DOCSLIB.ORG

29Th Oil Shale Symposium 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
29Th Oil Shale Symposium 2009 29th Oil Shale Symposium 2009 Golden,xxx Colorado, USA 19-21 October 2009 Volume 1 of 2 ISBN: 978-1-61782-508-8 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2009) by the Colorado School of Mines All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2011) For permission requests, please contact the Colorado School of Mines at the address below. Colorado School of Mines 1500 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401 Phone: 303-273-3000 or 800-446-9488 www.mines.edu Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SESSION 1: WELCOMING PLENARY Co-Chairs: Myles W. Scoggins, Jeremy Boak A Colorado Viewpoint on the Development of Oil Shale Resources..................................................................................1 Bob Randall Energy is Important to Utah and Utah is Important to Energy ........................................................................................5 Alan Walker Oil Shale and Global Energy Needs ................................................................................................................................... 33 Richard Lowe SESSION 2: PROGRAM OVERVIEW PLENARY Co-Chairs: Jeremy Boak, Dag Nummedal A New Improved Solid Heat Carrier Technology (Enefit 280) for Processing of Oil Shale with Different Grades .................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Indrek Aarna, Andreas Orth New Generation Shale Oil Plant: Design, Construction and Commissioning................................................................. 62 Jaanus Purga Developing a US Oil Shale Industry – Overcoming the Challenges ................................................................................ 63 Sandor Liive U.S. Oil Shale Task Force Education and Outreach Activities........................................................................................ 79 Andrew Browning SESSION 3: IN SITU PROCESSING Co-Chairs: Carl Palmer, Bill Symington Spatial Distribution of Geochemical Changes About an Oil Shale Retort...................................................................... 91 Carl Palmer, Earl Mattson, Robert Perkins, Mitchell Plummer, Thomas Wood Construction and Testing of Shell’s Freeze Wall ............................................................................................................ 111 Wolfgang Deeg, Sepehr Arbabi, Richard Mykitta, Jeffrey Smith, Larry Crump Field Testing of Electrofrac™ Process Elements at ExxonMobil’s Colony Mine ........................................................ 126 William A. Symington, James S. Burns, Wadood El-Rabaa, Glenn A. Otten, Norman Pokutylowicz, P. Matthew Spiecker, Richard W. Williamson, Jesse D. Yeakel SESSION 4: PYROLYSIS Co-Chairs: William Taciuk, Neil Bostrom Realistic Oil Shale Pyrolysis Programs: Kinetics and Quantitative Analysis............................................................... 159 Neil Bostrom, Gabriela Leu, Malka Machlus, Andrew E. Pomerantz, Robert L. Kleinberg Test Results Relating to Changes in Oil Yield and Gas Compositions of Oil Shale Samples Subjected to Short-to-Medium Time and Temperature Exposure at Atmospheric Pressure....................................................... 175 William Taciuk Effect of Oil Shale Particle Size on Oil Yield, Sulfur and Distillation Fractions.......................................................... 236 Omar Al-Ayed, Zaid Al-Anbar Permeability Changes of Fractured Oil Shale Cores During Retorting........................................................................ 264 Earl Mattson, Carl Palmer, Erik Johnson, Hai Huang, Tom Wood SESSION 5: RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION UPDATE Co-Chairs: Glenn Vawter, James Patten White River Oil Shale Project 2009 update..................................................................................................................... 286 Gary Aho AMSO’s Colorado Oil Shale RD&D Lease Tract: Progress and Plans......................................................................... 307 Roger Day Field Test Results: EcoShale In-Capsule Technology..................................................................................................... 325 James Patten Progress Report on Oil Shale Research, Development and Demonstration (RD&D) Leases...................................... 359 Glenn Vawter, Gary Aho SESSION 6: MODELING Co-Chairs: Richard Sherritt, Milind Deo Interaction Between Reactivity and Flow in the In-situ Production of Oil from Oil Shale ......................................... 371 Jacob Bauman, Milind Deo Massively Parallel Modelling of Coupled Thermal-Hydro-Mechanical Processes During In-Situ Oil Shale Retorting .................................................................................................................................................................. 401 Hai Huang, Thomas Wood, Carl Palmer, Earl Mattson, Zhijie Xu Advances in the Steady-State Process Modeling of Oil Shale Retorting Processes ...................................................... 427 Rick Sherritt, Meilani Purnomo, Jimmy Jia, Jim Schmidt Oxygen Combustion Application and Simulation Analysis in SJ – Pyrolysis Retort Process ..................................... 462 Jimmy Jia, Rick Sherritt, Jim Schmidt, Wenzhi Shang SESSION 7: RESOURCE CHARACTERIZATION Co-Chairs: Ronald Johnson, Matthew Sares Albert County Oil Shale – Resource Characterization and Preliminary Assessment of Development Concepts ............................................................................................................................................................................. 