DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Energy Development on Water Resources in Arid Lands: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of Energy Development on Water Resources in Arid Lands: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography The Impact of Energy Development on Water Resources in Arid Lands: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography Item Type text; Book Authors Bowden, Charles Publisher Office of Arid Lands Studies, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Download date 04/10/2021 05:21:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/238692 Arid Lands Resource Information Paper No.6 University of Arizona OFFICE OF ARID LANDS STUDIES Tucson, Arizona 85719 1975 ADDITIONAL PUBLICATIONS ON ARID LANDS Office of A rid Lands Studies: Seventy-Five Years of Arid Lands Research at the University of Arizona, A Selective Bibliography, 1891-1965 Arid Lands Abstracts, nos. 3, 1972- to date J ojoba and Its Uses, An International Conference, 1972 Remote Sensing Conferences, Proceedings of the 2d (1971) - 4th (1973) Arid Lands Resource Information Papers Nos. 1-5 University of Arizona Press (*= OALS Authors): *Deserts of the World *Arid Lands in Perspective *Food, Fiber and the Arid Lands Coastal Deserts, Their Natural and Human Environments Polar Deserts and Modern Man *Arid Lands Research Institutions: A World Directory Arid Lands Resource Information Paper No. 6 THE IMPACT OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON WATER RESOURCES IN ARID LANDS Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography by Charles Bowden Research Assistant Office of A rid Lands Studies University of Arizona The work upon which this publication is based was supported in part by funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology, as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, as amended. University of Arizona OFFICE OF ARID LANDS STUDIES Tucson, Arizona 85721 1975 CONTENTS Page Foreword Author's Preface Abstract iii A cknowledgments iv I.Water and Energy in the Past 1 1.Ancient Energy Systems 1 2.Energy Appetites and Resources 7 3.The Problem of Aridity 16 II. Water Needs of Various Energy Systems 20 1.Coal, Oil, and Natural Gas 21 2.Oil Shale 30 3.Solar Energy and Its Variants 32 4.Fission, Fusion, and Geothermal 36 III. The Colorado River 51 IV. The Missouri River 83 V. Conclusion 98 Supplementary List of References 103 Bibliography 123 Author Index 263 Keyword Index 267 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1.U.S. Energy Consumption Growth: Hydro, Coal, Oil, Gas, Nuclear 8 2.U.S. Energy Consumption Growth: Population vs. B.T.U. 9 3.Fossil Fuels in Human History 14 4.Epoch of Industrial Growth in Context of Longer Span of Human History 15 5.Coal Fields in WINB Member States 22 6.Principal Uranium Producing Areas for 87% of U.S. Production43 '7.Potential Geothermal Fields in the West 48 8.Colorado River Water Shortage (in acre -feet per year) 53 9.Southwest Energy Study: Energy Use Area; Energy Production Area (Colorado River Basin) 58 10.Southwest Energy Study: Load -Centers 1970 59 11.Southwest Energy Study: Total Primary Pollutant Emission Estimates, Phases I -IV 61 12.Black Mesa and the Peabody Mining Area 63 13.Effect of Rate of Shale -Oil Production on Spent Shale Output 77 14. Upper Colorado River Basin Water for Energy 1974 to 2000 80 15.Navajo Strip Mines near Four Corners 86 16.Stripping and Reclamation on Federal and Indian Leases 89 17.Northern Great Plains Power Development 92 FOREWORD The Arid Lands Resource Information Paper presented here is the fifth prepared for the Water Resources Scientific Information Center (WRSIC) of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology, on Grant No. 14- 31- 0001 -4258, to the University of Arizona, Office of Arid Lands Studies, Patricia Paylore, Principal Investigator.[A sixth (No. 5 in the series) was funded by another Federal agency.] Of the four preceding this one, most are out -of- print, attesting, we like to believe, to their timeliness and popularity. Like the others, this review addresses itself to an issue of considerable import in this year on the eve of our bicentennial celebration. While we do not offer hard - and -fast black -and -white answers, we do present the facts about the demands of energy developments on a diminishing water resource in the arid lands of the west- ern United States, as they are revealed in a massive study of the literature cited in the nearly 500 references displayed herein, including a number of environmental impact statements and Federal reports. We gratefully acknowledge National Science Foundation support in the development of the computer program that enabled us to manipulate successfully this substantial bibliography. The author travelled extensively throughout the states concerned with these potential developments, attending meetings and briefings, visiting