DOCSLIB.ORG

SEASONS: the 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEASONS: the 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer TEAM GREER SEASONS: The 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer The City of Greer, South Carolina Founded: 1876 Population: 25,515 (2010 Census) Government: Council City Administrator: Edward Driggers Mayor: Rick Danner City Council: Jay Arrowood Wayne Griffin* Kimberly Bookert Lee Dumas Wryley Bettis Judy Albert * - Mayor pro tempore Area: Total 21.76 square miles Land 19.99 square miles Water 1.77 square mile Elevation 1,024 ft. Departments: Administration Building and Development Standards Fire Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Police Public Services Fiscal Year 2012 Budget: $17,588,375 Greer City Council District Representatives DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 Jay Wayne Kimberly Lee Wryley Judy Arrowood Griffin Bookert Dumas Bettis Albert CONTENTS 9 6 New Map Caps Redistricting Process After seven months of work and public discussion about the 10 redistricting process, Greer City Council successfully completed the arduous task with the Department of Justice’s approval. 7 Transit Oriented Development 101 A national planner helped Upstate elected officials, planners, and residents consider the future of the Highway 29 corridor. 11 14 8 Students Connect with Upstate Soldiers Soldiers in Kosovo received a special Thanksgiving greeting from a group of young artists and wordsmiths in Greer. 9 Concussion Training for Coaches Injuries are nothing new to NFL players and concussions are at the top of the list. What happens when youth league 20 players emulate their heroes when it comes to taking hits? 10 City Website Among ‘Best of the Best’ Departmental Reports A new design and creative features helped the City of Greer 22 Finance website earn honors from the Horizon Interactive Awards. 23 Building and 11 The Prescription for a Problem Development Standards 24 Fire City residents are eliminating drugs with the assistance of Sgt. Chad Richardson and the Greer Police Department. 26 Municipal Court 28 Parks and Recreation 12 Cannon Centre Debuts . Again 30 Police A “makeover” is deemed a success as hundreds celebrate the opening and dedication of the Cannon Centre. 32 Public Services 14 Police Programs Land MASC Award Special Reports Safe driving initiatives – SIDNE and Alive at 25 – earn the City of Greer a top achievement award for municipalities. 33 Greenville County 16 City Residents Getting Connected Redevelopment Authority 34 Greer Development How can the City of Greer communicate with residents in Corporation the event of an emergency? Greer Connect is the answer. 20 Ports Authority Sails Inland to Greer Team Greer is produced by the City of Greer Communications Office The City of Greer may be more than 200 miles inland, but the S.C. Ports Authority considers it to be the perfect “port.” Copyright 2013 City of Greer, SC You can define Greer’s greatness I was recently asked to sit on some characteristics that I think can a panel at a national conference help Greer to continue to grow by to discuss sustainable communi- choice, not chance, and how you can assist in the process. ties representing the viewpoint of a Rick Danner “small town.” The other mayors on Mayor the panel represented a mid-sized ENGAGE city of 400,000 and a large city of Greer is fortunate to have citi- 1.2 million. zens and organizations that are As the discussion evolved it great places are the same regard- both innovative and visionary, but quickly became apparent that de- less of the population. often that is not enough. We need spite the extreme differences in our In his book, Great By Choice, leaders who are transformative and populations, our goal of improving Jim Collins explores why some com- can blend creativity with discipline. the quality of life for our citizens was panies thrive in uncertainty, even Creating great places is a marathon the same. In fact, despite the differ- chaos, and others don’t. He even not a sprint, so look for opportuni- ence in the size, scope and cost of attempts to define and quantify the ties to engage in the civic process. the projects we were all three work- role of luck in achieving greatness. ing on the same types of issues: I often hear the phrase, “Greer is EMBRACE parks, walkable communities, pub- just lucky because….” But like Col- lic safety, recreational amenities, lins’s analysis of successful compa- Transportation has shaped economic development, workforce nies, I don’t think we are any luckier how and where we have lived for housing, downtown revitalization, than other cities. We were just bet- the last two centuries, but technol- sustainable growth practices, etc. ter prepared to take advantage of ogy will be the driver in the future. I suppose the size of our city the opportunities presented to us. By utilizing smart growth design becomes irrelevant at some point It’s no accident I mention Collins’s we can address our current needs because even as the smallest city book because our staff has used while insuring a sustainable future, in the above mentioned instance, his worldwide best seller Good To but it will require a new mindset on as the 16th largest city in our state Great as a model for staff devel- some issues. Creating great places we are not categorically a small city opment and customer service im- will challenge us on many fronts, so in South Carolina. provements for several years and is look for opportunities to embrace Nor would Houston, Texas, with now implementing many of the con- positive change. 