon’s arrival in the Lithuanian lands). Nonetheless, the myth was not questioned for a long time. Even once it had already been established that it was no more than a fairy tale, the story was revived again, performing other functions in the 19th century. Keywords: cultural memory; foundation myth; mythical genealogy; Palemon; the Grand Duchy of Lithuania; Polish- Lithuanian historiography; Greco-Roman antiquity in early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian O'leary Conceived His Book As a Journey To
    “Brian O’Leary conceived his book as a journey to discover the ‘landscape’ of Ignatian spirituality—its origin in Ignatius’ experience and context and its current experience in a very different context. The ‘landscape’ most readers think familiar, in this writer’s hands turns out to be full of rich surprises. God Ever Greater is a book to hold on to.” —Joseph A. Tetlow, SJ Director of Montserrat Jesuit Retreat House Lake Dallas, Texas “Like Ignatius, O’Leary ‘begins’ where we are, and then progressively helps us to move more deeply so that we can both better understand and respond more generously to a God who is always greater.” —James T. Bretzke, SJ Professor of Theology John Carroll University God Ever Greater Exploring Ignatian Spirituality Brian O’Leary, SJ LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org Cover design by Monica Bokinskie. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Com- mons. The Vision of Ignatius of Loyola, ca. 1622–1630, oil on canvas. First published in 2018 by Messenger Publications. © Brian O’Leary, SJ, 2019. This edition of God Ever Greater is published by arrangement with Messenger Publications, Dublin, Ireland. Published by Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights re- served. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, except brief quotations in reviews, without written permis- sion of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, PO Box 7500, Collegeville, MN 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 123456789 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: O’Leary, Brian, author. Title: God ever greater : exploring Ignatian spirituality / Brian O’Leary, SJ.
    [Show full text]