plants, and dis- cussing with technicians, scientists, managers, and environmentalists the problems of energy developments as they relate to our water supplies and their demands upon this resource. The resulting interpretation, as it evolved from this nearly year -long task, and as expressed herein by Mr. Bowden, is one that in no way should be con- strued as the official view of either the U. S. Government or the University of Ari- zona's Office of Arid Lands Studies, but is rather a synthesis of views held with some conviction by him, as the author, and by myself, as the Principal Investigator. Mr. Bowden, in the Preface following, admonishes us to recognize the almost daily changing events that often determine policies in this fast -moving arena. Yet the reader would do well, we believe, to acknowledge the overriding constraints of our water resources here in this arid land, that persist throughout the variables of weather, politics, discovery, public opinion.If this cautionary view can prevail, perhaps in the decade ahead events themselves will be shaped on the basis of infor- mation, knowledge, application, rather than the reverse.Such is the motivation of this paper. Patricia Paylore Assistant Director Office of Arid Lands Studies University of Arizona January 1, 1975 Tucson, Arizona 85721 -i- AUTHOR'S PREFACE In August 1974 the Federal Energy Administration held Project Independence hearings in Denver. Although John Sawhill, the Agency's head, participated in the discussions, Project Independence was little mentioned, its target date of 1980 all but ignored.The Project as earlier mandated by President Nixon was by then dead.Instead, the talk turned to the problems of exploiting energy resources in the Rocky Mountain region, especially coal, coal gasification, and oil shale. By late fall of 1974, all had changed again.Oil shale had been shelved, by inflation among other things.Coal gasification was in limbo as companies de- bated whether the method could pay back its cost.Mr. Sawhill had been dismissed by a new president.Project Independence had issued its long - awaited and quickly- forgotten report. Such are the swift changes facing discussion of energy in this nation.For there is no real policy, there is only an appetite. The nation and its leaders are committed to maintaining what is called the American way of life.This means Americans will continue to consume one -third or so of the Earth's energy resources.In the hope of feeding this hunger for power, various ideas are periodically floated and periodically punctured. For years nuclear power was touted as an endless source of cheap power. Now the atomic industry is at best a troubled in- dustry, and the Atomic Energy Commission has been divided into two separate, perhaps weaker, parts.Currently, bills in the Congress are pushing solar energy, geothermal resources, wind power.Fusion reactors continue to have their champions.In this manner policy makers lunge to- ward some magic resource that will replace petroleum. And replaced it must be, for it is growing scarce and expensive. Such pivots of Federal thinking have a limited effect on the basic elements of water and energy in arid lands.The same problems always remain. Arid lands in the United States are pretty much dry, empty, pollution -free.Energy exploitation usually demands water, moves in human beings in numbers, threatens to dirty the air, land, water.Thus, while a paper such as this faces the prospect of being outstripped by events and proclamations, the prospect is often merely a mirage. The basic facts and problems of exploiting the arid lands remain, like the deserts them- selves, waiting. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Research for this paper gave me the opportunity to visit many mines, powerplants, institutions of higher learning, libraries, environmental groups, and government agencies, both Federal and state. Without excep- tion, I was always shown what I wanted to see, and my questions were always answered.I especially want to thank the Peabody Coal Company, Tucson Gas and Electric Company, the Tucson office of the U.S. Geological Survey, the Colorado Plateau Environmental Advisory Council and the Lake Powell Proj- ect of the Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff; and Kathy Fletcher of the Environmental Defense Fund, Denver. The University of Arizona Library documents staff protected me from much peril by guiding me through the jungle of Government publications. To those members of the staff of the Office of Arid Lands Studies involved with me in the preparation of the paper: Kathleen Stanley, Nancy Ferguson, Mary Michael, and Julie V. Garrettson, who struggled mightily to bring sense and order to the bibliography I fashioned and who suffered through many a conversation about water and energy in arid lands; Lynn Lybeck, Systems Analyst, who masterminded the computer program that produced the bibliography; and Cecilia Chavarnwho typed the final version with such care and interest, I owe more than can be expressed. Patricia Paylore, my editor and counselor, while giving me a great deal of freedom in putting this paper together, also periodically saved me from myself. Charles Bowden Tucson, Arizona December 11, 1974 SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS \ / / INPUT TRANSACTION FORM / ÿ THE IMPACT OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON WATER RESOURCES IN ARID LANDS, Bowden, C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMD Oil Shale Committee
