DA Mcmahon Announces Promotions and New Hires to RCDA **Former NYPD Lieutenant Joins RCDA As Chief of Detective Investigators**

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DA Mcmahon Announces Promotions and New Hires to RCDA **Former NYPD Lieutenant Joins RCDA As Chief of Detective Investigators** OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY RICHMOND COUNTY MICHAEL E. MCMAHON DISTRICT ATTORNEY 130 STUYVESANT PLACE STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK 10301 TELEPHONE (718) 876-6300 PRESS RELEASE For immediate release on June 8, 2018 Contact: Ryan Lavis (718) 556-7150 [email protected] DA McMahon Announces Promotions and New Hires to RCDA **Former NYPD Lieutenant joins RCDA as Chief of Detective Investigators** STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. – Richmond County District Attorney Michael E. McMahon today announced several new promotions and hires to RCDA. Joining the office as Chief of Detective Investigators is former NYPD Lieutenant David J. Nilsen, a veteran of the police department with 27 years of experience. Also new to the office is Assistant District Attorney Jevet T. Johnson, a career prosecutor who has been named Bureau Chief of RCDA’s Special Victim’s Bureau. Additionally, DA McMahon announced that ADA Michele Molfetta has been promoted to Chief of the Narcotics-Investigations Bureau after previously serving as the bureau’s deputy chief. At the same time, ADA Wanda DeOliveira has been named Chief Trial Counsel after previously serving as Chief of the Special Victims Bureau. “RCDA is committed to bringing in the most skilled people to carry out the important work we do in keeping Staten Island safe, and I am thrilled to have Lt. Commander Nilsen and ADA Johnson join the office as an integral part of my team. We are equally excited to have ADA Molfetta head up our Narcotics-Investigations Bureau to lead our fight against the heroin and opioid epidemic, and ADA DeOliveira in joining the Executive Team as Chief Trial Counsel – her many years of prosecutorial experience makes her invaluable to this office and the people of Staten Island, ” said District Attorney Michael E. McMahon. “The passion and expertise these talented individuals bring to the table will go far in holding criminals accountable, protecting victims of crime, and combating the many issues we face on Staten Island every day.” Lt. David Nilsen is a 27-year veteran of the NYPD, who, throughout his career in law enforcement, has worked tirelessly to make Staten Island a safer place. He served as Commanding Officer of the Staten Island Homicide Squad from 2006-2014, supervising over 300 non-fatal shootings and over 100 homicide investigations. Prior to that role, Lt. Nilsen served as Commanding Officer of the 120 Precinct Detective Squad, from 2001-2006, providing supervision and guidance for over 3,500 investigations annually. Throughout his distinguished career, Lt. Nilsen was responsible for leading investigations into some of the most notable cases on Staten Island. He supervised the homicide investigation into the deaths of Detective James Nemorin and Detective Rodney Andrews, who were both tragically shot and killed March 10, 2003 while involved in an undercover buy and bust operation on Staten Island. In October 2003, Lt. Nilsen supervised all investigate operations into the crash involving a Staten Island Ferry boat, which claimed the lives of 11 people and seriously injured dozens of others. Additionally, Lt. Nilsen supervised several other high-profile homicides on Staten Island, including the December 2007 investigation into the death of FDNY Fire Marshall Douglas Mercereau; the July 2012 investigation into the death of Simonette Mapes, and the August 2013 investigation into the death of Megan Marotte. Most recently, he served as Lieutenant Commander of the NYPD’s Detective Squad and Commanding Officer of the Cold Case Squad, which is responsible for investigating open unsolved homicides throughout the City. During his tenure in the Cold Case Squad, he supervised investigations into homicide cases which led to arrests being made, including in the death of Sharabia Thomas and the death of Rashawn Brazell. From 2015-2016, Lt. Nilsen worked as Commanding Officer of the NYPD’s Hostage Negotiation Team, which assists in crisis situations such as hostage and barricaded persons incidents. He currently resides on Staten Island. Jevet Johnson began her career as an Assistant District Attorney in the Bronx DA’s Office, working in the Criminal Court and Grand Jury Bureau from 2001-2004, and then in the Narcotics Bureau from 2004-2012, where she prosecuted over fifteen jury trials ranging from narcotics to homicides. She was also Weekend Supervisor of the Complaint Room from 2008-2013, and worked in the office’s Child Abuse and Sex Crimes Bureau from 2012-2013, where she prosecuted violent sexual assault and child abuse cases, including convicting defendants in a case of a push in robbery of a family at gunpoint where the mother was raped, as well as a case in which a photographer lured women to his home and sexually abused them. After