1.2 million residents, be considered cepts from his latest offering, Great a large city in China where even By Choice in a similar fashion. ENVISION small cities often contain in excess Like Collins, who identifies some The change we have seen in of 3 million people – which brings universal distinguishing character- Greer in the last 20 years should me to my point. Many of the guiding istics that cause a company to go eliminate the word mediocrity from principles and practices of creating from good to great, I want to share any conversation about the future of our community. We have set the bar high and you have every right to expect that a commitment to contin- ued excellence is now a part of our DNA. Creating great places pres- ents challenges that require mul- tiple perspectives to solve, so look for opportunities to help envision a community equipped to meet the needs of future generations. Population will never define Population will never define how “great” how “great” a place is to live, but you can. Join me in making Greer a a place is to live, but you can. great place to live, work and play. 4 You can define Greer’s greatness What makes a city a community? In late November, we cut short gender barriers. We were neighbors a meeting of department heads and unified by grief, empathy, and yes, administrative staff at Greer City even patriotism. Hall in order to take a short walk to In the City of Greer, events that Main Street. Ed Driggers bring us together are the norm. It’s a stroll most of us have City Administrator The City’s annual Freedom Blast made countless times – to lunch draws overflow crowds to Greer at a Greer Station restaurant or to City Park and Greer Station to cel- conduct business at the Police and many residents young and old alike ebrate our nation’s independence Court Complex. would set their schedules aside to and support our Armed Forces. On that day, however, the trip honor these young men whom they Visit one of our Thursday night was anything but routine. may have never met and support Moonlight Movies at the Greer City Hundreds of people lined Main their families. Park Amphitheater and you’ll find and Poinsett Streets to honor U.S. Too often, we become fixated grandparents in lawn chairs enjoy- Army Sgt. Channing “Bo” Hicks as with the size of cities in the United ing the evening beside teenagers his body was returned to his home- States. People rank status based stretched out on a blanket. town following a fatal attack in Af- on population and square mileage Each December when the ghanistan. and fixate on the word city when Christmas season arrives, we have Sadly, it was the third time in two compared to a town or village. the privilege of welcoming the com- years that large crowds watched a Population and area can make a munity to events ranging from the hearse drive beneath a giant U.S. difference when it comes to recruit- Christmas tree lighting to the popu- flag on West Poinsett Street. Pvt. ing new businesses and industries lar Breakfast with Santa. The atmo- Geoff Whitsitt of Travelers Rest and or improving a municipality’s ame- sphere at those events is like a very Pvt. Adam Ross of Lyman previ- nities and quality of life, but perhaps large family Christmas. ously paid the ultimate sacrifice in the real keyword of interest should A New York Times article asked Afghanistan while protecting our be community. the question last year: What makes a freedoms. Does it mean simply a group house a home? The writer answered Amid the salutes, tears, hands of people? Certainly to some, but her question in the next sentence: over hearts, and blessings offered to Mr. Webster’s primary definition in- The lives lived in it, of course. all three heroes, I found that heart- cludes a key word: a unified body of What makes a city a commu- ache was tempered by a sense of individuals. nity? I think a very good argument pride – not only that our country has The crowd that lined streets to can be made for the same answer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission
    Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report KTC -14-11/MTIC1-14-1F Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. © 2014 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. Kentucky Transportation Center 176 Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 fax (859) 257-1815 www.ktc.uky.edu Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Prepared for: Multimodal Transportation & Infrastructure Consortium by the Kentucky Transportation Center 11/21/2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank. Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Authors: Principal Investigator: Doug Kreis, PE, MBA, PMP Researcher(s): Sarah McCormack, MSc, CTL Research Engineer Christopher Van Dyke, MA Research Analyst Bryan Gibson, PhD Research Associate Multimodal Transportation and Infrastructure Consortium P.O. Box 5425 Huntington, WV 25703-0425 Phone: (304) 696-2313 • Fax: (304) 696-6088 Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Zoning Modifications Per HB 2001
    Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Daniel Echeverria, [email protected], 801-535-7165 Tracy Tran, [email protected], 801-535-7645 Date: September 26, 2018 Re: PLNPCM2018-00601 Inland Port Text Amendments Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: Multiple PARCEL ID: Multiple MASTER PLAN: Northwest Quadrant, Northwest ZONING DISTRICT: Multiple REQUEST: A proposal by Mayor Jackie Biskupski to modify zoning requirements related to inland port land uses as required by Utah Code 11-58-205(5). This statute gives the City until December 31, 2018 to allow an inland port and associated uses as permitted or conditional uses subject to standards that are determined by the municipality and consistent with the policies and objectives of the inland port authority. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings of this report, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed zoning text amendments meet the standards for a zoning ordinance amendment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation of petition PLNPCM2018-00601 to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Inland Port Jurisdictional Lands and Zoning Map B. Proposed Inland Port Overlay Zoning Ordinance Text C. Northwest Quadrant Overlay Zoning for Reference D. Conditional Use Standards for Reference E. M-1 Zoning District Land Use Table for Reference F. Analysis of Standards G. Department Review Comments H. Suggested Lighting Ordinance (from David Scheer) I. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLNPCM2018-00601 1 Date Published: 9/20/2018 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This zoning text amendment proposal was initiated by Mayor Jackie Biskupski in response to the State Legislature adopting modifications to Utah Code 11-58 “Utah Inland Port Authority Act” (HB2001) during a special session of the legislature held in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities
    Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities Chad Miller1, Brian Richard2, MD Sarder3,Tulio Sulbaran4, and Martin Lipinski5 1,2,3,4University of Southern Mississippi Center of Logistics, Trade, and Transportation 118 College Ave. #5022 Hattiesburg, MS 39406 (601) 266-6666; fax (601) 266-6071; email [email protected] 5University of Memphis Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute 3815 Central Ave, Memphis, TN 38152 (901) 678-3279; fax (901) 678-0404; email [email protected] ABSTRACT The major driving forces behind the establishment of intermodal facilities include number of jobs that will be created by the facility, freight performance improvement, and other economic benefits to the region. Job creation is the most tangible benefit that stakeholders use to justify the development of such facilities. This project explores different job creation factors for intermodal facilities in terms of facility types, management structures, financing options, and activitiesperformed. Near port and hinterland type facilities are analyzed separately. This project tests several hypotheses statistically to find the correlations among different job creation factors. The result shows that the public landlord model facility creates more jobs than the private operator model. The result also shows that facilities connected with well-established transportation network systems usually produce more jobs. INTRODUCTION In today’s growing global economy, intermodal facilities have become increasingly popular as a method of increasing efficiency and decreasing costs across the entire spectrum of supply chain operations. Regions across the country are seeking to establish intermodal facilities as a means to fostereconomic development and jobs. In order for a facility to be considered intermodal it must be accessible by more than one mode of transportation such as truck, rail, ship/barge, or plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Corners Intermodal Transloading Equinox 4Cite
    FOUR CORNERS INTERMODAL TRANSLOADING EQUINOX 4CITE Final November 2016 4CITE Public Involvement Plan October, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Scenario C .................................................................................................................................... 15 Scenario D .................................................................................................................................... 15 Scenario E .................................................................................................................................... 15 Project Overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 C. Scenario Network Performance ................................................................................................... 15 A. Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 15 B. Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Level of Service Methodology ....................................................................................................... 19 Stakeholder and Public Outreach ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Report Inland Port Proposed Zoning Modifications Qualtrics Survey Results
    Engagement Report Inland Port Proposed Zoning Modifications Qualtrics Survey Results Considering Typical uses of an inland port: · Rail lines that transfer freight to another mode of transportation, such as trucks · Large cranes that move freight between different transportation modes and temporary storage · Warehouses and distribution centers · Manufacturing facilities · Temporary storage of goods and materials awaiting distribution Do you see potential impacts to: Air Quality Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 96.06% 390 2 No 3.94% 16 406 1 Do you see potential impacts to: Water, Sewer, or other Public Utilities Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 89.37% 353 2 No 10.63% 42 395 2 Sensitive Natural Environments Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 89.00% 356 2 No 11.00% 44 400 3 Salt Lake City Neighborhoods Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 77.63% 302 2 No 22.37% 87 389 4 Do you have any other potential impacts you are concerned about? Not enough transparency the state doing whatever it wants w/o regard to the city or its residents Who benefits from the proposed “economic development”? Growth is to large for our area. We want a good area to enjoy. Increased population in valley, increased GHG emissions how it was created, who is on the boards, the facts that meetings are nt open My community has been footing the bill for all these public utility upgrades they say are required anyway but likely would not be.