484 Roland Butler, Lawrence Winter, Carol Seymour, J. Dean Thibault, Tim McKeen, Stephanie Scott Potential Benefits of Minerals and Metals As Added Value to Oil Shale in Jordan..................................................... 530 Musa Resheidat, Jan Krason An Assessment of In-place Oil Shale Resources in the Green River Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado ............................................................................................................................................................................. 565 Ronald Johnson, Tracey Mercier, Michael Brownfield, Michael Pantea, Jesse Self Assessment of In-place Nahcolite Resources in the Green River Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado................... 610 Michael Brownfield, Tracey Mercier, Ronald Johnson, Jesse Self SESSION 8: SURFACE PROCESSING Co-Chairs: Gary Aho, Douglas Smoot Hydrogen Firing for a High-Capacity Rotary Kiln ........................................................................................................ 643 Ralph E. Coates, L. Douglas Smoot, Kent E. Hatfield Hydrogen and Water Requirements for the Clean Shale Oil Surface (C-SOS) Process.............................................. 668 Kent E. Hatfield, Ambar M. Ochoa, L. Douglas Smoot, Craig Eatough SESSION 9: US PROGRAM & POLICY Co-Chairs: James Killen, Khosrow Biglarbigi Profiling Oil Shale Research and Development in the United States ............................................................................ 693 James Killen, Emily Knaus Advances in Oil Shale Technologies for Potential Application in U.S. Oil Shale Resources ....................................... 711 Peter Crawford, James Killen, Emily Knaus The Current Understanding of U.S. Oil Shale Economics ............................................................................................. 737 Khosrow Biglarbigi, James Killen, Marshall Carolus Shale Oil, the New Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and Why the US Should Pursue This Strategy.............................. 761 Stephen Sewalk, Paul Chinowsky SESSION 10: OIL SHALE PROPERTIES Co-Chairs: Mike Batzle, Matther Holman Determining Oil Shale Porosity Using Borehole Gravimetry ........................................................................................ 782 Katia Pronina, Matthew Holman Elastic Properties of Source Rocks................................................................................................................................... 800 Ramil Ahmadov, Jack Dvorkin, Gary Mavko Spectroscopic and Microscopic Characterization of Oil Shale ...................................................................................... 824 Tracy Elizabeth McEvoy, Michael Batzle, Jeremy Boak, Earl D. Mattson, John Scales, George Radziszewski VOLUME 2 Pore-Scale Analysis of Pyrolyzed Oil Shale Cores .......................................................................................................... 858 Chen Lu Lin, Jan Miller, C.H. (Ken) Hsieh, Pankaj Tiwari, Milind Deo SESSION 11: SURFACE & GROUND WATER Co-Chairs: Harry Posey, Kathy Wilson Interpreting Groundwater Characteristics in Eocene Aquifers by Isotopic Measurements: Piceance Basin, Colorado.................................................................................................................................................................. 879 Harry Posey, Jim Finley, Konrad Quast Assessing Surface Water Resource Availability for Oil Shale Development Using the WARMF Model................... 896 Daniel Levitt, Al-Aziz Eddebbarh, Cathy Wilson, Andrew Wolfsberg,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMD Oil Shale Committee
    EMD Oil Shale Committee 2017 EMD Oil Shale Committee Report Justin E. Birdwell (Chair), U.S. Geological Survey November 29, 2017 Vice-Chairs: • Gerald Daub (Vice-Chair: Industry), Daub & Associates, Inc. • Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah • Michael D. Vanden Berg (Vice-Chair: Government), Utah Geological Survey Advisory Group: • Dr. Alan K. Burnham, Stanford University • Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma • Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: • John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd • Gary Aho, Sage Geotech • Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia • Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil • Ryan Clerico, Enefit American Oil • Alex Bocock, Red Leaf Resources • Christopher Hopkins, Canshale Corp. • Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group • Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp • Pierre Allix, Total S.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Low oil prices continue to hamper oil shale development around the world. Although new production capacity in Estonia and China has come online recently, efforts in other places are on indefinite hiatus or are well behind schedule relative to what was anticipated just a few years ago. The current status remains in flux, and recent developments in conventional and unconventional crude oil plays in the United States and elsewhere indicate this will not change anytime soon. Oil shale continues to be mined processed in China and Brazil, but production updates for 2016 were not available as of the preparation of this report. In Estonia, Eesti Energia (Enefit) continued development of their co-generation Auvere power plant that is designed to utilize both oil shale and other fuel sources (wood chips, peat, gas).