    EMD Oil Shale Committee 2017 EMD Oil Shale Committee Report Justin E. Birdwell (Chair), U.S. Geological Survey November 29, 2017 Vice-Chairs: • Gerald Daub (Vice-Chair: Industry), Daub & Associates, Inc. • Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah • Michael D. Vanden Berg (Vice-Chair: Government), Utah Geological Survey Advisory Group: • Dr. Alan K. Burnham, Stanford University • Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma • Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: • John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd • Gary Aho, Sage Geotech • Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia • Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil • Ryan Clerico, Enefit American Oil • Alex Bocock, Red Leaf Resources • Christopher Hopkins, Canshale Corp. • Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group • Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp • Pierre Allix, Total S.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Low oil prices continue to hamper oil shale development around the world. Although new production capacity in Estonia and China has come online recently, efforts in other places are on indefinite hiatus or are well behind schedule relative to what was anticipated just a few years ago. The current status remains in flux, and recent developments in conventional and unconventional crude oil plays in the United States and elsewhere indicate this will not change anytime soon. Oil shale continues to be mined processed in China and Brazil, but production updates for 2016 were not available as of the preparation of this report. In Estonia, Eesti Energia (Enefit) continued development of their co-generation Auvere power plant that is designed to utilize both oil shale and other fuel sources (wood chips, peat, gas).
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic-Scale Control Over Modern Rainfall and Flood Patterns in the Levant Drylands with Implications for Past Climates
    JUNE 2018 ARMONETAL. 1077 Synoptic-Scale Control over Modern Rainfall and Flood Patterns in the Levant Drylands with Implications for Past Climates MOSHE ARMON Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel ELAD DENTE Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, and Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, Israel JAMES A. SMITH Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey YEHOUDA ENZEL AND EFRAT MORIN Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel (Manuscript received 23 January 2018, in final form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT Rainfall in the Levant drylands is scarce but can potentially generate high-magnitude flash floods. Rainstorms are caused by distinct synoptic-scale circulation patterns: Mediterranean cyclone (MC), active Red Sea trough (ARST), and subtropical jet stream (STJ) disturbances, also termed tropical plumes (TPs). The unique spatiotemporal char- acteristics of rainstorms and floods for each circulation pattern were identified. Meteorological reanalyses, quantitative precipitation estimates from weather radars, hydrological data, and indicators of geomorphic changes from remote sensing imagery were used to characterize the chain of hydrometeorological processes leading to distinct flood patterns in the region. Significant differences in the hydrometeorology of these three flood-producing synoptic systems were identified: MC storms draw moisture from the Mediterranean and generate moderate rainfall in the northern part of the region. ARST and TP storms transfer large amounts of moisture from the south, which is converted to rainfall in the hyperarid southernmost parts of the Levant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the Montréal Process Indicators of Air Pollution for the United States