    [Show full text]
  • SLC 2019 Resident Survey Results
    SALT LAKE CITY RESIDENT SURVEY OFFICIAL 2019 SURVEY OF SALT LAKE CITY RESIDENTS 1. Salt Lake City residents consistently report a high quality of life over time. 2. On average, residents rank investing in affordable housing programs as their highest priority city initiative. 3. 95% of respondents rank improving air quality as their highest environmental priority. 4. A majority of respondents believe Salt Lake City has job opportunities for them, but they also believe that the City can do more to attract businesses. 5. A plurality of residents would prefer to receive information regarding SLC via email. Fewer than a quarter report following the City’s social media accounts. 6. There is currently a general lack of knowledge regarding the Inland Port Project. Residents who follow the city’s social media accounts and use the city website report greater understanding of what the project is. 7. Favorability of the port is heavily divided with an average score of 42 on a scale of 0-100. Currently, greater understanding of the port is associated with less favorable opinions of it. 7FINDINGS TO REMEMBER SURVEY OBJECTIVES RESEARCH GOALS § Track approval of the City and the services it offers over time § Evaluate neighborhood perceptions regarding safety and city maintenance § Explore residents’ priorities regarding current City initiatives, including attitudes about public transit and the conditions of streets and roads § Examine from which communication channels residents most commonly receive information about the City and which modes they would prefer § Quantify understanding of and attitudes toward the Utah Inland Port SURVEY METHODOLOGY SAMPLING, MODE, & MARGIN OF ERROR § 1,297 residents within the boundaries of Salt Lake City participated in this survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Logistics Center Road Improvements
    IInnllaanndd PPoorrtt LLooggiissttiiccss CCeenntteerr RRooaadd IImmpprroovveemmeennttss D.O.T. National Infrastructure Investments FY2016 TIGER VIII Discretionary Grant Program Application TIGER VIII DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROJECT TITLE: INLAND PORT LOGISTICS CENTER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TYPE OF PROJECT: Road – New Capacity TYPE OF APPLICATION: Capital APPLICANT: CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY Local Government LOCATION OF PROJECT: Cocoa, Florida 32926 Brevard County Congressional District: FL‐15th District PROJECT AREA: Urban Area AMOUNT OF TIGER FUNDS REQUESTED: $9,672,638 APPLICATION AND PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION: Captain John W. Murray Chief Executive Officer Phone: (321) 783‐7831 Extension 233 Fax: (321) 783‐4651 Email: [email protected] Canaveral Port Authority 445 Challenger Road, Suite 301 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 3 II. PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT PARTIES ................................................................................................................. 7 IV. GRANT FUNDS AND SOURCES/USES OF PROJECT FUNDS ................................................ 8 V. SELECTION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 8 A. Primary Criteria ‐ LONG‐TERM OUTCOMES ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central New York Inland Port Market Feasibility Study
    FINAL REPORT CENTRAL NEW YORK INLAND PORT MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY potenti PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBMITTED BY: RSG CENTRAL NEW YORK INLAND PORT MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Background ................................................................................................................ 1 Principal Findings ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 | Physical Requirements .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 | Central New York Inland Port Proposals: History ......................................................................... 7 3.0 INFORMATION SOURCES .............................................................................................................. 8 4.0 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS .................................................. 10 4.1 | Rail Service ................................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 | Highway ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal & Logistics
    Intermodal & Logistics Winter 2019-2020 Market Scope 5 Current Market Trends The intermodal and logistics market is a dynamic and 1. Market Faces Urban Challenges: Largely due to the growing one, with various types of facilities, including rise of e-commerce and next-day delivery, our freight marine terminals, rail terminals, depots and container infrastructure is under strain. Shipments in 2018 grew yards, inland ports, freight airport terminals, and industrial 5.6% from 2017, setting a fifth volume record in the real estate located adjacent to intermodal facilities. last six years, according to the Intermodal Association Many facilities are like mini-cities, and a wide range of North America. Because many packages are now of engineering design services are required for their destined for individual residences, challenges extend creation and expansion, including land development, to not only those of the "last mile" but also the "final transportation, mechanical/electrical/plumbing, structural, fifty feet". As a result, smaller warehouses are being environmental, geotechnical, and water-related design. Continued on next page With more than 2,200 facilities, the North American intermodal market is the largest in the world. Top 10 Truck Bottlenecks in U.S. Peak Peak Avg. Avg. Top Clients Avg. Speed % Rank Location Speed Speed Change Major clients in this market sector contract with (mph) (mph) 2018- engineering firms directly, often using master service 2019 agreement-type contracts. These clients include: 1 Fort Lee, NJ: I-95 at SR 4 31.7 23.0 -7.65% 1. Ports: There are more than 300 ports in the United 2 Atlanta, GA: I-285 at I-85N 34.8 22.9 -7.35% States (source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis
    Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc Global Logistics Development Partners, Inc www.camsys.com report Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah & Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60603 Global Logistics Development Partners 14362 N. Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd. Suite 1000 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 USA date December 29, 2017 Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 2-7 Summary of Recommendations: .............................................................. 2-8 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-14 2.0 Inland Port Typology ....................................................................................... 2-17 2.1 What is an Inland Port?............................................................................ 2-17 2.2 Where are Existing Inland Ports? ........................................................... 2-17 Inland Port Types ..................................................................................... 2-17 Port Profile: DuisburgPort ....................................................................... 2-19 Port Profile: CentrePort Canada
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Community-Port Collaboration Resources to Address Diesel
    Helping Ports Providing Tools EPA Community-Port Capitalize on to Help Identify Funding for Clean Smart Infrastructure Collaboration Resources to Technologies Investments Address Diesel Pollution Promoting Port Community Increasing Collaboration Efficiency in Federal for Effective Planning Government and Webinar Port Operations April 9, 2021 Creating a Knowledge Clearinghouse 1 Accessing Spanish Interpretation for Today’s Webinar / EPA Para acceder a la presentacin en espaol PORTS INITIATIVE • Eberá descargar la aplicacin “Zoom” y unirse al seminario web usando la aplicacin (y no la versin en línea). • Debe usar el audio de su computadora o su teléfono inteligente (no seleccione las opciones 'marcar' o 'llamarme' en su teléfono mvil). Computer Instructions Smartphone Instructions 1.In your meeting/webinar controls, click Interpretation. 1. In your meeting controls, tap the ellipses icon (...). 2. Tap Language Interpretation. Click Spanish option. Language Interpretation Done 2.Click Spanish option. Original Audio English Italian 3. (Optional) Tap the toggle to Mute Original Audio. 3.(Optional) To hear Spanish-only, click Mute Original Audio. Mut e Original Aud·o 4. Click Done. 2 EPA PORTS Other Logistics for Today’s Webinar INITIATIVE • Attendees will be muted during the presentation • Questions • Anytime during webinar: send questions to “Host” via chat box. • Q/A at the end of presentation: “raise your hand” if you would like to offer a question verbally. • After the webinar: email [email protected] • Note: • Slides will be posted
    [Show full text]
  • 11/16/2018 an Ordinance Amending Part 7-6-20
    WEST VALLEY CITY, UTAH ORDINANCE NO. 18-42 Date Adopted: 11/13/2018 Date Effective: 11/16/2018 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PART 7-6-200P AND SECTIONS 7-1-103 AND 7-6-301 OF THE WEST VALLEY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ENACT ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS CONCERNING INLAND PORT USES. WHEREAS, Title 7 of the West Valley City Municipal Code establishes regulations concerning land use, development, and zoning within the City; and WHEREAS, certain land within the City is within the jurisdiction of the Utah Inland Port Authority; and WHEREAS, state law requires that property within the jurisdiction of the Utah Inland Port Authority can be developed with inland port uses as permitted or conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of West Valley City, Utah does hereby determine that it is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of West Valley City to amend Part 7-6-200P and Sections 7-1-103 and 7-6-301 of the West Valley City Municipal Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of West Valley City, Utah as follows: Section 1. Repealer. Any provision of the West Valley City Municipal Code found to be in conflict with this Ordinance is hereby repealed. Section 2. Amendment. Part 7-6-200P and Sections 7-1-103 and 7-6-301 are hereby amended as follows: 7-1-103. DEFINITIONS. Whenever any words or phrases used in this Title are not defined herein, but are defined in related sections of the Utah Code or the West Valley City Municipal Code, such definitions are incorporated herein and shall apply as though set forth herein in full, unless the context clearly indicates a contrary intention.
    [Show full text]