DOCSLIB.ORG

Nevada Inland Port Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nevada Inland Port Study NEVADA INLAND PORTS [Type a quote from the document or the summary of an interesting point. You can position the text box Dr. anywhereAlan in the document. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text Schlottmannbox.] IABILITY UNDING Spatial Economic V & F Concepts STUDY SEPTEMBER 2012 Financial Advisory Gaming & Hospitality Public Policy Research Real Estate Advisory Regional & Urban Economics RCG Economics LLC 3900 Paradise Road, Suite 209 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 www.rcg1.com Nevada Inland Ports: Viability and Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: NEVADA INLAND PORTS – VIABILITY AND FUNDING ..................................................... 1 INLAND PORT BENEFITS ................................................................................................................ 2 NEVADA ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 182 ................................................................................................. 5 APPENDIX: PERSONS & ORGANIZATIONS SURVEYED ................................................................................................... 8 PART I: NEVADA INLAND PORTS – VIABILITY AND FUNDING I. THE STATE OF WEST COAST PORTS .............................................................................................. I-1 PORT METRO VANCOUVER ......................................................................................................... I-4 PORT OF SEATTLE ...................................................................................................................... I-5 PORT OF TACOMA ..................................................................................................................... I-5 PORT OF PORTLAND .................................................................................................................. I-5 PORT OF OAKLAND .................................................................................................................... I-5 PORT OF LOS ANGELES ............................................................................................................... I-6 PORT OF LONG BEACH ............................................................................................................... I-6 MANZANILLO PORT ................................................................................................................... I-7 MANZANILLO PORT’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES VS. CALIFORNIA PORTS ................... I-7 EFFECTS OF THE PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION ................................................................................. I-8 ENDNOTES ............................................................................................................................. I-11 II. WHAT IS AN INLAND PORT? .................................................................................................... II-1 ENDNOTES .............................................................................................................................. II-7 III. ATTRIBUTES OF AN INLAND PORT............................................................................................ III-1 ENDNOTES ............................................................................................................................. III-7 IV. LOGISTICS/DISTRIBUTION CENTERS: BACKGROUND FOR NEVADA POLICYMAKERS .............................. IV-1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... IV-1 LOGISTICS: EMERGING ISSUES .................................................................................................... IV-1 TYPES OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS ............................................................................................... IV-2 FULFILLMENT CENTERS ............................................................................................................. IV-3 REVERSE LOGISTICS CENTERS ..................................................................................................... IV-3 E-COMMERCE ........................................................................................................................ IV-5 NEVADA WORKFORCE: ASSESSMENT TO MEET LOGISTICS CLUSTER NEEDS ......................................... IV-6 APPENDIX: LOGISTICS & OPERATIONS CLUSTER, KEY OCCUPATIONS ................................................................. IV-9 NEVADA OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY LOCATION QUOTIENT ........................................................... IV-10 NEVADA OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY HOURLY WAGE ................................................................... IV-11 i Nevada Inland Ports: Viability and Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) CLARK COUNTY OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY LOCATION QUOTIENT ................................................. IV-12 CLARK COUNTY OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY HOURLY WAGE ......................................................... IV-13 WASHOE COUNTY OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY LOCATION QUOTIENT .............................................. IV-14 WASHOE COUNTY OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY HOURLY WAGE ...................................................... IV-15 BALANCE OF STATE OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY LOCATION QUOTIENT............................................. IV-16 BALANCE OF STATE OCCUPATIONS: RANKED BY HOURLY WAGE .................................................... IV-17 ENDNOTES ........................................................................................................................... IV-18 V. NEVADA FREIGHT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... V-1 VI. INTERVIEWS: OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... VI-1 PROCESS ............................................................................................................................... VI-1 KEY RESPONSES ...................................................................................................................... VI-2 A. INTERVIEWS: LOGISTICS CLUSTER .................................................................................................... VI-4 E-COMMERCE/FULFILLMENT CENTERS ........................................................................................ VI-5 REVERSE LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................. VI-6 MANUFACTURING COMPONENT ................................................................................................ VI-7 MARKET PERSPECTIVES ............................................................................................................ VI-8 CASE STUDIES......................................................................................................................... VI-9 B. INTERVIEWS: INLAND PORTS ......................................................................................................... VI-13 WEST COAST PORTS .............................................................................................................. VI-14 COMPETITION ...................................................................................................................... VI-15 ALAMEDA CORRIDOR ............................................................................................................. VI-16 U.S. INLAND PORTS .............................................................................................................. VI-17 INLAND PORTS IN NEVADA ...................................................................................................... VI-18 NEVADA COMPETITION .......................................................................................................... VI-19 C. INTERVIEWS: TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................... VI-20 GENERAL INTERVIEW COMMENTS ............................................................................................ VI-21 RAIL EFFICIENCIES ................................................................................................................. VI-22 CURRENT RAIL CAPACITY IN NEVADA ........................................................................................ VI-24 RAIL DEMAND ...................................................................................................................... VI-25 RAIL FACILITIES ..................................................................................................................... VI-27 FUTURE RAIL EFFORTS ........................................................................................................... VI-28 TRUCK EFFICIENCIES .............................................................................................................. VI-29 TRUCK COSTS ....................................................................................................................... VI-30 TRUCKING: GENERAL INTERVIEW COMMENTS ............................................................................. VI-31 AIR CAPACITY ....................................................................................................................... VI-32 MCCARRAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ...................................................................................... VI-32 RENO/TAHOE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT .................................................................................... VI-33 ii Nevada Inland Ports: Viability and Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission
    Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report KTC -14-11/MTIC1-14-1F Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. © 2014 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. Kentucky Transportation Center 176 Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 fax (859) 257-1815 www.ktc.uky.edu Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Prepared for: Multimodal Transportation & Infrastructure Consortium by the Kentucky Transportation Center 11/21/2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank. Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Authors: Principal Investigator: Doug Kreis, PE, MBA, PMP Researcher(s): Sarah McCormack, MSc, CTL Research Engineer Christopher Van Dyke, MA Research Analyst Bryan Gibson, PhD Research Associate Multimodal Transportation and Infrastructure Consortium P.O. Box 5425 Huntington, WV 25703-0425 Phone: (304) 696-2313 • Fax: (304) 696-6088 Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes
    [Show full text]
  • SEASONS: the 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer
    TEAM GREER SEASONS: The 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer The City of Greer, South Carolina Founded: 1876 Population: 25,515 (2010 Census) Government: Council City Administrator: Edward Driggers Mayor: Rick Danner City Council: Jay Arrowood Wayne Griffin* Kimberly Bookert Lee Dumas Wryley Bettis Judy Albert * - Mayor pro tempore Area: Total 21.76 square miles Land 19.99 square miles Water 1.77 square mile Elevation 1,024 ft. Departments: Administration Building and Development Standards Fire Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Police Public Services Fiscal Year 2012 Budget: $17,588,375 Greer City Council District Representatives DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 Jay Wayne Kimberly Lee Wryley Judy Arrowood Griffin Bookert Dumas Bettis Albert CONTENTS 9 6 New Map Caps Redistricting Process After seven months of work and public discussion about the 10 redistricting process, Greer City Council successfully completed the arduous task with the Department of Justice’s approval. 7 Transit Oriented Development 101 A national planner helped Upstate elected officials, planners, and residents consider the future of the Highway 29 corridor. 11 14 8 Students Connect with Upstate Soldiers Soldiers in Kosovo received a special Thanksgiving greeting from a group of young artists and wordsmiths in Greer. 9 Concussion Training for Coaches Injuries are nothing new to NFL players and concussions are at the top of the list. What happens when youth league 20 players emulate their heroes when it comes to taking hits? 10 City Website Among ‘Best of the Best’ Departmental Reports A new design and creative features helped the City of Greer 22 Finance website earn honors from the Horizon Interactive Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • San Sep/Oct14 Cover to Do & Place