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE MONTRÉAL PROCESS INDICATORS OF AIR POLLUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES JOHN W. COULSTON1∗, KURT H. RIITTERS2 and GRETCHEN C. SMITH3 1 Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Southern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 2 U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 3 Department of Natural Resources Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts ∗ ( author for correspondence, e-mail: [email protected]) (Received 11 October 2002; accepted 9 May 2003) Abstract. Air pollutants pose a risk to forest health and vitality in the United States. Here we present the major findings from a national scale air pollution assessment that is part of the United States’ 2003 Report on Sustainable Forests. We examine trends and the percent forest subjected to specific levels of ozone and wet deposition of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium. Results are reported by Resource Planning Act (RPA) reporting region and integrated by forest type using multivariate clustering. Estimates of sulfate deposition for forested areas had decreasing trends (1994–2000) across RPA regions that were statistically significant for North and South RPA regions. Nitrate deposition rates were relatively constant for the 1994 to 2000 period, but the South RPA region had a statistically decreasing trend. The North and South RPA regions experienced the highest ammonium deposition rates and showed slightly decreasing trends. Ozone concentrations were highest in portions of the Pacific Coast RPA region and relatively high across much of the South RPA region. Both the South and Rocky Mountain RPA regions had an increasing trend in ozone exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pre-Feasibility Study on Water Conveyance Routes to the Dead
    A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON WATER CONVEYANCE ROUTES TO THE DEAD SEA Published by Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Kibbutz Ketura, D.N Hevel Eilot 88840, ISRAEL. Copyright by Willner Bros. Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved. Funded by: Willner Bros Ltd. Publisher: Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Research Team: Samuel E. Willner, Dr. Clive Lipchin, Shira Kronich, Tal Amiel, Nathan Hartshorne and Shae Selix www.arava.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE MED-DEAD SEA CONVEYANCE PROJECT ................................................................... 7 2.2 THE HISTORY OF THE CONVEYANCE SINCE ISRAELI INDEPENDENCE .................................................................. 9 2.3 UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4 MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ............................................................................................................ 12 3 MED-DEAD PROJECT BENEFITS 14 3.1 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ............................................... 14 3.2 POWER GENERATION IN ISRAEL ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3 ENERGY SECTOR IN THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 20 3.4 POWER GENERATION IN JORDAN ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of EPA's Temporally Integrated Monitoring of Ecosystems (TIME) and Long‐Term Monitoring (LTM) Programs: Evaluation Methodology
    May 2009 EVALUATION OF EPA’S TEMPORALLY INTEGRATED MONITORING OF ECOSYSTEMS (TIME) AND LONG-TERM MONITORING (LTM) PROGRAMS Promoting Environmental Results Throu gh Evaluation Acknowledgements This evaluation was conducted by Industrial Economics, Incorporated (IEc) and Ross & Associates Environmental Consulting, Ltd. (Ross & Associates) for EPA’s Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation under Contract EP‐W‐07‐028. An Evaluation Team guided the effort consisting of David LaRoche, Jerry Kurtzweg, Michael Hadrick, and Michele McKeever of EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation; Matt Keene of EPA’s Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation; and Nancy Tosta, Jennifer Major, Shawna McGarry, and Tim Larson of Ross & Associates. Matt Keene also served as the technical program evaluation advisor. Keith Sargent, EPA National Center for Environmental Economics; Jay Messer, EPA Office of Research and Development; and Kent Thornton, FTN Associates also provided important historical context and input regarding analysis of economic data. We would also like to thank TIME/LTM program principal investigators who agreed to be interviewed for this evaluation. This report was developed under the Program Evaluation Competition, sponsored by EPA’s Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation. To access copies of this or other EPA program evaluations, please go to EPA’s Evaluation Support Division’s website at http://www.epa.gov/evaluate . TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS........................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfates and Hydrogen Sulfide