leaving the Bronx DA’s office, Johnson worked as an Agency Attorney for the Department of Education in the Office of the General Counsel, from 2013-2015, where she conducted hearings against teachers and other employees of the Department of Education accused of violating the Chancellor’s Regulations and/or New York State criminal statutes. From 2015-2016, she worked as an ADA in the Westchester County DA’s Office, and, later, worked as an Agency Attorney for the New York City Department of Correction. Johnson earned her law degree in May 2001 from Touro College- Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center in Huntington, NY. Michele Molfetta began her career as an Assistant District Attorney in the Richmond County DA’s Office in September 2005, working in the Criminal Court Bureau. In 2007, Molfetta was transferred to the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor in Manhattan, where she prosecuted hundreds of felony narcotics and weapons cases and conducted numerous felony narcotics trials. During her time with the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor in Manhattan, Molfetta worked with various local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, including various units of the NYPD, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the New York Drug Enforcement Task Force, and the Strike Force, to conduct complex, multi-jurisdictional, including international, narcotics investigations. She returned to RCDA in 2010, working in the Investigations Bureau where she conducted numerous long-term major narcotics and gang related investigations, which resulted in the recovery of kilogram quantities of narcotics and the arrest and prosecution of over 100 defendants, most of whom were violent felony offenders. During her time as a prosecutor, Molfetta has tried numerous felony cases ranging from complex wiretap investigations to homicides. In early 2016, Molfetta worked as the Deputy Bureau Chief in the Criminal Court Bureau. Later in 2016, Molfetta was promoted to Deputy Bureau Chief of RCDA’s Narcotics-Investigations Bureau, and was responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the Narcotics-Investigations Bureau, which includes the supervision of all narcotics and gang related prosecutions and investigations, as well as overseeing all drug related diversion programs such as Staten Island Treatment Court and HOPE. She earned her law degree from the New England School of Law in Boston in May 2005. She currently resides on Staten Island. Wanda DeOliveira graduated from St. John’s University, Staten Island Campus in 1989 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Criminal Justice. She went on to earn her law degree from St. John’s University School of Law, graduating in 1992. From there, she was admitted to practice and was hired by the Kings County District Attorney’s Office as an Assistant District Attorney where she worked from 1992 to 1997. In 1997, Ms. DeOliveira left the Brooklyn D.A.’s Office to start her own private law practice on Staten Island, which included civil claims as well as criminal defense work. While working full-time as a private attorney, she had her two daughters in less than a three-year span before returning to being a prosecutor in 2000, this time in the Richmond County District Attorney’s Office under the Honorable William Murphy. During her career at the Staten Island D.A.’s Office she has worked as the Deputy Bureau Chief in the Special Victims Bureau from 2005 to 2008 and then as the Deputy Bureau Chief in the Trials Bureau until 2010, when she was then named Chief Trial Counsel to continue her love of trial advocacy in mentoring the junior assistants with their trials. After the retirement of former Special Victims Bureau Chief Yolanda Rudich, in 2014, Ms. DeOliveira was asked to return to the Special Victims Bureau as the new Bureau Chief, a position she held until July 2017 when she was promoted to the Executive Bureau as Chief Trial Counsel. She has been in the courtroom, on trial, in over seventy five cases during the course of her career as a prosecutor, has tried over 15 homicide cases in Richmond County alone, and has investigated, assigned, and prosecuted hundreds of other murder cases. She was assigned to lead a team of investigators and was the sole prosecutor in the County assigned to review over 150 Cold Case Homicide cases dating back to the 1980s for new DNA evidence. Ms. DeOliveira has been a lead participant in the several of Staten Island’s most noteworthy cases and has personally taken several of them to trial, namely: the double murder /arson of Rocco Mercurio and his wife Linda Torrone on Ward Hill in 2001, sending defendant Mario Mannino to prison for 82 years to life; in 2002, she tried and convicted Elena Kiejlieches for murdering her husband in a mansion on Todt Hill; in 2003, Ms. DeOliveira was one of the four prosecutors
Recommended publications
  • THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY AS a SAFETY VALVE Paul Mysliwiec
    THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY AS A SAFETY VALVE Paul Mysliwiec ABSTRACT Fifteen states do not have a death penalty, and yet the federal government can federally prosecute capital cases on historically state- prosecuted violent crimes. This note discusses several problems related to the way non-death penalty states interact with the federal government, and seeks to offer resolutions where possible. For instance, what keeps the federal government from encroaching on a state’s ability to choose not to have a death penalty? Can a state or defendant stop the federal government in court? What stops federal prosecutors from unilaterally taking over cases to seek a death sentence? Finally, do state legislatures feel like they can have it both ways, saving the political capital it might require to reinstate a death penalty, and instead having federal prosecutors take the most egregious cases? Is the federal death penalty really a safety valve for the most heinous offenders in states with no death penalty? This note comes to several conclusions. First, there is generally no judicial remedy when federal prosecutors choose to seek charges without discrimination or invidious motive. Second, it is not the intent of the Justice Department to substitute their judgment for the state’s by replacing state death penalties with the federal death penalty. Third, the changes Attorney General Ashcroft made to the Death Penalty Protocol lead reasonable observers to the conclusion that the Justice Department does substitute their judgment for the state’s, and those changes should be undone. Fourth, while state legislatures may view the federal death penalty as a safety valve, there is not much the Justice Department can, or should, do about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Law Program Fall 2014-Spring 2015 Course Offerings*
    CLINICAL LAW PROGRAM FALL 2014-SPRING 2015 COURSE OFFERINGS* JACOB D. FUCHSBERG CLINICAL LAW CENTER TH 245 SULLIVAN STREET, 5 FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10012 212-998-6430 *AS OF APRIL 1, 2014 CONSULT WEBSITE FOR UPDATES: http://www.law.nyu.edu/academics/clinics/ Table of Contents Applications Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Guidelines for Clinical Courses ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Clinic Matching and Selection Process .................................................................................................................................... 4 Submitting Clinic Preferences ........................................................................................................................................ 4 How Clinic Matching is Conducted ................................................................................................................................ 4 Acceptance Notification and Registration ..................................................................................................................... 4 Permission to Register ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 9V9-Corrections
    Deaths Prompt Affordable Long Island Proposed iPod Ban Rail Road Tickets A c t By Joe Rios One SBU student commented, “People are By Jamie Freiermuth fellow student brought up the unaff o r d a b i l- ___________ just idiots. At a crosswalk, they don't do _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ity of LIRR tickets for students, A n t o n e l l i the simple things, like looking both ways had the bill on the floor. “As a representa- The news rapidly crossed the globe, before crossing. They automatically think Students coming back to Stony Brook tive of the undergraduate student body it is from New York to London to Australia. that just because they are at a crosswalk, met with a surprising expense relief this my obligation and duty to do my best to Just a few days ago, a New York state sen- they are completely safe. There is no spring semester. The USG’s A ff o r d a b l e accommodate their concerns,” he said. ator proposed legislation to make the use excuse for not being aware of your sur- Long Island Rail Road Tickets Act (ALIR- “This was the first time I had actually heard of any technological device in a crosswalk roundings.” This holds especially true on a RT) is now in effect, allowing students to a student complaint as an elected official so subject to a fine similar to jaywalking. campus like Stony Brook, where some stu- purchase their LIRR tickets at a discounted it was extremely important to make sure State Senator Carl Kruger is the man dents don’t even look to see if the road is rate, half off the ticket price to both city something was done.” The USG has behind the legislation, inspired after two clear before stepping out into traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York
    Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 293 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 04-CR-1016 (NGG) RONELL WILSON, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, District Judge. A jury has found Ronell Wilson (“Wilson”) guilty of two counts of murder in aid of racketeering, two counts of robbery conspiracy, one count of attempted robbery, one count of carjacking, two counts of causing death through use of a firearm, and two counts of using a firearm in furtherance of crimes of violence. These charges were based on, inter alia, Wilson’s March 10, 2003 execution of undercover New York City Police Department Detectives Rodney Andrews and James Nemorin, whom he was attempting to rob of the $1,200 they planned to use to purchase a firearm from Wilson and his fellow members of the Stapleton Crew street gang. (See Order dated January 9, 2007 at 3-7.) The Government will seek the death penalty against Wilson in a penalty phase that will begin on January 16, 2007. During the penalty phase, at the conclusion of which the jury will make a binding recommendation as to Wilson’s sentence, “information may be presented as to any matter relevant to the sentence, including any mitigating or aggravating factor permitted or required to be considered under [18 U.S.C.] section 3592.” 18 U.S.C. § 3593(c). Section 3592(a) lists seven mitigating factors and permits a defendant to introduce proof of “[o]ther factors in the 1 Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 293 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> defendant’s background, record, or character or any other circumstances of the offense that mitigate against imposition of the death sentence.” 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York
    Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 294 Filed 01/15/07 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 04-CR-1016 (NGG) RONELL WILSON, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, District Judge. A jury has found Ronell Wilson (“Wilson”) guilty of two counts of murder in aid of racketeering, two counts of robbery conspiracy, one count of attempted robbery, one count of carjacking, two counts of causing death through use of a firearm, and two counts of using a firearm in furtherance of crimes of violence. These charges were based on, inter alia, Wilson’s execution of undercover New York City Police Department Detectives Rodney Andrews and James Nemorin, whom he was attempting to rob of the $1,200 they planned to use to purchase a firearm from Wilson and his fellow members of the Stapleton Crew street gang. (See Order dated January 9, 2007 at 3-7.) The Government will seek the death penalty against Wilson in a penalty phase that will begin on January 16, 2007. Wilson has moved this court to preclude the Government from presenting, during the penalty phase, (1) a mental-condition expert witness to rebut evidence that Wilson may offer regarding his mental condition and (2) evidence that Wilson committed five adjudicated crimes, three unadjudicated crimes, and, while incarcerated, approximately fifteen disciplinary violations. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are DENIED. The motion regarding 1 Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 294 Filed 01/15/07 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> the Government’s mental-condition expert may be re-filed at the conclusion of Wilson’s mitigation case.
    [Show full text]
  • Will New York's Defeated Death Penalty Be Resurrected? Diana N
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 35 | Number 5 Article 4 2008 To Act Or Not To Act: Will New York's Defeated Death Penalty Be Resurrected? Diana N. Huffman Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Diana N. Huffman, To Act Or Not To Act: Will New York's Defeated Death Penalty Be Resurrected? , 35 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1139 (2008). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol35/iss5/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\F\FUJ\35-5\FUJ504.txt unknown Seq: 1 4-NOV-08 13:25 TO ACT OR NOT TO ACT: WILL NEW YORK’S DEFEATED DEATH PENALTY BE RESURRECTED? Diana N. Huffman Introduction...................................................1140 R I. The Rise and Fall of New York’s Death Penalty Statute .................................................1141 R A. Supreme Court Jurisprudence on Capital Punishment ........................................1142 R B. New York’s 1995 Statute in Light of Supreme Court Mandates ...................................1144 R C. The Jury’s Role In New York Capital Trials ......1146 R D. The Anticipatory Deadlock Provision .............1147 R E. New York’s Death Penalty Found Unconstitutional ...................................1149 R 1. People v. LaValle ..............................1149 R 2. People v. Taylor ...............................1150 R F. Legislative Action Post-LaValle ...................1153 R II.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Initial Indictment, Four Co-Defendants, Michael Whitten
    Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 113 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 54 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 04-CR-1016 (NGG) v. RONELL WILSON, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, District Judge. Defendant Ronell Wilson (“Defendant” or “Wilson”) is charged in a twenty-three count indictment with, inter alia, murdering undercover New York Police Department (“NYPD”) Detectives Rodney Andrews and James Nemorin on March 10, 2003.1 Specifically, in connection with his alleged membership in the street gang known as the “Stapleton Crew,” the criminal enterprise alleged in the Indictment, Wilson is charged with the following: engaging in and conspiring to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity; committing obstruction of justice murder, murder in aid of racketeering, carjacking; use of a firearm and causing death through the use of a firearm; robbery and robbery conspiracy; narcotics distribution and narcotics conspiracy; use of a firearm in connection with narcotics trafficking; conspiring to murder rival gang 1 In the initial Indictment, four co-defendants, Michael Whitten, Paris Bullock, Angel Rodriguez, and Jamal Brown, were indicted with Wilson in a thirty-count indictment. These four co-defendants have since pleaded guilty to racketeering and narcotics-related charges and are awaiting sentencing before this court. On June 9, 2006, the Government filed a Superseding Indictment (S-1) in this case, which removes Wilson’s four co-defendants from the Indictment. (See Docket Entry No. 109). As the Superseding Indictment was filed after briefing on these motions, so as not to confuse the subject matter contained in the parties’ submissions, citations to the Indictment in this M&O are to the original thirty-count Indictment, and not to the Superseding Indictment, unless specifically noted as a citation to S-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Yasser Payne (May 27, 2016)
    PAYNE, YASSER Page 1 YASSER ARAFAT PAYNE, Ph. D. 337 Smith Hall Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 19716 302-831-4383 [email protected] EDUCATION: HUNTER COLLEGE-CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, New York City CENTER FOR URBAN AND COMMUNITY HEALTH NIH/NIDA Post-Doctoral Fellow, April, 2005–April, 2006 GRADUATE CENTER-CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Ph. D, May, 2005 Social-Personality Psychology GRADUATE CENTER-CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Master of Philosophy, October 2003 Social-Personality Psychology HUNTER COLLEGE-CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, New York City En-Route Master of Arts Degree, February 2002 Social-Personality Psychology SETON HALL UNIVERSITY, South Orange, New Jersey Master of Arts Degree, May 1999 Psychological Studies WAGNER COLLEGE, Staten Island, New York City Bachelor of Arts Degree, May 1997 Major: Psychology Minor: English ACADEMIC POSITIONS: 9/16–present Associate Professor; Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice Joint Appointment: Department of Africana Studies & Women’s Studies University of Delaware 9/12–present Departmental Affiliation, Education Department (Sociocultural and Community Approaches to Education Ph. D. Program), University of Delaware 9/11–9/16 Associate Professor; Department of Africana Studies 9/11–9/16 Secondary Appointment; Sociology Department University of Delaware 9/06–9/11 Tenure Track Assistant Professor; Department of Africana Studies Secondary Appointment; Sociology Department University of Delaware FACULTY ASSOCIATE: 9/11–present Center for the Study of Diversity, University of Delaware 9/17-present Center for Drug & Health Studies, Dept. of Sociology & Criminal Justice, UD 9/17-present Center for Interprofessional Development, Education, & Research, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective (1990-2014)
    The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York: A Retrospective (1990-2014) The New York County Lawyers Association Committee on the Federal Courts May 2015 Copyright May 2015 New York County Lawyers Association 14 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10007 phone: (212) 267-6646; fax: (212) 406-9252 Additional copies may be obtained on-line at the NYCLA website: www.nycla.org TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE COURT (1865-1990)............................................................ 3 Founding: 1865 ........................................................................................................... 3 The Early Era: 1866-1965 ........................................................................................... 3 The Modern Era: 1965-1990 ....................................................................................... 5 1990-2014: A NEW ERA ...................................................................................................... 6 An Increasing Docket .................................................................................................. 6 Two New Courthouses for a New Era ........................................................................ 7 The Vital Role of the Eastern District’s Senior Judges............................................. 10 The Eastern District’s Magistrate Judges: An Indispensable Resource ................... 11 The Bankruptcy
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York
    Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 295 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 04-CR-1016 (NGG) RONELL WILSON, Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, District Judge. A jury has found Ronell Wilson (“Wilson”) guilty of two counts of murder in aid of racketeering, two counts of robbery conspiracy, one count of attempted robbery, one count of carjacking, two counts of causing death through use of a firearm, and two counts of using a firearm in furtherance of crimes of violence. These charges were based on, inter alia, Wilson’s execution of undercover New York City Police Department Detectives Rodney Andrews and James Nemorin. (See Order dated January 9, 2007 at 3-7.) The Government is seeking the death penalty against Wilson in a penalty phase that began on January 16, 2007. Wilson has moved the court to preclude the testimony of Shabucalik Geralds (“Geralds”), who is incarcerated for offenses unrelated to those underlying this case. The Government intends to call Geralds to testify as to statements Wilson made while he and Geralds were incarcerated together. Wilson argues that Geralds’ testimony should be precluded under Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964) because Geralds, prior to hearing the statements as to which he will testify in this case, agreed to cooperate with the Government on another, unrelated case. Wilson’s motion is DENIED. 1 Case 1:04-cr-01016-NGG Document 295 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID> The Second Circuit has explained that– In Massiah, the Supreme Court held that it is a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel for a private individual, acting as a government agent, to “deliberately elicit[ ]” incriminating statements from the accused.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York
    Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Management of the Special Programs Unit at the Federal Bureau of Prisons Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York Evaluation and Inspections Division 15-08 September 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Ronell Wilson was convicted in 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York of capital murder for killing two undercover New York City police detectives. In 2007, Judge Nicholas Garaufis sentenced Wilson to death. On February 18, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Wilson’s conviction but vacated the death sentence and remanded the case for a new penalty phase trial. On July 24, 2013, a federal jury again unanimously returned a death penalty recommendation and, on September 10, 2013, Judge Garaufis reinstated the death sentence. While at the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York (MDC Brooklyn) awaiting the new penalty phase trial and resentencing, Wilson had a months-long sexual relationship with then Correctional Officer Nancy Gonzalez that resulted in the birth of their child. Gonzalez’s conduct was investigated by the Investigations Division of the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and she was prosecuted for and convicted of Sexual Intercourse with a Ward. During Wilson’s resentencing hearing in 2013, an inmate housed in the same unit as Wilson testified that he and another inmate had submitted a handwritten complaint to MDC Brooklyn’s head of security, reporting Gonzalez’s sexual relationship with Wilson. Testimony alleged that, following the inmates’ complaint, Wilson held an inquisition in the housing unit to determine who had reported him.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop Killer Death Penalty Ny
    Cop Killer Death Penalty Ny Four and habile Tobias still subtilize his forcemeat smuttily. Febrifuge Davy sicking that tarsal inured stably and vocalized light. Offsetting and distinctive Terrell recurve her tonsils cognisance stage and albuminize cavalierly. Gorilla glue on hong kong and threatened suicide, business news of death penalty in An unincorporated area, ny health stories each other things off her a cop killer death penalty ny. Instead be giving herself up, correction, on Dec. End Amazon Publisher Services Library download code. Has anyone jump through learn the Givernors office? The moment is defined. Florida Highway Patrol Troopers say the character in the pickup truck died from his injuries. Bell finally convinced the Gov. Trial in slaying of HPD Sgt. Columbus Police Chief Tom Quinlan. Now, Terrell, we become on discussions related to local stories by are own staff. Governor Pataki is renewing his call for legislation that ill give a death penalty as people inside kill police officers. If you should be next month of prisons in cop killer death penalty ny latest central park in. Get editorials from mount vernon, ny retail business and cop killer death penalty ny latest scores, ny rangers hockey coverage on staten island business news and personalities or business news conference academic team. Countless politicians have spoken of fighting for our principles. New York City police officers were killed. We can react with bitterness and division and be trapped by the sins of our savings, while every thing criminal is close to especially the streets. The meaning of his statement is still uncertain.
    [Show full text]