    SAN SEP/OCT14 COVER TO DO & PLACE INSIDE ISSA 6 ISSA will present its 2014 Achievement Awards during ISSA/ INTERCLEAN® North America being held Nov. 4 to 7, 2014 at the Orange County Convention Centre in Orlando, FL. (Page 8) ISSA introduces 2015 Board of Directors. HAND HYGIENE 9 Is Ebola the “Bat-out-of-Hell” and will we learn something from this experience? Certainly unprecedented in modern times if not for its cope but for the shear, terrifying manner in which the virus does its dirty deed, researchers say that the Zaire outbreak started when a fruit bat bit a two-year-old child. Within one week both the toddler and the mother were dead. INDUSTRY EVENT 12 ISSA/INTERCLEAN® North America is being held Nov. 4 to 7, 2014 at the Orange County Convention Centre in Orlando, FL. ISSA/INTERCLEAN is the only global 9 exhibition bringing together the world’s business leaders and pioneer thinkers in commercial cleaning and facility solutions, hosted by www.sanitationcanada.com ISSA and its partner Amsterdam RAI. on the cover contentsVolume 36, Number 3 SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2014 BUSINESS NOTES 18 Seven Symptoms of Bad Meetings The newly-expanded and and What You Can Do About renovated Markham Them. The door to the meeting room Stouffville Hospital is a opens and it’s the person who called the 710,000 sq. ft. teaching facil- meeting, running 10 minutes late ity with over 220 patient because the previous meeting ended late, beds. The quality of the pa- and then he had to stop by his office and tient experience remains the pick up some notes to remind him of constant for MSH in an what that meeting was about.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Strategies and Technologies—Phase I Final Report
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-17/0-6837-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date ASSESSMENT OF INNOVATIVE AND AUTOMATED FREIGHT February 2017 STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES—PHASE I FINAL REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Curtis Morgan, Jeffery Warner, Allan Rutter, Dahye Lee, C. James Report 0-6837-1 Kruse, Dong Hun Kang, Mario Monsreal, Jolanda Prozzi, Juan Carlos Villa, Jeffrey Borowiec, Leslie Olson, David Bierling, and Edwin Varela 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6837 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office March 2016 125 E. 11th Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78701-2483 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Systems and Development of Evaluation Tools URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6837-1.pdf 16. Abstract Many innovative freight delivery strategies and technologies have been proposed to address the future freight needs of Texas’s growing population. Changes in both buying habits and a shift toward direct home package delivery threaten to dramatically change distribution patterns and increase the number of intercity and local delivery trucks on Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) roadways.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Zoning Modifications Per HB 2001
    Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Daniel Echeverria, [email protected], 801-535-7165 Tracy Tran, [email protected], 801-535-7645 Date: September 26, 2018 Re: PLNPCM2018-00601 Inland Port Text Amendments Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: Multiple PARCEL ID: Multiple MASTER PLAN: Northwest Quadrant, Northwest ZONING DISTRICT: Multiple REQUEST: A proposal by Mayor Jackie Biskupski to modify zoning requirements related to inland port land uses as required by Utah Code 11-58-205(5). This statute gives the City until December 31, 2018 to allow an inland port and associated uses as permitted or conditional uses subject to standards that are determined by the municipality and consistent with the policies and objectives of the inland port authority. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings of this report, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed zoning text amendments meet the standards for a zoning ordinance amendment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation of petition PLNPCM2018-00601 to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Inland Port Jurisdictional Lands and Zoning Map B. Proposed Inland Port Overlay Zoning Ordinance Text C. Northwest Quadrant Overlay Zoning for Reference D. Conditional Use Standards for Reference E. M-1 Zoning District Land Use Table for Reference F. Analysis of Standards G. Department Review Comments H. Suggested Lighting Ordinance (from David Scheer) I. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLNPCM2018-00601 1 Date Published: 9/20/2018 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This zoning text amendment proposal was initiated by Mayor Jackie Biskupski in response to the State Legislature adopting modifications to Utah Code 11-58 “Utah Inland Port Authority Act” (HB2001) during a special session of the legislature held in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight and Air Quality Handbook
    Air Quality Handbook May 2010 Freight and Air Quality Handbook Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Freight and Air Quality Handbook Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ON FREIGHT-RELATED AIR QUALITY ............................... 3 2.1 EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS ........................................ 3 2.2 FREIGHT SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTANTS ..................................... 10 2.3 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ..................................................... 16 3.0 STRATEGIES FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
    [Show full text]
  • LTL Shipping Guide What Is LTL Shipping?