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Extension 1996 G96-1275 Drinking Water: Sulfates and Hydrogen Sulfide David L. Varner University of Nebraska at Lincoln, [email protected] Sharon Skipton University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Paul J. Jasa University of Nebraska at Lincoln, [email protected] Bruce I. Dvorak University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Varner, David L.; Skipton, Sharon; Jasa, Paul J.; and Dvorak, Bruce I., "G96-1275 Drinking Water: Sulfates and Hydrogen Sulfide" (1996). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. 1425. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/1425 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Extension at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Nebraska Cooperative Extension G96-1275-A Drinking Water: Sulfates and Hydrogen Sulfide This NebGuide discusses recommended practices to manage sulfur in a domestic water supply. Dave Varner, Extension Educator; Sharon Skipton, Extension Educator; Paul Jasa, Extension Engineer; Bruce Dvorak, Extension Environmental Engineering Two forms of sulfur are commonly found in drinking water supplies: sulfate and hydrogen sulfide. Both forms are nuisances that usually do not pose a health risk at the concentrations found in domestic water supplies. Sources of Sulfate and Hydrogen Sulfide in Drinking Water Sulfate Sulfates are a combination of sulfur and oxygen and are a part of naturally occurring minerals in some soil and rock formations that contain groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • “Environmental Impacts on the Dead Sea, Sustainability Cost Estimates”
    “Environmental impacts on the Dead Sea, sustainability cost estimates” AUTHORS Majed Atwi Saab ARTICLE INFO Majed Atwi Saab (2010). Environmental impacts on the Dead Sea, sustainability cost estimates. Environmental Economics, 1(1) RELEASED ON Friday, 05 November 2010 JOURNAL "Environmental Economics" FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Environmental Economics, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2010 Majed Atwi Saab (Spain) Environmental impacts on the Dead Sea, sustainability cost estimates Abstract The Dead Sea is a land-locked salt lake that’s below sea level. Over the last decade it has undergone a continuous drop in its water level of around one meter per year, shrinking by nearly 30 m since the beginning of the 20th century. The diversion of the Jordan River, the Dead Sea’s main freshwater feeder, and the use of artificial evaporation ponds by mineral extraction industries are the two main culprits of this dramatic decline. A number of different proposals have been made to resolve the inflow/outflow imbalance, but debate itself threatens the technical, economical and environ- mental viability of biblical salt water lake. One of these proposals includes a plan to re-diverting water from the Jordan River into the Dead Sea and to reduce the intensity of neighboring mineral extraction industries. We present an economic model to assess the costs of preserving the Dead Sea and stabilizing its water level and an estimate of the opportunity cost of environmental flows based on the economic value of irrigated agriculture and min- eral extraction industries.
    [Show full text]
  • AP Environmental Science Scope and Sequence
    AP Environmental Science Scope and Sequence Grading Period Unit Title Learning Targets Throughout the I. Earth Systems and Resources (10–15%) School Year A. Earth Science Concepts (Geologic time scale; plate tectonics, earthquakes, volcanism; seasons; solar intensity and latitude) B. The Atmosphere (Composition; structure; weather and climate; atmospheric circulation and the Coriolis Effect; atmosphere–ocean interactions; ENSO) C. Global Water Resources and Use (Freshwater/saltwater; ocean circulation; agricultural, industrial, and domestic use; surface and groundwater issues; global problems; conservation) D. Soil and Soil Dynamics (Rock cycle; formation; composition; physical and chemical properties; main soil types; erosion and other soil problems; soil conservation) II. The Living World (10–15%) A. Ecosystem Structure (Biological populations and communities; ecological niches; interactions among species; keystone species; species diversity and edge effects; major terrestrial and aquatic biomes) B. Energy Flow (Photosynthesis and cellular respiration; food webs and trophic levels; ecological pyramids) C. Ecosystem Diversity (Biodiversity; natural selection; evolution; ecosystem services) D. Natural Ecosystem Change (Climate shifts; species movement; ecological succession) E. Natural Biogeochemical Cycles (Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, water, conservation of matter) III. Population (10–15%) A. Population Biology Concepts (Population ecology; carrying capacity; reproductive strategies; survivorship) B. Human Population 1. Human
    [Show full text]
  • DOE/ER/30013 Prepared for Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No