    [Show full text]
  • DOE/ER/30013 Prepared for Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No
    DOE/ER/30013 prepared for Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No. DE-AC02-81ER30013 SHALE OIL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INCORPORATING ORE BENEFICIATION Final Report, October 1982 by M.A. Weiss, I.V. Klumpar, C.R. Peterson & T.A. Ring Report No. MIT-EL 82-041 Synthetic Fuels Center, Energy Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Abstract This study analyzed the recovery of oil from oil shale by use of proposed systems which incorporate beneficiation of the shale ore (that is, concentration of the kerogen) before the oil-recovery step. The objective was to identify systems which could be more attractive than conventional surface retorting of ore. No experimental work was carried out. The systems analyzed consisted of beneficiation methods which could increase kerogen concentrations by at least four-fold. Potentially attractive low-enrichment methods such as density separation were not examined. The technical alternatives considered were bounded by the secondary crusher as input and raw shale oil as output. A sequence of ball milling, froth flotation, and retorting concentrate is not attractive for Western shales compared to conventional ore retorting; transporting the concentrate to another location for retorting reduces air emissions in the ore region but cost reduction is questionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues
    INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Oil Shale Development in the United States Prospects and Policy Issues James T. Bartis, Tom LaTourrette, Lloyd Dixon, D.J. Peterson, Gary Cecchine Prepared for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment (ISE), a division of the RAND Corporation, for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A History and Analysis of the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program
    Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies—Vol. II: A History and Analysis of the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program July 1980 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 80-600102 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003 -00763-1 Foreword This volume discusses the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program that began in 1974 when the U.S. Department of the Interior sold leases to four tracts in the oil shale regions of Colorado and Utah, A prior leasing attempt in 1968 is also described because it provides an historical perspective about the imperatives that have encouraged the development of Federal oil shale lands by private indus- try and the restraints that have inhibited such development. The report includes discussions of political, economic, environmental, and energy-related factors that affected both the 1968 leasing attempt and its successor—the current Prototype Program. The Program’s goals are identified, and its progress and status are examined to determine if those goals have been met or are likely to be met in the foreseeable future. &:N:zf;’- Director Oil Shale Advisory Committee James H. Gary, Chairman Colorado School of Mines James Boyd Estella B. Leopold Private Consultant University of Washington William Brennan Charles H. Prien** Rancher Denver Research Institute Rio Manco County, Colo. John F. Redmond Robert L, Coble* Retired, Shell Oil Co. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Richard D. Ridley Roland C. Fischer Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Colorado River Water Conservation Raymond L. Smith District Michigan Technological University John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Energy Development on Water Resources in Arid Lands: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography
    The Impact of Energy Development on Water Resources in Arid Lands: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography Item Type text; Book Authors Bowden, Charles Publisher Office of Arid Lands Studies, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Download date 04/10/2021 05:21:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/238692 Arid Lands Resource Information Paper No.6 University of Arizona OFFICE OF ARID LANDS STUDIES Tucson, Arizona 85719 1975 ADDITIONAL PUBLICATIONS ON ARID LANDS Office of A rid Lands Studies: Seventy-Five Years of Arid Lands Research at the University of Arizona, A Selective Bibliography, 1891-1965 Arid Lands Abstracts, nos. 3, 1972- to date J ojoba and Its Uses, An International Conference, 1972 Remote Sensing Conferences, Proceedings of the 2d (1971) - 4th (1973) Arid Lands Resource Information Papers Nos. 1-5 University of Arizona Press (*= OALS Authors): *Deserts of the World *Arid Lands in Perspective *Food, Fiber and the Arid Lands Coastal Deserts, Their Natural and Human Environments Polar Deserts and Modern Man *Arid Lands Research Institutions: A World Directory Arid Lands Resource Information Paper No. 6 THE IMPACT OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON WATER RESOURCES IN ARID LANDS Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography by Charles Bowden Research Assistant Office of A rid Lands Studies University of Arizona The work upon which this publication is based was supported in part by funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, as amended. University of Arizona OFFICE OF ARID LANDS STUDIES Tucson, Arizona 85721 1975 CONTENTS Page Foreword Author's Preface Abstract iii A cknowledgments iv I.Water and Energy in the Past 1 1.Ancient Energy Systems 1 2.Energy Appetites and Resources 7 3.The Problem of Aridity 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Energy Path Dependencies Amy L