    Roadrunner Freight’s LTL Shipping Guide What is LTL Shipping? Less-than-Truckload (LTL) shipping is the action of moving freight that does not require a full trailer and moving it from Point A to Point B. When shipping LTL freight, shipments will share the cost and amount of space occupied on a trailer with other freight. LTL shipping is a cost effective alternative to Truckload shipments and provides many benefits to shippers, such as flexibility and competitive prices. Companies of all sizes take advantage of the cost savings, benefits and expertise that LTL companies provide, and is particularly beneficial to eCommerce, retail and manufacturing companies. Roadrunner Freight | rrts.com/freight Less-than-Truckload vs. Truckload Shipping There are many different options a shipper can take to move freight. When deciding between using a Truckload (TL) carrier or a Less-than-Truckload (LTL) carrier, the number of pallets being shipped, the weight, space occupied and time constraints should be taken into consideration. Less-than-Truckload shipping is often less expensive and more economical than Truckload shipping. If there are strict deadlines, this information must be shared with the carrier to ensure that all parties are meeting expectations. Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) Shipment The trailer is filled up with shipments from different companies who pay for space based on the freight’s density and dimensional weight. shipper one shipper two shipper three shipper four ROADRUNNERR FREIGHT Truckload (TL) Shipment The entire trailer is filled with goods from the same shipper. one shipper Roadrunner Freight | rrts.com/freight LTL Industry Overview Less-than-Truckload shipping began when businesses recognized that they frequently needed to ship smaller amounts of goods in a cost efficient and economical way.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverend Michael J. Amy
    Reverend Michael J. Amy Biographical Information YEAR OF BIRTH: 1952 YEAR OF DEATH: N/A ORDINATION: August 11, 1978 Employment/Assignment History 6/23/1978 - 7/05/1979 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Peace, Erie, PA 7/05/1979 - 8/28/1981 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory. Residence at Blessed Sacrament, Erie, PA 8/28/1981 - 6/14/1985 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory, Residence at Holy Trinity Rectory, Erie, PA 4/23/1983 Chaplin, Catholic Scouting Committee 6/14/1985 - 1/20/1986 Faculty, Elk Co. Christian, Residing at Holy Rosary Johnsonburg PA. Weekend Asst. St. Callistus, Kane, PA 1/20/1986 Weekend Asst. Holy Rosary, Johnsonburg, PA 6/14/1985 - 6/17/1988 Faculty, Elk Co. Catholic. Residing at Holy Rosary, St. Mary's, PA 6/17/1988 - 1/31/1990 Faculty, Bradford Central Christian HS. Residing at St. Bernard, Bradford, PA 4/19/1989 - 12/15/1989 Administration, St. Callistus, Kane, PA Residing at St. Callistus Rectory, Kane, PA 12/15/1989 - 12/22/1991 Pastor, St. Callistus. Residing at St. Callistus Rectory, Kane, PA 12/22/1991 - 2/05/1992 Sick leave 1/05/1992 - 3/01/1993 Sick leave 11/1993 Living in private residence Summary Between 1974 and 1975, Father Michael Amy - - a Seminarian at the time - - worked as a camp counselor at Camp Notre Dame in Fairview. In an October 25, 1993 letter to the Diocese of , Amy wrote: I took the opportunity to touch the genitals of several boys at night. Two, at least were aware of my fondling. In 1974 one of them ran away because of my molesting him.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Inland Ports Planningand Cargos Handling Opera Tion*
    V. INLAND PORTS PLANNINGAND CARGOS HANDLING OPERA TION* Inland Ports Planning General The term inland waterway port or an inland waterway terminal conveys the idea of an end point. Indeed, traditionally, ports were perceived as end points of the transport system whereby water transport of cargoeswas either originated or terminated. However, from a broader point of view, the one encompassingthe so-called "c~ain of transport", ports or terminals are neither starting nor ending points; they are simply the intermediate points where cargoesare transferred between the links in the transport chain. The emphasis on the transfer function in this introductory section is made since: (a) Ports' main function is to move the cargo and to avoid accumulating and damaging it; (b) In order to efficiently fulfill their transfer function, ports or terminals have to possess convenient access(rail and road) to the connecting modes of transport. broader definition ora port seems especially appropriate for our discussion on inland waterway transportation (IWT). IWT is part of the domestic transportation system which also includes rail and road transpiration. IWT, unlike rail and road transportation, can oQly connectpoints which are locatea on the waterway network. Consequently, in most caSes othercomplementary land transportation modes are required for the entire origin-to-destinationtransport. In other words, since in most casesthe IWT cargo does not originate or terminate atthe port site itself, the main function of the inland port is to transfer the cargo between IWTvessels, trains, and trucks. The inland ports are important for the economic development of a country. The inland port, therail, the road and the seaport are equally important.