    DOE/ER/30013 prepared for Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No. DE-AC02-81ER30013 SHALE OIL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INCORPORATING ORE BENEFICIATION Final Report, October 1982 by M.A. Weiss, I.V. Klumpar, C.R. Peterson & T.A. Ring Report No. MIT-EL 82-041 Synthetic Fuels Center, Energy Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Abstract This study analyzed the recovery of oil from oil shale by use of proposed systems which incorporate beneficiation of the shale ore (that is, concentration of the kerogen) before the oil-recovery step. The objective was to identify systems which could be more attractive than conventional surface retorting of ore. No experimental work was carried out. The systems analyzed consisted of beneficiation methods which could increase kerogen concentrations by at least four-fold. Potentially attractive low-enrichment methods such as density separation were not examined. The technical alternatives considered were bounded by the secondary crusher as input and raw shale oil as output. A sequence of ball milling, froth flotation, and retorting concentrate is not attractive for Western shales compared to conventional ore retorting; transporting the concentrate to another location for retorting reduces air emissions in the ore region but cost reduction is questionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues
    INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Oil Shale Development in the United States Prospects and Policy Issues James T. Bartis, Tom LaTourrette, Lloyd Dixon, D.J. Peterson, Gary Cecchine Prepared for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment (ISE), a division of the RAND Corporation, for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A History and Analysis of the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program
    Assessment of Oil Shale Technologies—Vol. II: A History and Analysis of the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program July 1980 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 80-600102 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003 -00763-1 Foreword This volume discusses the Federal Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program that began in 1974 when the U.S. Department of the Interior sold leases to four tracts in the oil shale regions of Colorado and Utah, A prior leasing attempt in 1968 is also described because it provides an historical perspective about the imperatives that have encouraged the development of Federal oil shale lands by private indus- try and the restraints that have inhibited such development. The report includes discussions of political, economic, environmental, and energy-related factors that affected both the 1968 leasing attempt and its successor—the current Prototype Program. The Program’s goals are identified, and its progress and status are examined to determine if those goals have been met or are likely to be met in the foreseeable future. &:N:zf;’- Director Oil Shale Advisory Committee James H. Gary, Chairman Colorado School of Mines James Boyd Estella B. Leopold Private Consultant University of Washington William Brennan Charles H. Prien** Rancher Denver Research Institute Rio Manco County, Colo. John F. Redmond Robert L, Coble* Retired, Shell Oil Co. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Richard D. Ridley Roland C. Fischer Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Colorado River Water Conservation Raymond L. Smith District Michigan Technological University John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Lakes Goals 2012 - 2017 Achievements 2005 - 2011
    Living Lakes Goals 2012 - 2017 Achievements 2005 - 2011 Save the lakes of the world! Living Lakes Goals 2012-2017 // Achievements 2005-2011 1 Living Lakes Members 52 51 24 50 5 3 18 84 2 17 47 83 81 1 25-35 79 4 48 82 36-46 49 78 76 80 6 19-23 77 90 98 86 75 88 89 85 96 87 7 8 9 97 91 92-94 10 99 100 53-72 95 11 12 73 13 74 15 14 101 16 102 Global Nature Fund (GNF) Editor in charge: Udo Gattenlöhner International Foundation Design : Patricia Lütgebüter for Environment and Nature Photographs: GNF-Archive, Fritz-Reichle-Ring 4 Living Lakes Project Partners, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany Günter Ziesler (p. 14), Phone: +49 (0) 7732 99950 Krzysztof Ostrowski (p. 27) Fax: +49 (0) 7732 999588 Cover photo: Mono Lake E-mail: [email protected] Visit us: www.globalnature.org This publication has been funded with support from the European Commission under the Lifelong Learning Programme. This communication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commis- Co-funded sion cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained by the Lifelong Learning programme therein. Page Page NORTH AMERICA AFRICA Living Lakes 1 Columbia River Wetlands; Canada 7 53 Lake Victoria; Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda 31 2 Lake Winnipeg; Canada 8 54 Lake Bogoria; Kenya * 3 Athabasca River; Canada * 55 Lakes of Bugesera Region; Burundi * Members 4 Lake Huron; Canada * 56 Bujagali Falls; Uganda * 5 Skeena River; Canada * 57 Lake Bunyonyi; Uganda * 6 Mono Lake; USA 9 58 Lake Chala; Kenya * 7 Lake Chapala; Mexico 10 59 Lake Ihema; Rwanda * 60 Lake
    [Show full text]