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Florida Levin College of Law University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2017 Breaking Energy Path Dependencies Amy L. Stein University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons Recommended Citation Amy L. Stein, Breaking Energy Path Dependencies, 82 Brook. L. Rev. 559 (2017). Available at http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/ vol82/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Breaking Energy Path Dependencies Amy L. Stein† INTRODUCTION Clean energy development faces an uphill battle. Scholars and policymakers have spent extensive time identifying the barriers to clean energy development, including the intermittency of clean energy resources,1 the lack of a framework for capturing the externalities of energy sources,2 the need for more transmission infrastructure,3 and the lack of a utility business model that comports with efficiency and self- generation.4 Beyond these barriers, clean energy development must combat over one hundred years of institutional “stickiness” associated with the legal and regulatory framework governing energy derived from fossil fuels.5 © Amy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale in the West: 14 Unanswered Questions
    A Synopsis of Recent Literature by Oil Shale in the West: 14 Unanswered Questions June 2009 Oil Shale in the West: 14 Unanswered Questions Headwaters Economics, Bozeman, Montana June, 2009 PUBLISHED ONLINE: www.headwaterseconomics.org/energy ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofi t research group. Our mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 Contact: Julia Haggerty | 406-600-1766 | [email protected] www.headwaterseconomics.org Cover photo: Large-scale commercial tar sands mining activity north of Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada showing a shovel bucket and tar sands processing facility in the background. Surface mining for oil shale would deploy similar technologies. Source: BLM/Suncor Energy Inc. Accessed online, 6/17/09, http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/photos/index.cfm. HEADWATERS ECONOMICS ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 Summary Findings . 2 Background . 5 Uncertainties Regarding the Mechanics of Oil Shale Development . 7 Available Technology and its Constraints . 7 Environmental Impacts and Questions about their Mitigation . 11 Infrastructural Hurdles to Oil Shale Development . 13 Economic Questions: How and When Will it be Profi table to Develop Oil Shale? . 14 Opportunities and Obstacles to Oil Shale Development in Federal Policy . 17 Policy Support for Oil Shale . 17 Lingering Policy Obstacles . 18 Conclusions . 20 Bibliography . 21 HEADWATERS ECONOMICS iii INTRODUCTION Th is report summarizes recent research and policy documents to provide a brief overview of the current state of oil shale development in the U.S. West. Recent high crude oil prices, anticipation of a peak oil crisis, and a focus on developing domestic sources of fossil fuel have contributed to a renewed interest in mining and processing the oil shale found in Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado to yield a crude oil substitute.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Possible Carcinogenic Hazards Created in Surrounding Ecosystems by Oil Shale Developments
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1976 Assessment of Possible Carcinogenic Hazards Created in Surrounding Ecosystems by Oil Shale Developments Gerald L. Dassler Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Dassler, Gerald L., "Assessment of Possible Carcinogenic Hazards Created in Surrounding Ecosystems by Oil Shale Developments" (1976). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1559. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1559 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY IIII~IIII~I~IIIII~II39060 012144134 ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBLE CARCINOGENIC HAZARDS CREATED IN SURROUNDING ECOSYSTEMS BY OIL SHALE DEVELOPMENTS by Gerald L. Dassler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil and Environmental Engineering Major Professor Committee Member . "" Committee Member Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1976 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Don Porcella for the time he spent lending direction and guidance to this report. I also want to thank Dr. V. Dean Adams and Dr. A. Bruce Bishop for their support of my effort. The cooperation and contributions of people within The Oil Shale Corporation (TOSCO), especially Dr. R. Merril Coomes, deserve special recognition and a note of appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • PACE Synthetic Fuels Report V. 26 No. 4
    230.5'02 o pace SrntfletIc fne]its report OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS VOLUME 26 — NUMBER 4 — DECEMBER 1989 QUARTERLY Toil Eril Repository • 1Lr Lakes Library Sch',ol of M!:ts (S)THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. ®Reg . U.S. Pot. OFF. Pace Synthetic Fuels Rqiiat is published by The Pace Consultants Inc., as a multi-client service and Is intended for the sole use of the clients or organizations affiliated with clients by virtue of a relationship equivalent to 51 percent or greater ownership. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report is protected by the copyright laws of the United States; reproduction of any part of the publication requires the express permission of The Pace Con- sultants Inc. The Pace Consultants Inc., has provided energy consulting and engineering services since 1955. The company's experience includes resource evalua- tion, process development and design, systems planning, marketing studies, licensor comparisons, environmental planning, and economic analysis. The Synthetic Fuels Analysis group prepares a variety of periodic and other reports analyzing developments in the energy field. THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. SYNTHETIC FUELS ANALYSIS MANAGING EDITOR Jerry E. Sinor Pt Office Box 649 Niwot, Colorado 80544 (303) 652-2632 BUSINESS MANAGER Horace 0. Hobbs Jr. Post Office Box 53473 Houston, Texas 77052 (713) 669-7816 Telex: 77-4350 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS GENERAL CORPORATIONS lOT Notes Synthetic Fuels Research Efforts 1-1 NCA Urges "Marshall Plan" for National Energy Strategy 1-3 ORNL Sets Up Center for Global Environmental Studies 1-3 GOVERNMENT DOE Warns of Deteriorating Domestic Oil and Gas Production 1-5 DOE Makes New Round of Phase I Awards In SBIR Program 1-5 New SBIR Solicitation Targets Synfuels Technologies 1-8 National Energy Strategy Hearings Chug Along 1-10 ENERGY POLICY AND FORECASTS EtA Short-Term Outlook Sees Rapid Decline In U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability, Economics, and Production Potential of North American Unconventional Natural Gas Supplies
    AVAILABILITY, ECONOMICS, AND PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF NORTH AMERICAN UNCONVENTIONAL NATURAL GAS SUPPLIES Prepared for The INGAA Foundation, Inc. by: ICF International 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 USA Authors: Harry Vidas and Bob Hugman F-2008-03 Copyright ® 2008 by The INGAA Foundation, Inc. November 2008 This page intentionally blank 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents........................................................................................................................ 3 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Resource Definitions ...................................................................................................11 1.3 Objectives...................................................................................................................13 1.4 Major Conclusions of Study.........................................................................................13 1.5 North American Natural Gas Production Forecast.........................................................16 1.6 Report Findings by Category of Unconventional Gas ....................................................18 1.7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................23 2 Introduction........................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale Symposia Proceedings Index 1964-82
    \ no n QJ Oil Shale Symposia Proceedings Index Compiled by Gary L. Baughman and Christopher H. Cox Oil Shale Symposia Proceedings Index 1964-82 Oil Shale Symposia Proceedings Index 1964-82 Compiled by Gary L Baughman and Christopher H. Cox $30.00 Colorado School of Mines Press, Golden, Colorado Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Baughman, Gary L Oil Shale Symposia proceedings index, 1 964-82. 1. Oil-shalesCongressesIndexes. I. Cox, Christopher H. II. Titles. Z7914.028B38 1982 [TN858.A1] 665.4 82-19839 ISBN 0-918062-52-7 1 982 Colorado School of Mines All rights reserved Colorado School of Mines Press Publications Center Golden, Colorado 80401 Printed in United States of America CSM Press Replica Edition This publication is a CSM Press Replica Edition. The manuscript was submitted in camera-ready form so that it could be moved immediately, at little expense, into the production process. The responsibility for text and copy editing lies with the authors. Colorado School of Mines Jon W. Raese Managing Editor and Director of Publications The following publications on oil shale are available by writing directly to CSM Press, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401 : Proceedings of the First Five Oil Shale Symposia: 1964-68, cloth, $15.00 Synthetic Liquid Fuels from Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Coal: Proceedings of the Hydrocarbons Symposium, CSM Quarterly, volume 65, number 4, 1 970, $6.00 Selected Topics of Recent Estonian-Russian Oil Shale Research and Development, W.J. Cieslewicz, CSM Quarterly, volume 66, number 1,
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Boomtowns and Unconventional Natural Gas.Docx.Docx
    Journal of Rural and Community Development Journal of Rural and Community Development The Unconventional Boomtown: Updating the Impact Model to Fit New Spatial and Temporal Scales Author: Jeffrey B. Jacquet & David L. Kay Citation: Jacquet, J. B., & Kay, D. L., (2014). The unconventional boomtown: Updating the impact model to fit new spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 9(1), 1-23. Publisher: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University. Editor: Dr. Doug Ramsey Open Access Policy: This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. ISSN: 1712-8277 © Journal of Rural and Community Development www.jrcd.ca Journal of Rural and Community Development The Unconventional Boomtown: Updating the Impact Model to Fit New Spatial and Temporal Scales Jeffrey B. Jacquet South Dakota State University [email protected] David L. Kay Cornell University [email protected] Abstract The boomtown impact model, developed by researchers in the 1970s, implicitly assumes a spatially concentrated, finite resource will be extracted during a near- singular event (i.e., the “boom”), followed by a one-time “bust”. This model has been criticized for its lack of realistic longitudinal or macro-level perspective beyond the boom-and-bust, and seems unlikely to transfer successfully to the context of modern hydrocarbon exploitation. Technological innovations have unlocked massive reservoirs of natural gas in many parts of the world that challenge the notion of a geographically concentrated supply that can be quickly exploited.
    [Show full text]