    [Show full text]
  • Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities
    Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities Chad Miller1, Brian Richard2, MD Sarder3,Tulio Sulbaran4, and Martin Lipinski5 1,2,3,4University of Southern Mississippi Center of Logistics, Trade, and Transportation 118 College Ave. #5022 Hattiesburg, MS 39406 (601) 266-6666; fax (601) 266-6071; email [email protected] 5University of Memphis Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute 3815 Central Ave, Memphis, TN 38152 (901) 678-3279; fax (901) 678-0404; email [email protected] ABSTRACT The major driving forces behind the establishment of intermodal facilities include number of jobs that will be created by the facility, freight performance improvement, and other economic benefits to the region. Job creation is the most tangible benefit that stakeholders use to justify the development of such facilities. This project explores different job creation factors for intermodal facilities in terms of facility types, management structures, financing options, and activitiesperformed. Near port and hinterland type facilities are analyzed separately. This project tests several hypotheses statistically to find the correlations among different job creation factors. The result shows that the public landlord model facility creates more jobs than the private operator model. The result also shows that facilities connected with well-established transportation network systems usually produce more jobs. INTRODUCTION In today’s growing global economy, intermodal facilities have become increasingly popular as a method of increasing efficiency and decreasing costs across the entire spectrum of supply chain operations. Regions across the country are seeking to establish intermodal facilities as a means to fostereconomic development and jobs. In order for a facility to be considered intermodal it must be accessible by more than one mode of transportation such as truck, rail, ship/barge, or plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Transporation Plan.Indd
    Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland Water transportation is the most economical, energy effi cient and environmentally friendly transportation that exists for major cities today. The vast river network that was the original lifeblood of the Washington, DC region remains underutilized. The Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan is a comprehensive master plan outlining a water based transportation network on the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia, for commuters, tourists and the federal government (defense and civilian evacuations). This plan outlines an enormous opportunity to expand the transportation network at a fraction of the cost (both in dollars and environmental impact) of other transportation modes. The plan includes intermodal connections to the existing land based public transportation system. See Detail Plan GEORGETOWN REGIONAL PLAN KENNEDY CENTER RFK STADIUM NATIONAL MALL THE WHARF BASEBALL The plan to the left GEORGETOWN STADIUM NAVY YARD PENTAGON BUZZARD POINT/ SOCCER STADIUM POPLAR POINT illustrates the reach of FORT MCNAIR JBAB the transporation plan KENNEDY CENTER that includes Virginia, NATIONAL AIRPORT RFK STADIUM JBAB / ST. ELIZABETHS SOUTH Maryland, and the DAINGERFIELD ISLAND NATIONAL MALL GENON SITE District of Columbia, CANAL CENTER ROBINSON TERMINAL NORTH fully integrated with THE OLD TOWN- KING STREET existing land based WHARF ROBINSON TERMINAL SOUTH BASEBALL PENTAGON STADIUM NAVY YARD JONES POINT transporation. NATIONAL HARBOR POPLAR POINT BUZZARD POINT/SOCCER STADIUM FORT MCNAIR JBAB A TERMINAL ‘A’ Both Plans illustrate B TERMINAL ‘B’ C TERMINAL ‘C’ potential routes and landings for D TERMINAL ‘D’ MOUNT VERNON FORT WASHINGTON Commuters, Tourists NATIONAL AIRPORT and the Federal JBAB / ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Marinas of Anne Arundel County
    Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County July 2018 Anne Arundel County Office of Planning and Zoning Long Range Planning Division ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Office of Planning and Zoning Philip R. Hager, Planning and Zoning Officer Lynn Miller, Assistant Planning and Zoning Officer Project Team Long Range Planning Division Cindy Carrier, Planning Administrator Mark Wildonger, Senior Planner Patrick Hughes, Senior Planner Andrea Gerhard, Planner II Special Thanks to VisitAnnapolis.org for the use of the cover photo showing Herrington Harbor. Table of Contents Background Marinas Commercial Marinas Community Marinas Impacts of Marinas Direct Benefit Census Data and Economic Impact Other Waterfront Sites in the County Appendix A – Listing of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Appendix B – Location Maps of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marinas of Anne Arundel County Background Anne Arundel County has approximately 533 miles of shoreline along the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. This resource provides the opportunity for the marine industry to flourish, providing services to the commercial and recreational boaters. In 1980, the first Boating and Marina Study was completed in the County. At that time, the County had 57 marinas and 1,767 boat slips.1 Since that time the County has experienced significant growth in all aspects of its economy including the marine industry. As of June 2018, there are a total of 303 marinas containing at total of 12,035 boat slips (Table 1). This report was prepared as an update to the 1997 and 2010 marina inventories2 and includes an updated inventory and mapping of marinas in the County.
    [Show full text]